ML20029A740
| ML20029A740 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/11/1991 |
| From: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Beckjord E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20029A741 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9103040191 | |
| Download: ML20029A740 (2) | |
Text
'!
-Februray'11, 1991
.s I
MEMORANDUM _ FOR:
Eric S.;Beckjord,___ Director Offi_ce of Nuclear. Regulatory Research FROM:
Thomas E. Murley. Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 4
SUBJECT:
DOUB,;MUNTZ1NG AND GLASG0W DRAFT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NRC & AECL I _have received your comments on the subject agreement transmitted by memoran-dum of January-15, 1991.
At this time, the comments ~on=the' draft agreement are moot because Atomic Energy Canada, Limited, Technologies (AECLT) does not appear to be interested in pursuing direct funding _of a CANDU technology exchange pro-
-gram.
This position was. conveyed at a November 27, 1990, meeting between AECLT and a NRC-negotiating team.
Jerry Wilson, the RES representative on the nego-tiating team was present at this meeting.
I'
-The-staff-is work.ing with'OGC'to prepare an-0GC response to a Commission-staff requirements memorandum asking about_the possibility of obtaining direct funding from Canada for technology transfer.
Before the meeting of November 27, 1990, the' staff (including OGC)" developed two proposals that would allow AECLT
-to reference, in a design certification a) plication, the staff review of CANDU technology paid for by direct funding.
T1e OGC response to the Commission should be consistent with'these proposals and should define the limitations of aidirect funding agreement (e.g., what constitutes " licensing" services that' are covered by 10 CFR Part 170).. This position would be the basis for any future efforts to establish direct funding of a review of the CANDU technology.
We have considered your comments on the draft agreement prepared by Doub, Muntzing and Glasgow. ~We will involve the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. staff-in.any future effort to establish an agreement for the direct-funding,of a review of the CANDU technology'0risinaleignoo bt Frank J. Miraglia Thomas E. Murley, Director C'
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~
)
DISTRIBUTION:
Wentraldile w/ incoming PDAR R/F JGiitter w/ incoming NRC PDR w/ incoming RPierson DCrutchfield Local;PDR w/ incoming JPartlow TMurley/FMiraglia ETana.-PMAS (YT-910011)
DDambly (0GC)
JScinto (0GC)
SRamsey (YT 91011)i JWilson TCox
- see previous concurrence PDAR: NRR c.
-PDAR:NRR-PDAR:NRR TECH ED DAR:NRR-
'JGiitter*
TCox*
-8Pierson*
JMain*
Wiravers
- 01/28/91 01/30/91 01/31/91 01/3 91 02/ /91 h
DAR:NRR ADP:NRR 10:
D (O(A 1DCrutchfield* JPartlow
- FM ia y
p 02/05/91 02/07/91 02 91 0/ /91 1
n, 4' #
FICIAL RECORD COPY 7 p. /- d mo m r ~~~Wa jufy pgggu/;cd mm anu 1 u.
tu,
)
9103040191 910211 PDR ORG NRRD PDR
m t
g.r ntg
.4
'g UNITED STATES
{ c\\MM. /' fl'$';[%
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
WASHINGTON, D C. 20555 p.
%f.,.
f e
i"R uli t.
OR]GINAL DUE DT: 02/14<91 11CI ET int: OG li" > l l DDE D~l: u 1/1 Eu v.1 c
Ek1C 5.
BEU OuRD. DikECTOR Nkk RCVD DATE: 01/18,wl NERr Ri1E.
10:
MURLEy F DR 51GN41 URE OF :
i4
't E L 44 CRU! CHF ] E L.D DESC:
ROUT t i4G.
DOUB b NUM12 J tJu DRWI AthkEEMEN1 BETWEEN NRC 6 4 ELL MIRAGLl4 FARTLOW AES1GNED TO:
CONTACT:
GILLESP1E DAh CRURCHFIELD RUSSELL SMVRE Pi pese revi ew the due date immedietely:
If the due date doeti not allow adequate tithe tc, respond to thas.
- ticket, you may request a revised due date.
The request must have prior approval from the appropriate Associate Director or NRR Deputy Director-and must include a valid justification.
Contact NRR mallroom with t.he new due date (Cel este Smyre e>:t-21229).
P, ease do not carry concurrence pacl: ages to Directors of fice without f i r s;t goi ng through the NRR mailroom.
fe
.... m o n
t~
l f
i..
j i
] !/.
(
v.,) _._ L
//(
/