ML20028H802

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Telcon W/Wa Williams Re Possibility of Including Site in Connecticut in DOE Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
ML20028H802
Person / Time
Site: 07001100
Issue date: 01/08/1991
From: Wagoner J
ENERGY, DEPT. OF
To: Bickwit L
MILLER & CHEVALIER
References
NUDOCS 9101300138
Download: ML20028H802 (2)


Text

_.

vj wi rT* '! J J

...[

r.

Department of Energy f

Washington, DC 20585 t

j 3

JAN 8}$)l l

Mr. Len Bickwit

  1. u Miller Chevalier 655 15th Street NW Washington, DC 20005

Dear Mr. Bickwit:

This letter is in response to your telephone conversation with Dr. W. Alexander Williams of my staff concerning the possibility of-including a site in Connecticut in the Department of Energy's Formerly Utilized Sites Rer dial Action Program (FUSRAP). The site in question is owned by your client, Asea Brown Boveri-Combustion' Engineering. You indicated that your client believes the alleged residual contamination present at the site is a direct result of performing services for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC).

I understand that you offersd to submit to 00E materials that are pertinent to these allegations. We have no objections to receiving these materials; particularly helpful documents include:

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (or state) licenses under the o

Atomic Energy Act under which the site operates; the contract or contracts between Combustion Engineering and o

the AEC for the services in question; a brief description of the waste, how it was generated, and why o

it was disposed on site; and a map and description of the location and extent of the alleged' r

=

o contamination.

Dr. Williams previously sent you a copy of the FUSRAP designation-protocol. The protocol requires that two findings be made for designation of a site. These findings are that there is actual contamination at the site 104 that DOE has authority to remedy the problem.

i saat !!8683 M8sEgo

?

N' FIB

=

-~ --

-a

y I would like to emphasize that DOE has not made any determination concerning either the presence of contamination at the site or DOE's authority under FUSRAP to clean up any such contamination present. DOE commits itself only to evaluating the situation and the documents which you have offered to provide.

Sincerely, h,

t p

James W. Wagoner Acting Chief Off-Site Branch Division of Eastern Area Programs Office of Environmental Restoration

]

_..