ML20028H197

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Update Status as of 901030
ML20028H197
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/02/1990
From: Russell L
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Boger B
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9011160083
Download: ML20028H197 (14)
v • d • e


Text

- -

f 4

BALTIMORE OASAND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER

  • P.O. BOX 1475 e BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 l

LEON D RUSSELL November 02, 1990 NVOL$ Ah 4Af t fY & PLAtsNINO D(f*Althf(NT US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Attentjon: P:r. Bruce R. Boger Mail Stop 14A2 1

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

}

Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Performance Improvement Plan Update l

lt Enclosed please find a copy of the Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program (PIP-IP) Schedule Status as of October 30, 1990. There have been 41 Action' Plans so far, including the re-cently established Drawing > Improvement Program.

13'have been verified as fully.' implemented.

Attached is an updated list of l

key Action Plan information, including. verification status.

L Please contact me' (260-6680) or Rich Olson ' (260-3771) should you have any questions.

l Sincerely, (AA Leon B. Russell

/ Attachments

...G2 9011160083 901102

/

t PDR ADOCK 05000317 I

p PDC

.h

(

I i\\

3

Mr. Bruce R. Boger November 02, 1990 Page two bec: Messrs.

G.C.

creel (w/ synopsis & list)

C.H. Cruse (w/ synopsis & list)

R.E. Denton (w/ synopsis & list)

R.P. Heibel (w/ synopsis & list)

J.R. Lemons (w/ synopsis & list) 0.V. Graf (w/ synopsis & list)

G.L.

Detter (w/all)

B.S. Montgomery (w/all)

R.C.L. Olson (w/ synopsis)

R.F. Lewis (w/ synopsis)

J.S.

Fuoto (w/ synopsis)

\\

CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l

PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN i

SCHEDULE STATUS r

AS OF October 30,1990 l

l l

L t

5

(-

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY i

l' L '.

m 3_

J.-

6

  • --4_

M.J

-J.-

M--

a a

e+#-a.

4

.p o

D l

J l

i T

CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES I

i e

i

{

i h

l ll d-

[

i l

I

?

r

.4 4

l

~

~

8 t

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 1, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR MILESTONES.

WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE SO IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

  • 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE -114 DAYS

-42 DAYS 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS NEGATIVE

-28 DAYS 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION NEGATIVE

-25 DAYS 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NEGATIVE

-6 DAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE PLE ANALYSES FOR THE OCTOBER 30, 1990 DATA DATE:

0 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM PRITCHETT, TOM

-114 DAYS

' THIS ACTION PLAN IS -114 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE REPRIORITIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST.BY THE-VP-NED TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY PROCEDURES IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.

00 RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THIS ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE IS CURRENTLY BEING REVISED TO INCORPORATE AND ACCOMODATE THE COMMITMENT TO HAVE THE ADMIliiSTRATIVE PROCEDURES APPRO-VED AND ISSUED EY DECEMBER 31, 1990. A CHANGE REQUEST IS BEING PREPARED TO OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR SCHEDULE SLIPPAGE.

L l

C 2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MGMT PROJECT MANN, BRIAN

-42 DAYS-THIS ACTION PLAN IS NOW -42 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE DELAY OF CONTRACT AWARD FOR TASK 2,

" LICENSING CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEM". THE AWARD OF CONTRACT WAF ACCOMPLISHFD ON OCTOBER 12, 1990.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

l L

A CHANGE REQUEST IS BEING PREPARED TO-REBASELINE RESOURCES AND SCHEDULE l

NEW COMPLETION DATES.

5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM

-28 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -28 D.'.YS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO A BOTTLE NECK IN THE REVIEW PROCESS. CURRENTLY THE FINAL TECHNICAL REVIEW IS SCHEDULED TO COMPLETE ON NOVEMBER 16, 1990.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

EXPEDITE THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS.

INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ON CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.

5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL

-25 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS 25 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE PREPONDERANT NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO TASK 3 " STAFFING" WHICH WAS A COMMITMENT TO MAVE APPRO-PIATE STAFFING IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.

NOTE: TWO POSITIONS HAVE BEEN OFFERED, ONE PERSON HAS ACCEPTED.

TASK 5 "HVAC SYSTEMS EFFORTS" THE CONTRACT PACKAGE RESIDES IN PROCUREMENT, CURRENTLY THE MANAGER IS EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY ACQUIRING A CONTRACT RELEASE DATE.

TASK 7 " DETAIL TASK CONTINUATION" PIP PLANNING HAS BEEN ASKED TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO DEVELOPMENT OF TASK CONTINUATION.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

TASK 3: EXPRESS URGENCY FOR QUALIFIED CANDIDATES.

TASK 5 REQUEST WRITTEN STATUS OF CONTRACT.

TASK 7: A RECOVERY PLAN FOR TASK 7:

(A) ISSUE PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE FOR ACTION PLAN MANAGER REVIEW 11-6-90.

(B) PRESENT SCHEDULE TO PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 11-13-90 1

4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEH DOSWELL, JOE

-6 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -6 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE DELAY IN THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW PROCESS.

    • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

ACQUIRE PRIORITY STATUS ON THE REVIEW COMHITTEE AGENDA.

i APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT LEGEND:

% COMPLETE PIP BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACITVITIES DIRECFLY RELATED TO COMPLETION OF THE ACTION PLAN OR MILESTONES.

% COMPLETE ALL BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDING ONGOING AS A RESULT OF PIP ACITVITIES OR MILESTONES.

TOTAL FLOAT THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES REQUIRED TO SUPPORT THE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT STATUS.

NEGATIVE VALUES. INDICATE ONE OR MORE OFTHE l

MILESTONEIS LATE BYTHEINDICATED i

NUMBER OF WORKDAYS.

POSITIVE VALUES.

INDICATE THAT A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OFTHE ACTIVITIES AND THE MILESTONE MILESTONES.

l ZERO VALUE.

INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED ON TIME TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE.

IMPLE VERIFCOMPLETE "YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OFTHE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.

L

' REVERIFY' INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESUL'IS L

OFTHEIMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONALWORKTO BE PERFORMED ON THE Acr!ON PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION.

  • N/A"

- INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.

1

1 DATA DATE 300CT99 PEWFOeMANCE IMPWOWEMENT PUNE RUM DATL 01NOV99 1917MRS-EXICUTIVE SupptARY REPORT ALL IMPLEMENT, TOTAL 2 CSEPLETE START FINIS 81 TOTAL 9eILESTONES VERIFICT"It ACT PLAse 8

/

TITLE PLAff MA80AGER MA80eOURS *IP / ALL DATE BATE FLOAY C9erLETE CepWLETE MApeAGEfeENT PROCESS 194PROWE9EENTS================= --- -===----==== ~ -- =------ =****=========================== ---- - - e - -- - e -

2.91.9 PERFORMAIECE STAfeAEWS MARROWSKI, MYKE 1958 199 199 13JUL99 2845G99 9

VES i

i 2.92.9 COOWRSSICATIONS PLAIE BrNegeOE, ASSE 19959 99 99 12JAIES9 14SEC99 9

l 2.93.9 8ePP ISSJES DASES PLAfstI98G TIETJEN, KEN 775 99 99 SJeseS9 319EC99 9

2.95.1 COMMITMENT TRACKISEC SYSTEM MAWROWSKI, NIKE 27M 139 199 21APee9 5Jtsp99 8

YES VES I

2.95.2 WEGULATORY COUWIITMENT tee 9MNT PROCES teaset, BRIAfe 87264 1

1 19 EAR 99 efe5W92

-42 2.95.3 PERFORMAf8CE OBJECTIVE IMEWOWE9EEleTS MANKOWSKI, MIKE te/A 199 let SJefe99 12APW99 9

VES VES ORGAgeY ZAT IoseAL DvteAMI CS IMPROWEMEttTS====*-============================= - e a - - --- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - " - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

j 3.92.9 feAsenGIteG ORGaseIZATIOpeAL 8 PEM Cleefes fenestOWSetI, MIKE 1129 199 199 26Jtpe89 21SEP99 9

YES 3.93.9 LEADERSNIP CSIEFERE90CES temeKONSKI, MIKE 516 199 199 12JtSO99 200e5W99 9

VCS VES 3.94.9 TEAM tfORK S INTERFACES MARetOWSKI, MIKE 1936 88 SS 29JUL99 29penfr91 9

3.05.9 PROJECT MAfeAGEMENT ZUpW8 ALT, ERIC 2619 109 199 19JtfLS9 12SEP99 9

YES 3.96.9 DAILY 8 OUTAGE IIORK CONTROL THORP, JOISI 4822 let 199 22JtpeS9 26FE999 9

N/A N/A 3.96.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCIIEstfLiteG 90SefELL, JOE 14529 44 44 19JtsL99 6SEP91 9

[

3.9ti.2 MAINTEleA80CE tf0RK CONTROL seAY9EN, JDOWI 4299 92 92 IFE989 318EC99 9

l 3.96.3 OPERATIceeS IMPWOWEME9ff PLAft TMORP, JOISE 12314 34 27 IFEpe9 7APW95 9

i 3.97.9 EfeGIteEERIIeG PLA8effles MARIteARI, Best 5369 199 199 9um*9 29Jase99 9

VES VES

[

3.98.9 SYSTEM CIWCLES DAVIS, STEVE 4999 199 199 28100W98 9 MAW 99 9

VES VES i

3.99.9 OUALITY CIRCLES PWOGRAM E9efeltBS, ASSI 13959 199 40 14pendl89 2JAfe92 9

YES CSSE SSME NT CAPASI LI TY IMP 910VEMENTS==============================*======*========= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -================-== =

l 4.99.9 POEAC PTERISE9ER, PAUL N/A 90 / 4 98/A 31JUL99 31JUL99 9

YES VES j

4.91.9 OPERATI98G ENFERIEleCE WEVIEN FIERIf8CEW, PAUL 135M 55 55 15JAfe99 39SEP91 9

[

4.92.8 OC IMPROWEMElfTS RepWEEY, 9 TEN M299 92 87 IJtpIC9 219EC99 9

4.93.9 OA INTE9NGAL ASSESSMENT It'PHOWEMENTS ANtfJE, AfeA 11496 199 199 19MAV99 2JAfe99 9

YES VES f

4.94.9 198DEPEleEKT SAFETY EVAltf4TIcee UptIT PIERI9E9ER, PAUL 24352 89 89 Itamma 298EC99 9

{

4.05.9 SAFETY ASSESSME9ff KAT2, PETE 2494 97 97 SetAV99 2SFE991 9

4.96.9 9100T CAUSE AteALYSIS IMPIIOWEMENTS DAVIS, STEVE 25699 199 99 IJtseOS 11FE991 9

YES l

4.97.9 POSRC CAWWOLL, Jefet 1579 199 99 IJtseS9 39MDW99 9

YES l

4.98.9 OSSRC MIEWIIIKI MIKE 1229 199 199 29JAfeS9 25JAfe99 9

YES VES l

4.99.9 VISITIteG OTHER PLAftTS CAMPS, GENE 13M 199 199 3JUL99 2*Jtse99 9

YES VES 4.19.9 ISSUES MAseAGEMEteT SYSTEM DOSesELL, JOE 14696 25 25 19eav99 19Aus91

-6 ACT IVI TV COIe7WOL IMPWOWEMENTS ====== ==========*= ====e**===========

e - - - e 2=== - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -===================-

5.91.9 AUMILIARY SYSTEftS EleGI9EEERItes UBIIT TiepWNTOff, AL 98/A N/A IS/A SJUL99 5JUL99 8

YES YES 5.92.1 PWOCEDURE UPGRADE PROlWlast LATHeft, Daft 45993 99 41 IFE989 313EC92

-114 5.92.2 SUWWEILLA8eCE TEST PROGRAM DUIeKEIILY, CleARLIE 62497 91 13 IJUBIO9 230EC92 9

5.92.3 POST MAINTEleA00CE TESTiteG MAVDEN, JOISI 3998 199 199 IFE989 130CT99 9

VES YES

?

5.93.1 PROCUREMENT PROGEtAft PWOJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 49258 97 97 SSEP99 SJAlt91 9

{

5.93.2 EOUIP TECM DATABASE /MAINT P180G SYS SIROING, LAllWY 74688 M

52 19 ease 9 14Jtse91 9

5.93.3 TECMIeICAL teAfeUAL IMP 9tOWEMENTS ROY, TOM MIS 99 99 29FE998 40EC99

-28 5.93.4 DESICOI BASIS CO8eSOLIDATIose PERKS, PAUL 179352 96 le IMARe8 60CT94

-25

(

5.93.5 WECORDS MaseAGEMENT/90CUMEstT CostTWOL VOGEL, Afst 4291 199 199 SFE999 190CT99 9

YES 5.93.6 IpeFOllf9ATIO88 NESOURCE 9919ectf P9tOJECT BARTN, AL 13346 67 67 1FE399 70CT91 9

t 5.93.7 DRANIteG IMP 9tOtPEMEffT PWOGRAM KAT2, PETE 59999 21 21 IMAR99 14JUL92 9

1 5.94.1 SYSTEM EleGIteEER TRAINING YOE, JIM 13992 199 199 5MAV89 4Jafe99 9

YES VES 5.94.2 ff1880R MODIFICATIONS NOLSTOIt, N 7748

'78 78 22AUG89 23JAfe91

-6 I

5.04.3 WELIASILITY CEftTE9 PED MAINTEleaseCE CItEENE, KEN 14799 M

67 395EP96 58EC91 9

FIP VERIFICATIOee PROCESSES== ===== ======== ========== ====== ========*== ======= ======== ======= ============ ==== ===

6.91.9 PIP IMPLEMEttTATIODI WERIFICATION P9tIFER, JERRY 939 32 33 7JUL89 158EC92 9

}

6.93.9 FIP EFFECTIVEleESS WERIFICATIOle PIIIFER, JERRY M49 51 51 5FE399 12910W91 9

7

_ -_--- =-

TOTALS 1474134 73 43 29 fetes 60CT94

-114 19 12 l

4 L

1

.o I

1 f

o t

MILESTONE OVERVIEW h

I i

L

\\

1

[

t t

I

ll

'l ll l

l l

l l

ll w

l

'l WWWlg*w 2.!'l l

W W

l

....!*W W

W W lW l;E!

.W.t t lill t --Illil t liff 1l -t--*l--l--H, w

w www w

wwww

.ww w

1' i a.

i g

ll r

l

-,ll l

0 5

l l

l J

i W e. !

l N

R l

l

l WI :'

l

'l l

gl

.l

.l......-.~..j.n..W g b

j.

g".

j s s e, s s

..s sssss sg ss su sg ss sssssss..g.y((g, e_

q

j......

.l w

  • IW":

l; 1

l

{

f h

h !,. I E I I i

.W:

-.ss

~.

y.....~g

~....-..

l,-..-......,.~~.........

s.:~lsa.

. wr w

l C

C2;g W

~~

g

ll l-4 ll i

4 g

i Cl w

l th E

!--4.~

.~..

....E.see.....g!~g;,,eg... geg. g!$l[

ai g,

5

,, b,

a

sIf a

y

s w

f w

w

=

w CII I

IE I. l';

w w.ww

IN u I

WlE l-E atg!>l. -

I g g s.

E

-ll:Eg5 s*

4 Et a

ag alaaa"gl.W=l:g'e'er.g*et.gl. lraas*;;e.

u

g 5 E

I. il lli.l ww w

g w:

t:r.,11ilie;l.ilnlw::icegg:

g*=

se a;e

.2lgigg a

11g-

==

We w to s.w r

e 5

ll

-l a:

M :

E g

l R

3 r

5 g $g"

~!

E 81 In s

!H ta "l!

ll te r e

a:

.:-s

[,5gt E. ::

l. !a e

arg g

s ss We e!

r e

a e

I Em a

- n:

5 aegg ag e

ap aEll g

,e g ',',

w w

Ea e

nag.:

t

,a.r at

  • ene p,rgyg,s y

,I ic.gg

-w era

_E !

Sl 5lg I

Eg5 :: lu ge 5588I" or *el*gleg.

0 a -

5tlaw o g*! a t.

A "

ls!_

1 r

ag g s-a:

a wrigggsg! f:nI sunsi : gue:

w g fag :

w a _.

e n"W:.5E y *a r ::

a, ggt "llg!:s,Et!weaugi r

w m

- s:,e
s :a s gg:;gge. n ga llv,,. g:

rwg!gwwra!=e 8

ll-s wv

,rg

_i_

g_:

vEIIg

~~

E_

r333,~n=3,3,ym3,3g,33,s.3,s."e3,~,,~nsesn-~n:: W E E E E

! ! !. i g 3

2[

3: !:5..

I! 8 2:2:352:1:322 ste.22 stittt:Est:20:2000:111 :::

44 gg[:aanwaaggessesassepssssssssssg;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:s: g;p; l

N o

f CHANGE CONTROL OVERVIEW i

f e

e t

i 1

l-I

-s 3

~

l

~

4 l

l e,

e l

I-l l

l r,

...........g...........j.......-.......j-j j

E

.3.

1 l

a a

l.

E 4

r g

...-- :.-~.-.-~-. j....~--~...".......-~-.~,,~,,

l p

=g j

l l

w l

  • C l

=I.

...........ll...............!.l l

l l

l

>r l

l l

l l

olg l

l, l

ll C

d l

L l

- s' C

I,

.-~.-.-~~. :....u--~...:.......~~-.~,,~*g j

"g*

2

"'I.,

ll ll l

!l

- r:

.gj ggrI n

j W

W =

g *s:gWW E e.!a.sra E

IIg!g!4eielag!e.!gl!g!, liv"o.Ew!!

n g

. g g:

y

), l !l!lll444'.l. la t

- e ".

4. ". J lg8 agIge.I.I.ne! reg!ErlifiEEjj llllllllaIE l

.s -

...9 e:

d !#.

.g "!

.EEtj ll!!EE!!E4jE5a !!!ll*E3lgsas ll e

n:

g:

E ll g

I r

85 5

M f*

f E

E I

II ju.5 j"

bt E E

l 1 It

  • *=

g o

.5 WB Ifg w w

,1, 5

~

s:

vlg:,

w

, ggi L

e 155 gglnllla 'I.g Eg* y.

egr,le

,g g a

u lef,"g

.II !E rt g.f.

I, 0

E I

ll 5~~

la s

l

  • r *en ::

.r 3llgw elIg:.

sg eo I!lg!gfErt.3l l'.lgSa

!: 0 5 ll 5

B td*

8 E

ae

=

er gg e:

- ~

Vu s:

I.o,a -*sg

.s v,s !.I,I a

- Rl: :

-ce es!:rstg8:~~see"Ne*g,[egEg5ainfE

-

  • e5 aE:inrotgirlg[

al a

8 s;-.:lr g-l ss:

uR :-

err!n s g:

l5 E-ge-orre se an E!as

.# ! r..., ~. g s m s - ~.... g -.... m.. g..: ~. - e n. m - ~ m ; 3 i E5 I ti 228 3332 St$.2228ti 2

  • R

%22:22:22:3812:2:

g g l l ::a a a w [s e s s s s s e s e s p s s s s s s s s s s g;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; : s :

aa 1

l v-

i SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS l

Period of 03 October - 01 November Innlementation Verification: Verification of Action Plan 3.2 Man-i aging Organization and Program Change was completed 10/23/90.

Effectiveness Verification: The second Effectiveness Verification final report is expected to be issued the week of November 5th.

PIP-IP Revision 5 to the PIP-IP was submitted 10/29/90.

Transition Plannina:

Planning for the incorporation of our Per-formance Improvement activities to the 1991 Nuclear Program is l

underway.

The process for managing these activities will also be incorporated.

New Action Plant Action Plan 5.3.7, Drawing Improvement Program, was added to Revision 5 of the PIP-IP and serves as evidence of i

i our ongoing performance improvement efforts.

i l

i k

i 1

I i

i I

l N

i I

MASTER LIEI QE ACTION FLARE &ED &E NAHAGERS 11/01/90 STATUS

&Eg

&E RGE PHONE TITLE a

2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance Standards

<v>

2.2 A. Donohoe 4733 Communications Plan

<v>

2.3 M. Blank 4123 NPP Issues Based Planning 2.4 Resource Allocation v

2.5.1 M. Narkowski 4479 Cmtat Trackin6 System 2.5.2 B. Mann 6517 Reg Catet Mgmt Process v

2.5.3 M. Markowski 4479 Perform. Object. Improvements i

3.1 Organizational Improvements l

v 3.2 M. Markowski 4479 Managing Org & Pgm Change v

3.3 M. Markowski 4479 Leadership Conferences 3.4 M. Markowski 4479 Teamwork 6 Interfaces a

3.5 E. Zumwalt 4952 Project Management Improvements 3.6.1 J. Doswell 3506 Site Integrated Scheduling 3.6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp 4427 Operations Improvement Plan v

3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning v-3.8 S. Davis 4612 System Circles a

3.9 A. Edwards 6611 Quality Circles Program v

4.1(old) 4.1(new)

P. Pieringer 4060 Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Romney 4900 QV Improvements v

4.3 A. Anuj e 4919 QA Internal Assess Improvements 4.4 P. Pieringer 4060 Indep Safety Eval 4.5 R. Waskey 4160 Safety Assessment a

4.6 S. Davis 4612 Root Cause Anslysis

-<v>

4.7 J. Carroll 4103 POSRC l

v 4.8 M. Micrnicki OSSRC (#156 5450) v 4.9 G. Campo 4360 visiting (ther Plants 4.10 J. Doswell 3506 Issues Mgst System v

5.1 L. Tucker 4724 Aux Sys i.ng Unit 5.2.1 T. Pritchett 4968 Procedu.es Upgrade Program 5.2.2 C. Dunkerly 4854 Surveillance Test Program y

5.2.3 J. Hayden 4359 Post Maintenance Testing 5.3.1 K. Os11ars 4828 Procurement Program Project 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387 ETD/MPS.

5.3.3 G. Roy.

3612 Technical Manual Improvements 5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design Basis Consolidation a

5.3.5-A. Vogel 4481 Records Management / Document Control 5.3.6 A. Barth 3702 Information Resources Mgmt Project 5.3.7 P. Katz 2115 Drawing Improvement Program v

5.4.1 J. Yoe 4499 System Engineer Training 5.4.2 W. Holston 4466 Minor Modifications l

5.4.3 K. Greene 4385 Reliability Centered Maintenaace l

l a-All scheduled activities complete, but not verified.

v-Implementation Verification done.

  • - Not an " Action Plan," per se t

l

<v>- Implementation Verification with open item (s).

l

~

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20028H197&oldid=4610586"