ML20028F027
| ML20028F027 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1983 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301280484 | |
| Download: ML20028F027 (48) | |
Text
.
.J i
c
'r 4
4 y
/
JAN 2 4 E83 a ~2g o
sv MEMrRANDUM FOR: Chaiman Palladino FROM:
William J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
ZIMMER MONTHLY STATUS REPORT TO THE COMMISSION Enclosed is the Zimer monthly status report for December 1982.
(Signed William J. Dirch llilliam J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
. m 1 $
A _ r,w 'x J ' >
As stated cc:
Comissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Ahearne Comissioner Roberts Comissioner Asselstine SECY OGC OPE OIA 01 OCA PDR
,,, y. p, g p Distribution:
Dircks Roe Rehm 3
Stello
\\
Keppler N
DeYoung HDenton Res. Insp., RIII EDO R/F B301200484 830124 PDR ADOCK 05000358 R
PDR o"'c' >. R I,I I,
,,,R I,I,I,,
,EQ,0
=~~>. esc hweib,i n,z...JKe M,er,
,,Wpi,h,, d',,
our) 1, 83,,,,
1,- 18-8 3,,,,,,,1,-g,83,
. NRC FORM 318 tlO> 8OI NRCM O240 OFFICIAL RECOFiD COPY 4-
-32 u 24
t' o.
o u
1 li U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III i
ZIMMER MONTHLY STATUS REPORT December 1982 l
l l
1 i
w
8 6
f i
Table of Contents A.
Executive Summary l'
B.
Activity for the Month C.
NRC Zimmer Section Manpower Availability and Utilization r
1 D.
High Visibility Items E.
Quality Confirmation Program (QCP) 1.
Task I.
Structural Steel 2.
Task II.
Weld Quality 3.
Task III. Heat Number Traceability 4.
Task IV.
Socket Weld Fitup 5.
Task V.
Radiographs 6.
Task VI.
Cable Separation 7.
Task VII. Nonconformances 8.
Task VIII. Design Control and Verification 9.
Task IX.
Design Document Changes 10.
Task X.
Subcontractor QA Programs 11.
Task XI.
Audits F.
Ongoing Activities G.
Potential Plant Problems H.
FOIA Requests I.
Attachm'ents I.
Licensee's December 7, 1982 answer to NRC Order II.
Summ'ary of the progress of the QCP task areas III. QCP Status as of November 30, 1982 (Provided by Licensee)
I l
l l
l l
2 I
l
A.
Executive Summary A Commission Order, dated November 12, 1982, was issued stopping all safety-related construction and rework activities at Zimmer. Non safety-related work and the Quality Confirmation and verification programs are continuing.
In a letter dated November 26, 1982, the licensee submitted a request to allow Bechtel to perform the independent management assessnent required by the November 12, 1982 Order.
On December 28, 1982, Region III requested that the licensee provide supplemental information to their November 26, 1982 submittal. The licensee responded to this request on January 3, 1983.
The Region is evaluating the submittals and comments solicited from inter-ested parties. A public meeting in the Cincinnati area was held on January 5, 1983, regarding the comments. The comments received at the public meeting are being evaluated.
The licensee's December 7, 1982 response to the Order consented to its requirements and is provided as Attachment I.
The licensee has requested that it be given until March 1, 1983 to com-plete its response to the Region III " Demand for Information" issued on September 24, 1983. Region III has granted this request.
i Region III inspection efforts at the Zimmer facility during the month' of December were concentrated on review of nonconformance reports, monitoring and inspection of other ongoing activities including the QCP, monitoring of the stopping of safety related construction, and responding to requests for information.
Inspection Report No. 50-358/82-08 for SALP 2 was issued during the month.
Approximately 40-inspector man-hours were spent to answer December 6 and 15, 1982, congressional inquiries.
As a direct result of the actions committed to by the licensee under their Quality Confirmation Program (QCP), the licensee has identified a large number of significant construction deficiencies.
The licensee submitted four new construction deficiency reports (or l
potential reportable matters) per the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(e) l during December.
A total of 36 construction deficiency reports have been submitted in 1982. This compares with 13 submitted in 1981, 16 submitted in 1980, 8 in 1979, and 8 in 1978.
Section B below enlarges on the summary of activities during the month of December.
Section C contains no new information. Section D has no new information.
Section E contains some new information, but of relatively minor significance, such as changes in numbers of NR's reviewed by NRC.
l 1
3
Section F indicates all safety related work was stopped by the Commission's l(
Order. Section G has no new information. Section H indicates no FOIA I
requests were processed during December.
b Attachment II summarizes the changes in the QCP Task completion status and expected completion dates.
Attachment III is CGSE's QCP status report for the month of November.
B.
Activity for the Month
\\
i t
The Commission issued an " Order to Show Cause and Order Immediately l
Suspending Construction" on November 12, 1982.
In a letter dated November 26, 1982 the licensee submitted a request to h
allow Bechtel to perform the independent management assessment required i
by the Order. On December 1, 1982 the RIII Regional Administrator pro-vided the licensee's submittal to all interested parties indicating that comments received by December 15, 1982 would be considered by the Regional Administrator in reaching his determination. On December 28, 1982, Region III requested that the licensee provide supplemental information to their November 26, 1982 submittal. The licensee responded to this request on January 3, 1983.
(This response was received by Region III i
staff at the January 5, 1983 meeting.) The Region is evaluating the.
j submittals and comments solicited from interested parties. A public meeting was held on January 5,1983, in the Cincinnati Federal Building regarding the comments. The comments received at the public meeting are being evaluated.
Region III inspection efforts at the Zimmer facility during the month of Novepber were concentrated on review of nonconformance reports, monitoring and inspection of other ongoing activities including the QCP, and the monitoring of the stopping of safety related construction.
The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors is continuing
~
l Inspection efforts onsite. The National Board issued interim reports on May 12, July 1, (August 6 supplement), September 30, November 17, and November 30, 1982. The findings of the National Board are consistent with and similar to NRC findings. The licensee responded on August 4 and 30, October 20 and 29, November 17, and December 1, 1982, and-January 3 and 7, 1983.
Region III and IE representatives attended a meeting on January 5, 1983, at the National Board headquarters, Columbus, Ohio. The purpose of the meeting was to disc'uss the activities of the Authorized Inspection Agency I
(Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company) and its inspectors at the Zimmer Nuclear Site.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e), the licensee reported the following l
potential construction deficiencies:
i 4
t
r On December 6, 1982, the licensee reported that a review of design calculations conducted by Sargent and Lundy on low yield blast doors indicates they may be overstressed because some internal
'l stiffening members may be turned in the wrong direction. The doors are supplied by the Harty Company.
On December 8, 1982, the licensee reported that a review by H. J. Kaiser Company determined that some inspection personnel performed inspections without proper qualifications.
On December 10, 1982, the licensee determined that discrepancies exist in design calculations for cable tray loadings. Approximately 30 cable tray hangers have discrepancies.
On December 14, 1982, the licensee reported that their QA program for design, procurement, installation, and testing of the fire protection system was inadequately documented, necessitating a substantial review to verify acceptability.
Region III is continuing evaluation of the licensee's responses to the investigation recort 81-13 and civil penalty, no progress was made during the month because of other priority work.
Since the July Monthly Status Report was prepared, two petitions, both dated August 20, 1932, have been received from the Government Accountability Project (GAP). The first is for reconsideration of the' Commission's Order of July 30, 1982. The staff has considered this petition and made it's recommendations to the Commission. The second petition is to suspend con-struction of the Zimmer Station. On September 24, 1982, the RIII Regional Administrator issued a " Demand for Information" pursuant to the Commission's authority under Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act and 10 CFR 50.54(f) of the Commission's regulations. This " Demand for Information" requires the licensee to admit or deny each of the allegations applicable to the licensee's and its principal contractor's or subcontractor's performance contained in paragraphs 19 through 273 of the petition.
If the allegations are not admitted, they must explain the basis for not admitting the alle-gations.
In addition, they must identify the manner in which the Quality Confirmation Program (QCP) addresses the type of existing or potential quality assurance or construction deficiencies and problems identified in each of the above allegations.
If the QCP does not address such defici-encies or problems, CG&E must describe the manner in which they will ensure such deficiencies or problems are corrected. They were originally given-until December 31, 1982 to respond.
On October 18, 1982, GAP issued a supplement to their August 20, 1982 petition. The staff is reviewing this supplement. On November 22, 1982, Region III staff met with CG&E to discuss the " Demand for Information. On December 6, 1982, the licensee requested that it be given until March 1, 1983 to complete its response. Region III has granted this request.
NRC Region III was advised of allegations that relevant documentation on the welders at the Zimmer site was prepared for, or reviewed at, a meeting between Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company (CG&E) and H. J. Kaiser (HJK) 5
T
[
q s
held on July 8, 1982, but that such documentation was not discussed with, or made available to, Region III at a meeting on this subject held on July 9, 1982, between CG&E, HJK and Region III. Substantial documentation was made available to Region III in connection with _the July 9 meeting, but additional relevant documentation was allegedly not made available.
The matter of the existence of such documentation was informally discussed on October 15 and 20, 1982, between Messrs. B. R. Sylvia of CG&E and R. F. Warnick and D. R. Hunter of NRC Region III. Further information-was required to resolve these concerns and, if these concerns were found to be valid, to determine whether enforcement action, including modifica-tion, suspension, or revocation of CG&E license, is warranted.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act and
~
10 CFR 50.54(f) of the Commission's regulations, on October 27, 1982, CG&E was required by Region III to submit under oath and in writing, by i
November 16, 1982, a list of all reports or other documentation prepared by CG&E's or HJK's document rivicucre or other personnel in preparation j
for the meetings of July 8 and/or 9, 1982, or reviesel at those meetings, i'
Copies of any such reports were requested to be made available &i :ne Zimmer site for inspection by the NRC. (The licensee responded to this i
10 CFR 50.54(f) " Request for Information" on November 15, 1982. 'This response is currently being reviewed by Region III).
C.
Zimmer Section Manpower Availability and Utilization 1.
Assigned Manpower Section Chief (Assigned to Zimmer full time. Onsite part-time.)
Project Manager (Assigned to Zimmer full-time. 'Onsite as needed.)
Resident Inspectors Senior Resident (Full-time onsite)
Resident Inspector (Full-time'onsite)
Resident Inspector (Full-time onsite)
Investigators (Office of Investigations (OI))
Five Investigators (Full-time) 2.
Summary of Manpower Utilization Onsite and in office professional effort from January 3, 1982 through November 27, 1982 was approximately 9,759.5 manhours, with 810 of these manhours occurring between October 31 and November 27, 1982.
(These hours do not include those of OI investigators).
D.
High Visibility Issues None other than discribed in Sections A and B.
6 i
.g.
v a
E.
Quality Confirmation Program (QCP)
A summary of the progress of the QCP task areas is provided as Attachment II. The CG&E QCP Status Report as of November 30, 1982, is included as Attachment III. This attachment includes more detail than the following summary presents.
1.
Task I, Structural Steel Review of structural beams, beam welds, re-entrant corners, procure-ment of beams, beam and steel plate heat number traceability, and inspection of cable tray foot connections.
1 Effort by Licensee The licensee is continuing to inspect structural steel items including foot connections, drywell steel, control room steel, gallery steel, and switchgear steel.
The task involves 16 persons and is reported to be 67% complete with an estimated completion date of March 1,1983.
NRC Effort / Action Reviewed 2,107 initial issue nonconformance reports (NRs) and 157 dispositioned NRs and inspected a selected number of those reviewed.
~
Resident and specialist inspectors performed field walkdowns of actual conditions and rework activities.
Findings to Date The licensee has generated 1039 NRs identifying about 9546 weld deficiencies. The majority of the 4974 deficiencies dispositioned-have been dispositioned as " rework".
Four construction deficiency reports have been reported to the NRC concerning laminated angle iron, cable tray hangers / weld deficiencies, cable tray hanger " Nelson stud" deficiencies, and structural material-traceability and control.
2.
Task II, Weld Quality l
Review of welds performed, weld rod control, transfer of weld rod heat j
numbers, and deletion of weld inspection criteria.
l Effort by Licensee l
l The licensee is continuing to review the areas of structural weld cards, welding procedures, welder qualifications, small-bore piping welds, and large-bore piping welds.
l 7
p The task involves 5 persons and is reported to be 70% complete with
(
~
l the completion date still to be determined. The licensee is reorgan-izing the-task work with both HJK 'and CG&E performing the ' reviews to improve efficiency.
-k NRC Effort / Action
.j i
Reviewed 712 initial issue NRs and'126 dispositioned NRs and inspected
.{
a selected number of those reviewed.
Findings to Date The licensee has identified nonconforming conditions regarding weld.
I data sheets, heat numbers, welder qualifications, and welding proco-j dures. Discrepancies being identified' include lack of objective j
evidence, white-outs and ' cross-outs, signature differences, incon-sistent data, and lack of adequate acceptance criteria. - (Welder.
qualifications are being reviewed by a special HJK/CG&E task group.)
Due to the identification of the lack of-adequate control of draw -
i ings, inadequate acceptance criteria, and restart ofLthe review activity under a new program, the large-bore. piping weld. review has not progressed.
~
Three ccnstruction deficiency-reports have been identified to-the NRC' concerning weld' procedure deficiency, carbon weld rod in stainless steel weld, and lack of weld preheat or post weld heat treatment.
3.
Task III, Heat Number Traceability Reylew of installed large-bore and small-bore pipe heat _ numbers, heat numbers on isometric drawings, incorrect or marked-up heat numbers, and purchase orders.
Effort by Licensee i
The licensee is continuing to review heat number traceability in the areas of large-bore piping, small-bore piping,'and by purchase orders.
j The task involves 5 persons and is reported to be 40% complete with the estimated completion date still to.be determined.
NRC Effort / Action Reviewed 550 initial issue NRs and 90 dispositioned NRs.
Findings to Date The licensee has identified a substantial number of discrepancies.
regarding small-bore piping, large-bore piping, and purchase orders.
The nonconforming conditions include documentation deficiencies,-
lack of design change control, unsigned reports, use of unapproved-vendors, and upgrade of materials.
4 8
rp-----
g - - -,, - - - - -
-,,,,--,-w-g m-m--n-e g
.w--,,
e m,-me s v-w
- (
Three construction deficiencies have been identified-to the NRC con-cerning 2400 ft. of SA-106 Grade B piping, some bolting material, and control of " gamma plugs."
4.
Task IV, Socket Veld Fitup Review of socket weld fitup to ensure adequate disengagement.for small< bore piping.
Effort by Licensee The task is substantially complete with 29,821 fitups reviewed.of a total of 32,000. The final reviews of the identified-discrepancies and radiographs are being made.
The task involves 3 persons, and is reported as 98% complete with an estimated completion date of March 1, 1983.
- g
?
NRC Effort / Action i
Reviewed 115 initial issue NRs and 93 dispositioned NRs and inspected a selected number of those reviewed.
Findings to Date The licensee identified 695 weld joints which lacked evidence of disengagement and the joints have been radiographed. Of the 695 welds 111 have been rejected for lack of disengagement.
5.
Task V, Radiographs Review the radiographs which did not meet ASME Code requirements due to inadequately shimmed penetrameters.
Effort by Licensee The licensee has completed the review of the radiographs and is preparing a code inquiry to ASME concerning the shimming of the penetrameters.
The selected, qualifying radiographs are being reviewed to assess the weld conditions. Of the 61 welds initially identified, 2 welds have been found to be duplicates, I weld had been replaced and was removed from the list, and 12 welds are inaccessible. This reduces the total to 46 welds identified. All 46 have becn re-radiographed and accepted.
This activity is reported to be approximately 99% complete with a completion date of January 15, 1983.
9
~--
i.
NRC Effort / Action The resident inspector reviewed 113 initial issue NRs and 31 disposi-tioned NR.
Findings to Date
[
'i!
A substantial number of the M. W. Kellogg radiographs were not shimmed adequately; however, the quality and sensitivity of the rediographs I
appears adequate.
Two construction deficiency reports have been identified to the NRC concerning radiographs.
i 6.
Task VI, Cable Separation Review cable separation regarding essential and associated cables.
Effort by Licensee The licensee is continuing the review and evaluation of wall penetra-tions/ sleeves, associated cables for Class 1E panels, all 1E panels, and responses to engineering evaluation requests (EERs).
i The task involves 9 persons and is reported to be 55% complete (scope expanded) with a completion date of June 1, 1983 (scope expanded).
l NRC Effort / Action Reviewed 965 initial issue NRs and 285 dispositioned NRs and inspected a selected number of those reviewed.
Findings to Date i
Nonconforming conditions have been identified concerning cable separa-l tion, identification, and routing. The licensee has written 869 NRs and 489 NRs have been dispositioned (239 rework, 46 repair, and 204 accept-as-is) of which 218 NRs have been closed to date, with an additional 12 NRs cancelled because of duplication.
Three construction deficiency reports have been identified to the l
NRC concerning electrical cable separation.
7.
Task VII, Nonconformance Reports f
Review of noncomformances documented in surveillance reports, punch lists, and exception lists; and nonconformances not documented, not l
l entered, and voided rather than adequately dispositioned. Review 300 closed NRs and solicit NRs not entered into the system.
10 O
~-
t I,
?
I Effort by Licensee l
The licensee is continuing to review and evaluate nonconformances.
g N
Approximately 200 letters to former QC inspectors soliciting non--
conformances not entered into the system return receipt requested were mailed by the licensee. The responses were limited. One report haa been received from an individual identifying four potential NRs.
Additional procedures, field walkdowns, and a material impound area are being provided.
The task involves 4 persons and is approximately 61% complete with an estimated completion date of March 31, 1983.
NRC Effort / Action Reviewed 368 initial issue NRs and 257 dispositioned NRs and inspected a selected number of those reviewed.
Findings to Date Fifty eight NRs have been written due to' reopening of previously voided NRs.
Of these NRs, 43 have been dispositioned (15 rework, 1 repair, and 27 accept-as-is).
8.
Task VIII, Design Control and Verification Review procedures controlling design calculation completion, S&L program for controlling deviations from FSAR, correctness and-con-l sistency of FSAR, and design deviation identification and disposition.
I Effort by Licensee A programmatic audit of S&L design control was needed to complete this task. The audit was conducted on September 1-3, 1982 in Chicago.
There were no findings. The audit will not be closed until the two recommandations given by the audit team have been resolved.
The task is 99%-complete with an estimated completion date of February 28, 1983.
NRC Effort / Action The activity is being monitored with a closecut inspection planned to verify completion of the QCP Task VIII items, to identify any generic implications, and to evaluate the licensee conclusions.
Findings to Date No significant findings have been identified to date regarding the S&L work; although, the S&L system has been made more formal.
11 l
[
Four construction deficiency reports have been identified to the NRC regarding design control.
9.
Task IX, Design Document Changes (DDC)
Establish an accurate and complete listing of DDCs, DDC records, and associated QC inspection records.
Effort by Licensee This task was divided into five phases as follows:
Phase I Classification of CG&E, S&L, and HJK, DDCs as essential or nonessential.
Phase IA Classification of WY&B and other site contractor DDCs as essential or nonessential.
Phase II Review inspection documentation to determine if CG&E, S&L, and HJK DDCs have been incorporated and inspected.
Phase IIA Review inspection documentation to determine if WY&B and other site contractor DDCs have been incorporated and inspected.
Phase III Electrical inspections in the control room.
The original task (Phases I and II) is 42% complete. Phases IA and IIA are 14% complete and Phase III is 17% complete.
The task involves 7 persons for Phases I, II, IA, and IIA with an j
estimated completion date of June 30, 1983. Phase III involves 5 persons with an estimated completion date of February 28, 1983.
NRC Effort / Action l
Reviewed 548 initial issue NRs and 3 dispositioned NRs and inspected l
a selected number of those reviewed.
Findings to Date A number of deficiencies have been identified concerning missing documentation, misclassification of DDCs, inspection program defici-encies, failure to incorporate deficiencies, premature inspection, and incomplete' inspection documentation.
10.
Task X, Subcontractor QA Programs Confirm the quality of the Bristol Steel work and review all subcon-tractor QA programs or safety-related work to ensure the safety-related activities performed were acceptable.
Y 12
~I Effort by Licensee Bristol field welds are being reviewed within Task I and 80 audits of subcontractors were identified encompassing 13 subcontractors.
All 80 audits have been reviewed.
The task involves 2 persons and is 78% complete with an estimated completion date of February 28, 1983.
NRC Effort / Action None during this period.
i Findings to Date Six subcontractor audits may require audits of subsequent activities for confirmation of work that cannot be verified by document review or inspection.
Many of the 80 audits reviewed do not address all applicable criteria.
11.
Task XI Audits Review all past audits of HJK, S&L, GE, GED, EPD, EDTD, and GCD to determine depth and adequacy with respect to Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and appropriate closecut of audit findings. Justify the acceptability of the areas not audited.
Effort by Licensee Review of audits, audit summaries prepared, and all of the 296 past '
audits have.been reviewed.
The task involves 2 persons and is 82% complete with estimated completion date of February 28, 1983.
NRC Effort / Action None during this period.
Findings to Date Coverage of the audits was not sufficient to verify adequate imple-mentation of program requirements.
F.
Ongoing Construction Activities As of November 12, 1982, all safety-related construction activities,.
including rework of identified deficient construction was suspended by an NRC ORDER.
13 m
~
G.
Potential Plant Problems The following is a list of areas or items which Region III considers as potential problems and are being monitored by the inspectors.
Rust on the stainless steel liner plate in suppression pool Containment liner leak rate channel leakage (welds)
Sacrificial shield weld inadequacies (records and actual weld conditions)
Cable tray trapeze weld and support stud inadequacies Past personnel qualifications Past weld procedures Purchase of equipment Structural steel bolting Control panel and electrical switchgear mounting plug weld inadequacies Cable seperation inadequacies Control of records H.
Freedom of Information Aca (FOIA) Requests None du' ring this period.
14
- 1
.S l
. gPP,lHCIPAL STAFF
AD l YdU I
M f.RP L/(A0 W
3EP005 5LO j2 (EC-8 A10:50
~
y*LTP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA d'UCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n,
gi, r, 4 J 6fTd
." T i J
OL FILE the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- ,,.i vun In the. Matter of
)
)
The Cincinnati Gas & Electric.
)
Docket No. 50-358 Company, e_t_ a_1_.
)
Construction Permit
)
No. CPPR-88 (Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power
)
Station)
)
e APPLICANTS' ANSWER TO $HOW CAUSE ORDER AND ORDER IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDING CONSTRUCTION On November 12, 1982, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
("NRC" or " Commission") issued "An Order To Show Cause And Order Immediately Suspending Construction" - (" Order To Show Cause")
in the captioned proceeding.
The drder to Show cause reviewed matters relating to the construction of the Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station ("Zimmer Station") which formed the basis for the NRC's action.
In addition to immediately halting safety-related construction activities, including rework of identifiad deficient construction,Section IV of the Order To Show cause required that a number of specific steps be taken prior to authorization by the Regional Administrator for resumption of the halted work.
These included an independent review of the management of the Zimmer project, the submittal of an updated comprehensive plan to verify the ATTWMd I e212090073 821207 PDR ADOCK 05000358 G
- PDR, Q(( j 6j$82 MO3
- y
_.2.2.'"""~::.Z._.
- re ~
.: L.*:
m'
~
[\\
g quality of construction and the submission of a
.I comprehensive plan for the continuation of construction.
?
Section V of the Order to Show Cause described the t
i I
h alternatives for responding to the Commission's action.
By
.j this answer, Applicants state that, as provided for in 10 C.F.R. 52.202 (d), they are consenting to the requirements
.+1 h
proposed in Section IV of the Order To Show
- Cause, recognizing that, upon such consent, the terms of Section s
l IV.B becoma effective.
Thus, Applicants specifically state
.d that they are not requesting. a hearing on the Order to Show Cause.
Applicants have already taken the first step towards 3
compliance with the requirements of Section IV.B of the 1-Order To Show Cause.
.On November 26,
- 1982, Applicants 5-submitted documentation to the Regional Administrator in support of their selection of Bechtel Power Corporation to act a,s the independent reviewer of the management of the l ~j]
'c d
project.
V,.n 2l.]
While Applicants are now firmly committed to carry out the requirements of the Commission's November 12, 1982 Order and to take all other steps necessary to complete the construction of the Zimmer Station in a quality manner,
'Y nothing herein should be taken as an admission that any of T.
the factual ass'ertions or conclusions in the order to Show -
a 1
Cause is true.
Thus, Applicants do not agree that there has
.:t been a " widespread breakdown in CGEE's management of the j
- /M Zimmer project (page 1) or that "CGEE paid a civil
}q
?.
penalty of
$200,000 for the failure to implement an i
s
3....
- ...,.... c
~
?
r
},
acceptable quality assurance program (page 2).
Applicants also note their concurrence with the dissenting q
11
- Roberts, whose analysis of the views of Commissioner r.
ex'ent their own.
[,
situation parallels to a
significant t
Thus, actions which the Company had already taken to improve i
the quality assurance program prior to issuance of the Order N
J to Show Cause and matters which have been brought to light 3
.8 by the implementation of these efforts are seemingly cited
".4 by the Commission as a basis for its action,-
thereby s,.,
," ]
penalizing the Applicants, in effect, for such corrective
'y actions.
The mere determination that deficiencies have been
- p identified by the Applicants during the conduct of - their
- .19 7
Quality Confirmation Program and other quality reviews and reported to the NRC pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 550.55 (e) were
..g
'd therefore inappropriately used to support the NRC's action.
Yq Whether earlier implementation of a better quality 0
[j assurance program would have obviated the need for reporting h
such deficiencies is truly. irrelevant.
The fact that such 9
deficiencies are being reported shows the willingness of the
-8 I<
Company to comply with NRC regulations and to publicly l
identify their findings.
Such identified deficiencies will
', q.:
be corrected through the mechanisms provided by the quality jy l.ra 9)#
assurance program and, of course, their resolution will be
.Q l4 reported to the NRC.
I It should also be noted that a number of the listed
..,wf items on pages 4 through 6 of the Order To Show Cause were
..&.V M
not reported pursuant to 10 C.F.R.
S50.55 (e), but, in an e
1
,a;.. _ _. g,
r I
?..
h abundance of
- caution, were identified to the NRC as
]
l potentially reportable.
Certain of these turned out to not be reportable under that Commission regulation.
Of the 21 l
itemsonthosepages,5havebeenfoundtobe"rahortable,"
7 2 were ultimately determined to be "non-reportable" by the j
4j Applicants, and 14 are still presently categorized as only d
"potentially reportable."
d i
Similarly, the fact that the confirmation program t '.i y
reviews have identified 4200 non-conformances shows that
[
quality programs are
- working, not that there is any continuing breakdown in the quality assurance program.
Again, many of the remaining matters discussed in Section i;r b-2 III have been identified by the Applicants and, in all p(
- cases, the Applicants are working towards a
solution
wj acceptable to the NRC.
a even if such matters warrant an order to P
Furthermore, M
M show cause, there is little therein to,cpport an immediate halt in construction.
There is absolutely no hazard to public health and safety from continued construction of the A
plant, particularly given the demonstrated effectiveness of the Quality Control Program and Quality Assurance Program.
Applicants believe that this action in stopping construction
- v.
.N 2'
without any showing of an immediate threat to the public F. ~
d health and safety has set'an unfortunate precedent which has "Y
5.g
,.1 thy potential for causing unintended results in many areas y
'.gj wif.hin the Commission's field of regulation.
s'l 4; $?
-t
> ry A-m e - - -
- --. n
, ;.,.g
.g
_;.. - 3.y..
,g yg-q Nevertheless, inasmuch as the NRC's action of immediately halting construction is such as to not leave Applicants an adequate alternative and Applicants, desire to move forward towards completion of the Station, Applicants have consented to the action required by Section IV.B.
As
?
pointed out by Commissioner Roberts, a request for a hearing
.. I d
by the Applicants is really not viable in terms of schedule i
or expense.
Applicants would expect that their assent to 1
this Order will permit them to concentrate on completion of
?
the Station and would not at some time in the future be i
cited as justification for reconvening an evidentiary proceeding on this matter.
1 j.
Conclusion
- J Applicants consent to the provisions proposed in
,-l 1
Section IV of the Order To Show cause.
P Respectfully submitted, j
~.A CONNER & WETTERHAHN, P.C.
f h 1-1 0$
l fIwt Mark J. Wetterhahn Counsel for Applicants N
December 7, 1982
-:8
- .?
9 s.;
kN l
cg.
-J
,,, g g... f.g
, w,... g....
-;.., g,_
s-S d
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
..1 In the Matter of
)
)
+<
The Cincinnati Gas & Electric )
Docket No. 50-358 j'
Company, et al.
)
)
')
(Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power
)
Station)
)
u
[9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
,y i
I hereby certify that copies of " Applicants' Answer to Show Cause Order and Order Immediately Suspending y
Construction,"
dated December 7,
- 1982, in the captioned 1
matter, have been served upon the following by deposit in the United States mail this 7th day of December, 1982:
Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Dr. Frank F. Hooper
.g
'?
Atomic Safety and Licensing Chairman of Resource Appeal Board Ecology Program
~,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory School of Natural d
Commission Resources Washington, D.C.
20555 University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Stephen F. Eilperin t
Atomic Safety and Dr. M. Stanley Livingston Licensing Appeal Board Administrative Judge-
- 4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 1005 Calle Largo Commission Sante Fe, NM 87501 Washington, D.C.
20555 Chairman, Atomic Safety Howard A. Wilber.
and Licensing Appeal Atomic Safety and Board Panel Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory j
U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 I
Washington, D.C.
20555 Chairman, Atomic Safety Judge John H. Frye,, III and Licensing Board
~
Chairman, Atomic Safety and Panel 1
Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission t
Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
,49; Washington, D.C.
20555
,,4 l
l l
l
_t a
I
i: { _'___. ' - h sN _ j
,,,-g r _ _. m m y c
b Charles A. Barth, Esq.
David K. Martin, Esq.
1 Counsel f3r the NRC Staff Assistant Attorney General
.]
Office of the Executive Acting Director Legal Director Division of n
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Envircnmental Law Commission Office of Attorney General 5].
Washington, D.C.
20555 209 St. Clair Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 7
Deborah Faber Webb, Esq.
,s.
7967 Alexandria Pike George E. Pattison, Esq.
i1 Alexandria, Kentucky 41001 Prosecuting A,ttorney of i
Clermont County, Ohio M'
Andrew B. Dennison, Esq.
46'c Main Street Attorney at Law Batavia, Ohio 45103 200 Main Street Batavia, Ohio 45103 William J. Moran, Esq.
')
Vice President and l
L.I Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
General Counsel 1
Government Accountability The Cincinnati Gas &
F.i Project /IPS Electric Company d
1901 Q Street, N.W.
P.O. Box 960 Washington, D.C.
20009 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 J.]
John D. Woliver, Esq.
Docketing and Service
'1 Clermont County Branch Office of the
.j Community Council Secretary U.S. Nuclear
-t Box 181 Regulatory-1
- }
Batavia, Ohio,45103 Commission i:1 Washington, D.C.
20555 l.'
Brian Cassidy, Esq.
L' Regional Counsel Stephen H. Lewis, Esq.
~
f Federal Emergency U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Management Agency Commission
'i Region I Region III f
John W. McCormick POCH 799 Roosevelt Road Boston, MA 02109 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 1
I
.)
&n.&
I Robert M. Rader I
l, g
l cc:
Robert F. Warnick Director, Enforcement 1]
I and Investigation
_J NRC Region III 799 Roosevelt Road
.]
Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 1
fb
.=
!'.I J
~~ ~ ~~~- ~*==- m ~ ;*
- l
-1
_w-
.. ~ _.,.
....w,
T I
f
SUMMARY
OF THE PROGRESS OF QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM (QCP) TASK AREAS AS OF JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER, AND NOVEMBER 1982 TASK AREA PERCENT COMPLETE / EXPECTED COMPLETION AS OF l
JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER I.
STRUCTURAL STEEL
- 35%
50%
57%
58%
67%
'j 12/01/82 12/01/82 12/01/82 12/01/82 03/01/83 l
-II. VELD QUALITY
- 58%
62%
68%
70%
70%
j III. HEAT NUMBER 30%
33%
33%
36%
40%
TRACEABILITY
- IV.
SOCKET WELD FITUP 95%
96%
98%
98%
98%
10/01/82 10/01/82 12/01/82 12/01/82
-03/01/83 l
l V.
RADIOGRAPHS 97%
98%
98%
99%
99%
l 08/01/82 09/15/82 11/15/82 11/15/82 01/15/83 VI.
CABLE SEPARATION
- 52%
35%
44%
50%
55%
12/31/82 06/01/83 06/01/83 06/01/83 06/01/83 VII. NONCONFORMANCES 40%
52%
61%
.61%
61%
12/31/82 12/31/82 01/30/83 01/30/83 03/31/83 l
VIII. DESIGN CONTROL AND 99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
l VERIFIC,ATION 08/15/82 12/15/82 02/28/83 IX.
DESIGN DOCUMENT 35%
<32%
<33%
<35%
<37%
CHANGES 12/31/82 04/15/83 04/15/83 06/01/83 06/30/83 X.
SUBCONTRACTOR QA 65%
75%
75%
78%
78%
PROGRAMS 09/15/82 10/15/82 10/30/82 12/31/82 02/28/83 l
XI.
AUDITS 72%
74%
80%
82%
82%
10/08/82 11/15/82 11/15/82 11/15/82 02/28/83 l
1
- Areas viewed by Region III as potentially requiring a significant amount of rework.
- Estimated completion date to be determined.
l ATTACHMENT II
=
-... w.. s 1
i t
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM STATUS j
i AS OF NOVEMBER 30,1982 4
l
.BY l
J.F.SHAFFER l
DIRECTOR, QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM l
la l
_._ _.gigggiEi!B5? n _ ____
l QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM o
TASK I: STRUCTURAL STEEL ACTION BEING TAKEN 100" VISUAL INSPECTION OF ACCESSIBLE STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAM FfELD WELDS, A.
BRISTOL SHOP WELDS, RE-ENTRANT CORNERS AND WELDED CABLE TRAY. FOOT CONNECTIO 100' 0F ALL BEAMS INSPECTED ARE COMPARED TO THE DESIGN DRAWINGS B.
DOCUi'ENT CHANGES (DDC'S).
100" VISUAL INSPECTION OF HVAC SUPPORTS IN THE CONTROL ROOM.
C.
SU'"uRY OF TASK TOTAL
- ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOUP.S OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAININC 1)DRYWELL 322 0
322 0
100 0
0 LESS 525 ELV
- 2) REACTOR,
- 2992 293 1921 10 65 1758 2426 AUX SRV WATER BLDG
- 3) CONTROL RM 105 0
49 -
0 47 0
336 HVAC SPTS TOTAL 3419 293 2292 9
67 1758 2762 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 1.
NONC0f1FORMANCE (NR) SUMIMRY QUANTITY NUMBER NR'S DEFICIENCIES DEFICIENCIES.
ACCEPT AREA 1:RITTEN IDENTIFIED DISCOSITIO"ED AS IS REFORK REJECT REPA!!
[99I. Cggy; _ _ _ _ _ _,2 j @,,,,,,, _ _ _@? @ _ _ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _2 @ @ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
DRYWELL 281 1825 314 10 307 4
3 CONTROL RM 171(*4) 2488 2331 17 2312 4
1 41 122 121 0
121 0
1 GALLERY STL SWITCHGR 536' 4(*1) 0 0
0 0
0 0
SWITCHGR 567'5" 34 1953 1955 0
1933 0
2 SWITCHGR 546' 65(*8) 869 0
8 7
0 1
AUX BLD ROOF 591'19(*1) 119 0
0 0
0 0
CABLE SPRD 546' 122(*9) 78 0
0 0
0 0
HVAC 49 1117 0
0 0
0 0
+
TOTAL 1039(*23) 9546 4974 174 4768 8
23
(* ARE GENERIC)
I*
(I) a
. QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM o
TASK 1:
(CONT'D)
MAJORITY OF THE DEFICIENCIES ATTRIBUTED TO: OVERLAP, UNDERSIZE WEL NOTE:
UNDERCUT, WELD PROFILE, LACK OF FUSION, AND INCORRECT INSTALLATI BEAMS BEING INSPECTED ARE COMPARED TO DESIGN DRAW
-2.
CHANGES AT PRESENT, THE BEAMS THAT HAVE BEEN INSPECTED, AND H THE DESIGN, DOCUMENT REVIEW, APPEAR ON THE DESIGN DRAWING AND/0R DOCU'1ENT CHANGE (DDC).
COM"ENTS TASX I PROVIDED INSPECTORS TO PERFORM 64 INPSECTIONS F 1.
TRICAL CONDUIT SUPPORTS.
THE STOP WORK ORDER #82-02 STOPPING ALL WORK ON SCAFFOLDING, PAINT 2.
HAS GREATLY IMPACTED THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS C THE RANDOM SAMPLE INSPECTION OF 100 CON!!ECTIONS IN TH 3
DEFICIENICES NOTED THUS FAR ARE PRIMARILY COSMETIC IN IS IN PROGRESS.
C0!!PLETION IS CONTINGENT UPON THE RESOLUTION OF ITEM 2 NATURE.
ACTUAL PRESENT MANPOWER SUS >iARY I
TASK C0ORDINATOR 2
QUALITY SPECIALISTS 9
INSPECTORS 4
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 16 TOTAL STATUS THIS. TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 67C COMPLETE.
ESTIt ATED C0ftPLETION DATE MARCH 1, 1983 (2)
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM i
TASK II: WELD OUALITY ACTION BEING TAKEN A.
PERFORM A 100% REVIEW OF CODE PIPING KE-1 WELD DATA SHEETS TOTETERMIN ROD HEAT NUMBERS, INSPECTION STAMPS AND DATES, IDENTIFY MISSED HOLD POINTS, AND MISSING OR ALTERED DOCUMENTATION.
REVIEW OF WELD PROCEDURE AND WELDER QUALIFICATION, PAST AND PRESENT.
B.
SUtt'1ARY OF TASK t
TOTAL #
ITEMS ITE!!S PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF C0PLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS f.'.ONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINI!;G <
1)STRUCT.
11,000 0
11,000 0
98 0
416 KE-1 REVIEW 2)SM BORE 32,000 0
25,841 0
79 19 818 PIPE (APPX) 3)LG BORE 9,400 0
0 0
0 0
1373 PIPE (380 PSK'S) 4)1! ELD PRO-91 12 36 8
40
~104 1309 CEDURE (PROCEDURES)
REVIEW 121 REV's l
- 5) WELDER 4600 118 2574 2.5 55.9 27 1196 QUAL.
(DOCUMENTS) l REVIEW 6)h' ELD ROD 0
0 0
0 0
416 CONTROL TOTAL 57,121 130 39,451
.2 70 150 5528 l
CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 1.
AREA #1 CER 82-301 WRITTEN FOR AREAS OF CONCERNS ON STRUCTURAL DOC 2.
AREA #2 REWRITE OF 19-QA-14 COMPLETE, REQUIRES PROCEDURE REVIEW.
3.
AREA #3 PROCEDURE T'O BE WRITTEN, SEE TO BE RESOLVED, ITEM #1.
4.
AREA #4 36 CER'S HAVE BEEN GENERATED ON PROCEDURE'S REVIEWED.
AREA #6 PERSONNEL TO PERFOR!! INVESTIGATION AND PROCEDURE WRITING, HAVE BEEN RE-5.
CEIVED AND ARE BEING TRAINED DECEMBER 1952 TO DEVELOP PROGRAMS.
l l
D)
O e
7 QUALITYCdNFIRfiATIONPROGRAM i
TASK II:
(CONT'D)
}
TO BE RESOLVED 1.
COORDINATION WITH HJK REVIEW FOR NPP-1 PROGRAM TO EFFECT A COORDINATED N-5 i
INCLUDING ITEM (1) IN COW 1ENTS SECTIOrl.
2.
CONFIRit ACCEPTABLE HEAT NUMBERS ESTABLISHED BY TASK III.
f 3.
ACCEPTANCE OF REWRITE OF 19-QA-14 BY REVIEW BOARD.
i
(
MAf4 POWER
SUMMARY
ACTUAL j
f TASK COORDINATORS 1/2 INSPECTORS 0
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 4
CLERKS 1/2 TOTAL 5
STATUS THIS TASK IS APPR0XIMATELY 70!; COMPLETE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE l
TO BE DETERMINED BY HJK SCHEDULE OF NPP-1/N-S PROGRAMS (TO DATE, SCHEDULE NOT l
POSTED).
COMPLETION OF FINAL REVIEW 0F DOCUMENTS TO 19-QA-14 FOR 1982.
l l
l l
t (0)
L v
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK III: HEAT NUMBER TRACEABILITY ACTION BEING TAKEN A.
PERFORM A 100% REVIEW 0F SMALL BORE PIPING DOCUMENTATION AND-CONDUCT A FIE WALKDOWN OF THE SYSTEftS IDENTIFIED ON THE QCP LIST OF SAFETY-RELATED AND IM PORTANT TO SAFETY SYSTEMS.
B.
PERFORM A 100" INSPECTION AND/0R REVIEW OF DOCUMENTATION OF LARGE BORE FIELD MODIFICATIONS OF SYSTEMS ON THE SAFETY-RELATED AND IMPORTANT TO SAl SYSTEM LIST.
PERFOR!! A 100'; REVIEW OF ALL CODE AND STRUCTURAL PURCHASE ORDERS TO ESTABLISH C.
A LIST OF ACCEPTABLE HEAT NUMBERS.
D.
PERFORM A REVIEW OF PURCHASE ORDERS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL AND STEEL SHA DETERMINE IF PURCHASED ESSENTIAL OR NONESSENTIAL (THESE P.O.'S SHALL BE PA OF ACT' ION C). RESULTS OF THE REVIEW WILL BE USED TO ANSWER TASK 1 CONCER GARDING ACCEPTABILITY OF STRUCTURAL STEEL.
E.
PERFORM INSPECTION AND REVIEW OF GAMMA PLUGS TO GAIN ADDITIONAL INFORM EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF 10CFR50.55(e) REPORT M-56.
~
SUMMARY
OF TASK TOTAL #
ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS' THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING A)SM SORE 2691 ISK 0
52 0
2 14-2526 DOC L
2691 0
100 0
0 WLKDWN (APPX)
B)LCBORE 380 PSK 0
0 0
0 0
74,600*
DOC (APPX)
LG BORE 380 P.iK 0
0 0
0 0
WLKDWN C) PURCHASE 2728 15 59
.5 2.2 125 2826**
i ORDER REVW I
D)HJK STRCTL 1940 40 1940 2
95 30 40***
STEEL P0'S ESS/NONESS 1
E) GAMMA PLUG 404 0
219 0
54 0
209 50.55(e)M-56 TOTAL 11,214 55 4961 2.5 40 169 80,171
.h (5)
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM f
TASK III:
(CONT'D)
- 1)
- TOTAL MANHOURS SHOWN IS FOR BOTH LARGE BORE DOCUMENTATIO
)
- 2) ** INCLUDES STRUCTURAL STEEL P0'S IDENTIFIED IN ACTION D.
L i
-3)
CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS l
1.
IS PO'S HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND REJECTED BACK TO HJK DUE TO DEFICIENC IN THEIR REVIEW.
ITEMS COMPLETED REPRESENTS CONFIRMED PO'S 0"LY.
i 2.
1940 STRUCTURAL STEEL PURCHASE ORDERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED, 0F THIS NUMBER, j
1174 WERE ORDERED ESSENTIAL AND 766 WERE ORDERED NONESSENTIAL. APPROX 113 PO'S WERE B0UGHT NONESSENTIAL AND ISSUED ESSENTIAL.
i 3.
219 0F 404 GAMMA PLUGS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED. THE DATA HAS BEEN SUBMITTEDl CG&E NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTiiENT. ACTION ON THIS ITEM IS STOPPED PEND NED EVALUATION.
TO BE RESOLVED 1.
A METHOD OF SURVEILLING THE H.J. KAISER N-5 PROGRAM IS BEING RESEARCHED T ADDRESS ACTION B.
ADDITIONAL PROGRAM DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED IN HJK'S REVIEW OF S 2.
BORE PIPING TRACEABILITY. TASK III HAS DEVELOPED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND PROPOSING ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
COMMENTS THE FIGURE SHOWN FOR LARGE BORE R'EFLECTS AN APPROXIMATE NU'IEER OF MA 1.
NECESSARY FOR THE QCP TO PERFORM THE LARGE BORE WALKDOWN AND DOCUMENT RE91EW. THIS FIGURE WOULD BE MUCH LESS IF HJK PERFORMED THIS FUNCTION AN QCP PERFORMED A SURVEILLANCE OF THEIR ACTIVITY.
MANPOWER
SUMMARY
ACTUAL TASK C0ORDINATOR 1
TASK LEAD I
INSPECTORS 1
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 2
TOTAL S
(i-)
QUALITY CONFIRP.ATION PROGRAM TASK III:
(CONT'D)
STATUS THIS TASK IS 40% COMPLETE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE TO BE DETER!11NED AFTER COORDINATION WITH HJK AND CG&E DOCUME I
GROUP.
t i
e i'
e J
l l
l l
o k
8 I
s!
(7) j
o.
ll QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK IV: SOCKET WELD DISENGAGEMENT ACTIONS BEING TAKEN l
IDENTIFY SMALL BORE PIPING SOCKET WELDS FOR WHI A.
MENT DOES NOT EXIST.
~
RADIOGRAPH'100% OF THE ACCESSIBLE WELD NOT HAVI B.
MENT.
SUMMARY
OF TASK TOTAL !
ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCEf;T MA!! HOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPE!!DED f'A:H3UP.?
AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAI!;I':S !
i SOCKET WELD 32,000 0
29,821 0
98 0
240 l
IV l
DISENGAr,E-MENT CURREf!T STATUS AND RESULTS 348 RADIOGRAPHS TO DATE HAVE BEEN TRANSMITTED TO QADV A.
111 SOCKET WELDS HAVE BEEN REJECTED FOR LACK OF DIS B.
695 WELDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO DATE AS LACKIN C.
INSPECTION.
REJECT WELDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON NONCONFOR!!ANC D.
COMMENTS PERSONNEL BEING TRAINED TO PERFORM REVIEW TO 19-QA-02.
1.
PROCEDURE HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND SIGNED.
2.
ACTUAL MANPOWER
SUMMARY
1/2 TASK COORDINATOR I/2 CLERKS 2
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 3
TOTAL (3)
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK IV:
(CONT'D)
STATUS THIS TAST IS 98'; COMPLETE WITH A FINAL REVIEW TO CER 82-240 TO START.
DECEMBER.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE AN EST! MATED MARCH 1,1983 PENDIt;G APPROVAL OF ENGIflEERING EVALUATI0t!
COMPLETION DATE FOR THE SECOND REVIEW IS JANUARY 31, 1983.
IMPLIMENTATION OF 19-QA-02 TO EE C0"PLETED BY DECEf1SER.31,1982.
b -
h l
I l
l l
b.*.I
~
l
j QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK V: RADIOGRAPy ACTION TO BE TAKEN CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING RADIOGRAPHS OF LARGE BORE PIPING S'U A.
M. W. KELLOGG ARE ADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY WELD DEFICIENCIES, stN!!ARY OF TASK TOTAL #
ITEMS ITEtts PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS I
OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS M0f;TH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS l'OfiTH REttA!NIN RADIOGRAPHY 4250 0
4250 0
100 0
0 REVIEW RADIOGRAPHS 46 0
46 0
100 30 10 PHASE II TOTALS 4296 0
4296 0
100 30 10 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS A.
REVIEW OF 4250 WELD RADIOGRAPHS FOR SENSITIVITY IS COMPLETE.
B.
46 WELDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO BE RE-RADIOGRAPHED, COVERING ALL VARIATION IN PIPE AND WALL THICKNESS.
PROGRAtt TO CONFIRM RADIOGRAPHS HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE NATIONAL BO C.
PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTORS AND THE STATE OF OHIO.
D.
46 0F THE 46 RADIOGRAPHS HAVE BEEN RE-RADIOGRAPHED, AND ACCEPTED.
E.
M0CK-UPS OF THE 4 INACCESSABLE WELDS WERE FASRICATED AND RADIOGRAPHED.
TO BE RESOLVED COM1ENTS A FINAL REPORT FOR TASK V HAS BEEN WRITTEN AND WILL BE PRESENTED T PARTIES.
MANPOWER
SUMMARY
PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO TASK III WILL SUPPORT THIS ACTIVITY.
STATUS OVERALL TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 99% COMPLETE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE JANUARY 15, 1983 (10) o
QUALITY CONFIRf1ATION PROGRAM j
l 4
TASK VI: CABLE SEPARATION ACTION BEING TAKEN 100% INSPECTION OF SLEEVES AND CLASS IE FL00R PENETRATIONS FOR SE A.
IDENTIFICATION AND ROUTING.
INSPECT A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE ASSOCIATED CABLES TO ARRIVE AT A 95%
B.
DENCE LEVEL THAT 950 0F THE ASSOCI ATED CABLES ARE PROPERLY SEPAR(
AND CONDUITS.
CONFIDENCE LEVEL WAS NOT MET. THIS INSPECTION IS SUPERSEDED BY THE INSPECTION OF CABLE TRAYi, C.
100 INSPECTION OF CABLE TRAYS II; CATEGORY 1 STRUCTURES.
l l
100% INSPECTION OF CABLES REQUIRIfiG SEPARATION IfiSIDE PANELS AND T D.
ASSIGNED RACEWAY TO VERIFY PROPER SEPARATION AND IDENTIFICATION.
ALL CABLES INSTALLED BETWEEN THE CABLE SPREADING ROOM AND THE M i
TRACK RESOLUTION OF SIX SAMPLES OF FAILURE TO MEET CABLE SEPARATI E.
IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC.
SUMMARY
OF TASK TOTAL #
ITEMS ITEf15 PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED FMH3URS r_
AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAIN:':G WALL PEN-182 0
182 0
100 0
32 ETRATION SLEEVES (SEE NOTE B)
ASSOC.
392 0
392 0
100 0
0 CABLES TRAY SYS 1778(TR) 1688(UN) 7277(UN) 13.5 58.4 558 7614 WLKDWN (12446UN) l (SEE NOTE C)
CABLES RE-8951 CABLES 0
0 0
0 0
6357 I
QUIRING (35,804 UN)
SEP IN-SIDE PANELS (SEE NOTE D)
REVIEW OF 0
37 0
100 0
0 l
EER RESPONSES 814 778 ADMIN TOTAL 48,824 1688 7888 5.2 55.2 1372 14,781 (TR = TRAYS) i l
(UN = UNITS) l t
(1:)
r
. QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM i
TASK VI:
(CONT'D)
CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS A TOTAL OF 869 NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS HAVE BEEN WRITTEN FOR SEPARATION, ID A.
TIFICATION, AND ROUTING DEFICIENCIES. 489 NR'S DISPOSITIONED (239 REWORVs, 46 REPAIR, 204 ACCEPT-AS-IS). 218 0F THE 489 DISPOSITIONED NR'S HAVE BEEN CLOSE 12 NR'S WERE CANCELLED BECAUSE OF DUPLICATION.
368 NR'S HAVE NOT BEEN DISPOSI-TIONED.
B.
WALL PENETRATION AND SLEEVE INSPECTIONS COMPLETE. LEVEL II R RECORDS REMAINING.
THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE TO INSPECT CABLE TRAYS IN PLACE OF C C.
ASSOCIATED CABLE INSPECTION RECORDS SINCE CONFIDENCE LEVEL THE PROCEDURE FOR TRAY INSPECTION 19-QA-38 WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 24, 1982.
THE CABLE TRAY INSPECTIONS FOR THE CONTROL ROOM AND THE SERVI STRUCTURE ARE COMPLETE AND INSPECTIONS ARE BEING PERFORPID I BUILDING.
THERE ARE 4210 CABLES THAT REQUIRE INSPECTION IN THE CONTRO D.
CABLE SPREADING ROOM TO THE CONTROL ROOM.
INSPECTIONS CANNOT START UNTIL THE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS ARE FINALIZED.
E.
STATUS OF THE SIX EXAMPLES OF LACK OF SEPARATION:
(2) CORRECTED, (1) IN-PROCESS OF BEING REWORKED, (2) ACCEPTED BY ENGINEERING, AND (1) IDENTIFIED O NR.
C0!'.'iENT A MEETING WAS HELD WITH FEC, NED, GCD, QAD, AND S&L ON NOVEMBER 2, 1982 TO CLARIFY AND RESOLVE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS.
MANPOWER
SUMMARY
ACTUAL TASK COORDINATOR 1
I QUALITY ENGINEER 1
LEAD INSPECTOR INSPECTORS 4 1/2 DOCUMENTATION (NR'S & SCOPING I 1/2 PKGS) 9 TOTAL (12)
QUALITY CONFIRfMTION PROGRAM i;
~
s.
r 1
TASK VI:
(CONT'D) l i
STATUS j
55.2% COMPLETE (EXPANDED SCOPE MANHOURS).
t ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE JUNE 1, 1983 l
l 5
4 O
e a
e f
l i
(13) 4 f
- QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK VII:
NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ACTION BEING TAKEN 1001; REVIEW OF ALL VOIDED NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS (NR'S), SURVEILLANCE A.
(SR'S), PUNCHLIST AND EXCEPTION LIST ITEMS.
100'; SOLICITATION TO PAST AND PRESENT QC INSPECTORS, BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RE-B.
QUESTING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF ANY NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS NO SYSTEl1.
C.
REVIEW 300 RAf D0f'LY SELECTED, CLOSED NR'S.
I Sum ARY OF TASK TOTAL
- ITEftS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS l
OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MAfHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINI]
VOIDED NR 1318 50 1150 4
87 40 479 REVIEW INITIAL VOICED 1318 3
659 1
50 4
561 REVIEW SECONDARY SURVEILL-3500 0
3285 0
94 24 5406 ANCE RPT REVIEW (APPX)
PUNCHLIST 25,000 0
0 0
0 70 1130 REVIEW CLOSED NR 300 0
50 0
16.66 0
145 REVIEW NR'S UNKNOWN 0
0 (NO I;R'S RECEIVED THIS l'.ONTH) 8 FROM INSPECTORS I
TOTAL 31,4'36 0
5,144 0
61 146 7869 L
CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 76 NR'S WERE 50 VOIDED I/R'S WERE REVIEWED, - NO STATUS - REVIEW CONTINUING.
f A.
SENT TO HJK (TO INCLUDE 50 AS REPORTED " READY" LAST 5
50 STILL NOT RETURNED, LETTER DATED AUGUST 9, 1982.
B.
NO NR COMMITTEE HELD THIS MONTH.
70 MANHOURS WERE EXPENDED THIS PERIOD FOR DISCUS l
C.
[
l TO CLOSE OUT PUNCHLIST ITEMS.
I (14)
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK VII:
(CONT'D)
PREPARATION OF PROCEDURE (19-QA-20 REVIEW OF PUNCHLIST) I D.
PROCEDURE AND FINAL REVIEW CYCLE TO BE COMPETED BY JANUARY 1,1983.
DATE.
58 NR'S HAVE BEEN GENERATED FROM THE REVIEW OF VOICED HJ E.
REPORTS.
15 REWORK,1 REPAIR, 27 ACCEPT-AS-IS DISPOSITIONS, MANPOWER
SUMMARY
ACTUAL TASK COORDINATOR 1
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 3
4 TOTAL STATUS l
THIS TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 61% COMPLETE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE f
MARCH 31, 1983 1
9 9
(15) e
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK VIII:
DESIGN CONTROL AND VERIFICATION I
ACTION BEING TAKEN
^
PROCEDURES j
VERIFY ADEQUACY OF S&L DESIGN CONTROL AND VERIFICATION PR WERE IN PLACE AND WERE CLARIFIED.
T CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS l
THE FINAL REPORT FOR TA3K VIII IS BEING WRITTEN.
STATUS THIS TASK 15 99; COMPLETE TO DATE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1983 i
(16) m
i QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM
~
r TASK IX: DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGES j
ACTION BEING TAKEN 1.
COMPILE A COMPUTER LISTING OF ALL DDC'S.
REVIEW CG&E, HJK, S&L AND OTHER SITE CONTRACTORS' DDC'S TO DETERMINE PROPER
-2.
CLASSIFICATION.
l REVIEW CG8E, HJK, S&L AND OTHER SITE CONTRACTOR'S ESSENTIAL DDC'S TO DETERM l
3.
IF DDC'S WERE INCORPORATED IN INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION.
- l PERFORM ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS IN THE CONTROL ROOM FOR CABLE TRAY HANGERS, 4.
CONDUIT, AND CONDUIT SUPPORTS.
(ADDITION TO ORIGINAL QCP WORK SCOPE).
SUMMARY
OF TASK TOTAL #
ITEMS ITEMS PhiCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED l'A!:H3URS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THis MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAININ PHASE I 19,711 0
18,725 0
95 0
80 PHASE 11 9,111 154 3,457 1.7 38.0 435 13,423.5 PHASE IA 2,600 3
757
.1 29.1 1_
145 PHASE IIA 2,200 118 285 5.4 13.0 302 4,728.5 PFASE III D0C.
714 0
124*
0 17.3 20,.0 INSPEC.
714 123*
121*
3.3 17.0 216.0 979.0 GTHER TOTAL 35,050 298 23,469 2.2 37.2 1953-18,297 EQUIVALENT ITEMS OTHER TIME SPENT FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL ANDRESOLUTION,PROCEDUREPREPARATION, CLERICAL,PHASE
~
SETTING UP A DDC REVIEW AND HANDLING SYSTEM.
(336.0 HOURS FOR DDC SYSTEM).
i CLASSIFICATION OF CG&E, S&L AND HJK, DDC'S AS ESSENTIAL OR NONESSE t
PHASE I REVIEW INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION TO DETERMINE IF CG&E, S&L-AND HJ PHASE II -
HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AND INSPECTED.
CLASSIFICATION OF WY&B AND OTHER SITE CONTRACTOR DD PHASE I A -
NON-ESSENTIAL.
REVIEW INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION TO DETERMINE IF; WY&B AND OT PHASE IIA-CONTRACTOR DDC'S HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AND INSPECTED.
PHASE III-ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS IN THE CONTROL ROOM.
~
COM31LE COMPUTER LISTING OF DDC'S, INCLUDING DDC STATUS AND' C PHASE IV -
STATUS.
i (17) i
~
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK IX:
(CONT'D)
RESULTS 1.
IN PHASES II AND IIA, 889 DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED TO DATE FOR REPORTING VIA DOC-UMENT DEFICIENCY NOTICES OR NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS AS APPLICABLE.
l 2.
IN PHASE III, 142 DEFICIENIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO DATE FOR REPORTING VIA 1
NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS. THESE DEFICIENCIES ARE DUE TO WELD DEFICIENCIES.
[
PROBLEM / DEFICIENCY ELECT MECH STRUCT*
TOTAL 275 307 1.
li!SSING DOCUf1ENTATION 32 3
16 2.
DDC MIS-CLASSIFICATION 13 37 83 3.
INSPECTION PROGRAM 46 DEFICIENCIES & filSC.
)
4.
DDC NOT INCORPORATED 101 10 339 450 IN DOCUMENTATION 3
i 5.
INSPECTION PRIOR TO DDC 3
BEING WRITTEN (AS-BUILT) 22 30 6.
INC0ft?LETE INSPECTION 8
TOTAL 203 10 676 889
- INCLUDES WY&B UDC'S.
TO BE REIOLVED A.
TASK IX IS STILL WAITING FOR HJK TO RESPOND TO CAR'S If ORDER TO COMPLETE SOME DDC REVIEWS.
B.
A PROCEDURE / METHOD NEEDS TO BE DEVELOPED FOR VERIFYING _ AND COMPILIf G A COM STATUS LISTING OF ALL DDC'S (PHASE IV). THIS PROCEDURE NEEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH 19-QA-15 50 THAT WORK COMPLETED TO DATE FOR PHASES II AND IIA DDC/ INSPECTIO DOCUt1ENTATION REVIEWS CAN BE CHECKED FOR CORRECT DDC STATUS.
l C.
A PROCEDURE / METHOD NEEDS TO BE DEVELOPED FOR HANDLING, LOGGING, AND CONTROLLING DDC'S AS THEY ARE RECEIVED FROM DOCUMEl;T CONTROL FOR PHASES I, II, IA AND IIA.
D.
THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE CONDUIT DEAD LOADS, AS CONTAINED IN THE E-189 SERIES GENERAL NOTES, MAY BE INADEQUATE.
SUCTASK III IS STILL WAITING FOR THIS TO BE ADDRESSED BY QUALITY ENGINEERING (CER IIITIATED BY TASK IX PERSONNEL).
(IF) m
e QUALITY CONFIRHATION PROGRAM
- J d
}
TASK IX:
(CONT'D)
H i;
THE WELD INSPECTORS HAVE STATED THAT THEY CANNOT DETERMINE W b
E.
SUPPORTS WERE MADE BY THE SMAW PROCESS AND WHICH WERE MADE B AFTER THE WELDS HAVE BEEN HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED. THERE IS PRE b
DETERMINE WHICH SUPPORTS WERE FABRICATED BY THE VENDOR AND W l
HERE ON SITE. THE LATTER REQUIRE INSPECTION OF THE " SHOP" WELDS.
SUBTASK III.
I IS STILL WAITING FOR THIS TO BE ADDRESSED BY CG&E 00ALITY ENGINEER (CER i
WRITTEN BY TASK IX PERSONNEL).
SUBTASK III IS AWAITING 119 DDC'S THAT WERE REQUESTED FROM HJ F.
AND MUST BE REVIEWED FOR APPLICABILITY TO THE MAIN CONTROL ROO A LARGE NUMBER OF CONDUIT SUPPORTS IN '1HE MAIN CONTROL ROOM G.
WORK TICVITS FOR LINE REVISIONS. THE PRESENT HJK PROGRAM ONLY THEREFORE, SINCE THESE TION 0,F THE ACTUAL REVISION, AND NOT THE ENTIRE SUPPORT.
SUPPORTS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED, THEY STILL FALL UNDER 19-QA-35. THIS i
PROBLEM HAS NOT YET BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT WILL REQUIRE RESOLUTION BEFORE AL i
THE SUPPORTS CAN BE COMPLETED.
TASK IX IS GOING TO PARTICIPATE ON A STRUCTURAL DDC NR REVIEW H.
^
GOING TO BE FORMED TO FACILITATE THE DISPOSITIONING OF DOCUM CIES. THIS REVIEW BOARD NEEDS TO BE FORMED.
WAITING FOR RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS WITH X & Y DIMENSION TOLERANC,ES ON CO I.
HANGERS (CER WRITTEN BY TASK IX PERSONNEL).
WAITING FOR RESOLUTION / CLARIFICATION OF HANGER SEPARATION CR J.
SUBTASK III IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON CLARIFICATION OF WELD IN K.
AND DEVELOPING INSPECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES.
COMMENTS THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 900 DDC'S LISTED AS OPEN AGAINST THE E-189 DRAWINGS 1.
SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER DRAWINGS USED FOR THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS OF THESE LISTED DDC'S, APPROXIMATELY 200_ ACTUALLY APPLY TO MAIN CONTROL ROOM.
THE INSPECTIONS BEING PERFORMED. A SYSTEM IS CURRENTLY BE TO EFFECTIVE-ASSURE THAT ALL APPLICABLE DDC'S ARE INCLUDED IN THE INSPECTIONS LY WORK WITH SUCH A LARGE NUMBER OF DDC'S, THE SYSTEM BEING DEVELOP DETAILED REVIEW OF ALL DDC'S LISTED ON THE APPLICABLE DRA AND A LOG OF THE RESULTS.
VERIFICATION OF THE INITIAL REVIEW AND LOG ARE NOW (19)
r-OVALITY CONFIRitATION PROGRAft i
l (TASKIX:
(CONT'D)
UPON COMPLETION, INFORMATION FROM THE LOG WILL BE CATEGORIZEDl IN PROGRESS.
j
'AND COLLATED FOR EASE OF REFERENCE.
u PHASES I, II, IA, IIA MANPOWER
SUMMARY
4 ENGINEERS (INCLUDING TASK COORDINATOR) f 2
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 1
CLERKS 7
TOTAL PHASE III 3**
DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 2
INSPECTORS 5
TOTAL
- NUMBER INCLUDES PHASE COORDINATOR AND LEAD INSPECTOR.
STATUS REVIEW 0F DDC'S IS - 42% COMPLETE.
REVIEW 0F INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION - 14% COMPLETE FO REVIEW 0F ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - 175 COMPLETE.
THE OVERALL TASK IS 37.2% COMPLETE'(DOES NOT INCLUDE PH ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE PHASES I, II, IA, IIA - JUNE 30, 1983
- FEBRUARY 28,198~<
PHASF III
- BASED ON RESOLUTION OF ITEMS"D", "E", "G",
"I",
"J", AND "K" BY DECEMBER 15, 1982.
(20)
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK X: SUBCONTRACTOR /0A PROGRAM ACTION BEING TAKEN:
ALL CG&E QA AUDITS OF SUBCONTRACTORS / VENDORS HAVE BEEN IDENTIF,IED.
A.
MATRICES HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED SHOWING WHICH 10CF.R50 APPENDIX B
_B.
/
WERE VERIFIED,DURING THESE AUDITS.
AUDIT REPORTS ARE BEING REVIEWED AND SUMMARIZED ON INDIVIDUAL FOf C.
EVALUATIONS ARE MADE OF THE SCOPE AND DEPTH OF THE AUDITS TO DE D.
l WHETHER THESE AUDITS COVERED ALL APPLICABLE 10CFR50, APPENDIX B CRITERIAS IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL.
IF EVALUATIONS PROVE SUBCONTRACTORS PROGRAMS ACCEPTABLE THl 1.
CLOSED.
IF EVALUATIONS CANNOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT SUBCONTRACTOR P 2.
WERE SATISFACTORY, ALTERNATE MEASURE TO VERIFY HARDWARE INTEGRITY, SUCH AS REVIEW OF INTERNAL AUDITS PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR!, REVIEW 0F QUALITY DOCUMENTATION (INSPECTION RESULTS) TO PROVE A COVERAGE, COVERAGE IN OTHER QCP TASKS, RE-AUDIT OR HARDWARE INSPECTION AND/0R TESTING, WILL BE PURSUED.
L
SUMMARY
OF TASK TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS
- OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS l
AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING I
5 78*
0 130 B
A OR 0
80 80 l
- REMAINING 22". TO COMPLETE EVALUATION CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS PROCEDURE FOR INTERFACE WITH OTHER QCP TASKS TO VERIFY A.
THIS PROCEDURE IS BEING REWRITTEN AND WILL BE SUMITT l
DEVELOPED.
EIGHTY (80) AUDITS OF SUBCONTRACTORS WERE IDENTIFIED B.
THESE AUDITS ENCOMPASSED THIRTEEN (13) DIFFERENT APRIL 8, 1981.
OF THE THIRTEEN SUBCONTRACTORS, SIX (6) MAY REQUIRE AUDITS OF SUB FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE WORK WHICH CANNOT BE ACCOMP INSPECTION. ALL AUDITS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED. THE SCOPE ADDRESS APPLICABLE CRITERIA.
(21)
c-b
QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK X: (CONT'D)
EVALUATIONS OF THE AUDITS WILL BEGIN WHEN THE PROCEDURE FOR THIS T C.
APPROVED.
TO BE RESOLVED i
COMMENTS i
THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION IS 15 MAN DAYS WHICH INCLUD i
A.
EVALUATION OF PAST AUDITS OF SIX SUBCONTRACTORS.
IF THE SCOPE AT THIS TASK IS EXPANDED TO INCLUDE VENDORS WHICH SUPP B.
MATERIAL BUT HAVE NOT BEEN AUDITED, IT IS ESTIMATED THAT A MINIMUM 0F 10 MAN DAYS PER VENDOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE AN AUDIT.
STATUS THIS TAEK IS 78% COMPLETE.
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1983 l
l l
(22)
s QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROCRAM
/
.(
TASK XI:
AUDITS ACTION BEING TAKEN REVIEW ALL PAST CG&E QA AUDITS OF HJK, S&L, GE, NPD, NED, EOTD, AND GCD.
A.
DEVELOP MATRICES SHOWING WHICH 10CFR50 APPENDIX B CRITERIA B_.
DURING AUDITS.
SUMMARY
l TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS
- OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS !
l AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINIl-296 0
296 0
82 0
210 RV ED CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 1
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION INDICATES THAT MOST AUDITS WERE OF LIMITED SCOPE, A.
COLLECTIVELY DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER OF AUDITS PERFORMED, THE APPLICAB THERE WERE AREAS NOT CRITERIA WERE COVERED FOR HJK, E0TD, NED, GCD, AND NPD.
[
COVERED IN AUDITS OF S&L AND GE SUBSEQUENT TO APRIL 8, 1981. HOWEV l
AUDITS OF S&L AND GE HAVE COVERED THE MAJORITY OF APPLICABl PROCEDURE FOR INTERFACE WITH THE QCP TASKS TO VERIFY ADE l
B.
THIS PROCEDURE IS BEING REWRITTEN AND WILL BE SUBMITT DEVELOPED.
COMMENTS IT IS ESTIMATED THAT 30 MAN DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR T A.
AUDITS.
l STATUS THIS TASK IS 82% COMPLETE ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1983 f;
{
(23) w
9
,# s p 780 %s UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~ ' ' ^
n E
REGION lil P
%,****[j 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD o,
8 GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 JAN 1 8 1983'
!!EB10RANDUF1 FOR:
W. J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations FROF1:
James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, Region III
SUBJECT:
ZIti!!ER - ?!ONTHLY STATUS REPORT TO Cori!!ISSION i
Enclosed is the Zimmer monthly status report for December.
In an effort to issue this report in a more timely manner the QCP Status Report (provided by the licensee) will always be one month behind.
James G. Keppler Regional Administrator
Attachment:
As stated