ML20028E602
| ML20028E602 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1983 |
| From: | Perrotti D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028E600 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301280043 | |
| Download: ML20028E602 (4) | |
Text
- -.. -.. -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY Docket No. 50-382 (Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3)
TESTIMONY OF DONALD J. PERROTTI ON THE APPLICANT'S PUBLIC INFORMATION BROCHURE Q.1 Please state your name and by whom you are employed.
A.1 My name is Donald J. Perrotti.
I am employed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission ("NRC") as an Emergency Preparedness Specialist in the Emergency Preparedness Licensing Branch, Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
Q.2 Please describe the nature of the responsibilities you have had 1
with respect to nuclear power plant emergency preparedness.
l A.2 Since October 1980, I have had responsibility for the review and evaluation of radiological emergency plans submitted by licensees and applicants for licenses, in order to assure that the proposed plans meet the regulatory requirements and guidance of the l
Comission.
I also function as a Team Leader and Team Member of Emergency Preparedness Appraisal Teams engaged in the onsite inspections of the implementation phase of licensee emergency programs.
I observe nuclear power plant emergency drills and 8301200043 830126 (DRADOCK 05000382 PDR 7
l
-~
t exercises involving State and local government response agencies, and participate in interagency critiques.
For the four year period prior to the assumption of my present responsibilities, I was the lead emergency planning inspector at the NRC's Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement in Atlanta, Georgia, where I was responsible for planning, conducting and documenting inspections of licensees' emergency plans and procedures, emergency facilities and equipment, emergency training, tests and drills, and coordination with offsite support agencies.
Q.3 Have you prepared a statement of professional qualifications?
A.3 Yes. A copy was attached to my pre-filed written direct testimony on Contention 17/26, admitted into evidence in this proceeding on 1
May 7, 1982 (fol. Tr. 3229).
Q.4 Please describe the nature of the responsibilities you have had with l
j respect to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
A.4 I have served and continue to serve as the NRC Staff reviewer of the Applicant's emergency planning and preparedness.
In addition, I have coordinated on behalf of the NRC Staff with the Federal Emergency Management Acency (" FEMA") in its review of State and local emergency planning and preparedness for the Waterford facility.
Q.5 Have you examined the Applicant's proposed public infonnation brochure, entitled " Safety Information", and the color sketch l
overlay, which were admitted into evidence in this proceeding as Applicant's Exhibits 13 and 14, respectively?
A.5 Yes.
Q.6 Have you provided your comments to the Applicant on earlier drafts of its public information brochure?
A.6 Yes.
I provided my comments to the Applicant on earlier drafts of the public information brochure, which had been submitted to the NRC Staff and FEMA for evaluation.-
Q.7 Has the Applicant adequately responded to your comments in its proposed public information brochure and color sketch overlay (Applicant'sExhibits13and14,respectively)?
A.7 Yes.
Q.8 Is it primarily the role of FEMA or of the NRC Staff to review and evaluate the adequacy of the Applicant's public information brochure?
A.8 Since the public information brochure primarily relates to offsite' l
emergency preparedness, it is primarily the function of FEMA to l
review and evaluate the adequacy of the brochure.
l l
Q.9 Have you provided your comments to FEMA concerning the Applicant's public information brochure?
l A.9 Yes.
I provided my comments to FEMA on the earlier drafts of the brochure as well as on Applicant's Exhibits 13 and 14.
4 Q.10 Will the NRC Staff review the adequacy and implementation of the coordinated public infonnation and education program, including the publication and " dissemination of the Applicant's public information brochure?
A.10 Yes. The NRC Staff will review FEMA's comments on the adequacy of the brochure and the Applicant's incorporation of those comments in the brochure, prior to issuing a full power operating license for Waterford Unit 3.
The NRC Staff will also confirm the dissemination of the brochure to the residents located within the 10 mile EPZ surrounding Waterford Unit 3, prior to issuing a full power operating license to the Applicant.
m
%-e.mg.pqm,.gy,g.g.9 y.
- rny, g
og.
ww. q-q,y-gg g
qq gy 9,,y p.g yg gpo pe.
g gn, g gg7&g, g
, eg g