ML20028D497

Quality Confirmation Program Status as of Nov 30,1982

ML20028D497
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	11/30/1982
From:	Shaffer J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20028B937	List: ML20028B936 ML20028D487 ML20028D491 ML20028D497
References
NUDOCS 8301190198
Download: ML20028D497 (24)

Text

--- - -

~

t e

e

?1 i

l i'

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM STATUS l

AS OF NOVEMBER 30,1982 j

i BY J.F.SHAFFER Dl RECTOR, QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM 8301190198 830112 DR ADOCK 05000358 PDR mwvvwwse R---

QUALITY C0i;FIRMATION PROGRAM s

TASK I:

STRUCTURAL STEEL

, ACTION BEING TAKEN 100% VISUAL INSPECTION OF ACCESSIBLE STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAM F.IELD WELDS A.

ED.lSTOL SHOP WELDS, RE-ENTRANT CORNERS AND WELDED CABLE TRAY FOOT C i

100'. OF ALL BEAMS INSPECTED ARE COMPARED TO THE DESIGN DRA B.

DOCUI*ENT CHANGES (DDC'S).

1005 VISUAL INSPECTION OF HVAC SUPPORTS IN THE CONTROL ROOM.

C.

!U;'/3RY OF TASK TOTAL =

ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH-TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING 1)DRYWELL 322 0

322 0

100 0

0 LESS 525 ELV

2) REACTOR,

• 2992 293 1921 10 65 1758 2426 AUX SRV WATER ELDG

3) CONTROL RM 105 0

49 0

47 0

336 HVAC SPTS TOTAL-3419 293 2292 9

67 1758 2762 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 1.

MONCONFORMANCE (NR)

SUMMARY

QUANTITY NUMSER NR'S DEFICIENCIES DEFICIENCIES ACCEPT AREA 1:RITTEN IDE!:TIFIED D1500 SIT 10"ED AS IS REFORK REJECT REDAIF

[gp],CQUj,,,,,,,jj3,,,,,,____@_@_______,____25j,__________@,________@@________9 7 DRYWELL 281 1825 314 10 307 4 3 CONTROL RM '171('4) 2488 2331 17 2312 4 1 GALLERY STL 41 122 121 0 121 0 1 SWITCHGR 536' 4 *1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1953 1955 0 1933 0 2 SWITCQR567'5" SWITCHGR 546' 65(*8) 869 0 8 7 0 1 AUX BLD ROOF 591' 13(*1) 119 0 0 0 0 0 CABLE SPRD 546' 122(*9) 78 0 0 0 0 0 HVAC 49 1117 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1039(*23) 9546 4974 174 4768 8 23 (* ACE GENERIC) (1) t

y QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM p + TASK 1: (C0flT'D) .I MAJORITY OF THE DEFICIENCIES ATTRIBUTED T0: OVERLAP, UNDERSIZE WELD, tiOTE: U!iDERCUT, WELD' PROFILE, LACK OF FUSI 0ft, AND INCORRECT It!STALLATION. BEA!45 BEING IllSPECTED ARE COMPARED TO DESIGN DRAWING 2. CHANGESATPRESENT,TilEBEAMSTHATHAVEBEENINSPECTED,ANDbAVEGON THE DESIGil, DOCUMENT REVIEU, APPEAR ON THE DESIGN DRAWING AND/0R A DESIG l DOCU"ENT CHANGE (DDC). COM"ENTS TASK I PROVIDED INSPECTORS TO PERFORM 64 INPSECTIONS FOR TA 1. TRICAL CONDUIT SUPPORTS. THE STOP WORK ORDER #82-02 STOPPING ALL WORK ON SCAFFOLDING, PAINT REMO 2. l HAS GREATLY IMPACTED THE TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIO?iS COMPL THE RAND 0M SAMPLE INSPECTION OF 100 CONNECTIONS IN THE SEf 3 IS IN PROGRESS. DEFICIENICES NOTED THUS FAR ARE PRIMARILY COSMETIC IN NATUNE'. COMPLETION IS CONTINGENT UPON THE RESOLUTION OF ITEM 2 AB0 PRESENT MANPOWER SUM'4ARY ACTUAL TASK C0ORDINATOR 1 2 QUALITY SPECIALISTS 9 INSPECTORS 4 DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 16 TOTAL STATUS THIS TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 67% COMPLETE. EST!!%TED C0!!PLETION DATE MARCH 1,1983 (2)

QUALITY 'C,0,NFIRMATI01: PROGRAM ,j TASK II: WELD OUALITY ACTION BEING TAKEN A. PERFORM A 100% REVIEW OF CODE PIPING KE-1 WELD DATA SHEETS TO' DETERMINE WE ~ ROD HEAT NUMEERS, INSPECTION STANPS AND DATES, IDENTIFY MISSED HOLD POINTS, AND MISSING OR ALTERED DOCUMENTATION. f B. REVIEW 0F WELD PROCEDURE AND WELDER QUAllFICATION, PAST AND PRESENT.

SUMMARY

OF TASK TOTAL

• ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING 1)STRUCT.

11,000 0 11,000 0 98 0 416 KE-1 REVIEW i 2)SM BORE 32,000 0 25,841 0 79 19 818 PIPE (AFPX) 3)LG BORE 9,403 0 0 0 0 0 1373 . PIPE (380 PSK'5)

4) WELD PRO-91 12 36 8

40 104 1309 CEDURE (PROCEDURES) REVIEW 121 REV's

5) WELDER 4600 118 2574 2.5 55.9 27 1196 QUAL.

(DOCUMENTS) REVIEW 5)'.: ELD 2.0D 0 0 0 0 0 416 CONTROL TCTAL 57,121 130 39:451 .2 70 150 5528 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 1. AREA #1 CER 82-301 WRITTEN FOR AREAS OF CONCERNS ON STRUCTURAL DOCUMENTS. 2. AREA #2 REWRITE OF 19-QA-14 COMPLETE, RE0 VIRES PROCEDURE REVIEW. 3. AREA #3 PROCEDURE TO BE WRITTEN, SEE TO SE RESOLVED, ITEM #1. 4. AREA f4 36 CER'S HAVE BEEN GEf;ERATED ON PROCEDURE'S REVIEWED. 5. AREA #6 PERS0!:NEL TO PERFOR! If:VESTIGATION AND PROCEDURE WRITING, HAVE BEEN RE-CEIVED AND ARE BEING TRAlf ED DECEi;5ER 1952 TO DEVELOP PROGRAMS. (.)

y QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK II: (CONT'D) TO BE RESOLVED COORDINATION WITH HJK REVIEW FOR tiPP-1 PROGRAM TO EFFECT A COORD 1. INCLUDING ITEM (1) IN C0!otENTS SECTION. 2. C0!iFIR!! ACCEPTABLE HEAT NUMBERS ESTABLISHED BY TASK III. 3. ACCEPTANCE OF REWRITE OF 19-QA-14 BY REVIEW BOARD. MAfiPOWER SU!CiARY ACTUAL TASK. COORDINATORS I/2 O INSPECTORS DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 4 CLERKS 1/2 TOTAL. S STATUS THIS TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 70% COMPLETE. ESTIt'ATED COMPLETION Dt 5 TO BE DETERMltiED BY HJK SCHEDULE OF t PP-1/N-S PROGRAMS (T0 DATE, SCHEDULE NOT POSTED). COMPLETIO!4 0F FINAL REVIEW 0F DOCUMESTS TO 19-QA-14 FOR 1982. I 9:

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM ... s TASK III: HEAT NUMBER TRACEABILITY ACTION BEING TAKEN A. PERFORM A'100'; REVIEW OF SMALL BORE PIPING DOCUMENTATION AND' CONDUCT A FIELD WALKDOWN OF THE SYSTEMS IDENTIFIED ON THE QCP LIST OF SAFETY-RELATED AND IM-PORTANT TO SAFETY SYSTEMS. B. PERFORM A 100:: INSPECTION AND/OR REVIEW OF DOCUMENTATION OF LARGE BORE PIPING FIELD MODIFICATIONS OF SYSTEMS ON THE SAFETY-RELATED AND IMPORTANT TO SAFETY SYSTEM LIST. C. PERFOR!1 A 106: REVIEW OF ALL CODE AND STRUCTURAL PURCHASE ORDERS TO ESTABLISH A LIST OF ACCEPTABLE HEAT NUMBERS. D. PERFORM A REVIEW 0F PURCHASE ORDERS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL AND STEEL SHAPES TO DETERMINE IF PURCHASED ESSENTIAL OR NONESSENTIAL (THESE P.O.'S SHALL BE PAP,T OF ACT'I0ft C). RESULTS OF THE REVIEW WILL BE USED TO ANSWER TASK 1 CONCERNS RE-GARDIt:G ACCEPTABILITY OF STRUCTURAL STEEL. 5 PERF0.M INSPECTION AND REVIEW OF GAMMA PLUGS TO GAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR E. EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF 10CFR50.55(e) REPORT M-56. SD*. MARY OF TASK TOTAL i ITEMS ITE!1S PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS . AREA ITEP.S THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH RE'4AINING A)SM CORE 2591 ISK 0 52 0 2 14 2526 DOC SM SORE 2691 ISK 0 2691 0 100 0 0 E EU N (A0PX) B)LG BORE 3SO PSK 0 0 0 0 0 74,600* DOC (APPX) LG B03: 'oD PSK 0 0 0 0 0 WLKDWN C) PURCHASE 2728 15 59 .5 2.2 125 2826** ORDER REYW D)HJK STRCTL 1940 40 1940 2 95 30 40**o STEEL P0'S ESS/NONESS E) GAM"A PLUG 404 0 219 0 54 0 209 50.55(e)M-56 TOTAL 11,214 55 4961 2.5 40 169 80,171 (5)

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK III: (CONT'D)

• TOTAL MANHOURS SHOWN IS FOR BOTH LARGE BORE DOCUMENTATIO 1) 2)

++1!iCLUDES. STRUCTURAL STEEL P0'S IDENTIFIED IN ACTION D. 3)

• • • S". REMAINING TO COMPLETE IS TO PERFORM FINAL REVIEW.

40 MORE P0'S WERE THEYAREADDEDTOTHETOTALNU5BEROFITEMSFOR IDEfiTIFIED IN THIS CA1EGORY. l AREA C AND D. f CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS ' 15 PO'S HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND REJECTED BACK TO HJK DUE TO 1. l IN THEIR REVIEW. ITEMS COMPLETED REPRESENTS CONFIRMED PO'S ONLY. i 1940 STRUCTURAL STEEL.PURCHAS.E ORDERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED, OF THIS NUMBER, 2. APPROXIMATELY 1174 WERE ORDERED ESSE!!TIAL AND 766 WERE ORDERED NONESSENTIAL. 113 PO'S WERE BOUGHT NONESSENTIAL AND ISSUED ESSENTIAL. 3. 219 0F 404 GAMMA PLUGS HAVE BEEN INSPECTED. THE DATA HAS BEEN CG&E NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. ACTION ON THIS ITEM IS ST NED [ VALUATION. To BE RESOLVED A METHOD OF SURVEILLING THE H.J. KAISER N-S PROGRAM IS SEING R 1. ADDRESS ACTION B. ADDITIONAL PROGRAM DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED IN HJK'S R 2. TASKIIIHASDEVELOPEDACCEPTANC5CRITERIAANDIS BORE PIPING TRACEABILITY. PROPOSING ITS IMPLEMENTATION. COMMENTS THE FIGURE SHOWN FOR LARGE BORE REFLECTS AN APPROXIMATE NU'4 1. NECESSARY FOR THE QCP TO PERFORM THE LARGE BORE WALKDOWN AND ~HIS FIGURE WOULD BE MUCH LESS IF,HJK PERFORMED THIS FUNCTION AND REVIEW. 6 QCP PERFORMED A SURVEILLAliCE OF THEIR ACTIVITY. ACTUAL MANPOWER SUMMAkY 1 TASK COU'DINATOR 1 TASK LEAD 1 INSPECTORS 2 DOCUMENT REVIEWERS S TOTAL W

i . QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM '-4 ..s i TASK III: (CONT'D) 3 STATUS THIS TASK 'IS 40% COMPLETE. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE TO BE DETERl11NED AFTER COORDINATION 'WITH HJK AND CGLE DOCUMENTATIO - p I GROUP. e e O 4 (7) w m -.

l QUALITY CONFIRMAT10!i PROGRAM l TASK IV: SOCKET WELD DISEfiGAGEMENT l ACTIONS BEING TAKEN, l IDENTIFY SMALL BORE PIPING SOCKET WELDS FOR WHICH VERIF A. MENT DOES NOT EXIST. RADIOGRAPH 100% OF THE ACCESSIBLE WELD NOT HAVING VERIFIC B. MENT. SUMMA?.Y OF TASK TOTAL 4 ITEMS ITEMS PERCEfjT PERCEf;T MA! HOURS OF-COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLE1ED COMPLETED EXPE!;DED !!A! HOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE_ THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH RE!%I!:I;;G SOCKET WELD 32,000 0 29,821 0 98 0 240 IV DISENGAr,E-itENT CURREt:T ST6TUS AND RESULTS 348 RADIOGRAPHS TO DATE HAVE BE'EN TRANSMITTED TO QADVG. A. 111 SOCKET WELDS HAVE BEEN REJECTED FOR LACK OF DISENGAGEME B. 695 WELDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO DAT: AS LACKING EVIDEtiCE OF C. INSPECTION. REJECT WELDS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON NONCONFORI'ANCE REPORTS'. D. COMME!1TS PERSON!!EL Belt!G TRAINED TO PERFORM REVIEW TO 19-QA-02. 1. 2. PROCEDURE HAS BEEN REVIEWED At!D SIGNED. ACTUAL l%NPOWER SUM *%RY TASK COORDINATOR 1/2 1/2 CLERKS 2 DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 3 TOTAL (3)

QUAL.ITY C.ONFIRMATION PROGRAM r~. .y 1 TASK IV: (CONT'D) j STATUS THIS TASK IS 985. COMPLETE WITH A FINAL REVIEW TO CER 82-240 TO START DECEMBER. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE MARCH 1,1983 PENDIt;G APPROV'AL OF ENG1t!EERING EVALUATION AN ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FOR THE SECOND REVIEW IS JANUARY 31, 1983. IMPLIMENTATION OF 19-QA-02 TO EE C0"PLETED BY DECEMSER 31, 1982. i o e 1 O t 9 M.1 - ~.

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK V: RADIOGRAPHS ACTION TO BE TAKEN. A. CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING RADIOGRAPHS OF LARGE BORE PIPING SUPPLIED BY M. W. KELLOGG ARE ADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY WELD DEFICIENCIES. SUv"ARY OF TASK TOTAL # ITEMS ITEliS PER' CENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MA" HOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAIN!!F RADIOGRAPHY 4250 0 4250 0 100 0 0 REVIEW RADIOGRAPHS 46 0 ~ 46 0 100 30 10 PHASE II TOTALS 4296 0 4296 0 100 30 10 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS A. REVIER OF 4250 WELD RADIOGRAPHS FOR SENSITIVITY IS COMPLETE. B. 46 WELDS HAVE BEEN ID'ENTIFIED TO BE RE-RADIOGRAPHED, COVERING ALL VARIATION IN ~ PIPE AND WALL THICKNESS. PROGRA;1 TO CONFIRM RADIOGRAPHS HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE NATIONAL BOARD OF BOILER C. PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTORS AND'THE STATE OF OHIO. D. 46 0F THE 46 RADIOGRAPHS HAVE BEEN RE-RADIOGRAPHED, AND ACCEPTED. ~ E. MOCK-UPS OF THE 4 INACCESSAELE WELDS WERE FAERICATED AND RADIOGRAPHED. TO BE RESOLVED C0"MENTS A FINAL REPORT FOR TASK V HAS BEEN WRITTEN AND WILL BE PRESENTED TO AL PARTIEJ. MANPOWER

SUMMARY

PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO TASK III P!LL SUPPORT THIS ACTIVITY. STATUS OVERALL TASK IS APPROXIMATELY 99% COMPLETE. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE i JANUARY 15, 1983 (10)

OVALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM ... p -~ TASK VI: CABLE SEPARATION ACTION BEING TAKEN 100's INSPECTION OF SLEEVES AND CLASS IE FLOOR PENE A. IDENTIFICATION AND ROUTING. INSPECT A MIN. MUM OF 10% OF THE ASSOCIATED CABLES B. DENCE LEVEL THAT 955 CF THE ASSOCI ATED CABLES ARE ~ AND CONDUITS. CONFIDENCE LEVEL WAS NOT MET. THIS INSPECTION IS SUPERSEDED BY THE INSPECTION OF CABLE TRAYS. 1000 INSP'ECTION OF CABLE TRAYS IN CATEGORY 1 STRUCTURES C. 100% INSPECTION OF CABLES REQUIRING SEPARATION I D. THIS INCLUDES ASSIGNED RACEWAY TO VERIFY PROPER SEPARATION AND IDE ALL CABLES INSTALLED BETWEEN THE CABLE SPREADIN TRACK RESOLU ION OF SIX SAMPLES OF FAILURE TO MEE E. IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC.

SUMMARY

OF TASK TOTAL f ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED C0".PLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED mat:H AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMA WALL PEN-182 0 182 0 100 0 32 ETRATION SLEEVES (SEE NOTE B) ASSOC. 3'92 0 392 0 100 0 0 CAELES TRAY SYS 1778(TR) 1688(UN) 7277(UN) 13.5 58.4 55S 7614 WLKDWN (12446 UN) (SEE NOTE C) CAELES RE-8951 CABLES 0 0 0 0 0 6357 QUIRING (35,804 UN) SEP IN-SIDE PANELS (SEE NOTE D) REVIEW 0F 0 37 0 100 0 0 EER RESPONSES 814 776 ADMIN TOTAL 48,824 1688 7888 5.2 55.2 1372 14,73 (TR = TRAYS) (UN = UNITS) 0:)

QUALITY CONFIR!?ATION PROGRAM TASK VI: (CONT'D) CURREi!T STATUS AND RESULTS A TOTAL OF 869'NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS HAVE BEEN WRITTEN FOR SEPARATION, IDEN-A. TIFICATION, AND ROUTING DEFICIENCIES. 489 NR'S DISPOSITIONED.(239 REWORK, 46 REPAIR, 204 ACCEPT-AS-IS). 218 0F THE 489 DISPOSITIONED NR'S HAVE BEEN CLOSED. 12 NR'S WERE CANCELLED BECAUSE OF DUPLICATION. 368 NR'S HAVE il0T BEEll DISPOSI-TIONED. S. WALL PEi;ETRATION At;D SLEEVE If;SPECTI0t15 COMPLETE. LEVEL II REVIEW OF INSPECTION RECORDS REMAINING. THE DECISI0fl HAS BEEN i3ADE TO, INSPECT CABLE TRAYS IN PLACE OF CLOSING OUT C. ASSOCI ATED CABLE INSPECTION RECORDS SINCE CONFIDENCE LEVEL HAS THE PROCEDURE FOR TRAY INSPECTION 19-QA-38 WAS APPROVED ON AUGUST 24, 1982. THE CABLE TRAY IttSPECTIONS FOR THE C0 ! TROL ROOM AND THE SERVICE STRUCTURE ARE COMPLETE AND INSPECTIONS ARE Bell:G PERFORMED IN BUILDIf4G. THERE ARE 4210 CABLES THAT REQUIRE INSPECTION IN THE CONTROL R D. CABLE SPREADING ROOM TO THE CONTROL ROOM.INSPECTIONS CANNOT START UNTIL THE SEPARATI0ft REQUIREMEtJTS ARE FINALIZED. E. STATUS OF THE SIX EXAMPLES OF LACK 0F SEPARATION: (2) CORRECTED, (1) IN-PROCESS OF BEING REWORKED, (2) ACCEPTED BY El:GINEERING, AND (1) IDENTIFIED ON !!R. CO:'.'.iE NT A MEETING WAS HELD WITH FEC, NED, GCD, QAD, AND S&L ON NOVEMBER 2, 1982 TO CLARIFY'AND RESOLVE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. ACTUAL liANPOWER SUW.ARY TASK C0ORDINATOR 1 1 QUALITY ENGINEER LEAD INSPECTOR I INSPECTORS 4 1/2 DOCUMENTATION (NR'S & SCOPING 1 1/2 PKCS) 9 TOTAL (12)

Q.ALITY.C.0i1FIRIATION PROGRAM U ... :4 TASK VI: (CONT'D) \\ STATUS 55.2Y, COMPL'ETE (kXPA'4DED SCOPE MANHOURS). ~ ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE JU.'.'E I, 1983 e f ~.e e O l (H)

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM ~ TASK VII: NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ACTION BEING TAKEN 100% REVIEW 0F ALL VOIDED NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS (NR'S), SURVEILLANCE ~ A. (SR'S), PUNCHLIST AND EXCEPTION LIST ITEMS. 100'; SOLICITATION TO PAST AND PRESENT QC INSPECTORS, BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RE B. OUESTING THEIR Kf:0WLEDGE OF ANY NONCONFORfdANCE REPORT SYSTEli. C. REVIEW 300 RANDOPLY SELECTED, CLOSED NR'S.

SUMMARY

OF T/SK TOTAL i ITEf15 ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAININ f VOIDED fir 1318 50 1150 4 87 40 479 REVIEW INITIAL VOICED l'31B 3 659 1 50 4 561 REVIEW SECONDARY SURVIILL-3500 0 3285 0 94 24 5406 ANCE RPT REVIEW (APPX) PUNCHLI5T 25,000 0 0-0 0 70 1130 REVIEW CLOSED NR 300 0 50 0 16.66 0 145 REVIEW NR'S UNKNOWN 0 0 (N3 NR'S RECEIVED THIS l'.ONTH) 8 FROM INSPECTORS TOTAL 31,436' 0 5,144 0 61 146 7E59 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS 76 NR'S WERE 50 VOIDED I/R'S WERE REVIEWED, - NO STATUS - REVIEW CONTINUING. A. SENT TO HJK (T0 INCLUDE 50 AS REPORTED READY" LAST MO 50, STILL NOT RETURNED, LETTER DATED AUGUST 9, 1982. B. NO NR COMMITTEE HELD THIS MONTH. 70 MANHOURS WERE EXPENDED THIS PERIOD FOR DISCUSSIO C. TO CLOSE OUT PUNCHLIST ITEMS. 6 (1:)

QUALITY C0tiFIRMATION PROGRN4 TASK VII: (CONT'D) PREPARATION OF PROCEDURE (19-QA-20 REVIEW 0F PUNCULIST) IN PROGRESS D. DAT2. PROCEDURE AND FINAL REVIEW CYCLE TO BE COMPETED BY JANUARY 1, 1983. 58 NR'S HAVE BEEN GENERATED FROM THE REVIEW OF VOIDED HJK NR'S AND E. REPORTS. 15 REWORK, 1 REPAIR, 27 ACCEPT-AS-IS DISPOSITIONS. MANPOWER SUM"ARY ACTUAL TASK COORDINATOR 1 DOCUMENT REVIEWERS 3 4 TOTAL. ' STATUS THIS TASK IS APPR0XIliATELY 61?; COMPLETE. ESTIMATED C0:1PLETION DATE MARCH 31, 1983 m. g O e i l (15) L

~ i QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAft TASK VIII: DESIGN CONTROL AND VERIFICATION 1 p ACTION BEING TAKEN PROCEDURES VERIFY ADEQUACY'0F S&L DESIGN CONTROL AND VERIFICATION PRO WERE IN PLACE AND WERE CLARIFIED. CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS_ l THE FINAL REPORT FOR TASK VIII IS BEING WRITTEN. STATUS THIS TASK IS 99's COMPLETE TO DATE. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1983 h -o e O e e (16) ~

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM '-+ .s TASK IX: DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGES ACTION BEING TAKEN 1. COMPILE A COMPUTIR LISTING OF ALL DDC'S. REVIEW CG&E, HJK, S&L AND OTHER SITE CONTRACT 0RS' DDC'S TO DETERMINE PROPER 2. CLASSIFICATION. REVIEW CG&E, HJK, S&L AND OTHER SITE CONTRACTOR'S ESSENTIAL DDC'S TO DETERMINE 3. IF DDC'S WERE INCORPORATED IN INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION. PERFORM ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS IN THE CONTROL ROOM FOR CABLE TRAY HANGERS, 4. C0!!DUIT, AND CONDUIT SUPPORTS. (ADDITION TO ORIGINAL QCP WORK SCOPE).

SUMMARY

OF TASV, TOTAL # ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED l',A!:H3URS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING PHASE I 19,711 0 18,725 0 95 0 80 PHASE 11 9,.11J 154 3,457 1.7 38.0 435 13,423.5 PHASE IA 2,600 3 757 .1 29.1 1 145 PHASE IIA 2,200 118 285 5.4 13.0 302 4,728.5 PHASE III D00. 714 0 124* 0 17.3 20.0 It! SPEC. 714 23* 121* 3.3 17.0 216.0 979.0 GTHER TOTAL 35,050 298 23,469 2.2 37.2 1953 18,297 EQUIVALENT ITEMS OTHER TIME SPENT FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL, PROBLEM RESEARC l A!!D RESOLUTION, PROCEDURE PREPARATION, CLERICAL, PHASE III ADMINISTRATION, At:3 l SETTING UP A DDC REVIEW AND HANDLING SYSTEM.(336.0 HOURS FOR DDC SYSTEM). CLASSIFICATI0ii 0F CG&E, S&L AND HJK, DDC'S AS ESSENTIAL OR NONESSENTIAL. PHASE I ( REVIEW INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION TO DETERMINE IF CG&E, S&L AND HJK DDC'S PHASE II - HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AND INSPECTED. CLASSIFICATION OF WY&B AND OTHER SITE CONTRACTOR DDC'S AS ESSE;;TI AL PHASE IA - NON-ESSENTIAL. REVIEW INSPECTION DOCUMEi!TATION TO DETERMINE IF WYSB AtlD PHASE IIA-CONTRACTOR DDC'S HAVE BEE!! II:CORPORATED AND INSPECTED. ' PHASE III-ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS IN THE CONTROL ROOM. COMPILE COMPUTER LISTING OF DDC'S, INCLUDING DDC STATUS AND CONSTRUCTIO PHASE IV - STATUS. (17) I

j QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM TASK IX: (CONT'D) RESULTS 1. IN PHASES II AND IIA, 889 DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED TO DATE FOR REPORTING VIA DOC-UMENT DEFICIENCY NOTICES OR NONC0fiFORMANCE REPORTS AS APPLICABLE. 2. IN PHASE III, 142 DEFICIENIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO DATE FOR REPORTING VIA NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS. THESE DEFICIENCIES ARE DUE TO WELD DEFICIENCIES. j PROBLEM / DEFICIENCY ELECT MECH STRUCT* TOTAL 275 307 1. HISSING DOCUMENTATI0!! 32 2. DDCMIS-CLASSIFICATI0fj 13 3 16 37 83 3. INSPECTION PROGRAM 46 DEFICIENCIES & 111SC. 4. DDCNbTINCORPORATED 101 10 339 450 IN DOCUMENTATION 5. INSPECTION PRIOR TO DDC 3 3 BEING WRITTEN (AS-BUILT) 22 30 6. INCOMPLETE I!;SPECTION 8

• ~

TOTAL 203 10 676 889

• INCLUDES WY&B DDC'S.

TO BE RESOLVED A. TASK IX IS STILL WAITIitG FOR HJK TO RESPOND TO CAF.'S IN OF.".ER TO COMPLETE SOME DDC REVIEWS. B. A PROCEDURE / METHOD NEEDS TO CE DEVELOPED FOR VERIFYING AND COMPILING A COMPUTER STATUS LISTING OF ALL DDC'S (PHASE IV). THIS PROCEDURE !!EEDS TO BE INTEGRATED WITH 19-QA-15 50 THAT WORK COMPLETED TO DATE FOR PHASES II AND IIA DDC/ INSPECTION DOCU"ENTATION REVIEWS CAN BE CHECKED FOR CORRECT DDC STATUS. C. A PROCEDURE / METHOD NEEDS TO BE DEVELOPED FOR HAf;DLING, LOGGING, AND CONTROLLING DDC'S AS THEY ARE RECEIVED FROM DOCUME!;T CONTROL FOR PHASES I, II, IA AND IIA. D. THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE C0:.]UIT DEAD LOADS, AS CONTAINED IN THE E-189 SERIES GE!;ERAL NOTES, MAY BE INADEQUATE. SUCTASK III IS STILL WAITING FOR THIS TO EE ADDRESSEDBYQUALITYEliGINEERING(CERINITIATEDBYTASKIXPER50!;hEL). CEi L

=- QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRA!', ..Q h TASK IX: (CONT'D) n THE WELD INSPECTORS HAVE STATED THAT THEY CANNOT DETERMINE E. SUPPORTS WERE MADE'BY THE SMAW PROCESS AND WHICE WERE MADE Bf AFTER THE WELDS HAVE BEEN HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED. THERE IS PRE , } DETERMINE WHICH SUPPORTS WERE FABRICATED BY THE VENDOR AND W HERE ON SITE. THE LATTER REQUIRE INSPECTION OF THE " SHOP" WELDS. SUBTASV,III IS STILL WAITING FOR THIS TO'BE ADDRESSED BY CGLE 00ALITY ENGINEER (CER f WRITTEN BY TASK IX PERSONNEL). SUBTASK III IS AWAITING 119 DDC'S THAT WERE REQUESTED FROM HJK F. AND MUST BE REVIEWED FOR APPLICABILITY TO THE MAIN CONTROL ROO A LARGE NUMBER OF CONDUIT SUPPORTS IN THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM G. WORV, TICKETS FOR LINE REVISIONS. THE PRESENT HJK PROGRAM ONLY REQUIRES INSP THEREFORE, SINCE THESE TION 0,F THE ACTUAL REVISION, AND NOT THE ENTIRE SUPPORT. SUPPORTS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED, THEY STILL FALL UNDER 19-QA-35. THIS PROBLEM HAS N3T YET BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT WILL REQUIRE RESOLUTION BEFORE ALL THE S'UfPORTS CAN BE C0i'PLETED. TASK IX IS GOING TO PARTICIPATE ON A STRUCTURAL DDC NR REVIEW H. 50lf;G TO BE FORMED TO FACILITATE THE DISPOSITIONING OF DOCUMENTATION DEFICIE CIES. THIS REVIEW BOARD NEEDS TO BE FORMED. WAITING FOR RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS WITH X & Y DIMENSION TOLER I. HANGERS (CER WRITTEN BY TASK IX PERSONNEL). WAITING FOR RESOLUTIO!!/ CLARIFICATION OF HANGER SEPARATION CRITE J. SUBTASK III IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON CLARIFICATION OF WELD INS K. AND DEVELOPING INSPECTION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES. COMMENTS THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 900 DDC'S LISTED AS OPEN AGAINST THE E-189 DRAWINGS, 1. SPECIFICATIONS, AND OTHER DRAWINGS USED FCR THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS OF THESE LISTED DDC'S, APPROXIMATELY 200 ACTUALLY APPLY TO MAIN CONTROL ROOM. THE INSPECTIONS BEING PERFORMED. A SYSTEM IS CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED TO TO EFFECTIVE-ASSURE THAT ALL APPLICABLE DDC'S ARE INCLUDED IN THE INSPECTIONS. LY WORK WITH SUCH A LARGE NUMBER OF DDC'S, THE SYSTEM BEING DEVELOPED DETAILED REVIEW 0F ALL DDC'S LISTED ON THE APPLICABLE DRAW AND A LOG OF THE RESULTS. VERIFICATION OF THE INITI AL REVIEW AND LOG ARE NOW (19)

OUALITY CONFIRiATION PROGRAft 5 - (TASK IX: (CONT'D) UPON COMPLETION, INFORMATION FROM THE LOG WILL'BE CATEGORIZED IN PROGRESS. AND COLLATED FOR EASE OF REFERENCE. PHASES I, II, IA, IIA MANPOWER

SUMMARY

e ENGINEERS (INCLUDING TASK COORDINATOR) 4 I 2 DOCUMENT REVIEWERS [ I CLERKS 7 i TOTAL PHASE III i 3** DOCUMENT REVIEWERS ~ ~ 2 INSPECTORS 5 TOTAL

• • NUMBER INCLUDES PHASE COORDINATOR AND LEAD INSPECTOR.

STATUS REVIEW 0F DDC'S IS - 42% COMPLETE. REVIEW 0F INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION - 145 C0!1PLETE FOR INCORPORA REVIEW 0F ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - 17S COMPLETE. THE OVERALL TASK IS 37.2% COMPLETE (DOES NOT INCLUDE PHASE III). ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE PHASES I, II, I A, II A - JUNE 30, 1933 PHASE III - FEBRUARY 28, 1983*

• BASED ON RESOLUTION OF ITEMS "D",

"E", "G", "I", "J", AND "K" BY DECEMBER 15, 1982. (20)

3 - e. \\ QUALITY, CONFIRMATION PROGRAM ... i ~~ TASK X: SUBCONTRACTOR /0A PROGRAM ACTION BEING TAKEN: ALL CG&E QA AUDIT'S OF SUBCONTRACTORS / VENDORS HAVE BEE j A. 1% TRICES HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED SHOWING WHICH 10CF.RSO [ B. WERE VERIFIED,DURING THESE AUDITS. AUDIT REPORTS ARE BEING REVIEWED AND SUMMARIZED ON INDIV C. n EVALUATIONS ARE MADE OF THE SCOPE AND DEPTH OF THE AU O. WHETHER THESE AUDITS COVERED ALL APPLICABLE 10CFR50, APPENDIX B CRI IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL. IF EVALUATIONS PROVE SUBCONTRACTORS PROGRAMS ACCEPT 1. CLOSED. IF EVALUATIONS CANNOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT SUSCONTRA 2. j WERE SATISFACTORY, ALTERNATE MEASURE TO VERIFY HARDWARE INTEGRITY,$ SUCH AS REVIEW OF INTERNAL AUDITS PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTORS, REV OF QUALITY DOCUMENTATION (INSPECTION RESULTS) TO P COVERAGE, COVERAGE IN OTHER QCP TASKS, RE-AUDIT OR HARDWARE INSP AND/0R TESTING, WILL BE PURSUED.

SUMMARY

OF TASK TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT MANHOURS ! 0F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE-THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAINING 3UBCONTRACTOR S0 0 80 0 78* 0 130 CA PROGRAMS

• REIGINING 22*; TO COMPLETE EVALUATION CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS PROCEDURE FOR INTERFACE WITH OTHER.QCP TASKS TO V A.

THIS PROCEDURE IS BEING REWRITTEN AND WILL BE SU DEVELOPED. EIGHTY (80) AUDITS OF SUBCONTRACTORS WERE IDENTI B. THESE AUDITS ENCOMPASSED THIRTEEN (13) DIFFER APRIL 8, 1981. OF THE THIRTEEN SUBCONTRACTORS, SIX (6) MAY REQUIRE AUDITS O FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE WORK WHICH CANNOT BE ACC INSPECTION. ALL AUDITS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED. THE SCOP ADDRESS APPLICABLE CRITERIA. (21)

QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM .s. TASK X: (CONT'D) C. EVALUATIONS OF THE AUDITS WILL BEGIN WHEN THE PROCEDURE FOR THIS TASK IS APPROVED. TO BE RESOLVED COMMENTS l A. THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION IS 15 MAN DAYS WHICH INCLUDES i EVALUATION OF PAST AUDITS OF SIX SUBCONTRACTORS. B. IF THE SCOPE AT THIS TASK 15 EXPANDED TO INCLUDE VENDORS WHICH SUPPLIED i MATERIAL BUT HAVE NOT BEEN AUOITED, IT IS ESTIMATED THAT A MINIMUM OF 10 MAN DAYS PER VENDOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE AN AUDIT. f ~ STATUS THIS TA.SK IS 78% COMPLETt. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUAR% 28, 1983 O 4 e (22)

r QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM ...S 9, u. TASK XI: AUDITS ACTION BEING TAKEN A. REVIEW ALL PAS.T CG'&E QA AUDITS OF HJK, S&L, GE, NPD, NED, E0TD, AND GCD. B. DEVELOP MATRICES SHOWING WHICH 10CFR50 APPENDIX B CRITERIA WERE IDENTIFIED DURING AUDITS.

SUMMARY

TOTAL ITEMS ITEMS PERCENT PERCENT-MANHOURS

1. OF COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED EXPENDED MANHOURS AREA ITEMS THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH TO DATE THIS MONTH REMAININ 296 0

0 82 0 210 V BED 2g6 CURRENT STATUS AND RESULTS A. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION INDICATES THAT MOST AUDITS WERE OF LIMITED SCOPE, HOWEVER, COLLECTIVELY DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER OF AUDITS PERFORMED, THE APPLICABLE 18 CRITERIA WERE COVERED FOR HJK,,EDTD, NED, GCD, AND NPD. THERE WERE AREAS NOT ~ COVERED IN AUDITS OF S&L AND GE SUBSEQUENT TO APRIL 8,1981. HOWEVE'R, CURRENT AUDITS OF S&L AND GE HAVE COVERED THE IGJORITY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA. B. PROCEDURE FOR INTERFACE WITH THE QCP TASKS TO VERIFY ADEQUACY OF WORK HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. THIS PROCEDURE IS BEING REWRITTEN AND WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. ~ C0!"'.ENTS A. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT 30 MAN DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE EVALUATION OF THESE AUDITS. STATUS THIS TASV,IS 82% COMPLETE E_STIMATED COMPLETION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1983 (23) - - - - - - -}}