ML20028D342
| ML20028D342 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028D343 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301190005 | |
| Download: ML20028D342 (2) | |
Text
-
l 4
7590-01 2
Ut!ITED STATES NUCLEAR REGitLATORY COMMISS10H THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATDIG COMPAlY, et al.
l l
PERRY HUCLEAR PONER PLANT, U!!ITS 1 AMD 2 ORDER EXTENDIllG CONSTRUCTIO4 COMPLET10!! DATES J
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Duquesne Light Company, Ohio j
Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, and the Toledo Edison Company (collectively, the applicants) are the holders of Construction Pernits Hos.
1 i
CPPR-148 and CPPR-149 issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Co"vnission on May 3,1977 1
for construction of the Perry Huclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 which is pres-i ently under construction at the Permittees' site located on Lake Eric in Lake County, about 11 km (7 miles) northeast of Painesville, Ohio. On July 21, 1982 the applicants filed a request pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Titic 10, Part 50, Section 50.55(b) for an extension of the construction completion dates for Perry Muclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 because construction has been j
delayed due to the following factors:
1.
Projections of the growth rate in the demand for electricity have been significantly reduced as a result of the slowdown in industrial i
qrowth, increased availability of natural gas, and conservation efforts by customers. This reduced growth rate has delayed the need for the
]
capacity to be supplied by the Perry units.
2.
Numerous changes and additional requirements for plant design and analysis have been incorporated, including those required by the j
Co"rnission as a result of the Three Mile Island accident and during the course of the !!RC's regulatory review.
i I
8301190005 821229 PDR ADOCK 05000440 A
PDR su omy NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam. mi-m.oso
)
, 3.
Increasing financino requirements caused by changes in plant design, increased plant construction costs and the sustained high rates of inflation during the past several years, have increased the-difficulties in obtaining capital funds.
This action involves no significant hazards consideration; good cause has been show for the delays; and the requested extension is for a reasonable period, the bases for which are set torth in the staff's safety evaluation of i
the request for extension.
The Comission has determined that this action will not result in any significant environmental inpact and, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(d)(4), an envi-ronnental inpact statenent, or negative declaration and environnental inpact apprdisal, need not be prepared in connection with this action.
1 The applicants' letters, dated July 21, 1982 and December 1, 1982, and the NRC staff's safety evaluation supporting the Order for extension of the latest construction conpletion dates are available for public inspection at the Connis-sinn's Pubilc Document Roon,1717 H Street, N.
U., Washington. 9. C.
20555 and at the Perry Public Library, 3/35 Main Street, Perry, Ohio 44081.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the latest construction completion dates for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant be extended fron December 31, 1982 to hovenber 30, 1985 for Unit 1 (CPPR-148) and fron June 30, 1934 to November 30, 1991 for Unit 2 (CPPR-149).
Original signed by parroll G. I,inenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensinq Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance EC 2 9198d J.
/
/
y 1
.....LDy...n........D..L...
...D..L. :[.........#
D.
...R........
.. D..L..:.LB..#.. b.
%.....%....# 1 OE Omcc,
sua m e> ?.4.sh, bro,o,,: cw,,,JS te,f a no,,,,,,, g,g,,,,,,, B,JJ,r
,,,,,o d,,,TI,1,,,, a k,, ;,,,, p
,,,g,t,,,,
- 12.../..\\.M/. 8. 2......
. 1. 2.././..k/. 82.....
....1. 2../..M../. 8. 2....
...1. 2...
8..2.........1. 2....... 8. 2.....
..1 1 /. 8. 2.......
onep OFFIClAL RECORD COPY
/
use.m m i-.m.em NRC FORM M 00-80) NRCM Dm
~
.-