ML20028C842
| ML20028C842 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/12/1982 |
| From: | Jay Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Dezutel C ZACK CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028C843 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900785 NUDOCS 8301140211 | |
| Download: ML20028C842 (3) | |
Text
_
..m 1
t g
N1r 1982
~
s
-Docket No.- -99900785/82-01 a
The Zack Company ATTN: Mrs. Christene Zack'DeZutel President 4600 W. 12th Place Chicago, Illinois 60650
^
Gentlemeni This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. L. E. E11ershaw'of this office on August 3-6, and September 10, 1982, of your facility at Cicero, Illinois, associated with the manufacture of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and to the discussions'of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
This inspection was conducted as a result of the receipt by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of allegations pertaining to implementation and enforcement of The Zack Compan qualit assuranceprogram,andwasperformedinconjunction with an investi ation b the Chicago Field Office of the NRC Office of Investigation.
S in NRC Report No.pecific findings pertaining to the allegations are contained 99900785/82-02.
The main purposes of this inspection were to assist the investigative staff in the evaluation of identified concerns, and to establish whether HVAC system manufacture was consistent with applicable codes, contractual, and regulatory reguirements.
QA pr~ rammatic areas relating to the allegations were selected for inspection and inciuded welding process control, nonconformances and corrective action, audits, indoctrination and training, document control, QA records, procurement document control, welder qualification, and implementation of 10 CFR Part 21.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
6
/t.0 9
R& CPS C:R& CPS BC:VP ADOS D:E RA V
LEEllershaw/r IBarnes UPotapevs RU a1 rt EHJohnson 11 ins
/23/82 jfl9/d3/82 9
/82 9/g/2 19/&/82 j
82 8301140211 821012
~,\\v yv
)
PDR GA999 ENVZACK 99900785 PDR
,s
m, yyy 7
3:
=,
. p;,
~
S ;. j;f ) )
, yl '
~
x 1
~
~
n r *m./ 3. ( W
'Y&
l
- +
(_-
y p
-
- i The'Zack Company:
-2 x
- Please provide us within~30 days from the"date
- of thisDietter.a' written state-=
mentcontaining:-(1)--adescriptionofstepsthathavebeenorwillbetakento
~ correct these 1tems; (2) a description of steps.that have been or will be taken
.topreventrecurrence;.and(3)the-dateyourcorrectiveactionsandpreventive measures were or will be completed.m. Consideration may:be_given to extending;
.your response time for a good _cause;shown.
s Theresponserequestedbythisletterisnotsubjecttotheclearancepro-cedures of the Office of ManagementLand Budget as r'equired by the Paperwork
-Reduction Act-of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's' regulations,1a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will:be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room..-If this report contains any(4), it-is necessary that-you-information that you believe to be.
exemptfromdisclosureunder10CFR9.5(a)
(a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date'of this-letter _of your intention to file a reguest for withholding [and within25 days'fromthedate'ofthisletterawrittenapplication(b) submit
~
to this office to withhold such information.
If your-receipt of.this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review 'please notify this office' promptly so that'a new due date may be established.
Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1),'any such application must be accompanied -.
by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which: identifies the document or part sought to be withheld and which contains a-full statement of thereasonsonthebasiswhichitisclaimedthatthe'informationshould.be withheld from public disclosure. -This section further requires;the statement-toaddresswithspecificity_theconsiderationslisted~in10CFR2.790(b)(4h
-The information sought to be withheld shall-be incorporated as far as possible-into a separate part of the affidavit.
If we'do not' hear from you in this-regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the'Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to..
discuss them with you.
-Sincerely, Oirfclnal' signed by J.ohe L Collina.
John T. Collins Regional Administrator
Enclosure:
1.-
' Appendix A - Notice.of Nonconformance 2.
Appendix B - Inspection Report No.-99900785/82-01 3.-
AppendixC-InspectionDataSheets(6pages) x l
'l v
(
. 7-.
4 n....
v
-op
o The)Zack Company bec:
'IE' Files F
AE0D
,QAB
-NRC:PDR
. Rec. Administrators, I, II,-III, IV,' V
-EH ohnson, RIV
.RLBangart, RIV.
O 9
w-g.
1
- 'y a
1
+
6 i
e i
........ -.. ~...
-