ML20028B583
| ML20028B583 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1982 |
| From: | Maurin L LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Jay Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, 92, W3I82-0107, W3I82-107, NUDOCS 8212030048 | |
| Download: ML20028B583 (2) | |
Text
~
.f*
f.
.a
+
u,
_OUISI AN A f u2 oct onot S1ncer i i
POWER & LIGHT / P O BOX B000
- NEW ORLEANS. LOUISIANA 70* At. (504) 366 2345
$NNIYS L. V; MAURIN November.22, 1982.'
' vice President Nuclear Operot%s W3I82-0107 j
Q-3-AJ5.07 t
Mr. John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 d s, Arlington, Texas 76012 i
SUBJECT:
Waterford SES Unit No. 3 I
Docket No. 50-382 Potentially Reportable Deficiency No. 92
" Design of the Maintenance Hatch Shield Door Scal System" Final Report
REFERENCE:
Telecon from M. A. Livesay (LP&L) to L. Martirs (NRC) on October 19, 1982 s
\\
Dear Mr. Collins:
r On October 19, 1982 a problem with the design of the maintenance hatch shield door seal system was reported to your office as Potentfally Reportable Deficiency #92. This letter is to inform you that after further eraluation, this specific problem is not considered to be repor::abiq purslant to the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e) for the following reas7n:
1 As originally designed and soproved for constructiot, the Maintenance Hatch Shield Door (MHSD) Seal System was a single non-qualified (i.e., non-safety-related) air supply system to maintain the MHSD itflatable seals. Prior to delivery of the non-safety-related equipment, the question of acceptability of the original design was raised in Construction Engineering Information Request IC-244.
It was concluded that the apprcred design was not 9dequate and that the system would have to be upgraded to a safety -related design. As a result, a design change was initiated to revise the system to a safety-related design.
i The NRC was notified o f the condition because a non-safety-ralated seal system control panel was received on site.
This condition has ben determined to be not reportable because the design change was initiated prior ^to receipt of the panel and it was not installed. The non-safety-related systen did not represent the final design. All equipment instc11ations will be based on the new safety-related design.
Very truly yours,
[
7 8212030048 821122
/g g::
PDR ADOCK 05000382
~
S PDR L. 'i. Maurin
/
LVM/ MAL:keh l
f -(,
i s, g~,.
- f, et t
Mr. John T. Collins W3182-0107 Page 2 s
5 cc: Director Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012 h?
s
\\,
Director Office of Management U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012 s
E. Blake t
's s
4 W. Stevenson b
5
'.',a g
,, i u,
- s I'
}
t 4
/
6 s
,