ML20028A381
| ML20028A381 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1982 |
| From: | Doolittle E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8211190338 | |
| Download: ML20028A381 (3) | |
Text
[
l DIST:
. Document controla(STN 50s546/547),
NRC PDR PRC System NOV 91982 LB#1 Rdg.
MRushbrook BDoolittle TNovak Docket Nos.: STN 50-546 and STN 50-547 flEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing, NRR THRU:
B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No.1, DL Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL FROM:
E. L. Doolittle, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
SALP - MARBLE HILL NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 Attached is the final NRR SALP input for Public Service Company of Indiana.
This report is based primarily upon the Project Managers evaluation, since there were no significant licensing activities involving NRR technical review branches during this SALP evaluation period.
I4 l
E. L. Doolittle, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing l
Attachment:
As stated cc w/ attachment:
T. Tambling, REG-III 8211190338 821109 PDR ADOCK 05000546 I
\\
G PDR
/t 11 A
./
D.L.;.'
D(,-
[
omcc>
- B.J.,Y.g...o..o..d.
.T.M.,.o..Va.k./....
3.g.,yyg.g...l..e./.1. !
$URNAME)
.g 3 our>
anc ronu m oomscu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usam msnuo
c
.s fi
/
NRR IUPUT TO SALP EVALUATION FOR MARBLE HILL 1/2 (CONSTRUCTION PHASE) COVERING THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 1, 1981 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1982 FUNCTIONAL AREA 8 - LICENSING ACTIVITIES ANALYSIS Management Involvement in Assuring Quality / Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives Evidence of prior planning and assignment of priorities has been consistently' demonstrated by the applicant in the preparation of the FSAR and ER for the OL application. The applicant plans to submit the Marble Hill OL application on December 1,1982 as scheduled.
PSI management prcmptly responded to a new rule,10 CFR 50.34(g), published on fiarch 18, 1982, which required the applicant to include additional information in the FSAR' submittal.
The applicant met with NRR and subsequently initiated a program to supply this information for the FSAR on a schedule commensurate with the NRR license review schedule.
Additionally, following NRR request, the appli.
cant met with the staff to discuss this program. The program ap'peared to be both techgigally sound and thorough.
The applicant also initiated early discussions with the staff regarding its Pre-operational Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program and its emergency planning sub~mi ttal.
PSI has shown strict adherence to its procedures and policies regarding repli-cation of Byron.
Its policy concerning the format ar.d centent of the F5AR has i
been well stated and is understandable.
During meetings with IIRR, PSI reaffirmed I
'its intent to hold liarble Hill design changes to a minimum as directed in a letter to Dr. James Coughlin of PSI frel Ben C. Rusche, Director, NRR, dated November 3, 1975. The epplicant makes frequent efforts to review and discuss its policy of replication of Byron with msmbers of the staff involved with Marble Hill.
Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety Standpoint There was no basis for evaluation of the applicant's performance during this SALP period.
e
8 1,
- j/ * -
/
Enforcement History This item not applicable to licensing activities in HRR during construction phase..
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events This item not applicable to licensing activities in HRR during construction phase.
Staffing (Including Management)
PSI staffing is ample as indicated by its ability to meet the scheduled date for submittal of the OL application. Positions and authority are well defined.
~
, Training and Qualification Effectiveness This item not applicable to licensing activities in HRR during construction phase.
CONCLUSION PSI is rated in Category I for Licensing Activities.
4 a
a O
r
,r
_-__7.___
,_-c. - - -
y_--
---,