ML20027E842
| ML20027E842 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/21/1982 |
| From: | Phillips H, Alexandra Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027E832 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900113 NUDOCS 8211160244 | |
| Download: ML20027E842 (6) | |
Text
ORGANIZATION:
ITT BARTON INSTRUMENTS CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:
99900113/82-03 DATE(S):
7/14-16/82 ON-SITE HOURS:
14 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
ITT Barton Instruments ATTN: Mr. T. J. Shideler General Manager 900 South Turnbull Canyon Road City of Industry, California 91749 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. D. J. McClain, P. E., Quality Assuit 353 Project Engineer TELEPHONE NUMBER:
(213) 961-2547
~
PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Process Control Instrumentation NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The current Nuclear Class IE Equipment produced by ITT Barton is approximately 10% of the total annual sales.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
AO-70-11.,
Alva L. Smith, Equipment Qualification Section, (EQS)
Date OTHERINSEPCTOR(S):
APPROVED BY:
h NWN H. S. Pfifllips, Chief, EQS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B B.
SCOPE: This inspection was performed to observe the Equipment Qualification.
Testing of models 763 and 764 pressure transmitters in accordance with IEEE-323-1974 and NUREG 0588, Revision I which included procedure review, review of purchase orders for other test facility services, observation of functional testing after the 85-day post loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) test and disassembly of two components, and review of test documentation.
PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: The pressure transmitters are currently being tested for l
use at the Waterford Nuclear Site, Docket No. 50-382.
95S10 g g ti n ' -
8211160244 e21028 PDR GA999 ENVITT 99900113 PDR
ORGANIZATION:
ITT BARTON INSTRUMENTS CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT INSPECTION N0.:
99900113/82-03 RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Test Procedure Evaluation A copy of revision 2 of ITT Barton Test Procedure 999/3154.2," Design Qualification Test Procedure for ITT Barton Models 763 Gage Pressure and 764 Differential Electronic Transmitters for Class IE Service In Nuclear Power Plants," was furnished to the NRC inspector. A brief review of this procedure was made during the inspection to determine if actual testing complied with the procedure. All testing and disassembly re-viewed and witnessed by the inspector was accomplished in accordance with this procedure.
A more detailed review of the above procedure to determine compliance with criteria specified in the applicabie IEEE standards is being performed and will be reported separately.
2.
Test Specimen Selection ITT Barton dccumentation was reviewed and employee interviews were con-i ducted to determine how the test specimens were selected. This was necessary to determine that the specimens selected for generic qualifica-tion testing were standard proiuction line and that no special care or considerations were taken in tt:e selection of the materials, the manu-facturing process or the production testing other than those normally specified and required by ITT Barton. Based on the results of this portion of this inspection, the NRC inspector determined that the specimens being tested represented typical " production line models.
3.
Quality Assurance Program l
For this particular qualification test program ITT Barton chose to have l
the radiation aging accomplished at the Georgia Institute of Technology; the seismic testing at the Southwest Research Institute, and the LOCA l
1
1 4
ORGANIZATION:
ITT BARTON INSTRUMENTS CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA I
REPORT INSPECTION NO
- QQ900113/82-03 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 3 testing at the Westinghouse Electric Corporation. The NRC inspector reviewed the ITT Barton procurement documents issued to all three firms to assure that the applicable quality assurance requirements were suit-ably included and/or referenced in these documents for the particular services and in all three cases they were.
In addition to the above, ITT Barton Quality Assurance conducted audits of each of the three firms and these audit reports were reviewed.
It was determined that these audits were conducted in accordance with ITT Barton procedures.
4.
Witnessing of Test After completion of the 85-day post-LOCA test conducted in-house at ITT i
Barton, the test specimens were removed from the chamber and calibration checks, time response tests, overrange and safe pressure tests were all completed. One model 763 transmitter (S/N 1061) and one model 764 transmitter (S/N 327) were randomly selected for disassembly. Both transmitters were completely disassembled and visually and dimensionally inspected. No abnormalities were noted during the disassembly.
After completion of this inspection both units were placed in bonded storage.,
After canpletion of the 85-day post-LOCA test, the specimens were functionally tested in accordance with paragraph 7.4.12 of the test pro-cedure. Three of 12 specimens (specimens 763-412, 763-1001, and 764-363) did not respond to input pressures; therefore, time response testing, in accordance with paragraph 7.4.12 of the test procedure, was not l
accomplished on these three specimens.
ITT Barton was in the process of issuing a Notice of Deviation for those specimens which failed to respond. The NRC inspector will follow up n this item during a future inspection.
(8203-01).
5.
Test Documentation The test reports issued by the firms conducting the radiation, seismic, and LOCA tests, as well as the ITT Barton "real time" quality assurance test witness logs were reviewed. All reports and logs were in accordance with the applicable procedures and did not contain any unexplained anomalies.
l
Inspector A. L. SM 17#
I Docket No.99900ll3 i
Report No. rz.oy Scope / Module E O DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
.4 1
3 TesicA/ ouuncATion Tc57 PeocE'baet m Irr SAST*" * **
ih t ot 2L3 GAGE Petssett Amb ?G+ 'DiffERENYML PEES $WAE Ed.sc7Ackr c TRAnasM m Dr-S Fot class 1E SCAVICE w NMCLEAR. Resutit PLAA TS 2
S
.r Y T 84troA/ PURCHASE ofbtn 4497t To GEctsin insis7urc 9/t1 or Ternwocos y 3
S~
r7T BAA7av PytcHASE C&CA. 49619 79 Sou7NwCs7 LESEncM Zws7s7urE
/l/r/
~
4-f
.rTT gntten Peternst ot2>EA-3121 7 To MFs7'nsNon'sE ELEcTRoc corp.
2/st 8
.ZTT BARTON ENGtA/CEdwG 4ertavof #46 L (106-8004 Fed MAb/ATIen/
-L.ocA Yes73 wiracssE2> 91 zrr A T GEcAGtA TEctf { wES7u+NouSE)
(*
3
.TTT GAE Loc-Book 2019 Fett SEismoc rEsr AT' SatrNsesr REscAte M 7
8 croszuA 'reen A?stse r
.+4 9n Grg/-G-4s r afts f ri 8
9
'.T77 7tip AEFCAT OA/ $WAUTY SygvE1 Cod >UCTEb A-T 66026/4 TEeH yjo jes 9
7
.t T T VEnbod. Auhrf / C val MNt~to^! REPBAT o A/
StuTHwe st R6scatcy gQoGy n
lo 8
TTT cormonT1 caectuST, ENVitewENTAL 'TGST 4 4getArentFs, OLAss
vt/o7lg s 11 g
Sournsutst eEse ten rusrirurg gERw.T~ o 2-L'!?2 - 3o8 " SEtsm o c
//g t-s QUAL lytckTtou TEST 9-cron:t yn sToso PRessua6 susrauments HobEE S 7G1,
>t.A.-oso, 76 4- ~ 3 7 s, f ns-xias "
%+ 4 rs5 WN
> ss-r os e, s
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)<
Inspector
- 4. L. SA, s rd l,
Docket flo. 979sois3 Report No. az-03 s
Scope / Module EC DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 gL 8
SouTMwE ST RESEAACH INS 7s7t47E REPoAT O 2 - 6 7 1'l-So t SEISh ! C tif4'l QtsALsFICAT104/ 7'ES7 REPoxr BalleMs PREssc/AE /NS7xwME475 M eksL3 7 s%2 % s/s 7s 3-so cs,
> &3- +s z, ~r 4 3 - C, vs +- 3ss, pc,+ - 7,r-o o s, 14+- 7 i t-e/ 0, 764-12,*
6 8
Q)ES T/4G-HearE ELECTA /C CDQ. TEST A'Ef%e r ' l-CCA
'T E S T/ 4 0-T/t e/f L or g4xtow 7xessvas rA'sesnonses ~
A-Y HI -ret. f ABORATCRJE3 R EPCAT
- 40. l'/L -O 3 21 7 7 b/l2t-15 9
.rTT s'1EcnAMCA L Fon sr.Z tem ccM?uAME CHECKU57 Mo'b E' L
~
-76 3 S)L1 M t.
(b 8
Z T7' h rss JMod FOAL El ecTxavic 'T'/A^dm e'T7tet, '2>siv.
~
PRESSe/AA l'40'D EL
?L+
f
.% A/ 374 Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) l
o PERSONS CONTACTED Company ITT BARTod INSTAuMw13 Dates 7//4-is/rz bocket/ReportNo. 499 001/3/f 2-o3 Inspector A. l. S/'f / TM Pagei of J
NAME(Plasse Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
Eb ROM O AtGR,, TLAA$A:nte.iarsit. BEVEL.
I TT LowELL LC1RCg SR, pre 1Eci G NHucEtt.
37y
'bou Ag CLAIAl QA Pfl0TEc7 ENStvEEAl-ZTT RoWARb SnoR.T QA ENHA/6EL ZTT E. T. rom eect PgosecT EhkUEEA~
EBASco t
1 f
,