ML20027D554
| ML20027D554 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/20/1982 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Campbell R ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| REF-WM-39 NUDOCS 8211080038 | |
| Download: ML20027D554 (2) | |
Text
f,*
itf2tlRIPHHMm=33m467
/
DISTRIBUTION SEP 2 01982 PDR W1 Project File 39 39/SEP/82/09/10/0 WMUR r/f WMUR w/f v ;;p,1" ]q NMSS r/f VJ ef1 SEPantell WMUR:SEP ggg JJLinehan E Gat KJHamill WM-39 (Eeturn to M. 623-SS BNixon RAScarano
~ ' ~
DEMartin Mr. Richard H. Campbell, Project Manager HJPettengill UMTRAP Project Office RDSmi th Albuquerque Operations Office REBrowning U.S. Department of Energy JBMartin i
P.O. Box 5400 BFisher
{
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115
Dear Mr. Campbell:
In response to your September 2, 1982 letter requesting input for the FY-1982 Annual Status Report to Congress on the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Program, we are providing by Attachment I to this letter the requested brief sumary of significant FY-1982 NRC actions in the program.
If you have any questions regarding this input, please contact Kathleen J. Hamill (FTS 427-4115) of my staff.
Sincerely, Original Signed by(
B. A. Scarano Ross A. Scarano, Chief Low-Level Waste Branch Division of Waste Management
Enclosure:
As Stated CC:
Robert W. Ramsey, Jr., DOE:HQ w/ encl.
/
0FC WMUR WMUR FCUF WMLL /
_____:_________y:____________:____g_____:___________:____________:____________:___________
NAME : SEPantell:dg KJHamill:WATiixon
- RAScarano BATE l82fb9f1b !
hfo b:
p 7
8211000038 820920 PDR WASTE WM-39 PDR
, ;;% ~
3 ATTACHMENT I NRC INPUT TO FY-1982 UMTRAP ANNUAL STATUS REPORT TO CONGRESS For the period October 1, 1981 through September 30, 1982 the NRC participated in and completed the following significant actions related to the D0E's execution of the UMTRAP:
1.
The NRC provided comments on the DOE Technical Criteria for UMTRAP disposal site selection.
2.
The NRC concurred in the DOE Final Remedial Action Concept Papers for the Durango, C0 and the Salt Lake City, UT UMTRAP processing sites, concurred in a revised Remedial Action Concept Paper for the Cannonsburg, PA processing site, and provided comments on the. Draft Remedial Action Concept Paper for the Shiprock, New Mexico processing site.
3.
The NRC reviewed and commented on the Preliminary Draft Environmental Impact Statements for the Cannonsburg and Salt Lake City sites.
4.
The NRC concurred in the designation of approximately 100 Salt Lake City vicinity properties. NRC will review and concur in the individual remedial action plans for those vicinity properties identified as unusually significant. NRC comments were provided on the DOE Draft Environmental Assessment for remedial action at the vicinity properties.
Comments were also provided on the DOE Draft Radiological and Engineering Assessment for the Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility, a high priority vicinity property.
5.
The NRC continued to concur in the designation of vicinity properties near the Cannonsburg, PA processing site.
6.
The NRC reviewed DOE-funded research and development projects in order to coordinate the DOE efforts with NRC-sponsored research on uranium tailings disposal.
7.
The NRC concurred in the remedial action Cooperative Agreement between DOE and the State of Colorado.
1