ML20027C747

Transcript of 821006 Public Meeting Re Status of Staff Certification on Licensee Compliance W/Restart Requirement on TMI-1 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-34

ML20027C747
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	10/06/1982
From:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8210270188
Download: ML20027C747 (34)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:r s N't RENTORY COM!CSSICN (- g-L n ( COMMISSION MEETING J I:1 t :s Matt:s cf: PUBLIC MEETING STATUS OF STAFF CERTIFICATION ON LICENSEE COMPLIANCE WITH RESTART REQUIREMENT ON TMI-l ( now; October 6, 1982 m.. 1 '34 g: Washington, D. C. i l k, MTO-ALDK%N ( 400 vi_T d a Ave.., S.K. Wi=H' s 9, D. C. 20024 ( Talaphc=a : (202) 554-2345 8210270188 821006 PDR 10CFR PY9.7 PDR

o 1 0 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 /^ 4 STATUS OF STAFF CERTIFICATION ON LICENSEE 5 COMPLIANCE WITH RESTART REQUIREMENT ON THI-1 6 7 PUBLIC MEETING 8 9 Room 1130 1717 H Street N.W. 10 Washington, D.C, 11 Wedne sd a y, October 6, 1982 '12 The Consission convened on the above-entitled 13 matter at 3:05 p.m., pursuant to notice. 14 BEFORE: 15 NUNZIO PALLADINO, Chairman VICTOR GILINSKY, Commissioner 16 JOHN AHEARNE, Commissioner THOMAS ROBERTS, Commissioner 17 JOHN ASSELSTINE, Commissioner 18 STAFF AND PRESENTERS SEATED AT COMMISSION TABLE: 19 S. CHILK, Secretary L. BICKWIT, General Counsel 20 D. EISENHUT, NRR B. JACOBS, NRR 21 R. JARUSDICKI, Region I 22 23 24 k.. 25 \\.... ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

o ' j. s DISCLAIMER This is an ' unofficial' transcript of a meeting of the United States _ Nuclear Regulatory Commission held on Octobei 6, 1982 in the Co= mission's offices at 1717 H. Street, N. W., Wasnington, D. C. The meeting was open to public attendance and observation. This transcript has not been reviewed, corrected, or edited, and it may contain inaccuracies. The transcript is intended solely for general infomational puroeses. As provided by 10 CFR 9.103, it is not part of the forinal or infomal - record of decision of the matters discussed. Expressions of opinion in .this. transcript do not necessarily reflect final deteminations or beliefs. No pleading or other paper may be filed with the Qommission in any proceeding as the result of or addressed to any'orize. statement or argument (- contained herein, except as the Comission may auth O e e 9 9 1

2 ~ 1 EE1EEEEIEEE 2 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: The meeting vill please 3 come to order. 4 The subject of the meeting this afternoon is 5 the Status of Staff Certification on Licensee Compliance 6 with Restart Requirements in THI-1. 7 As you will recall, on August 9, 1979, the 8 Commission issued an order to the Licensee for THI-1 9 requiring, among other things, accomplishment of certain 10 requirements as a condition for restart. These actions 11 were required to be completed to the satisfaction of the 12 Director of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

However, 13 the order required the Staff to certify their 14 satisfaction to the Commission, and the Staff is here 15 today to discuss the status of their certification 16 activities.

17 Since the s'ubstantive matters of the items to 18 be discussed today are still before the Commission in 19 the TMI-1 proceeding, I would General Counsel to advise 20 us at any time if I discuss must be curtailed or 21 modified due to ex parte considerations. 22 Before we start, I believe it would be 23 appropriate to ask General Counsel to briefly outline 24 the nature of the issued that can or cannot be discussed (. 25 here today. N... ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

3 o (~ - 1 Unless the Commissioners have other comments, 2 I suggest we hear from Mr. Bickwit, and then turn it to (,_ 3 the Ste.ff. 4 MR. BICKWIT: Speaking generally, where the 5 Board has dec'ided on a given requirement, subject to 6 Staff certification of that requirement, th en th e 7 adequacy of the certification and questions relating to 8 that matter can be discussed here. But the adequacy or 9 visdom of the raquirement itself ought not to be l 10 discussed. 11 As in the case of the 0737 items, the Board 12 has deferred to Staff and the Commission on matters 13 which would normally be regarded not as mere 14 implemen tation items, but as basic questions involving 15 what the requirements ought to be and when they ought to 16 be instituted, the Commission is free to discuss those 17 matters with the Staff, the matters on which the Board 18 has deferred to the Staff and the Commission. Where 19 mjttters' ara outside the scope of the proceeding, th e 20 Commission and the Staff are free to diccuss the 21 matter. 22 In short, where the matter is one on which the 23 Board has decided, the matter ought not to be the 24 subject of discussion at this meeting, and anything is 25 f air game. s ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

4 o r 1 COHHISSIONER GILINSKYa Now what does that 2 sean? 3 HR. BICKWIT4 Do you want examples? 4 COHHISSIONER GILINSKY: Giva me an example. 5 Is that going to af f ect anything that Mr. Eisenhut is 6 going to say? 7 HR. BICKWIT: No. 8 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY: I must confess that I 9 didn 't follow that. 10 3R. BICKWIT It is a very complicated 11 proceeding, and it is a com plicated instruction, so we 12 will monitor it closely. 13 COMMISSIONER GILINSKT: All right. 14 HR. BICKWIT Perhaps the easiest thing is to 15 repeat the guidance. 16 (General laughter.) 17 HR. BICKVIT I will give you an example with 18 each. 19 COHNISSI-ONER GILINSKY: Why don't we just go 20 o n. 21 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: May I suggest that the 1 22 b e s t way to get the examples is to go on. 23 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY: Wave your arms if you 24 think we are getting into a problem. 25 dR. BICKWIT I far prefer that. '+ \\ A ALDERSON REPORTING CCMPANY,INC, 1 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

5 ( 1 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO Okay, then,-why don't we 2 proceed. I guess the meeting goes to Darrell Eisenhut. 3 HR. EISENHUT Thank you. 4 Ccould I Lave the second slide, I guess it 5 is? 6 (Slide.) 7 In response to the Commission's request, we 8 are going to go through today a listing of the status of 9 the certification items and then at the end of that we 10 will go through briefly the overall status of a number 11 of other items that remain to be completed on this plant 12 also. 13 If I could have the next slide. 14 (Slide.) 15 We find, based on the record in this case, 16 limiting the certification to the short-term 17 requirements as identified in the August 9, 1979, order 18 and the March 8, 1980, order, and any item the Board has l 19 imposed as being a short term requirements that must be 20 certified prior to any decision. l ( 21 'The obvious prerequisites for this are that 22 first the utility has to complete the item, and then 23 after they have completed the item either Region I, ICE 24 headquarters in the area of emergency preparedness, or f 25 NRR will either inspect or verif y as appropriate the ,t ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345 m

1 6 1 various items. At the conclusion of that, we would 2 reach the point where we would certify that all 3 outstanding items have been done. 4 (Slide.) 5 The next slide is a summary. Ac tua lly, the 6 next two slides could be looked at either way. Perhaps T I could go to the next slide, it would be a little 8 easier. If I could go to the next slide please. 9 (Slide.) 10 This is a breakdown of how you get 129 items. 11 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Incidentally, there was a 12 statement on your pre eding slide that I thought was 13 important to highlight. I think 'it is the second item.. MR. EISENHUT I will come back to that 14 15 slide. It is'a little easier perhaps to do them in the 18 order if I could. 17 CHAIRHAN PALLADINO: Thank you. 18 MR. EISENHUT To try to characterize what the 19 129 items are and where they came from, we have together 20 this little matrix. The number of items flowing from 21 the items in the order or the Board decision follow 22 pretty straightforward. Under items II A, B,C, and D, i 23 those are the four partial decisions from the hearing 24 record. 25 Th e next thing on th e table is the status as L t ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

7 1 ve see it, and this is the status as of a couple of 2 weeks ago from the utility at which time he had 93 3 complete. Appraciate that the numbers here evolve and 4 change as time goes on, as he completes more and more 5 items. 6 The NBC is reviewing these, as I indicated, 7 either Region I, or ICE in the area of emergency 8 preparedness, or NRR. The status of the NRR review is 9 on the right-hand side, where you see that we have now 10 com pleted 6 5. 11 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: That is as of several 12 weeks ago ? 13 MR. EISENHUT: That is as of a couple of weeks 14 ago, yes. 15 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Is there clear 16 understanding on who has responsibility? 17 MR. EISENHUT: Yes, there is. 18 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: Between the region and 19 NRR 7 20 MR. EISENHUT: Yes, there is. We, in fact, 21 have an overall matrix that includes not only the 22 Certification items but other items that don't need to l i 23 be certifiad. Rich Jurasdicki is here with me today l ( 24 from Region I, who is in fact implementing the Region I ( 25 aspects. We do have representatives here today from ICE (/ l ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. O.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345 1

8 1 in the aren of emergency preparedness. 2 I think there is a pretty standard 3 understanding that has been circulated and approved by 4 all the Staff. The list gets very, very large when you 5 look at the total number of items, not just the 6 certification items. 7 If I could go back now to the previous slide. 8 (Slide.) 9 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY: Could you explain that 10 remark? 11 MR. EISENHUT: Yes. There are a large number 12 of items that need to be completed at the plant, and 13 there are what I will call sort of the traditional 14 things on an operating plant. There are a number of 15 NUREG-737 issues. There are a number of responses to 16 ICE bulletins, follow-ups, or items that fall out of 17 health physics appraisals, out of routine inspections, 18 follow-ups to licensee event reports. There is a list 19 of things that have been accumulated for all time since 20 March 28. 21 In fact, these certification items are a 22 subset of that. So what we tried to concentrate on here t 23 is that subset, and the other items, you will see in a 24 moment, there is a quite lengthy list. But the key we 25 really focused on is items that had to be certified as l (_ ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON o.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345 ~.

9 1 complete prior to any decision concerning lifting the 2 suspension. You will get a feeling for the magnitude of 3 this in just a little while. There are some other / 4 items. 5 CHAIRMAN PALLADIN04 Darrell, I don't 6 understand the "NRC Review Complete-Not Complete." Is 7 it 65 out of 93. The 65 and 54 seem to add up to 119. 8 MR. JACOBS: No, it is 129. Sixty-five and 9 64. 10 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Is that 64, I as sorry. 11 MR. EISENHUTs Yes, it is. Of the 129, 65 12 have been signed off. 13 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Thank you. 14 ER. EISENHUT It is meant to be 64. In fact, 15 it is sort of an index, the var we follow progress in 16 this area. 17 If I,could go back to the previous slide. 18 (Slide.) 19 The second bullet here points to -- 20 I am sorry, back to the one entitled " Status 21 of Certification." There is one out of phase. 22 (Slide.) 23 Of the 64 that are not yet complete, four of 24 those items require power operation. They are items 25 that cannot be done prior to s decision. There are six k.- ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

10 1 items -- 2 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Wait, the 64 are NRC 3 reviews. 4 MR. EISENHUT Another way to put it. There 5 are four items in either the 36 and, therefore, in the s 6 64 by definition, that require power operation. There 7 are six that require hot functional testing, and two 8 others that ' require verification at the time of 9 restart. 10 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: I was noticing in the 11 MR. EISENHUTa Since they are all in the 36, 12 they are also in the 64 That is probably a better way 13 to say it. 14 Of the other remaining 52 -- That is taking 15 the six, the four, and the two away from the 64, of the 16 remaining 52, 19 are right now -- as of the time that we 17 put this together, they were ready for Region I 18 inspection, 22 require GPU action before the NBC could 19 get in the mode of doing an inspection. There were six 20 that were resting NRR, and there were five that are now 21 before ICE for 10 tion. 22 If I could go to two slides forward, to the 23 Schedule for Complete. 24 (Slide.) 25 The next question is, how are all these going i ALDERSoN REPORTING CCMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

9 11 1 to come together. This is a schedule both as the 2 utility has indicated this is how, and the schedule he 3 expects to resolve the 36 on. You can see that there 4 are a number of these that are going to be resolved -- 5 This schedule shows that by the end of January 1983 he 6 will have resolved all except those that are needed to 7 be done during hot functional testing. 8 The utility earlier today had indicated that 9 in fact the schedule for completion of those is right 10 now aiming more tovsrd the end of December, rather than 11 the end of January 1983. 12 COHNISSIONER AHEARNEs There are no items in 13 your list, other than the order and the Board ( 14 requirements. There are additional certification 15 things, are there not, that you are checking on? 16 MR. EISENHUT: That are not -- 17 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: That are not in those 18 two bins. 19 MR. EISENHUTa Not officially the 20 certification items, but there are items that we are 21 following up, yes. If I could, I will get to those a 22 little bit later, in just a moment. l l 23 There are a couple of other things that you l t 24 don't see from this. There are items that the utility 25 cannot complete until the NRC takes an action also. We k. ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY, INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

12 1 sort of have it in a catch-22, where we must approve his 2 technical specifications, for example, in a couple of 3 areas, which constitutes a couple of these items, before 4 he can modify his procedures, before the Region can sign 5 off and complete them. 6 We are trying to be pretty sensitive to those 7 and, again, today, I have asked the utility to identify 8 any of those where we are on the critical path, other 9 than the final sign-off. That is, we are prece' ding him 10 on any activity that he is doing. 11 00MMISSIONZR ROBERTSs You requested tha t 12 inf orma tion ? 13 MR. EISENHUTa Yes, I have. I have been 14 assured that it is only two or three items. It is a 15 very small amount. 16 The technical resolution, I believe, on all 17 issues has been arrived at, except for something on the 18 order of one or two issues. There are one or two issues 19 where we are still having some discussion with the 20 utility on the certification list. 21 Ihis sort of completes the overall picture of 22 where we believe the utility is and where we believe the l 23 staff is on the certification items. We are prepared to 24 talk in some more depth about any of the particular 25 items on the schedule, or aspects if you like. N l ALDERSCN REPORTING COMPANY,INC, l 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. O.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

13 1 There is, in fact, attached as background to 2 the package a listing of the certification items that 3 are remaining, and it breaks down specifically, item by 4 item, and the various status of where they stand. This 5 is a tracking system we keep, and as an item is 6 completed, we delete it from the list. 7 COMMISSIONER GILINSKYa What is the schedule 8 for steam generator repairs? 9 MR. EISENHUT The perfect question. 10 Could I have the next slide, please? 11 (Slide.) 12 This is a slide of -- And you r,eally, in front 13 of each bullet, you should think non-certification, 14 hecause I have deleted the certification items and put 15 them in the previous part of the package. 16 This is a listing of items and everything else 17 that is outstanding. You will notice that the steam 18 generator is the last item. It is the only item on the 19 critical path, and I will get to that in a little more 20 detail in a moment if I could. 21 The full menu of things that are left, you can 22 break down in a number of ways. This is one way we l 23 tried to break it down. i ( 24 First, on NUR EG-737, it is th e 25 non-certification remainder of that document. There are i l i i ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

14 1 a number of issues in 737 that have not yet been 2 resolved on this plant. I think resolution has been 3 reached on essentially all of those, consistent with the 4 position we are taking on the rest of the operating 5 reactors. 6 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Could 1 get you to 7 address one of them, and that is the one that you 8 highligh t -- 9 NR. EISENHUT: II.B.2.2 plant shielding. 10 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Yes. 11 H R '. EISENHUT: Yes. 12 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: You end up saying, "The 13 Staff has not completed its review of Licensee's 14 justification for operation." l 15 ER. EISENHUT: In fact, I.think there was a 16 schedule added for that SECT document that indicated l 17 that we hope to reach resolution on it by about October 18 8. 19 The item on plant shielding, we have not yet 20 resolved. It is an iten that Region I is actually 21 reviewing for us, and we have yet to reach resolution on 22 that issue. It now looks like the schedule is probably 23 a couple of weeks away. 24 2HAIRMAN PALLADINO: Is there anything that 25 you may want to add? (. At.DERSON REPORTING COMPANY, INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

15 O 1 HR. JARUSDICKIa There is not much to add, 2 other than the fact that we have started committing some 3 people to looking at that. They have been to the site i 4 and there is some more need to follow up on some 4 5 procedures. 6 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Is there something more 7 than the fact that rather than putting in shielding, 8 they decidad to go to having instrumentation that 9 enables them to operate the valves separately from the 10 region where the valves.are, and tha t instrumentation is 11 not available in time? 12 NR. JARUSDICKI Let me try to simplify it. 13 There appears to be a problem when you go to the 14 recirculation mode, and there are four diff erent ways 15 you can do it. 16 If you go through all those four different 17 ways, there are different areas that we have to have 18 access to that we may not have access to because of the l 19 source term. If you look and sa y, I need at least one 20 var of doing it, and not allow the other three ways, the 21 issue can be resolved today because they have shielding l 22 f or that mode of operation. 23 We, therefore, are saying, all right, how do 24 ve distinguish ? Do we want all four modes ready and 25 avsilable for restart, or will we be satisfied with one l l t l ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

16 1 mode of operation and will that be acceptable. So we 2 are working. We know that we have one path of 3 resolution and we will work out the details with them of 4 whether that is acceptable or not to NRR. So I see 5 closure. 6 Now, how long do we defer for allowing the 7 other three modes -- 8 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Is the acceptability, 9 then, a question of what is the probability that you 10 would need the other three modes? 11 MR. JARUSDICKIs I would have to say, yes, you 12 would have to look at that. As I said, that is 13 something that we need to discuss with NRR. 14 MR. EISENHUT The ball is in our court as of 15 about two days ago, and we just have not gotten to the 16 point of resolvin7 it yet. 17 MR. JACOBS: It relates to what we think are 18 procedural deficiencies in the procedures to go into 19 recirc. All we want to do is really verify that these 20 are in f act procedural deficiencies that can be 21 corrected before restart. 22 Ihat is really where we are, and it is recent 23 issue that came up, that was not known at the time the 24 SECY paper was written. 25 MR. EIS ENHUT 4 The rest of the 737 items, for k ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINTA AVE S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

17 / 1 example, things like reactor water level, we will be 2 handling, as I indicated, very similar to the rest of 3 the operating reactors, and we will be coming to the 7 4 Commission generically on those requirements. We,will 5 handle them in a like manner. 6 The next three bullets here on this chart 7 CHAIRMAN PAlLADINO: On these items, you note 8 in 384 that you are going to ask for approval to defer 9 these four items? 10 MR. JACOBS: Yes, sir, we recommended that for 11 f our of the items should be app roved for a delay until 12 March 31, 1983, or restart, whichever is earlier. 13 MR. EISENHUT: Remember, the Commission in 14 this case requested that the staff not take action on 15 THI-1 as we would on other operating reactors. We are 16 preparing the order on other operating reactors, where 17 we are working what we consider reasonable schedules for 18 those particular plants. We have been contacting 19 vendors of equipment to develop what reasonable i l 20 schedules are. l 21 In this case, following a similar fashion, we i 22 h a ve requested that the Commission approve deferral of l l 23 those items until Mar =h 31 or restart, whi: haver is i 24 later. It seems like a reasonable date, and it would i 25 seem like a very short period of time with th e overall l ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

18 1 schedule that is presently being proposed on this 2 plant. 3 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: If they start up before 4 March 31, would that require a shutdown to get some of 5 these done to meet the March 31 da te ? 8 MR. JACOBS: It is possible depending on how 7 far he got on the modification bef ore tha t time, yes, 8 sir. 9 MR. EISENHUT However, when you see the 10 overall schedule, it likely is not an impact. 11 The next three items on the slide, as I 12 indicated, really can be broken in a various number of 13 vars. It is really the overall listing of items that ( 14 are presently pending. I will call them the sort of the 15 classical items that are pending before the Region, and 18 Rich Jurasdicki is going to summarize those items. l 17 MR. JARUSDICKI: These items are what we 18 tra ditionall y see on any plant, just like we saw on 19 Susquehannah. We have appraisals. We have health 20 physics appraisals that were done, the emergency 21 planning appraisals. They are follow up items that need 22 to be closed out as a result of an inspection, ICE 23 bulletins. 24 Licensee make commitments to schedules, and 25 moct of these ICE bulletins were schedules for long ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

19 1 outage, like the. masonry wall problem. They have been 2 done, so we are closing them out. If an inspector has 3 to go back and check a certain item, he will put that on 4 this list. These types of items we have to have closed 5 prior to restart. 6 The outstanding inspection items relate to 7 appraisals and routine inspections. Outstanding LERs 8 require follow-up reports by licensees and the 9 inspectors, and the Region follows up on those. The ICE 10 f ollow-up, again, is commitments by the licensee that we 11 are following up, and again closing them out. 12 Hiscellaneous technical specifications, as 13 Darrell also mentioned earlier, general result in 14 changes in procedures that we then follow up to make 15 sure that they are properly implemented, and that the 16 people are trained to follow the new proced ures. 17 These are not something that is radically 18 different from any plant. I do see an abnormal number 19 of these items on IMI. It is pretty much what we had 20 experienced in Susquehannah. 21 MB. EISENHUTs The last ites item on the first 22 pa r t th e re, the number of miscellaneous technical 23 specification, there are a number of items that we need 24 to follow up. The sort of standard clean-up items in 25 the tech specs, really nothing significant in th a t k ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

20 1 group. 2 The last item on the slide is the only item 3 that is in a direct way on the critical path of the 4 licensee's estimate of plant readiness. 5 If I could have the last slide. 6 (Slide.) 7 COMMISSIONER AREARNE: You have reviewed and 8 approved the approach that has been used ? 9 HR. EISENHUT: We have, in fact, reviewed and 10 we have not yet issued the approval for the utility to 11 go forth with tha expansion process. That is, in fact, 12 d ue to be issued very shortly. The utility 's estimate, 13 as of today, his astinata for when he would begin the ( '14 repair operation, is about October 15th. He would not 15 be ready by then. Our evaluation will certainly be 16 issued by then. 17 Legitimately speaking, it is not an approval 18 of them to do the repair operation. The approval 10 actually comes prior to restart. We approve that they 20 have actually undergone a repair operation, and that 21 that operation will in fact accomplish its purpose. We 22 have done a limited review to ensure that this operation 23 has a reasonable likelihood of doing that. 24 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Clearly, if you had 25 found problems with the approach they are taking, you k. ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

21 /~ 1 would have -- 2 MR. EISENHUTa Absolutely. 3 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Do I gather your 4 conclusion is that you have not identified any 5 problems. 6 NR. EISENHUT: We have not identified any 7 problem. In fact, the explosive expansion process is 8 one that has been done on thousands of tubes. 9 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: It is what? 10 MR. EISENHUT It has been done on thousands 11 of tubes literally before, and we have high confidence 12 that it can be done. 13 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Successfully? 14 HR. EISENHUT: Successfully. 15 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: These are thousands of 16 tubes in how many plants? 17 3R. EISENHUT It is hard to say. A number of 18 those are not commercial power plants. So it is over a 19 number of f acilities. There have also been -- 20 CHAIRMAN PALLADIN04 Nuclear facilities? 21 ER. EISENHUT Some are nuclear f acilities, 22 some are not. 23 MR. JACOBS: I might add that Combustion 24 Engineering uses this process in all their initia tion 25 fabrication, an explosive expansion process, to close k ALDERSON REPCRTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

22 O 1 the gaps between the tubes and the tube-sheets. 2 ER. EISENHUT: It is a variation of it. 3 COMMISSIONER ROBERTS: It works in 4 manufacturing. 5 HR. JACOBS Not in repair. 6 HR. EISENHUT: It is a variation of that 7 process, but it is very similar. 8 There also has been some extensive tests that 9 have been run to demonstrate that this process in fact 10 ran work. 11 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: In steam generators? 12 HR. EISENHUTa In steam generators, yes. 13 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: With effect now?' In 14 position? 15 HR. EISENHUT Yes. 16 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: You said that you had 17 made a preliminary, it sounded like a tentative 18 analysis. 19 HR. EISENHUTa No, it is not meant to be. It 20 is meant to be the subtlety that we go through, sort of 21 the legalisms. It is not an approval, but it is a 22 r ev iew. We have done a review in enough depth into the l 23 process to see that the process can be done. As the 24 Commissioner indicated, we have done enough of a review 25 to say, stop, if in fact we thought there was any ( ALCERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE, S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

23 T' 1 question about the process. 2 Technically, it is not the approval because 3 the approval actually entails that it can work and it 4 has done so properly. So the approval vill come prior 5 to a restart decision, and that is the only 6 tentativeness. 7 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: But you are satisfied. 8 You have gone in enough depth to know whether there are 9 problems to be faced. 10 MR. EISENHUT: Yes, we have, and that 11 evaluation will be issued very shortly. 12 The utility would start the repair operation 13 on October 15. He would be completing the repairs 14 something toward the end of the year. As you can see, 15 his proposed schedule would end up with a completion 16 date in February, which is the end of the process, since 17 this is in fact on the critical path. 18 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Do you think that that 19 is realistic? 20 HR. EISENHUT Our estimate at the bottom is 21 that we are shooting more -- W*e think that it is will be 22 closer to a March / April timeframe. 23 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: You say, "Staf f 's 24 optimistic estimate of schedule." 25 3R. EISENHUT: Yss. We don't think it can u ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

2 f4 1 really be -- 2 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Let me back up and say, 3 what do you think is your realistic estimate? ( 4 MR. EISENHUT I don't know whether there is 5 any -- We think this is the earliest it can be. If they 6 run into difficulties, it would be later, depending upon 7 those difficulties. It is really hard to speculate 8 beyond that. 9 We really think that this is the earliest 10 timeframe that this can all be accomplished, and that is 11 why the March 1983 date f or completion of the other 12 items. I believe, from a practical standpoint, ther 13 vill essentially coincide. 14 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Optimism in schedules 15 around usually means that it run out by many months. 16 MR. EISENHUIs Having had the opportunity to 17 reflect on this slide, I would have deleted that word. 18 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: But it still vould have 19 been an optimistic estimate, though, would it not? 20 MR. EISENHUT No. Characterized, I think the 21 Staff believes it is about as early as it can be 22 accomplished. 23 MR. JACOBS: I think for the mode tha t he 24 would go through to complete his repairs and to get 25 ready for operation, the schedule is realistic, but it ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

25 1 doesn 't include contingencies if he runs in to 'a major 2 problem. That is the reason that it is stated as being 3 optimistic. ( 4 MR. EISENHUTs As I said, I would have deleted 5 the word from the slide, had I had time to read the 6 slide. 7 That basically concludes our presentation. We 8 are prepared to address any of the items in some more 9 detail as concerns"the schedule or aspects. 10 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE. Let me just ask about 11 another item on that steam generator. Do you have in 12 mind any specific requirements on its operation and 13 subsequent verification? 14 Have you reached a conclusion on the 15 procedures that you will require, or is tha t something 16 they propose and you accept it? 17 HR. EISENHUTa I don't think tha t we are at 18 tha t point yet. I think that is really where we are. 19 There would very likely be some additional -- 20 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Where vill the approval 21 be with th s t ? Will tha t be in the Region? 22 MR. EISENHUTs It will be in headquarters. 23 The approval for restart af ter the repair vill be based 24 upon several pieces of information, including 25 inf ormation f rom the Region, information from the Y ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

26 1 utility, based on inspections. We will put it all 2 together, and I would expect that we will come up with 3 some special requirements. I 4 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: I am just trying to 5 make sure that I can get a sense of it. Do you expect 6 the utility will proposes here is how we intend to 7 verify that this repair process was satisfactory. 8 ER. JACOBS: Yes. 9 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: There will be a set of 10 tests which NRR would then agree, yes, those are 11 adequate tests? 12 ER.,JACOBS: Before you get to hot functional 13 testing, there is a series of tests you have to do, 14 which involve the hydro, probably some probalistic gas 15 leak tests to verify the leak tigh tness. 16 What we are really concerned about is what 17 happens when it is repaired -- We are not really 18 concerned, but what we all want to know is what happens 19 to the repair in an operating condition, and hot 20 functional testing is as close as you can get to 21 simulated operating condition and doing it in a safe 22 manner. If problems are going to show up, we would 23 expect them to show up in that time. 24 With regard to specific tests, it would be in 25 terms of monitoring leak rates and those kinds of ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

27 1 things. We wouldn't be proposing to put th e plant 2 through any type of major transients to do it, though. 3 COEMISSIONER AHEARNE: Have you thought 4 through whether you would require a longer period during 5 hot functional testing? 6 HR. JACOBS: Yes, we have. We have been 7 working very closely with the Licensee. He has been 8 incorporating some of our concerns, and as part of that, 9 I think, he is proposing right now about a 30-day hot 10 functional testing. 11 Then, even following a restart condition, we 12 would probably expect only short periods of operation, 13 and then come back down and verify with anti-current 14 t es ting, that kini of thing. He is generally in 15 a greement with that type of strategy. 16 HR. EISENHUT We have not reached the bottom 17 line of what those things will look like. 18 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: As GPU proposed and you 19 reviewed the program for assuring the quality assurance 20 in this repair process? 21 MR. JACOBS: Yes, sir. Part of their 22 evaluation was to demonstrate how th ey were proposing 23 quality controls and procedures for doing the 24 expansion. 25 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Do you approve their QA \\- i ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

28 e 1 program? 2 MR. JARUSDICKI The specific QA program, no, 3 sir. (~ 4 MR. EISENHUTa The overall approval process 5 has not -- I mean, we have not reached the point yet. 6 It is in the very near future. In fact, we are still 7 putting together the final evaluation. 8 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: Don't you approve the QA 9 program? 10 MR. EISENHUIs It is not really a QA program 11 per se for this, but it ist How do you kno w there is a 12 quality job being done on the generator. 13 CHAIRMAN PALLADIN0s I don't mean only 14 con firming that it has been done, but how do they assure 15 that it is being done properly, making sure that he has 16 the proper QA? 17 MR. JACOBSa During the time that he is doing 18 the expansion, we are going to have people on site 19 monitoring the process. We also have one of our 20 contractors reviewing the procedures he is using to 21 conduct the expansions. Also, as we said, any problems 22 tha t should show up, are going to show up in a leak 23 testing mode or a hot functional testing mode. 24 I might add that he is not just running off 25 and doing this in his steam generator. He has been f(, ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY. INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

29 1 doing extensive testing on a steam generator at Mount 2 Vernon, Indiana, which is a full steam generator. It is 3 a TMI-1 type steam generator. He has been conducting 4 similar procedures to consider ALARA concepts, and a 5 number of other concerns, following the exact procedures 6 he would use in his steam generator. 7 0HAIRMAN PALLADINO: Are there any inspection 8 methods that are used as a certain number of tubes are 9 done, to make sure that the bond is effective? 10 HR. JACOBS: In the early part of it, he 11 intends to do a test on tubes in the generator, and to 12 conduct the expansions, and then verify with 13 profilometry and sati-current testing, and all kind of 14 testing. 15 He is incorporating in the process quality 16 checks, where he would stop at various periods and look 17 a t whether he is doing the repairs the way he should 18 b e. 19 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY The Chairman 's 20 previous question, it seems to me, is an interesting 21 one, not only for the case of THI but all reactors. Did 22 we, anywhere along the way, specifically address the 23 question of the Licensee's QA program, and convince 24 ourselves or decide th a t we were satisfied? 25 MR. EISENHUTs For steam generator ALDERSoN REPORTING COMPANY,INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

30 1 activities? 2 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY For steam generator 3 activities, or more generally for the general ( 4 refurbishing of the plant? 'S HR. JACOBS: Yes, sir. 6 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY: Who did that? 7 NR. JACOBS: The quality assurance plan was 8 submitted to NRR for review. It was a subject in the 9 hearing. The implementation of the quality assurance 10 plan is being reviewed by Region I by. inspection. 11 ER. EISENHUT For all plants, there are in 12 f act detailad quality ass'urance plans. 13 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY: I know that we review 14 these plans, paper plans, but to what extent have we 15 made a determination that we have a functioning QA 16 organization that is adequate to the job. This applies 17 not only to THI, but -- 18 HR. JARUSDICKI THI is not being treated 19 dif ferently. They still have QC inspectors. They have 20 QC organiza tion. They still have to do their 21 double-checking. There is the papertrail they have to l l 22 follow, but they also still have to have their l l 23 requirements for their own people to follow their own l l 24 procedures. 25 So I woul think that quality is both the QC ( ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

31 '] 1 people coming along and looking at the quality of work 2 being done, and do you judge the quality of the work beidg done is by what kind of effort has gone into 3 4 preparing the procedures to do the job properly. ? 5 COBEISSIONER GILINSKYs It doesn't sound to me 6 like anywhere along the way va have ssids Yes, the 7 quality assurance program is functioning as it should. 8 But rather the opposite, that a number of problems 9 accumulate 10 NR. JACOBS: There has been a quality ~ 11 assurance inspection on TRI-1 to verify that the proper 12 implemer 1 was kosher. There may be some 13 outstanding items, but I am not sure if Region I can 14 address those. 15 There has been a specific quality assurance 16 inspection o,n THI-1. 17 NR. JARC DICkIs We have had inspectors from n 18 Region 1' whose sole-job is looking at quality assurance 19 progra.7s. They have been to TMI-1 throughout the course 20 o f the year. So that should answer your question. 21 However, I would like,to go a step further and say that s. 22 that is not where quality stops with us. 23 We still go beyond the program and what those 24 inspectors look at. I have not seen an enforcement 25 history or a problem with the quality of the work or the (. ~ ' 'l ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC. 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W WASHINGTCN. C C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

f A 32 e 1 1 quality control program. 2 So froa a programmatic standpoint, we have s 3 people looking at it. From looking at what the 4 inspectors a re finding, I see no problems. So I have to 5,say, yes, there has been a program. NRR has looked at e it. It has been applied in the field, and we are 7 satisfied with it. 8 COMMISSIONER GILINSKY Because they have not 9 turned up problems to a degree where it would cause you 10 cobcern. r, ' 11 MR. EISENHUTs That is implicitly what it is. 12 In f act, generally what surfaces, so to speak, at either

13. o pe ra ting reactor or at OLs is where problems elevate 14 themselves and surface that here is a demonstration of a 15 history with some problems.

Generally that is where we 16 really start refocusing on it, certainly in 17 headquarters. 18 That, basically, completed the items that we 19 vere planning to summarize. This is the kind of ( 20 schedule we are looking at. We have committed that we 21 are putting on whatever resources it takes to continue 22 to process the approval of the remaining 64 items. We 23 don 't really think, even though the number is getting 24 pretty intense -- 25 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: I assume that you mean s., ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554-2345

33 1 by, to continue your process, reviews of the remaining 2 64 items before they get approval. 3 MR. EISENHUT: Requests for approvals, yes. 4 In f act, some have run into difficulty, and some are 5 continuing to. 6 We will continue to process those, thouch. The 7 density of them, so to speak, is getting greater per 8 month as we get closer to the r;d of the line. 9 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO Darrell, you earlier 10 referred to your indication that you wanted our approval 11 to defer four items. Then I wonder what part do we 12 Commissioners play, if any, in approval of the 129, if I 13 can remember the number. 14 COMMISSIONER AHEARNEa Go ahead, Darrell. 15 MR. EISENHUT: What I wanted to say earlier to is, the reason the SECY document came down requesting -- 17 and it was written as proposing -- was because it was 18 our understanding that was the mode the Commission 19 wanted to be in. That is, you wanted us to put it in a 20 recommended mode on this plant, so you could take the 21 final action. 22 Concerning the certification items, we are 23 required to certify to the Commission the completion of 24 129 items. Then you would include that in your overall 25 decision. That is basically why the language here is a ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTCN. D.C'. 20024 (202) 554 2345

34 1 little different than it normally would be. 2 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: The reason I raise the 3 question, it seems to me you have asked for specific 4 approval for the deferral of these four items. 5 COMMISSIONER AHEARNE: Those are the 737 6 items. They are outside. 7 CHAIBNAN PALLADIN0s Are there any other 8 questions from the Commissioners? 9 (No response.) 10 CHAIRMAN PALLADINO: I gather that this 11 completes the status report. We will agraa on deferral 12 on the items affecting THI-1 restart. Thank you all. 13 (Whereupon, at 3: 40 p.m., the mee ting L. 14 adjournci,/ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY,INC, 400 VIRGINIA AVE., S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024 (202) 554 2345

O m NUCLEAR REGUIATORT COMMISSICN This is to certify that the attached ;rceeedings before the COMMISSION MEETING i in the matter of: Status of Staff Certification on Licensee Compliance with Restart Recuirement on TMI-l Date of' Freceeding: october 6, 1982' DocketAlumber: Flace of Proceed.ing: WASHINGTON, D. C. were held as hereia appears, and that this is the original transcript thereof for the fila of the Cecmission Patricia A. Minson Official Reporter (Typed) W: d' 7bNsu l Official Reporter (Signa:ure) 1 1 1 l l l l / l d l l

COMMISSION BRIEFING OCTOB'EP. 6,1982 TMI-1 STATUS O O e D. G. EISENHUT 49-27572 l l l D l

j 1 s j ij OUTLINE i . e; i e CERTIFICATION PLAN .c ~ e STATUS OF CERTIFICATION [ e

SUMMARY

- CERTIFICATION ITEMS a

SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION e OTHER 1TEFS TO BE COMPLETED BEFORE RESTART i e OVERALL PLANT STATUS AND SCHEDULE e ATTAtllMENT -{ - CERTIFICATION ITEMS REMAINING ..'*j C }

(iil i:),

4 A O e S l I .i, i I 1 l ^

CERTIFICATION PLAN CERTIFICATION LIMITED TO SHORT TER4 REQUIPSBffS AS IDB?flFIED s ~ IN AUGUST 9,1979 AND MARG 8,1980 ORDERS AND BOARD IMPOSED SHORT TERM RE0JIREFEiTS e CERTIFICATI04 PREREQJISITES - LICBiSEE MJST HAVE FULLY CGRETED ' - REGION I, IE, OR NRR WILL INSPECT OR VERIFY CURETION WITH ALL OUTSTNSING ISSUES RESOLVED 6 E B

STATUS 0F CERTIFICATION e OF 129 CERTIFICATION ITEMS, 65 TOTALLY COMPLETE AS OF 9/23/82 e 0F 64 ITEMS NOT YET COMPLETE, 4 REQUIRE POWEP OPERATION, 6 PEQUIRE HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTING 01FT) AND 2 OTHERS PEQUIRE VERIFICATION AT TIE OF RESTART e OF 52 REMAINING ITEMS - 19 ARE READY FOR REGION I INSPECTION - 22 REQUIRE GPU ACTION WITH SUR70Rif IflSPECTION/ REVIEW BY REGION I/NRR OR IE - 6 REQUIRE NRR ACTION WITH POSSIBLE' FOLLOWUP ACTION BY GPU AND REGION I - 5 REQUIRE IE VERIFICATION e ALL CERTIFICATION ITEMS EXCEPT THOSE REQUIRING CHANGE IN PLANT CONDITIONS COULD BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY 1983

S!Ji%RY CERTIFICATION ITBE I. AUGUST 9, 1979 ORDER

1. OF UTILITY fEC REVIEW SHORTIERMITEMS

_ ITEMS LU9tBE IbT COMPLETE _l0 9LETE' NOT COMoLETE

1. ER! RELIABILITY 19 13 6

12 7 2.IEBULLETINS 24 20 4 19 5

3. EMERGBlCY PREPAP m 4ESS 1

1 0 1 0 4.SEPARATIONOFIMI-1/2 7 7 0 1 6

5. WASTE i b e eft 2

1 1 1 1'

6. i h ERIAL CAPABILIT/

J2 30 2 9 3 7.FINANCIALQUALIFICATIONS N/A

8. CATEGORY"A"LESSONSLEARNED 21 15 6

10 11

11. ASLB IMo0 SED REQUIREMENTS s

(SHORTIERM) A. iGiT PID 10 6 4 4 6 B. PLAffT DESIGN PID 21 14 7 7 14 C. EMERGENCY PLANNING PID. 8 6 2 1 7 D.CHEATINGPID 4 0 4 0 4 TOTALS -129 i ~93 , 35 65 54 l 9

O .SCEDULE FOR CU4PLETION OF CERTIFICATION OF 64 RB%INING CERTIFICATION ITEMS: UTILITY NRC OCTOBER 1982, 7 '.12 lbveeER 1982 14 15 2 19 DEC9eER1982 JANUARY 1983 2 6 FFT 6 6 RESTART /POWERESCALATIONIESTING 5 6 E R 4 0 a 6 l l e O 4 [ A

T '.) E L1;~6 OTHER ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO RESTART S;G .; + v ((ik e NUREG-0737 (SEE S'ECY-82-3810 lek e GUTSTANDING IE INSPECTION ITEMS '9;5 e RES0 LOTION OF OUTSTANDING LERs i e IE BULLETIN FOLLOWUP e MISCELLANE0US TECllNICAL SPECIFICATIONS q.y $. jk,). ONLY ITEM ON CRITICAL PATH . g gl e STEAM GENERATOR REPAIRS f.d. .s . * ^$ 9 l l b l l i ( i 1 i i j t i l \\ l t 1

OSALL PlRif STATUS /SOEDULE e OTSG REPAIRS CONTROLLING PLANT RESTART READINESS e STEAM GENERATOR RECOVERY SCHEDULE - START OF EXPLOSIVE EXPANSION REPAIRS 10/82 - CO WLETION OF REPAIRS /0TSG CLEANUP / LEAK IESTING .12/82 - PuwT AVAILABLE FOR POST REPAIR / PRECRITICAL IESTING .12/82 -REMAININGACTIONS e RCS CLEANUP I.E, DESULFURIZATION (MAJOR POTENTIAL SCHEDULE IMPACT) e bT OPERATIONS AND Sw SEQUENT ECT TO VERIFY 1/83 (EST.) -hPAIR ACCEPTABILITY e POTENTIAL FuRTmR REPAIR eOPTIMISTICCmPLETIONDATE 2/83 e STAFF OPTIMISTIC ESTIMATE OF SCHEDtA.E eHOTOPERATIONS 1/83 l l e PLANT READY FOR CRITICALITY tWAPRIL 198 O l l l -9

8 9 k e a m 9 9 e O M e N = CERTIFICATION ITEMS PE1AINING 4 8 9 d

• G e

e e G 4 6

... L.... ...w=ww;T < i-1:. ,r . ?ve ? n...~. w. a: O gggTf:gTIgg ITBIS RB1/\\lilliG INSPECTION / REVIEW ESTIMATED COPLETION/ Ini DESCRIPTIQ1 ITEMIYPE llCENSEE STATUS STATUS IMARKS .. SIET TElt) RDER ITEM 1 BlRELIABILITY A-1 AtRo INITIATION OF EFW 110D COMPLETE C0 FETE E)(CEPT POWER ESCALATION TESTitG A-3 Auto EFW LOAD m DIESELS Il0D. COMPLETEEXCEPT PARTIALLYC0fLETE IESTitG DURitG IfI TESTIfG A1 EFWTECHSPECS IEOiSPECS PROCEDURE PARTIALLY 12/82 J DRAFTED COMPLETE A-8 BlAuToSTARTANNUNCIATlal ll0D C0fLETE COMPETE EXCEPT POViER ESCALATION TESTitG A ADDITIONAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS CWST LEVEL ALARM ll0D I ALLY COMPETE 12/82 6-EFW INITIATION MOD MWORKINPROGRESS PARTIAU.Y COPLETE.ll/82 EXCEPT IFT INDEPENDENTOFAC sT.10/82 8 CROSS-IIEBREAK ANALYSIS COMPLETE ik)N-DESTRUCTIVE 12/82' EXAM RECORI)Q REVIEW SOiEDULED.1z/82, i BDER ITEM 2 IE BlueTINS 9-05A-2 PLANT IRANS!EtR REVIEW INSPECTION CmPETE SOIEDULED12/82 12/82 945A-5 VALVE PoSITia REVIEW PROCEDURES VALVE LINEUP VERIFICATION AT Tim 0F RESTART 3-05A-6 CONTAltliENT ISOLATION il0D RDER' ITEM 8 DER ITEM 8 3-05B-5 AtRICIPAIORY EACTM IRIP Il0D COMPLETE COMPETE EXCEPT POWER ESCALATION (SAFETY bRADE TESTING -.

iti lhSCRIPTION ITEMTYPE LICENSEESTATUS hfm EsTIMgA im/ ' R v1 f.R_lTai_4 SEPARATim 0F lHI-1 & 2 A)lQUIDRADWASTE ..NTERCONIECTION ISOLATION IbD COMPLETE SCHEDULED 10/E2 10/82 B)6ASEOUS ADHASTE R IEST COMPLETE SCHEDULED _;.0/82 ,.0/82 +MAK IEST OF lhSTE SYSTEM UEL llANDL1tE 1301LDIt0 IbD CWPLETE SCHEDULEDLO/82 .O/82 IS0t> Tim UEL-llANDLitE 801lpIFE IhD COMPLETE SCHEDULED 10/82 10/82 lENTILATim SYS. Il0D. dl SYi SEGREGATION PROCEDURES COMPLETE SCHEDULED 10/82 10/f2 D)SNiPLING SYS - NDEPENDENT l-2 SAMPLIIE Il0D COMPETE SCHEDULED 10/82 10/82 YSTEM DER ITEM 5 WASTEIMAGEMENT B) SOLID RADWASTE -ldW ACTIVITY STm. IhD COMPLETE SCHEDULED 10/82 10/82 EXPANSION ' DER ITEM 6 IbAGERIALCAPABILilY l C)llEALTH hiYSICS -OuALIFICATim RECMDS IRAINING COMPLETE PARTIALLYCOMPLETE 11/82 D)f0 REG-0694 ITEMS ( -II.B 4 IRAINING REC 01DS

IRAINItE 2ARTIA COMPLETE PARTIALLY COMPLETE 1/83 FORIIITIGATli0 CORE 3AMAGE 3T.

E)liSPECTORSVIEWS S FINDINGS INSPECTION I LL COMPETE PARTIALLY COMPLETE.12/82 i

.d ~ ( g 1 BH c, 3 _s., w Tid 3 9" @H. h g -4 d-d ..c ... a _ :U.9 gg b ~m = i:. R 6 d2

• W*

j$ mN IN8 .? 9 8 Q -Q @8, a@l 2 3.Q W3 b MW ~9 p a 2 3_ a ma a ? a s s B. " mmQ yy B 4m b b e g2 Wm b ]Eu u u = sa* d-d- d-d- N d, ~ mb:- s 5 W@ s c. s s s s w gr s b h h. f:.1 R$" ,p Y$~ - y.2j

5 P

4 innN ..r y ggi a m m .i.h, I N N

a. Net

= N %_%_t 9s9 Q =2 s S S8 m as m S S $88 3 8 56 3 =& 4 w Z h .B_ B D ' &_ 3 - B &_ E _5_ m i 8t t m m '-d 'j H

p. Ep

>d m 6 g 5 E S E g^ G_g E i -g t2 wE p 5 9 pg =g

• $s ~

?E - 5 m 5 p 9 588 -is sl 3l JE=b E9p @ g@M. 8 6^ W i ~ s s i was= m a a m i s me p m ti y $85 ace E ~# 3 d3la~j~5 5 B 6 i p s ~l gg mM a e = et s_ m e a u 2.e dg d.p% s rA Ra wu R&e = 4 i 5 h M O f% CO ~ @ b e-4 i -i -i -i -i -i idd

ll. ASLB IMPOSED Re0u!REMENTS T INSPEGTION/ REVIEWESTIMATED COPPLETION/ b) NSCRIPTION LICENSEESTATUS STATUS REMARKS g

1. MANAGBET FIl0lliGS - AUGUST 27,1981 PID I

C0fPLETE PARTIALLY COMPLETE d2/E II.D. ACCWACYOFMAINTENANCERECORDS 3 II.M

5. BIDS AND 8PECS Fm 1NI-1 10/82 STATUS REPORT PENDING ll/02 PREPARE BIDS /lSSUE SPECSc REPLICATE SIMULATm PREPAREBIDS/lSSUE 10/&-FIRSTOFLICENSEEANNUAL SPECS.

REPORTS ON PROGRESS-EsT. J2/&

6..(OgrRACT Fm BASIC PRINCIPLQ@

NSTALED-1983 PENDING 12/2 IRAINER TO BE INSTALLED IN E CT COMPLETE PARTIALLJ PENDING 1/83

7. DIRECTm IRAININGEMERGENCY DIRECTm/SuePmT EST. 12 m, COMPLETE

9. SHIFT IlANNING(A)-(G). LICENSEE CONDITIONS FOR COMPLETE SCHEDULED AT AT TIME OF RESTART, LICENSE RESTART CONDITION

10. (3A)-(C).SPECIFICJUNCJIONS MANAGEMEJr SYSTEM TO COMPLETE PARTIALLY COMPLETE 11/82 ERFmM hLATED TO OPERATING LXPERIENCE INFORMATION B.

PLM DESIGlt MODIFICATI0ll N0 PROCEDURES Fli0lilGS - DECB1BER 1LI,1981 PID ]I.C STAFF '.gW REVISED AT0G PROGRAM ERIC PROGRN4 UNDERNRRREVIEW CERTIFY REASON @ (PARA. 1 ITTED PROGRESS ST.tu 31.E PRESSURIZERHEATERS 11/82SUQMITTAL PENDING 12/82 DFmNSEATE RCS PRESSURE CONTROL TO REG. I wAlPI (PARA. 755) QI.K pERATOR%IANCEONCOMPUTER ER COMPLETE PENDING 10/82 i (PARA. 86]) -INCORE ItjERM0 COUPLE BACKUP (PARA. 867) COPPLETE EXCEPT PENDING l" CENSE CONDITION BEFORE DISPLAY (NOT SAFET( GRADE) TESTING 5%PWER-lFT O

~ .......: ~.i -..L.L.L. L........... ....u 6n mal. :&.,.. " " mih.n.c. :.. L..

a..

Im DESCRIPTION llCENSEESTATUS STATUS ' ESTIMATED COPPLETION/ INSPECTION / REVIEW REMARKS l.M SAFETY SYSTEM S ATUS PANEL T -SYSTEM STATUS NNIN. CONTROLS CthPLETE PARTIALLYCOMPLETE 11/82 (PARA. M ) WEG 2 DEFICIENCIES IM. ITEMS-30/E ALLY COMPLETE Sl10RT-TEIN 10 ,LT (PARA. 914-915) DEFICIENCIES T REFUEL ^ AFTER RESTART LICENSE CONDITION) 1.0 iTimA IgAAtMLYSIS - NSTAll. LAVITATING VENTURIS - COPPLETEEXCEPT C0fPLETEEXCEPT II' PARA. 9 ) TEST TEST ~ I.P SYSTEMSC' SIFICATIO1 ' UPGRADE SSURIZER_EYJE INST. COPPLETE SCHEDULED 12/E 12/E POWER SUPPLIES (PARA.'Luul) I.0 ERlRELIABILITY A)B'WCAVITATINGVENTURIS CmPLETEEXCEPT COPPLETE EXCEPT lFT TESTING TESTING -PROPOSE MEANS TO PREVENT @ l ISOLATION ' COMPLETE I6 REVIEW RTI REASONABLE PROGRESS = DUE TO RUPTURE DETECTION SYSTEM FAILURE < PENDING T. (PARA.100 Stim REG-0694 ~ !I.S 00ARDpPARA. l ITEMS -l'.G.1-Lw PNER IESTING PARTIAU.Y COMPURE 'IdREVIEW PENDING DURINGLO4POWERTESTING ( ON ANCFRNING SW MITTED RESPONSE UNDER E REVIEW J/82; LICENSE CONDITION FOR ING.P,68)llER E0 ITEMS Oi r ATERI 2_ ITEMS PRIOR TO EXCEEDING (PARA. &.Ll 5% POWER F REVIEW FLOOD COMPLETE DERREVIEWPENDING 11/82 ULAT10NS PARA. )

\\ M bSCRIPTION LICENSEESTATUS TUS

. SEPARATION OF VII-1 AND Tf1I-2 FIIDIfES-DECB1BER 14,1981 (II.B

-VENTIl f 1 W) SEPARATION PROGRNi IEST COWLgg$ IRRREVIEWPENDING 312/ @ (PARA. 2b/ StR41TTAL.LU/ ). BEGFi[Y PtMNIlE FIf0Il0S V.L CWCLljsI0ltS PARAGRAPH 2010 ne!- fl0NS A.BiERGENCY SU?%T DIRECTOR COWLETE PENDING 11/@ STAFFING IN dF PRIOR TO FULL 2b1IA ARR V P ~ B. STAFF EVJ34 COUNTY EP BROCHURES COWLETE 'B M REVIEW COMPLETE 11/82 AND t PAMPHLET AND ADVISE 'EC AINISE COMilSSION C0ftllSSION OF IMPACT OF CHANGES C.PB M PA W HLET AND COUNTY BR0pi E COMPLETE PENDING 11/@ DISTRIBUTION TO POPULACE IN t D.PLELIC' INFORMATION BROCHURE DISTRIBLITION EST 11/82 PENDING 12/82 TO TRANSIENT LOCATIONS E. LICENSEE TO CONDUCT EP BRIEFINGS SCHEDUUED11/82 PENDING 12/82 TO MAJOR EMPLOYERS AND OPERATORS 0F TRANSIENT LOCATIONS. 3RIEFINGS l TO BEGIN PRIOR TO RESTART F. STAFF CERTIFY SATISFACTORY COMPLETION COMPLETE fB h REVIEW COW LETE 11/@ OF SIREN SYSTEM TESTING STAFF REVIEW 11/82 H. CERTIFY TO COMMISSION THAT B)Z IVA FBM R IEW C0fFLETE 32/82 SCHOOL PLANS ARE CO W LETE ArNISE ISSION 12182 RE0PB0ED PROCEEDING ON CllEATIf0-JULY 27,1982 ' f. PARAGRAPH 2421

2) LICENSEE ESTABLIS(RAINING INSTRUCTORS CRITERIA FOR

~ EST 11/82 PENDING 1/83 QUALIFICATIONSOFI

INSPE' TION / REVIEW ESTIMATED COMPLETION /. [H1 DESCRIPTION LICENSEESTATUS bTATuS REMRKS 3)LICENSEEIMPLff1ENTINTERilAt.AuDITitG EST.11/82 PENDING 12/82 MOCEDURE Off IRAINitG NID lESTifG h0QRNi TO BE COMPLETED BY Ih GER 0F IRAINitG AND SUPERVISOR OF IRAINING ll)LICEllSEE ItPLEMEfq A PR E EST.11/82 pef 0 LNG 1/83 FOR SAMPLitlG NJD l(EVIEW OF 1 OflSWERS TO DETECT LilEATIfG. 181 Ih0 CESS To BE APPROVED BY IIRC 5)UtlTILFUREERORDER,G. LLLER'S 10/82 PENDitG 11/ 8 2 PARTICIPATION IN ESTING/ OPERATKti 0F IIII.STARTUP 1 TO BE UPERVISED BY 6IUL OFFICIAL e 4 4 4 4 \\ i i I G e g}}