ML20027C532

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards List of Important Differences in Unit 1 & 2 Design Features,In Support of Review of Proposed OL for Unit 2
ML20027C532
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire
Issue date: 10/11/1982
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Adensam E, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8210180128
Download: ML20027C532 (2)


Text

a DUKE POWER Goniwxy I'.O. ISOX 33180 CIIAllLOTTE. N.C. 28242 II AL II. TUCKEH TFLEPHOW

, u, n.

.,m (704) a73-4Siti ef tL F.am PeoptTTIon October 11, 1982 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Attuntion:

Ms. E. G. Adensam, Chief Licensirig Branch No. 4

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit 2 Docket No. 50-370

Dear Mr. Denten:

In order to support your review for the proposed facility operating license for McGuire Unit 2, the important differences in design features between McGuire Units 1 and 2 are identified on the attached page. Please contact R. E. Harris (704-373-8771) if you have any questions.

Very truly yours, Hal B. Tucker REH:jfw Attachment cc: James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator P. R. Bemis U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Resident Inspector Region II McGuire Nuclear Station 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 O D 8210180128 821011 PDR ALOCK 05000370 A

PDR

McGuire Unit 1 - Unit 2 Significant Differences 1.

B C control rods on Unit 2 (Re: FSAR Section 4).

4 2.

No Boron Injection Tank (BIT) for Unit 2.

3.

Offsite power distribution voltages.

(Re: FSAR Section 8.1) 4 Live thermocouples in upper reactor head not installed on Unit 2.

5.

Steam Generator preheater instrumentation not installed on Unit 2.

(Re: FSAR Table 14.1.4-3) 6.

Tests not required for Unit 2 such as UllI high-pressure blowdown test, steam generator water hammer test, and special low power tests (natural circulation verification, etc.)

.