ML20027B247

Addendum to 820824 Cost/Benefit Contention on Dewatering Costs

ML20027B247
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	09/13/1982
From:	Stamiris B STAMIRIS, B.
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8209160579
Download: ML20027B247 (1)

Text

. _ _ _ _

l 0 00CKETED USNHC U.S. Nuc lea r P.e gulatory Cormiss ion M SEP 15 40:50 In f.he Matter af Docl<e t Nuckers 5 6 ECRt'TARr CFC.. i.idi M 'Irat.

' 5J~ -U{0,0j yg OE D. i L 3  !. 7.

.9EFORE THE ATOMIC SJ.PETY 6 LICEH51NO EDARD 9/10/02 STM11PIS ADDENDUM TO 8/24/02 COST / BENEFIT CGITENTIGJ:

DEWATERING COSTS The cost / benefit balance to the public of operating the Midland plant cannot be valid without taking account of the projected operation and maintenance costs of the permanent dewatering system.

There is no mention of dewatering cost considerations in the DES or FES analyses. The anticipated deterioration, poss-ible repair and or replacement 6f wells must be projected in addition to routine operating expenses. This unicue aspect of Midland's operation is a significant factor in the cost / benefit analysis which warrants consideration and explanation. (If already included in operating expenses,itbeso dewatering costs should be delineated.)

Respectfully submitted, cc: ASLB members Barbara Stamiris W. Paton, NRC M. Mi,1Isr, CPC ~

'. . 5795' N. River Freeland, Mich. 48623 Secretary, NRC . . .

• "' I 2 # * "-

82091605798209th) '

(

gDRADOCK 05000329 PDR

_ - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ 3