ML20027A179
| ML20027A179 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 09/28/1978 |
| From: | Fleischaker D, Kristovich S, Phillips J CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, FLEISCHAKER, D.S. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20027A174 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7810190269 | |
| Download: ML20027A179 (32) | |
Text
, '
UNITED STATES ~OF~ AMERICA j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before The Atomic Safety & Licensing-Board
~
~
In The Matter Of
)
)
PACIFIC GAS ~& ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
Docket Nos.-50-275-iOL 1
50-323 OL (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,)
Units 1 & 2)
)
i f
INTERVENORS' REPLY TO THE STAFF AND APPLICANT RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' MOTION REQUESTING THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSING BOARD SUBPOENAS-t The Intervenors have requested the issuance of Licensing Board subpoenas for thirteen experts, each possessing i
first-hand knowledge directly relating-to the seismic safety.
issues before this Licensing Board.
For a variety of reasons, both the Staff and Applicant oppose the Intervenors' request.
This reply addresses those arguments.
I.
A.
The Intervenors have requested the issuance of 1
Licensing Board subpoenas to five experts who are presently employees of the United States Geological Survey (USGS).
The i
f USGS consults to the NRC Staff on the Diablo Canyon licens'ing review.
The Staff indicates that two USGS empicyees will be t
-1/
made available for cross examination at the hearing.
These 1/
STAFF'S RESPONSE TO INTERVENORS' MOTION REQUESTING THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSING BOARD SUBPOENAS, at 4. [ cited here-inafter as STAFF'S RESPONSE].
- $4?Oly g
4 2.
two USGS employees, however,-are not among the five experts identified in the Intervenors' motion.
The Staff argues that issuance of Licensing Board subpoenas to compel the attendance and testimony of the five USGS employees identified in the.
Intervenor's motion violates the Commission's~ Rules of
~
Practice.
1 Issuance of Licensing Board subpoenas to compel the attendance and testimony of consultants to the NRC is controlled by 10 CFR 52.720thl(21(il.
That rule permits the Executive Director. for Operations to designate the person (s) who will present the Staff position, and it prohibits the Licensing Board-from requiring the attendance and testimony of any other.
NRC personnel ~2/
except upon a showing of. exceptional circum-stances.
The Staff argues that the Intervenors have failed to make the required showing.
We disagree.
First, the discovery.of a major active fault within two and one-half miles of the Diablo Canyon site has-resulted in 4
exceptional circumstances for the issuance of the operating.
license:
issuance of the operating license depends on 3/
proof that Diablo Canyon, with very few modifications, can withstand an earthquake substantially greater than
-2/
As used in 52.720, "NRC personnel" means persons acting in the capacity of consultants to the Commission.
- See, 10 CFR 2. 4 (pl.
-3/
The only significant modification to Diablo Canyon are structural modifications to the turbine building, (SER, Supp.
7, at 3-37, 3-38, and 3-45).
i
3.
that for which it was originally designed and constructed.
The original safe shutdown earthquake for the Diablo Canyon facilities corresponded to a 0.40g horizontal ground-acceleration to be used for development of design response spectra. -4/ The safe shutdown earthquake now postulated by the Staff for the facility corresponds to a 0.75g horizontal S/.
ground acceleration.
The circumstances of this proceeding are exceptional because the Staff has significantly reduced the accepted margins of safety-to approve the design and construction of Diablo Canyon.
Diablo Canyon is second-rate in safety.
The ACRS concedes as much:
I Since there are expected to be significant differences between the nature of the ground motions close to a large earthquake and that at greater distances, to which most available data apply, the Staff relied heavily on the experience and judgment of its consultants, N.M.
Newmark, an acknowledged expert in the field of earthquake engineering and structural design.
On his advice, an effective =ero-period acceleration of-0.75g was used to deter-mine the free-field response spectra to be used in engineering analyses.
These spectra were then reduced by varying amounts to obtain spectra for those structures in the plant having foundations extending over large areas.
This reduction for the effects of building size is also based largely on judgment and experience rather than on extensive observations or analyses and has not heretofore been applied in the design of nuclear power plants.
4/
SER., Supp. No. 1, at 2-14.
5/
SER, Supp. No.
4, at 2.
1 4.
The seismic design criteria proposed by
-3 the Staff permitted the use of damping factors for structures in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.61 in place of the lower, and thus more' conservative, values used by?
the Applicant in the original design.
The Staff also permitted the use of as-built dimensions and masses, and' material strengths determined from tests during construction, rather than the more con-servative values used in the original design.
It ir evident from the foregoing that the design ba'ses and criteria utilized in the seismic reevaluation of the Diablo Canvon Station for the postulated Hoscri event are in certain cases less conservative than those that would be used for an-original desian.
[ Emphasis added] 6/
In view of these extraordinary' circumstances that rai3e substantial, nagging questions regarding the safety of:this facility, it is incumbent on the Licensing Board. to assure i
compilation of the most complete record possible.- No stone should be left unturned. 'The five USGS experts identified-in the Intervenors' motion are uniquely qualified to assist the Board in making a comprehensive record.' Messrs. McCullough and Wagner have done the actual field work in mapping-the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system.
Both assisted'in the 1
preparation of the most recent USGS review for the NRC of the. geologic data relevant to the - Diablo Canyon site, dated
~6/
Letter from Stephen Lawroski, Chairman, ACES to the Honorable Joseph M.
Hendrie, Chairman,'NRC, dated Joly 14, 1978, at 2-3.
4 r-w-
. - - -,---,~
i-, -.,.
s
9 5.
April 29, 1976. Their testimonyLwill provide first-hand 9
knowledge of facts material-to establishing the_ structural' definition of.the Hosgri-San ~Gregorio fault system, i.e.,
the interrelationship of the various branches of the fault system.
That interrelationship is important'in assessing the maximum earthquake potential of the system-- that is, how much of the fault could " break" in a single event. -7/.
Dr. Joyner is a principle author of the USGS Circular 672, which describes the near field accelerations. expected from a 7.5 magnitude earthquake.
Dr.-Joyner's work is the basis from which the Staff purports to derive. the 0.75g hori-zontal acceleration used in the reanalysis of the Diablo Canyon seismic design.
Dr. Joyner's testimony will pro-vide expert opinion on the peak acceleration to be expected in the near field of large earthquakes in the magnitude range 6.5-8.0.
I Drs. Bonilla and Mark are principle authors of the USGS publication describing the empirical relationship between earthquake magnitude and fault length.
The fault length-magnitude relationship was considered by USGS in designating 7.5 as the maximum earthquake potential of the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system.
The work of Drs. Bonilla and Mark i
l 7/
See, Affidavit of Richard B. Hubbard, INTERVENORS' REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSING BOARD SUBPOENAS, at 3-8 [ cited hereinaf ter as. Affidavit of Richard B. Hd:!zrd].
8/
See, Affidavit of Richard B.
Hubbard, at 9-10.
6.
suggest that-the USGS may have understated the maximum earth-quake potential of the Hosgri-San Gregcrio fault system.
In-sum, Diablo Canyon raises _ exceptional safety-concerns.
i l
-The facility is sited next to a major fault and was orig nal y designated for an earthquake substantially smaller than that designated.as the safe shutdown earthquake.. Instead of requiring modification, the Staff has significantly reduced safety margins to approve the design and construction of the facility.
The cir'cumstances justify the issuance of subpoenas to the USGS experts who are uniqusly qualified to present expert testimony.
B.
The Staff argues that the two USGS witnesses it will present are better qualified to present the USGS position because they, not Messrs. McCullough and Wagner, " participated in synthesizing the overall information into a bottom-line position." --10/ That argument' misses the point.
Messrs.-Wagner and McCullough are called not to present the USGS bottom-line position, but to present their opinion of the structural definition of the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system obtained from their first-hand field observa-tions. The Staff-sponsored witnesses may well be qualified 9/-
See, Affidavit of Richard B.
Hubbard, at 9-10.
l_0/
STAFF'S RESPONSE, at 4.
6
7.
[
to present the synthesized, USGS botton-line position;
~
however, they are poor substitutes for Messrs. McCullough and Wagner on matters relating to the McCullough and Wagner field observations.
It is important for the record to reflect those first-hand observations.
The Staff suggests that "if after the presentation of the Staff's USGS witnesses the Board wishes to hear from Mr. Wagner and Mr. McCullough, the Staff will make them available." --11/
However, assurances that Messrs. Wagner and McCullough will be hovering in the wings, is simply not enough.
Experience demonstrates that cross examination of the person with first-hand experience often results in disclosure of significant details that are filtered-out in synthesis and review.
Cross examination of the Staff-sponsored witnesses may give no hint as to the significant information that Messrs. McCullough and Wagner could L=part.
11/
See, Affidavit of Richard B. Hubbard, at 4.
8.
,e C.
The Staff asserts that the Intervenors failed to demonstrate that the participation of Drs. Bonilla, Mark and Joyner "would aid the Board in making its ultimate determination."
The Staff fails even to mention the extensive proffer regarding the relevance of these expert's contribution to the seismic safety issues before this 12/
~~
Licensing Board.
Intervenors submit that an adequate showing has been made, and request the Board to reject the Staff's unsupported assertion.
II.
A.
The Staff argues that the request to subpoena Drs. Trifunac and Luco should be denied because, first, the Intervenors have failed to make a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and second, they are prote.cted by the ruling in Aeschliman. ~~13/Intervenors have already outlined the 10/
See, Affidavit of Richard Hubbard, at 9-13.
11,/
Aeschliman v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 547 F.2d 622, 631 1D.C. Cir. 1978), rev'd on other grounds
~ub gem.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, s
U.S.
55 L.
Ed. 2d 460 (1978).
1
9.
extraordinary circumstances surrounding this proceeding. --14/
[
In light of these circumstances and the Board's duty to make a definitive finding of safety, every effort should be made to call upon those who can materially assist the Board in its task.
No two experts are better qualified to do so than Drs. Trifunac and Luco.
Both are acknowledged experts in the field of earthquake engineering and both served as con-sultants to the ACRS during its assessment of the Diablo Canyon seismic design basis.
And of particular note here, both have published substantial criticisms of the Staff and Applicant reanalysis. ~~15/
Of the design spectrum used for the reevaluation of the Diablo Canyon facility, Dr. Luco has stated:
In my opinion, the free-field design spec-trum used for re-evaluation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant do s noc reflect the strong motion at the site for a 7.5 magni-tude earthquake at an epicentral distance of 5 kilometers, but rather the motion for a 6.5M earthquake at that distance. 16/
14/
Supra, at 3-4.
There is some doubt as to whether Drs.
Trifunac and Luco fall within the category of people for whom a showing of " exceptional cbrur _ance" must be made to authorize issuance of a subpoena.
10 CFR 2.4 (p) does not include consultants to advisory committees as "NRC personnel" for the purpose of S2.720.
The point, however, is moot because exceptional circumstances can be demon-stated here.
15/
See, Affidavit of Richard B.
Hubbard, at 14-18.
_16/
Ibid, at 15.
10.
Regarding the Staff's application of the Tau effect and
+
damping in the seismic reanalysis, Dr. Trifunac observed at a 1976 ACRS subcommittee meeting:
.... This is the first time that I have had the opportunity to see a whole sequence of procedures that are impressing me as going in one direction which is reducing something-that we would call effective acceleration. 17/
In a recent decision, the Commission reminded the Staff of its obligation t6 implement the Commission's open-door policy about differing professional opinions, with particular focus on the Staff's testimony at Licensing Board hearings. ~~18/
That reminder underscores the Commission 's concern that consi-deration of scientific _ opinions, differing from the Staff's position, be reflected in the Commission's decision.
That concern is relevant to the issuance of Licensing Board sub-poenas to Drs. Trifunac and Luco.
For over two and one-half years, Drs. Trifunac and Luco have offered significant and well-informed criticisms of the Staff's and Applicant derivation of design response spectra for the reanalysis of Diablo Canyon's seismic design.
Issuance of Licensing Board subpoenas to obtain the testimony of Drs.
Trifunec and Luco is consistent with the Commission's concern for development of a record that reflects competing scientific viewpoints.
17/
Affidavit of Richard B.
Hubbard, at 12-18.
~~18/
In the Matter of Carolina Power & Light Comoanv, Shearon Harris Nuclear _ Power Plant, Units l',~17I & 4),
CLI-78-9, 8 NRC (Slip Op., at 3).
2 11.
,B.
The Staff argues that-issuance of Licensing Board
- 9 subpoenas to Drs. Trifunac and Luco is' barred by the. decision in Aeschliman. --19/
In that case, an'intervenor requested the Licensing Board to permit discovery-from individual.ACRS members in. order -to probe certain statements bl an ' ACRS letter to the
~
Commission.
The Court agreed with the intervenor that further s
explanation of the ACRS letter was necessary, but held that discovery from inditidual ACRS members was not the proper way k.;,
to obtain it:
1 Turning to the propriety of discovery directed -
to individual ACRS members and ACRS documents, we conclude it was not error to deny these
' ' ~;
requests.
ACRS' unique role as an: independent "part of the administrative procedures in chapter 16 of the Act," supra, is' sufficient 1.y-analogous to that of an administrative decision
-makers to bring into play the rule that the
" mental processes" of such a " collaborative instrumentality of justice" are not ordinarily subject to probing.
United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S.
409, 422, 61.S.Ct. 979, 55-L. Ed.
1429 (.19 41).
This rule is particularly.appro-priate in light of the ACRS' collegial composi-tion such that no individual may speak-for the-i group as a whole. 20/
The rule against probing the " mental processes" of independent administrative decision-makers, invoked by the Court in Aeschliman, is not applicable here.
In Aeschliman, the issue was whether the Licensing Board should issue a subpoena to a member of the ACRS to explain an ACRS position.
Here, however, the issue is whether the Licensing Board should 19/
Aeschliman v.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, supra,.at 20/
Aeschliman v.
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, supra, at 631.
l' e
x_
12.
/
e 4
issue a subpoena to /$ consultant to the_ ACRS in order to -
obtain his expert opinion.
Neither Dr. Trifunac nor Dr.
' Luco is a member of the ACRS, and regardi,ess of t e ruling j
in Aeschliman, neither is in a position to' speak on behalf
/
i of the ACRS. / Each,',however, is in a position to provide i
essential factualeand expert testimony bearing directly upon
,i the safety issued in controversy in this proceeding.
Furthermor,e, in Aeschliman, there was,an adequate sub-y?
[,5), stitute to con ucting discovery on indiv% dual;$CRS members.
- s,,
F The Court ordered the NRC to return the AC,RS letter to the f
ACRS for,claritication.
Here, however, there is no substitute f
i to\\obtain/n,qthetes'timonyofDrs.Crifunac.andLucofor_the
~
2 3
rece r,d.
With^the exception of the Staff and Applicant' experts, v
noqualifiedscibatistshavestudied-indetailthederivation
/
r r
4 of the 'desigh response spectra for Diablo Canyon as, have Drs.
Trifunac and Luco.
/
,f
]
Finally, if for reasons of comity, this Board is reluctant to subpoena Drs. Trifunac and Luco, Intervenors suggest that
/, j, -
lrhe Licensing Board invite the two experts, by letter, to
/
attend and present testimony.
)
III.
j.
A.
Ofrthe remaining six witnesses, four are a'i,sociated with
'/
21/
with Universities, ~~
one with a joint government-university j>
(#
9
~
i 21/.iDr. El,;. Silver, University of California-Santa Crus; Dr. Claren6e Hall, Jr.,
University 61 California; Dr.'Wil1Mr.m Dickinson, Stanford University; 3and Dr.
e James'Biune, University of Califorhia-San Diego)e i
'r f'
,i 3
3 r
n
'a y
?
13.
/
22/
23/
~~
'research inst'.tute,
- and one with a private corporation.
~
1 All six have indicated that they are prepared to offer testi-tc many, but for a variety of reasons, are reluctant to appear
.cn1 behalf'of the Intervenors.
Each of these six witnesses
' t,f is>in a position to provide essential factual and expert testimony v ?
~
bearing upon tiie safety issues in controversy in this proceeding.
Dr._ Eli Silver has first-hand field experience and directed the first USGS scientific exploration of the fault system following the disclosure of its existence by Shell Oil Company geologists.
He has studied extensive aeromagnetic data in order to determine whether there is continuity in the 24/
~~
Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system.
Dr. Silver's testimony will provide direct knowledge of facts material to establishing the stract6ral definition
_1, and the potential for movement the Hobgri-San Gregorio fault system.
on, Dr. Clarence Hall has conducted substantial field work
- -f '
at the southern end of the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system.
Dr. Hall draws conclusions from his detailed work with
~
vy strat igraphic observations about the amount and nature of 25/
'T historical displacement along the southern end of the fault.
1 22/
Dr.
W.
Gawthorp, Cooperative Institute For Research In Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado-NOAA.
i
- s 23/
Dr. Stephen Graham, Chevron.
- { t 24/
See, Affidavit of Richard B.
Hubbard, and Attachments B & F.
25/
Ibid, at 3-7, and Attachments C, H& I.
4-c
'+'
-1 eor --,,.
- r---
r y
m--
v w
--w 7,
i.,,
-e
14.
Drs. Graham and Dickinson conducted similar studies of the 26/
i northern end-of the fault.
As described in the Affidavit 1
of Richard B. Hubbard accompanying the Intervenors' original motion, the cestimony of these three experts provides first-hand knowledge of facts material to establishing the structurcl t
f definition of the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system and the i
potential for movement in the present.
Dr. W. Gawthrop, formerly with USGS, has studied the location of the 1927 earthquake (7.2 magnitude), and its relationship to the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault'. 2]/
Dr.
i Gawthrop's testimony will be directly related to establishing l
the present potential for movement along the fault system.
Dr. James Brune has prepared work examining the phenom menon of focussing high frequency energy by a propagating source, such as a fault.
Dr. Brune testified before the ACRS, at the invitation of the ACRS.
His testimony, at that time, established that the phenomenonaof focussing is relevant to assessing the adequacy of Diablo Canyon's se.tmic 28/
design:
'In the case of the Diablo Canyon nuclear reactor, given the assumptions that the San Simeon-Hosgri fault system is a con-l tinuous active fault coming within 5 km 26/
Ibid, and Attachments D, E & G.
27/
SER., Supp.
4, at C-19 & 20.
29/
See, Affidavit of Richard 3. Hubbard, at 13-19 and
. Attachment M.
4 5
,=-
15.
of the Diablo Canyon nulcear power plant, focussing by rupture propagation (from --
s northwest to southeast) could lead to anomolous high accelerations, possibly greater than 2g.
At the present time, it is not possible to say what the probability of such high accelerations is.
Many of the factors necessary for estimating the probability are being intensively studied and should be much better understood in a year or two.
Neither the Staff nor the Applicant has adequately addressed 29/
this matter.
B.
The Staff argues that tne request to subpoena the six experts listed above should be denied because, first, upon the proper showing, Intervenors can command their appearance by requesting subpoenas and, therefore, the request for Licensing Board subpoenas is but a " thinly veiled device to obtain financial assistance from the NRC;"
and second, the Intervenors failed to demonstrate that appearance of the witnesses is either necessary or would be beneficial in the development of the record. --30/
We agree:
the Commission has no obligation to finance the Intervenors.
However, the Commission does have an obligation to provide reasonable assurances that the operation
- of Diablo Canyon will not unduly jeopardize public health I
29and safety.
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International 29/
Ibid, at 19.
~~
30/
STAFF R"SPONSE, at 5-7.
16.
Elec,tricians Union, 367 U.S. 396 (1961).
Substantial and nagging safety concerns surround 31/
Diablo Canyon.
Each of the thirteen witnesses identified in the Intervenors' motion is uniquely qualified to provide facts and expert testimony which will materially assist the Board in resolving contested safety issues.
In view of these exceptional circumstances, safety concerns overide.
concerns for the purse and fully justify issuance of the requested subpoenas.
However, should the financial concerns pose a hurdle, Intervenors request the Licensing Board to subpoena the above mentioned experts, and permit cross examination by all parties, with the understanding that Intervenors will bear all costs.
B.
-The Staff argument that the Intervenors failed to demonstrate that participation by Drs. Silver, Hall, Graham, Dickinson, Gawthrop and Brune would aid the Board in making its ultimate decision is an unsupported argument.
The Staff fails to address the Intervenors' extensive proffer.
We request the Board to reject this argument.
III.
A.
For its par.t, the Applicant argues that (1) the Affidavit of Richard B. Hubbard should be struck; (2) 31/
Supra, at 6.
17.
Aeschliman bars the issuance of subpoenas to Drs. Trifunac and Luco, the ACRS consultants; (3) the request violates the Commission's rule against providing financial assistance to Intervenors; and (4) the Applicant's rights would be violated by issuance of the requested subpoenas.
Arguments (2) and (3) have previously been addressed above.
We here address arguments (1) and (4). --32/
~
B.
The Applicant asserts that the Affidavit of Richard B..Hubbard should be struck because,,it contains hearsay and the affiant is not qualified to testify on matters contained in his Affidavit.
The Applicant's argu-ment misses the point; the point is that Mr. Hubbard's Affidavit is offered to demonstrate the relevance and materiality of the testimony expected to be obtained from the thirteen experts.
The Affidavit is offered to support the request for the issuance of subpoenas.
It is not offered to support findings of fact related to the issues in conten-tion.
Certainly, Mr. Hubbard's technical background qualifies him to describe generally the relevance and materiality of 33/
the testimony expected to be obtained.
32/
RESPONSE OF PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY TO INTERVENORS' REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF LICENSING BOARD SUBPOENAS,
-~
[ cited hereinafter as APPLICAMT'S RESPONSE].
In the Matter of Public Service Co. of Okla-33/
- See, e.g.,
boma, et al,- (Black Fox Station, Units 1 & 2), Licensing
~~
Board Order, September 8, 1978.
18.
Additionally,' Applicant's insistance that the rule against hearsay testimony be strictly applied is contrary to accepted administrative procedure.
This is particularly true in a case where, as here, the affidavit is offered to describe generally the testimony expected to be obtained from other experts.
C.
The Applicant complains that issuance of the requested subpoenas.will prejudice its rights by denying
.it the opportunity to prepare adequately for cross examina-tion of the experts.
The Applicant gives the. impression that it is in the dark with respect to the testimony expected to be ob'tained from the thirteen experts and argues that depositions would be useless. ~~34/
The Applicant has mislead the Board.
The Applicant or their consultants are intimately familiar with the work of each of the. thirteen experts.- Drs. Trifunac and Luco, over the c'ourse of the last two years, have submitted extensive written comments to the ACRS regarding the deriva-tion of the design response spectra used in reanalysis of Diablo Canyon.
Certainly, the Applicants have studied those comments extensively.
Dr. Hall, in June, 1976, and Dr. Brune, in June, 1977, presented testimony to the ACRS and responded to questioning 31 /
APPLICANT'S RESPONSE, at 5.
19.
from. members of the ACRS.
The Applicant.was there.
More-t over, documents obtained through discovery indicate.that this Spring, the Applicant was concerned about Dr. Brune's focussing. phenomenon and was well aware of Dr. Hall's views on the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault system.
Those same documents indicate that the Applicant has-continuously monitored the opinions of various scientists regarding the Hosgri-San Gregorio fault, including Drs.
35/
Silver, Graham, Hall, Gawthrop, Dickinson and McCullough.
Nor is there any reason to believe that the Applicants are not fully aware of the work of Drs. Bonilla, Mark and Joyner.
The work of these experts was cited as the basis for the USGS conclusion in SER, Supp. 4, issued in May, 1976.
Finally, it is reasonably evident from the Affidavit of Richard B. Hubbard and the work attached thereto what Given the testimony would be expected from these experts.
arsenal of seismic and geologic consultants on the Applicant's payroll, their familiarity over the course of 2 years with the work of all thirteen experts, and the availability of depositions, the Applicant complaint that it is prejudiced is not supportable.
Moreover, following the testimony of these witnesses, the Applicant may take the opportunity to submit rebuttal testimony.
35/
Drs. Wagner and McCullough have worked together on the Hosgri project for USGS.
~~
I
1 20.
-One final note:
the Applicant implies that Applicant c
alone is at a disadvantage for not having testimony pre-filed by the thirteen witnesses.
The Applicant is no more at a disadvantage than the Intervenors.
In fact, given the resources at his command, he is better off.
IV.
For the reasons set forth above, Intervenors request that its motion be granted.
In the alternative, Intervenors request that the thirteen experts be subpoenaed with the Intervenors bearing all costs and that cross examination be permitted by all parties.
Respectfully submitted, David S. Fleischaker, Esq.4b 1025 Fifteenth Street, N.W.
Suite 602 Washington, D.C.
20005 (202) 638-6070 John P. Phillips, Esq.
Steve Kristovich, Esq.
Center For Law In The Public Interest 10203 Santa Monica Boulevard Fifth Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Attorneys For SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INCc SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE ECOLOGY ACTION CLUB SANDRA SILVER JOHN J.
FORSTER SEPTEMBER 23, 1978
w.u.a.9
,..n.,
w. w.,n.i:.s e v.- a ei:
w.*.a u.-u N6A tw.;A rt Lt.- e ApAAT 8A5tN AND ITS ELATION TO Th! SAN SIMEON-HC3G:1 FAUI.T, CAUFC".NIA
. Hell, Cior2no A., Decert%ent of Earth end Sposo Sciences, Univershy of California, to Angitis, Californie 90:324
- . A speculative r-edel Is prooosed to account for the distribution of Tertiary igneous, sediment ry, and voic=n;chstic rock.: ther lie within the is poe-Santa Mario reglen, Sense !crboro County, Colii:re.ie. Co,aporisons of ihhologies and strati-grophic sect *ons support the hysoshesis ther th-fe*+i-a* Weee ~ ears M-4 %
Is o ou!! - wse? s* se*ure. It is peoaosed ther Ine santo mctsa over onc hsnc.:
(
Jown ore port on ne sr no tr=nsform or right-loterol f= ult system end, betere the pulling sport of the Lernpoc-Scare Mario bcsin, w'ere o single I: ult er fcult systeni.
The fonestion of the pull-encer tosin bogen fo!! wing depcaDion of the Sesse-i Lospe, Vo ver:s, Rincon, cad Chis=o(=Treneuillen) and pcrt of the Pe;nt 5:1 recic waits, Cf particuler note is the fe:t ther ce:remimately CO m of mid=!e Miocene voiceniciasJic rocks are ciuing immediatriy southwest or the Sants Merio River-e' fault, but cre present 35 to 45 les further to the southwest and on the southwest osergin of ther La.poc-Sento Merio b= sin.
l Because teletively incemoetent Franciscan rocks forming the
- floor
- of the '
bonin spoorently were e=sily stretched, little volc=nic or intrusive cetivitysc-curred centemporaneously with the pull cocrt. Necr the comslation of the pull-opcrt, sediments mo'aing up the Point Sol end ycunger Tenicry formations flooded the bcsia. Fino!!y, fattowing ceocsition of sne fare Tenicry seciments,Me the we.te- - -r ef t', lea w.-s d%--d n--tv eo ' -, o % ae%.est eien son M -- - ---. r--n r.
RCSGRIFAU: ":C:TI; mb"TRE, A. CUNT C7 DISPI.ACC.tC l, AND w" C 3 MP TC STT.*.TC2ES CT TZI.u
.; EN T2A:: v.>.;I 2A::CI:2 ram *, R "w '.as H., a=d Te""- *CEA:J, C.P'*--d, Zarc Scie =cas Associates, he., 701 Wekh Z: d, P:lo A1:n, Callbr=is $4004 The geolm;y of the c '"are re;ional.;thec=:: :s=::1sar.-bolseca car..al a
r*We has been =a;oed ust=g geophysical a=:1 s:=ti;r:phic da:s derived from power -'- *1icenst=g studies:sdpetroles.=Lespic= :.:n. Withm t. hts area,
. the near shore Hos;;t,52:S!meo=, a::1 Sur'--N for=1 the principalhou:dsries between the onshors upli.*: of the saucern Coast 3:=;ss 2=d the of.fshoes ha-st=s. The sis pa:: of the Eas;:1i=h, the :=ost scude:ty af this series, de.
!!nes a 1haar =c:e that ::ses N25W:=d ex:e=ds over 21:S k=sdis:s=:e betwee:
,the vid-'"es of Pois:Ssi:=d Ca;ssa=2.h:::=. A1: ou-h ce E:s;;i fauh:o=e servalas a bou:d: y s::---" s trid predo='---"Y ver teal d!r-'s-a- *-:s car.-
1=+ inidf e "*e -*2 r tL-9. 3 aver:1lheso&enee:ce1::ics:s::2:1::a Te- :-v n:ove- -e:s e-- --- --- --' ---ch er ^ ' * '- d - ' - - '7- - e - - *-- :
' leas-in e:-. by -:::::hU: _;!)L S. 2:i;:2;his evide::e hasad os cc::; sri-son of the see: cs ;esa::2:ec by the **Ce?:=o No.1" well, be::ed rss: of ce -
3
' fault, w!:1 secti::s ess: of the hdt, !=dic: es s. =srt==:. of -te r M ** ** t--
L o f -!-h t h--
' "- '--- *S e F- -H - -' -- - ' 1
- s:
?. -as Inars!
slip is accc~--ad :.: falt: ::d reverse sLp s:iays s: t e to:*.h==4 ssch ands of the hdt:-..e. S;127 '.. uhs at tha s=uth end of de East-1, ::d both fadts a=d hids 6 the g=c=d farcer sou2, bz:d t:3-d a=d :=u:=sny hterfere with fad:s 2:dIshis ex - " ! seava:fiI:=m the T::=sverse Ras ss provbce to the east. A pa::ers of 1:: :fere=ce, rscar thss ::.:=ca:6s of c=s sysem=: by the othar, sppsrs=:17 rssdis fr=====:1 :::c==edc!cs henvers the :.;ht.
laterni moce=e=:s cf *.as Eas;;i systa=L a=d the lefila:er:1 =cve=e=:s of the Transverse P.::;ss system.
ARE THE SAN CZIOC2:3 A:D :-OSC3 TACTT 0NIS A S :::i~2 TAUT.*
- SYSTC'.?
S r N- - ' " '
t., Ear-h Sciences 3 card, "siversity of Cata:cen.s, San:s Crc, CA 95C54 a
Marry lines of evidence 1=ad :o :he cen:Lusion of ever 100 les of 12:eral offse alen; both faul: ::nes sines early Miocene. E: '1. -- W W 1'3--
- = eive er'd--:- ' -- - + M e n ? o t-e :
s-- v -. - - - - ~ ~ - ;2 =. - -. - - - - <.: ~ t e.n aucus
-.e e - s n o - i-- t i- * -t -. o : n
--M' a-occu.
.- e-e : t e,.
In:arman;; 7, :na resut:s c:
.giocal pta:e re:cc.s:: :: ens su;I;es: av-er-Pacific-A= erica s!. ear was nearly parallet :o :ne presen: San Cre-gorio-Mesgri trend in ear 17 to ciddle Miocene. No un==in-1:f exists as to une:her er=== the San Greg:rio and Hesgri faul:s cenne::. The critical region is be:veen Meneerey and jus: sou:h of ?:. Ser. Any proj e : ion of :he San Gra-gorio sou:h of Mencerey re:utres the faul: :o bend SI, and joining ui:h the Hat;-i involves ene less: bendi=;. Mao-ping a ee:nple:c coastal and nearshore faul: syste= is diffi-cul: bu: we hope to have a clearer pic:ure of :his inter-section by the ti=e of this sv=::::1::n as a resul: o f de-tailed sere-sgne:1: surveys ens: have been flown bu: no:
yet released. l
?W- ' ults 43 'nieed Mv-ava-IN N h(,,
t D h e
o n,--.
s-m - &
.-. o
- ~.
I E-
,L), U (O
,, - - n v u., c, w w -.. ~..
par-
--t~
. s - :., :n: u;
- ne ru
- :.- :
u;:per :.n:Lc.
p 1
_,._---------------.m
, @racts et Symposittm on ths San Gregorio - Hosgriist:lt system" April E77 e.
.[*
9 cardiner::n Ssetion Mctting of tha Geological Society of America.
.e sia.mC Arnie ComasTs u: mss :n sax Cxrcous runx, swa can am:s.Atss, utsT C: mar. Cu.:rCn:ts CLApx,.reseph C., zadtana u.Lveritty of p.easylv ta, :ndtana, '
r a.r1vania m ol: susa, mari r., v.s. C togical :urvey, m atadlafi.14 a.ad, nea. tars Cauforata 54cis The oeshese trace of the saa Cregorie fault estands free coastal sape,uses east of A3s 2:ueve Point northwestward foe 27 k:n (16 si) to the caans sear San Cregsria. This Alt kaa ju. :aposed two majee testesic blocks with markedly di!! erect stratigraphic seguences, suggeetjes th.ac the fault hsa eamensive lateral displacsomes.
In the Pigeos ?olat block southwest of the saa Cregocio faalt, Perphyric14 milicic roc *as car form part of the basemenet they are everlaim by at lasst. 2,5C0 m (3,%0 f t) of clasti: strata of Lata Cretaceous age. Cretaceous scrata are nec pressat in the La Honda and Bea Lo=eod blocks r.or:heast of the fault where more than 10,C00 m (33 CCO f t) of Paleocese to 711ocene rocks rests on a pre-recciary-granitic basemest.
Paleocase a.:.1 Zacean rocks are not present in the Figeon Polac block. Cligocesa (:e=merna) and r.iddle Miocene fu "* - and Laist.aa) strata oc=ur is both tec:anic hiscks. has t. hey di.ffer in lithology, fauna, and bathy=st.ry on opposita sidea.
A thic.k upper Miocese to lower Fliocesa udatane sectime in the 1.4 Iceda and Sea L.aaned bioch.s is missing west of the fault.
AFFARINT CTT!!:S C7 C:f-C.12:3 CMO TE17:1ES M TME SA:t C 30:2:3-ECSCR TA:l7.T TZ::!3 CIAHAM, Stephas A., Irploracios Department, Vesters Regime.
Chevron U.S.A., 20s 3362, San Francisco, California 94113; D10%::
2005, W1*11231., Ceology Departseac, Stamford Caiversity, Stamford, Califaeria 94303 The Saa cr*,e-* s 2es--*
f ae - w.4,* reughly co'Wa=e with tha preseas cea:ral Caillar:
fault systan, =s* W - --* *--- J1a coastaise and a componeet of the San Andreaa s
- =***--*--*-*^-W.
Evid e-
, '-- ** -"-s t e es-se of ossiht e sa tts e? s f S.?
.- t - - -T f es t*:r* 9.
- '.se---
Q nearly idensacr.1 Isrtaary sequeocas ac 7 stas Reyes and la sne southern Santa Cruz Maustaisa, Csimi.ar C.staceous atraca of the westers Santa Crus Mauscatas asd ner:nera Saeca 1.ucia Raese. Q the structural contac:
Trasciscan( ce= plex ner:.h of Zodaga Ea.sd amt in the n between granis.Le basement and
) fountains, (4) tectonic slabs cf Espar-bearing sandstonee withis the s'
F e---"~
r.a"I* ales near Prisc Su.t and Ca=stia, m Frsaciscao-derived Mimeano sandstone naar Pois: 3rs; a=d potencial s'~ource terrases ts the aouth, and Q) id==oic, ophielf.:n and everfyfsg Terrfary seccia s test Sea Simeos and Poisc 541.
post-early Miocess a=4 probably post-late Miocene.The suggenced ri;.t-slip Saa Cregori e sgri faul:
3 =*== a the tre:4 intarsects the $as Aat: ass fault effshore south of 3clinas, the tscal apparent offsee of granitic base-
- mest along the San Andreas fault is actually the sua of offasts on the San Cregorio-Easg:1 and San A=dreas faul:
4 Ca=parisoa of rise.-
displacemene carves decur_-strztas that these eve taalta aceauer for : mach of the mat-cligocene displace =ent be=ueen the Pacific and tor:h Americas places.
Recocsition of !!eogene San Gregorio-Ersfri right-slip thus reduces considerzo17 the apparent cas=1:ude of ritar-slip alass as early Tar:1ary prut:>-San Andreas fault.
5:.27tz::tG CF ~::: "F *'.m r 2:cc Arzn:c *.23 FAT.D C::::. ORA:D-$3N GtE=2.:3 M.J A5;oCIA:2 TACT.:" =:CS CRI::st, 5. Gary, U. 3. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.
$4325 Displacement alon'y facits within the nort. west-trending Pala colozado-san Cresorte and Monterey say f.ault :enes and along the newly nara<f Ascension fault =ay provsds an explanarma ts: the apparent discrepancy in total offset along the saa Asd eas fault syste:s in cent =al and sooth-ern Calif 3rnia-FeCent seiaaicary 1 dicates that the first two fault nones are active and are c=derising rigs slip. Ta..is activity probably reflects st.res.s release along the sae Andreae fault syntam of whics these senes are a part.
Right slip within these Saul: nones has siivered the salinian bimek A probable resul: of this silvering 1.s the production of a serrstml rather taan a linear westers mar 7La far the black. As the -d i ma
}
black moved rerthwestwstd along tha Sam andreas fault, this seerstad margias would have bees frae;=ented. with trac =ents and slivers of hasee,nt ree'c.s pushed ahead of or carried alang seaward of the block.
A rodal for the taetonic sliverisvy and alongation of the Sal.inf aa
\\-
bloch is proposed on the basis of the sense of reverast and patters of f.aulting caserved in the centest part of the bloc.z.
Rigne slip L
along tse Palo Catarad.s-San reincia faulr. none and o1Jer (pre-Pliocene) g n (p c.,r)
Asce.asion fault presably has offset the lower part of ranterey Canyon
- L, U
V V e'7 ( w airipet continun. sly far the pesc 20 n.y.
These displaced seq =en=s were ashuend during the Plekstocene ami emisc today as pioneer an.1
=
Ascension Canyons. ':he present, distance between the das canyone.
110 h.a. is a neaause of s!! set along these faults since midd.le Mlacoce tire. nts codel also provadas an altmenata explanacion for the
,.rigia sai.d.evelo;z=ent o. f suanarine, canyons, that haa.1 on the ***r**--
- ' * ~ ~ ~ ~
e r
y ww--
--4--9,-,.,.
e 9.-.+
.*"*m PACFIC CAS AND E1."CTZIC C::MPANY s= =t e.o. b or sa.
m, *'
GENER A L COMP UT ATION SHcET nuf LOC A ftoss SU4 JECT k j s, A
' h h h -.E /E r
A
/~*
-- )%
w--
n Xee e, on,e
/
e=rence e,
.... ev ro.,
N/ b els !
l I
I i /\\
l
- 1. l I
Isl A22 f 22;-E&dt' Vlb,&.g,L -),,,.-. m _ l Y
l i ':
i'l l
I i
l l
l l
l l
l l
1 I
I I
f M 4,,L M._i.; M-4.. E l f l M,ie !
I I A7 )s Ve l
! 12dA'T I A2, ML' a i\\i l 'lW'3 )
~
i l
!( i i
i l' i i
i i
i l
I I
I I
i I
I l
I i
l',
o 1
l
!l I
I I
I I
!. I I
I l
l 1.1 I
I i
l i
l V,!,,,6 :
i I
i/ $~ l I
I I
I,4!aM !si I,4 L,.;. J l
I i
I i
I I
II I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
l I
i 1I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i II I
I I
I I
I i
I I
I i
i i
i I
l I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
i l
I I
I i
l I
- I i
i I
I i
I i
l I
i i
I I
I l
I i
I i_hra I
$ !/ D I
i I
I l $ A _,* L i r. c I S h/ /('. l,.6 l
t
- i' l i
i I /I I
!i I y_.4'3 !AL,L2s:
i i
! 11 i
C.2- :
- /! 2.!
I I
i i I 4 _'.. b l. i # 2 / -w i
l e
l i
i' l' !
- 3 i
j i
l i
i i
i i
I i
i i
i i
i l
l i
i i
i l
i l
l I
I i
i i
l l
l l
l l
l l
l l
l i
)
l l
l l
j j
l l
l I
I l
e
!,444nga 4c -
d I/LJ M i ec ht i
i 1
I i
l i
i
! 'f i
i l
i i
i i
i i
i i
4-J A.,i/.de i
e 4
,/I I
I I
l l
l 1
I I
i i
i I
l I
i i,!
I I
I I
LI I
i i
i i
I I
i I
i
&$wr.
'YA lA'.=~ N iu~
b J ~~/c., E LJ~iA & - m
) rN Y.. ?
. I __ I k., ! k Y,5
}'>; W I
h ks _ h b
/
2
,,fi,.'//P-vJm
~
irb I i l i
I I
~
I i "1 i
iI i
i I
/ ;;
i i
.;.L!OiiiI I
i i
I i
i l
i I
' 9&v'
--. D 'i c !
i( U '
t t A=l
/}Sm s
~u i
l i
i i
I l1 i
! iYil 1
I i l ' i' i i
i i
l i i i
l 1
I l l /l i
I. }
l i
/ !,'
i
, /~ n t :*1/7' $L L f i L.!, VLsnMi.-J Jd LG O, G.'
,I i 'l
!.i i
i i
I I
I l[.1_I i
I 4 I i /I i
i l
i-i i a M n,d 156 J_._L/b 1 i M I,D L !. I M l6 f) 14C ~
iXc u a J w K sM LALEi m A.Vu.n I Jeu. ~
nWL -..J M J J W ~ -,: ediJWiw.u':
2.
I I
i I
i i
l l
l
[i '
!Ii l
ie I hf l J
~
l-N6@b/d 5 O p'ii 74su/a..' D., ll'
- A.. ~
4 L.c A
.. J A i a i
i i
F fi i
i i
i /i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
l I
I I
I i'!
l i
i i
I i
i i
i l
I I
i l
i i
i l
i l
i
. ~..
]
n, PACIFIC GA5 4.0 ELECTRIC COMPANY sM2ET he.
- or swaETs GEN ER A L COMP U T ATION SHEET s,
L3 CAT 10se w.ne? -
..o..,
o.v.
e-e e.o.,
.......o.,
!I I
ll i
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
i i
li I
I I
l l
l l
i l
i l!4
//1 1 1 W 'f 1l fil ] W l i
I I
i i
l i
l I
i l
't I -l ~ l ~
1,- i Ll l
i i
l ll) l~ l i
I II II i
l l
I i
i i
i j
- Ii'
! I C # b i d i f - W + _la. I A i l f :- 1 I
i l
I I
I i
i i
i kn A M.I L 3, /Fi L--I /!
I i
lI i
I I
I i
I i
i
!l i I #C l l
l i
l i
I I
I I
i i
l I
I i
I l
l l
l 1
I i
i I
i il l
I i
l l
Il l
I i
l l
l l
1 I
I I
i I
i l
I I
i l
I i
l i
I i,.I l
I I
II I
i I
I i, i I
I i
i l
l lC:64/di mI# % b A L!
' X / # $ 6 A -;-
?/.
I i
L ;',. w ; w M I
(
Oi i
l' i l ', ' Fi i/// ;
.; i i
i i
i i
i i
i IT!
i l
I i
i i
i l
I i
i i
i i
il l
1l I
I I
I I
l l_ l I
i I
II i
l i
I l
I I
i I
i i
i i
l I
I I
i l
i i
I I
i l
i i
i i
I l
i l
l 1
i i
i l
i i.I i
+
i 1.l l
i l
l i
I i
i i
i
!^
i i
! l i
I i
i i
i l
i i
l l
- l. i l
i i
l l
i!
I i
i i
i i
ii t
i i
l' i
l.i i
i i
i ii i
I i
i i
i i
i i I i
i i
i i
I i
i i
i l
i i
. t l
I i
i l
i I
l i
l i
i i
i i
l i
i i
I i
I I
I I
I i
I i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
l I
l i
i 1
I ii i
i i
i i
i i
! l I
i i
l i
i l
l I
l i
i I
i i
i i
i i
i i
i I
e i
i i
i i
l j
l I
l I
i I
I I
i i
l I
I i
l l
l 1
I I
I I
i I
i l
i l
1 i
e i
i i
i i
l l
I i
i i
i i
i i
i I
i I
i I
I i
l l
I i
l I
I I
I i
i i
I I
i i
I I
i 1
i i
i l
I l
i I
i i
l I
1 I
l l
I l
l i
i l
I i
i i
i l
i i
i i
i l
i i
I I
I i
I I
I I
I I
I I
i i
i i
I I
I i
i i
i I i i
i l
I I
I I
Il i
l I
i l
i I
I I
I i
i i
i I !
i i
i I
I I
I i
i i
i I
I I
I I
i i
1 i
I i
i i
i l
I i
i I
i i
i I
i i
i i
l i
i l
i l
l i
1 l
l I
i l
i i
l I
i i
I i
i l
i I
i i
l i
i I
i I
i l
i Ii!
i i
l i
i i
i i
l I
I i
i I
I l
l l
1 1
i i
i I
i i
I i
I i
l I
I i
l l
l l
l l
1 I
i i
i i
i
,. +
rycv--+-
t7
M=
Evv r
ew--e g4-
,--wy.g
--v
,w
-. =. _ - -. _ -. _
es, ria um PACIFlc GAS AND ELECTRIC C:'lMPANY s=2sv me.
er sassrs
,' [**
GEN E R A L COM P U T A TION SHEET
af".
JSo 6.cario.
so.u cr
- e.. e.....
......o..
i l-1 I
l l
1 i. !,
I I
I,1 I
I I
I I
lI I
l l
l l
i i
l i
iI i
!/VJ w/ w :.2-A J R.I l e h,ilj.J
!. i i
l i
I I
i I
'lI! _l.I l1 I
l l
l l
l l
l l
I !II I
l_ !
I, I i-i i
I l*
I!
i h ks, lff,.s I
l-- & -) @l I c.$2..r',, - i r-lf M W k,'
'~
l I
l i
l l
I2 l
l l
VI l
i.
l l
l l
! -l l
I' I
l i
I i
I l WY$. Y Y&M&l S^ YM5Ei i <WS A" Jfs.di.S '
ii
- GAY
't%,Z2']I k.L
- 4--L.* 'MJ i-xi-42Dc' 4'.=T2>2--- l I
l
'-dr DAM-FM ii&'.!
l l
l l.l I
I I
i I j.,-J l
i i
i A 'e MU_. */ I CZ) 4#I /2": sir _ 'c C --- M i
e i
I i L --L:f4t&M---I i
I/!
i i
i i
i i
l l (!
[i l
l I
t l
l l
l i
l l
i i
8 I
i
+
i!
!,i i
l i
I!I l
l
!, h _.5 l
i I
l, i i
I i
O.J,A 'G- /,i
~ f &Ac ! Ov-I '"5_, $
?~-i.,x '
i <~~/~) 7 / G i!'=!
f' s
i!
i i
!/ i. (/ !, h i t
- /
l i
i;-
e i E !.8dl% I h -m'.
m G W44.m
_C_In--
l h I d.E. N ! j, /.l A ~ S I w j d4 e' / 7 I
e i
l i
i i
i l' i l
I i
l l
i l
i i
l 1
I l
l l
l 1
i i
1 i
i i
i i
i I
i l
I i
l l
l l
l l
i l
I i
l l
[
i i*!
I i
i I
i i
I i
l i
l l
i I
I i
I i
yp-,
r.
,v s
r e t
- - s,i iii:
i i
l
..> u. +.,
=-o~.
N,
-- +
- Y s'
- t *N W*f* i $
s
- rs n
! /I i ei i
i#!
l
-; UI I
i i
i I
i
'i i
i i
i i
,Y,A
'//
']s M,,,, > $
\\.
As. o
- 2. !c-J.JL a i,.. +-
h= =
- % >-L o v k /'
MGc'
- 9 2.1 '2.4,L,!\\ cp., i t w-f c.r-- G A.'
4a D i
iw T t w 2. N t -997.i - LM, m. !
l i
i Fii
! ?
/
I l
_l l 'I) I i
l I J( l i
i i
IM/7 s
', ' M // :
I l
'?. ' _?.);tY$^ hAv AS1',Jj m
- S.4sb'e$ & em ', C I
I
-I m.
l A
a&
9.Ob
~
ditx_,t,&
'.i l
1 l
I jl i
i l i P i i' i i
i i
i T,.
Zi<,Ao 1
i-i l
l 1,
I i
i I' i l
I 1
i i
i i
i 1
1 i
A L E,i U. '1 r 3 A d % K h
%DM i
!./ - l
/ I l
Il jff :
i i
i I
i I
g 4
M i
i l_ Tfi i
I _1 i41 t
i ~ !
I'/i i
I i
i d Ma) I c/.v;.ef//v,r
!/.L!// 1 5 i
i I
I q
m-GS
.m O -
--e*-
w ur "wes -ww.---e-e-ow, e>r
-a r.-,
e-
-.-.--w-
--e
,--n
,.,-e,,--w-,.-----y-,--m.c, e
m
~-
PAC:FIC CAS AND EL!!CTRIC C::MPANY 8"IE[ "**
F
- *ET8
.-.d GEN ER A L COMP UT ATION SHEET
s.'"'
q JCD L1 CAT 1cM
,o.n er
..e,.,
- o. r e-r e= es.,
.......o.,
l l b!.l_t l
I l
l l
l l
l l
l l
1 l
i l
l l
l 3
l 1
l_
t l ZK; M ! M 4 7# M
!,!,,l i
i l
I I
I I J _-!
I el I
i !. i I I
.l;'
- G3 A M U M i i H M a n'.! l.-1 8 l L F
!(R.X_!
I
'i 1.,,
!. G X t.- f l e i L - M J A M. W, Ll i ( ~
e t r
_l I' !
i
! l' i i
fI l
i i
i I1 i
I 6' i
i i
i T!
!. i l
i, I i
l l
I I
I t
I I
i i
f 5 S.
1- (D &&us 1222 eAe.Al Aw -
kn a l i/*'.. V I.d e E,.: J M c I il !
I I
l l
l I,!
I I
i l
i I
i l #1 i1/ A[0'.A.A h.Isk.! 8 $,saJ.i i22 &Li I l
l li'T) f
_ -d i M. # M, % I L..,,, ;< s /.
i I
i i
i I
f f/ i i
l I
i I
i 1
i l
I i
i i
i i (
- J i / ). !.j,
- -:
I
!. I I
I I
I i
l I
I i
i i
i l
i i
~-.-,.
1 i
I l
i l
I i
i i
l i
l i
i i
i i
l i.
l l
I l
I i
l l
i i
l i
I i
l l
i l
i i
i l
' _l i
i iI i
i
'./V'n/ e /
/;
./:
i
.Lp- >.,,,>
/l.
w
-l i
1 i
6 l
mm 1
i i
j l
t I
i i
i I
i l
Mo =M ! n !-4,1 !
l Ii I
l r
i T
I l
i 0 i
l l
l l
i i
I l
l i
I I
i i
l i
l i
i l
i l
i I
i 1
i i
i l
l l
i i
e Mr l
i i
I l
l I
i l
l i
i i
l l
I i
i l
l l
1 i
I l
i l
i i
i I
6 i
i i
i i
i i
l I
I l
I i
i i
I i
l l
l i
i l
l l
l i
i l
i i
I i
i l
i i
i l
l I
l l
t i
l i
i i
i i
i i
l l
l l
l l
l l
l i
l l
I I
I i
.i l
1 i
i I
I, i.
l l
1 l.
i e
i l
i t
6 e
i i
i i
I l
l
}
l l
i l
l i
i l
l I
f:
I i M g,,i i
i l
i I
i l
l l
l l
i I
i i
i i
i i
i i
i'/3 _ p l. I '
l 1
I I
I l
l I
l I
l I
I l
l
$dy g :
i l
l l
l l
I I
I I
i I
i i
i i
I i
5I.h/ -- /WA. 5'n'
/O%
- e. )
fy s'.. *7 p_.w r a : /_f :'.,s,n
[
i 4
I s
I t
- [
h_,.
O.2 d p+_ d N ia
/:
2..,. w ;.,
P?
D;-W
'V I i I
t i
% // W_,m -s.72.zd.C.,i i
I i
I i
~ ---
PAcwie gas AND Et ECMIC OMPANY sm; U e.o.
S.
sMEUs o.
'N
J33 G E N E R A L C,0 M P U T A T I O N SHEET
'* f "*'
. (^
,/'
al< /t a
socario.
r~~
_c su sa r c1*
p
..... #.Y Go, 3 - 2 /-7d o.n e re=co.,
....,,.3, r
I 'l I
i,1 I
I i, I,v -i l
i i
l i
I I
I I
I I
I I
i l~
- i. I 3.
J._, <l,.-[
Mf,h I I
I I
I l
l l
i l
l
! d/ f'- I
/
l
- . i l
l l
l l
l )
l hel l
I l,1 l
}
! !hii!
l-I I
' 90 l d;. rih l b ),! Y' I W {.p S '5 Jb,.~
?
l Ii
_I 1!
I I l_,_i i
I I
I L.L ! e i I
i li
,$hi,.e.3.
i f/ 1, A..i.,A I,_i_ '
L l lf' ), 9 i I
i
? -- k' d 4 ',4r d. j. 2. E!'M l 0 Ma - I I
i' i
! l' I j
i i
l I
- 'l I
i
- 1. I (I
I I
i l
l I
I I
i i
i i
! i A. 4L l 1.-_.;.,iMe V,'e,-.!./ !J A A i
__i i
il I
i l
/;
i j,.
i:
l I
i
!,, l i
i l
i l
.)
l/.
i c4A4tA h k 'l.'!J W.0 ) ~~~' h k--' -b t
- O/7U'* M I
/
!, V44
^
- ; 'K6.!.i < U i -,mi 1.4-C
- -f ' E E O N @ '
I
!. Am
/> 'J K'J 9: / i i!
I I
l/ l E l// i I
'/p,,i
~
i i,
l i
i i
l i
I ir > i i
l i
T #f
.JG,..' L h... % i-?. i ' fu,-l -
c.-io'w /--
I
- x% ;,) i:
<.45;A
+2.4-L X
&;:kLM
'/
\\
! M _, Ls'2,'-12 -- ' / L z A r'--
I -74, a e'2/An Jf ' *J L !2r h i J/ ara ki d.
'AAlc / A -
i' c,--h, f st4?,JJ,'4;-#i -C~~
, JiJ.-
? ' f/C &
Y
/.r 9.b..i-D,.
. A m, /. t. s, -
./
,. ' W /.
v ?.; ~ u p.
(;d-~ 8 L'-,. 'J
! } L Mi Ld?r 6 i --- 2%i, /I ?? LJS-d' I
s-L. n
%E ';-dJ"- Ml ' ~ ' h X G < .-E ;., ~-i !
'i i
i i
!#1 i
i i
i
- ,I i
/
i/Fie.
~
~
i 1
% Pl/V~ f);O '
- W.i2. d A= D /'A'C (
& -),
! S R. v ',.,c; si' 'cl.,m,,- m A !
! ---A-1/?s.O ; 44.0_ -A '-
i
/ j.o. -c1 : -r n J f i Y~ C. i d>Uf i/ ; --'
. m.L 'L r 6 e v_.2_,j _..
l l
l l
l i
i
( !
t i
l I b - lt i eYh //,-.. :,,!
L-'s., b E [d.Al ~ - S i 0 k ' - N d 4 -
,,-Ofi-L '- + ei... ; -
i Ws =,P 40 'w7 '
'Ai-
-,n j,'_.
' i e'l /J...i : !_. t i iMr <> 0'6d ' '.:_i 's.A 2 6-
,i e
i, 4l,, '
e'.', i,.A i 4 J
_ - L- ! Q.. i ?
i k f2'=- !
).' !l
- ., /; '. - -;>, i. A ;
L.d),. A ~ :
i i
i i
]'/C
! ~ " ;
i 8
g t
i i
i-i i
,i.W 5 /,
i t
t i i i
I i
i t
/-
r i
l I
I i
i I
l I
i I
i j
i i
i i
I P D 00966 4
i i
l l
I i
i i
i i
i i
! l
'l AGENDA Diablo Canyon Consultants Upda e tieeting March 21, 1978 - Rm. 1145, 245 Market - 8:30 A.M.-
l.
Introduction - (RVB) 2.
Current Statue of Licensing a.
Schedule (JSH) b.
NRC/ACRS issues G Structural / Equipment response (VJG) 6>GroundMotionParameters((OCl)
@ Probabilistic studies j
r
/
e
- ~c"A b'" ef *U O!V*
- SRP Prog & N(e?"ss&a iHJH) -Is
-IVbe USC= ~W ccj"'!!x ? tYi us.*
<n 3.
ram a-v c vrr-en 4.
Consultants Reports 'on State-cf-art developments b
7 y,5
- a.
Geology j
b.
Seist:: ology 6gF g o
c.
Soil-Structure Interaction e
p,ty[peYe d.
Structural Dynamics
';jw s.r:
k 5.
Futiure Strategy (MHF, JBH, RVB) p s M-a.
c.o-,, m,se E' b"*'"
S.
p
.~s -
f, 0" "
a.
NRC/ACRS Concerns M, E' -
40 6 b.
Public hearings P
c.
Operation Dkor-;
I.
/
& se y. & [r4 /:'
r I~ AWi*
"*1'L ~y }LHu~. ~ M -
dk
,=.
7~;in' 4
04,s..,,.:
Ves
-2 ho,,/
3
.g, %y a/,;m s
,.g 5.a r, 3 e.
i y s s;h;,3 m e - as3 $ ;/a n.
m r!
./
$ Y ML U ' h A D ^*d wHi c H cc: Attendees 0 HO.S G R/ ~N!,0 'Sti/ 0.l.05.C#f'ISI Ti LEM { @(E) Dacooptihit.
D+t1 P r/4
(
?ol /}.a'. 0E.Y.*lE-
,;,d P.D 00964
..- s
.p
- c.-sd.n 3-2 7-/b'
.- 82/# du -y
.l pd5-/ A
~
~
ma E Mu - a-4 a
-fM L
J M r L M -
//o n
~
~
birr
< 7' A.
/
6/~~
^, d hdw -
fn.
n
/
-e; h _-[- n
}
h hj _ f,__
/2444
,. 4
_ __,d. Q, pM Y g 8. (N d.
z..
-J'._/fZ7 e ~~~~2-s
~$_ph-S(.z:nrYl b 'S
-IXJed CVT>
Ar. ' ; fx 5 nx.10!
-zt; ns1-m, f
L 19 ; a cAJ
~ n +- A 0o r
/.Det$ S/>>,
~0s$0D.tv 8 J /du sr h kAuf h
6 hd~ a. $w Wh
.{
-> L
- 2.. ! n i:,
~
/
Yw._
31w...k_.bw&&n. $-
ic I
c-4 A I.._.6 'O d w / j fk Zbbe:s:#
=
~
(s oh
- 0. 9 s
< 59~I
~~~
n e-
.n NE $w
.. 'b z A2
~1. p_. tog c o -
8 n-n a c?w&_4
/ ffr_zf). &,c ~.0vk%d
~
w
.2Y*-Q n. J~/ s ~f g -
n P-D-06963---
' o e. G d -- M a e
s ze-, e ba
- rz 2,f.niahhg-dspol, c./f Skyp,
~
s 4n,L e n # a;r
. ~e,.li C n E E f -
A z G n e e d )
m_., w e
m.
' ~ ~
o J bx n_ _, _ J '--
El y,)&
M&, &d 3.% 4:?
2,i ma a
/
l h
. (.
3-e.9_hr/ M _4 p d %agn!
L~
~
Q.. YM!SE
~
!g4
~
. nu<w'y
. c...p.r!dATyanA--
G f &..
u A
Y ue W
_Cenn,>/ A
/&z.
A ~ L A A.4-7l' a.;r e
??os MxRJ '
"o M Li S
ill A
('
x l IhWYY NN-
-t w
n - u f-J f c R s.,La n" a.-.s' y a m
P D OGSS2 3
8-Od n.Y /
hy&..'s- ['M l-
/*
(
r
?
.. /.. i
/-
.b(.cJd o Ccth yo w CO wr u.M qput Q 4 % g g.,g',o
. P 6 $ E:
3 - 2. I ~ 7 &
5 N CI. M t Regrewh4 e
((,[ d S'
k l 5 W 4 A.
.. __.__. _. _uR.c ap_,,_g._3/,.,algc..
1
' Ch.Cvndl... ___
seV1 g _ _.._....
,. b r. K J M f / s mn u_.. -..
y, _.=_-
y
$.. bfliE.. futuu W.
p.Taa.
, Enkh kb/Aek AG lE.
' ALMi~
/ c.+c
. R 7Dtd C.lu M Y R q. +E.
(
t 1
i I
i 1
l l
f l
1 l
l
........w.!
y,e
,. j
- i. -
! M c M o S.a x y c w._.._ 9 h r + % W h _.(A p d 4 M.. c h,
--..P.6 f e
-. - > -. 2 ~ 7 i ~ 7 2 IVant.
Reyee ~M%
i i H. 'J. & 4,p.c c P6. ! s-i Ots.ks.unmv P6it.
af][S2Lu
~
^
Y.
1+- ': -s
/4
- d. c.g..
.:%kn %. %,ei
./2&E 4 QJ-_
s/
it 2
/.
c
. AL:.cc n f, '4. -.
d %. R, a s w y..
Cc=s.
a-I N
'+
f.
I aAc/m,%r r.~m Mwac.
Tbm&ck L~ e CGez AK-v EE V N t ra w wr w
.._YW d.!- Y;?6
.... -. k & f-E Ul23 h/Vke S kaSri br.EI h) $ $ ~
-....-...._8v$$$e dwc.
... & o_.
W LfC.-. &- W.
' M -.> je:.nu c-O: C _. l? ml. G,...,
=._....._.___.;,.
1._
UA. C...
%.~&~- Nur
? G.s 2.-.
... ~
' G.}/fi.h&.
P D 00.S65
....G dW
/
/
7' T _Na v Tr
?LS. / 4__. _.
i e v4Y'.
.