ML20024H574
| ML20024H574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 05/17/1991 |
| From: | Edgeworth P NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Lofy R PARAMETER, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024H571 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-L-1342, CON-FIN-L-1342-0, CON-NRC-03-89-027, CON-NRC-3-89-27 NUDOCS 9106050064 | |
| Download: ML20024H574 (5) | |
Text
-
l pet Rf Cy4>
UNITED STATES
! '^
L. P
- n
,E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{.
o,
[
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20%$
y
<,, ' 'u.?
'...+
MAY 171991 Parameter, Inc.
ATIN:
Richard A. Lofy 13380 Watertown Plank Road Elm Grove, Wisconsin 53122
Dear Mr. Lofy:
Subject:
Task Order No. 18 Under Contract No. NRC-03-89-027 Entitled
" Modification Design Inspection - Palisades" (L-1342)
This letter confirms verbal authorization provided to Lou Albers by Brenda DuBose, of my staff, on May 17, 1991, to commence work on the subject Task Order effective May 20, 1991, with an established ceiling of $22,726.67.
In accordance with Section G.6, Task Order Procedures, of the subject contract, this letter definitires Task Order No. 18.
This effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and Parameter Inc.'s technical proposal dated May 16, 1991, incorporated herein by reference.
The period of performance for Task Order No. 18 is May 20, 1991 through July 12,1991.
The total cost ceiling is $22,726,67.
The amount of
$22,197.80 represents the total reimbursable costs, the amount of $13.88 represents the facilities capital cost of money, and the amount of $514.99 represents the fixed fee.
Accounting data for Task Order No. 18 is as follows:
B&R No.:
020-19-14-02-0 FIN No.-
L-1342-0 Appropiation No.-
31X0200.200 Obligated Amount:
$22,726.67 (This amount has been obligated under the basic contract.)
The following individuals are considered by the Government to be essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder:
A. DuBouchet 9106050064 910523 PDR CONTR NRC-03-89-027 PDR
Richard A, Lofy NRC-03-89-027 Task Order No. 18 Page 2 of 2 The contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under this task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.1 -
Key Personnel.
Ti.e issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or conditions of the subject contract.
Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
Te.hnical Matters:
Brian F. Thomas, Project Officer (301) 492-1210 Contractual Matters:
Brenda J. DuBose, Contract Adrainistrator (301) 492-7442 Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by naving an official, authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contract Administrator.
You should retain the third copy for your records.
Sincerely,
^$Y l
yd 117L
' Paul J. Edgeworth, Contracting Of ficer) b Contract Administration Branch No, 1 g Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated k rder ACCEPT NAME
(/ j TITLE S 3 9f DATE
_m
[0d NV 01: 11 I f> ~C I 'G D I
(
Contract NRC-03-89-027 Parameter ATATEMENT_OF WORK TASK ORDER 018 TITLE:
Modification Design Inspection - Palisades DOCKET NUMBER: 50-255
.c B&R NUMBER:
120-19-14-02 FIN No.
L-1342 NRC TEAM LEADER:
Jay Ball NRC PROJECT MANAGERt Brian E. Thomas, (PTS 492-1210)
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE May 20, 1991 to June 28, 1991 AAG2RQHD Recont problems have been identified during a steam generator replacement inspection (1990/1991) with engineering design and analysis work related to piping and pipe supports.
Specific concerns were raised about inadoquato design verification measures, questionable design assumptions, and inadequate corrective actions.
Region III requested that NRR perform an independent inspoction to assist in establishing the technical significanco of these recent des! Jn control findings.in the piping analysis area.
Concerna reg rding programmatic weakness in the design control program were previously identified by an Enginocring Team Inspection (1989/89-
- 07) and snubber reduction inspection (1989/89-24).
Region III will conduct an inspection of the design activities at the Palisados Plant.
The inspection team will evaluate the adequacy of design-activities associated with recent plant modifications.
To-accomplish this, Region III noods to nupplemont its staff with one piping analysis engineer.
OBJECTIVE The objective of -this task ~ order is to obtain export technical assistance (one' piping analysis ongineer) to assist the NRC inspection team in the performance of the subject inspection.
voRK REQUIREMENT _B The contractor shall furnish the qualified specialist and - the necessary facilities, materials and services to assist the NRC in preparing for and conducting inspection -activities and findings.
The engineer should have extensive experience in design -and analysis of piping and mechanical systems, including, but not limited to, indupth familiarity with US design practicos, NRC inspection techniques, and standard US industry practices associated with nuclear plant modifications (see attachment B for detailed personnel requiremento).
l
't0J MV 01til 16 T I '6 0
(
(
LtvEL OF_
BUBTABX8 EFFORT
- CNEDULED COMPLETIO_N 1.
conduct on-site 5 days May 20-24, 1991 inspection pre--
paration in g
accordance with NRC inspection procedure 93803
" Safety System outage Modifica-tion Inspection,"
Section 2.02 (Attachment A).
2.
Conduct in-office 5 days June 3-7, 1991 inspection pre-paration by re-reviewing per-tinent background documentation and material to ba
-provided by the Toan Leader.
3.
Prepare input to inspection report.
a.
Summarize 10 daya June 10-14 and findings June 17-21, 1991 daily and prior to the exit interview b.
Prepare 5 days June 24-28, 1991 final
-inspection report documentation at the NRC Headquarters office in Maryland.
REPORTING REOUIREMENTS The contractor specialist vill prepare in draft and final form, input to the inspection report documenting any issuon and findings in accordance with the work requirements of this task.
k
90J.MV 01: 11 16~tt'Go
(
4 LEVEL OF EPFORT AND PERIOD OF PERFAluGdCZ The total lovel of effort for one engineer la approximately 25 professional staff days.
The duration la as indicated above.
Project management effort is estimated at 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br />.
Support staff effort is estimated at 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
MEETINGS AND TRAVEL one, one-person, five day trip, to the plant site, to conduct on-site preparatory activities for the subject inspection.
One, one person, two week trip to the palisades plant site to assist the NRC in conducting the subject inspections during the Week of June 10-14 and June 17-21, 1991.
One, one-person trip to NRC Rockville, MD offico to assist the NRC in the documentation of-inspection activities.
It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assign technical
- staff, employeon, and subcontractors who have the required educational background, experience, or combination thereof, to moet both the tochnical and regulatory objectives of the work specified in thia SOW.
The NRC vill rely en representation cade by the contractor concerning the qualificationa of the personnel proposed for assignment to thin task order including assurance that all information contained in the technical
.and disclosures, posals, including resumes and conflict of interest cost pro is accurate and truthful.
NRC FURNISHND MATERIAL Documents required to prepare for the subject inspection vill be provided by the NRC Team Leador, I
\\