ML20024H112
| ML20024H112 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1991 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024H111 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-91-07, 50-334-91-7, NUDOCS 9105210448 | |
| Download: ML20024H112 (3) | |
Text
,-
- ~
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Portland General Electric Company Docket No. 50-344 TrojanNuclearPlant License No. NPF-1 During an NRC inspection conducted from February 10 through March 31,ith the
- 1991, four violations of NRC requirements were identified.
In accordance w
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violations are listed below:
A.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part:
Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities referenced below:
a.
The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1971.
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Part 1 states in part:
" Maintenance which can affect the performance of safety related equipment should be properly preplanned and performed in accordance with written documented instructions, or drawings appropriate to the circumstances."
Administrative procedure (AO) 3-9, " Maintenance Request," Revision 3.5, provides instructions on how to preplan maintenance.
A0 3-9 states the job analyst is required to " assess the reported condition (job task) and develop work instructions with sufficient detail to enable qualified individuals to perform the specified actions without direct supervision.
IF during the performance of job assessment activities, permanent plant Eiuipment/ components are found NOT to be properly identif;cd, Tication ThtN initiate immediate action to ensure the installation of identi BEFORE the requested work / maintenance is performed."
1.
Contrary to the above, prior to February 12, 1991, ajobanalyst found permanent plant equipment not properly identified and did not-initiate immediate action to ensure maintenance was not performed.
The maintenance was performed on February 12, 1991, per MR 90-12401 and resulted in a plant trip.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
2.
Contrary to the above, on February 12, 1991, because of improper planning, Maintenance Request 90-12401 did not require identification of jumper termination points and as a result an electrical jumper was incorrectly landed which resulted ir, a plant trip.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
L l
l 9.105220440 910429 hDR ADOCK 0300o344 PDR l
l
2 B.
Technical Specification 6.8.1 states in part:
Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities referenced below:
c.
Surveillance and test activities of safety related equipment.
MaintenanceProcedure(MP)2-0,"InstalledPlantInstrumentation,"
describes the calibration surveillance activities on installed instrumentation.
Step 6.1.1.c of MP 2-0 states in part that, "The calibration due date for equipment covered by or meeting technical specification requirements (safety related) may be extended by a factor of 1.25 times the calibration interval."
Technical specification surveillance reqeirement 5.8.1.1.2.a.1 (diesel fuel oil day tank level) and 4.8.1.1.2.a.2 (diesel fuel oil storage tank level) are verified from indications received from Level Transmitters (LTs) 4900A and 4904A respectively.
LT 4900A and 4904A are on a two year calibration frequency.
Contrary to the above, as of March 31, 1991, Level Transmitters 4900A and 4904A had not been calibrated since August 22 and 23, 1988 respectively.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
C.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," states in part that " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected...
The identification of the significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrective actions taken shall be documented..."
Contrary to the above, documentation of the issuance and installation of an incorrect seal ring for CV-1452 on February 15, 1991 was not performed until February 22, 1991.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Portland General Electric Company is hereby required to-submit a written statement of-explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region V, and a copy to the NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Trojan, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a
" Reply to a Notice-of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be 1
1
r 3
4 proper should not be taken.
Consideration may be given to extending the response _ time for good cause shown.
Dated at Walnut Creek, California this 21*-day of April,1991 i
l L
l' L
l 1
{
t i
l l
l' l
- -