ML20024G860

Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-22,consisting of Amended Change Request 2

ML20024G860
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	10/15/1971
From:	Ward E NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To:	Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20024G861	List: ML20024G860 ML20024G862 ML20024G863 ML20024G864 ML20024G865
References
NUDOCS 9105010220
Download: ML20024G860 (3)

Text

-.. _

I, O'

0

{& a &&

I usn=

I NORTHERN STATES POWER COMrANY MINN E Apou s, uiNNu nou se4oi October 15, 1971 4

5g l

.~,~~ %, c'.,,

k ~ %' 'Q*I,Q rj

'e Q q

at Dr Peter A Morris, Director

'.A Division of Reactor Licensing U S Atomic Energy Comission

[

A '4A # Ut j

Washington, DC 20545 LRegulatory File Cy.

s.

/

w/

s

..h/

Dear Dr Morris:

'm, -~

MONTICELLO ICCLEAR GENERATING PLANT E-5979 Amendment Change Request No. 2 Attached are three signed originals and nineteen conformed copies of Amended Change Request No. 2, to the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Operating License No. DPR-22.

Under separate cover, we are sending you 40 copies of the following technical Sfcrmation:

(1) Ansvars to questions conveyed with Dr Morris' letter of June 3, 1971.

(2) Updated issue (October 1, 1971) of Gaseous Radwaste System Modification Report originally submitted with Chango Request No. 2.

(3) Report M0G-DR-2 (Rev C) covering Operating Concepts for the modified off-gas syster The technical information described above was furnished to the plant Operations Committee and to the Safety Audit Committee for review and recommendations.

The Operations Committee has reviewed and found satisfactory the above described technical inforcation. Formal action on the catter by the Safety Audit Co=mittee w

will be taken at its October 27-28 meeting. We will advice you of the action

,tf taken by the Safety Audit Co=mittee.

Section 50.59 (a) of AEC regulations requires prior comission approvsl of changes in the Technical Specifications or of changes involving unroviewed safety questions. We applied for commission authorization pursuant to Section 50.59 (d) because of the resultant changes necessary to the Technical

/

Specifications.

The proposed changes to the radwaste system may constitute an unreviewed safety question, as that ter= is defined in Section 50.59 (c).

However, we believe the safety analysis included in our Modification Report 9N o

y c-

$W"

!$@0 Q

!PD t

C DCT201971 s.["

e

'W Ef%er i

91ososoaao 711ois

%;fcg p s C

g.

PDR ADOCK 05000263 p

f

~-

P PDR

.R

.a

r

,m NO RN GTATEO POWER CO NY i

Tr.

. ld' r::

y-

.y

~.

?%:

2 t.

pp~

supports our conclusion that the proposed changes do not p esent significant

r

• - bazards considerations not described or implicit in the Final Safety Analysis

' r_ Report.

pn Yours very truly, Y

S$l. 0214 1.-"

E C Ward, Director j,

Engineering Vice Presidential Staff I

i 1

Attachments o

l

+

,,y, '

i

'p.sL J.

a)

> g'4

)

fy zl' '

., + -

d.

st #

kh

• 1(? ~

+*.,

3

.&4

'?

Im (i

.q.,

g 4

(d<ff '

p-i.ei.

~ ~ '

~

~ ^ ~ ' ~ ~ ~

.E...

l_--

vn.- - - -.

g,, y y (-

u, an p, isn 1

.w>as 2 EMB.

u n.

u tua quos a

'g-x1, omsa; jm o w.a cc of >. m

? Or. Peter A. aIneria 1

ACTION NICtl&&RT ho oCTION k(C(51 ART ![.

CONCURRENCE h

DATE ANSWERED.

COMMENT O

ev:

CLAh&sp; PQ6T opt eCE F 4LE CGOC W

50-263

.r No.

h.,uoN.w.nia.u i

Ltr trane h e g ia....W

.craruo vo o v.

uCemo,7 c,. T.

!l Enesth 10-E-71 k wft cys for ACTIm

'l

,1 f

erICNr M " O asquest #2-amgeest for

% Fil* C7 a-ABC N l

aeth of asedifismer s ce h mader=

+

Systaan for Lic. EPR-22 metarland 14-15 8sCM"N 71 costsiming amnasen es gunstimas re wh (21 r

>,. i, - i e of -.

a. rri e. ma.

medenste 1.systaus modiff.emei== apt 6 eh--holt g-. j ( g C.).co.ve.rlag ope eencepts for W. W

. e

=....

.. r

% }gg

"'"^""*' (3 Orig & 19 coni'd cys 6% d) Seyd gggg o 40 cys att hmt's rec'd)

""h 'I "" i RBIC CB=eh=)

,a 4.i '...

3g, u.s. Arouic cucnor couusssim M AIL CONTROL FORM coaw arc nos e u.s. Go v s at.us N T pais tiNo or ric s teri m 4.ees

'W8

-