ML20024G751

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 721221 Request for Supplemental Info Re Util 720901 Tech Spec Change Request
ML20024G751
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/18/1973
From: Mayer L
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To: Ziemann D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9104290329
Download: ML20024G751 (2)


Text

. _ _.._ -_-

l gy i '

p Mhg Regu!r. tory Ello Cy, A

j.

NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY l

tAinneapolis, f/innesota 55401

.3

^i ' ',

January 18, 1973

//

..,7

!7 tid fi n,

(( ii1, 's p,

x f/r. D L Ziemann, Chief

(..9I.

,,4 @

I - [.p $ 3 1

Operating Reactors Branch #2 v._ f.

4 G

.y N

.j Di rectorate of Licensing sa

$ ~k Q 3 -

fd 6

~

]

United States Atomic EnerCy Commicsion Washington, D C 20545 i

l

Dear Vr. Ziemann:

M*)8' f.DilTICELLO IJELEAR GEtERAlliti PL AfJT Docket tb. 50-263 Li cence ib. DPR-22 Pequest for Supplemental Information on Technical Speci fication Change Reg;est Dated September 1,1972 Your letter of December 21, 1972, requested supplemental informat ion wi thin 33 days on the f.bnticello Technical Speci fication Change Requect dated Septomber 1,1972 (Supplement Ib.1 to Chance Reques t tb. 3).

The portion of the Cham e Recpest dealing with the rod drop accident analysic was based on General Electric topical report TED010527.

We have determined that General Electric will iccue another topical report on this subject in early February.

Uce of this report will enable uc to provide information which is more responsive to your request.

particularly for the core as constituted subsequent to our flarch-Apri;, 1973 refuelinf outare.

'hu W i th the e xi s t i ng '.b nt i cel l o co re, current plant operating conditions and our present operating practices, the consequences of the unlikely rod drop accident would be significantly loss severe than those analyzed in the referenced topical

" ^ "

report and in the '/enticello FSAR.

Based on the above information, we believa that a timo extension for our reply is appropriate.

This was discussed by telephone with your organi:stion and was deemed acceptable.

No expect to have our response completed by March 1,1973.

7 Yours very truly, D.

h,0U.ayer gkrector of tbclear Support Services S M ik i

Tkt

B H Grier
  • G Charnoff l

[inhesota Pollution Control Acency

.o. AT T fh Ken Druoan

~

.r 0 +,

3 9104290329 730118 O

PDR ADOCK 05000263

.f jf P

PDR

..r,,ym p:

AEC DI'*TRIFI2IC;; 70n tar.? 50 pnCCT MAmIAL

-v 1

j _~

('A'i.;Tod.iif 70M)

(

C0;;30;, t'o 507

~~

~.

/

~

l

/

Flit D/G; OF 110U:

DAL RLC'a L'2.t l'.o;g RPr c un Pd'.)A liorLhern 508t*8 Y W'T '

  • I Minn:: Polis, Minn.

55401 L.O. Hayer 1-18-73 1-22-73 X

W:

Oil 10 00 v2.La in;u /a.c FLa f.

1 signed 39 I

--- I E l'OCAL Nh

.Mr. D.L. Ziemayn LihW i'0 GE" %G ' d DaG;As ss&t

'C M S3:

Q Vit W liit U 40 50-263 DEsCaIPflo;is Ltr re our Az u Acr....

3;;gy,ggg;;g; furnishing suppi info to Tech Specs Change req ro 9-1-72 itr for the Monticello Plant....

p q...,--.....,

U U. s U $ s. i.....) J i.

Monticello Plant l

pg,.g g g 3 i

/G ; /.C'h !.7 /.. n. Ju ' v:.

DL l-22-73 E'JfLO(L)

EC;;lSi;"TJs(L)

SCiLTCL(L)

YJi1CITJs;;U')

W/ Ccpico W/ Copico

. }!/ Lgias W/ Copiers CLAN;(L) f%LL(L)

VZ,ID' J:::( L)

Y0tT.;3EIf 0L(S)

'1/ Ccpico U/ Ccpico V/ Ccrics U/ Ccpica COIJ2:L(L)

VALS/Jl/](L)

C TCCD(E4)

.72,AU(2 )

U/ Ccpico U/ Copics U/ Canlo' il/ Ccpico KNIEp(~,)

H. DEL';rN DICLLc.$)

y/ cagc a al e-w e s, s'I c.-a--

or n-1 i

1 I

i i

i l

t i

' b

-