ML20024F126
| ML20024F126 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1983 |
| From: | NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024F120 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8309080247 | |
| Download: ML20024F126 (367) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:' 1 Docket No. 50-336 Environmental Qualification of Safety Related Electrical Equipment Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Unit No. 2 August 18,1983 8309080247 830810 PDR ADOCK 05000 P s
Gersral Offices
- Seldon Street, Berlin Connecticut
'******"*'**""""" P.O. BOX 270 q
72"ZU7""
.cr. w uru,43m ca w on H ARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 (203) 666-6911 g A .e., a au .a,-
August 18,1983 Docket No. 50-336 A03174 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
References:
(1) W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, dated May 20,1983. (2) R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil, dated April 6,1983. (3) W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark, dated April 25,1983. Millstone Unit No. 2 Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment May 20,1983 Response to 10 CFR 50.49, Supplemental Information The most recent NRC requirements on the issue of environmental qualification of electric equipment were promulgated as 10CFR50.49, which became effective on February 22, 1983. Among its provisions was the requirement to provide a submittal on or before May 20, 1983, identifying the equipment to be qualified within the scope of the rule and the schedule for achieving full qualification. This information was provided to the Staff in Reference (1). Due to the then relatively recent receipt (April 11, 1983) of the Millstone Unit No. 2 SER and corresponding Technical Evaluation Report (TER) via Reference (2), inadequate time had elapsed to complete the equivalent of the "90-day SER response" at the time of cur Reference (1) transmittal. This document is therefore being submitted to fulfill the SER response requirement by responding to the questions raised by the Franklin Research Center (FRC) in Reference (2). Since our methods for identifying equipment pursuant to 10CFR50.49(b)(2), our interpretation of 10CFR50.49(b)(3), and a description of our preventative maintenance program were provided in Reference (1), these matters will not be reiterated in this submittal. Additionally, the Reference (2) concern regarding verification that the containment spray system is not subjected to disabling single-component failure was addressed in Reference (3). As such, we consider this issue resolved. Because of the volume of information being transmitted in this submittal, NNECO has adopted the following format of Attachments to facilitate the assimilation of this material.
%$e
,.e
Attachment 1: Chronology and References for Environmental i Qualification of Electrical Equipment, Millstone Unit No.2. Attachment 2: List of Electric Equipment Important to Safety Requiring Qualification. Attachment 3: Index to SCEW Sheet Package. Attachment 4: System Component Evaluation Work Sheets, Discrepant Equipment Summary Sheets (Including Justifications for Continued Operation), and SER/TER Review Sheets. i The Attachment 4 sets of SCEW sheets additionally identify qualification references for your use. We trust the information supplied here satisfies the concerns of Reference (1)in accordance with the Final Rule on Environmental Qualification of Electrical i Equipment,10 CFR 50.49. Based on this submittal, we consider all open items I regarding this issue resolved, recognizing that equipment upgrades identified in ' this submittel must be completed in accordance with the schedule contained in 50.49(g). i ( Very truly yours, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY
- 8 '
W. G. Counsil ' Senior Vice President
- Attachments i
{
1 l Docket No. 50-336 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Unit No. 2 Attachment 1 Chronology and References August 13,1983
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MILLSTONE UNIT NO. 2 CHRONOLOGY AND REFERENCES
?
(1) February 8, 1979 ...... B. H. Grier letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting I&E Bulletin No. 79-01. (2) March 23, 1979 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid identifying unqualified SMLS. (3) April 6, 1979 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid identifying qualified SMLS to be installed prior to Cycle 3 startup. (4) April 18, 1979 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid identifying unqualified solenoid operating valves will have qualified solenoids by Cycle 3 startup. (5) May 8, 1979 ........... W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid identifying SMLS on Valves S1-G14, G24, 034, and G44 will not be replaced; justification provided. (6) June 6, 1979 .......... B. H. Grier letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting I&E Bulletin No. 79-01A, regarding ASCO solenoid valves. (7) June 6, 1979 .......... W. G. Counsil letter to N. C. Mosely transmitting response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01. (8) September 4, 1979 ..... W. G. Counsil letter to N. C. Mosely transmitting additional information in response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01, June 6, 1979 letter. - (9) September 5, 1979 ..... W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid identifying unqualified RTS's in containment - continued operation - justified. ' (10) September 19, 1979 .... W. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Reid submitting followup report on September 5, 1979 letter. (11) January 9, 1980 ....... W. G. Counsil letter to B. H. Grier transmitting response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-28/ Defective Gaskets in NAMCO SMLS. e'
I i Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Millstone Unit No. 2 Page 2 - (12) January 14, 1980 ...... B. H. Grier letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B. (13) January 18, 1980 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to N. C. Mosely transmitting update to original I&E Bulletin No. 79-01 response -additional information. (14) February 29, 1980 ..... B. H. Grier letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting Supplement to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B. (15) March 3, 1980 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to B. H. Grier transmitting response to Items 1 - 3 to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B. (16) March 31, 1980 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to B. H. Grier transmitting update to March 3, 1980 letter, Items 1 - 3 of I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B. (17) April 17, 1980 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to B. H. Grier transmitting update o f. original response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B, March 3, 1980 letter. (18) May 23, 1980 .......... Commission issues Memorandum and Order requiring SER's by February 1, 1981 and total compliance by June 30, 1982. (19) July 14, 1980 ......... NNECO representatives attend Region I clarification meeting. (20) July 16, 1980 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to B. H. Grier update to original response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B, March 3, 1980 letter, addressing commitments made in the April 17, 1980 letter. (21) August 26, 1980 ....... R. T. Carlson letter to W. G. Counsil discussing audit findings on selected components. (22) August 29, 1980 ....... R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting the Order for Modification of License requiring a response by November 1, 1980. (23) September 10, 1980 .... W. G. Counsil letter to B. Wolfe (GE) requesting expedited response regarding
. qualification documentation.
c Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Millstone Unit No. 1 PJge 3 (24) September 19, 1980 .... D. G. Eisenhut letter to W. G. Counsil ~ transmitting Revised Order for - Modification of License. (25) September 30, 1980 .... NRC issues Supplement 2 to I&E Bulletin No. 79-01B. (26) October 1, 1980 ....... D. G. Eisenhut letter to All Licensees of Operating Plants and Applicants for Operating Licenses and Holders of Construction Permits requesting pertinent information relative to environmental qualification testing. (27) October 9, 1980 ....... W. G. Counsil letter to J. Blachly (Siemans-Allis, Incorporated) requesting expedited response regarding qualification documentation. (28) October 14, 1980 ...... R. T. Carlson letter to W. G. Counsil discussing findings of audit regarding comparison of qualification documentation to plant components. (29) October 20, 1980 ...... NNECO representative responds to request of NRC Project Manager to provide status of the response to the Order. (30) October 24, 1980 ...... B. H. Grier letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting Supplement 3 to I&E Bulletin No. 79-OlB. (31) October 24, 1980 ...... R. A. Clark letter to ' W. G. Counsil transmitting an immediately effective order regarding modifications to the license and Technical Specifications. (32) October 31, 1980 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut providing information, SCEW sheets, and qualification references fulfilling the requirements issued by the Order of Reference (22). (33) November 26, 1980 ..... D. G. Eisenhut letter to W. G. Counsil, Generic Clarification of Documentation required which is associated with Central Qualification file.
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment f Millstone Unit No. 2 P ga 4 (34). December 4, 1980 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to H. R. Denton requesting s hearing on the Order . , issued by Reference (31). (35) January 16, 1981 ...... D. G. Eisenhut letter to W. G. Counsil holding hearing request in abeyance. (36) January 19, 1981 ...... D. G. Eisenhut letter to All Licensees clarifying Bulletin 79-01B requirements. (37) January 20, 1981 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut identifying the lack of planned Environmental Qualification testing. (38) January 30, 1981 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut concurring with 30 day holding of hearing request. (39) January 30, 1981 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut updating October 31, 1980 submittal. (40) March 10, 1981 ........ D. G. Eisenhut to all plants; staff position that summary qualification I reports not adequate. . (41) April 14, 1981 ........ B. H. Grier to W. G. Counsil transmitting Circular 81-06; potential difficiencies in Foxboro transmitters. (42) April 14, 1981 ........ T. M. Novak to W. G. Counsil; 10 day letter requiring justification of continued operation in light of potential difficiencies. (43) April 30, 1981 ........ W. G. Cot nsil to T. M. Novak; providing justification for continued operation in 10-day response. (44) Ma y 2 7 , 19 81 . . . . . . . . . . R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil; transmitting the SER, for review and 90 3 day response. l (45) June 4, 1981 .......... W. G. Counsil to Hendrie requesting l extension of June 30, 1982 deadline. l (46) June 12, 1981 4
......... D. G. Eisenhut to W. G. Counsil allowing 90 days for hearing request after date of issuance of SER. i i
t
. i I
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Millstone Unit No. 2 Ptge 5 (47) June 22, 1981 ......... Industry Petition for extension of deadline for compliance with CLI-80-21. _ (48) June 26, 1981 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, commenting on anticipated usefulness of July 7 - 10 meeting. (49) June 29, 1981 ......... NRC response to industry petitions postponing recommendation until July 31, 1981. (50) July 16, 1981 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to H. R. Denton providing feedback on July 7 - 10 environmental qualification meeting. '(51) July 31, 1981 ......... Staff position to the Commission recommending ' one year extension to the June 30, 1982 deadline. (52) August 14, 1981 ....... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut documenting position on qualification of replacement parts. (53) August 14, 1981 ....... D. G. Eisenhut letter to W. G. Counsil proposing additional, delay on affirmation or withdrawal of pending requests. (54) August 20, 1981 ....... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, accepting Staff proposal of Reference (53) regarding pending hearing requests. (55) August 26, 1981 ....... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, discussing status of SER responses and providing overview of NNECO perspective on environmental qualification. (56) August 26, 1981 ....... W. G. Counsil to D. G. Eisenhut submitting the 90-day response to the 7 Staff's SER. (57) August 27, 1981 ....-.. I & E Information Notice 81-29 regarding adverse test results. (58) September 30, 1981 .... W. G. Counsil to D. G. Eisenhut providing minor editorial changes to Reference (56). Y
Environmental Qualification of Eltetrical Equipment Millstone Unit No. 2 Paga 6 t (59) December 8, 1981 ...... W. G. Counsil to R. C. Haynes, I fulfilling commitments made in Reference (55) regarding resistance temperature detectors. (60) January 6, 1982 ....... R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil requesting that additional information be provided to FRC. (61) January 20, 1982 ...... Federal Register notice (47FR2876) on a proposed rule regarding Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment. (62) February 9, 1982 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. M. Crutchfield and R. A. Clark forwarding material requested in Reference (60). (63) February 10, 1982 ..... W. G. Counsil letter to the Secretary of the Commission providing schedular comments on the proposed rule of Reference (61). (64) February 18, 1982 ..... R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil requesting submittal of certain I
, reference information.
(65) February 22, 1982 ..... 47FR7782: Proposed Revision I to Reg. Guide 1.89: Environmental Qualfication of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants. (66) March 4, 1982 ......... R. C. Haynes letter to all licensees transmitting Information Notice 82-03: i
" Environmental Tests of Electrical Terminal Blocks."
(67) -March 22, 1982 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to Secretary of the Commission commenting on the Proposed revision to Reg. Guide 1.89. (68) May 13, 1982 .......... W. G. Counsil letter to R. C. DeYoung providing notification of a Substantial Safety Hazard. l' l
-(69) June 30, 1982 ......... Federal Register Notice (28363) l suspending the June 30 deadline for !
completion of Environmental Qualification ! of Safety Related i Electrical Equipmer.t by all operating nuclear _ power plants. 1 - l I
I Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Mi'.lstone Unit No. 2 Page 7 (70) July 1, 1982 ........... W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark submitt,ing qualification information - requested in Reference (64). ' (71) July 12, 1982 .......... C. J. Crane (Franklin Research Center)
, letter to NRC stating that Millstone Unit No. 2 has provided (via Reference 70)) the information requested by Reference (64).
(72) December 29, 1982 ...... W. G. Counsil to R. A. Clark updating information on TMI Item II.F.1.5. (73) January, 1983 .......... Union of Concerned Scientists (Petitioner) vs NRC and the USA (Respondents), and NUGEQ (Intervenor), Brief for Respondents on Petition for Review of a Final Rule on the NRC. (74) January 21, 1983 ....... Federal Register, 48FR2729 issuing final rule on Environmental Qualification. (75) February 18, 1983....... Union of Concerned Scientists (Petitioner) vs NRC, et. al. (Respondent), NUGEQ (Intervenor), Petition for Review of a Rule of the NRC, Brief for Intervenor Nuclear Utility Group on Equipment Qualification. (76) February 22, 1983 ...... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut confirming date by which a determination must be made on a hearing request. (77) March 7, 1983........... NUGEQ (Petitioner) vs NRC (Respondent), Petition for Review.
~
(78) March 18, 1983 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark and D. M. Crutchfield formally advising the Staff of NU's interpretation of the Final _ Rule on Environmental Qualification. (79) March 24, 1983 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut conditionally withdrawing NU's request for a hearing.
., 7 Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Millstone Unit No. 2 Page 8 (80) March 28, 1983 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark and D. M. Crutchfield reestablishing a submittal date for certain qualification information.
(81) April 6, 1983 ...... R. A. Clark letter to W. G. Counsil transmitting FRC's Technical Evaluation Report (TER). (82) April 25, 1983 ......... W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark submitting 30-day response to Reference (74). (83) April 15, 1983 ........ W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut submitting NNECO's response to items of Generic Letter 82-33, (Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737). (84) May 18, 1983............ W. G. Counsil letter to R. A. Clark and D. M. Crutchfield, proposing to amend operating license DPR-65 incorporating revised Technical Specifications. (85) May 20, 1983 .......... W. G. Counsil letter to D. G. Eisenhut, providing May 20, 1983 response to 10CFR50.49 (86) June 30, 1983 ......... U. S. Court of Appeals (D. C. Circuit) decision on the Union of Concerned Scientists' petition for review of the Commission's interim regulation suspending the June 30, 1982 EEQ deadline. (87) July 8, 1983 .......... Union of Concerned Scientists' petition before the U. S. Court of Appeals (D. C. Circuit) requesting an expedited briefing schedule for the Reference (86) decision.
A. INTRODUCTION AND CHRONOLOGY Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) was initially requested to address the issue of environmental qualification of electrical equipment for Millstone Unit No. 2 in the form of a docketed response by Reference (1). In accordance with the provisions of Item 4 of Reference (1), References (2) through (5) were submitted to notify the Commission that certain stem . mounted limit switches were lacking the requisite qualification, and identified corrective action and justification for continued operation. By Reference (6), the NRC issued I&E Bulletin No. 79-01A, regarding ASCO solenoid valves. NNECO's initial response to the provisions of Items 1 through 3 of Reference (1) was docketed by Reference (7) and supplemented by Reference (8). References (9) and (10) were submitted in conformance with Item 4 of Reference (1) and discussed the qualification status of resistance temperature detectors used to monitor containment air temperatures. Justification for continued operation was provided. Reference (11) docketed a response to I&E Bulletin No. 79-28 regarding NAMCO stem-mounted limited switches. The issue of environmental qualification was escalated to a higher priority status upon issuance of Reference (12). An indication of the magnitude of this task can be obtained by reviewing the attached chronology. It is important to recognize that NNECO resources have been strained significantly, not cerely because of the amount of equipment requiring qualification documentation, but also because of the numerous changes and conflicts in NRC guidance documents on this subject. To suppont this position, the attached chronology is discussed to specify instances where such conflicts have arisen and to identify the applicability of these reference documents as of this writing. Supplemental information in the form of System Component Evaluation Work Sheets (SCEWS) was provided in Reference (13). For each component, information in the form of component description, description of the accident environment, the environment to which the equipment is qualified, the manner of qualification, and the identification of the specific supporting qualification documentation was provided. Resolution of the issues identified in Reference (6) was also provided by Reference (13). T The first supplement to Reference (1) was issued by Reference (14). The supplemental information was presented in the form of seventeen (17) generic questions and answers. Of particular significance was the response to Question 5, in which the Staff stated that TMI lessons-learned equipment was not to be addressed. The response to Question 9 is also of significance as the Staff states that the requirements and positions in NUREG-0588 are the same as those in NUREG-0578 in relation to
l l i 2 environmental qualification of electrical equipment and components. The response to Question 18 of Reference (25) discusses the differences between NUREG-0588 and NUREG-0578 regarding.the calculation of radiation source terms. By Reference (15), (16), and (17), NNECO responded to the specific provisions of Reference- (12). The equipment , qualification status, which is superseded by the docketing of Appendix II to this report, was presented to the extent it was available at that time. Reference (15) provided information regarding the radiation service conditions and temperature and pressure profiles which remain applicable as shown in Appendix II. In Reference (18), the Commissioners issued the Memorandum and Order, ni required the NRC Staff to issue Safety Eval.tation Reports by February 1, 1981. It is NNECO's intention that the report will be the foundation for a favorable SER. During the regional meetings on this subject (Reference (19), additional changes in NRC requirements or new interpretations were provided. The Staff explained that there was no longer a ; need to adddress areas of the plant which remain at ambient ! conditions. The Staff also discussed the various qualification methods which are acceptable, and these included evaluation, analysis, ar.d similarity considerations. Subsequent to the : meeting, NNECO endeavored to restructure the program to respond ! to the new guidance. ! l By Reference (20), supplemental information to Reference (17) was provided. Commitments made in Reference (17) were fulfilled or new schedules were established. The results of a corporate office audit conducted by the Office of Inspection and Enforcement were documented in Reference (21). No items of noncompliance were identified during the 16-hour verification inspection. , , In Reference (22), the Staff issued the Order for Modification of License and required a response by November 1, 1980. Although eventually superseded by Reference (24), the principle purpose of this report is to respond to Reference (22). 7 NNECO has encountered numerous difficulties in obtaining some of the necessary qualification documentation. Several vendors are i no longer in business supplying components for nuclear l applications, others are no longer in existence, and still , others express great reluctance in providing the requested data. j Postulated reasons include difficulties in retrieval or i In attempting to deal with this commercial considerations. dilemma, NNECO has resorted to letters such as References (23) f
and (27) to expedite receipt of the necessary information. Although such efforts have been helpful, they have not resolved a remaining difficulty in obtaining the required qualification documentation. , In Reference (25), the Staff clarified its position on a number of requirements and escalated the scope of the review effort significantly. NNECO's exceptions and positions with respect to the requirements of this document were discussed in the forwarding letter. NNECO reemphasizes' that extreme difficulties are encountered when the NRC issues documents which revise the scope of a major effort which are required by order to be submitted merely one month from the issuance of Reference (25). By Reference (26), The Staff requested pertinent information regarding environmental qualification tests to be conducted within the next two years. We are endeavoring to supply the requested information, but did not receive this document until Tuesday, October 14, 1980. The current work load on individuals involved in environmental qualification will likely preclude a complete response by November 1, 1980, but NNECO intends to respond as soon as possible. No plans for qualification testing for NNECO have been identified as of this writing. Reference (28) documents the results of a site audit conducted by the Office of Inspection and Enforcement. No items of non-compliance were identified. A response is provided as Appendix III to this report. Reference (29) identifies a call betwen NNECO representatives and the NRC Project Manager for Millstone Unit No. 2 regarding the status of the response to the Order. The questions posed were suggestive of potential for changes / relaxations in certain portions of NRC requirements. The responses provided by NNECO are intended to demonstrate its continued position that the purpose of this effort is to demonstrate the adequacy of the current qualification status of safety-related electrical equipment, which is possible even if certain provisions of the qualification requirements cannot be fulfilled by documentation. By Reference (30), the Staff transmitted Supplement 3 to I&E 7 Bulletin No. 79-018. This document delayed the schedule for submittal of all qualification documentation regarding TMI Action Plan equipment until February 1, 1981. Similarly, the qualification information for equipment required to achieve and maintain a cold shutdcwn condition is not required until February 1, 1981. NNECO's position regarding these changes is being provided now afid will be supplemented by February 1, 1981. By Reference (31), NNECO received an immediately effective Order which modified the license and the Technical Specifications. June 30, 1982 has been established in the license as the date by
I
-4 which fully qualified safety-related electrical equipment must be installed. By December 1, 1980, NNECO must establish complete and auditable records and maintain them at central
~
locations. Steps are being taken to comply with these . requirements on schedule. - By Reference (32) NNECO provided information requested in Reference (24), consisting of qualfication information for safety-related electrical equipment and accordance with the Commission's guidance in this matter. Where total qualification was- not incorporated into this report, justification for continued operation until total conformance could be achieved was provided. In Reference (33), D. G. Eisenhut addressed clarification of the October 24, 1980 Orders to all Licensees. The provision of the Orders requiring centrally located records did not call for creation of any records, per se, but the existance of a system which contained a complete set of documentation on Environmental Qualification. hererence (34) requested that a hearing be held ot determine the validity of NUREG-0588 requirements, specifically the requirement of meeting the June 30,1982 deadline for qualification of all safety-related electrical equipment. Reference (35), D. G. Eisenhut informed W. G. Counsil that the Commission intended to hold the Reference (34) hearing request in abeyance until 30 days after the issuance of the SERs for our facilities, thus, providing the option of reviewing the Safety Evaluations while still preserving our ability to seek a hearing. A response regarding the acceptability of this approach was requested by January 30, 1981. Reference (36), from D. G. Eisenhut to all Licensees, provided information in response to licensee requests regarding certain requirements of Bulletin 79-01B, the Reference (18) memorandum, and the Rcrerence (30) Order. In Reference (37), W. G. Counsil informed D. G. Eisenhut that there are no plans for environmental qualification testing that 7 are applicable to Millstone Unit No. 2. Reference (38) forwarded W. G. Counsil's acceptance or D. G. Eisenhut's proposal to hold our hearing request in abeyance for 30 days following the issuance of the Safety Evaluations for our facilities with the qualification that the 30 days be counted as after the receipt of the last of the Safety Evaluation Reports for the three operating units in the NU System. I Reference (39) updated the Reference (32) submittal, providing updated SCEW sheets, a revised index listing all safety-related electrical equipment, and additional or replacement pages for r
the Master Listing of Electrical Components. This submittal focused on equipment required exclusively to achieve cold shutdown, but did not totally reflect the Staff guidance contained in Reference (36). Reference (40) forwarded D. G. Eisenhut's letter to all licensees, clarifying the NRC Staff requirements for a detailed explanation of test procedures and the results thereof. These detailed reports on Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment would be then considered proprietary. Reference (41) (Circular 81-06) contained information on certain Foxboro 10-to-50 Mil 11 ampere Transmitters. Licensees were advised of the improper use of Teflon wire insulation and an unsuitable capacitor in the amplifier section of these transmitters. In Reference (42), T. M. Novak transmitted the preliminary results of the Staff review of environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in Millstone Unit No. 2. The Staff review resulted in the alleged identification of a number of potential deficiencies such that conformance to DOE guidelines could not be demonstrated. NNECO was required to respond within ten days, providing justification for continued operation in light of these alleged deficiencies. Reference (43), W. G. Counsil provided the required justification for continued operation, pointing out a number of specific concerns with the content of Reference (42). NNECO suggested that the current status of the Staff's SER did not accurately reflect the qualification status of electrical equipment at Millstone Unit No. 2 and that the subject concerns should be evaluated in detail prior to the issuance of the final SER. Reference (44) transmitted the Safety Evaluation Report (SER). The NRC Staff identified the information required, and the actions necessary to comply with Reference (31). NNECO was given the option of presenting alternatives to staff positions, however, all information was requested to be provided within 90 days. NNECO has encountered difficulties in discerning the , bases for the alledged deficiencies in many instances. - In Reference (45), W. G. Counsil informed D. J. Hendrie of the substantial amounts of manpower and resources already expended on environmental qualifications, and that licensee evaluations found the NRC Staff requirements for a June 30, 1982 deadline for full compliance neither appropriate, realistic, nor attainable. NNECO requested relief from the June 30, 1982 deadline, in the form of extensions to a minimum of seventeen i t
-}
J 1 months after SER issuance. Other issues mentioned were equipment in mild- enviornments, replacement parts, . aging l requirements, and containment profiles. This document was subsequently appended to Reference (49). ! J In Reference (46), D. G. Eisenhut informed W. G. Counsil of the - Staff's decision to exterid the 30-day abeyance period granted in Reference (34) to 90 days. Within 90 days or the issuance of the SER for Millstone Unit No. 2, NNECO was requested to infor:n the Staff of its intentions regarding the hearing request of Reference (34), and of the specific issues to be raised in the proceeding. In Reference (47), the law firm of Debevoise and Liberman filed a petition on behalf of 20 licensees seeking a thirteen month extension of the June 30, 1982 deadline established by CLI 21. The petition stated that few, if any, licensees could meet the deadline, and that the assumptions'upon which CLI-80-21 was based have proven to be significantly understated y in terms of ' the length of time needed for compliance. , Reference (48) informed the Staff that NNECO' planned ' to have , representatives present at the July 7 - 310, 1981 meeting on environmental qualification. Based upon speculation regarding the results of the meeting, NNECO also intended to propose' dates for licensee-specific meetings on this issue. Reference (49) informed the 20 petitioning . licensees that the ' NRC Staff intended to postpone its decision on the Reference (47) petition until after the July 7 - 10, 1981 meeting on - environmental qualification. Based upon speculation regarding , the results of the meeting, NNECO also intended -to propose daces for licensee-specific meetings on this issue. Reference (49)' informed the 20 ' petitioning licensees that the NRC Staff intended to postpone its decision on 'the - Reference J (47) petition until after July 7 - 10, 1981 meeting. NNECO had-no objection to this course of action. Reference (50) provided feedback on the July 7 - 10, 1981 - meeting _ on environmental qualification. ' NNECO had a total of _ seven representatives in attendance at this meeting. While the meeting was of some benefit, additional dialogue' on a plant-specific basis was determined to be .necessary to resolve the numberous remaining questions. Specific comments on the meeting were provided as an attachment. General comments regarding resource expenditures adequacy sand correctness of the ,SER, . discrepancies - betwedn the SER and the TER, ' mild environshnts, - and the June 30, 1982 deadline were'also provided.
~
/
g + e--+$eg mmg -9 9-*-T' w %w gS-e g-r- wr-i+* ,- **y w+c-wwYW-t w
}
/
g , et r I In _Ref,erence (51), the NRC Staff responded to the Reference (47) petition, recommending a one-year extension of the deadline to the Commission. Other options were discussed, but a one year extension was recommeded. Additional extensions of time could - be authorized by the Director, Division of Licensing, on a case- ' by-case basis for good cause shown. Reference (52) established a written position on qualification
;of replacement. parts to the provisions of NUREG-0588. NNECO stated that " sound reasons" for use of equipment lacking full
. qualification existed in numerous instances, and that such reasons are documented in the central qualification file. s Reference (53) forwarded D. G. Eisenhut's letter to W. G. Coun,sil proposing an additional delay in the Reference (37) hearing request, to allow NNECO to consider all recent or imminent developments. The staff expressed its intention to continue to pursue resolution of disputed technical issues. In. ' Reference' (54), NNECO concurred. with the Reference (53)
? proposal, . agreeing to inform the Staff of NNECO's decision on
,th'e hearing requ'est within 30 days of Commission disposition of the industry' petition.
Reference (55) provided an overview ' of the environmental qualification issue in light of recent developments. The preferred ' methods to achieve resolution of disputed technical issues were discussed. In Referen~ce (56) W. G. Counsil provided a detailed synopsis of progress achieved to date toward meeting Env?conmental Qualification requirements docketing a detailed response to the Safety Evaluation ' Report for Millstone Unit No. 2 within the alloted 90 days; and demonstrating conclusively that continued operation ~ of Millstone Unit No. 2 is consistant with public health and safety considerations. Referenie (57) R. C. Haynes to All Licensees, transmitted I&E Information Notice 81-29, ' which identifies adverse test results
., from test _ing of cquipment, some of which were related to Environme'ntal Quali fication.
The Staff does not require !
- - f repor. ting of adverse ' test results, but pointed out that in some
, cases such results could be reportable under provisions of 10CFR50 or 1.icense requirements.
leference (58) provided minor editiorial changes to Reference (56). .- In Reference (59) W. G. Counsil informed R. C. Haynes that NNECO would meet commitments made in Reference (55) by taking action to ensure continued reliable operation of existing RTD's at Millstone ' Nuclear Power Station No. 2. i.' x ,
.+
/ In Reference ( 60), R. 3. Clark requested that additional information be forwarded to the NRC's contractor, Franklin Research Center, to facilitate the review of the NNECO 90-day response on Environmental Qualification. Reference (61) consists of a Federal Register notice (47FR2876) on proposed rulemaking regarding , Environmental Qualification. The proposed rule would clarify the Commission's requirements and codify methods of qualification currently contained in guides, and certain NRC national standards, regulatory publications. Reference (62) provided the material requested in Reference (60) to FPC, noting that much of the information is considered to be proprietary and also that much of it had been provided previously. Compliance with the intent and spirit of the Paperwork Reduction Act was also questioned. W. G. Counsil submitted comments to the proposed rule -on Environmental Qualification in Reference (63). Mr. Counsil supported Chairman Pallidino's concept of a revised deadline, . also contending that the second re' fueling outage commencing after March 31,. 1982 constituted an achievable deadline. Commissioner action on the schedule, independent of the technical requirements cf the rule, was recommended. In Reference (64), R. A. Clark requested that additional information on TMI Action Plan items included in NNECO's EQ central file be sent to FRC to facilitate their review of information includes NNECO's 90-day EQ submittal. This identification . of all TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of January; 1, '198 f, all equipment with implementation . dates after January 1, 1981L and numerous other items, many of which were previously submitted to'the NRC. . Reference (65) ~ consists of a Federal Register Notice (47FR7782) proposed Revision to Regulatory Guide 1.89, on the 1 "Envircnmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants." The proposed . Revision 1 would describe procedures that would be acceptable to the NRC -Staff for complying with the proposed ' regulations in Reference (61). 7 Reference (66) R. C. Haynes"to al'1 Licensees, transmitted I&E
' In forma tion Notice 82-03 which reported results from tests
' conducted on electrical termina.'. blocks by Sandia Laboratories.
results indicated that certain terminal blocks The test exhibited leakage currents when exposed to a chemical / steam fe'nvironment. Although the Staff did not require action on this e topic, it did note that licensees should assure that their maintenance program considers the effect of [ preventative the clear.liness and integrity of maintenance activity in 4 ,
i i olectrical terminations and terminal blocks. i Rafgrence (67) submitted W. G. Counsil's comments on the Proposed Rsvision 1 to _ Regulatory Guide 1.89 (Reference (65)). Mr. Counsil notcd that the proposed revisions did not recognize the adequacy of _ prcviously submitted evaluations and documentations. Additionally, - tha revision would impose new costs and obligations on utilities without establishing a basis for these costs and obligations. The proposed revisions had stated that " ... no new costs or obligations
... (would be placed) or utilities."
Raference (68) provided notification to the Staff of the existence of a Substantial Safety Hazard (SSH) at Millstone Units 1 and 2. Two radioactive gas monitors were found to have unacceptable sensitivities in an input range of radioactive energies expected following an accident. The gas monitor supplier (Kaman) stated he will rectify the problem. Raference (69) consists of a Federal Register Notice (47FR28363) which suspends the previously imposed June 30, 1982, deadline for completion of Environmental Qualification. The rule in 47FR28363 is to remain in effect until the NRC supersedes 10CFR50.49 with the Final Environmental Qualification rule. Raference (70) provided the environmental qualification and TMI Action Plan information requested by Reference (64). . Our submittal identified TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of January 1, 1981, and noted that some of the requested information had been previously submitted to the,FRC on numerous occassions. Ysfirence ~(71), from the FRC to the NRC, acknowledged that NNECO had provided (via Reference (70) and numerous past submittals) the .information requested by Reference (64). (Raference (72) updated tne status of qualification testing on TMI item II.F.1.5, and provided NNECO's schedule for submittal of test reports.
-Ik Reference (73) Petitioner, Union of Concerned Scientists, challenges U.S. NRC's Final Rule on Environmental Qualification suspending the June 30, 1982 deadline by which operators of nuclear power plants were to show that certain safety-related electrical equipment would operate under adverse conditions, (47FR28363). -
In Reference (74) the NRC issued the Final Rule on Environmental Qualification of safety related electrical equipment, codifying methods and criteria to meet the Commissions requirements in this area. In Reference (75) NUGEQ (intervenors) statement of support for NRC's position on interim rule on environmental qualification. In Reference (76), W. G. Counsil re-affirmed Northeast Utilities' intention of making a determination on a hearing request by March 24, 1983.
I In Reference (77) NUGEQ (Petitioner) vs NRC (Respondent), petition to review the final rule on Environmental Qualification, 10CFR50.49 Via Reference (78) W. G. Counsil advised the NRC staff that NNECO interprets the Final Rule on Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants as superseding the 90-day responses requested in Reference (80). Additionally, schedules for the completion of qualification of electric equipment will be submitted by May 20, 1983 Reference (79) withdraws NNECO's request for a hearing, based on certain interpretations of the final rule. Reference (80) deferred submittal of documentation of qualification information for several weeks due to a determination that the vendor-supplied information was incomplete. Reference (81), transmitted the Franklin Research Centers' TER for Millstone Unit 2, and the NRC's SER. Several items required responses on a 30 and/or 90 day schedule. In Reference (82), NNECO provided responses to several items addressed in the Staff SER for Millstone 2 (Reference (74)). NNECO also stated thct the FRC TER contains no proprietary information and it may be released for public disclosure. This submittal fulfilled the 30-day response requirement of Reference (81). In Reference (83), NNECO provided responses to Supplement I to NUREG-0737, referred to as " basic requirements". Attachment Nos. 2 through 4 describe the current status of each of the five major areas (i.e., SPDS, CRDR, E0Ps, Regulatory Guide 1.97, and ERFs) in Supplement I to revise NUREG-0737 for the Haddam Neck Plant, Millstone Unit No. 1, and Millstone Unit No. 2, respectively. Our interpretation of the implementation and qualification schedules of Supplement I to NUREG-0737 and 10CFR50.49 was provided. In Reference (84), Revisions to the Technical Specifications were proposed to bring them into conformance with the Final Rule on Environmental Qualification, 10CFR50.49. The changes were proposed to delete the June 30, 1982 deadline date, and remove the requirement for a central qualification file. Reference (85) provided the list of equipment and schedule for resolution of qualification deficiencies required by Reference (74). Due to the recent arrival (April 6, 1983) of Reference (81), a complete response to the Reference (81) questions will be provided by August 18, 1983
m By-Reference (86), the U. S. Court of Appeals (D. C. Circuit) directed the Commission to provide an opportunity for public comment on the basis of the Commission's finding that extension of the July 30, 1982 EEQ deadline will not adversely impact public health and safety. In Reference (87), the Union of Concerned Scientists petitioned the U. S. Court of Appeals (D. C. Circuit) and requested that an expedited briefing schedule be adopted for review of the extended EEQ deadline in the final EEQ rule.
Docket No. 50-336 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Unit No. 2 Attachment 2 List of Electric Equipment important to Safety August 18,1983
FACILITY: Milletona Station Page 1 FQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STAWS OF EQUIMMT COVERE BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di_' gree Complete Pending Provided Comment 2-A Penetration Conax 85 I.A X 3-A T.B.'s CE 83 I.A X 4-A Cable Anaconda 79 II.A X 1 5-A Cable Kerite 78 I.A X 6-A Cable Cerro 71 II.A X 1 6-Aa cable Kerite 75 I.A X 7-A H2Recomb. Westinghouse 86 I.A X 8-A Recir. Fans Westinghouse 93 II.A X 1 9-A P.I.R. Fans Joy 92 II.A X 1 10-A Limit Sw. Namco 63 II.A X 1 X 2 11-A Limit Sw. Namco 64 II.A
-- v ~ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FACILITY: Milletons Station 2 Page: g .FQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: , _1 Date: 8/18/83 _ DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manu fac turer TER No. Category Agree Di . gree Complete Pending Provided Coment 12-A L.S. Conn. Conax 42 I.A X 13-A Set Screw Ideal 35 I.A X Conn. l 14-A SOV ASCO 16 I.A X l l 15-A SOV ASCO 28 II.A X 1,2 16-A SOV ASCO 16 I.A X 17-A SOV ASCO - - 3 19-A SOV ASCO 30 I.A X 20-A SOV ASCO. 30 I.A X 21-A SOV ASCO 27 I.A X
FACILITY: M111cton2 Stati:n Page: 3 gg EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 _.
# ** - 8/IEI83 DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di -P,ree Complete Pending Provided Comment 23-A MOV Limitorque 95 III.A X X 1 24-A MOV Limitorque 5 II.A 25-A SOV ASCO 30 I.A X 27.A XMTR FOXBORO 45 I.B X X X 1
l 28-A XMTR FOXBORO 56 I.B - - - - - - - - - -Deleted - - - - -- - 1 1 29-A XMTR FOXBORO 56 I.B X X 30-A XMTR FOXBORO 54 I.B X X X 31-A XMTR FOXBORO 45 I.B X X 32-A XMTR- FOXBORO 45 I.B X X r e
FACILITY: Millstone Station Page: 4 FQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 __ . . QUALIFICATION STAWS OF EQUIPMENT COVERE DOCKET: 50-336 BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manu facturer TER No. Category Agree Di. gree Complete Pending Provided Comment 34-A SOV Valcor 31 II.C , l 35-A Connector Litton 43 I.A X 36-A Penetration Conax 85 I.A X l X 1 37-A Cable Rockbestos 72 II.A 38-A Term.Blk. Weidm. 82 I.A X Term.Blk 84 I.A X 1-B GE X 1 2-B Cable Gen. Cable 74 IV Cable 77 I.A X 3-B Kerit e Anaconda 80 II.A X 1 4-B Cable Cable 70 II.A X 1 5-B Cerro 76 I.A X 5-Ba cable Kerite
Y ' FACILITY: Milletonn Station Page: 5
^ ^
- I UNIT: Two QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED Date: 8/J8/83 DOCKET: 50-336 BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type- Manu facturer TER No. Category Agree Di; gree Complete Pending Provided Comment 7-B MOV Limitorque 1 II.A X 1 X 1 8-B MOV Limitorque 1 II.A X 1 9-B MOV Limitorque 1 II.A 10 X 1 10-B MOV Limitorque II.A X 1 ll-B MOV Limitorque 2 II.A X 1 12-B MOV Limitorque 2 II.A 13-B MOV Limitorque 4 II.A X 1 14-B MOV Limitorque 14 II.C X 1 15-B MOV Limitorque 3 II.A X 1 16-B MOV Limitorque 8 II.C X 1 I
FACILITY: M111storie station Page: 6 WIT- % FQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED
" 3/MIM-BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di_ gree Complete Pending Provided Comment 17-B MOV Limitorque 12 II.C X 1 l
l 18-B MOV Limitorque 12 II.C X 1 19-B MOV Limitorque 12 II.C X 1 20-B MOV Limitorque 13 II.C X 1 21-B PP Motor GE 88 II.A X 1 23-B Fan Motor Joy 89 II.A X 1 24-B MO Damper Raymond Cont. - - 3 25-B PP lbtor Siemens/Allis 90 II.A X 1
7 l! t
- n e " e g# m 1 3 4 4 a # m P o - -
C d e - - d 0i - - C v X X _ Jo - - r P - - T N g - - E n M ni - - S od X X S i n d d E t e e e S aP t t S c e e A ie l l f t e e i e D D R dl X X E op - - T Hm o - - D C E - - R O E C e - - V S e O U r, - - -
^ C N P X c -
T t N i - - E 9 D M 4 - -
^ P I 0 e - -
U 5 e X X X X X X X X Q R r - - v ^ E F C A g F 0 O 1 S E U L T U y A R r A. A. A. B. B. B. B. A. A. A. T Co I - I - I I I I I I I I S Y Rg I I B Ne N t O a I C T A C I . F o I 3N 1 7 9 8 8 1 4 7 5 5 L 8 9 - 8 - 2 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 A 9R U 1E Q T s r i e l r l u A t / c s n a n C C o f e A A O i u m O M M O 'O O O t n e C / / C C C C C a a i E E E S E E S S S S S t M S G C G A G G A A A A A S n n t r r o 6 n o o t 3 ee mp t t e 3 py o o l o - iT M M R R l i w 0 u C C V T T V V V V V P P C C O H M O O O O O M T 5 E q P P M M S X X S S S S S Y T : I T L : E S a a a I T K W B B B B B B B B B B B B C I C E - - - - - - - - - - - - A N O C 6 9 0 1 5 6 6 0 0 3 6 6 F U D S 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
v FACILITY: Milletona Stetion Page: 8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAI. QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STAW S OF EQUIW WT COVER G BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Dio o,ree Complete Pending Provided Coment 47-B SOV ASCO 17 I.A X 66 X 2 49-B L.S. NAMCO I.B 50-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 67 X 1 51-B L.S. NAMCO I.B i 52-B SOV ASCO 17 I.A X X 1 53-B SOV ASCO 25 II.A X X 2 54-B L.S. NAMCO 65 I.B 55-B L.S. NAMCO 66 I.B X X 20 X 56-B SOV ASCO' 1.A 57-B L.S. NAMCO 67 I.B X 1 58-B SOV ASCO 17 I.A X 1
Page: 9 FACILITY: Milletonn Stetion
^ ^
- UNIT: Two # ##
QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED DOCKET: 50-336 BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JCO SCEWS Type Manu facturer TER No. Category Agree Di ' gree Complete Pending Provided Conung 19 X X X 66-B SOV ASCO I.B X X 3 66-Ba - - SOV ASCO X X 3 67-B P.Sw. Custom Comp. - - 68-B SOV ASCO 18 I.A X 68-Ea SOV ASCO 17 I.A X 69-B L.S. NAMCO 68 I.B X X 69-Ba L.S. NAMCO 68 I.B X X
- - X X 3 70-B SOV ASCO
- - X X 3 71-B L.S. NAMCo 72-B SOV ASCO 26 I.B X X X e
FACILITY: Milletonn Station Page: in EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: _ 1 __ a e: 8/18/83 DOCKET: 336 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di -r,ree Complete Pending Provided Comment 83-B MOV Limitorque 11 II.A X 1 84-B MOV Limitorque 7 II.A X 1 85-B PP Motor Westinghouse 94 II.A X 1 86-B Vac.Sw. Custom Comp. - - X X 3 89-B MOV Limitorque 9 II.A X 1 91-B XMTR Foxboro 47 I.B X X 940B SOV ASCO 23 1.A X 95-B SOV ASCO 18 I.A X 96-B SOV ASCO' 22 I.A X
FACILITY: M111stens Station Page: 11 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 UNIT
- Two
-QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED
# I 0/ ! - ---
DOCKET: 50-336 BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Df;' gree Complete Pending Provided Comment 97-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 98-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 99-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 100-B SOV ASCO 18 I.A X 102-B SOV ASCO 18 I.A X 106-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 107-B SOV ASCO 22 I.A X 108-B SOV ASCO 17 I.A X 110-B SOV ASCO' 18 1.A X ll2-B L.S. NAMCO 68 I.B X X
FACILITY: M1110tonn Station Page: 12 FQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 WIT- h
# ** 8/lR#"'
DOCKET: 50-336 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di cgree Complete Pending Provided Comment 113-B L.S NAMCO 68 I.B X X 116-B L.S NAMCO 68 I.B X X 119-B L.S. NAMCO 68 I.B X X 120-B L.S. NAMCO 68 I.B X X 121-B XMTR FOXBORO 46 I.B X X X 122-B Cable Rockbestos 73 II.A X 1 1-C MOV Limitorque 5 II.A X 1 2-C XMTR Foxboro 45 I.B X X X 5-C E.T.D. Conn. Rosemount 81 I.B X X X t
~ , . . _
y- - FACILITY: M111stona Station Page: 13 gy EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Rev: 1 QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED Date: _8/18/83 DOCKET: 50-336 BY RULE 10CFR50.49 NUSCO TER ASSESSMENT Equipment 1983 NRC Modification JC0 SCEWS Type Manufacturer TER No. Category Agree Di P,ree Complete Pending Provided Comment 8-C XMTR FOX BORO 55 I.B X X X 9-C XMTR FOX BORO - - X X X 14-C Pr. Sw. Cust. Comp 44 I.B - - - - - - - - - - Deleted - - - - - - - 1 15-C Rad. Det. General At. 34 II.A X 1 16-C XMTR GEM 57 I.B X 2 17-C Accelometer B&W 33 1.B X X X 18-C Cable B&W 69 I.B X X X 19-C Preamp. B&W 32 I.B X X X 20-C JCT.BX. B&W - - X X 3 22-C 3 H2Anal. Rad. BPC Monitor
-- .w
1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION QUALIFICATION STATUS OF EQUIPMENT COVERED BY RULE 10 CFR 50.59 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 COMMENTS
- 1. Refer to SER/TER Review Sheet for justification.
2.- Added qualification reference.
- 3. Equipment not evaluated in 1983 TER.
- 4. Equipment located in a mild environment.
Docket No. 50-336 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Unit No. 2 Attachment 3 Index to SCEW Sheet Package August 18,1983 ?
REV. 8-21-81 INDEX , SYSTEM SCEW SHT. NO. 125 VDC 120 VAC 4160V 480V Load Centers Reactor Cooling Valve HV1060,1062,1064 11-A, 20-A Valve HV7311 95-B, 113-B valve RC403, 405 1-C Pz Heaters, Prop. 34-A, 35-A Valve RC414-417, 422-425 Safety Injection & Cntmt. Spray HPSI Pumps MP41A, B, C 25-B 26-8 LPSI Pumps MP42A & B C.S. Pumps MP43A & B 21-B Valve SI654, 653 13-B 15-8 Valve SI662 2e A Valve SI651 10-A, 23-A Valve SI614 8-B Valve SI616, 626, 636, 646 Valve S1617, 627, 637, 647 9-B Valve SI615, 625, 635, 645 7-8 Valve HV3008, 3009 83-B Valve HV3010, 3011 Valve HV3021, 3022 89-B Valve SI411, 412 . 16-8 Valve SI652 24-A Valve SI656 13-B Valve SI663 15-B Valve SI655 13-B Valve SI624, 634, 644 10-A, 23-A Valve HV7312 108-B, 116-B Valve S1659, 660 . 94-B Valve SI618, 628, 638, 648 10-A, 25-A 47-B, 47-Ba Valve SI657 43-B, 10-D Valve SI306 (FT 306) Chem. & Volume Cnt1. Boric Acid Pumps MP19A & B Valve CH501, 508, 509, 514 84-B Boric Acid Tank HTR's P141,142,143,144 Valve CH512 Valve CH510, 511
.e 6 REV. '8-21-81 Valve CH505, 198, 506 11 -A , 19-A , 102-B , 120-B Valve CH515, 516 ~ 10-A, 16-A Valve CH517 10-A, 15-A Valve CH518, 519 10-A, 14-A Valve HV2524, 2525 10-B, 51-B, 52-B Charging Pumps MP18A, B, C 85-B Flush Pumps MP97A, B, C Valve CH192 Volume Cnt1. Tank Controls Valve CH504 25-D Feedwater Aux. Feedwater Pumps MP9A B Valve HV5275, 5276 14-B Valve HV5279 Valve HV5419, 5420, 5421, 5422 46-B, 46-Ba SGFPT - H5A & B Main Fdwtr Cnti Valve FV5268, 5269 Service Water Service Water Pumps MP5A, B, C Valve HV6399 Valve HV6482 Valve HV6489 Valve HV6400 Valve HV6438, 6439 72-B Valve HV6389, 6397 Service Water Strainer ML1A, B, C Valve TV6308, 6307A, 6306, 6307B 70-B, 71-B RBCCW RBCCW Pumps MPilA, B, C 29-B Valve HV6731, 6735, 6050, 6055, 6315, 6316 53-B, 54-B, 55-B, 56-B Valve HV6002, 6003 Valve HV6013, 6014, 6011 Valve HV6096, 6095 ll-B Valve HV6108, 6106 12-B Valve HV6072, 6073, 6075, 6077 96-B, 107-B Valve HV6080, 6084, 6088, 6092 97-B, 98-B, 106-B, 112-B Valve HV6739 Valve HV6004, 6006, 6005, 6007 Valve HV6015, 6017, 6016, 6018, 6012 Inst. & Sta. Air Valve HV7083 99-B
- m. 5/ 1/82
-3 Main Steam .
Valve HV4218, 4222 17-B, 19-B Valve HV4189, 4191, 4188 18-B, 20-B Valve HV4250, 4251 57-B, 58-B Valve HV4246, 4248 49-B, 50-B Valve HV4217, 4221 40-B, 40-Ba Valve HV4223, 4224 & PT-4223, 4224 36-B, 36-Ba Valve HV4193, 4209 66-B, 66-Ba Aux. Bldg. Ventilation Fuel Handling Fan MF20 Fuel Handling Damper HV8141, 8275, 8326 E.S.F.G.D. Damper HV8247, 8133, 8249, D.C. Sw. Gr. Fan MF54A & B Batt. Rm. Exhaust Fan MF112A & B Ctmt. & Encl. Bldg. Vent Cntmt. Air Fan MF14A, B, C, D 8-A Cntst. Purge Fan MF23 Cntmt. Sample Fan MF39A & B E.S.F.G.D. Air Unit MF15A & B 23-B Encl. Bldg. Fan MF25A & B Post Incident Fan MF18A & B 9-A Cntmt. Rad. Mon. Valve HV8121, 8122 Cntmt. Purge Valve HV8082 10-A Purge Fan Iso-Damper HV5050 Cntmt. Purge Damper HV8150, 8151 10-A, 17-A Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8079 - Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8074 Cntmt. Valve HV8128 Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8153 E.S.F.G.D. Damper HV8306 24B Fuel Handling Damper HV8062 E.B. Filt. Damper HV8254 E.G. Filt. Htr. X61 A, B Cntmt. Rad. Mon. Valve HV8124 Cntmt. Purge Valve HV8125, 8080 10-A Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8081 Cntmt. Purge Damper HV8126 Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8127, 8073, 8070 Encl. Bldg. Valve HV8078 Fuel Handling Damper HV8143 Encl. Bldg. Damper HV8063 E.S.F.G.D. Damper HV8312 248 H Purge Valve HV8377, 8378, 8379, 8380 11 -A, 21-A H Recombiner H29A & B 7-A S eam Jet Damper HV8654, 8695 Cntmt. Leak Damper HV8650, 8651 Cntmt. Rad. Mon. Valve HV8656
, l REV. 5/1/82 Aux. HVAC -
Cntl. Room Fan MF21A & B Cntl. Room Fan MF31A & B Cntl. Room Fan MF32A & B D.G. Room Fan MF38A & B Cntl. Room Damper Cnt1. Vital Sw. Gr. Rm. Fan MF51 & 52 Chilled Water Pump MP122A & B Chilled Water Pump Valves HV8846, 8847, 8848, 8850 Chilled Water Pump Valves HV8853, 8854, 8855, 8856 Cnt1. Rm. Htrs. X60A & B Cntl. Rm. Compressor MF22A & B Cnt1. Rm. Condenser MF36A & B Cntl. Rm. HVAC Ckts. Misc. Chiller X169A & B Sw. Gr. Room Valve PV6925, 6926, 6927 Sw. Gr. Room Fan MF133 & 134 Clean Liquid Radwaste Prim. Drain Tank Valve HV9015, 9016, 9230 11 -A , 19-A , 100-B , 119-B Gas & Aerated Liquid Radwaste Waste Tank Valve HV9125, 9126 ll-A,19-A, 68-B, 69-B,103-B Sampling System Valve HV7690 68-Ba, 69-Ba Encl. & Aux. Bldg. Drains Cntmt. Sump Valve HV9150, 9151 11 -A , 19-A , 110-B Rx Trip Sw. Gear Diesel Generator D.G. Power & Cnt1. D.G. Unit Cnt1. D.G. Air Compressors Boric Acid Heat Tracing Radiation Monitoring Hi Range Rad Detector RE8240, 8241 122-B,15-C , 37A Hi Range Effluent Monitor Rm 8168 See Note 1 Hydrogen Monitor 22C NOTE I: Refer to TMl letter dated April 16, 1982
REV. 8-21-81 Instrumentation Pz. Pressure & Level P100 & L110 27-A, 30-A Pz. Pressure P102 32-A Pz. Pressure P103 & P103-1 2-C, 1-D Pz. Level L103 2-D Pz. Temp. T101 & T109 3-D Pz. Relief Valve Monitors ZS200, 201, 402, 404 17-C, 18-C 19-C, 20-C Pz. Relief Valve Temp. T106,107,108 Quench Tank Pressure P116 Quench Tank Temp. T116 Quench Tank Level L116 RCP Loop Pressure Diff. Pill & 121 RCP Loop Temp. T112 & 122 5-C RCP Loop Temp. T111,115,121 & 125 4-D, 5-D RCP Loop Temp. T103,104 & 105 S.G. Pressure P1013 & 1023 31-A S.G. Level L1113 & 1123 29-A, 9-C S.G. Level L5271, 5272, 5273, 5274 28-A Note: See pages 192 & 193 for S.G. Atmosphere Press. P-4223 & 4224. Aux. ."d. Flow F5277 & 5278 8-C
, Cond. Storage TK Level L5282 15-D HPSI Pressure P301 LPSI Pressure P302 9-D Cntmt. Spray Pressure P303 HPSI & LPSI Flow F311, 312, 321, 322 11-D HPSI & LPSI Flow F331, 332, 341, 342 11-D Cntmt. Spray Flow F3023 & 3024 S.I. Tank Pressure P-311, 321, 331, 341 S.I. Tank Level L-311, 321, 331, 341 S.I. Tank Flow F305 Vol. Cntl. Tank Pressure P225 7-D Vol. Cntl. Tank (Letdown Temp.) T224 & 225 Vol. Cntl. Tank Level L226 8-D B.A. Tank Level L206 & 208 B.A. Pump Pressure P206 & 208 Charging Pressure & Flow P212 & F212 6-D Charging Temp. T229 & 221 Shutdown Cooling Temp. T351 12-D RWST Level L-3000 RBCCW Flow F6034 & 6035 19-D, 20-D Cntmt. Pressure P8113, 8114, 8115, 8116 91-B Cntmt. Pressure P8117 Cntmt. Temp. T8096 Cntmt. Humidity H8064 E.B.F.S. Pressure P8071 & 8075 E.B.F.S. Pressure P8060 E.B.F.S. Temp. T8072 & 8076 Charging Pump Cont. PS224X, 224Y, 224Z 86-B Containrent Press. PT8238, 8239 121-B Cont. Sump Level LT8242, 8243 16-C RBCCW Pump Pressure PS6119A, B, C 67-B
1 REV. 5/1/82 Reactor Protection . Turbine Trip PS4597A, B, C & D Nuclear Power S. G. Pressure (see page 444) Pz Pressure (see page 420) Pz Themal Margin (see page 436) R.C. Lo Flow (see page 433) S.G. Level (seepage 447) Ctmt. Pressure (see page 477) Mag Jack MG Ld Shed Control Elem. Assembly CEDA Fans MF13A, B, C CRD PWR CEA 1 thru 69 C.R. Reed Switch CEA 1 thru 69 Electrical Penetrations CONAX 2-A, 36-A Terminal Blocks 3-A, 1-B Cable Low Voltage Power 4-A, 4-B Control 5-A, 3-B Instrument (Cerro) 6-A, 5-B 1r.;trument(Kerite) 6-Aa, 5-Ba Instrument (Coaxial) 37-A, 122-B 5000 V Power 2-B Motor Control Centers MCC BS2 30-B MCC B51, B61 31-B Misc. Electrical Equipment Terminal Blocks (Elect. Penetration) 3-A, 1-B PAM (Weidmuller) 38-A Electric Conductor Seal Assemblies (CONAX) 12-A Set Screw Connectors (Ideal) 13-A Instrumentation (Cold Shutdown Only) Aux. Fd. PP Speed S4194A 13-D Aux. Fd. PP Press. P5281,5284,5289 14-D, 16-D, 17-D PMW Flow F210X,Y PMW Level L7277 RBCCW Sd Htx Flow F6042,6043 21-D, 22-D RBCCW Sg Tank Level L6001,6730 18-D, 24-D RBCCW Rx Temp Ctl, TIC 6306, 7 & 8 23-D
1 g ,I Docket No. 50-336 a Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Unit No. 2 ' Attachment 4 System Component Evaluation Work Sheets Discrepant Equipment Summary Sheets, including Justifications for Continued Operation , SER/TER Review Sheets , e-
,a i I
f % l August 18, 1983
/
\
_ egy ear - g e- =we t em
- grrer g-e -e+ swwy-e r w y v-& m e
u s- T w w.e 1 2 rbero ver. -- Unit IVo , SYSTEM col'.PONt:NT EVALUATION WOPK .eHEET Dock;t~' 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DC-CU! AT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING
, , METHOD ITEMS
_ Parameter ' Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , s System: Containment Operating Continuous Continuous 1. Time 2.e) Sequential Plant ID No.: EB2,WB2,EB4, Test EC1,EC3,WC3,WC5 Component: Low Voltage Temperature Profile 18 Power & Control Electri- ( F) Profile 36 D 2.d) Simultan-cal Penetrations eous Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 CONAX (PSIA) D Profile 37 2.d) Simultan-eous Test Model Number: Relative Simultan-7852-10000 Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 2.d) eous Test Function: Maintain elec-trical continuity through ^ Chemical i the cont. struct. Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM F 2.c) Simultan-Accuracy: Boron Boron cous Test Not Required Service:Various Low Radiation Sequential Voltage Power & Control 9.4 x 10 6 R 2.2 x 10 8 M 2.a) Test Ckts. Incation: Containment Aging Plant EL 14'6" Design Sequential 40 Years >40 Years Life 2.b) Test Flood Level Elev: (-)l4'4* Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec 7604-E-34 NUSCO Specification SP-GEE-45
- 2. CONAX Qualification Test Report IPS-556.2 a) Page 14 b) Par 5.6.2,Page 15 c) Par 5.12.1.2,Page 31 d) Par 5.12,Page 31 l e) Par 5.7,Page 18 l
l 11-1-80 i
, tcW: : 819ADICJ LZ9JCSTMT-"L)3J. Units Two SYSTFA COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUM ITATIOt 'WF
- QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS
~
Parameter Spec. Qual. Sr9c. Qital . Passive System: Various Operating Continuous Continuoes 1. Device he Plant ID No.:, Time Qualified Qual. By Design Box Component: Electrical TemperatureProfile 18 Simultaneous. ( F) D 4 Test Penetration Term, Blocks ,
! Note 2 Manufacture: Gene'ral Precsure Profile 19 Simultaneous Electric Co. (PSIA) Test Model Number: CR-151 Relative Simultaneous-100 100 1. 4 Function: To terminate connections to electrica] ~ Chectical Spray 2400 PPM Note 1 F
.2netrations Boron liote 1.
Mcuracy: Not Required Note 1 service: Various circuits nadiation 9.4 x 106 R 1.2X10 R M 4 Analysis by literature search Iscation: Containment Aging 1'lan t EL 14'-6" 40 yrs. Dedgn Armenius 12x106 Life 5 Ana'.ys is yrs Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" . Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA Nm
- Documentation
References:
Notes:1.
- term blocks are mounted in scaled boxes. No
- 1. Bechtel Tech. Spec. 7604-E-34 direct impingement. Protection considered adequate to
- 2. prevent failure due to an accident.
- 3. 2. Loca Qualification profiles from Doc. Ref. 4.
- 4. GE Ltr. G-Eli-8-16 dated 2/2/78 F Temp 260 320 349 320 260 Term Block Locatest Forwarded by G.E. Ltr. R.F. Thibault to R. Derosa dated 12/14/79 Press PSIG 21 75 103 75 21 G.E. Ltr. G-Ell-9-1-141 dated 10/18/ 79 Ril % 100 100 100 if 0 100
- 5. Wyle Report 17436-48 dated 2/3/81 Duration 1.5 Days 1.5 llrs. 3 Hrs. 4.5 Hrs. 8 Days 3-A 8-21-81
t.<_ e. mm m. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docht: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION E?NIRONMENT DOCUME! TAT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS , ,_ Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Electrical Operating 4.5,6,7 Simulta-Plant ID No.: Time &S neous Continuous Continuous 1. Test Component: Low Voltage Temperature Profile 18 4.5,6,7,&8 Power Cable ( F) Profile 2 D Simultaneous Test Manufacture: Anaconda Pressure Pro 111e 19 (PSIA) Profile 2 D 4.5,6,7,& 8 Simultaneous Test Model Number: EPR Insul, Relative CSPE Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1 4.5,6,7,& 8 Simultaneous Function: Wirewyas for Test Low Voltage Motors, Chemical g D.C. Systems, Heater, etc. Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM F 4.5,6,7. & 8 Simultaneous Accuracy: Not Required Boron Boron Test Note 1 Service: 480 V, 120 V AC, Radiation 8 125 VDC Circuits 1.5 x 108 R 2X10 R 2 4.5,6,7,& 8 *9"*" '" Test Incation: Containment Aging Plant Simulated Design 4.5.6,7,s 8 Sequential 40 Years 40 Years Life Test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. T N-E-17
- 1. Chemical spray consists of:
- 2. NUSCO Memo. D.W. Millef R.J. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 Dated 5/21/ 3000 PPM Boron as Boric Acid 4, FIRL Test Report F-C-4350-3, July 1976 O.064 Molar Sodium Thiosulfate
- 5. FIRL Test Report F-C2525, Oct. 1969 Adjusted with Sodium Hydroxide to a PH of 10.5 at Room Temp <
- 6. Anaconda letter dated 4/20/72
- 7. Anaconda letter dated 4/14/72
- 8. Anaconda letter dated 2/14/72 4-A 5/20/e3
. - _ _ - - _ _ . . - . . _ -. _- . - . - - . =_- __._. -. - - - - - . -
SCEWS No. 4-A 1983 TER No.__ 79 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Deleted References 4a through f.
- 2) Added new References 5, 6, 7 & 8.
l II) SER cor.. rns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A l l V) Justification for continued operation. f Reaffirmed Revised New
1 SCEW3 No. 4-A l 1983 TER No. 79 i Date 5/20/83 l III) Response: l NNECO presented information on the SCEW Sheet indicating that the equipment is fully qualified for a harsh environment. 1 1 NNECO has noted that the FRC apparently misunderstood the referenced l qualification documentation. The referenced specification (7604-E-17) i required ethylene-propylene rubber insulation (EP) and chlorosulfonated polyethylene jacket (CSPE) materials. A proper evaluation of the qualification report and the specification indicates similarity between the installed and tested equipment. ! In addition NNECO has referenced additional documentation (references 5, 6, 7. & 8) which conclusively indicates complete qualification of the equipment. NNECO also states that the documentation from the manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC Request For Additional Information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. NNECO again reiterates that this equipment (cables) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious.
v(I.Elr ?: QQAGEZTLRELCFbt. EidJ. Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock,t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. 1 P D .: Continuous Continuous 1. 4. (d) n u Test component: Control Cable Temperature Profile 18 (op) Profile 3 D 4.(a) Simultan-cous Test Manufacture : Kerite Pressure Profile 19 (PSIA) Prdfile 3 D 4.(a) Simultan-cous Test Model Number: FR Insul Relative FR Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 4.(a) Simultan-eous Test Function: Wireways for control & Low Level Pwr ' Chemical 3000 PPM Ckts Spray 2400 PPM Boron F 4.(b) Simultan-t n e us Test Rq red ar ous Control and Low Level Pwr Ckts. Incation: Aging Containment 5. Simulated Sequential 40 Years 40 Yrs 1. Test Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence un N NA NA NA NA NA
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-18 1. Chemical Spray Consist of:
2, hbSCO Memo. D.W. Miller to R.J. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281 Dated 5/21/79 0.28 Molar H B0 3 3 (3000 PPM Boron)
- 4. FRIL Test Report F-C4020-1 0.064 Molar NA S 0 223 (a) Fig. 1 N20H to make a PH of 10.5 at 77 F (b) Page 3-1 (c) Page 5-2 (d) Page 6-1
- 5. Kerite Engineering Memorandum 178A, May 1, 1979 5-A 11-1-80
m
- Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT
- DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qt.al . Spec. Qual.
System: Instrumentation Operating Continuous Continuous 1. Note 1 2,3, & 4 Plant ID No.: Time Component: Instrument Temperature Profile 18 Cable ( F) Profile 4 D 2,3,6 4 Simultaneous Test
- Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 The Rockbestos Co. (CERRO) (PSIA) Profile 4 D 2, 3, & 4 Simultaneous Test
- Model Number: Relative 2,3, & 4 XLPE Insul-Neoprene Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1. Simultaneous Function: Test
- Wireways for Instrumenta- ' Chemical ;
tion Ckts. Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM F 2,3, & 4 Simultaneous Accuracy: Boron Boron Test
- Not Required Service Radiation 2,3, & 4 8
General Instrumentation 1.5 x 10 8R 2X10 R K. Sequential Test
- Incation: Containment Aging Simulated S quential 40 Years 40 Years 1. .3, &4 Test
- Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-19A
- 2. CERRO Oualification Report F-C3798, March 1974
- Insulation only
- 3. TWX #2798 from Cerro - Cable Construction 1. Cable involves low current only. Continuous
- 4. CERRO Cert. Report dated 2/1/77 operation is inherent.
6-A 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 6-A 1983 TER No. _ 71 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Nd11 stone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Added References 2 and 3.
- 2) Delete References 4a through e.
II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A. ,
Response
Same as III. III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEh'S No. 6A 1983 TER Wo. 71 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO presented information on the SCEL! Sheet indicating that the equipment is fully qualified for a harsh environment. During the original (References 1 and 4) documentation review the licensee (NNECO) used engineering judgement concluding that the equipment is qualified. A review of the documentation and specification indicate that XLPE insulation was supplied and type tested by the manufacturer. In addition, NNECO has referenced additional documentation (References 2 and 3) which conclusively indicates conplete qualification of the equipment. NNECO also states that the documentation from the manufacturer which demonstrutes similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC Request For Additional Information (RFAI) dated ' January 6. 1982. NNECO again reiterates that this equipment (cables) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious.
m -m Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMDrfATION REF3 QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS 1 Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Instrumentation Operating Continuous Continuous 1. 3.d Simultaneou s Plant ID No.: Time Test Component: Instrument Cab: eTemperature Profile Profile D 3.a) Simultaneou:; ( F) 18 3 Test Manufacture Kerite Pressure (PSIA) Profile Profile D 3.a Simultaneou s Model Number: 600V 19 3 Test Relative 100 10) 1. 3.a) Simultaneoun Humidity (%) Test Function: Wireways
- for Instrumentatiof chemical 2400 ppm 3000 ppm Circuits Spray Boron F 3.b) Simultaneou:;
Accuracy: Not Required Note 1 Test Service: Radiation 1.5X'1b8R 2 X 108 R 2. 3.c) Simultaneou.; General Instrumentation Test ' Location: Agin9 40 yrs. Simulated Sequential Containment 40 yrs. 1. 4. Test Flood Level Elev:-14'4" N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Above Flood Level: YesX Subnergence CDocumentation
References:
Nctes: 1. Chemical Spray consists of: 0.28 Molar
- 1. NUSCO Standard Specification for Instrument Cable 113 B03 (3000 ppm Boron) 600 volts SP-GEE-14
- 2. NUSCO memo D. W. Miller to R. J. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281 0.64 Molar NA223S0 dated 5/21/79 N OH to make a pli of 10.5 at 77 F l
- 3. FIRL Test Report F-C4020-1 dated March, 1975
- a) Fig. I c) Page 5-2 l b) Page 3-1 d) Page 6-1
- 4. Kerite Engineering Memorandum 178A, May 1979 l
6- Al 11/1/80
y .- , Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EE Sh. 252(H-29A) METHOD ITEMS 253(H-29B) Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Post-Accident Hyd. Operating Continuous-Plant ID No.: Cont. Time ly one mon. 60 Days 1. 4.a) Sequential H-29A, H-29B or more Test Component: Temperature Profile 18 Hydrogen Recombiner (OF) Profile 5 A D 4.e) Sequential (See note 1.) Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 (PSIA) D Westinghouse Profile 5 4.b) Simultaneous Test Model Number: Relative Dwg. No. ME-7070-1 Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 4.b) Simultaneous Function: To limit Test Hydrogen existing in the Chemical containment Spray 2400 PPM 2500 PPM F 4.b) Simultaneous Accuracy: Boron Boron Test Not Required Service: Radiation g 1.5 x 10 R 2X10 R 2. 4.c) Sequential Test Location: Aging Plant esign Seg antial EL14'-6" (H-29A) EL38'-6" (H-29B) 40 yrs. 40 yrs. Life 4.d) Test Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Suhnergence NA NA NA NA NA Hn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Tech. Spec. 7604-M-510, Page 3,4
- 2. NUSCO memo, D.W. Miller to R.J. DeRosa, 1. Containment Temp deminishes to 200 F approx.
NEE-79-E-281 dated 5/21/79. hour after a Loca: H. Recombiner is started
- 3. 12 hours after a Loca
- 4. Westinghouse WCAP7709-L and Suppl.1-7 2. Spray consisted of 2500 PPM Boron as Boric
-(a) Suppl 3, Par. 3,1.2 acid with Sodium Hydroxide added to give a PH (b) Suppl 2, Page 3-24 (Test 2,3) of 10 (c) Suppl 2, Par. 3.6.2 (d) Suppl 6, Par. 6.3.2 (e) Temp. vs time profile forwarded by Westinghouse 7-A ltr. NE U 3546 dated Oct. 1, 1980 11-1-80 .
o-Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRO!DiENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS EESH. 206-209 Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , Systere: Cont. Air Recire. Operating Note 2 1 Yr. 1. 4.d) Sequential Plant ID No. : F-14A, F-14B e est h rfent:~' Temperature Profile 18 Air Recire Fans ) a e Ae D 4.c) Mmultan-2B cous Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 Westinghouse (PSIA) Table 2A, 2B o 4.c) Simultan-cous Test Model Number: Westinghouse Relative Syle No. 7180007 Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 4.b) Simultan-Function: eous Test Cool Containment Air ~ Chemical 9.5 PH Spray 2400 PPM Spray F 4.b) Simultan-Accuracy: Boron Note 1 eous Test Not Required service: Containment Radiation 8 1.5 x 108 R 2X10 K 4.a) Sequential Air Recirculation System-460V Test Location: Containment ^91"9 Plant El. 2'-0", 36'-0" 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. 4.e) Sequential Design Test Life Flood Level Elev: (-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Sepc. 7604-M-501 1. The chemistry environment was obtained using
- 2. a water spray solution of 1.43 weight percent
- 3. PH to a "alue of 9.5
- 4. Westinghouse WCAP 7829 boric soduim with acid andhydroxide.
adjusting (2500 PPM Boron)
~(a) Page 10,14 (c) Page 33,35 2. The units shall be designed to operate for (b) Page 15, 37 (d) Page 3 20 hrs. at peak incident conditions and 7 days (c) Page 16 at 15 PSIG, 200 F.
8-A 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 8-A 1983 TER No. _ 93 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Nd11 stone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW shtet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualfication not established
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New l
SCEWS No. 8-A 1983 TER No. 93 8/18/83 III) Response: NNECO's response to FRC's comments:
- 1) Adequate similarity between equipment and test specimens established - Deficient.
NNECO has in its document files, for audit review, the link which establishes similarity.
- 2) Aging degradation evaluated adequately - Deficient Aging has been adequately addressed and justified on the SCEW sheet which corresponds to WCAP-7829.
- 3) Qualified life or replacement schedule established - Deficient Qualified life has been established of forty (40) years.
There is nct replacement schedule.
- 4) Criteria regarding aging simulation satisfied - Deficient Aging simulation was done in accordance to IEEE-275 and IEEE-334 which is acceptable and meets qualification registrements.
- 5) Criteria regarding radiation satisfied - Deficient Radiation requirement as indicated on SCEW sheet is 1.5E8.
The equipment is qualified to 2E8 in WCAP-7829.
- 6) Equipment qualificaton not established - Deficient Equipment qualification has been established under WCAP-7829.
Equipment is considered fully qualified by NNECO. NNECO responses to FRC's NOTE comments:
- 1) These motors are qualified for steam / pressure exposure, radiation, chemical spray and thermal aging per WCAP-7829.
- 2) These motors are Totally Enclosed Air Over (TEAO) and are used for short duration af ter the accident.
- 3) The motors lubrication (grease for bearings) are replaces as recommended by the manufacturer. Historically, manufacturer's requirements and replacement cycles are very conservative.
SCEWS No. 8-A 1983 TER No. 93 8/J8/83
- 4) Since the motors are qualified under WCAP-7829 so are the motor lead splices. NNECO does not have to prove traceability to motor lead splices.
- 5) The motors are qualified for forty (40) years as specified in WCAP-7829 for both normal and accident environment.
- 6) Replacement schedules for grease, bearing, etc., does not, establish qualification. These items are maintained as required by manufacturer's recommendation.
- 7) These motors are TEA 0 which means there are nct open passages where outside air can enter the motor windings. Therefore, Beta emitter plate-out on the windings are not a concern because of the motor design.
- 8) Evidence of similarity between installed and tested unit is in NNECO qualification files and available for audit.
NNECO again reiterates that the equipment (motors) are qualified for their intended use and the qualification information is available in our files for audit.
e - Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET DockGt: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Operating Continuous 1 yr. I-3.b) simultaneous Plant ID No.: F-18A, F-18B Time test Component: Post Incident Temperature Profile 18 Profile 25 Recirculation Fans ( F) D 3.b) simultaneous test Manufacture: Joy Mfg. Co. Pressure Profile 19 (Reliance Electric Co. (PSIA) Profile 25 D 3.b) simultaneous Motor) test Model Number:24-17-5-3500 Relative simultaneous Special S/NGF15745, 15746 Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 3.d) test Function: Containment Air Mixing ' Chemical Spray 2400 PPM Note 1 F 3.c) simultaenoun Accuracy: Not Required Boron test 8 9 Service: Post Incident Radiation 1.5 x 10 R 1X10 R 2* sequential Recirculation - 460V 3.e) test Location: Containment Aging El. 14'-6" 40 yrs. 40 yrs. 1. 3.a) Sequential test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: YesX Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-507 1. Chemical spray per IEEE 323, page 19 (3000 PPM Boron) .
- 2. NUSCO memo, D. W. Miller to R. J. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 dated 5/21/79 -
- 3. Joy Qualification Test Report X-604, 4/6/77, revised 3/20/80 a) page 5 c) appendix A, page 8 b) page 12-17 d) page 1.
e) appendix F, page 1 9-A 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 9-A 1983 TER No. 92 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) e ncens: Equipment in NRC Category II.A _
Response
Same as III I) emcens: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
Documentation of similarity is available for audit in the file in accordance with I&E B79-01B. - IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. None V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New t
. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockit: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _
Operating Seq ential System: Various Plant ID No.: Various Time P Continuoun P 5 Component: Stem mounted Temperature Profile 18 limit switches ( F) Profile 6 D 5.a) Simultaneous Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Profile 19 (PSIA) Profile 6 5.a) Simultaneous D Test
" Relative
#*EA-180 100 100 1. 5.b) Simultaneous Humidity (%)
Function: Valve control ' Chemical interlocks and position 2400 PPM Note 1 F Simultaneous indication Spray Boron 5.b) Accuracy: Test Not Required Service: Various air Radiation 1.5 x 10 R 8 8 2.04X10 R 4. 5.c) Sequential operated and motor Test operated valves Location: Aging 40 yrs. Test & Gasket Inside Containment 40 yrs. except P.D.L. 2 Analysis replacement gasket (2 yrs.) req. every 2 y c. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4 '4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. FSAR safety analysis (Ammendment 20) 1. The spray consisted of boric acid, water, sodium
- 2. Wyle Report 17436-3 thoiosulfate and sodium hydroxide-PH-10 (3000 PPM Boron).
- 3. 2. Model EA-180 limit switches replaced originally
- 4. NUSCO memo, D. Miller to R. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 installed limit switches on the following valves:
dated 5/21/79 CH-515 EB-88 SI-614 SI-618
- 5. Vendor qual report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 CH-516 EB-89 SI-624 SI-628 (a) Fig.1, page 11 of 11 CH-517 UV-8082 SI-634 SI-638 (b) Page 9 of 11 CH-518 HV-8125 SI-644 SI-648 (c) Page 2 of 11 CH-519 11-1-80 (d) Page 3 of 11 10-A
.3 SCEWS No. 10-A 1983 TER No. _. 63 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) 1ER concerns: Equipment Qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 10-A 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. CONAX connectors are utilized on all stem mounted limit switches listed on SCEWS 10A as indicated in the master listing of electrical components by system submitted to NRC in October, 1980. See SCEW Sheet 12A.
- 2. Aging Analysis was accomplished by Wyle utilizing activation energies and other data documented in their data files. FRC apparently did not review NNECO response to SER wherein it was documented that preventive maintenance and surveillance will periodically monitor this equipment.
- 3. NNECO take exception to Note 3 on Page 5g of Item No. 63 of the TER. NNECO provided the C of C for NAMCO EA180 series switches, which referenced the proper test report. The C of C does not reference the document listed on Page Sa, Item 63 of the TER as indicated by FRC. Their review should be done utilizing the' proper reports which have been furnished to FRC previously. The Oualification Summary provided by Wyle is used solely for the aging parameter as noted on SCEW Sheet 10-A.
- 4. Operability time, as previously stated, for each switch listed on SCEWS 10-A is less than the qualified long term post accident duration listed on the SCEWS.
1, v Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONb T EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMEN AT Oi REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Various Operating Sequential Plant ID No.: Various Time P Continuous P 5 Test Component: Stem mounted Temperaturs Profile 18 limit switches ( F) Profile 7 D 5.a) Simultan-eous Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 7 D 5.a) Simultan-cous Test Model Number: EA-740' Relative Humidity (t) 100 100 1. 5.b) Simultan-Function: Valve control interlocks and position ~ Chemical ; indication Spray 2400 PPM Accuracy: Boron Note 1 F 5.c) Simultan-cous_ Test Not required Service: Various air Radiation 8 0 operated and motor 1.5 x 10 R 2.04X10 R 4. 5.b) Sequential operated valves Test Incation: Aging 40 yrs. Test & Gasket Containment except P.D.L. 3 Analysis replacement 40 yrs. Easket req'd every (2ymA 7 7e_ Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence NA NA NA NA NA nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. FSAR safety analysis (Ammendment 20) 1. The spray was composed of boric acid, water,
- 2. sodium thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide,
- 3. NAMCO Qual. Test Report QTR-111 Rev. O dated 10/1/81 PH between 10 & 11 (3000 PPM Boron).
- 4. NUSCO memo, D. Miller to R. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 2. Model EA-740 limit switches replaced originally 5-21-79 installed limit switches on the following valves:
- 5. Vendor qual. report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 HV-9230 HV-9151 HV-1060 a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 HV-9125 HV-1064 IIV-8380 b) Page 7 of 12 CH-506 HV-1062 HV-8378 c) Page 8 of 12 d) Page 3 of 1 11-A 5/20/83
SCEWS No. Il-A 0 1983 TER No.___ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Revised qualificatiodreference for the parameter " Aging". II) SER concerns Equipment in NRC Category II. A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New 1
SCEWS No. 11-A Date: 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: 1 - CONAX connectors are utilized on all stem mounted limit switches listed on SCEWS 11-A as indicated in the master listing of electrical components by system submitted to NRC in October 1980. See SCEWS 12-A. 2 - SCEWS 11-A revised to reflect new qualification reference for aging. 3 - FRC did not review the report referenced in the C of C for the EA740 switches, as stated in Note 3 of Item 64 page 5g. The rernrt listed by FRC on page 5a and used in the evaluation on pages Sa-g, Item 64 is not the report referenced on SCEWS ll-A. (For all parameters with the exception of aging). See 2 above for aging qualification reference. 4 - Operability time, as previously stated, for each switch listed on SCEWS 11-A, is less than the qualified long term post accident duration listed on the SCEWS.
f w . Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIROYDENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Various Operating Simultaneous Plant ID No.: Time Continuous P P 5.b) Test Component: Electric Temperature Profile 18 Conductor Seal Assembles ( F) Profile 8 D 5.b) Simultaneous for SMLS's and SV's Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 CONAX (PSIA) Profile 9 D 5.c) Simultaneous Test Model Number: Part No. Relative 100 100 1. 5.d) Simultaneous N-110Dl-32, N-11001-33 Humidity (%) Test Function: Provide a sealed cable ~ Chemical entrance for SMLS's/SV's Spray 2400 PP!! Note 2 F 5.d) Simultaneous Accuracy: Boron Test Not required 8 Service: Radiation 1.5X108R 1.5X10 R 4. 5.a) Sequential Valve limit switches Test and pilot operators Incation: Aging Containn.ent Sequential 40 Years 40 Years PDL 6 Test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4"4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA nn l
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. FSAR safety analysis (Ammendment 20) 1. All modules must be compatible with Fig. 5.3e1
- 2. The test data base configuration was subjected
- 3. to the test profile given in Fig. 5.3.2.
- 4. NUSCO memo D. Miller to R. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 2. Chemical spray consisted of boron and NA0H with
. dated 5/21/79 a PH of 10.5 (3000 PPM Boron)
- 5. CONAX qualification report IPS-409 dated 3-9-79 3. Assemblies were purchased under NUSCO P. O. 607 386 a) Par. 5.1 c) Par. 5.3.2.4 for qualified components b) Par. 5 3.1 & 5.3.2 d) Par 5.3.2 2.
- 6. CONAX Qualification Report IPS-325 12-A 5/20/83
btl tQs :- . Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT ME! ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Passive System: Electrical Operating Design Device See Plant ID No.: Time Require- Qualified Qual. Continuous Continuous ment By Design Box Component: Set screw Temperature Profile 18 Simulta Connectors ( F) 3 D 3. neous Test Manufacture: Ideal Pressure Profile 19 Simulta-(PSIA) 3 D
- neous Test Model Number: Cat. No. Relative Simulta-30-210 and 30-211 Humidity (%) 100 100 D 3- neous Function: Splice Test Assemblies ~ Chemical Simulta-Spray 2400 PPM 2640 PPM F 3.
neous Accuracy: Not required Boron Boron Test Service: Valve limit Radiation switch circuits 2.4 x 107 R 3 x 108 R 4. 5.a) Analysis Incation: Various Loca- Aging Plant tions inside containment- 9366 yrs. Design 40 yrs. at 120 0 F Life 5.a) Analysis Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'-4" Above Flood Level: YesX Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA NA nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. 2.
- 3. NUSCO memoranda GEE-79-214, CEE-78-358, GEE-79-271
- 4. NUSCO memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281 dated 5/21/79
- 5. WYLE Report 17436-1 dated Oct. 8, 1980 a) Page 21 13-A 11-1-80
- m. m.
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qu l. Spec. Qual. simultaneous System: Chem.& Vol. Control Operating P Continuous P 3.a) rest Plant ID No.: HY-518 Time HY-519 Component: Selenoid TemperatureProfile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneous Operated Valves (OF) D Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaaeous ASCO (PSIA) D Test Model Number: Cat. No. Relative 100 100 D 3.c) Simultaneous NP-8320A-185V See Note 3 Humidity (%) Test Function: Pilot Valves for Ch-518 and CH-519 ' Chemical Spray 2400 PPM 3.d) Simultaneous B y Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: Charging Line Radiation 1.5X108R 2 x 10 8R 4. 3.e) Se uential Distr. Valves Te t Location: Containment Aging Req. maint. El. 8'-6" Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 2 Test every20 yrs Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulxnergence NA NA NA NA Hn NA
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1.
- 1. Originally installed valves replaced during
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B 8-8-79 outage.
- 2. SMLS Type EA-180 a) Appendix A Par. 5 3.
b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 Viton Gaskets replaced with EP during 1983 refueling outage. c) Appendix A Pa r . 8.1. 3 D cument cont.: d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 4. NUSCO Memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281, dated 5-21-79. e) Appendix D 14-A 5/20/83
otests . Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Chem. & Vol . Cont . Operating P Continuous P 3.a) Simultaneous Plant ID No.: HY-517 Time Test Component: Solenoid Temperature Profile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneous Operated Valve D (OF) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneous (PSIA) D st Model Number: Type NP Relative 100 100 D 3.c) Simultaneous 20 6-381-6RF Humidity (%) Test Function: Pilot Valve for CH-517 ~ Chemical 3.d) Simultaneous Spray 2400 PPM B Test Boron p Accuracy: Not Required Service: Aux. Spray Radiation 1.5X106R 2 x 108 R 4. 3.e) Sequential Test Iocation: Containment Aging Sequential Req. maint. performed El. 8'-6" Test 40 Years 20 Years PDL 2 every 20 yrs , Flcod Level Elev:(-)l4"4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Suhnergence NA NA NA NA NA un
- Documentation Meferences: Notes:
1.
- 1. Originally installed valve replaced May, 1979 (Refer to
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. O
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B W. G. Counsil letter to R. Reid dated 4/18/79)
- 2. SMLS Type EA-180 a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) I.ppendix A Par. 9.4.I.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 4. NUSCO Memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281, dated 5/21/79 15-A 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 15-A 1983 TER No. _ 28 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.' Corrected Model Number typograpEical error. Added qualification reference and revised qualified life. s SER concerns: ui Pment in NRC Category U.4 II) Response: Same as III . Equipment qualification not established. III) TER concerns: Response: See I above ' IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A e s s .
~
V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised *
.New u, -
E
'y *
% .s -
s - n . r ,- t 3 '\**= ,.. ,1 h A m
Unit: Two ' I' , I' < SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ' /./ . , i
/j 4 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING
! EQUIPMENTfESCRIPTION
Ccoponent: Solenoid Temperature Profile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneous Operated Valves (OF) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Pro 111e 19 Profile 10 3.D) Simultaneous (PSIA) , D Test Model Nt=her: Type NP- Relative 100 100 D 3.c ) Simultaneous 8320A-185V See Note 3 Irumidity(s) Test Function: Pilot Valves for CH-515, CH-516 ~ ~ Chemical 3.d) Simultaneous Spray 2400 PPM B Test p
Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: Letdown system Radiation 1.5X108R 2 x 10 8R 4. 3.e) Sequential containment isolation Test Location: Containment Aging Req. maint. El. 8'-6" Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 1 Test every 20 yrs. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21673/TR Rev. B
- 1. Originally installed valves replaced during a) Appendix A Par. 5 October,1979 outage b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 2. SMLS Type EA-180 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 3. Viton Caskets replaced with EP during 1983 e) Appendix D refueling outage.
- 4. NUSCO Memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281, dated 5/21/79
- 5. Tech. Spec. 'ra ble 2.6-2 16-A 5/20/83
6- w
; T Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK RHEET
" Doc 1 cts 50-336, 1 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATICN REF* OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION QUAL.
METHOD .TTEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. - Qual. Approx. 5 System: Encl. Bldg.Filt.Sys. Operating Sec . Fol- Cont inuous 5. 3.a) , lowing a gimultaneous Plant ID No.: HV-8150, Time Loca. Test HV-8151 _ Component: Solenoid Temperature Profile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneous Operated Valves ( F) , D Te s t-
^
Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 J.b) Simultaneous (PSIA) D Test Model Number: Valve Type Relative 100 100 D 3.c) Simultaneoua 206-381-3RVU See}4ote Humidity (t) Test Function: Pilot Valves fo - EB-88, EB-89 ~ Chemical 2400 PPM i 3.d) Simultaneou Spray Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron B F Service: Containment Rad. Radiation 1.5 x 10 8 R 2 x 10 8 R 4. 3.e) Sequential Mon. Isolation Test Incation: Cantainment Aging Req. maint. El. 38'-6a Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 1 Test every 20 yrs. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" A NA NA NA Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/ TR Rev. B 1. Originally installed valves replaced during Oct.1979 Outag'
- 2. SMLS Type EA-180 a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 3. Viton gasket replaced with EP during 1983 refueling outage c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 4. NUSCO Memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281, dated 5/21/79
- 5. Tech. Spec. 3.6-2 17-A 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 17-A None 1983 TER No. __ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Revised qualified life, added Note 3 and Reference 1. II) SER concerns: None
Response
III) TER concerns: None
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New i L _ - - _ - - -
- w e,s~~
Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;ts 50-336 EQUIFMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Approx. 5 System: Note 1. Operating Sec . Fol . Continuous 2 1.a) Simultaneous-Plant ID No.: HV-9230 Time lowing a Test HV-9125, CH 506, HV-9151 Toca. Component: Solenoid Temperature Profile 18 Profile 10 Simultaneous Operated Valves ( F) D 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 Simultaneous (PSIA) D 1.b) Test Model Number: Relative 100 100 D 1.c) Simultaneous NP-206-381-6F Humidity (%) Test Function: Pilot Valves for LRR 43.1, GR-ll .1, ' Chemical Simultaneous CH-506, SSP-16.1 Spray 2400 PPM B F 1.d) Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: Containment Radiation 1.5 x 108 R 2 x 10 8 R K 1.e) Sequential Isolation Test Location: Containment Aging Req. maint. El. 3'-0", 3'-6", 8'-6", Sequential performed 2'-6" 40 Years 20 Years PDL 3 Test every 20 yrs, Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Suhnergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. LRR-Clean Liquid Radwaste System
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B GR-Gaseous Radwaste System a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 CH-Chemical & Volume Control System c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 SSP-Drain System e) Appendix D l
- 2. Tech. Spec. Table 3.6-2 2. Originally installed valves were replaced during October, 1979 outage
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 3. SMLS Type EA-740 19-A 5/20/83
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING
!*ETHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Apprcx. 5 System: Reactor Coolant operating Sec . Fol- Continuous 4 3.a) Simultaneous Plant ID No.:HV-1064, Time lowing rest HV-1062, HV-1060 a Loca. Component: Solenoid TemperatureProfile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneoun Operated Valves ( F) D Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneoun (PSIA) Test D Model Number: Valve Type Relative 100 100 D 3.c) Simultaneoun 206-381-3F Humidity (%) Test Function: Pilot Valves for RC-001, RC-002,RC-003 ' chemical 3.d) Simultaneoun Spray 2400 PPM B F Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: R C Sample Valves Radiation 1.5 x 10 8 R 2 x 10 8 R K 3.e) Sequential Test Location: Containment Aging Req. maint. Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 1 Test every 20 yrs. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn X No 5
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B 1. Originally installed valves were replaced during a) Appendix A Par. 5 October, 1973 outage b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 2. SMLS Type EA-740 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 4. Tech. Spec. Table 3-6-2
- 5. R.K. McCarthy letter to file dated 9-29-80 GEE-80-710 20-A 5/20/83
- uv - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unitt Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock 2t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTAT N REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS
, Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _
System: Encl. Bldg.Filtrati n roperating P Continuous P 3.a) Simultaneou s ) Plant ID No.:HV-8380, Time Test HV-8378 Component: Solenoid TemperatureProfile 18 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneoua Operated Valves (OF) D Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 3.b) Simultaneou.; l (PSIA) D Test Model Number: Valve Type Relative 100 100 D 3.c) Simultaneous l NP-8344 B58V See Note 3 Humidity (%) Test l Function: Pilot Valves for EB-91, EB-100 Chemical 2400 PPM 3.d) Simultaneous Spray B F Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: Hydrogen Purge Radiation 1.5 x 10 k 2 x 10 8 R 4. 3.e) Sequential Valves l Test Location: Containment Aging Req . maint. El. 38'-6" Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 1 Test every20 yrs. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" NA NA NA NA NA Above Flood Level: Yesx Subnergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AyR-67368/Rev. 0
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B
- 1. Originally installed valves replaced during October, 1979 outage a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 2. SMLS Type EA-740 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 3. Viton gaskets replaced with EP during 1983 refueling e) Appendix D outage.
- 4. NUSCO Memo D. W. Miller to R. DeRosa NEE-79-E-281, dated 5/21/79 21-A 5/20/83
Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EE SH 40(S1614) 68(S1634) METHOD ITEMS 66(S1624) 70(S1644) Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating Note 1. Note 1. Ncle 1. Note 1. Note 1. Plant ID No.:SI 614, SI Time 624, SI 634, SI 644 Component: Valve Motor Temperature Profile 18 Profile 11 4.b) Simultaaeour Operators ( F) D Test Manufacture Limitorque Pressure Profile 19 Profile llA Simultaneous (PSIA) D 4.f) Test Model Number: Serial Nos. Relative 100 100 1. 4.a) Simultaneour 157040,157041,157042, Humidity (%; Test Function: 7p43 For SI-61 $ 5,SI-634 ' Chemical SI-644 2400 PPM Note 2. F 4.d) Simul taneous Spray Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: SI Tank Isola- Radiation 1.5 x 108 R 2.04 x 1083 K 4.c) Sequential tion Test Location: Containment Aging El. 19'-3" Approx. Plant Sequential 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 4.e) Test Life Flood Level Elev: (-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Specs 7604-M-223A, 7604-E-40, 1. Not Applicable. Valves are administratively controlled 7604-E-11B
- 2. open (accident position) - Tech Spec 3 5-1A
- 3. 2. Table 1, IEEE Std. 382, Page 12
- 4. Limitorque Project Report 600456 a) Par. 3.4.2 b) Fig. 6 c) Par. 4.3 d) Par. 4.4.2 e) Par. 1.0 f) Fig. 5 23-A 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 23-A 1983 TER No. 95 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: None
Response
III) TER concerns: Absence of FMEA Statement
Response
F f s equipment will not affect other safety related equipment or cause an operator to be misled. IV) Prope,' sed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised i New
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EE SH 39(S1651) 62(S1652) METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating Continuous 4,) Sequential Plant ID No. : SI-651, Time Continuous Test SI-652 Component: Valve Motor TemperatureProfile 18 Profile 11 Simultaneous Operators (OF) D 4.g) rest Manufacture: Limitorque Pressure Profile 19 Profile ll i 4.b) Simultaneous (PSIA) D Test Model Number: SMB-2 Relative 100 100 1. 4.a) Simultaneous S/N 155532, 155533 Humidity (%) Test Function: Operators for SI-651, SI-652 ' chemical Note 2. 4.d) Simultaneous Spray 2400 PPM F Test Accuracy: Not Required Boron Service: Shutdown Cooling Fadiation 1.5 x 10 8 R 2.04 x 108 n K 4.c) Sequential Isolation Valves Test location: Containment Aging Plant Sequential El. O'-0"' (-) 1 ' -6 "
, 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 4.f) Test Life Flood Level Elev: (-)l4'4*
Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence NA NA NA NA NA Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Specs. 7604-M-223A, 1. Valves are interlocked to prevent opening during 7604-E-40, 7604-E-llB
- 2. operation (Ref. Logic Diagram 25203-28115, SH 47) .
- 3. Long Term Requirement for Boron Percipitation Prevention.
- 4. Limitorque Proje.:t Report 600456
- 2. Table 1, IEEE Std. 382, Page 12 a) Par. 3.4.2 b) Fig. 6 c) Par. 4.3 d) Par. 4.4.2 c) Par. 3.6 f) Par. 1.0 g) Fig. 5 24-A 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 24-A 5 1983 TER No. Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued aperation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 24-A 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 24-A, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 39 & 62, as noted on SCEWS 24-A. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was 'ised as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-OlB. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982.
1x_ms- . Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUME ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating Within 5 Plant ID No.: HY618,628 Time Sec. After Continuous 2 1.a) Simultaneous-638,648 a Loca. Test Component: Solenoid Temperature Profile 18 Profile 10 1.b) Simultaneous. Operated Valves (OF) D Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile 19 Profile 10 1.b) Simultaneous (PSIA) Test Model Number: Valve Types Relative 100 100 D 1.c) Simultaneous. NP-206-381-6RF Humidity (%) Test Function: Pilot Valves for SI618,SI623,SI638 ' Chemical SI648 Spray 2400 PPM Accuracy: Not Required Boron B F 1.d) Simultaneous Test Service: Safety Injection Radiation Sequential Tank Test and Fill Valves 1.5 x 108 R 2 x 10 8 R K 1.e) Test Incation: Containment Aging Req. maint. El. O'-0" Sequential performed 40 Years 20 Years PDL 3 Test every20 yrs. Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" NA NA NA NA NA Above Flood Level: YesX Sulznergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B '
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. Tech. Spec. Table 3.6-2
- 3. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/ Rev. 0 25-A 5/20/83
Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;ts 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , System: Reactor Coolant Operating Simultaneous Plant ID No.: PT-100X,Y Time ontinuous Continuous 2 1 Test Component: Temperature Pressure Transmitter (OF) ProfHe Pcodle 16, 18 318'F D 14 Simultaneous To n t-Manufacture: Pressure 1 Foxboro (PSIA) Profile Simultaneour Profile 16, 19 90 PSI D 34 Test Model Number: E-llGM Relative i Humidity (%) 100% Profile Simultaneous Function: Pressurizer 100% D 34 Test Beater Control Gemical Spray 2400 PPM Accident Monitoring F summary Accuracy: sht. 27A
*0.25% F.S.
Service: Pressurizer Radiation 8 Pressure Monitoring 1.5 x 10 R K summary sht. 27A Location: Containment Aging See El. (-)5'-0" 40 yrs. P.D.L. summary sht. 27A Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: YesX Suhnergence NA NA NA NA NA Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Foxboro Test Report Q9-6005 -
- 2. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 '
27A 11-1-80
SUMMARY
SEEET NO. 27A SCEW SHEET NO. 27A
, 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: PT-100X, 100Y; PRESSURIZER PRESSURE, CONTROL MEASUREMENT CHANNELS MANUFACTURER: FOXBORO Model EllGM S/N 2602021, 2602022 QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented qualification concerning their resistance to chemical spray, radiation and time / temperature aging. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: PT-100Y provides signal input for the post accident monitoring, subcooling margin monitor. Both these compt,ents initiate control signals which automatically energize or de-energize pressurizer heaters on a low or high pressurizer pressure condition. These compornes also provide control room pressurizer pressure indication. The post accident subcooling margin monitor, will alarm a pressure input failure which indicates to the operator that this system should not be used for any safety related function. The automatic control of pressurizer heaters is a function which can be accomplished manually from the control room. An alternate method for determining primary plant pressure is provided by charging pump discharge pressure, and these components are not required for mitigation of a Chapter 15 Design Basis Event. O
SCEWS No. 27-A 1983 TER No.__ 45 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: See IV below IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment will be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982, presently scheduled to commence in the first quarter of 1985. V) Justification for continued opezation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 28A 56 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEW Sheet 28A is deleted. Safety function previously accomplished by LT5272 and LT5274 is now done with LT1113 and LT1123. See SCEWS 29A. II) SER concerns: N/A
~
Response
III) TER concerns: N/A
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Facif Millattne Nuc8 ear W . 540. a i SYSTEM COMPONFNT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit: Two Docket 50-336 , DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION " METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ Operating Continuous Continuous Simultaneous System: Main Steam 4 Test Time 1 Plant ID No.: M- m 3A LT-ll23A Temperature Component: Differential Pressure ( F) Profile 18 350*F D 1 Simultaneous Test Transmitter Manufacture: Pressure 85 psig D 1 Simultaneous Foxboro Profile 19 Test Model Number: Relative 100 "" "' N-E13DM Humidity (%) 100% Test Function: R.P.S. Input ' Chemical
& Accident Monitoring spray 2400 ppm 3000 ppm F Simultaneous 1
Accuracy: Boron Boron 5% Service:0' Steam Generator Radiation Sequential Level Monitoring 1.5 x 108 R 2.0x10 R. K 1 Test Aging See es Iocation: Containment 1) 10 yrs , Sequential 40 yrs. P.D.L. 1 1&2 El. 16'-0" 2) 9 yrs. Test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" NA NA NA Suhnergence NA NA Above Flood Level: YesX Kp
- Documentation
References:
Notes: Wyle Laboratories Report No. 45592-4 dated 8/18/83. 1. Transmitter qualified life is 10 years. 1
- 4. MPll FSAR Table 7.5.2 2. Viton "0" Ring for transmitter cover is qualified for 9 years at 120*F, however, must be replaced each time cover is removed.
29A 8-18-83
SCEWS No. 29-A 56 1983 TER No. __
- Date
- 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
SCEW Sheet 29-A revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. l l II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B ,
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
vuxp; v Units Two SYSTEM COMPONt.NT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst 50-336 ENVIROIDCNT DOCUMET ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIFTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ . System: Reactor Coolant Operating :ontinuous Continuous Simultaneous Plant ID No.: LT-110X Time 2 1 Test LT-110Y Component: Temperature Profile 18 ' Differential Pressure ( F) 318'F D Profile Simultaneoun Transmitter 34 Test Manufacture: Pressure , (PSIA) ) Profile 19 Profile Simultaneoun Foxbor 90 PSI D 34 Test Relativ 1 Model Number: E-13DH Humidity (%) Profile Simultaneoun 100% Function: 100% D 34 Test PZR Heater Contro Ichemical See 2400 PPM summary khS[EfSUbS$$thSSng 1 Spray y Accuracy: sht. .30A Serv c Pressurizer Radiation See level monitoring 1.5 x 108 R summary sht. 30A Iocation: Containment Aging See El. (-)5'-0" 40 years P.D.L summary sht. 30A Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" ^ ^ ^ Above Flood Ievel: YesX Subnergence Mn _
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Foxboro Test Report Q9-6005
- 2. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 11-1-80 30-A
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 30A SCEW SHEET NO. 30A 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Pressurizer level (control measurement channels) LT-110X,110Y differential pressure transmitters MANUFACTURER: FOXBORO E13DH S/N 2648245, 2648246 QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented qualification concerning their resistance to chemical spray, radiation and time / temperature aging. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: This equipment provides, charging pump control circuit input which de-energizes all but one charging pump on a high pressurizer level condition, and control room indication. These components also provide signals which energize or de-energize all pressurizer heaters on a high or low-low level condition respectively. A low pressurizer level signal from these components also provides a backup signal to start all charging pumps. This equipment provides control signals only and is not required for mitigation of a Chapter 15 Design Basis Event. The control functions described above can be manually performed from the control room in the event of a worse case component failure.
SCEWS No. 30-A 1983 TER No. 54 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: See IV below IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment will be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982, presently scheduled to commence in the 'first quarter of 1985. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New L
bOGJ ?: . jy Two SYSTEM COMPONt;NT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit Dock 2t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ . System: Main Steam Operating Continuous Continuous 3imultaneous The 2 1 Test Plant ID No. PT-1013 A,B, (fomhr'en : ^' Temperature 350*F 1 Pressure Transmitter ( F) Proflie 18 Simultaneous D Test Manufacture: Pressure Profile 19 1 Foxboro (PSIA) 85 psig Simultaneous D Tone 1 Model Number Ralative Humidity (%) 100% 100% D Test Function: ESAS & RPS ' chemical Simultaneous 4 PPM 3000 ppm
& Accident Monitoring Spray Test Boron F 1 Accuracy:
Boron 0.5% Span Service: Steam Generator Radiation 2 X 10 R Pressure Monitoring 1.5 x 10 8 R k- 1 1 16 0" 40 yrs. 1) 10 yrs. P.D.L. Sequendal See Notes i Test 1&2
- 2) 9 yrs.
Flood Level Elev: (--)l4'4" NA NA NA NA NA Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 45592-4 dated 5-18-83 1. Transmitter qualified life is 10 years.
- 2. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 2. Viton "0" Ring for transmitter cover is qualified for 9 years at 120*F, however, must be replaced each time cover is removed.
31-A 8-18-83
SCEWS No. 31-A 1983 TER No. 45 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEV sheet. SCEW Sheet 31-Arevised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I .B ,
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New i
); O BLOJ Ps N tausa-us utro eo Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock ^t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ ,
System: Reactor Coolant Operating Continuous Continuous 2 1 Simultaneous Plant ID No. : PT102 A,B, Time Test C,D l 1 Component: Temperature ( F) 350*F Simultaneou t Pressure Transmitter Profile 16 D 18 Test Pressure 1 ! Hanufacture: Foxboro (PSIA) Profile 16 85 psig i D Simultaneou 19 s To c t-1 Model Number: Relative , Simultaneou ; Humidity (%) 100% 100% D l N-EllGM Test Function: ESAS & Reactor Protective System and ' chemical Simultaneoua Spray 2400 PPM 3000 ppm , p 1 Accident Monitoring Accuracy: Boron Radiation 8 Sequential Service: Pressurizer 2 X 10 1 Test pressure monitoring 1.5 x 10 8R K See Notes Incation: Containment Aging 1) 10 yrs. 1 Sequential El. 7'-O" 40 yrs. P.D.L. Test 1&2
- 2) 9 yrs.
Flood Level Elev:(-)l4 '4" g g g g g Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 45392-4 dated 5/18/o3 1. Transmitter qualified life is 10 years.
- 2. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 2. Viton ,,0,, Rings for transmitter cover is qualified for 9 years at 120*F, however, must be replaced each time cover is removed.
i 8-18-83 32A __m__-
1 i SCEWS No. 32-A 1983 TER No. _ 45 Date: 8/18/83 ! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL.IFICATION SER/TER REVIEW l Millstone Unit 2 1 Docket No. 50-336 I I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEW Sheet 32-Arevised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I .B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. 373 Reaffirmed Revised New I
M m. r Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT D(X3JMENTATION REF3 QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ME'DIOD ITEMS 1 Parasmeter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Reactor Coolant Operating Sequential Plant ID No.: RC-422,414, Time Continuous Continuout 1 2 Test 415,416,417,423,424,425 Component: Solenoid Temperature Simulta-Valves ( F) Profile 18 346*F D 2c neous Test Manufacture VALCOR Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile 19 ll3PSIG D 2c neous Model Number: Test V526-6042-3A V526-6043-3A Relative Simult'a-Humidity (t) neous Function: Reactor Head 100 100 D 2c Test . and Pressurizer ' Chemical 2200 ppm ~ Simulta-Venting Spray 2400 ppm S0 "* "* Accuracy: N/A ' Boron
.N[L@223 F 2c Test Note 1 Service Radiation Sequential 1.5X108R 2X108R K 2b Test Incation: CTMT Aging Sequential 38 '6" elev. 40 years 40 years PDL 2a,2b Test Flood Level Elev(-)l4 '4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. NUREG 0578 item 2.1.9 1. The solution consisted of 2,200 ppm boron as
- 2. Valcor Engineering Qualification Test Report boric acid (II3 BO 3 ) in solution with 0.064 QR52600-515 molar sodium thiosulfate (NA S 0 u ered
- a. Appendix I with sodium hydroxide (NAOll)2 2 3to make a ph
- b. Appendix III - of 10.5 at room temperature,
- c. Appendix IV
~
34a 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 34-A 31 1983 TER No. Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: None .
Response
III) TER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.C
**E **
Valves are not continuously energized. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New )
e - Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF2 QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. __ Spec. Qual. System: Reactor Coolant Operating Plant ID No. : RC414,415, Time Sequential 416,417,422,423,424,425 continuous continuous 2 _1 Test Component: Electrical Temperature Simulta-Connector ( F) neous Profile 18 340*F D Profile 33 Test Manufactures LITTON Pressure j, simulta (PSIA) 4 i , neous , Model Number: Profile 19 105PSIG D Profile 33 Test , ,- CIR06VI-20-15S Plug - - CIR02VI-20-15P Receptacle Relative , Simulta- , Humidity (t) s
, neoits -
Function: Electrical 100 100 D Profile 337f Test e . Connector
' Chemical , Simulta--
Spray 2400 ppm 3000 ppa ; ', eneous , Accuracy: N/A ' Boron Boron 'E Ic )Iest ,
/ '
i Service RCS Venting Radiation Sequential 3 1.5X108R ,l. ' Solenoid Valves 2X108 R K a ; n.la
,i -
Te s. t .
.!l r Incation: CT!ff Aging . ,
38'6" - s Sequential 40 yacs 40 yens PDL lb Test / Flood Imvel Elev:(-)l4'4" ; Above Flood I4 vel Yes X Submergence NA NAL NA . NA ,i NA un
<3 '
~
cDocumentation
References:
Notes: ,/ ,
= ; 1. Qualification Test of Electrical Connectors - 'e - ' >; +
under A simulated IDCA/DBE be sequential / s
/-
exposure to environments of theimal aging, i , , j bachground radiation, containment pressurization, ' '
- ,' i vibration, radiation (accident level), steam and / ,
- chemical spray.
- I
- 2. NUREG 0578 item 2.1.9 e
'~
- a. Appendix B b. Paragraph 5.1 and 5.2
- c. Paragraph 5.6 35a , 11-1-80
. , r
m . ] Docket: 50-333' ; DOCUMENTATION REF3 OITFSTANDING ; EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENT QUAL.
' DES N PTION METHOD ITEMS Qual. Qual.
Parameter Spec. Spec. _
' Simulta-Systemi Containrent Operating neous Plant ID No. , ED3,ED8,ED9, Time Continucus Continuous 1. 2.c) Test WD3,WD8,WD9 Ckmaponent: Instrumentat f or ,Tamperature Simulta-Electrical Penetrations f3F) Profile Profile D. 2.d) neous 18 38 Test Manufacture: CONAX Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile Profile neous Model Number: 7852-10000 19 38 D. 2.d) Test Relative Simulta-Humidity (%) neous Function: Maintain elec- 100 100 1. 2.d) Test .
~
trical continuity through ' Chemical Simulta-the cont. struct. Spray 2400 PPM 6200 PPM neous Accuracy: Not required Boron Boron F. 2.e) Test Service: Various instru- Radiation Sequential mentation circuits 9.4 x 10 6R 2.0 x 10 8R M. Test Location: Containment Aging Plant EL 14'6" Design Sequential
, 40 Yrs. > 40 Yrs. Life 2.a) Test Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence NA NA NA NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. NUSCO Specification SP-GEE-45
- 2. CONAX Qualification Test Report IPS 556.1 a) Par. 5.6.2.3 Page 13 b) Par. 5.6.1 Page 11 c) Par. 5.8.1.1 Page 21 d) Par. 5.8 Page 21 e) Par. 5.8.1.2 Page 23 .
36A 11-1-80
Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMDrF DOCUMENTATION T2F3 QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION M:M' HOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System Simulta- f Systems Rad. Monitoring Operating Design 1 neous Plant ID No.: Z1RM8240/ Time Continuous Continuous (P.A.M.) Test B,C - 22RM8241/B,C f Simulta-Component: Coaxial cable Temperature ne us ( F) I Profile 18 Profile 39 D Test _, \ Nanufacture: Pressure Simulta- l Rockbestos Co. (PSIA) nect% ! Model Number: RSS 6-104- Profile 19 Profile 39 D 1 Test 1081 Design Simulta-Relative Humidity (%) Require- neous Function: Rad monitoring ~ cabling ' Chemical Simulta-Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous
' Boron Boron F 1 Test Accuracy: Not required Service: Low level Radiation Sequential signal circuits 1.5 x 10 8 R 2 x 10 8 R K,L 1 Test Incation: Containment Aging Plsnt Design Sequential
- 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life i Test Flood IAnvel Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un cDocumentation
References:
, Notes:
Rockbestos Qualification Test on Second Generation Sclid Dielectric Coaxial Constructions and Cellular Dielectric Coaxial Constructions - Report #2806 dated 4/23/82 l l 37-A 5/20/83 ,
i l SCEWS No. 37-A 1983 TER No. - 72 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Deleted Notes 1 & 2 - no longer applicable.
- 2) Deleted old documentation Ref. 1 (Firewall III). Added new documentation. Ref. 1 (Second Generation Coaxial Cable 1081).
- 3) General changes.
II) SER concerns: Equipment is NRC Category II.A ,
Response
Same as III. III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established.
**P "* See attached.
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justificatien for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New )
SCEWS No. 37-A 1983 TER No. 72 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO has presented new information on the. SCEW Sheet indicating that the equipment is fully qualified for the environment in which it is required to function. In response to the FRC deficiency NNECO states the following: The original cable which had test anomalies identified by the radiation monitor manufacturer has been replaced in containment with the next generation (#1081) coaxial cable. The cable was replaced during Millstone Unit 2 1982 refueling outage. In addition, report, data, specifications, and letters from the manufacturer which demonstrates qualification and/or similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC Request For Additional Information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. NNECO again reiterates that this equipment (coaxial cable) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious.
Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF0 QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION MEDIOD ITEMS 1 Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System Simulta-Systempost Accident Mon. Operatin9 Design neous Plant ID No. : T356, T357 Time Continuous Continuous (P.A.M.) 1.a) Test Component: Terminal block Temperature Simulta-( F) neous Profile 18 Profile 40 D 1.a) Test Manufactures Weidmuller Pressure Simulta-Terminations Inc. (PSIA) neous Model Number: Type SAK4 Profile 19 Profile 40 D 1.a) Test Relative Design Simults a-Humidity (t) Require- neous Function: Termination of 100 100 ment 1.a) Test ,
~
monitoring circuits ' Chemical Simulta-Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous Accuracy: Boron Boron F 1.a) Test Service: Containment sump Radiation Sequential level monitors 1.5 x 10 8 R 2.07x10 8R K,L 1.b) Test Location: Ccntainment Aging Plant Design Sequential 40 Yrs. - 40 Yrs. Life 1.c),2. Test Flood Ievel Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Sulnergence NA NA NA NA NA un (Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. FRC final report F-C5205-3 a) Page 4-7 b) Appendix C c) Appendix B
- 2. Weidmuller letter dated June 10, 1980 38-A 11-1-80
bt s_R5 mv Units Two SYSTEM COMPONhar SVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockat: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUME! ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Passive System: Various Operating Continu- Device See Plant ID No.: Time ous Continuous 1. Qualified Qual. By Design Box Component: Electrical Temperature Simultaneous Profile 3., A., I, Penetration Term. ( F) Test Blocks 26 Note 1. 2. Manufacture: General Pressure Electric Company (PSIA) H 3., A., I. Simultaneous Nxe 1. 2. Test Model Number: CR-151 Relative Simultaneous Function: To Terminate 100 100 1. 2. Connections to Elec- ' Chemical trical Penetrations Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation NA NA NA NA NA Various Location: Enclosure Aging Plant Bldg. EL 14'6" 40 yrs. 12x106 yr Design 4 Arrhanius Zone A25, A26 Life Analysis Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhmergence No J
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. Qualification Profiles from Doc. Ref. 2.
- 1. Bechtel Tech. Spec. 7604-E-34
- 2. GE Ltra. G-EH-8-16 Dated 2/2/78 Temp F 260 320 340 320 260 G-EH-9-141 Dated 10/18/79 Press PSIG 21 75 103 75 21 Term. Block Loca Test Forwarded by G.E. Ltr., RH% 100 100 100 100 100 R. F. Thibault to R. DeRosa Dated 12/14/79 Duration 1 5 Days 1 5 Hrs. 3 Hrs. 4.5 Hrs. 8 Days
- 3. FSAR Amendment 17
- 4. Wyle Report 17436-48 dated 2/3/81 8-21-81 1-B
M 1-U LC : NN. m. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , Passive System: Electric Operating Continu- Contin- Device See Plant ID No.: Time ously uously 1. Qualified by Qual. Design Box component: 5000 V Temperature Simulta-Power Cable ( F) Profile Profile A neous 24 35 2.a) Test Manufacture: General Pressure Profile 35 Simulta-Cable Corp. (PSIA) Note 1) A neous H Table 3 2.a) Test Simulta-Model Number: EPR insul.& Relative Hypalon Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 2.a) "e "8 Function: Wireways Test for Medium Voltage Chemical Motors & Power Sources Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Service: Radiation Sequential 4160 V Systems lx10 7 R 5x107R 1. 2.a) Test Incation: Aging Greater Plant yrs. Various Plant Areas than 40 design 3 Analysis Outside Containment years life Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Invel: Yes Subnergence nn
- 5. xx:umentation
References:
Notes: There are no 5 Kv safety related cables
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-15 in areas outside of containmerat that could
- 2. General Cable Corp. Report Dated 11/70 be subjected to temperatures higher than a) Table 4 261*F during normal or accident conditions.
- 3. Wyle Laboratories letter in response reference:
174365-018 dated October 24, 1980 and
'Telecon dated October 29, 19 80 5/20/83 2-B -
SCEWS No. 2-B 1983 TER No. _, 74 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1. General changes to SCEW Sheet.
- 2. Note 1 has been rewritten for clarification.
II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A ,
Response
Same as III III) TER concwins: Response: Equipment documentation not available. See Attached. . IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New l
SCEWS No. 2-B 1983 TER No. 74 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO presented information on the SCEW Sheet indicating that the quipment is fully qualified for the environment in which it is required to function. In response to the FRC deficiency NNECO states the following: Report, data, specifications, and letters from the manufacturer which demonstrates qualification and/or similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC Request for Additional Information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. NNECO again reiterates that this equipment (cable) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious.
Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock.t 50-336 ENVIRONMENT b)CUMElbATIbN REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-System: Electrical Operating Continu- Continuous 2.C) neous Plant ID No.: Time ous 1. Test Component: Control Temperature Cable ( F) Profile 20 As D Simultaneous Profile 3 2.a) Test Manufacture: Pressure Kerite (psIn} Note 1. Profile 3 A 2.a) Simultaneous To n t-Model Number: Relative Fr Insul. Fr Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 2.a) Simultaneous. Function: Wireways for , Test Control and Low Level ' chemical Pwr. Ckts. Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation Various Control and Simultaneous Low Level Pwr. Ckts, lx10 8 R 2x108R 1. 2.b) Test Incation: Aging General Plant 40 yrs. Simulated 1. 3 Sequential Areas Outside Contain- 40 Yrs. Test ment Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. Environmental pressure is less than
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-18 2PSIG for about 13 sec. This is insignificant.
- 2. Franklin Institute Report F-C4020 1 a) Fig. 1 b) Page 5-2 c) Page 6-1
- 5. -Kerite Engineering Memorandum 178A, May 1,1979 11-1-80 3-B
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docist: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENT TION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. ulta-System: Electric Operating Continu- Continuous 2,3,4,5, & 6 Plant ID No.: Time ous 1. Component: Low Voltage Temperature Power Cable (OF) .sProfile 2 A, D 2,3,4,5, & 6 Simultaneous Profile 20 Test Manufacture: Pressure Anaconda (psyn) Profile 2 2,3,4,5, & 6 Simultaneous Note 1. A Test Model Number: Relative EPR Insul. CSPE Jacket Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 2,3,4,5, & 6 Simultaneous est Function: Wireways for Low Voltage Motors, ' chemical i D.C. Systems, Heaters, Spray Simultaneous Accuracy: Etc. NA NA NA NA Test Not Required Service: 480 V,120 VAC, Radiation 2,3,4,5 & 6 Sequential 8 125 VDC Circums 1x107R 2x10 R 1. Test Iocation: General Plant Aging Areas Outside contain- 40 yrs. Simulated 1. 2,3,4,5,& 6 Sequential ment 40 Yrs. Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. Environmental pressure is less than 2PSIG
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-17 for about 13 sec. This is insignificant.
- 2. FIRL Test Report F-C4350-3 , July 1976
- 3. FIRL Test Report F-C2525, October, 1969
- 4. Anaconda letter dated 4/20/72
- 5. Anaconda letter dated 4/14/72
- 6. Anaconda letter dated 2/14/72 4-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 4-B 1983 TER No. _ 80 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Deleted References 2a through 2f.
- 2) Added new References 3, 4, 5, & 6.
r II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A .
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
See attached. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A l V) Justification for continued operation. l N/A Reaffirmed Revised New I 1
SCEWS No. 4-B 1983 TER No. 80 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO presented information on the SCEW Sheet indicating that the equipment is fully qualified for a harsh environment. NNECO has noted that the FRC apparently misunderstood the referenced qualification documentation. The referenced specification (7604-E-17) required ethylene-propylene rubber insulation (EP) and chlorosulfonated polyethylene jscket (CSPE) materials. A proper evaluation of the qualification report and the specification indicates similarity between the installed and tested equipment. In addition NNECO has referenced additional documentation (references 3, 4, 5, & 6) which conclusively indicates complete qualification of the equipment. NNECO also states that the documentation from the manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this , information via NRC Request For Additional Information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. NKECO again reiterates that this equipment (cables) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious.
e Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , System: Instrumentation Operating Continu- Continu- 2,3, & 4 Plant ID No.: Time ous ous 1. Note 1 Component: Instrument Temperature Cable ( F) Profile 20 Profile 4 A,D 2,3,& 4 Simultaneous ! Test
- Manufacture: Pressure Rockbestos Co. (PSIA) 2.3, & 4 i (Cerro) Note 2. Profile 4 A Simultaneour l Tost
- Model Number: Relative XLPE Insul-Neoprene Humidity (%) 100 100 1. 2,3, & 4 Simultaneou: l Functicn: Jacket Test
- Wireways for Instru- ~ Chemical i mentation Ckts NA NA NA NA NA Spray Accuracy:
Not Required Service: Radiation 2,3,& 4 Ceneral Instrumentation 8.60x106R 2x100R CL Simultaneous Test
- Location: General Plant Aging
"** Sequential Areas Outside Contain- 40 yrs. 2, 3, & 4 uent 40 yrs. 1. Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Eubmergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec 7604-E-19A
- Insulation Only
- 2. Cerro Cert. Report Dated 2/1/77 1. Cable involves low current only. Continuous
- 3. TWX #2798 from CERRO - cable construction. Peration is inherent.
- 4. CERRO Qualificaton Report F-C3798, March 1974 2. Environmental pressure is less than 2PSIG for about 13 sec. This is insignificant.
5-B
SCEWS No. 5-B 1983 TER No. _, 70 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Deleted References 2a through 2.
- 2) Added References 3 & 4.
II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A -
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
See attached. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. V) Justification for continued operation. j Reaffirmed Revised New .
SCEWS No. 5-B 1983 TER No. 70 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO presented information on the SCER Sheet indicating that the equipment is fully qualified for a harsh environment. During the original (References 1 & 2) documentation review, the licensee (NNECO) used engineering judgement concluding that the equipment is qualified. A review of the documentation and specification indicate that XLPE insulation was supplied and type tested by the manufacturer. In addition, NNECO has referenced additional documentation (P.eferences 3 & 4) which conclusively indicates complete qualification of the equipment. NNECO also states that the docunentation from the manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this
^
information via NRC Request For Additional Information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. I NNECO again reiterates that this equipment (cables) is qualified for its intended function and proper review of the documentation will unequivocally confirm the obvious. l r-
j e Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF) QUAL. OUTSTANDING q UI N DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Systems Instrumentation Operating Continuous Continuous 1. 2.c) Simultaneous Plant ID No.: Time rest Temperature Componentknstrument goF) Profile Profile A,D 2.a) Simultaneous Cable 20 3 Test Manufacture: Kerite Pressure (PSIA) Note Profile A 2.a) Simultaneous 71odal Number: 600 V 1 3 Test Relative 100 100 1. 2.a) Simulta'neous Humidity (%) Test Function: Wireways for + instrumentation circuits ' Oemical l j Accuracy: Not required Service General Radiation 8.60 X 10 6 2 X 108 R C,L 2.b) Simultaneous instrumentation R Test Incation: General plant Aging areas outside the entmt. 40 yrs. Simulated 1. 3. Sequential 40 yrs. Test Flood h vel Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sutmergence un cDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. NUSCO Standard Specificatin for instrument cable 1.
600 volts SP-GEE-14 Env ironmental pressure is less than 2 PSIG for about 13 seconds. This is insignificant.
- 2. FIRL Test Report F-C 4020-1 dated March 1975 a) Fig. 1 b) Page 5-2 ,
c) Page 6-1
- 3. Kerite Engineering Memorandum 178A, May 1979 l 5-Ba 11/1/80
ut:0-Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONEraT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockote 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTAT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Must open System: Safety Injection Operating and stay Sequential n inu us Plant ID No.: SI615, Time open - 4. 3.) Test SI625, SI635, SI645 conHnnons Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operators ( F) ll20 F max. Profile 12 A Simultaneous 3.d) Test Manufacture: Pressure 2. Limitorque (PSIA) Profile 12 A Simultaneous H 3.d) Test Model Number: SMB-1-25 Relative 1., 2. S/N 137101, 137102, Humidity (%) g Simultaneous Function: 137103, 137104 100 100 3.a) Test Operators for SI615, ' Chemical SI625, SI635, SI645 Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation LPSI Flow 4.80x106R 2.04x108R C,L Sequential 3.c) Test Incation: Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant i EL.(-)5'0", W. Pipe Simulated Design Sequertial Pent, Rm. Note 1 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: i Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Na
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. ZONE
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-780 SI 615 A18
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 SI 625 A18
- 3. Limitorque Test Report B0003, 11-13-74 to 1-23-75 SI 635 A18 a) Par. 2.1.1 SI 645 A18 b) Par. 5.0 c) Par. 2.3 d) Fig. 1 e) Par. 2.1.3
- 4. FSAR Sec. 6.3.3.1 & P & ID 25203-26015
~
5/20/83
SCEWS No. 7-B 1 1983 TER No.__ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENTIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sut=ary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. i II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised New
1 SCEWS No. 7-B I l 5/20/83 l l 1 III) Response to TER Concerns: ) A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 7-B, see Item I above. ' The following is in response to Page Sf, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class E. 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 50-53. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal. Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the fiant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program. g
m Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock 3t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUME! ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter _ Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , Must open Systens: Safety Injection Operating and stay Continuous 9""" " Plant ID No.: SI616, Time open _ 4. 3.) Test SI626, SI636, SI646 Continuous Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operators ( F) 1120F max. Profile 12 g Simultaneoun 3.d) Test. Manufacture: Pressure 4. Limi*orque (psyg) Profile 12 3 Simultaneou: , H 3.d) Test Model Number: SMB-00-15 Relative 1., 2. S fN 134075, 134077, 134079, Humidity (%) A Simultaneous Function: 134081 100 100 3.a) Test Operator 9 for SI616, - Chemical SI626, SI636, SI646 Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Requ ired Service: Radiation HPSI Flow 4.80x106R 2.04x10 8R C,L Sequential 3.c) Test Location: Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant EL(-) 5'0", W. Pipe Simulated Design Sequential Pent Rm. Note 1 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. ZONE
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-780 SI 616 A18
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 SI 626 A18
- 3. Limitorque Test Report B0003, 11-13-74 to 1-23-75 SI 636 A18 a) Par. 2.1.1 SI 646 A18 b) Par.>5.0 b) Par. 2.3 d) Fig. 1 e) Par. 2.1.3
- 4. FSAR Sec. 6.3.3.1,P & ID 25203-26015 8-B
1 SCEWS No. 8-3 1 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 IQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIPICATION SER/TER REVIEW M111 stone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEV sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification. Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III ' III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. 7 Reaffirmed Revised New
SC&! Mo. 8-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 8-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class B. 3 - No motor brske 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 42-45. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Alco note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the Plant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program. I
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock:.t 53-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUME! ATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING j METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , System: Safety Injection Operating Sequential Plant ID No.: SI617, Time Continuous Continuous 3.) Test
;iI627, SI637, SI647 Note 2 4.
Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operator ( F) 112 F max. Profile 12 0 3 Simultaneous 3.d) Test Manufacture: Pressure 4* Limitorque (pgIA) H Profile 12 Simultaneous A 3.d) Test Model Number: SMB-00-15 Relative 1., 2. S /N134076, 134078, 134080, Humidity (g) Simultaneous Function: 134082 100 100 A 3.a) Test Operators for SI617, Chemical SI627, SI637, SI647 Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation HPSI Flow 4.80x10 6R 2.04x10 8R C,L Sequential 3.c Test Location: Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant EL.(-) 5'0", W. Pipe Simulated Design Sequential Pent. Rm. Note 1 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. ZONE
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-780 SI 617 A18
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 SI 627 A18
- 3. Limitorque Test Report B0003, 11-13-74 to 1-23-75 SI 637 A18 a) Par. 2.1.1 SI 647 A18 b) Par. 5.0 2. Must open and stay open throughout the event.
'c) Par. 2.3 d) Fig. 1 e) Par. 2.1.3
- 4. FSAR Sec. 6.3.3.1, P & ID 25203-26015 9-B /20/83
SCE'4S No. 9-B 1983 TER No. _ 1 Date: 5/20/83 - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sum =ary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established l Response: See attached i IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Reviced l l New l i l i
1 1 SCD1 No. 9-B 5/20/83 1 111) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 9-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is l and has been available for audit per the requirements of ' I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information ' via NRC request for additional information (Rr47) dated ' January 6, 1982. 2 - Class B. 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance j 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 46-49. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal, Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the Plant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program. l t l
m SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock,t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT m AT ON REF* QE. ONEN METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Chem. & Vol. Operating Continuous Continuous Plant ID No.: Control Time 4. 3.) Sequential HV2524 Test Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operators ( F) 112 F max. Profile 13 g Simultaneout 3.c) Test Manufacture: Pressure Lic.itorque (psy3) Profile 33 2. H Simultaneous g 3.c) Test Model r: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S/N 1 8 Humidity (%) 100 100 g Simultaneous 3.d) Test hetion: erator for CH-429 - Chemical
~
NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Requ ired Service: Radiation Charging Pump Sequential Discharge 6 1.65x10 R 2.04x108R C,L 3.a) Test Incation: Aging Plant Encl. Bldg
- Design Sequential EL.(-) 5'0", W. Pipe 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life Test Pent. Rm. Zone A18 3.b)
Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A, 4/26/72 to 8/30/72 a) Par. 2.1 b) Appendix C, F-C3441 Par. 4.0 t) F-C3441, Fig. 3 d) F-C3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 c) F-C3441, Par. 3.3.3
- 4. FSAR Fig. 9.2-2 0-B 5/20/83
SCEG No. 10-B 1983 IER No.__ 10 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not eetablished Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised New
SCE 1S No. 10-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Nu.ber is included on SCEWS 10-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page Sf, FRC Item 5 1 - 1.etter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I L E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated
' January 6, 1982. '
2 - Class Rh 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the Octooer, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheet 104. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been availabic for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. ,
~ Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMEkbA ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
System: React.-Bldg.CCW Operating Continuous Continuour, Sequential Plant ID No.: Time 4. HV6096, HV6095 3.) Test Component: Valve Temperature 2. Motor Operators ( F) 112 F max. Profile 13 3 Simultaneous 3.c) Test Manufacture: Pressure 2. Limitorque (PSIA) Profile 13 H Simultaneous A 3.c) Test Model Number: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S /N152851, 152849 Humidity (%) 100 100 Function: Operators A 3.d) Simultaneous Test for 2-RB30-1A, 2-RB30-1B Chemical i Spray Accuracy: NA NA NA NA NA Not Required Service: Radiation RBCCW to RC Pumps 4.80x10 6R 2.04x10 8R C,L Sequential Incation: Encl. Bldg. 3.a) Test Aging Plant EL(-) 5'0" W. Pipe Design Sequential Pent. Rm Zone A18 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Le, vel Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sulxnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4/26/72 to 8/30/72 a) Par. 2.1 l b) Appendix C, F-C3441 Par. 4.0 l 8) F-C 3441, Fig. 3 d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3
- 4. FSAR Table 9.4-2, Fig. 9.4-2 ll-B 5/20/83
SCEk'S No. 11-B 1983 TER No.__ 2 Date: 5/20/83 -- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification. Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Fauipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 11-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 11-B see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 154 and 155. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items. FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982.
- l l
Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS METHOD Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: React. Bldg. CCW Operating Sequential Time Continuous Continuous 4. Tests Plant ID No.: 3.) HV6108, HV-6106 Component: Valve Temperature 2. Motor Operators ( F) 112 F max. Profile 13 A Simultaneout 3.c) Test Manufacture: Pressure Limitorque (psyn) H A 3.c) Simultaneous Test Model Number: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S/N 152850, 152848 Humidity (%) 100 100 A Simultaneous Function: 3.d) Test Operators for 2-RB37 -2A, Chemical 2-RB37-2B Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Requ ired Service: Radiation RC Pump 011 Clg. Water Sequential Disch. 4.80x106R 2.04x10 8R C,L 3.a) Test It> cation : Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant (-) 5' O " W. Pipe Design Sequential Pent. Rm. Zone A18 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4/26/72 to 8/30/72 a) Par. 2.1 b) Appendix C , F-C3441 Par. 4.0 c) F-C 3441, Fig. 3 d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3
- 4. FSAR Table 9.4-2, Fig. 9.4-2 12-B 5/20/83
SCEk'S No. 12-B 1983 TER No. _ 2 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEk' Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEk' sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised ) New
SCEWS Mo. 12-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 12-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not coplicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 156 and 157. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items. FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-OlB. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. l l
~
bCIE .s Unit:, , . Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORV. SHEET Dockit:3,50-336 ENVIRONMENT Note 1 DOCUMENTATION RE** QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating 4 Sequential Plant-ID No.: SI653, Time continuous continuous 3.) SI654, SI655, SI656 Test l Z* Component: Valve Motor Temperature l 112 F max. Profile 12 Simultaneous j Operators (oF) A 3.d) Test Manufacture: Pressure Limitorque (p373) 2. 3 Profile 12 3 Simultaneous 3.d) Test SMB-00 S/N $08f [d83,134085, Relative Humidity (%) '{ Simultaneour Function: 134228 100 100 3.a) T st Operators for S1653, ' Chemical SI654, S1655, SI656 Spray NA NA NA NA NA
$o$$kt! ired Radiation 8 3*33x106R 2.04x10 R Uti hYtimp Discharge C,L Sequential 3.c) Test Aux. Bldg. EL g9 i "9 Plant
%fDNP.fn Simulated Design Sequential Note 2 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-780 1. SI653, SI654 must function in a radiation
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 (only) environment.
- 3. Limitorque Test Report B0003 11/13/74 to 1/23/75 2. ZONE a) Par. 2.1.1 SI 653 A3 b) Par. 5.0 SI 654 A3 c) Par. 2.3 SI 655 A2 d) Fig. 1 SI 656 A2 e) Par. 2.1.3 5/20/83
- 4. FSAR Fig. 6.1-1 13-B c
SCEWS No. 13-B 1983 TER No. _ 4 Late: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT EhTIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIER Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sum =ary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category 11.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. i N/A V) .7ustification for continued operation. N/A J Reaffirmed Revised l New
SCEWS No. 13-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 13-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page Sf, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this inforration via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. ~ ~ ~ 2 - Class B. 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheet 36, 37, 63, and 65. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. Ta addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal, Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the Flant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program. I f f
Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMEin'AT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING
* ^* Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
System: Aux. Feedwater Operating Continuous Continuous S*9"*"'I"I Plant ID No.: Time Note 1 3.) Test HV5276 HV5275 Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Simultaneous. Operators ( F) Profile 22 Profile 12 3, n 3.d) Test ! Manufacture: Pressure Limitorque (PSIA) H Profile 12 2. Simultaneou A 3.d) Test l l Model Number: SMB-00 Relative 1. , 2 . Simultaneous S/N146658, 146659 Humidity (%) 100 100 A 3.a) Test Function: Operators for FW-43A, FW-43B Chemical i Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation g Sequential Aux. Feedwater NA 2.04x10 R NA 3.c) Test Isolation Location: Aging Plant Turbine Bldg. EL. Simulated Design Seluential 14'6" Zone 210 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. Must be continually operated in a throttle
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-407 mode to control steam generator level.
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17
- 3. Limitorque Test Report B0003 11/13/74 to 1/23/75 a) Par. 2.1.1 b) Par. 5.0
'c) Par. 2.3 d) Fig. 1 e) Par. 2.1. 3 , 2.2.1 5/20/83 14-B
SCEk'S No. _ 14-B 1983 TER No. __ 14 . Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITICATION SER/TER REVIEL' Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sum =ary of new information on SCEk' sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualified life not adequately addressed. Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed l Revised New _ _ - _ . . _ _ - _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ ______________-__n
SCEWS No. 14-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model .';mber is included on SCEWS 14-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E 3ulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. . 2 - Class B. 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the OcteSer, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheet 115. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal, Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the fiant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program.
m Unita Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockota 50-336 ENVIROmiENT Note 1 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating #9"#" # Continuous Continuous Test Plant ID No.: Time 4. 3.) SI662, SI663 - 2. Component: Valve Motor Temperature Operators (0p) ll10 F max. Profile 13 Simultaneous q 3 3.c) Test Manufacture: Pressure
- 2. Simultaneous (PSIA) H Test Limitorque Profile 13 3 3.c) 1., 2.
Model Number: SMD-00 Relativ 100 simultaneous S/N 168874, 168875 Humidity (%) 100 A Function: Operators for 3.d) Test SI662, SI663 = Chemical NA NA NA NA NA Spray l Accuracy: Not Requ ired l Service: Radiation 3.33x106R 2x108R C,L Sequential Shutdown Heat Exchanger to HPSI Suction 3.a) Test Location: Aging Aux. Blds:. EL (,) 45,6,, Plant Sequential Zone A3(SI662) 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 3.b) Test Zone A2((SI663) Life Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level Yes Suhnergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223D 1. These components must function in a radiation (only)
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 envir nment.
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4-26-72 to 8-30-72 a) Par. 2.1
,b) Appendix C F-C3441 Par. 4.0 c) F-C 3441, Fig. 3 d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3
- 4. FSAR Fig. 6.1-1 15-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 15-B 3 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A ! V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 15-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 15-B see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional informatinn (DFA1) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - Na motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 38 and 64. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal :nd Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I6E Bulletin 79-OlB. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ \
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT Note 2 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Safety Injection Operating Time Continuous Continuous Test Plast ID No.: l SI411, SI412 l Component: Valve Motor Temperature Operators ( F) NA Manufacture: Pressure Limitorque (PSIA) NA ( Model Number: SMB-00 Relative i S/N 145934, 145933 Humidity (%) Function: Operators for NA SI411, SI412 ' Chemical Spray Accuracy: NA Not Required Service: Radiation HPSI Pump Suction 5.13x105R 2.04x108 C 5. Sequential Note 1. Test Location: Aging Aux. Bldg. EL (-) Simulated Plant Sequential 45'6" Zone A4 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 4.a) Test Life Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1) Report 600376A applies to Radiation
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-:c23B Qualification Per Limitorque Telex
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 12/17/79
- 4. Limitorque Test Report 600198 1/2/69 to 4/29/69
- 2) Valves must function in a radiation (only) a) Page 5 environment.
b) Page 4 5 Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4/26/72 to 8/30/72 Par. 2.1
- 6. FSAR Fig. 6 1-1 5/20/83 16-B
SCEWS No. 16-B 1983 TER No. g Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II. C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualified life not adequately addressed. Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New I l l
SCEWS No. 16-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 16-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - H. K. Porter 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 60 and 61. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. l
bGBLOJ u - Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATI N REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , Sequential System: Main Steam Operating Continuous Continuous 3.) M Time Note 2 Plant ID No.: HV4218 Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operator ( F) Profile 20 Profile 13 A, D Simultaneous 3.c) Test i Manufacture: Pressure 2. Limitorque (PSIA) Note 1 Profile 13 A Simultaneous 3.c) Test Model Number: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S/N 156211 Humidity (%) 100 100 A simultaneous Function: 3.d) Test Operator for MS-65A ' chemical i Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Steam Gen. No. 1 Radiation Sequential Main Steam Isolation NA 2.04x108R NA 3.a) Test Bypass Location: Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant Sequential EL 38'6" West Valve Rm. 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 3.b) Test Zone A50 Life Flood Level Elev Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 1. The peak pressure environment is 1.6 psig
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4-26-72 to 8-30-72 for a duration of about 13 seconds.
a) Par. 2.1 7. Used only during startup to warm turbine plant, b) Appendix C , F-C3440 Par. 4.0 If it were open during a main steam line break c) F-C 3441, Fig. 3 outside the containment it would receive a MSIS d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 and must close and stay closed. e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3 & 600376A Par. 3.1.2 17-B 5/20/83
~
SCEWS No. 17-B 1983 TER No. 12 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualified life not adequately addressed Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. V) Justification for continued operation. j Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No.17-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 17-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated - - January 6. 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 177. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. E) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-OlB. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. F I _____ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ A
leasS* Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SrIEET Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTA ION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING MET!!OD ITEMS I Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ Syste:n: Main Steam Operating Sequential Plant ID No.: HV4191 Time Continuous Continuous Note 2 3.) Test Component: Valve Motor Temperaturc 2. ( Operator ( F) Profile 20 Profile 13 A,o Simultaneous l 3.c) Test j Manufacture: Pressure 2. l Limitorque (PSIA) Note 1 Profile 13 A Simultaneous 3.c) Test Model Number: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S/N 155207 flumidity(s) 100 100 A Simultaneous Function: 3.d) Test Operator for MS-201 Chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation Sequential 8 Steam Gen. No. 1 to NA 2.04x10 R NA 3.a) Test Aux. Feedwater Turbine Location: Encl. Bldg. Aging Plant sequential EL-38'6" West Valve Rm. Zone A50 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 3.b) Test Life Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A 1. The peak presssure environment is 1.6 psig
- 2. FSAR AMmendment 17 f r a duration of about 13 seconds.
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4-26-72 to 8-30-72 . Must operate intermittently to supply steam a) Par. 2.1 to the aux. feed pump terry turbine.
b) Appendix C, F-C3440 Par. 4.0 c) F-C 3441, Fig. 3 d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3 e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3 & 600376A Par. 3.1.2 18-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 18-B 1983 TER No. 12 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Categocy II. C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Oualified life not adequately addressed Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A
'V) Justification for continued operation.
N/A Reaffirmed i Revised New
SCEWS No. 18-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 18-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not requent this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October,1980 submittal, Appendix 1, sheet 180. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation. Thermal and Machanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I6E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982. I L
tA h Unit 8 Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET l Dockote 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIROFMENT DOCUME!1TATIQi REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Main Steam Operating Sequential s hhms Plant ID No.: IIV4222 Time Note 2 3.) Test Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Operator (OF) Profile 20 Profile 13 A, o Simultaneous 3.c) Test Manufacture: Pressure 4. Limitorque (PSIA) Note 1 Profile 13 3 Simultaneous 3.c) Test , l Model Number: SMB-000 Relative 1., 2. S/N 156212 Humidity (%) 100 100 A Simultaneous Function: 3.d) Test Operator For Ms-65B ' Chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA l l Accuracy: Not Required l Service: Radiation Sequential Steam Generator No. 2 2.04x108R 3.a) NA NA Test Main Steam Isolation Location: Bypass Aging Encl. Bldg. EL-38'6" Plant Sequential East Valve Rm. Zone A51 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Design 3.b) Test Life 1 i Flood Level Elev: $ Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn )
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- l. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M0223A
- 1. The peak pressure environment is 1.8 psig for
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 i
- 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4-26-72 to 8-30-72 " f l d a) Par. 2.1
- 2. Us nly dud r up to w b W u # m If it were open during a main steam line break b) Appendix C , F-C3440 Par. 4.0 i outside the containment it would receive a MSIS I d) -C 41 r. 3.2, Page 3-3 and must close and stay closed.
e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3 & 600376A Par. 3.1.2 19-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 19-B 1983 TER No. 12 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Nd11 stone Unit 2 vocket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualified life not adequately addressed Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New (
--- -- - - - - - - l
SCENS No. 19-B 5/20/83 ! III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 19-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable l 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 178. l 8 - Not applicable i 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. f Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque l Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I6E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC REAI dated January 6, 1982, i l l l. II
-. - e -~ e - -*sv- -
TLBS - Units Two SYSTEM COMPONE'NT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMEI AT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ , System: Main Steam Operating Sequential Time C ntimous Contimous Note 2 Plant ID No.: HV4189 3.) Test Component: Valve Motor Temperature 2. Simultaneous Operator ( F) Profile 21 Profile 13 A, D Test 3.c) Manufacture: Pressure 2. Limitorque (PSIA) Note 1 Profile 13 A Simultaneous 3.c) Test Model Number: SME-000 Relative 1.,2. Simultaneous S/N 156208 Hmmidity(%) 100 100 A Test Function: Operator 3.d) for MS-202 ' chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Steam Cen. No.2 Radiation Sequential to Aux. Feedwater Turbine NA 2.04x10 8R NA 3.a) Test Iocation: Aging Plant Encl. Bldg. EL 38'6" Design Sequential East Valve Rm. Zone A51 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 3.b) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 1. The peak pressure environment is 1.8 psig i 3. Limitorque Test Report 600376A 4-26-72 to 8-30-72 for a duration of about 13 seconds.
a) Par. 2.1 2. Must operate intermittently to supply steam to b) Appendix C, F-C3440 Par. 4.0 the aux. feed pump terry turbine. c) F-C 3441 Fig. 3 . d) F-C 3441, Par. 3.2, Page 3-3
; e) F-C 3441, Par. 3.3.3 & 600376A Par. 3.1.2 20-B 5/20/83
SCE'a'S No. 20-B 1983 TER No. _ 13 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sumnary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.C Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualified life not adequately addressed Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 20-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 20-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page Sf, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheet 179. 8 - Not applicable , 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC shculd note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. I B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-OlB. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6,1982. l J Ali
,le
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT Note 2 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ . Sequential Systems Containment Spray Operating Continu- Continuous Note 1. 2.,4.a) Test Plant ID No.: P-43A, Tune ous 5 days (Note 3.) P-43B Component: 4160V Temperature NA NA NA NA NA Pump Motor ( F) Manufacture: General Pressur NA NA NA NA NA Electric Company (PSIA) Model Number: S/N Relative NA NA NA 8381499, 8381500 Humidity (%) NA NA Function: Develop Containment ' Chemical Spray Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation Sequential Containment Spray 8.67x10 5R 1 x 106 R C,L 2.,4.b),3. Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL-45'6" 40 yrs. 40 yrs, l. 2.,4.c) Sequential Zone A2(MP43A) A3(MP43B) Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence un
- Documentation
References:
. Notes: 1. FSAR Fig. 14.16-6. CS pumps are used to control
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-E-10, 7604-M-53.
- 2. C.E. Ltr. O. A. Berquist to R.J. DeRosa, 9-22-80. containmgntpressure. Containment pressure is at 0 psig after 10 sec.(ll.6 days).
- 3. NUSCO memo, R.J. DeRosa to file, GEE-80-746,10-10-80. 2. Pumps are subject to radiation (only) environment.
- 4. G.E. Topical Report, IEEE 323, Dec., 1978. 3. A load test for this qualification was not conducted.
a) Section IV, Page 19 b) Section III, Page 6 Qualification based on no load test of similar motor. c) Summary Par. a), Page iii 21-B 11-1-80
4 - SCEWS No. 21-B 1983 TER No. __ 88 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A 88Ponse: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established
Response
Reference 2 on SCEWS 21-B already addresses and resolves FRC concern regarding low radiation thresholds of "Micamati" binder. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
--- p -
g - - - -
-e- , .- m.,e.-m
~ '^ .
4 Unit: Two SYSTEM COMP h T EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst 336 ENVIPDNMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS METHOD Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Engr. Safeguard Continu- Continu-System: Room Air Recirc. Operating ous ous 1. 3.a) sequential Plant ID No.: F-15A F-15B Time test Component: 460V Fan Motor Temperature 2. ( F) 111 F peak 250 C 3 3.b) sequential test Manufacture: Pressure Z. Joy Mfg. Co. (PSIA) H H A H H (Reliance Electric Co. , Motor)
- )$odel Number
- 38-26.5-1170, Relative 1., 2.
1 SN-GF-15747 Motor No." Humidity (%) 100 100 3 3.c) sequential I Function:600277-14 test . Fan Drive ' Chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA
- Accuracy
- Not Required i Service
- Engr. Sfgd. Room Radiation 8.60x106R 2.04x108R se@ endal Air Recirculation Fan test
- C,L 3.d)
Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs. sequential EL(-)45'6 Zone A2(MF15A). #"
- at 174.8 C test Zone A3(MF15B) 1. 3.e)
, Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un 1 l
- Documentation
References:
Notes: j 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-507 e 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 j 3. Reliance Electric Co. Summary Report i NUC. 9, July 1, 1975 a) page 15 c) page 6
- 1) page 5 d) page 14 e) page 21 23-B 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 23-B 1983 TER No. __ 89 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A _
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established
Response
Documentation of similarity is available for audit in accordance with I&E B-79-OlB. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. None V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
m .. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION 9 Qual. Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. System: CTMT & EB VENT Operating Sequentia! P 6 years P la,2 Ten Plcnt ID No.: HV 8306 Time HV8312 Component: Motor Operator Temperature ( F) Manufacture: Pressure Raymond Controls (PSIA) Model Number: Relative MN0-9-30-500 numidity(t) Function: Damper Motor 0pe ra tor Chemical Spray Accuracy: N/A Service: Engineered Radiation Sequential Safeguards Room Damper 6 2.29 x 10 F. 1 x 10 7R C,L lb Test Incation: Aux B1dg A2 Aging Elev (-) 45'6" 40 years 6 years PDL la, 2 Sequential Test see note 2 Flood Level Elev: N/A Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un '
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. This component is subject to a harsh
- 1. Wyle Test Report #44235-2 radiation environment only,
- a. Page \711-1, 2, 3 and 4 -
- 2. Test anomalies indicate the following
- b. Page lll-1, Appendix 1 maintance schedule.
Seals . ... . . . . . . 6 years
- 2. Memo to file GEE-82-350 Limitswitches . . . .. . . 6 years 24-8 5-1-82
SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Units Two Dock;t: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS EE Sheet 29(MP41A) Qual. 31(MP41B) 30(MP41C) Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. 180 Days-Operating Post Acc., 8320 hrs. System: Safety Injection Time 100 Hrs /Yr. Plant ID No.: P-41A' Testing 3. 4. Analysis P-41B, P-41C Component: 4160V Temperature op 2. Safety Injection ( F) 110.5 F A 4., Note 1. Analysis Pump Motors Pressure 2. Manufacture: 0.5 psig H H Analysis Siemens-Allis (PSIA) Relative 1., 2. Model Number: Motor S/N 00 4., Note 2. Malysis 8-5112-90191-1-2, 8-5112- Humidity (%) A f Function: 90191-1-3, 8-5112-90191-1-1 ' Chemical NA NA NA NA NA Pump Drive Spray Accuracy: Not Required Service: Radiation Sequential High Pressure 3.12x10 6R 2 x 10 8R C,L 4. Tests Safety Injection Incation: EL-(-)45'6" Aging 1- Analysis Zone A2(MP41A) A4(MP41B) 40 yrs. 40 yrs 5 A5(MP41C) (Note 3) Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. The motors were designed for an ambient of
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-761 only 0.5 F less than the spec. requirement. This (Combustion Engineering Spec. No. 18767-PE-410) difference is insignificant especially since the avail-
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 able data indicates the operating temp. rise is well
- 3. NUSCO memo, R.M. Kacich to R. DeRosa, below rated.
NEE-80-L-350 dated 8-7-80. 2. Insulation is class B, non-hygroscopic.
- 4. Siemen's-Allis inter-office correspondence 3. Motor surveillance intensified in Plant Perventive dated October 8,1980. (revised October 16, 1980) Maintenance Program.
- 5. Wyle Report 17436-2, Rev. A dated 2-27-81 25-B 8-21-81
SCEWS No. 25-B 1983 TER No. 90 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A -
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . . - _ . _ _ _ . - ~ _ .___ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - ___
SCEWS No. 25-B 1983 TER No. 90 8/18/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: The motor was purchased prior to issuance of IEEE Standard 323-1971 and testing requirements were not required to that standard. Records available at the vendor indicate that the motor was constructed in accordance with the Combustion Engineering specification and that the insulation used is Class B, Non-Hygroscopic. The analysis was conducted on the material list supplied by the vendor for this class of motor. Detailed records were not retained to trace every constituant to the mine, as it was not required at that time. The unknown constituants are for portions of the insulation system only required for construction or detectable by periodic inspection. As stated in response to the 1981 TER this equipment will be incorporated into the plant surveillance and preventive maintenance program.
Ffcll ts L;1QDJMonh. . SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit: Two Dockst: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS EE Sheet 32(MP42A) $g 33(MP42B) Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. 8 " 6 Hrs. Post System: Safety Injection Operating h[j?fr 40,006 hrs 8 ** Time Testing ' Note 2. 3. Analysis Plant ID No.: P-42A, 2Y P-42B Temperature 2. gg Component: 4160V E" ( F) 111 F max. 110.5 F A 3., Note 1. Analysis Safety Injection Pump $E Motors g2 Pressure 2. Manufacture: H H Analysis r $. (PSIA) 0.5 psig Siemens-Allis A SC 2E mo Model Number: Motor S/N Relative 1., 2. Analysis E* 8-5717-90191-2-2, 8-5117- Humidity (%) 100 100 3 3., Note 3. mg Function: 90191-2-1 y, oe Pump Drive ' Chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA }g an Accuracy: Not Required
*E Radiation Sequential $
Service: Low Pressure Safety Injection 4.1x106R 2 x 108 R C,L 3. Test h o. W Location: Aux. BIdg. Aging 40 yrs. 40 yrs. 1- 0 ^"" * " EL.(-)45'6" Zone A2(MP42A) Note 4. A3(MP42B) Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. The motors were designed for an ambient of only
- 1. Bechtel Techaical Spec. 7604-M-762 0.58 F less than the spec. requirement. This difference is (Combustion Engineering Spec. No. 18767-PE-410) insignificant especially since the available data indicates
- 2. FSAR Ammendment 17 the operating temp. rise is well below rated.
- 3. Sieman's-Allis inter-office correspondence 2. FSAR Sec. 6.2.3.1. Sump recirc. can start as early as 44 dated G:tober 8, 1980. (revised October 16, 1980) ninutes into an accident for a large break. 6 Hrs. is
- 4. Wyle Report 17436-2, Rev. A dated 2-27-81 estimated for smaller breaks. Pumps will not be subjected to a harsh environment until plant goes into recirc.
- 3. Insulation is class B, non-hygroscopic.
26-B G-21-81
SCEWS No. 26-B 91 1983 TER No. __ Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A ,
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment Qualification not established
**E ""* See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule.
N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 26-B 1983 TER No. 91 8/18/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: The motor was purchased prior to issuance of IEEE Standard 323-1971 and testing requirements were not required to that standard. Records available at the vendor indicate that the motor was constructed in accordance with the Combustion Engineering specification and that the insulation used is Class B, Non-Hygroscopic. The analysis was conducted on the material list supplied by the vendor for this class of motor. Detailed records were not retained to trace every constituant to the mine, as it was not required at that time. The unknown constituants are for portions of the insulation system only required for construction or detectable by periodic inspection. As stated in response to the 1981 TER this equipment will be incorporated into the plant surveillance and preventive maintenance program.
Dockit: 50 45 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF# QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METIIOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Contin- Sequential System: Operating Contin- uously Test Plant ID No.: MPllA, Time uously 5 days Note 2. 3.,4.a) (Note 1.) MPllB, MPllC Component: RBCCW Temperature
' Pump Motors ( F) A,2 DMN 110 F max. 140 F 3.,5.
Manufacture: Pressure General Electric Co. (PSIA) II H A,2 11 11 Modal Number: SK818847A129 Relative 100 100 1. 3.,5. TEST OF S/N's LG8381496,7,8 IIumidity (%) SIMILAR Function: RBCCW T)FRTCN Pump Drives Chemical Spray NA NA NA NA NA Accuracy: Not Required Service: 4000V Radiation NA NA NA NA NA Location: Aux. Bldg. ^9 1D9 Sequential El. (-)25' 6" 40 yrs. 40 yrs. 1. 3.,4.b) Test Zone AlB FloM Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. A load test for this qualification was not
- 1. Bechtel Spec. 7604-E-10, 7604-M-41A. conducted. Qualification is based on no load test
- 2. FSAR Araendment 17. of similar motor.
- 3. G.E. Ltr. 0. A. Berquist to R.J. DeRosa, dated 2. Must operate continuously until maintenance can be per-Oct. 10, 1980 on RBCCW pump motors. formed on alternate pumps to supply cooling water to
- 4. G.E. Topical Report,IEEE 323 Dec 1978 safety related components.
a) Section IV. Page 19 b) Summar.,y Par. a), Page 111
- 5. G.E. Ltr. 0.A. Berquist to R.J. DeRosa on containment spray pump motors, Nov. 15, 1979 29-B 3-21-81
SCEWS No. 30B, 31B 1983 TER No. _ 87, None i Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEW Sheets 30B and 31B are deleted. Equipment has been encapsulated and provided with HVAC such that it is now located in a mild environment. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualification not established
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
i SCEWS No. 30B, 31B l ! 5/20/83 l l III. TER Concern Response Motor Control Centers previously noted on SCEWS 30-B and 31-B have now been encapsulated as previously committed. Each encapsulation l is provided with non-Category 1E HVAC which maintains normal ! temperatures throughout the life of the MCC's. Temperature extremes calculated within the enclosures, assuming HVAC failure, are reached gradually and are within the design limits of the Motor Control Centers. Temperature sensors are installed within each cubicle l which will alarm in the main control room upon elevated enclosure temperature. These Motor Control Centers are now located in a mild environment. l l l l l
Fccility: milstona Nucit;r Pr. Sta. Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockat: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-Syctem: Main Steam Operating neous Plant ID No.: PV 1223, Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test PV4224. Component: Solenoid Temperature Simulta-Valve (OF) 324 F Profile Profile neous 10 20, A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 1.6 psig Profile A 1.b) neous 10 Test Modal Number: Relative Simulta-NP-206-381-6F Humidity (%) 100 ^ 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot Valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S grice: Continuous Radiation
#19 #2 Atmospheric Dumps Sequential N/A 2 x 108 R N/A 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Dldg. Aging EL. 36'6" Zone A50(PV4223) 2 Sequential A51(PV4224) 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 35-B 5/20/83
./
Facility: ..lls. ton 2 Nucin"x Pr. Sta. Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Operating Continuous See summary Sy .: tem: Main Steam Pltnt ID No.: Time sheet 36Ba PT 4223, Component: Temperature g See summary Pressure transmitter ( F) 324 F 185 F Profile 1 sheet 21, A 36B Manufacture: GE/MAC Pressure See summary (PSIA) 1.6 psig A sheet 36B Modal Number: 551 Relative See summary Humidity (%) 100% 100% A 2 sheet 36B Function: Initiating sig-
- nal for steam generator Chemical atmospheric dump Spray Accuracy: N/A Ssrvice: Steam Radiation Generator Pressure N/A Incation: Aur.. Bldg. Aging See summary EL. 36'6" Zone A50 40 Years P.D.L. sheet 36B Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. GE instruction 198-4532K11-001A
- 2. Not affected by exposure to MIL-E-5272 humidity test (24 hr. cycle, 680F to 150 F at 100% relative humidity).
36-B 1
4
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 36B, 36Ba SCEW SHEET NO. 36B, 36Ba Rev. 2 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: STEAM GENERATOR PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS PT-4223, 4224 MANUFACTURER: . GENERAL ELECTRIC MEASUREMENT AND CONTROLS (GE/MAC) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: This equipment is discrepant because it lacks documented qualification test data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components provide control loop input for automatic operation of the atmospheric dump valves. This subject was also discussed in the October 5, 1979 letter from W. G. Counsil to H. R. Denton. To date the staff has not responded negatively to this letter, thereby inferring concurrence with the conclusions presented therein. With the postulation of the most adverse failure of these components there is no effect upon the control room manual operation of the atmospheric dump. .. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. ve . b
SCEWS No. 36-B 1983 TER No. _ 48 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW NE11 stone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification. Response: Justification for continued operation reviewed and remains valid. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
EAf Pr. Sta. Units Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Sy; tem: Main Steam Operating Continuous See sunmary Time sheet Plant ID No.: PT-4224 36B see summary Component: Temperature 326 F Profile ( F) sheet 36Ba Pressure transmitter 185 F 20, A 1 Pressure See summary Manufacture: GE/MAC (PSIA) 18 Psig A sheet 36Ba Mod 1 Number: 551 Relative See summary Humidity (%) 100% 100% A 2 sheet 36Ba , Function: Initiating sig-nal for steam generator ~ Chemical atmospheric dump SprayN /A Accuracy: S:rvice: Steam Radiation
- Generator pressure e N/A j Incntion: Aux. Bldg. Aging See summary 3 Elev. 36' 6 40 Years P.D.L. sheet 36Ba q Zone A51
- i.
Flood Level Elev: 2 Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Mn
' Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. GE instruction 198-4532KIL-001A
- 2. Not affected by exposure to MIL-E-5272 humidity test (24 hr. cycle, 68 F to 150 F I at 100% relative humidity). I
?
I 1 36-Ba 11-1-80 ' l
SCEWS No. 36-Ba 1983 TER No. 48 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sumnary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) S R concerns
- Equipment in NRC Category I.B _
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualificacion pending modification
Response
Justification for continued operation reviewed and remains valid. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
F;cility: m ilstono Nuclur Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: M81" St*8" Operating P continuous P 1 T Plant ID No.: Various > Time component: Temperatur P file Pmf& Si d ae m F) 10 A 1 Solenoid operated valve 21 Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simultaneou ; (PSIA) 1.6 psig Prof 12e y 10 Model Number: Relative Simultaneou.; NP8316E35E Ilumidity(%) 100 100 1 Function: Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Spray Accuracy: NA N/A S rvice: Main steam Radiation isolation trip valve N/A pilot operator Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. 36'6" 40 Years 40 years P.D.L. 2 Zone A50 Sequential Test Flood Level Elev: N/A Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence na
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B HY-4217 Al
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. O HY-4217 B1 IlY-4221 Al llY-4221 B1 40-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 40-B 1983 TER No. _ 21 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Suimnary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 40-B revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns:
~
Response
N/A III) TER concerns: N/A
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed N/A Revised New
Facility: .110 tine Nuclear Pr. Sta. Units Two , SYSTFM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS
~
Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simultaneou i System: Main Steam Operating P continuous P 1 Test Plant ID No. : Various Time Component solen id Temperature Profile Profile A 1 Simultaneous operated valves (OF) 20 10 Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simultaneous Profile 1 (PSIA) 1.8 psig A Test 10 Model Number: Relative 100 Simultaneous NP8316E35E Humidity (%) 100 1 Function: Pilot solenoid valve ~ Chemical i Spray Accuracy: N/A N/A Service: Main steam Radiation isolation trip valve N/A pilot operator Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 years Sequential El. 36' 6" 40 Years p.p.L. 2 Zone A51 Test Flood Level Elev: N/A - Above Flood Level: Yes Sulxnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: HY-4217 A2
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B HY-4217 B2
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 HY-4221 A2 HY-4221 B2 40- Ba 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 40-Ba 1983 TER No. _ 24 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sutmnary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 40-Ba revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns:
Response
N/A III) TER concerns:
Response
N/A IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation.
!^
Reaffirmed Revised New w-- -,,
Facility .allLtone Nuclc r Pr. St2. Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;ts 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Safety Injection Simulta-Sy tem: & Ctat. Spray Operating neous Plant ID No.: Time' Contiunous 1.a) P P Test HY-306 - L- Component: Temperature Simulta-Solenoid valve >' ') lll F Profile 3 1.b) neous 10 Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.5 psig Profile A, H 1.b) neous 10 Test Modsl Number: Relative ^ Simulta-NP-8320A177E Humidity (%) 100% 100 1.c) neous Function: Pilot Test solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test
. Irvice: Control shutdown Radiation Sequential cooling flow Bypass 2 x 108 R 2.29xln6a C, L 1.e) Test Locntion: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-) 45'6" Sequential LPSI Pump Room Zone A-2 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level Yes Suhnergence Nn 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: This component subject to radiation (only)
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 43-B 5/20/83
Facility: .allLtone Nucir_r Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockit: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-System: Feedwater Operating neous Pltnt ID No.: Time HY-5419, P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: 5421 Temperature 324 F Simulta-g (op) neous solenoid valve 10 21, A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 1.6 psig Profile Note 1 1.b) neous 10 Test Model Number: Relative "" #~ 100% A NP-8320A183E Humidity (%) 100 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve Chemical i Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S rvice: Continuous Radiation Sequential N/A 2 x 108 R N/A 1.e) Test Loc tion: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. 36'6" Sequential Zone A-50 2 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B 1. The environmental pressure is less than 2 PSIG a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 for a duration of about 13 seconds. This is c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 considered insignificant.
e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 46-B 5/20/83
vsRQDRy: i M C 8learTiu. E O. Units Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALbATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS , ._ Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. _ ,
"" #~
Syr, tem: Feedwater Operating " Plant ID No.: HY-5420, Time P CWes P M Tes Component: Solenoid Temperature Simulta-Valve ( F) 326 F Profile Profile neous 10 20, A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 1.8 psig Profile No.te 1 neous 10 1.b) Test Mod 31 Number: Relative loos 100 A 1.c) Simulta-NP-8320A183E Humidity (%) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve ' Chemical . Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S rvice: Continuous Radiation Sequential N/A 2 x 108 R N/A 1.e) Test Inc; tion: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. 36' 6" Sequential Zone A-51 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation Neferences* Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B 1. The environmental pressure is less than a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 2 PSIG for about 13 seconds. This is c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 considered insignificant.
e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 46 Ba 5/20/83
Facility: rullstone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Safety Injection Simulta-System: & Ctat. Spray Operating neous Plant ID No.: Time P Continuout P 1.a) Test HY-657 Component: Temperature Simulta-A neous Solenoid valve ( F) 111 y Profile 10 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressur 0.5 psig A, H Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 10 1.b) Test Modal Number: Relative 100% 'g
~
NP-8320A177E Humidity (%) 100 1.c) neous Function: Pilot solenoid Test valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA NA B NA 1.d) Test Service: Continuous Radiation Sequential 2.38x106R 8 2 x 10 R C,L 1.e) Test Incr. tion : Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-)45'6" Sequential LPSI Pump Room Zone A-2 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Abova Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
' Documentation
References:
Notes: This component subject to radiation (only)
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 47-B 5/20/83
-m w-SYSTEM COMPONENT EhwUATION WORK SHEET Units Two Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTAT ON REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS METHOD Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Syr, tem: S/G Blowdown Operating Sequential Plcnt ID No.: Time Continuous Continuous P 1 Test ZS-4246, 4248 Component: Limit switch Temperature Simulta-( F) 1120F A ne us Profile 7 1.a) Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) neous 0.6 psig Profile 7 A,H 1.a) Test Mod 31 Number: Relative Simulta-EA740-20100 Humidity (%) ne us 100% A Function: Position 00 1.M Test Indication & Valve Chemical Simulta-Control Spray neous Accuracy: N/A NA Note 2 NA 1.c) Test S::rvice: g/GB1wdown Radiation C Sequential isolation valv 8.41x10 5R 2.04x108R 1.b) Test Locntion: Aging 40 yrs. Test & Gasket reple cement Aux. Bldg. 40 yrs. except P.D.L. 2 Analysis required El. (-) 5' 0" Zone A17 gasket every 7 yrs. ( 7_yre -) Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: 1.This component is subject to a radiation (only)
- 1. Vendor qual. report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 environment.
a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 b) Page 4 of 12 2. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium c) Page 8 of 12 thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide, PH between
- 2. NAMCO Qualification Test Report QTR-111 dated 10 & 11 (3000 PPM Boron).
10/1/81 49-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. . 1983 TER No. 66 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 4 Docket No. 50-336
, 1) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
Revised qualification reference for the parameter " Aging". II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concernst Equipment Qualification pending modification.
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
,-y- a-- -g- , - , _ . . a. ,,v-- -_
p- --c~.
-.r-e- ,, -g , , .-----
SCEWS No. 49-B 5/20/83 III)' Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. 'Ihe switches listed on SCEW Sheet 49-B is only required to be operable in mild and harsh radiological environments. Teflon taped seal is not required.
'2. SCEW Sheet 49-B is revised to reflect new qualification reference for aging.
- 3. FRC did not review the report referenced in the C of C for the l EA740 switches, as stated in Note 3 of Item 64, Page Sg. The report listed by FRC on Page Sa and used in the evaluation on 4
Pages Sa-g, Item 64 is not the report referenced on SCEWS 49-B. (For all parameters with the exception of aging) See 2 above for aging qualification reference.
- 4. Operability times are referenced.
t f i I 6 e
F.ccility: 2nlictone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION MEDIOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-Sy: tem: Main Steam Operating neous Plr.nt ID No.: Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test IIY-4246, 4248 Component: Temperature Simulta-ll20 F Solenoid valve ( F) Profile A neous 10 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.6 psig Profile A, 11 neous 10 1.b) Test Mods 1 Number: Relative 100% 100 A 1.c) Simulta-NP-831655E Humidity (%) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve ~ Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N.A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Continuous Radiation Sequential 1.94x106R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Test Incr. tion : Aux. Bldg. Aging .. EL. (-) 5'0" East 2 Sequential Piping penetration room 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test is Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Nn 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: These components are subject to a radiation
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR-67368/Rev. 0 50-B 5/20/83
.e111ty: hill: tone Nuclc r Pr. Sta.
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock:t 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Syltem: Chem & volume Cnt] . Operating Sequential Plc.nt ID No.: ZS-2525 Time Continuous Continuous C 1 Test Component: Limit switch Temperature o Simulta-FF) 112 F Profile 7 A 1.a) neous Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.6 psig Profile 7 A, H 1.a) reous Test Modal Number: Relative 100% 100 A 1.b) Simulta-EA180-11302 Humidity (%) neous Function: Test Position indication Chemical Simulta-
& valve control Spray neous Accuracy: NA NA Note 2 NA 1.c) Test S:rvice: Limit swtich Radiation Sequential 1.64x10 6R 2.04x108R C,L 1.b) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs. Test & Gasket replacement piping penetration room 40 yrs. P.D.L. 2 Analysis required except Zone A-18 .
gasket (2yra) every 2 yrs. Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. This component is subject to a radiation
- 1. Vendor qual. report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 (only) environment.
a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 b) Page 4 of 12 2. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium c) Page 8 of 12 thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide, PH between
- 2. Wyle Report 17436-3 10 & 11 (3000 PPM Boron).
51-B 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 51-B 67 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment is NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment Oualification pending modification
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 51-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. Switch listed on SCEW Sheet 51-B is only required to be operable in mild and harsh radiological environments. Teflon taped seal is not required.
- 2. Aging Analysis was accomplished by Wyle utilizing activation energies and other data documented in their data files. FRC apparently did not review NNECO response to SER wherein it was documented that preventive maintenance and surveillance will periodically monitor this equipment. PM on equipment does not indicate that equipment modification is required.
- 3. NNECO takes exception to Note 3 on Page 5g of Item No. 63 of the TER. NNECO provided the C of C for NAMCO EA180 series switches, which reference the proper test report. The C of C does not reference the document listed on Page Sa, Item 63 of the TER as indicated by FRC. Their review should be done utilizing the proper reports which have been previously furnished to FRC. The Qualification Summary provided by Wyle is used solely for aging parameter as noted on SCEW Sheet 51-B.
- 4. Operability times are referenced.
FIcility: n111Ltone Nucitar Pr. Sta. Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock:t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-System: Chem & Volume Cnti operating neous Pltnt ID No.: IIY-2525 Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test Mmuna-Component: Temperature o ( F) 112 F Profile A neous Solenoid valve 10 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-0.6 psig A, H (P,SIA) g 10 1.b) Test Modal Number: Relative Simulta-NP-8320A185E !!umidity(%) 100% 100 A 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Continuous Radiation Sequential 1.64x106R 2 x 10 8 R C,L 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-) 5 ' 0" We st Sequential piping penetration roon; 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Zone A-18 Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: This component is subject to a radiation 1, ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B (only) environment. a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D 2L. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 52-B 5/20/S3
F cility: n111cton] Nucir.r Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-Sy: tem: RBCCW Operating os Plc.nt ID No.: HY-6731 Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: Temperature Simulta-111,F neous Solenoid valve ( F) Profile A 10 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.5 psig Profile A, H neous 10 1.b) Test . Model Number: Relative Simulta-NP8320A-189E Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Snrvice: Continuous Radiation Sequential 8.59x10 6R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-) 4 5 ' 6" 2 Sequential LPSI Pump Room Zone A-2 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: This component is subject to a radiation
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 53-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 53-B 25 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number Added Qualification Reference and Revised Qualified Life II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Qualification not established Response: See Item I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Fccility: .all:ttna Nucl Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: RBCCW Operating Sequential Pir.nt ID No.: ZS-6731 Time Continuous Continuous P 1 Test component: Limit switch Temperature 111 F Simulta-( F) Profile 7 A 1.a) neous Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure (PSIA) 0.5 psig Profile 7 A, H 1.d) Simulta-neous Test Simulta-Modal Number: Relative EA740-20100 Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.b) neous Test Function: Position Indication Chemical Simulta-
& valve control Spray neous Accuracy: NA NA Note 2 NA 1.c) Test S rvice: Limit switch Radiation Sequential 8.59x106R 2.04x10 8R C,L 1.b) Test Loca. tion : Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs Test & gasket replacement EL. (-) 45'6" LPSI 40 yrs. except P.D.L. 2 Analysis required pump room Zone A2 .
gasket every 12 yrs . M7 yrn_i Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sutriergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. CONAX connector installed 1982
- 1. Vendor qual, report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 b) Page 4 of 12 2. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium c) Page 8 of 12 thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide, PH between
- 2. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-lll 10 & 11 (3000 PPM Boron).
dated 10/1/81 54-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 54-B 65 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Revised aging qualification reference. Revised gasket maintenance interval. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B.
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A l l l i l V) Justification for continued operation. N/A ! Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 54-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. The switch listed on SCEW Sheet 54-B now utilizes a CONAX connector to seal the internals of the switch from the environment.
- 2. SCEW Sheet 54-B is revised to reflect new qualification reference for aging.
- 3. FRC did not review the report referenced in the C of C for the EA740 switches, as stated in Note 3 of Item 64, Page Sg. The report listed by FRC on Page Sa and used in the evaluation on Pages Sa-g, Item 64 is not the report referenced on SCEWS 54-B.
(For all parameters with the exception of aging) See 2 above for aging qualificaton reference.
- 4. Operability times are referenced.
F;:cility: hillt, tone Nuclccr Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 EINIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS men!OD Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: RBCCW Operating Sequential PlXnt ID No.: ZS-6050 Time Continuous Continuous P 1 Test Component: Limit swtich Temperature o Simulta-( F) 111 F Profile 7 1.a) neous A Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.5 psig Profile 7 A, ig 1.a) neous Test Simulta-Modal Number: Relativ Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.b) neous EA740-20100 Test Function: Position Indication Chemical Simulta-
& valve control Spray neous NA Accuracy: NA Note 2 NA 1.c) Test S:rvice: Limit swtich Radiation Sequential 2.9 x 10 5R 2.04x108R C,L 1.b) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs. Test & Gasket repli cement EL. (-) 45'6" LPSI 40 yrs. except P.D.L. 2 Analysis required Pump room Zone A2 gasket every 12 (12 yre -) y=.
Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. CONAX connector installed 1982.
- 1. Vendor qual, report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 b) Page 4 of 12 2. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium c) Page 8 of 12 thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide, PH between
- 2. NAMCO Qualification Test Report QTR-lli 10 & 11 (3000 PPM Boron).
dated 10/1/81 55-B ** s
SCEWS No. 55-B 55 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Revised qualification reference for the parameter " Aging". Revised gasket replacement interval. II) SER concerns. Equipment in NRC Category I.B 4 Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. 7 Reaffirmed Revised New f
SCEWS No. 5 5-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. The switch listed on SCEW Sheet 55-B now utilizes a CONAX connector to seal the internals of the switch from the environment.
- 2. SCEW Sheet 55-B is revised to reflect new qualification reference for aging.
- 3. FRC did not review the report referenced in the C of C for the EA740 switches, as stated in Note 3 of Item 64, Page Sg. The report listed by FRC on Page Sa and used in the evaluation on Pages Sa-g, Item 64 is not the report referenced on SCEWS 55-B.
(For all parameters with the exception of aging) See 2 above for aging qualificaton reference.
- 4. Operability times are referenced.
Fccility: Mill;ttne NuclOrr Pr. Sta. Unit Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockat: 50-336 EINIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Simulta-System: RBCCW Operating neous Plcnt ID No.: HY-6050 Tim P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: Solenoid Temperature o Simulta-valve ( F) 111 F Profile A 1.b) neous 10 Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.5 psig Profile A, H neous 10 1.b) Test Mod =1 Number: Relative Simulta-NP-8321A6E Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous NA Accuracy: N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Ssrvice: Continuous Radiation Sequential 2.9 x 10 5 R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-)45'6" LPSI Sequential pump room Zone A-2 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes: This component is subject to a
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B radiation (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Rep)rt No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 56-B 5/20/83
F;cility: tull; ton 2 Nuclear Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock:t 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Main Steam Operating Sequential PlEnt ID No.: Time Continuous Continuous P 1 Test ZS-4250, 4251 Component: Limit swtich Temperature Simulta-( F) 0 ll2 F Profile 7 A 1.a) neous Test Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.6 psig Profile 7 A, H 1.a) neous Test Model Number: Relative Simulta-Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.b) neous EA180-ll302 Test Function: Position Indication Chemical Simulta-
& valve control Spray neous Accuracy: NA NA Note 2 NA 1.c) Test S:rvice: Limit reitch Padiation Sequential 1.6 106 R 2.04x10 8R C.L 1.b) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs. Gasket EL. ( -) 5 ' 0" West pipe- 40 yrs. except P.D.L. 2 Test & replacement penetration room Analysis required eve ry Zone A18 gasket (2y s.) 7 ;.r _
Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 1.These components are subject to a radiation
- 1. Vendor qual. report, plant file MRIR #1-26-79 (only) environment.
a) Fig. 1, Page 11 of 12 b) Page 4 of 12 2. The spray was composed of boric acid, water, sodium c) Page 8 of 12 thiosulfate, and sodium hydroxide, PH between
- 2. Wyle Report 17436-3 " '"'
57-B 11-1-80
SCEWS No. 57-B 67 1983 TER No. _ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: g IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A i l V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 57-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. Switch listed on SCEW Sheet 57-B is only requd. red to be operable in mild and harsh radiological environments. Teflon taped seal is not required.
- 2. Aging Analysis was accomplished by Wyle utilizing activation energies and other data documented in their data files. FRC apparently did not review NNECO response to SER wherein it was documented that preventive maintenance and surveillance will periodically monitor this equipment. PM on equipment does not indicate that equipment modification is required.
- 3. NNECO takes exception to Note 3 on Page Sg of Item No. 63 of the TER. NNECO provided the C of C for NAMCO EA180 series switches, which reference the proper test report. The C of C does not reference the document listed on Page Sa, item 63 of the TER as indicated by FRC. Their review should be done utilizing the proper reports which have been previously furnished to FRC. The Qualification Summary provided by Wyle is used solely for aging parameter as noted on SCEW Sheet 57-B.
- 4. Operability-times are referenced.
t
Facility: Millitone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;ts 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION l METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Main Steam Simulta-System: Operating neous Pirnt ID No.: Irl-4 250, Time 4251 P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: Temperature Simulta-Solenoid valve ( F) 112 F Profile A 1.b) neous 10 Test Manufacture: ASCO pressure Simulta-(PSIA) 0.6 psig Profile A, H neous 10 1.b) Test Modal Number: Relative a-100% A NP-8320A185E Humidity (%) 100 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve ~ Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S:rvice: Continuous Radiation Sequential 1.6 x 10 6R 2 x 10 8 R C,L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging l EL. (-) 5 ' 0" West pipe- 2 Sequential penetration room '40 Years 40 Years PDL Zone A-18 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes _: These components are subject to a radiation
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 673683/Rev. 0 58-B 5/20/83
G y y y N r r r y y y y I a a a a a a r r r a r D m B m B m B a a a a a B a a NS m 6 m 6 m 6 m B m B m 6 m B 0 AM u 6 u 6 u 6 m 6 m 6 m 6 m 6 8 TE St st e , s ut6 u 6 ut u 6 - ST e , t , se e , st se , st 1 TI eeB eeB eeB e , eB e , - U eh6 eh6 ee6 e B eeB eh6 eeB 1 O S s6 S s6 Sh6s s e 6 eh6 es6 eh6 1
$ S s$ s ! S S 5 D
.O LI T AT UE QM T
E
- E F .
H E l S R a u K N Q R O O I W T A N T O N I E . e . T A M c l iA L. : U e s U C p f A A A e L O S o , D. B A D r0 N P t - V P2 o 6 E N 6 T N E . N l O a P u M Q O C M T s E N u T E o g S M . u i . Y S N c n F s p s O e i r R p t 0 % A y I S n 6 8 0 V o 2 0 N 0 N C 3 1 1 4 E e i
) . r C e a r g u ( n c t e n t e) ey l o n S t i a rA vt a i e e t e r) uI ii c t g r . m a
am eF sS td iy a g r P r ri eT pO m( sP e( ai l m ma er i d i n e a p e m r P O T r eu h p a g b a P RH CS R A u S I e P l e s c v s e u N l n s c N O , a e i . en n e I 9 v v a g 1 YN e n T P 0 l m r d 5 A r o m2 d e a a D e l e t I R a4 e- t O C v t t B e : f g C a S n : l e 6 S tY SH r A 4 d S n . o ve R l l 3 E e 8 1 i o A N n o i xu Z ev 3 D n: p :A n i P l e n
- a. o a A EL o
- i . : r0 e i 0 T ao e e2 l M w " " ld t o5 w
N MN :d r b3 o o 66 eo a E ti u c8 :s : L :' vo t yT M D no t u- n y : n 6 '4 el n t : P : I en c NX ot c er o31 LF e 1 t I m ne a T io a ce 1 s a U Q et ol po f lH tl r id va i.. t de m u 1, tki c E t n sa u eP ci u aL L ov c mS n dW nP c re cE E oo o no UD yl o a o u c eH o lb D SP C M M F A S I FA *
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 66B SCEW SHEET NO. 66B Rev. 2 8/18/83 , EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: SOLENOID OPERATED VALVE PILOT OPERATOR FOR MAIN STEAM HEADER LOW POINT DRAINS HY-4209, 4193 MANUFACTURER: Automatic Switch Company (ASCO) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components are discrepant because of the lack of documented qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components are required to operate to isolate the main steam header low point drains on a main steam isolation signal. The failure of these components to perform this function is bounded by the existing accident analysis. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. m - m --,..m a _-- _
SCEWS No. 66-B 1983 TER No. _ 19 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Dociet No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None a II) SER concerns: Equipment in $RC Category IN ' ,
Response
~
'T . ,
Same as III
. / "
w v s , c - , 11I) TER concerns: - Squipment qualification pending modification 7 Response: ' ~
~,
J0stification for continued operation reviewed and
"~ ._ remarati valid';
.,3 .
- 6 Y
's .sc
~
,~
-IV)c Pro' posed correhtive action and schNdule.
,' Equipment co be replaced wii.h fullp' qualified equipment
('N
. prior to the end'of the 1985 refuel.ing outage.
, A s ,
/ ,
^
; .- V) '
'cJustificution for continued-operation.
, ~.
. .,;, y - . - -
;.v .
- X" Reaffirmed s
~
' '~
.- - .~
b,
. Reviwd - --.
1 g g b g Ng , %
#9 % N -4
.p.
s i j n .
'f "
w + 9 A. ., f -
.*y, _
,? ' -
~ -- -
Onc308ty: ~ .SkGi&N LM. lid. ' - n. , Unit: Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT WALUATIO" WESHEETJr' ,. Docket: 50-336
- .- ./
s . s . v , a, OUTSTANDING
. EQUIPMENT, DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT [iDOCUMENTATION FIEF * . QUAL.
.I f
- MFTHOD' ITEMS ParameterJb Spec. Qual. Spec. < Qual.
Sy; ten: Main Steam ' Operatin9- Cenbinuous' 3
,See Summary Plant ID No.: HY-4193 Time ISheet
. _r 66Ba Components . > Temperature ,
See summary Solenoid operated valva ( F) 324 F Profile sheet 21, A 66Ba . Manufacture: ASCO Pressure 1.6 psig A / See summary (PSIA) sheet , , 66Rn ' Mod 31 Number: Relative ' /. See summar) 100% A sheet WPHTX-8320A184 Humidity (%) , Function: 66Ba < Pilot solenoid valve ' Chemical See summary . Spray sheet , Accuracy: N/A NA NA 66Ba i service- Main Steam Radiation See summary Header low Point Drains
, , sheet ,
66Ba Locntion: Aux. Bldg. Aging . See summary P.D.L.
~
El. 36' 6" 40 yrs. sheet Zone A50 66Ba Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subna gence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 66-Ba 11-1-80 4
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 66Ba SCEW SHEET NO. 66Ba
' Rev. 2 8/18/83 , EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 ! EQUIPMENT: SOLENOID OPERATED VALVE PILOT OPERATOR FOR MAIN STEAM HEADER LOW POINT DRAINS HY-4209, 4193 l MANUFACTURER: Automatic Switch Company (ASCO) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components are discrepant because of the lack of documented qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components are required to operate to isolate the main steam header low point drains on a nain steam isolation signal. The failure of these components to perform this function is bounded by the existing accident analysis. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices.
- . _ , w - . - . - - ,
- - - . . , . . . 9 _,
SCEWS Nn. 66-Ba 1983 TER No. Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: None _
Response
III) TER concerns: None
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. l l V) Justification for continued operation. l X Reaffirmed Revised New Isi-
G t N h I s D y 0 NS 8 AM r - TE a 1 ST m - TI emB 1 U eu7 1 O a i ; s S s6 u u u u o o o o e e e e n n n n
.DO t a a t
a t t a lH rT l l l l UE ut ut ut ut QM ms i e ms i e ta s ms i e i e ST ST ST ST T E
- E F .
H E l 2 2 2 S R a 2, K u 1 1 N Q 1 1 R O O I W T N A T O N . I E . T A M c A H A A L. U e P N s U C p , D. L O S A P e B A D t - V o 7 E a N 6 s i T u s N o p E . u F N l n 0 O a i 0 % P u t 6 6 0 M Q n 1 1 0 O o 1 C C M T g E N s s T E u i r t S M . o s p a r Y N c u F e o S O e n o % Y yp R p i 0 4 0 A h e I S t 1 0 N 0 tR V n 1 0 1 4 r N o ,at E C nCs e ) ice
. r % A A e eMT a r g u ( / n / c t t e n t e) ey l N o N n s . ,
S t i a rA vt a i e kK . e t e r) uI ii c t g c c r m a am eF p sS td i y a g r E . n P r ri eT m( sP e( ai l m ma er i d i n e n n RI r a p e r eu h p a g b yo , P O T P RH CS R A u rt s a e S e e e : h ,h l c sTscrt u N t e moi N O s c osw I i en n rnS e T u . Yn e n P c g r f eSt o I r s d e r n R t i u l : f t c C C h n c o B : l e telone l 6 S c e n S u ve R t ro 3 E W
, t o
l n . ev B o n et p
- l. .
3 D C C . i w s :m p : r3 2 5 r t i t n x" u6 A' l e EL i o l nm1 oo0 0 T B oA: eo e- n o 5 ld t 0CC - o5 N R N e rC b2 o C eo 8 4
- w E 9 t r u 2 B vo a - mm0 yT M D 1 nu tm mR uB n
- c y n)1 t 3oo6 t P : I 1 es co NG oe c e o (- A el LF n 1t t i t e l s 2 I
U m 6ns at iv a c i e m - ssR et - oe f s l 4 tl r i t .n de u 0uuT itk eic Q E t nSpr saPmP uu nC e0 ca u c vr aLo ov c 1CCQ Z no yl o a d6 o nVu c e cE Z oo o . FUD SP C M M F A S I n lb FA D . 2
- 1
StBMARY SEEET 300. 67B SCEW SHEET NO. 67B Date: 8/18/83 , EQUIPMENT ENVIRO 10 ENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT BQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Pressure Switches PS-6119, A, B, C MANUFACTURER: Custom Component Switches (CCS) QUALIFICATION DISCRF.PANCY: These components lack documented radiation s.nd time / temperature aging qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION 10R CONTINUED OPERATION: These components provide low suction header pressure protection for the reactor building closed cooling water pumps. Due to the desirabil'ity of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. Replacement is scha'uled to be completed prior to start-up after the 1985 refueling outage.
%6
F;cility: rall; tons Nucl?ar Pr. St'2. Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockat: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS METHOD Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Gas & Aerated Simulta-Sy; tem: Liquid Radwaste Operating P Continuous P 1.a) neous Plant ID No.: Time Test HY-9126, Simulta-Component: Temperature o ( F) 112 F Profile A 1.b) neous Solenoid valve 10 Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Profile A, H 1.b) Simulta-0.6 psig (PSIA) neous 10 Test Mod =1 Number: Relative Simulta-NP-8321ASE Humidity (%) 100% 100 A 1.c) neous Function: Test Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: NA N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Strvice: Radiation Sequential Continuous 1.9 x 106 R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging EL. (-) 5'0" West pipe 2 Sequential penetration room 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence nn 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: 1. This ccxnponent must function in a radiation
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 68-B 5/20/83
l ll
)
y l n ( o n o - i t a i G d N a I r D NS a 3 8 AM / TE n 0 ST i 2 TI U n / 5 O o i t l l c a a n D - a a
- - - - i i u
.O a a a t t f LH t l s t t t t n n AT uut l s uut l s uut l s l s e e t UE uut uut s QM mos mos mos mos mos ut qs ut qs u i ee i ee iee i ee iee ee ee m S nT S nT S nT S nT S nT ST ST t n
e , T nt E E
- on pe F .
H E l mm S R a ) ) ) ) ) ) on K u a. b. b. c. d. e. 2 co N Q r R O 1 1 1 1 1 1 si O I iv W T h n A Te N T . O N 1 I E . T M c H A U e A A U C p P A s a L O S A
/ L, L D e B A D N C P t -
V o 8 E N 6 s T u s N o R r E . u e e 8 a 3 N l n l l 0 e 4 O a i i i 1 Y P u t f0 f0 0 M Q n o1 o1 0 B x 0 2 O o r r 1 24 C C P P 2 4 M T 99 E N g R . . ' T E i 6 gr - Y S M N c F s p 0 1 s r i a S O e FP R P 2 % a p 1 6 0 A x e BAA I S 1 0 / Y V 0 1 N 9 . xx N 0 vii 0 E 1 4 edd e ) Rnn v g r % e ee e 0 r u ( n c R pp R 1 e n t e) ey l o n T pp 6 t i a rA vt a i e /AA
/
e t e r) uI ii c t g 8 8 D m a am eF p sS td i y a g r 7)) 6 3 b r ri eT m( sP e( ai l m ma er i d i n e n 6bd 1 7 a p e r eu hp a g b 2 6 r P O T P RH CS R A u a S S 3 R ci Q Q J )
- A c sA 1 2 N e e 58
[ O t e s c o o I ds v en n N .. N i o T P ea t w l s g YM e r rr t I ad a u d e t aa r R ra V o l : f rPP o o R J 6 C eR e O C d u n B : l ve e R e pAAD p e Q 3 S E A d v S i i . ev R L_ 3 D l A o A t x "0 l e n R xxx
&i: a n / n u EL o tddd iii
- u. v : rE9 e N o t
o5 0 T N s qo aiN : r e
% 8 l C A'
5 ld i t snnn es yn
- E M
GL 0t i D 9no d u t 1 : uAn S m o : y : n) eo vo el t eeee T a T ppp ppp O M P : I 6e n c N02 ot e o (- n As c e I m 7ne a io c a c i LF e C OAAA C S O U et - ol f l 3 t l r i t m S))) Ltk Q t nYpo u . de u Aace A E saHmS n e8 ci u v al ov c G,UD ic no yl o a doP-u nP c c r e cE o oo lb o . SP C M MNF D . t A S L FA
- 1 2 l
Fccility milston] Nuclear Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPCNENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 r ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Gas & Aerated Sequential Syrtem: Liquid Padwaste Operating Continuous Continuous P 1 Test Pltnt ID No.: Time ZS-9126, Component: Temperature Limit Switch ( F) Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure (PSIA) Model Number: EA740-20100 Relative Humidity (%) Function: Valve position indication & control ' Chemical circuitry Spray Accuracy:NA Service: Waste Gas tank Radiation 8 inlet isolation valve 1.94x106R 2.04X10 R C,L 1 Sequential Test Iocation: Aux. Bldg. A9189 Jasket EL. (-) 5'0" West pipe ch!" 1 Sequential (( "tC [$"" penetration room Zone A17 40 Years (7 yrs.) P.D.L. Test every 7 yrs, Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence un (Documentation
References:
Notes: This component must function in a
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-lll #" " " " " ""
- dated 10/1/81 69-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 69-B 1983 TER No. 68 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION ) SER/TER REVIEW l Millstone Unit 2 l Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 69-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedu1=. F/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Eone L251 ear Pr. Sta. Unit: Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Gas & Aerated equential Sy tems Liquid Radwaste Operating Continuous Continuous P 1 Test PlCnt ID No.: Time ZS-7690 Component: Temperature Limit Switch ( F) Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure (PSIA) r Modal Number: Relative EA740-20100 Humidity (%) j Function: Valve position indication & control ' Chemical s circuitry Spray Accuracy: N/A 8 S3rvice: Reactor coolant Radiation . 2.04X10 R 1 Sequential , 6 ' sample valve 1.64x10 R C,L Test Locr. tion : Aux. Bldg. Aging 40 yrs. Sequential jghyhement ' El. (-) 5' 0" 40 Years except P.D.L. 1 Test 7 required Zone A18 gasket ! (7 yrs.) Analysis every 7 yrs .
}
Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nm CDocumentation
References:
Notes
- This component must function in a radiation g
(only) environment.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-111 e
{ dated 10/1/81 l 1 I I t 69-Ba 5/20/83 {
SCEWS No. 69-Da 1983 TER No. 68 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 69-Ba is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
3,,, ,, 777 III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
FCcility: nill; tone Nucl;'r Pr. Sta. Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dock;t 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. See. summary System: Service Water Operating Continuous sheet 70B Pir.nt ID No.: 6307B Time TY-6308, 6307A, 6306 Component: Temperature 110 F 888 """" Y Solenoid valve ( r) A sheet 70B Manufacture: ASCO Pressure see summary (PSIA) 0.4 psig A, H sheet 70B Modal Number: Relative See summary HT-8320A-102 Humidity (%) 100% A sheet 70B Function: Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Spray See summary Accuracy: NA NA NA sheet 70B Service: Radiation See summary RBCCW Heat Exchanger N/A sheet 70B Location: Aux. Bli;, Aging See summary EL. (-)25'6" 40 Years P.D$L. sheet 70B Zone AlB Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 70-B 11-1-80
2 i
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. SCEW SHEET NO.
. Rev. 2 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SOLENOID OPERATED VALVES EQUIPMENT: Pilot operating valves for HU-6306, 6307A, 6307B, 6308 MANUFACTURER: Automatic Switch Company (ASCO) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components are discrepant because they lack documented qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components are required to open with a safety injection actuation signal. The catalog specifications for this equipment envelop the environmental parameters experienced by these components during the accident, hence the environment will not impair'these components in the performance of their safety function. The manufacturer is currently reviewing the applicable components and the respective environmental profiles in order to provide documented assurance of component suitability to perform its safety function.
~~
. ..~.,a. . . . . . _ _ . _ , ,
Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices.
SCEWS No. 70-B 1983 TER No. _ Date: P,/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sutunary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: None
Response
III) TER concerns: None
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. i V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
Facility: ntlictone Nuclear Pr. St3. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit: Two Dockat: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. See summary *. System: Service Water Operating Continuous cheet 71B Plcnt ID No.: Time ZS-6306, 6307, 6308 Com nent: Temperature See summary it Switch A sheet 71B (OF) 110 F Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure See summary 0.4 psig A, II (PSIA) sheet 71B Model Number: D-2400X Relative A See summary 100% Humidity (%) sheet 71B Function: Position Indication & Control ~ chemical See sammary Circuit Spray sheet 71B NA NA Accuracy: NA see summary Service: Limit switch Radiation sheet 71B NA i Inc2 tion: Aux. Bldg. Aging See summary EL. (-)25'6" 40 Years P.D.L. sheet 71B Zone A1B Flood Ievel Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sutunergence na 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: 71-B 11-1-80
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 71B SCEW SHEET NO. 71B
' Rev. 2 8/18/83
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: STEM MOUNTED LIMIT SWITCHES ZS-6306, 6307, 6308 - Service Water Supply Isolation to the RBCCW Heat Exchangers National Acme Corporation (NAMCO) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: This equipment provides contacts for control circuit input and position indication for containment isolation valves that function to mitigate a LOCA. They are all located outside the containment and are subject to an environment which is enveloped by the equipment catalog specifications. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices.
SCEWS Ns. 71-B 1983 TER No. _ Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: None -
Response
1 III) TER concerns: None
Response
I i IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New L
Facility: aallstona Nucl=r Pr. Sta. Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Doctit: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Close & stay See summary System: Service Water Operating closed on sheet 72B Pltnt ID No.: Time SIAS & SLB HY-6438, 6439 outside ent nt. Component: Temperature See summary 4 way solenoid ralve (oF) 155 F sheet 72B Manufacture: ASCO Pressure See summary (PSIA) 0.5 psig A, H sheet 72B Model Number: Relative 100% A See summary HT-834481 Humidity (%) sheet 72B Function: Pilot solenoid valve ~ Chemical See summary Accuracy: NA NA NA S rvice: TBCCW HX inlet Radiation See summary isolation NA sheet 72B Location: Turbine Bldg. Aging See summary one T10 40 Years P.D.L. sheet 72B Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 72-B 11-1-80
...... . - p I
72B
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. ( 72B SCEW SHEET NO. 1
'Rev. 1 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT SIDetARY MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SOLENOID OPERATED VALVES EQUIPMENT:
Pilot Operators for Valve No. (HV-6438, 6439)
#1, 2 & 3 turbine building closed cooling water heat exchanger inlet isolation valves MANUFACTURER: Automatic Switch Company (ASCO)
QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components function as pilot operating mechanisms for TBCCW valves outside containment. These valves are required to close on a SIAS. The catalog specifications for this equipment envelop the environmental parameters experienced by these components during a MSLB, therefore, the environment will not impair these components in performance of their safety function. The manufacturer is currently reviewing the subject components and the respective environmental profiles in order to provide documented assurance of component suitability to perform its safety function. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. .
SCEWS Ns. 72-B 1983 TER No. _ 26 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III. TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification. III)
Response
Justification for continued operation reviewed and remains valid. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
Facility: .ilctone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Unit: 'No SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Docket: 50-336 ENVIPJONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ME'HIOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System SI & CNTMT SPRAY Operating Note 1 1 sequential Time Continuous Continuous Plant ID No.: HV3008, HV3009 Component: Valve Motor Temperature Operators (OF) NA Manufacture: Pressure Limitorque (PSIA) NA Model Number: SMB-1 Relative S/N 152444, 152443 Humidity (%) Function: Operators NA For CS 16.lA, 16.lB ' Chemical Spray Accuracy: Not required NA Service: Containment sump Radiation se< ential recirculation 8.6 x 106 R 2.04x10 8R C,L 2.a) test Incation: Aux bldg. Aging plant el. (-)45'6" Zone A2 simulated design 1.b) sequential 40 Yrs. 40 yrs. life test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level Yes Suinergence un
' Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Limitorque Test Report 600198 1/2/69 to 4/29/69 1. Valve must open on SRAS and stay open under radiation and Addemdum 1 (only) environment. Ref. FSAR 6.2.3.1, sys. description.
a) page 4 b) page 5
- 2. Limitorque Test Report 600376A,4/26/76 to 8/30/72 a) Par. 2.1
. 83-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 83-B 1983 TER No. 11 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL. QUAI.IFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 EI) Sum =ary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model Number, revised Operating Time: Specification, Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised - New
SCEWS No. 83-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 83-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-OlB. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - H. K. Porter 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This wac included in the October, 1980 submittal, Appendix I, sheets 54 and 55. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to tbnse items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and irtermination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Thermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982.
Facility: Millctone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPOCENT EVALUATIC*i WORK SNEET Units Ttso Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION hEF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. sequential Sy;tems Chem. & Vol. Cntl Operating Continuous Continuous Note 1 I Time test Plant ID No.: CH 501 &2 Component: Valve Motor Temperature Operator ( F) NA Manufacture: Limitorque Pressure (PSIA) NA Model Number: SMB-00 Relative S/N 134086 Humidity (t) Function: Operator NA for CH501 Chemical Spray Accuracy: Not required NA Service: Volume control Radiation 8.32x105R 8 2.04x10 R C,L 1.b) sequential tank discharge valve test LocJ. tion: Au'. A Bldg. Aging simulated plant El. (-)25'6" Zone A9 40 yrs. 40 yrs. design 1.c) sequential life test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un i
*Doctamentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Limitorque Test Report B0003 11/13/74 to 1/23/75 1. Valve must close and stay closed under radiation a) par. 2.1.3 (only) environment.
b) par. 2.3 c) par. 5.0
- 2. FSAR Sec. 9.2.3.4 & P & ID 25203-26017
. 84-B 5/20/83
SCEk'S No. 84-B 7 1983 TER No.__ Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEk' Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEk' sheet. Added Model Nu:nber, revised Operating Time: Specification. Qualification and Documentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised New
i SCEt!S No. 84-B 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 84-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page Sf, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class B. 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheet 83. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) At the time of the Limitorque Tests for IEEE 382 (72) and 323 (71) (Report B0003) the criteria for aging was not well established. Thermal, Mechanical, and Radiation Aging Programs were based on Limitorque's experience and sound engineering judgement. Docu-mentation, as with "A" above, is and has been available for audit, which shows that Limitorque was appraised of the service conditions for the valves and that they are qualified by the report referenced. Also, as stated in the response to the 1981 SER, these valves are included in the Plant Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program.
Docket: Su -336 ENVIFDNMENT Note 3. DOCUMENTATION REF# QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS r l
~
Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. , System: Chem. & Vol. Cntl Operating 2 hrs. max. Note 4 Note 2 3.a) sequential Plant ID No.: P18A, P18B Time Note 2 test P18C Component: Pump Motors Temperature 460V (OF) NA Manufactures Westinghouse Pressure ! (PSIA) NA Model Ninhar Cat. Type Relative TCDP Humidity (%) j Function: Pump Drive NA
' Chemical Opray Accuracy: Not required i NA Service: Charging Pumps Radiation 5 se9"ential 5.25x10 R 2x108R C,L 2.a) test Iocation: Aux. Bldg. Aging sequential El'. (-)25'6" Zone A9 1.
40 yrs. 40 yrs. 2.b) test rlood Ievel Blev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sulmergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
'l. Combustion Engineering' Spec. 3072-PE-403 and 1. Pump motor replacement completed.
SYSB0 PE-403 replaced. Completion is planned for late 1981.
- 2. W Qual. Report MM-9112 (Prev. WCAP-9112) 2. Pumps must run until the boric acid tanks are empty Medium Motor 's Gear Riv. Class lE -
.(2 hrs. max.) Ref. W. G. Counsil to R. Reid letters a) 2.10.5.2 Pg. 7,. b) 2.10.8 Pg. 12 (Fig. 3. Pg. 11) 3/22/79 and 4/9/79.
- 3. Operating e.nd Maintenance Instructions - 3. Motors must function in a radiation (only) environment.
Reciprocating Charging Ptunp NP18-3.1 TFS 4. Motor-is designed.for continuous operation. a) Sect. iii, Form A-2 Temp. rise test duration was 5.5 hrs. 85-B 8/18/83
~
SCEWS No. gs_n
~
94 1983 TER No. _ _> Date: 8/18/83 EQUIFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
'SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2
\
Dochec No. 50-336
,1) Summary of new information en SCEW sheet.
(Rev. 8/1.1/83)
- 1) Note 1 changed to indicate all units (motors) replaced.
- 2) Documentation Reference 2 changed to indicate that WCAP 9112 has been superseded by Qual. Report 1!M 9112.
II) SER concerns: Equipinent in NRC Category II. A :
Response
Same as III below u III R concems: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
, See attached.
IV) Proposed corrective action and ' schedule. N/A u s
- 7) Justification for: continued operation.
l- N/A Reaffirmed ,
- x. '
Revised - j 7
..m__ _, -. , _ - - _ - ,, .
I ' SCEWS No. 85-B 1 1983 TER No. 94 N 8/18/83 III) Response: NNECO responses to FRC's comments:
- 1) Adequate similarity between equipment and test specimen established - Deficient NNECO has in its document files, f or audit review, the purchase document and specificaton for the~ pump motors. The documentation indicates Class H insulation supplied by Westinghouse on the Class IE motors. Qualification is under WCAP-9112 which has been changed to Qualification Report E -9112.
Similarity has been established and is available for audit.
- 2) Aging degradation evaluated adequately - Deficient Aging has been adequately addressed and justified on the SCEW
! sheet which corresponds to M -9112 qualification report (previously WCAP-9112).
- 3) Qualified life or replacement schedule established - Deficiant Qualified life has been established of fo. ty (40) years. There is no replacement schedule.
- 4) Criteria regarding aging simulation satisfled - Deficient L Aging simulation was done in accordance to the Arrenhius
! - ~ method and justified in E E 9112 report. "
- 5) Criteria regarding temperature / pressure exposure:
l Duration adequate - Deficient N Temperature / pressure exposure requirements are not applicable because the-equipment operate within the given temperature range and pressure is atmospheric to 10,000 feet. Both are specified under E mm 9112. Also, the SCEW sheet indicates N/A.
- 6) Criteria regarding radiation satisfied - Deficient
- l\ ' ' Radiation requirement as indicated on SCEW sheet is 5.25ES. The equipment is qualified to 2E8 in y W 9112.
n 44 ,
- 7) Equipment qualification not established - Deficient Equipment qualificaton has been established under y M 9912 (previously WCAP 9112). . Equipment is considered fully qualified by NNECO.
f - l 4 hp
SCEWS No. 85-B 1983 TER No. 94 8/18/83 NNECO responses to FRC's NOTE comments:
- 1) The installed motors and the tested motorettes are of the same insulation materials for Class H insulation which were qualified by Westinghouse MM 9112 (Prev, WCAP 9112).
The motors lubrication (grease for bearings) are replaced as recommended by the manufacturer. Historically, manufacturer's requirements and replacement cycles are very conservative. In addition, }[ MM 9112 address bearing and lubrication qualification.
- 2) The testing performed on the motorettes more than adequately address the manufacturer's motors as being qualified. The stress placed on the motorettes are greater than those in a completed motor.
- 3) The motor lead splices and materials are qualified under }[ MM 9112 and are of the same type as that in the installed equipment.
The bearing end lubrication qualification has been addressed in nudber one (1) above in this set of responses. NNECO again reiterates that the equipment (motors) are qualified for their intended use and the qualification infonnation is avialable in our files for audit.
Facility: Millttone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit:
- Two Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT
@ IPMENT DESCRIPTION ME'DIOD IIEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Sy; tem: Chem. & Vol. Cntl. Operating continuous continuous 1, 2 Plant ID No.: PS224X, Th PS224Y, PS224Z Component: Temperature Vacuum switches (OF) 0F 160 F A 1, 2 Manufacture: Custom Pressure Component (PSIA) 2 PS Model Number: Relative 604 VBI-351S Humidity (%) 100 A Function: Valve / pump _ control ' chemical Accuracy: N/A NA Service : P18A,B,C Radiation section header N/A rocstion: Aux. Bldg. Aging See sunnary El. (-)25'6" 40 Years P.D.L. sheet 86B Zone AlB Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Sutmergence 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: I 1. 10-13-80 letter from Theryn Eckstein, Custom Control Sensors, to R. K. McCarthy
- 2. Custom Component Switches, Test Report QTR 604-01 86-B 11-1-80
SUMMARY
SEEET NO. 86B SCEW SHEET NO. 86B Rev. 1 8/18/83 , EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT SIDMARY MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: l'ressure Switches PS-224X, Y, Z Charging Pump Suction 11eader Pressure MANUFACTURER: Custom Component Switches (CCS) QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented radiation and time / temperature aging qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These componento provide low suction header pressure protection for the charging pumps. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with c21 sting license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices.
- \
SCEWS No. 86-B 1983 TER No. _ Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Nove II) SER concerns: None
Response
III) TER concerns: None
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
Facility: callEtone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit Two Dockst 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT Note 2. METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. operating Continuous Continuous Note 3. 1.a) sequential System: SIS & Cont. Spray test Plcnt ID No.: HV3021 Time 3y HV3022 Component: Valve Motor Temperature Operator ( F) NA Manufacture: Limitorque Pressure (PSIA) NA Mod 31 Number: SMB-0 Relative S/H 145931 Humidity (%) NA Function: Operator for CS 4.lA Chemical Accuracy: Not required fA Strvice: Cont. Spray Radiation sequential Stop Valve 2.57x106R 2.04x100R C,L 2.a) test Locstion: Aux. Bldg. Aging simulated plant El.(-)5'0" Zone A18 40 Yrs. 40 yrs. design 1.b) sequential (HV3021), A17(HV3022) test life Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence ' Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Valve must open and stay open. May require to 1 Limitorque Test Report 600198 1/2/69 to 4/29/69 close after containment spray is terminated.
and Addendum 1 2. Valve must function in a radiation (only) environment. a) page 4 3. FSAR 6.4.3.1 & P & ID 25203-26017 b) page 5
- 2. Limitorque Test Report 600376A,4/26/72 to 8/30/72 a) Par. 2.1 89-B 8-18-83
SCEWS No. 89-B 1983 TER No. _ 9 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sut:nnary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added Model No., Revised operating time, qualification and docurentation. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A 2 Response: g 3 III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification :.st established Response: See attached IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A l V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 89-B 8/18/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 89-B, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - H. R. Porter 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheets 58 and 59. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation Thermal and Mechanical Aging. Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with 1&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982.
Facility .115 tone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALtWfION WORK SEET Unit: Two , Docket: 50-336 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF*- EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Operating 2 1 Sequential System: Cntmt. Press. continuous continuous Test Plant ID No.: PT-8113, Time 8114, 8115, 8116 . Component: Temperature Press. Transmitter (op) Manufacture: Foxboro Pressure (PSIA) Model Number: Relative N-E11DM Humidity (%) Function:
' chemical accuracy:
Service: Cntmt. Press. Radiation 8 Sequential 2.22x106R 2 X 10 R C 1 l Test
^1
%",tig:5' A17,A18 1) 10 yrs. 1 Sequential See Notes 40 Years P.D.L. Test 1&2
- 2) 9 yrs.
Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes: These components must function in a radiation
- 1. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 45592-4 dated 5/18/83 (only) environment.
- 2. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 1. Transmitter qualified life is 10 years.
- 2. Viton "O" Ring for transmitter cover is qualified for 9 ye8rs at 120'F, however, must be replaced each time cover is removed.
91-B 8-18-83
SCEWS No. 91-B 1983 TER No. 47 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEW Sheet 91-Brevised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER co!.cernst Equipment in NRC Category I .B ,
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
**E "*"
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Facility: .llctone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Unit: Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK S!!EET Docket: 50-336
=--
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION EINIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ME'DIOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Syctem Safety injection
~
Operating l IY 5 'd60 P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: S len id Temperature Sinulta-Operated valve (oF) Profile , neous N/A 10 N/A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure
~
Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous N/A 10 N/A 1.b) Test Model Number: Relative Simulta-NP-831655E Humidity (%) neous Function: Pilot solenoid N/A 100 N/A 1.c) Test valve ' Chemical i Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S;rvice: Safety injection Radiation Sequential pump discharge bypass 6.37x10 6R 2 x 10 8R C,L 1.e) Test header - Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 45' 6" Sequential 2
'40 Years 40 Years PDr. Test Floc,d Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence
* .~ _.
- Documentation
References:
Notes: This e xponent in aubject to a
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B radiatierl oa.ly aavironment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 5/20/83 94-B
l Facility: . llitone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SY3 TEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit Two , Docket: 52-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DE5CRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Primary Makeup Simulta-Syltem: Water Operating neous Plant ID No.: HY-7311 Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: Solenoid Temperature Simulta-operated valve ( F) Profile neous 112 F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacturn: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test , Ralative Simulta-Model thtmber: Humidity (%) neous , NP-8321ASE Function: Pilot solenoi.d 100 100 A 1.c) Test . valve ' Chemical Simulta-Spray neous - Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S:rvice: Primary makeup Radiation Segrantial ; wnter to quench tank 2 x 108 R 1.94x106R C,L - 1.e) Te s t- l,' IncItion: Aux. Bldg. Aging 4 El. (-) 5' 0" Sequential ( Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PDL 1 Test j t, Flood Level Elev:
- Above Flood Level: Yes Sulmergence
- 1 l ..
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. As)S 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 4 e) Appendix D t
?
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 l
1 95-B 5/20/83 4
?
Facilitys ...llLtone Nuclear Pr. Sta. Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SID.:ZT Unit , Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION MCTHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Ctmt. Air Simulta-System: Recirculation Operating neous Plant ID No.: HY-6073, Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test 6077 Simu1ta-Component: Solenoid Temperature Profile neous valve (OF) 112* F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Simulta-Model Number: Relative NP-831655E Humidity (%) 100 100 A 1.c) Function: Pilot solenoid valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) , Test S;rvice: Ctmt, air recirc Radiation Sequential cooled inlet 2.42x106R 2 x 10 8 R C,L 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5'0" Sequential 2 Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Mn fDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 96-E 5/20/83
Facility: . llstone Nuclear Pr. Sta. S' 3 TEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Unit Two , Docket 50-336 DOCUM124T/ TION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT ~ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
"" #~
System Cntmt. Air Recirc Operating " HY-6084, Time d.e*rr"t Plant ID No.: P Continuous P 1.a) Simulta-Component: Solenoid Valve Temperature neous (OF) Profile 112* F 10 A 1.b) Test
^
Manufacture: Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Relative Simulta-Model Number: Humidity (%) neous MP-831655E Function: Pilot solenoid 100 100 A
~
1.c) ~ Test valve . Chemical Sirculta-Spray ncous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S:rvice: Ctmt. air recirc Radiation Sequential 6 8 cooler control valve 2.56x10 R 2 x 10 R C,L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5'0" Sequential Zone A-18 - 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 97-B 5/20/83
W . Units Two , SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION SP3RK FHECT Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING l METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. i Qual. l Sample & Gas System: Effluents Operating Simulta-Plant ID No.: HY-6092 Tim P Con tinuous P lea) T Component: Solenoid Temperature Simulta-operated valves ( F) Profile n:ous 112 F 10 A 1.b) Test ! Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta- l (PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Mod;l Number: Relative iSimulta- l NP-831655E Humidity (%) neous l Function: Pilot solenoid 100 100 A 1.c) Test vr.lve ' Chemical i Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Sample & Gas Radiation 1.02X106R 2 x 10 8 R C,L 1.e) Seqttential l effluent filter stop Test valve Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5' 0" Sequential Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PLL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence un j
- Documentation
References:
Notes: '
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 98-B 5/20/83
Facility: ..llctone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Units Two , Docket 50-336 DOCUMElfrATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Onl,. Instrument Air Simulta-Syrtem: Operating neous Pltnt ID No.: HY-7003 Th P 1.a) Test P Continuouq Temperature Simulta-Component: ( F) Profile neous Solenoid Operated valve 112*F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSlG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Relative Simulta-Model Number: NP-8321ASE Humidity (%) neous Function: Pilot valve 100 100 A 1.c) Test
~ Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Ctat. instrument Radiation Sequential air block valve 1.65x106R 2 x 10 8R CL 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5"0" 2 Sequential Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence Mn CDocumentation
References:
Notos:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 99-B 5/20/83 4
~ ne Nucl:ar Pr. EGD.
SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SliEET Unit Two , Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. . Simulta-System: Primary Drain Operating neous Plant ID No.: HY-9016 Time P Continuous P 1.a) ' Test
~
Temperature Simulta-Component: Solenoid ( F) Profile neous operated valves 112*r 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) P~rofile neous . 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.c) Test Relative Simulta-Model Number: NP-8321ASE Humidity (%) ! neous Function: Pilot valve 100 100 A ] 1.d) l Test
' Chemical ! 2imulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Primary drain Radiation Sequential tank discharge isol. 2.12x106R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Tes_
velve Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5' 0" Sequential 2 Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PDL Test . Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence cDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B -
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 100-9 5/20/83
Sta A., 17CN WOpx SH2T Units TW t Dock:;t s 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT N.SCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. . Simulta-RCS System: Operating neous Plant ID No.: Time Continuous P 1.a) Test HY-505 P g S len id Temperature Simulta-Component: operated valves (oF) Profile neous ll2* F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Relative Simulta-Model Number: NP-8321ASE Humidity (%) neous Function: 100 100 A 1.c) Test Pilot valve Chemical Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A B N/A 1.d) Test N/A -- Service: RCP Bleed Off Radiation Sequential Isolation valve 2.12x106R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Test Location: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-)5' 0" Sequential Zone A-18 '40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Mn CDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B
. a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 102-B -5/20/83 a
SYSTEM COMPONENT EVaLUKdu O N w - e Units Two Dock;ts 50-336 DOCUMENTAM ON REF2 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION MET *. LOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qua1., Simulta-Syrtem: Ctat. Air Operating l neous Plcnt ID No. : HY-6080, Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test 6088 Simulta-Component: Solenoid Temperature ( F) Profile neous operated valve ' 112*F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSIG 10 A,H 1.b) Test Relative Simulta-Model Number: NP-831655 Ilumidity (%) neous Function: Pilot valve 100 100 A 1.c) Test Chemical Simulta-Spray naous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Service: Ctat. air recirc Radiation Sequential cooler control valve 1.94x106R 2 x 10 8R C,L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5' 0" 2 Sequential
'40 Years 40 Years PDL Test Flood Level Elev:
Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence Mn
- Documentation
References:
Not<ts : -
- 1. ASCO Iest Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4,3 -
e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report AQR 67368/Rev. 0 106-B 5/20/83
em. . Unit: M SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK Sfi.r7, Dockst: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING METI!OD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Sy; tem: Ctat. Air . HY-6072, Operating Simulta-Platt ID No. : Time { 6075 P Continuous s P 1.a) iTest l j Component: Solenoid Temperature j operated valve Sit.alta-( F) Profile neous 112'F 10 A 1.b) Test Manufacture: A CO ' Pressure ! (PSIA) (Simulta-Profile nemis 0.6 PSIC 10 A,H 1.b) Test ' Model Number: Relative Simulta-NP-831655 Pilot valve Ilumidity(%) ncous Function: 100 100 A 1.c) T?st chemical i Spray Simulta-Accuracy: NA neous N/A B N/A 1.J) Test.
~
Snrvi,ce : Ctmt. Air rceirc cooler inlet Radiation Sequential 1.16x106R 2 x 10 8R C,L 1.4) i Test
- Aux. Bldg.
gtti , , , Aging ~ Zone A-17 Sec,uential 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence Mn CDocumentation
References:
Notes: This component must function in a
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B radiation (only) environment.
a) Appendi:: A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 107-B 5/20/83
Units Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK Ejit.st Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING HETHOD IIEMS
. Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual System: N2 Operating Simulta-Platt ID No. : Time eous HY-7312 P Continuous P 1.a) Test Component: Pilot Temperature solenoid valve Simulta-(or) Profile
[ neous 112*F 10 A 1.b) Manufacture:
; l Test Pressure j Si.ttblta-(PSIA) Profile neaus 0.6 PSIC 10 A,H 1.b) Yest Model Number: Relative Simulta-NP-8320A189E Humidity (%)
Fungtion: 100 100 A 1.c) Te P lot valve Chemical i Simulta-Spray l Accuracy: neous 3 N/A B N/A 1.d) Test S2rvice: N2 stop valve Radiation to S.I tanks Sequential 1.94x106R 2 x 108 R C.L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg. Aging El. (-) 5'0" Sequential Zone A-17 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: ' Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un CDocumentation
References:
Not g: This component must function in a
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B radiation (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D 2 ASCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. 0 108-B 5/20/83
s , Units TWo SYSTEM COMPONENT L4Nm2tfr2G h Docket: 50-336 DOCUME TION REF2 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION MED{OD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Cntmt. Sump Simulta-Syltem: Operating neous Platt ID No.: HY-9150 Time P Continuous P 1.a) Test Temperature Simulta-Component: Solenoid ( F) Profile neous operated valve ll2*F 10 A 1.h) _ Test Manufacture: ASCO Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous 0.6 PSlG 10 A,1 1.b) Test Simulta-Model Number: Relative neous NP-8321ASE Humidity (%) Function: Pilot valve 100 100 A 1.c) Test Chemical i Simulta-Spray neous Accuracy: N/A N/A B N/A 1.d) Test Srrvice: Ctat sump Eadiation Sequential isolation valve 1.57x106R 2 x 108 R C,L 1.e) Test Incation: Aux. Bldg Aging El. (-) 5'0" Sequential Zone A-18 40 Years 40 Years PDL 2 Test Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence No 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: This component must function in a
- 1. ASCO Test Report No. AQS 21678/TR Rev. B radiation (only) environment.
a) Appendix A Par. 5 b) Appendix A Fig. 9.2 c) Appendix A Par. 8.1.3 d) Appendix A Par. 9.4.2.4.3 e) Appendix D
- 2. AXCO Test Report No. AQR 67368/Rev. O llO-B 5/20/83
Dock t: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Cntmt. Recirc Operating continuous continuous P 1 Test Plant ID No.: ZS-6080, Time ZS-6084 , ZS-6088, 6092 Component: Limit switch Temperature i ( F) Manufacture: NAMCO Pressure (PSIA) l l Model Number: EA740-20100 Relative Function: Position ind. valve control Chemical i-Accuracy: N/A S:rvice: Cntmt. air Radiation ! quen ial recirc cooler control 6 2.10X10 R 1 1 valve 2.12x10 R C,L Test Incation: Aging 40 years en ial Aux. Bldg. 40 Years except P.D.L. 1 psgmen$' gasket required Zone A18 everv 7 vrs, (7 yrc) Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence nn __
- Documentation
References:
Notes: This component must function in a.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-lll dated 10/1/81 112-e 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 112-B 1983 TER No. __ 68 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT EhTIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER RETIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 112-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. 6 \ II) $IR concerns Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Saoe as III ( III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SYSTEM COMPONENT EV,mOATION WORK SiliW Unit Two Dockst: 50-336 0 QUAL. OUTSTANDING E?NIRO?DiENT DOCUME! ATION REF METHOD ITEMS EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. _ Qual. Sequential Primary Makeup Operating Continuous 1 Test SYItem,- ZS-7311 continuous P - Plent ID No. : Time Temperature Component: Limit switch (op) Manufteture: Pressure NM (PSIA) i I Madal Number: EA740-20100 Relative Humidity (%) Function: Position ind. Chemical
& valve control Spray Accuracy:
N/A Quench tank Radiation Service: makeup 8 1 Sequential 2.Oul0 R water entmt. isolation 1.94x106R C,L Test valve Gasket Location: Aging 40 yrs. Sequential replacement Aux. Bldg. El. (-)5' 0" 40 Years cg P.D.L. 1 et required every 7 yrs. Zone A18 (7 Yrs) Flood Level Elev: Abova Flood Level: Yes Submergence nn l
' Documentation
References:
Notes: This component must function in a harsh radiation (only) environment.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-lli dated 10/1/81 ll3-B 5/20/83 1
SCEWS No. 113-B 1983 TER No. 68 Date: __ 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENTIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Surmary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS ll3-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipnent installed. II) SER concernet Equipment in NRC Category I,B
""E "*
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Facility.* *lctone Nuclear Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EVMATION WORK SHEET Units Two -- Docket: 50-336 __ . __ QUAL. OUTSTANDING DOCUMENTATION REF* _ ITEMS ENVIRONMENT MEDICD EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Qual. SW. Qadl-Parameter Spec. 1 b"9"*"EI"I Continuous Continuous P Test 2 Operating System: ZS-7312 Time Pirnt ID No. : = Component: Limit switch Temperature ( F) _. NAMCO Pressure Manufacture: (PSIA) Relative Modsl Number: EA740-20100 Humidity (%) Function: Position Indication & valve Chemical control Spray Accuracy: N/A Sequential Service: N2 stop valve to Radiation 2.04X10 R 8 1 Test S.I. tanks 1.94x106R C,L Aging Sequential hypet Loct,t. ion : Aux. Bldg. 40 yrs. except 1 Test requihek El. (-) 5'0" Easket P.D.L. every 7 yrs. Zone A17 40 Years (7 yrs.) Flood Level Elev:
'Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence no 8 Documentation
References:
Notes: This compenent must function in a radiation (only) environment.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No.. QTR-111 dated'10/1/81
. i I
\
ll6-b 5/20/83
s :
.y.,
'\ ~ 116-B 3 ,g 3 ,
i '
\
1983 TER No. _ 68
\
Date: 5/20/83 _ EQUIPMENTENVIRONMENTALQUAl.ITICATION
~'
s SER/TER REVIEk'
.. , Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 r s.
J I) Summary of new information on SCEk' sheet.
- SCEWS 116-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed.
II) SEE concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B Respinse: g r a III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification - Response: See I above 4
'IV)' Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A
' i
,, -s x .,
/ .
-2 V) Justification *for continued operation'. N/A
; s.
^'N Reaffirmed R'evised n
c, 'New -
\;
se
. . ~
Fccility: Littons Nucincr Pr. Sta. SYSTEM COMPONENT EViu UATION WORK SHEET l Unit: Two Docket: 50-336 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT MENTATIOf REF* METHOD ITEMS EQUIPMENT DESCPlPTION } Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. ( Sequential System: Primary Drain Operating Continuous Continuous P 1 Test Plant ID No.: ZS-9016 Time l [ Ccmponent: Temperature Limit switch (Or) NAMCO Pressure l Manufacture: l (PSIA) Model Number: EA740-20100 Felative i Humidity (%) Function: Position l indication & valve ~ Chemical control Spray Accuracy: 8
- S*"
- Radiation 2.04X10 R 1 S rvice Test Primary drain tank discharge isol 1.94x106R c,L 40 yrs. Sequential 0$h$$ement Incation: A9in9 Test & required Aux
- Bld9 ' 40 Years except P.D.L. 1 every 7 yrs .
El (-) 5'0" gasket Analysis (7 yrs.) Zone A17 Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence nn Notes: This component must function in a radiation 8Cocumentation
References:
(only) environment.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No1 QTR-111 dated 10/1/81 119-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. Il9-B l 1 1983 TER No. _ 68 bate: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 i
\
I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. l SCEWS 119-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed, l
. 1 II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B l Response: g, , 7 l
III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
r acility: Llgtone Naclear Pr. Sta Y m COMPONENT E L UATION WORK Shssi Jnit Two - xx:kst 50-336 , . . . .... 2 OUTSTANDING QUAL. DOCUMENTATION REF ITEMS EfMIRONMENT METHOD EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Spec. Qual. Parameter Spec. Qual. Sequential P 1 Test Operating Continuous Continuous RCS fy; tem: Time 31 tnt ID No.: ZS-505 Temperature Component: Limit switch (op) Pressure Manufrcture: (PSIA) Modsl Number: EA740-20100 Relative Humidity (s) Function: Position Chemical indication & valve control N/A Accur:cy: Service: O I 1 valv:: 6 C,L Test 2.12x10 R Gasket Aux. Bldg. 40 yrs. Sequential replacement Aging except 1 required Y -7*5'0" 40 Years gasket P.D.L. Test & Analysis every 7 yrs. Zone A18 (7 yrs.) Flood Level Elev: NA NA NA Suhnergence NA NA NA Abova Flood Level: Yes Mn Notes: This component must function in a radiation CDocumentation
References:
(only) environment.
- 1. NAMCO Qualification Test Report No. QTR-111 dated 10/1/81 120-B 5/20/83
~
SCEWS No. 1983 TER No. __ 68 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sum =ary of new information on SCEW sheet. SC;..iS 120-B is revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Categury I.B
Response
S s III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
Docket: 50-336 3 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF ME'HIOD ITEMS EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Sequential System Containment Press. Operating . l',2,3 Test Plant ID No.: Time Continuous Continuous PT-8238,8239 Simulta-Component: Pressure Temperature Profiles neous Transmitter ( F) 1,3 Test 112'F 28,31 A Pressure Simulta-Manufacture: Foxboro neous (PSIA) Profiles Modal Number: 0.6 PSIG 28,31 A,H 1,3 Test NE11GM-11Cl-L-C-F Simulta-Relative Profiles neous Humidity (%) A. 1,3 Test 100% 28,31 , Function: Wide range '
' Chemical Simulta-pressure indication neous Spray Profile
' NA 1 Test Accuracy: 0.5% span NA 15 Radiation Sequential service: Post 8 accident monitoring 2.22x106R 2.2 x 10 R C 2 Test Aging See summary Location: Aux. Bldg. * ""
elev. (-) 5 ' 0" A17, A18 40 years P.D.L. Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Foxboro Test Report T3-1013
- 2. Foxboro Test Report T3-1068
- 3. Foxboro Test Report T3-6061 121-B 11-1-80
I
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 121B SCEW SHEET NO. 121B DATE: 8/21/81 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Containment Pressure Transmitters PT-8238, 8239 MANUFACTURER: Foxboro Model NEllGM-llCl-L-C-F
.s These components lack documented radiation and QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY:
time / temperature aging qualification. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: This equipment functions to provide vide range pust accident indication of containment pressure. Due to the present age of this equipment, and to the severity of the environmental test on this equipment in the as new condition, reasonable assurance is provided that the equipment will perform its design function. Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. Refer to Generic Replacement Schedule 2.
==...e_...e.a.. . . . . . * , .M..a.....== m=*
o SCEWS No. 121-B 1983 TER No. 46 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMDITAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category 1.B , i Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See III IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF2 QUAL. OtrFSTANDING Qual. j Parameter Spec. Spec. Qual. System Simulta- { Sy; tem: Rad Monitoring Operatin9 Design neous Plant ID No.: ZlRM8240/ Time Continuous Continuous (P.A.M.) 1.a) Test B,C - Z2RtiG241/B,C l Component: Coaxial cable Temperature Simulta-I l pp) neous Profile 20 Profile 39 A,D 1.a) Test Manufacture: Pressure Simulta-Rockbestos Co. (PSIA) neous Model Number: RSS 6-104 Note 1 Profile 39 A 1.a) Test Design Simulta-Relative Humidity (%) Require- neous Function: Rad monitoring 100% 100% ment. 1.a) Test ,
~
cable ' chemical Spray Accuracy: Not required 8 NA NA NA NA NA Service: Low level signal Radiation circuits NA NA NA NA NA Location: Various areas Aging Plant outside containment Design Sequential
. 40 Yrs. .
40 Yrs. Life 1.c) Test Flood Ievel Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Submergence un (Documentation
References:
Notes: The HELB accident pressure in the west MSIV
- 1. Rockbestos report " Qualification of Firewall III Room is less than 2 psig which lasts for less coaxial constructions dated January 18, 1978". than thirteen (13) seconds. This environmental a) Page 2, Par. IV pressure / time parameter is considered insignifi-c) Page 2, Par. II cant regarding cable operability.
e 122-B 5/20/83
SCEWS No. 122-B 1983 TER No. 73 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
- 1) Changed Note 1 for clarification.
- 2) General changes II) SER concerns:
Equipment in NRC Category II.A .
Response
Same as III. III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established.
Response
See attached. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 122-B 1983 TER No. 73 Date 5/20/83 III) Response: NNECO has reviewed the qualification test report (Firewall III, 2/18/78) and the test anomaly indicated by the radiation monitor manufacturer. Several meetings have been held with the cable manufacturer (Rockbestos Company) to discuss the operability of the coaxial cable in the west MSIV Room. The cable manufacturer has stated that due to the short time duration the cable would never reach the accident temperature (326*F). A review of the accident profile of temperature versus time would conclude that the cable manufacturer is correct. The MSIV Room accident profile is #20. In the profile the peak temperature is 326*F which takes ten (10) seconds to reach, after this point it decays to 230*F in 50 seconds and to 200*F in 90 seconds. The cable manufacturer has stated that the maximum limiting temperatures by type test is 230*F to 250'F. Being conservative l and choosing 230'F as the limit, the temperature difference is only 94*F for a time duration of 50 seconds. Due to the overall thermal capacitance of the cable and other equipment in the area (heat sinks) the temperature difference and time duration is l judged insignificant. Therefore, it is NNECO's engineering j judgement that this cable is qualified for its intended safety function.
Docket 50-336 , DOCUMENTATION REF2 QUAL. OLirafANDING ENVIRONNENT EQUIPDEnfT DESCRIPTION NETHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Sy2tes: Reactor Cooling Operating Note 2. 2.) Sequential Continuou5 Continuous Test Plant ID No.: RC403,RC405 Time Temperature Simulta-Component: Valve Motor Operations (OF) Profile Profile neous 18 11 D 2.b) Test Nanufacture: Pressure Simulta-Limitorque (PSIA) Profile Profile D 2.c) neous Model Number SMB-000 19 11A Test S/N's 156210,156209,0rder No. 363562A Relative Simultd-Humidity (t) neous Function: Pressure relief 100 100 1. . 2.d) Test . isolation valve operators ' chemical Simulta-Spray 2400 PPM neous Accuracy: Not required Boron Note 1. F 2.e) Test Service: Porv block valve Radiation Sequential 8 1.5 x 10 2.04x108R K,L 2.f) Test Incation: Containment Aging Plant EL 38'6" Design Sequential J 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. Life 2.9) Test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
Notes: 1. Table 1, IEEE STD 382, Page 12
- 1. Bechtel Technical Spec. 7604-M-223A 2. Must operate intermittently during a TMI type 7604-E-40, 7604-E-11B event to block and unblock porv as required.
- 2. Limitorque Project Report 600456, June 7, 1974 to November 22, 1974 a) Page 25 b) Fig. 6 .
c) Fig. 5 d) Par. 3.4.2 e) Par. 4.( ,2 f) Par. 4.3. g) Par 3.1.1 1-C 5/20/83
d
~
SCEWS No. 1983 TER No. __ 5 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336
-1) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet.
Revised. qualified life and operability parameters. Added Model Number. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A i Response: Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established. Response: See attached
- IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule.
N/A V)~ Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS Na, 1-C 5/20/83 III) Response to TER Concerns: A) Model Number is included on SCEWS 1-C, see Item I above. The following is in response to Page 5f, FRC Item 5 1 - Letter from manufacturer which demonstrates similarity is and has been available for audit per the requirements of I & E Bulletin 79-01B. FRC did not request this information via NRC request for additional information (RFAI) dated January 6, 1982. 2 - Class RH 3 - No motor brake 4 - Not applicable 5 - Reliance 6 - Not applicable 7 - A.C. - This was included in the October, 1980 submittal. Appendix I, sheet 28A and B. 8 - Not applicable 9 - Revised qualified life / operability times. See Item I above. In addition to these items, FRC should note that the equipment was type tested and determination of individual constituents is irrelevant. Also note that Teflon was used as " Field Cable" in certain Limitorque Tests. B) Again, as with "A" above, details of the Radiation, Ihermal and Mechanical Aging Programs is and has been available for audit in accordance with I&E Bulletin 79-01B. This information was not requested by FRC via NRC RFAI dated January 6, 1982.
EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ENVIR0letENT DOCUNENTATION REF2 QUAL. OtffSTANDING Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. Systems: Reactor Coolant Operating Plant ID No.: Time PT-103 Component: Temperature Simulta-l Pressure Transmitter (OF) Profile Profile neous i 18 318'F D 1,34 Test l Manufar ture : Foxboro Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile Profile neous Modal Number: EllGM 19 90 PSl D 1,34 Test Relative Simulta-Humidity (%) Profile neous Function: Low range 100 100% 1,34 Test . pressurizer press. ' Chemical See summary Spray 2400 PPM sheet 2C Accuracy: + 0.5% B ron F Service Radiation See summary 8.2x10 6R K sheet 2C Location: CTMT (-) 5' Aging See summary rack C-140 C-5 40 yrs. P.D.L sheet 2C Flood Level Elev: -14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Suhnergence NA NA NA NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
Notes: PT-103 S/N 2602027
- 1. Foxboro Test Report Q-9-6005 4
e 2-C 11-1-80
2C
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. SCEW SHEET NO.
. DATE: 5/20/83
, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 BQUIPMENT: Low Range Pressurizer Pressure Transmitters PT-103 Foxboro E-llGM MANUFACTURER: QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: This equipment lacks documented qualification data concerning resistance to chemical spray and radiation exposure. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: PT-103 provides signal input for the post accident monitoring, subcooling margin monitor. This component serves as post accident low range presurizer pressure monitor This equipment also functions to provide overpressure protection for the shutdown cooling system. The post accident subcooling margin monitor, will alarm a pressure input failure which indicates to the operator that this system should not be used for any safety related function. The overpressure protection for the shutdown cooling system is provided for in the plant operating procedures and ensured through administrative controls. Wide range monitors are also available to provide operating personnel with pressurizer pressure indication for shutdown cooling system initiation.
SCEWS No. 2-C 1983 TER No. Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See IV below. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of 1983 refueling outage scheduled to commence in May 1983, V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New .
Docket: 50-336 DOCUMENTATION REF3 QUAL. OUFSTANDING ENVIIONMENT EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. See summary Operating continuous sheet SC System: RCS Plant ID No. : TE112ilA-D, Time TE122HA-D,TE112CA-D, TE122CA-D See summary component: Connection Temperature Profile 16, FF) 18 D 1 sheet 5C Head Manufactures Rosemount Pressure Profile 16 D 1 See summary Model Number: (TE112HC- sheet SC 104ADA 104AFC-1) ' nelative 100% D See summary Humidity (t) 1 sheet SC Function: RCS loop temp. ~ RTD Cable Termination ' chemical 2400 ppm Spray boron F 1 See summary
' sheet SC Accuracy:
Service: Radiation 1.5 X'10 I. See summary K 1 sheet SC Imention: CTMr C-5 Aging See summary 40 yrs. P.D.L. sheet SC Flood Level Elev: (-)14 '4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Above Flood Level: Yes > Submergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes: i 1, 8-27-79 letter from J. Graham, Rosemount Engineering t to R. K. McCarthy 9 e 5-C 11-1-80
SIDelARY SEEET NO. SC SCEW SHEET NO. SC Rev. 2 8/18/83 , RQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATI0h DISCREPANT NUIPMENT SIDE (ARY MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: RCS loop temperature RTD connection heads TE-112CA-CD TE-112HA-HD TE-122CA-CD TE-122HA-HD MANUFACTURER: Rosemount QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented qualification data. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components provide protection for the cable terminations of the referenced RTD's. These RTD's provide control room indication of the monitored parameters and RPS input for the thermal margin / low pressure trip setpoint determinations. Reasonable assurance that these components will provide the required protection is provided by Reference 1 on system component evaluation work sheet. . Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. 6
SCEWS No. 5-C 1983 TER No. 81 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 X) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B Response: Same as III , III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
Justification for continued operation reviewed and remains valid. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised New
- e. . _ - . . , , . _ _ _ . . . - _ , . _ - , ._ ._. . - . -
Docket: 50-336 QUAL. OursfANDING ENVIR0tGEENT DOCUMENTATION REF8 NE"fMOD ITEMS EQUIPIN!NT DESCRIPTION spec. Qual. spec. Qual. _ _ m EE Sil 454 Parameter Sequential System Aux. Feed Water Operating Test l',2,3 Plant ID No. : ET-5277, Time Continuous Continuous 5278 Simulta-Component: Dif ferential ature neous Profile Profile pressure transmitter F) 1,3 Test 326*F 28,31 20A Pressure Simulta-stanufacture: Foxboro neous (PSIA) Profile Modal Number: NE13Dil 28,31 A 1,3 Test 1.8 PSIG Simultd-anlative neous Humidity (g) Profile 100 28,31 A 1,3 Test -
. Function: Aux. feed '
Simulta-flow indication Chemical Spray Profile neous Accuracy: =0.5% ' NA 15 NA 1 Test service: Radiation Sequential 8 Test 2.2 x 10 R 2 Loc *.; tion: Zone A-51 Aging See summary 40 yrs. P.D.L. sheet 8C Flood Level Elev: Above Flood Level: Yes Suisnergence un
- Documentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Foxboro Test Report T3-1013
- 2. Foxboro Test Report T3-1068
- 3. Foxboro Test Report T3-6061 e
8-C 11-1-80
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 8C SCEW SHEET NO.
' DATE: 8/21/81 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIFMENT: Differential pressure transmitters for auxiliary feedwater flow indication FT-5277, 5278 HANUFACTURER: Foxboro Model NE-13DH QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: These components lack documented radiation and time / temperature aging qualification. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: These components provide indication of auxiliary feedwater flow. An independent laboratory has been contracted by NUSCO to provide radiation ' "'
/ cnd' time / temperature aging analysis of this equipment.
-
- Due to to present age of this equipment, and severity of the as new test, reasonable assurance is provided that the equipment will perform its function.
Due to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices. Refer to Generic Re'lacement p Schedule 2. l l l l l l l l
SCEWS No. 8-C 1983 TER No. Date: 8/18/83 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION l SER/TER REVIEW Nd11 stone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category 1.B -
Response
Same as 111 III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See IV IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Equipment to be replaced with fully qualified equipment prior to the end of the 1985 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. X Reaffirmed Revised
,New
~~~
Docket: 50-336 QUAL. OUTSTANDING ENVIR0lGEENT DOCUNENTATION REF2 EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION NE"nIOD ITENS i EEQ SH 450 452 Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. m Sequential Systems Main Steam Operating rest Continuous Continuous 4 l' Plant ID No. : LT-1113B,C,D Time LT-1123B,C,D Simulta-Component: Differential Temperature 350*F neous pressure transmitter ( F) Profile Test 18 D 1 Foxboro Pressure Simulta-Nanufacture (PSIA) Profile 85 psig neous 19 D 1 Test N-E13DM Simultd-Relative neous Humidity (%) 100 100 1 Test Function: Steam genera- ~ Chemical Simulta-tor level Spray 2400 PPM 3000 ppm neous
' Boron F 1 Test Accuracy: 0.5% span Boron Service: Radiation Sequential 8 1 6
8.2 x 10 R 2.O x 10 R K Test Aging 1) 10 y rs . Sequential See Notes Inc tion: CTMT 14'6" C-5 40 yrs. 2) 9 yrs. P.D.L. 1 1&2 Test Flood Level Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Submergence NA NA NA NA NA un eDocumentation
References:
Notes:
- 1. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 45592-4 dated 5/18/83 1. Transmitter qualified life is 10 years.
- 2. Viton "0" Ring for transmitter cover is qualified
- 4. MPII FSAR Table 7.5.2 for 9 years at 120*F, however, must be replaced each time cover is removed.
9-C 8-18-83
SCEWS No. 9-C 1983 TER No. _ Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 9-C revised to reflect fully qualified equipment installed. II) SER concerns: None .
Response
III) TER concerns: None
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
SCEWS No. 14-C 1983 TER No. 44 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW j Millstone Unit 2 l Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. SCEWS 14-C is deleted. See attached justification. II) SER concerns: N/A ,
Response
111) TER concerns: N/A
Response
IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. j V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reaffirmed Revised New
i. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION Millstone Unit 2 4 1 D21ete SCEW Sheet No. 14C System: PRS Plant ID: PS-4597 A, B, C, D Component: Pressure Switch , MFGR: Custom Component Modal: CCS-604GR6-3565 FCTN: , Turbine Trip input to RPS Location: Til This equipment operates to input to the Reactor Protection System (RPS) 4 a signal that the turbine generator has tripped, due to any cause. The harsh environment to which this equipment is exposed is caused by a high energy pipe break in the turbine building. This event would cause a turbine trip to be generated by the RPS, and failure of this equipment would not adversely affect the operation of any Class IE equipment. WHB/psn 5/10/82
Docket: 5- 336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONME'3T DOCUMENTATION REF) QUAL. OUTSTANDING
. t METHOD ITEMS 1 Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Sy; tem: Radiation Monit. Operating Simulta-Plant ID No.: Time 2a neous RE 8240, 8241 Continuous Continuous 1 Test Components liigh range Temperature Simulta-radiation detector ( F) Profile a neous 18 340*F D Test Manufacture Pressure Simulta-General Atomic (PSIA) Profile neous Model Number: RD-23 2a 19 70 PSIG D Test Relative Simulta-Humidity (%) ne us 2a Fc.netion: Accident / post 100% 100% D Test , l
' Chemical
~
accident radiation Simulta-monitoring Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM 2a neous Accuracy: + 3% ' Boron Boron F Test l Service: , Radiation Test and c 1.5 x 108 R 2.0 x 10 8R
, K Analysis Incation: CTMT Aging elev. 18'6" 2b Tee t and
, 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. PDL -Analysis Flood Imvel Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flec4 I4 vel: Yes X Suhnergence NA NA NA I'A NA NA un CDocumentation
References:
- 1. Millstone II FSAR Table 7.5.2
- 2. General .itemic Test:Repert, Class lE Tecting of Analog high'Ra% e Padiatian Monitor E-254-960.a)AP3X1 b)iPDE 4.
c)pg 20 Seetion 4.1,.. 15-C d-21-81
SCEWS Eo. 15-C 1982 TER No. 34 Date: 8/18/83 III) Response to TER Concerns:
- 1. The Detector Assembly (RD-23) is identical to the test spectmen.
The connector / cable interface is an Amphenol 83-816-1000 HN
' connector and RSS-6-104 (1081) coaxial cable with WCSF-N Raychem tubing. The termination was made in accordance to General Atomic procedure as outlined in the test report and shown on page 12 of said report.
The cable has been requalified by the Rockbestos Company and is indicated on SCEW Sheet 37-A Thermal aging of this cable has been addressed, (see SCEWS 37-A). i l The connectors are all metal except for the insulator and gasket materials which are teflon. However, the entire connector cable assembly is covered with Raychem tubing as stated earlier. Therefore, aging and radiation is not considered to be significant due to the small quantities of teflon. The Raychem material has been qualified by type test. - Testing was performed on the connector / cable and Raychem tubing which is method four (4) page 11 of General Atomic Test Report. 2.
,The Detector Assembly (RD-23 ) is inorganic, refer to Table 3-1 Page 6 of General Atomic Test Report. The cable is not qualified by the manufacturer as second generation coaxial cable. The connector is all retal and the teflon material is used only in a static condition not subjected to any movement.
I'- 3. See response one above for connector aging justification. NNECO ha's-establiched the similarity link between equipment installed v
' and test specimen. These pieces of equipment are considered fully qualif ied .
i
/
e s 4
\
t
SCEWS No. 15-C 1983 TER No. _ 34 Date: 8/18/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Nor:e : II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category II.A 88Ponse: 33,, ,,777, III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification not established. Response: See attached. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Ruffirmed Revised New e
Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF2 QUAL. OttfSTANDING METHOD ITEMS
._ Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Simulta-System: Post Accid. Monit. Operating i neous Plant ID No.: LT-6242, Time Continuous Continuous 1 Test 8243 Component: Level Trans- Temperature Simulta-Profile 1 neous mitter ( F) 18 381 F D Test Manufacture: GEM Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile i neous Mod 31 Number: 19 60 PSIG D Test XM-54852 Relative Simulta-Humidity (t) neous 100% 100% D 1 Test Function: Containment _ sump level indication ' Chemical Simulta-Spray 2400 PPM 3000 ppm neous
' i Accuracy: Boron Boron F Test Service: Post accident Radiation Sequential 1
monitoring 1.5 x 108 R 2.0 x 10 8R K Test Inc tion: CTMT Aging Sequential elev . (-) 22 ' 6"-(-)l5 ' 6" 40 Yrs. 40 Yrs. PDL 1 Test l Flood Level Elev (-)l4'4" 78-771- Sequential Above Flood Level: Yes Suhnergence 14' 4" 14' 4" 162-GM Test Nn Y l CDocumentation
References:
Notes: '
- l. Wyle Qualification Test Report
#45700-2, dated 12/14/82 a
SCEWS No. 16-C 1983 TER No. 57 Date: 5/20/83 . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. Added documentation reference to complete qualification. II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification
Response
See I above IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. N/A V) Justification for continued operation. N/A Reeffirmed Revised New
Docket: 50-336 DOCUMElffATION REF* QUAL. h iANDING ENVIR0teg2rr
@ M DESCRIPTION ME1110D ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual.
Simulta- See PZR relief valve Operating s Su m ry Systems monitors Plant ID No. : ZS200,201, Time Test Sneet 17-C Continuous Continuous 402,404 Simulta- see Component: Accelerometer Temperature ( F) Profile neous Summary 16,18 Profile 41 D Test Sheet 17-C Pressure Simulta- See Manufacture: Endevco (PSIA) Profile neous Summary Model Number: 2273AM20 16,19 Profile 42 D Test Sheet 17-C Simulta- See Relative neous Summary Humidity (4) Sheet 17-C 100% 100% D Test , Function: Post accident monitoring ' Chemical Simulta- See Summary Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous Sheet 17-C Accuracy: Boron Boron F Test - See Summary Service: Pory discharge Radiation Sequential Sheet 17-C line monitoring 1.5 x 10 8R 2 x 10 8R K Test Incations CTMT C-5 Aging Plant See Summary To Be Design Sequential Sheet 17-C
, 40 yrs. . Determined Life Test Flood Invel Elev:(-)14'4" Above Flood Level: Yesx Submergence un cDocumentation
References:
Notes: e 17-C 5/20/83 4
SUMMARY
SBEET NO. 17-C SCEV SHEET NO. 17-C _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Acoustic lionitor: Acceleroineter MANUFACTURER: Endevco QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: Equipment qualification not established. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: See attached.
IIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION:
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 17--C SCEV SHEET NO. 17-C Rev. 3 5/20/83 This equipment has been procured on a risk release basis pending completion of vendor qualification testing. To date Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) has gone through several qualification efforts without success. In light of all the various difficulties the B & W testing have encountered, NNECO has decided to install the Technology for Energy Corporation (TEC) Acoustic Valve-Position Indicator System. The basic design of the systems are identical except for the Charge Amplifier and associated housing. Therefore, NNECO has a high degree of confidence that the present system would perform its safety related function in an accident scenario. The reason being that the actual test profile is much more severe than the plant's design accident profile. There is significant margin between profiles. The equipment modificatio'n and/or change outs will be performed during the 1984 refueling outage. The qualification documentation references will be identified at that time and submitted to the NRC for review if required. The qualified life for this equipment will be determined in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 guidelines. The present equipment was installed as part of the TMI Action Plan under Item 2.1.3a and was required to be operational by 1/1/81. .
SCEWS No. 17-C 1983 TER No. 33 Date: S/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification Response: Justification for continued operation added. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Fully qualified equipment will be installed prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised X New
- , _ ~ , _ . - -
Docket: 50-336 ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF3 QUAL. OUTSTANDING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION METHOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. i PZR relief valve Simulta- See Summary Sy; tem monitors Operating Sheet 18-C m us Plant ID No. : ZS-200,201, Time ntinu us Continuous Test 402,404 Component: Cable Temperature Simulta- See Summary (OF) Profile neous Sheet 18-C 16,18 Profile 41 D Test l Manufacture: Harline Pressure Simulta- See Summary Cable Endevco (PSIA) Profile neous Sheet IS-C Model Number: 3075M6 16,19 Profile 42 D Test Relative Simulta- See Summary Humidity (%) e us Sheet 18-C 100% 100% D. Test Function: Post accident ~ monitoring 'cienical Simulta- See Summary Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous Sheet 18-C Accuracy: Boron Boron F Test Service: Porv discharge Radiation Sequential See Summary line monitorin8 1.5 x 108 R 2 x 108 R K Test Sheet 18-C Incation: CTMT C-5 Aging Plant See Summary To Be Design Sequential Sheet 18-C
- 40 yrs. -
Determined Life Test Flood Ievel Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence Nn cDocumentation
References:
Notest.
- 1. Babcock & Wilcox, valve monitoring system, test program 3-21-80.
e 5/20/83 18-C
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 18-C 18-C SCEW SHEET NO. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Acoustic Monitor: Cable MANUFACTURER: Endevco QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: Equipment qualification not established. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: See attached.
SAFETT FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION MR CWTM OPERATION:
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 18-C SCEW SHEET NO. 18-C Rev. 3 5/20/83 This equipment has been procured on a risk release basis pending completion of vendor qualification testing. To date Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) has gone through several qualification efforts without success. In light of all the various difficulties the B & W testing have encountered, NNECO has decided to install the Technology for Energy Corporation (TEC) Acoustic Valve-Position Indicator System. The basic design of the nystems are identical except for the Charge Amplifier and associated housing. Therefore, NNECO has a high degree of confidence that the present system would perform its safety related function in an accident scenario. The reason being that the actual test profile is much more severe than the plant's design accident profile. There is significant margin between profiles. The equipment modification and/or change outs will be performed during the 1984 refueling outage. The qualification documentation references will be identified at that time and submitted to the NRC for review if required. The qualified life for this equipment will be determined in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 guidelines. The present equipment was installed as part of the TMI Action P,lan under Item 2.1.3a and was required to be operational by 1/1/81. ,
SCEWS No. 18-C 1983 TER No. 69 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I)- Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B .
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification. Response: Justification for continued operation added. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Fully qualified equipment will be installed prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised New
Docket: 50-336 2 QUAL. OtratANDING NN DOCUNENTATION REF EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION METWOD ITEMS Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. See Summary PZR relief valve Simulta- Sheet 19-C System monitors operating ne us Plant ID No. : ZS-200,201 Time Test Continuous Continuous 402,404 Simulta- See Summary Coeponent: Preamplifier Temperature Profile neous Sheet 19-C ( F) Test 16,18 Profile 41 D Pressure Simulta-Manufacture : Unholtz- See Summary Dickie (PSIA) Profile neous Test Sheet 19-C Model Number: 22CA-ZTR 16,19 Profile 42 D Simulta- See Summary Relative ne us Sheet 19-C Humidity (4) Test 100% 100% D . Function: Post accident ' monitoring ' Chemical Simulta- See Summary spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous Sheet 19-C
' Test Accuracy: Boron Baron F See Summary ,
Service: Porv discharge Radi>; tion Sequential Sheet 19-C line monitoring 1.5 x 108 R 2 x 108 R K Test Incation: CTMT C-5 Aging Plant See Summary To Be Design Sequential Sheet 19-C
- 40 yrs. Determined Life Test Flood Level Elev:(-)l4'4" Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence un -
cDocumentation
References:
Notes: O 5/20/83 19-C
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 19-C
~
SCEV SHEET NO. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT: Acoustic Monitors: Preamplifier MANUFACTURER: Unholtz-Dickie QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: Equipment qualification not established. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: See attached.
RAFETT FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION
SUMMARY
SHEET No. 19-C MA CONTINUED OPERATION: SCEV SHEET NO. 19-C Rev. 3 5/20/83 This equipment has been procured on a risk release basis pending completion of vendor qualification testing. To date Babcock & .lcox (B&W) has gone through several qualification efforts without success. In light of all the various difficulties the B & W testing have encountered, NNECO has decided to install the Technology for Energy Corporation (TEC) Acoustic Valve-Position Indicator System. The basic design of the systems are identical except for the Charge Amplifier and associated housing. Therefore, NNECO has a high degree of confidence that the present system would perform its safety related function in an accident scenario. The reason being that the actual test profile is much more severe than the plant's design accident profile. There is significant margin between profiles. The equipment modification and/or change outs will be performed during the 1984 refueling outage. The qualification documentation references will be identified at that time and submitted to the NRC for review if required. The qualified life for this equipment will be determined in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 guidelines. The present equipment was installed as part of the TMI Action Plan under Item 2.1.3a and was required to be operational by 1/1/81. _
SCEWS No. 19-C 1983 TER No. 32 Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Summary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns: Equipment in NRC Category I.B
Response
Same as III III) TER concerns: Equipment qualification pending modification.
Response
Justification for continued operation added. IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Fully qualified equipment will be installed prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised X y,y [
Docket: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF3 QUAL. OLFPSTAFDING Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. PZR reilef valve See Summary Simulta System monitors Operating neous Sheet 20-C Plant ID No. : ZS-200,201 Time Continuous Continuous Test 402,404 Component: Junction Box Temperature Simulta- See Summary (OF) Profile neous Sheet 20-C l 16,18 Profile 41 D Test Manufacture: Hoffman Pressure Simulta-(PSIA) Profile neous See Summary Model Number: 8064 CHNESS 16,19 Profile 42 D Test Sheet 20-C Relative Simulta- See Summary Humidity (%) "" "8 Sheet 20-C est Function: Post accident . monitoring ' chemical Simulta- See Summary Spray 2400 PPM 3000 PPM neous
' Sheet 20-C Accuracy: Boron Boron F Test See Summary Service: Porv discharge Radiation Sequential Sheet 20-C line monitoring 1.5 x 108 R 2 x 108 R K Test Incation: CTMT C-5 Aging Plant See Summary To Be Design Sequential Sheet 20-C
- 40 yrs. -
Determined Life Test Flood Ievel Elev:(-)14'4" l Above Flood Level: Yes X Subnergence ;
- l l
i
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 5/20/83 20-C - - - - - - - - - - -
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. 20-C ; i SCEW SHEET AO. 20-C l I 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 l EQUIPMENT: Acoustic Monitors: Termination Box MANUFACTURER: Hoffman QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: Equipment qualification not established. SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION: See attached.
M FUNCTION Y JU M TION US '.ARY SHEET NO. 20-C FOR CONTINUID OPERATION: 20-C SCEW SHEET NO. Rev. 3 5/20/F3 This equipment has been procured on a risk release basis pending completion of vendor qualification testing. To date Babcock & Wilcox (BLU) has gone through several qualification efforts without success. In light of all the various dif ficulties the B & W testing have encountered, NNECO has decided to install the Technology for Energy Corporation (TEC) Acoustic Valve-Position Indicator Syster. The basic design of the systems are identical except for the Charge Amplifier and associated housing. Therefore, NNECO has a high degree of confidence that the present system would perform its saf ety related function in an accident scenario. The reason being that the actual test profile is much more severe than the plant's design accident profile. There is significant margin between profiles. The equipment modification and/or change outs will be performed during the 1984 refueling outage. The qualification documentation references will be identified at that time and submitted to the NRC for review if required. The qualified lif e f or this equip =ent will be determined in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 guidelines. The present equiprent was installed as part of the TMI Action Plan under Item 2.1.3a andwas required to be operational by 1/1/S1.
SCEWS No. 20-C
~
1983 TER No. _ J Date: 5/20/83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIPICATION Y SER/TER REVIEW Millstone Unit 2 Docket No. 50-336 I) Sunnary of new information on SCEW sheet. None II) SER concerns:
Response
III) TER concerns: Responce: IV) Proposed corrective action and schedule. Fully qualified equipment will'be installed prior to the end of the 1983 refueling outage. i l V) Justification for continued operation. Reaffirmed Revised X New
- wx zm.urre rvuuxessa rso a um o -
Unit: Two SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET Dockst: 50-336 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ENVIRONMENT DOCUMENTATION REF* QUAL. OUTSTANDING Parameter Spec. Qual. Spec. Qual. System: Radiation Monito ' Operating Continuous P see Summary Plcnt ID No.: C86, C87 Time Sheet 22C 1 Component: H 2 Analyzer Temperature (OF) i Manufacture: Bechtel Pressure (PSIA) Mod:rl Number: 7604-M-442 Relative Humidity (%) Function l Monitor H Concentration Chemical 2 Spray Accuracy: 15% of Scale l Service: Radiation less than 6
" b "*'
9 X 10 Loc 2 tion: Aux. Bldg. Aging see Summary El ev. 14 ' 6" Sheet 22C Fire Zone: A26 . 40 yrs. PDL Flood Level Elev: N/A Above Flood Level: Yes Subnergence nn
- Documentation
References:
Notes: 8/18/83 22-c
SUMMARY
SHEET NO. SCEW SHEET RO. 22C EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DISCREPANT EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 EQUIPMENT Hydrogen Analyzers
- sample equipment C87, C88 MANUFACTURER: Bechtel QUALIFICATION DISCREPANCY: Lacks Radiation Oualifications SAFETY FUNCTION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION:
This equipment is required to sample containment atmosphere for analysis as part of the Hydrogen Analyzers, n is equipment was assembled by Bechtel during plant construction and consists of solenoid valves, metal bellows pump and a refrigeration unit. The radiation sensitive electronics have been relocated to a mild environment. The equipment which remains in a harsh radiation (only) environment is of good quality commercial grade. Utilization of this equipment is authorized by Reg. Guide 1.97
)
DOCUMENT REFERENCE LIST SUPPLEMENT A. Bechtel Nuclear Staff Calculation 532-27-11867 Rev. 0: Computer Run x3022, 11/3/79. B. The Chemical solution consists of 3000 PPM Boron as Boric Acid in solution with 0.064 Molar Sodium Thiosulfate buffered with Sodium Hydroxide to a PH of between 9 and 10 at Room Temperature. C. NUSCO response to NUREG-0578-Section 2.1.6b, Attachment 2, Summary Sheets, W. G. Counsil to H. R. Denton, December 31, 1979. D. NUSCO memorandum C. J. Gladding to R. J. DeRosa GME-80-274 dated February 29, 1980. E. NUSCO memorandum C. J. Gladding to R. J. DeRosa GME-80-701 dated May 16, 1980. F. NUSCO memorandum S. J. Weyland to R. J. DeRosa GME-80-643 dated May 1, 1980. G. E. The peak pressure is less than 1 psig for a duration of about 13 seconds. This is considered insignificant. I. NUSCO memorandum C. J. Gladding to R. J. DeRosa GME-80-863 dated July 7, 1980. J. K. NUSCO nemorandum D. Miller to R. J. DeRosa, NEE-79-E-281 dated May 21, '1979. L. NUSCO memorandum H. W. Siegrist to R. J. DeRosa NEE-80-RA-496 dated September 8, 1980. M. NUSCO memorandum H. W. Siegrist to R. J. DeRosa NEE-80-RA-519 dated September 16, 1980. N. NUSCO memorandum Ralph Bates to R. J. DeRosa dated September 11, 1980. P. " Operating Time" specification information is not noted either because it was not originally specified or could not be readily found. In all cases the qualified operating time adequately covers the equipment requirement.
MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL DEVICES A list of miscellaneous electrical devices has been developed from a review of the plant wireway drawings. The installed items have been inspected by plant walk-through for the purpose of specific identification cnd observation of conditions which could possibly cause circuit failure under eccident conditions (Reference 2). The types of equipment identified are: Ideal set screw connectors 3-M Scotch-Lok twist on type connectors General Electric type EB5 terminal blocks Compression and other type terminal blocks (unidentified) Safety switches Fuses Fuse Block Butt Splices Environmental qualification considerations regarding the above equipment are cs follows: Ideal Set Screw Connectors These devices are used inside and outside the containment. They are qualified inside the containment as shown on SCEW sheet 13A. Environmental conditions cutside the containment can exceed the conditions inside the containment only with respect to temperature which could reach 326 F. (Containment temperature can reach a maximum of 279 F). The ideal set screw connectors are rated at 150 C (302 F) for an indefinite length of time (document reference 3. and 5. of SCEW sheet 13A). Outside the containment, the ambient temp. would only exceed the rated value for less than one minute and is, therefore, considered insignificant especially since the connectors are housed in metal enclosures cnd would likely never reach the ambient temperature. 3-M Scotch-Lok Connectors These devices have been identified as being installed outside the containment only. l 1 An independent laboratory has been retained by NUSCO to perform an analysis of cnvironmental qualification of these connectors. Continued plant operation is justified since all connectors are installed in metal enclosures and it is unlikely that their environment would ever reach destructive levels. The temperature transient is relatively short lived and diminishes to less than 200 F in two minutes. Also, the conclusion reached in the reference a) observation and stated judgement is that the 3-M Skotch-Lok connector, when compared with the Ideal Set Screw connector is a better device for mechanical integrity and lower circuit leakage.
Miccallcnnou3 Elcctric21 Devic 2s Pcg2 2 Tarminal Blocks - GE EB-5 and other types (unidentified) Th: e devices have been identified as being installed only outside the c ntainment. No specific environmental qualification has been obtained. C:ntinued plant operation is justified, however, because the walk-through in:pection indicated that these blocks would have similar characteristics to cnes that successfully withstood LOCA simulation tests while energized with 525 volts AC. Dua to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in ecnformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices Refer to Generic Replacement Schedule 1. Butt Splices Th2se devices have been identified as being installed only inside the containment in one valve circuit. No specific qualification has been cbtained thus far, however, continued plant operation is justified for the following reasons: c) Inspection disclosed that quality, spacing and enclosure of the splice would likely preclude circuit failure resulting from an accident. b) Any known failure mode will cause the valve to move to the safe position. Dum to the desirability of long term operability of this equipment and in conformance with existing license requirements, they will be replaced with fully qualified devices Refer to Generic Replacement Schedule 1. Srfety Switches, Fuse Blocks and Fuses These devices are all associated with charging pump MP18Bl. They are required to be operable for two (2) hours into the event. They are exposed to a harsh radiological (only) environment of 5.25 X 105R - G.E. Test Report PAR 710-83-031 demonstrates qualification. R:ference a) NUSCO memorandum, J. M. Clark to R. J. DeResa GRE-80-233 dated October 14, 1980. 8/18/83
n - e Q 346*F/Il3 psig within SMIN LEGEND e m INSULATION RESISTANCE 346 - MEASUREMENT Rg 335 -
+- 335' F/96 psig t
3.8
- ikj 315 -
-- 315'F/69 psig ng na g u m -
h mw w
- 265'F/28 psig EE%
-a w 265 - v SI$w 280*F/70psig
.' y 8 within 10 SEC Ah 3F 212*F/O-5 psig IR O 212 - E E
=
@ =
ONCE PER WEEK a-s O 3 1 % O g
- 140 - IR
?
g 4 IR g 5 ? I I I I I I I I I I N l N 9 10 5 8 8.5 ll 11. 5 15 16 4 4 DAYS 30 ?
; -. SEC MIN HR HR HR HR HR HR DAYS 45 MIN DAYS s ELAPSED TIME :
r+
FIGURE 1. Specified temperature, pressure, and radie. tion test profile - FIRL Test Report F-C4020-1 This profile has been designated by the vendor as
" Confidential". Therefore, it has not been submitted with this package. It is available at Northeast Utilities for Audit, however.
PROFILE 3 11/1/80
i LOCA Profile - Spray continuously at rate of 0.15 spa 346*F/ll3 psig ( min) per square foot of spray area with WITHIN 3 TO 5 MIN solution of the following composition: 0.28 molar H 3B03 (3000 ppm boron) NaOH to make pH between 9-11 at 77,F.
'3 0 --
( = 335'F/93 psig 320 - ( - 315'F/69 psig
- 265'F/28 psig w
3 250 - - B
<r a 280*F/70 psig ( min ) E' WITHIN 10 SEC 212'F/O psig 3
i 200 -- ( / r l 1 t
'^ ~
l l I I i t i 10 3 5 8 11 1 15 4! I F SEC HR HR HR HR HR 4 DAYS 30 l TIME & DAYS Rockno ror Co. ** % A u r M N N D/* FAf CWns 4 2V CLAJr /f \ \ E/Ecrx/c cA.0L es PR7ED P+?? ppnsnt u .
I
..' ! ' i I !
-I
{g . . . . ' I !* 4-g , - I p [ - - i
'l
..: - t -- r: r :
+- .- t i c -i . i-t - .- :_;- --n l
t:
+
I\ 2 . _ - . . - - j
%, t ._ r i , .;
, ' , . . 7 e' ~ . . ,L .z-.
g._w..__.... _.._a' -
- u. c & -
-{.--
~~~
.j,-- : _ i-i -- - -: d.- F u -- - g _ _ .. . : .;_. ; -r -
_- - p - - - :- _- N i - + _ # 21 Q T-~_ E_. Q ,.j g :ri ' .-{- E~.1 _{_~- ~{_2-{f i'~M p L- -
-4Q -h. g. ,
l
}_.____i___.
- 2 r L_.c _ _
i_
- _j: - -
---T-~--- '--- -+--
- ~ ^~ j ;~ '
.2 g_* ;~ - - - - ' _
._. m - t
[n-S . _. . . _ _ _4 . T -*-~.L__._-;____._.-__ '
~'f- - !
.___. . . ____m 22 ] -
_. _ g _ _ g.._.
- p. . _ _ -. y p.M --._-.-_j--__..__.__... _. _. _ . . - -
I k.
+
A i % 4 i 4 6 rag ; p_ i ' h N ]' IF . . ' ._ _ "! 7 *.\\ E*
. ? C! .
3, 3- . ; - . .; , . .
; pi l
- --- --- t +: - L+ m
___ -4Q R -- - - - -
--H =- -------t- ; i 4,,,_ T~~ ~ k :. . . . .
I L;h - ! s : 3__._ ' .kt, b i ~
"'- ~ " I I - ~~ ~ "'
j
. c4 j _ :_ ; _ u _ ; .- . I g .. 11. nny : 3 3+1 _ . . .
.5_ ,
y_
- ~~, : L - -d 8-+ - mM. .. =_ - - =_
= = = '
=~
=
L - l
,_. . 7 _ -. _ . .
b - - " *, ~ , - , _~_. h _ . ._ __.a - _ _ ... _ _ _ _ _ _ . _.
.___._...97 ._ _
4_ _. _- . - :1 __. ____i
^_.~ ; 1__ _ ___ _ J_ _ J -_Z.~. ~--~_i____. -!-,.-~- d j, _ _ . _ _ . _ - . _ _ . , . _ . ~' _" ~_ .'!_.~.Z {
_ _~.} ~ ~. ,. . . ._4_ _..- i 1 - Z:1 _ _; 1_-.__.. . _ _ . ' 4 pJ _._.._ 4 c___ . 9 - 4 ____ , %
' ._ [ t i a l 1 i i
~
! - - ~ ---
- I 6.-- -- - -
1
- _ 3g . _-- _.. _; , ,
' I
--_-4 I i
4.__i *
+ ! '
4 3,_ f. 4 -f -j - -- j -- r:'? : r-j ._
- +
---32q_-_ - : -- --_. -! -
l_ - '19Ti .-_- _
.-Ql .- n c. . :- ' ; i _" - -
- i9i i 2 -- j Yi--[ _ ; i_^
. :. h - Q =l ~- _. -' j i:jj f ~~2 ;~_ } =_^ }.ff- _-i_-j j si: L _
-',--~~--f_ .,
_. _t . _ . . _ . __}.__..__4__~.~___ _ ._._ _ __?_1 ._._ .._ _ ,~ - ~ l ' _._ _- j
~
. . _ _.__ q, . . _ _ . _-_ _ . __. _ _ _ _ . .. _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ - _ .
.,n g' I ' i i i -! i 15 g i l i i i i i 3%
- 1. _ .
J 6 I- I ~ ~ I '~ -
.",It g .
4 - 4 I I __. w - '{ -
; j !
- . . t . _
i __u. .- 3
]'--- + - -j . . ? -+- - -
j h g ._ - - -- 4...= : _. ! __ __
.- t . l
-_.-q_-._ ._--:--
' i In _- ' : T - ___'. .~lZE [ [ .;
. .r.-.*_ .. ..
.f__ _-f 13 ; -
C I__ .~
._l ._i := - : : :-- -. - - c : : _ _ _. : _::
._ _. _ ._. _.__. 2_ , 2 : _. '._ _.__ _.___..,
4-_-_-_..-_---.- + . _ _ . _ _ _ . ..__,_ _____4___ .
. _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ - --.. s. _ _ . - - _ - - - - - _ _ - _-___.--4 __ .
,p s
i i I l i iN-I -N i i is
, . .s . g
' ' g
! i -
\ 3 I -
j, , -- . g -- - i . .l
,.( -n . --
y - i . . _ . ._. . - _ . _ __ . ;
. g .k - . -
i i p
-{-:-i_a : = 1 -- =a. :=. -
.5+
3 p:d= i=iE-p -+ =5=E g:si.: 77 7 - + -- = i=- -+ =p -i--- g ' ~ ~ ~
- f.i. .___. ; ': . t ::; - ._. ..;_.__ 1: _ __ . . __:._;.r c ___.
___..,_..__n__..__.
. - - _ e- _
6 _ . . - .
.____.._,L_-.____.
4_-__.. _.
K N, n-(T) J .
* * *) ; E L 7ait {T I i i 4
. i ; ,
s l . !..__ \ ( i .
!l,,' !l' l , ;' ,,
ii
'ooaco
- ~ ~~ ' ' _.
. __ . . s
;. 2 :. : :-- _;--; (
, _4_ ; _ _ , __ ._ _ _ . _ . _ . . __ _
..-u- - - . . _ -
q I ll ~~i " I t 'ii I li l l ,
, j l l l l ii i in,; i i ;i !ii i:i : .i i i 1 0
u i,; i ll. , z I l F lll Illi l l l l,- l i I ll i l F 100 Coo " y _
' td i
Iti l i ; i , i i iiii i
, -c LT ii i p
r II i iI illl ,j j i , g ieii i ; I l l' I
,i i ,
l l l lll 3 6 I ! Q.
!!! '.ll ll l l 11 'l I. ,Y >- 2 l. i.lll i
I
. P. ' ,
i
,,i l I
O icooo ' V , i I i . . L.
^
. 6 ,
t 7 U I ' .I ' ' i l,i e i i
+*i G i i 1e , jl
[ l ' I_ !
*' i il 'II i i i N t ii i, i, , ii g 1
! ! ! i
! l
!Il! N Illl 1 !I I l!i '
ll l 2 l!!' i !! lll! l0. ' II l ll l ll!! lll I k 4 to l o +:p lj i
- u. ,oi ! a 7 ,,,,
i ii l i ! ,, g. 2
- _ , 1 . 4 _ _
, , :g --
_ 1 I j1 k iii; i 'Ti 1,i6 ii,,
,3 i , ,i,. i!,[ ; ;;
li hj l l il i
'!i i3 . - i i ,
i 1 i
- i. ! li '
l l , I- i lI lil 4 i ; 1 , , j 4 ll.
)
!; I li !!i < -
it i;il t: > e
, 1oo
_; _ ~ ' O -- ____ Z - T 2 0 a i,; ,j -._ T _*'M-3- , lll j,i jji , 4_ LD
'_. 'i' ll 'lll U i,!
!iil ll :l r E .,,ii ; ; ii iii ti bl
- _ . _ _p _ . 1 Ill l l l ;
d' Id _ _liil Illi Il llIl Illi l $ 7
~
I i ; iii j i ii l l I, l l:' 'C i lll l li [
--O 4 1
--- = , .
i 1 41 4 i M **T' ~~~ i , -- t .I ' i i ..i , m, T 7-* , i g, l I! ! i!' li i ! _z I! L , I .i ,it i : til I! ;i ll l ih_ Il ! II. Il! I! _ li l' j il l f,' A.
,I , ,I-g l1 ,I i ,
' t' ll l l l,1. ll' '
ti O O O o o o o i d M N b -
% v
.J 1um t s Js1-i 3 Ia 3 i 1
" " 1
!I l 2 1 340 -
3 f INDICATES CYCLING 320 - y OF VALVE ACTUATOR
' The DBE environment for 280 -
qualification is that obtained by subtracting margin from N the test profile.
- m. v o
N- 4 5 - [ z D 250 g ww~ core m eo ow. RE/Vf AupNrFME/1NA I o Gi . m e # l'A C- ?? l n g l
~ H 200 '-
1 - Differential pressure - 70 PSI l 2 ditto - 70 " l 3 ditto - 40 " l 4 ditto - 25 " 5 ditto .10 " L l'40 - l N ii i i i i i 11 i 4 14 1 30 l h SEC 10 3 HR 5 HR 8 HR HR DAYS DAYS DAYS , 5 HR-10 SEC _
, Fig 1 ' Test Chamber Temperature Profile for Accident Environment Si=ulation (Taken from IEEE Standard 382-1972)
1
'1 1 2 340 -
1 I 3 INDICATES CYCLING 320 9 0F VALVE ACTUATOR i ' l l 280 REMMstcpFRW NAWD o" E t0 99t.. /it P Q P M W g A d N f58 f/-25-/7 e
~
h250 - -
~I .
- 2. a -
%H '
200 --
- 1 - Differential pressure - 63 PSI 2 ditto - 63 PSI 3 -
ditto . - 33 PSI 4 ditto - 18 PSI 5 ditto - 3 PSI i 140 - i I it 10' 3 i 5 8 11 f I 4 14 30
)
SEC HR HR HR HR DAYS DAYS - DAYS 5 HR-10 SEC TI?E - h ' Fig 1 Test Chceber Tc=cerature Profile for Accident Environment Simulation i (Taicen f'ron IEEE Standard 382-1972) fROFNe' } ;
[
. f)ii e o :e oAgxga z i
}?> - Ef ei5
.F ,
h R b D $ g A i 3 $ E d S i L C O IF O R Y q p k P e g D r u A y E L 3^V Z A Y A T t a N - ILR r e d AP RS N E . p m C efj E M e NET I R N O T r M f MA R g b e / ID 4 EW D I V N h m a RW F E T S j y C t s e DM rE E T T c t H D g d e yJ T4 2
"- E r p a
R u s IU a e o L QE M k R y 2 O Q 3 E 5 M e IT r ug i F m* H II S I 9 n* I { H I Y O A
~ R P H S
-* BM L iT5 5 AE CRU i h1 S 0
I MS e e 1 lH 5 EO i hS HP G CXE R H 4 i H3 2 e I M e 1 I 0 5 e 1
~ - _
* = . - ,
" 0 5
* + 0 0
3 0 2 +0 05 0 0 2 0 4
'g
' G 3 0 8 62 2
1 _ 2 2
" 3
[ 8f.3W0 li!ll l ( \
,es uo oos ~ ~ ~ M
~
0 8 e o { 180 - Figure 5.3.3 PRESSURE PROFil.ES [ N iy 53 /
' li
/ N
'E
\
/ O
'5 100 ~~
/
I l} @ MEASURED TEST CHAMBER PRESSURE P I I
/ i .
l
/ I I} _
l ! ! g 80 -- I }r #:l-
/ 1
@*' y; m
s l ./f lI I l l
\
,i P!"m" M' m 60 _
I Ii IPA 969 4..
/ I I j .
/ l
'~
/ l4Hj !
i
/ ' S 40--- l d s \ I
/ I
/ l , 4D
/ 6- -@ ~~-0 20~ / 11 l \l jj
/
11 f f f im i i 5 6 y I lod (t-seconds) G ,
?MFMF y ,
k RIst 70 300 *F IJITU/?/ 60SEC. AWD 70 34G Y WITHIN SN/M. 3 START SPRAY DURIMG /MIT/dl RISE, MAINTAIN CONT /HUOUSL.Y. . . --
- -. - . t
*c (7 e t L i c i fr^
346 - 13 -si/cMEopses" . e . 4 O o e
* ;- 320*F/7SPS/G 320 -
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . L OPEN-CLoSE . . . . . . -
. CYCLE 300 280 -" <>
\0
\ i w
t
^ -2So*f//SPs/G s
'$ 250 - 'y I
T .
- q. . . . .
2OO*F//0 PS/G t
'N
> f tG 200 --
b-i 1 l l ia l '} jyg 1 I I A i 'f 1i i i' I V + ts 30 . so 3 5 e II psys psys ogg ucc gg igg , gg ug 5 ffR
$* SN*
- T/ffE i F/G. 9.2 ENV//?CHHEWTAL QUAlifiCAT/DN 84liAMETERS FO/? LOSS-Of*CCOL/
,1 RerRoPWED p N T M 7Ef 7 P r/90er p p. {A*N/f Ay
' AGr 2ictakg p,g
l ' )lll l l
% s. _
A a o M . ] v. _ r l F o _ u i * .o s _ t f o . Rt r _ a o 0 n I r r 2 oe 1" e p P - ti 3 b a l' m r N. oA e d I Te e M 1 V .o l i \ C li f % F af i A * ,' uo c 2 = t r cF e p M f i A S F 5 6 y
- 2
- st p
H l - M
- r X
A F L t. e p
- g
.i! I M 5 1 F 4
- 2 n * > _
5 - - 1 l 3 - - E I . I Hl
- 1 F
M - S s O f Y R - A F z _ P * . iliili!!* R D o H T N 3 1
;4 k i 1
N 3
. 0 a.
E E I D I C [ t M G R o l C N + _ A I S
+ M Y R L X 8 5 4 A
. A A 1 D 2 D H
_ U M
- o H 4 0 T F g
\
, C
- f Ie i o c E
2 A 5 i t R 7 l o o 7 + S ~ 2 ; J . _, 7 MCd d F M i g\ t s i g gt1 2 H 3 R H 1 R
?o
- k 1g
_ A J Fe 5 9 2
- 6 9
R OP
'c
[ .+ NI M S 3 cE o/t 88 l U D M 3 o pp# I # I _ l l g 0 Ec OM g 1 o8 S _ A p 2 + 1
- 2 f /r # 6 7
- ~ ~ - _ -- . - - - -
_ /LEMN I - 3 o 8 o 3 m s 2 m F I a l g eu u&eE g$@4 '
.' . I
[ k
fffMooreff fggjy
//M/74KpE ffMfer RENAT y 600ff fg Specified Accident Profile Temperature Take Insulation op readings and operate valve control I O 1f 1
P I f y y ]
' 1' 300 0 F 300 F i
D O psig I 70 psig i i I I I l g ,250 F ,, I - u l g g l jI , l l 30 psig i 200 0 F l l l 8 II l 8 10 psig i l g i ' l I 1 i I I ' i : 1 I l
; I i i i ,
i i
' l ' '
! ai I
, i I l I i
i I I i i I i I I l I 8 -
- ; i i i i
- I ' ' ' ' '
I i i
! l ! ! j ' '
l ! ' Time lo sec. 30 **= Mhn Mim 3M +7% 24 % 4
~{, +so.see. +10 set +2.0sec ,assec 4'8* Dq M* Ospf Sokk l .
I
)
4 Figure 5 j JC5eoFur yp J
9 tv d N E s b 2 L 2 v> 4) N ug% ,5 o-____________ _O b N E 2
- O -
4 $ T w c_ m a y
]N [
a b 4 "W Z & ~ E
.O. Ue .
2 2 v W U> _- T d a m a N IJ h< I ~ u - v$ I 3 12 s y @ 6 N 6 --- 5 e
. m N -
S O _e_-
-1 [r N "1 t A$ -
A h
- E R a M---* Z ?
~I
^tn-i i lN y L>3 m -
v1 a. w m 2 N 'v . y - d"
'O % yg I d" W 6 6 O
D; 0 4 N N N2 O l
~ ~ . .
F-C3441
$c or l
TW
+ N o
k w e dw < D
*W
- v. < .
. t; 2
8m :: w* - tO 5e fg s r5 7-w*3 2: 3 Ra s=- s EI 2 E5, 3
>* f , -il o -=- C2 <> o
=
?.#
== ::: _s c
! j$ N ~
2 i =
- E
- ~ =
- m 2 -
o r 9 '% . w a w Q
=': p
; .5
? ." ~ 5 o-l 2= -
e s- maa y w s.s e -
- .ti e s
3u
- :- :o g-2 <
i TI N %l
=
m A c, " ; _ . E (M s - E-Ej I a 4% % i 1-2 i
- ss j
h u
% .E
==- - -
t 2.s
.34
\% 2 8 a2 *%.
, er S(
N L 2
's-t a
k: o J
- _f" e,
- u
- m N e ! I I o; O
I O Ew O O O O O "r > O a a O, n u.) anivuunn 3-5 l hE mANKUN INSTTTUTE RESEARCH LABORATORIES l l l - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
= -4 5 90 8 FIGURE 3 l5 b g 80 ' SCHEDULE OF TEST ENVIR0ft1ENTS E " Saturated Steam Pressure Cycle 70 and Limitorque Operation Cycle y 60 <
M k 0 50 E s 4 = ONE VALVE OPERATOR CYCLE y -; E 40 - A A 8 $ B g 30
=
y q BOR CID 20 - A 4L_. A 4 10 < 24 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 23 1 ftf4ppKCD fAby OAl TIME-HOURS 8- CMM - #/ TIME-DAYS
j
.f 9 .. . 1 '
@ . .- ._p a
.p @ ., p
'9 8 . -. . ,. ..
I .. . M_.i . .
.,.9 ....o.. .. _ . ..
~ m. . -
1 ! . . ..
.n. , : ;. . :.
. 24 . . .
. 4 ~., . n S .
?:. 4L.&
. . . l.b J*
w ' ._ .
...l...
,a .
- 4 s.c . . - .
. . T-.. . .., .- .. ..
; 4
. _-.. . J.!.* . . . ; . .:. .. - .. .. b. - 1.. . .
O.. ji..
. . .y
_i.- .. -..L -' g
?
1{.; .-
,3.
q
- 1. .. .. .. ..
l
. . _ . .w.
4.. . . .. a , .i . . s . ..s I - . ' N, * .. .. . - . cw
- 3. '
t p? . JL f. * .
- 4. . . l . . . i . .gg,.
g .J
. Ia. .g. . I g) .
a
, .. * ..r. """."""'"*!"-*'
', s - .
r I.
- i. . . W l'* ~
.. ,'. e....i . i
' ' . an ** .
..6
,i .
.i M. 3g .
...4,....i f
y .. .. j
- l. ,....,, .
. 6, . .,
< b
,g 9.
a.
. . . . .p g
...4 .
- F.-... y
.. a T._ . .-.
_ t~
..j...
- j. 6
.L -
..g-+ . . .
. 4 ;. : ..._. .
4- - - -
;.4
_-..t _ t.. _ . 9--_ _- : _ l ,: . .
--2. ,
g
, , ...,g*g. . . . _ *
.s. .
_l 4 ., y,-4 . , . , qu ,,.4 .s . . , .e,.. i
...n..,.
_ ,- *ss O . l a. . ,y.. e 6 ., ,. . . . . .
.r,,. . . . .
. . . .g g e .a.... ,
^:
6 g
. . . . . ....*,.... .. .s} ~
. - .9 .,. . ,
;a .....l *.
.t* gi I [.,.,.. , .
g 4.p ,g .ag .& z. g_,___ t : - ! 9
.I! *'
- 4. . . . 7.y . . ..
.f.., ..
l t, p 4sydi.
. . ~ .
I
!1* . .
. . . . . 4 = i. . l .&... ..
I :
... : g4
. g. J. g .
s .e I. . ..
; t. ;. ; ! ,'
7, . 1 ...- .. .
...I-
. ... T*. ...,
.I I. . I
.p . .. . . ,
9... ,
.i . I. . - ..
i . ... w- _ e . . i y-
.g,, . . .. > .7 1 .
.- s
- l. . . < .C2
$. 7,. ,.r .- 24.
eg. .,
~
..I...r .. -
1 .- Q -- , 5- a ,4 .. . ,
---_p..... ---
..ug . .
..a. ,... 7 , ,
- 4. . . , ,.
i l"2 _. . . s., .- 6J .
.-,[....
.g. - - -4 6---. ,
s . (J c.-. _.. _.
. ,4 , . . , - :.... . . .
.- % _ . .. Mn. _.c; 3
,a ,'
, i
. . l..
. a ;
. .e.. . : -
L .' g '... . _ .. . . m -. . o.sn O.... 4 _p.. w_ e . .;..- : , . N
. . ~
M m - . . _ - _to - g' - :
.IM ,O. .
- L. r8 i
(.. i D
. . . . . . . ._......- o. f
*t e= =as -
I n ... n. . . . .... ..' .'*- ,
- .i ; .
. uo
.- ' N t *
...I . . . ..
*%a o ..T. l \
g g _. e 1 a . _.. e l
. u ru
. . . . fv)
I
.v . .m._
a . . . . .. , .. I Y . *.g, f. 4 .. .
..p.,,J.~.,....
_... s .... ... . . . _ . . l, .._ .. . .(,Q....' {. S.,
- g. ,,: . s S- . . . . . . . . . . .:~ i
' ...4.
_ e.- . , . . . .
.. . .. f* ..
- _- . . . 2.. ~ .,.. . . . _. . . . . .
R :. , e ..
, . . . . . , ~ . . ,
......L..., .
e
........t_
.- . 1 i ...i,. .
8 e*.; .. . . . .
- t. .-
_.....t-._ I
. . ... l.-.
..-..g..
.-~
Os .e... .
\...
.e...;. - -j. .t .!
j .
.s
......n3...~...._...
..j.
. . . g. .t .. .. .. . . .
f e t
.e ..
My I 8'.~- ..
- y. .
..4.~.. ... ..
==
~ .. . . 1 J. .. h . . .- . -
.j t
, . . .o . ,
- y. ,e S. . .
i 9
- m. .e
- 8. ._.
+
n .. ... -.. . g . N
,4... .,. ... .
i t
. . . .. . .. .n
.;l,
-~T.. .l . .. . f". . .y .
t 4 . . . _~. _ 8 -i .
... . s - :
4 .,"".n.. , , 4 .( .Q g e. . m g
.r***-
., . rTT':-
,. .. i 6 -
*I----**-***'-*-*-*g ** . . .
4 t..., .... A
*I,l .
.l..~...- N y
It*i 3.
, 1, .
' I' ; i 1 . I. '
.1.,..
. 1.
...g...
. . 6.
. ,9 . .
---*'..e-
.g4-O 3 1
. ,a. l i.
e : :
..4
...t
.i.:.
i 34 . 44 s.
.. . ..~
. ,s .
l .. 1.. .
,L
. M, 1 e
W+ W: 4 +a .t-3 ,.tl
. .H. +. s. a:i. ~:j- ". r. a k. -
7
';-- . - r. a . * ---
- l. .,! l. . ...
. ., . . ..*T'....
. . 1.
~.r. - - - .
.g.
g .t ..
. .s . 1.. . . ... .
.. .. 1 . ... -.
. g .
..... ..g ..... . t .et.a -' van -
. ,I
.. . . ..u.., s . ..
i ;
- l' .
- ,mq . '
1 ,.,. .- y-E E 8
~ S E m
I_ h ik..,.- 1
,,..,,,,.x.g K ^ ' ' " '
M,,,,- "" - g
e a o ..* a
. - g e
. f. I. %
. f .- , .
. ~ =
4 ... .. d ._ _ ' . . .___. . . . . . . . . . .% . -- k h [. 8
.... ... s .. ..
,. .t ... . . . . . . . . . . _ - -
i 1 # d 'l i j
... ... .... _ .._. .+ ... _..-g...'...c...._-1.__.__. . .m (
l t \_ t
. .... . . . _ . . .s. { .,.
4... .
. .N+ . . - ,
t-
#\Q
! 4 -
' ~ '
- t . ..)7..yf _ ._ . . (g, .
,_. . .. .- - ._...._3
; .. l . . 1
.'- I
.. .._ . ; _ _ t i _ _ . _ . _ 1._...'.' .d.... w ..<>.. '
g e ' ' i j
._....1......-_
w
.n. . . .< ..s..,..._. Q ! .
i
! ?" i i, s :t: 0 t '
8 s .i A I l t %.
. . . . . . . . . . l. . g. .er%
-Q.. 4_..., .. __ .. .. e
^_ . 4
- l
,, o. .s() :s
.2 .s s
.\., , . ,
3, .;. w; p, p- --
- w- - - -
(q O ~; . y)@ '- r.s.,. ,.. . . _ . _ . . _t . , .. . . .
._ l
_..__.....C' . . _ . . - i . 4..:.s s
. .. ... , ' - .N i i
- ) . ..
I
- . .. < l' .
..D, _./) . () ..
- Q. . r'.' *y ' . g _4 . _ . . '
......., . . . . ..- . _ _ . . . . .N s
I 6 h
. .,_. h/.' _.. . . .
- . i.-- 9
..!_(.
... _%. a.
!_-_. f.......-... -.%.
s . .. . . t 3 -.
-_..._.!. . .. . \.* * . r.. . . .___%...
.r.g . : ,
I g 5 -
' 1 I
,. e .% f. . 6 e
, . 6
'_%....._...* _ 1.- . l. . . L '
b * . g .
..._...;.......t.. - - _ . - _ _ . . ..'_.._j.._._..
- c. .,
... . ,. s
'I '
I '
*5 M [s. , _ . . . . . . . . _
.s. 1. .. .
g y .
. , ,r*
.g). 3,..'_...
_-..L N.. .*
.) . . . . ..
N __.'. . ..C. . Nr. ._. . ._ . . . ..:. . --
. ! m u .
a i I ' s . u
.. , N
,. _ . G
) , ,
... . g. . ,
.~ , , . . .
_...L... .)
, }..- _. . _. . .
[ .]g .._, . _ . I l ,M...._
.Mj l ! '
V[ . . ' .. . . . l'4., . ('" I \ I _...s*........ J l '...I.. ._ :* e
.. ?._.'._
.l I
;w 6
'N e
7
. . _ _ -.% .'*).....
.~
. _ 1,.
..(N). . J .
j l " M' - l
....4._.. N
~ s I
I'.-_-.._ _...f.. .
..--..sq.7
. . . t I
. - _ _ .., - _ .-._._e a.
3 _ _ . _ _. . . . . _ . . . i
! .. . . .lLi S- .)
.. j . _.. ,
l 1 i
..+ ! .._. . . . . _ . . . , . . . .!
, % s .g '
. . , l'
.O,,a
. . _ _ ' . _ . ._' . .. . k
, . . _. . . _. . r .. . .., !
{
; k~
o
* * ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' '
,I .
i
!. : i
~' ' ' ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~
-...~T.***'~~%'~~*~~~~'
~ 't , ~ ~~t ~~~'-~~~~~""'~~~~:
. ey
. L ,.
s .. -....
.n lg'/
.._....4._._.i .
g i
\ _8 ._.'..... . . . _ . . - .
'i ..!'......_... .. ...!
e * ' l l g ( . l-[, [i y o . .. g
.' . ..- _yp) .,,, p.
.,.y..._.._. ...l .'............
.._...-......._...-.p...%.
c.4; i .. , . , a. , 7 . . . - g .... .
.....q..._... . . _ . . . . . ..
, . . . . . ._ . . . _. j .. .3 1
d .! t
. g- ,
J
.4 _ __
r . _ . . _l \
'e' .
gg
.f f.
f I S. .E A .,
= 1 .
i . i j I, )l F-C3635 [
,O. ,. tv,1 i- sWHlt$173 h ! M I %
AD s 8 3 h. f @8 !# #
\d
.! e I ., a '
> u 5 t -
9 j & i : a 4 k' p O 1 > a p~
- c. . 3 m
o
- y a .
.i
[' , swws: e ,v3 t a
.. = j
. o g l[1 .
. E g
# 1
?
r g2o=g4 2 i; Y
- E 8 E*e & m we~ s o *
= tEd
- a
* = .
Eg aoS 3: seus e ,v3 l> d*
~s 2*
o E =4 g"w
* - a 5wa2 l w-8 W s a h gm a 4 PE
.# 2 : $ SeWwa<e
, *5 p! # $
sWHW $173 I* u#U{g5 g gg 2 E*g 88 g
- e i
p n aN 3 l g- n 2 l 0 - y
" ~
3 ;-
*a g a 1
sWH 9'l 4D773l> . - . %u 1 o
+o m E ai .
i w g.aw . o $0NIQV3W 9 N0117861173 IS313Wd
*n -
k. I I I f g 6 S g R g a l R ~ ~ - - ( d.) 3Hnivv3dn21 3-5
.g L
, e k
I i
m
-C '
l 1 i o
* .o w -
M "
-o e-4 H -
LO W
~3 k ^
4 F g 55 4 to y 0 -
- A kN g,1 5 6 [
h Ed [ B z . %, C - 4
- =
o O l l l 1 o a l l i l i 8 o o o o o o (J.) SEIRLVIEdNLT, , i
I e no H ; i l i D H M Q. Q D l .t "OM m
.O e4 D
b H e R e ~
> 4 -
e w
- g m
m e$ E d 13 m sx E 5 e O' D A
- ~
Q .O H H n O O
.O e4
, e s 8 J O O a
O m g S m n (orsa) aanscasa
e 4 l g -S e 2 m T* n a $ m - m o m g e 5
- ie m ! > ~
M -O R< b 4 Ed
+
l I ts. C fC - N m {.
\, !,
I I i
+-
O O (do) 38blYEdNIb O N m e
l, lI Il, lllll l I l-5 i 0 1 4
, 0
.. 1 M 3 O 701 O
R V I S M T S ) 1 A 2 E C E E S L E f ( I F D E O T i D R P o T S _ V _ E _
,2 R 0 U 1 T
A R E P 4 D T r o 4 '0 2 1 3
-,t
- 0 0 0 0 0
0 3 2O NR8~be 2 1 I (1l l
ll1l ;lli! l 1 J 5 0 1
,'0 1
3
,0 1
6 4 2 1 2
. )
E l C L E E I E S ( F g M O I E R d T M P l I B . S T e V n 2 i E ,0 b R 1 r U u T T A R I P M E T e o s s 1
,0 1
0 5 5 2 1 1
- - - 1
- 0 n*. c. 8m6e 0 1
, \ ,l1
o s - o_ l _ 4 _
,0 1 _ _
3
,0 1
6 _ 3 4 2 5 ) E l C E E L S I . E ( F g IM O E R d T l M P B I S T e n V 2 i E ,0 br R U 1 u T T A E P 4 D T F 5 5 1
^
,0 1
5 0 2 5 1 1
- 1 0
m gw M 8m 0 1 i ,
, .t l l c ;
e MI 4 0 - 1 - 3
" 0 6 1 6
3 4 l 2 E - E . ) L g C . I - d E E - F l M S O B I ( . R T E P . - x . M _ u S I . A V T . _ E 2 R 0 _ U _ T 1 _ A R I P _ M I T F 1 6 2
^
0 1 0 0 0 5 5 0 1 2 2
- - - i 0
-aL mh 8mke.
0 1
, ,,,i
!l
MIMiniff07 X-604 Dage,_.16 .,
.l . . . .* : .
, . . .c _ 4 . Z ;.: 4. ,; ;;* : . . . ; .; : ?
. . .. :. ; t .. =. . ;; - . .. .3 - _ . . _ - --. . . . . .3:- - _ ; ,__
-+ - -
- l
- t. .' . :. -l
+
. .; : . . r :b.
- + t. :..l;..
. . .i.
... . 4-. [- u
...__.7.....
.] *
. - . ...-p.'.
i .. 5:~5 ki . : i_ ~.__?_ _ . .' N ; s
. . . , . , ._ [' .
. .' 6 . - a. If + i! ~! : Ci -
iF^* - i i M,
.-l. . c . : n:. ' . '
i U. ' l
. .;_in. .j ; i:.i - 4p ;;.i.~.hn_c . nj ,' T3h !
.i!.. '
~ .f. - yc . :._j 1..
.4.
i : H.~ri':
- 1. .
~2.3.
lii - 9EJ]: U:'
' . 2'lt " E- l j. .' . . I '
.J ...... : ! 44.1 j l
.!-- q. . _:.n .1;[ [.1.3E :. .__ : J.].E:- iiiiilE i p: ..l'. . l '.. '. d,; h a 1 'I ** h:305 I3 $; 15. ; b-f 355. .: !.5; .. b5h J. : : : . ,
h- ! r
.. . .t .:
t-;
'! $-Y iki~ "-ii." : - ii]:
'i5d E!-! :.}. . N;; . I- $2 .. ;
, p :. ., ----} :. ; . a;j: .
!.y 3;;h. .;; .. :
- i. . :- ---- - N1 . . : i
- _g .; .:. -
qg
, . , , , . [tq uy - .,[hc : '
- i[:. . 1. : j.;f J j :hj,Cf.
- _ , ,
'l
- jj ;j : ,
c,. g- . ..". .
-. r
..' g, - .d., . =..l q .c. . . c -
. f..
_ :. _:k. .:-. .c : p;;.
? ;-
.I "f.--i -j
.g- . ..l.
'j l im
.t.-].
C- - .
'I.
1
. . . p . . . . . ..11 1
.d . . . ;;2 :
.,..i:.
, 1 l
..---l-. .it ! mA
- ~ ~ ~
. .g ..
.!. ..l.: - h, J . .
.j._,f .. , . ,
. j :* : : T- . -C.__: - . J.:8 l
.m I'
. ;"U q . .
,.,,,2 ;
.....I_ _ . . . . ' -. .! _ _ .._. [- ! -l* h h! .. '-
U g
.1
.[!
[h, I
, g.
. . 'i . . _ .. . q
.l. ,l,
.t.
.. .1
.y .: . ;7:. s. uF .;: -. . . .. .
1 ., . . p 1:
! .l.. I
.g !,_p:
,,, j.g..
i
- J:z
- - 1:..:t:- p :-
4 l, r.
. :. . ~ -'
- 4. 4 _-
. . . . .: y.
p . t - I. .!- u.1 :_
. i: -
+
, i .-
;- .c I
i i.
..-;. -t!
l :t
- l. '
i
,. . -M -
' 1 ':
t ! : E. -l te
. . : j .. T va ;
j.. -
.ee !". $) . UJ l .
9
.)
M- I' }' t t .H g 4P.2
.._ .^~ . _J .
g
,j .
' ' l 8
-j c' :. .
i -
.! >g . > < .j 'J w o _
J. .
.l:
i .; ,
? !.
, 1 1
. ,j _ y 03dCw' W .. * ; .
. a
.E
.,; , t j , r . .I
.u .t j .: .- u. , I- t ;. *..
1u. I m..3 i " 4 j -9
;y . : .1.2 .
. .- -l ! U.
- l. l 'E . _ __;4 g a;
i
' s$_x...:. . . . . . ;. .
-.s i
s-. i [ ao ' !
' .l . I =
9 - m j j
.'. l' I :.
_j..
- '. { > ;- ,.i
*' ,. 1 y {_ .. . .
__.._['l_ . .E . .t1 .. .i.* !} c t - g_;__
;_ j.. j; 2 ** .: I lg ,..
.= m i, ,
1: . d *
! i g .. .. . .
' j.
.m _.s..
e t . . .a , . . ;. .. .i .., .- ,
< l
.1
.ar " . ...-
l ' = - ;e, h .. ,l, ~ n " .;.,
~
....:t._ . . .L...
~l , , l .,
~~ _ ! . [. . ,:* 'l [~ '----
~~
.g , ..~
t l ---4l C
. i I L
- - + -
- r r:2.: ., g -.' .
o
._u , . , .
-j j
, l- ,
i Jom w , _
'_ . :.. :.. 2 ci m { !
i
! ', 8
- o. . j . . .. _}_ _.1.. . j .
._q...
2.___q : ._. . . . l, o . , , ._.
. w __ .
._. 1 i .
.p _. t m -
- g .! l ,
- I' .
y . e, t:m e e i i I :
--i-. i. ' -
. .r...
I, , . . _ _' _ , . J. : ggw
; .i.
lm = l t 3.%. e t , . i i t ; I.e d.* -
' f. - {
5 '
'. ___ gl Q. .cu .
..; w '4 -u ;,,[ =. j i
!.i.! !
l ;
-t .{ ..;. . t. .. :.u..
o.-< : o, _ E.. *=, .l . t . m
. . _I . _,i
.__~.-..__.__4, .
o m o .c i o o o ' c i
. __ . o .._m...R.._.-. c _c J _. . Lt3 .. .: /. C _ :_;.!.
m n m m
... d' N
.; m-
- j. . .-
+
; j j
311fl1Yli3d!G1
l l { _ e 5 0 1 e 4 i0 1 3 e 0 1 M R N6 O' I4 6 T1 2 A R . ) E TL U L EE E I N .E S F E ( O PG M R D I E P LL T M A3 C . I T I S RX.V TU E CA , 2 0 E R 1 L U E T A R I P M E T r O 1 5 1
~
~
^ ,0 1
G 5 2 1-
- 1
_ 0 n 0- M28l 0 1 l lll l
- .-- -- mg h . , <si m. --- -- w -.-am ., .- --mm m +-,. .- - w-num m . w .- s --- ' - . .
' I i l i
' in r s i Ia .ru cr /-16 i
u .i c :vma.. F@ i_ _i
. M !si . g_ i=- iw m. u m.
__-p! Si <r z e'N ' E
-t 2ui 6
!R
!a k, 7
,_,__. 5 a
f, .
- dr'_ Tl a :
O I ici ic=j m ,, , mi m. . k I in n , I l 3., i i _i J sVl
!,f
~
-MdhMih'$1S l t i ie Ai Iy W M'a . : Cr <! a: c'3,fe r$ 1 I ! ml 1 I vi ] i- s
_,M1 11 I - (t Lp z I .w s-. -- 3' F r iLIH
- . si %
, c- -
wGr7 - a 1
,NT ~'
N ['A i j -5 f J djprE N i i d N i
-~~~
= ! !! ! .' h x< iE i'
i t
'xo A
!R ,.
g I L ' i (6 in:
'm, Y is t 2 5d
! =u; I I A r '
i Q - i I yA i 3 Ag
! W.
' ' ' ' W A i i c: Q I . .
1 I C A 4 D is. t h .i A QF LI7 l115icYES 'Zl A ~
---+$.g..P
~'
I ! 1 U7 i
-%hMm
! . .J Q
- i x -g' a#O 5s .
Y
! I !
d %F 3 P _M ! br* 4' P ' 14,1 i tri ,A i s w,;s, ua - i. W'W+g . ;- Q, % C
> %.J
~ h i . n- 1 F A - << l i
.m e,,
m e.s m, w m e 2 d' DO M._. ll1) 4as wh J - 3,1 r if {
!3 c
em pM '- mt- 9 C ! k- A r. N
*~ -%1**k' L
~]
. H.*
3-I I r4i _. p 4 q.+g y
.~e %g,_ -
I V -
.i_-
I
-- >< O -.
A I A Q 7' lE .C t ! ic: ; _-,g.p h -%+ f*% g - d im ". va . 1 h. i
' i
, (
m
. ___1
]
1-
-~ % f 1M y r
_L. Q_
--, M Q_{_L @on ; I ' g .G 1 l
LJ . !' k M C+~-- - ' CE k l d fpi -
\h W 3=, '
M. W' 1 W hl I N P
. ! c' .
f 7 . N--l M
*I-
! l !
t i w r [ i o l I ; i
.k E
+
[ La P g ,,
" = W lu. R 7 y,TN, /
C'n ef p [iI ,, mv se a k g '&. y, i
,,,, eT 2 .
./.- -.
d % 'I -~ ty D N ~ N K, ;y7 t- 1 r ! ig
--g-
.~
L i 1 i i i !
.~L.I' Ll I I I l 1
% CJ i a- 'ci , . i na rp, i d- i i
-tes
.r Ndhd
, 0 -fkMh-14dd. C, ,
I i i l iI I ! , i i ! l ! I i i ',4Ii
'. i i iiii i i f I I !_li f's ./ ri a! a i !; .rs I i ig i ms. u .a u u..
.l
?E 5' . . . _$
> Y Y! e e- e- y-4'r y ;%-
'H F1 i s 6 A A A n
.__4 e<r! 1 m~ a,. ia, a a -
--4l@~6 k * !
fl 7_ w 3 9 ;
@m 46itM 'E m J j
- _! ! i ! i
-4 4*e?? W! s$d N__ftp-1 ci . ' vi ,
u Lv ..N 1
-4 m = Fi +i tn-a _
r6, ., r- -- +a- -
,- - r m -- r --
o , i i9T*iTM V i N, 5" I
! !ge ! .rg s ,
- v. ,
__L'Ai ' :n- Lii y. , l a v.
! ! i i
! ! ! . I i i i i! l i%p A ~ g
!I I * ' hi! 1 1 iAv y=, ,
I ' I :El i ! > 1 A g;
._ L i
3 i i M i w o
! i 'b, E Dm ; 4 I
f 'O' M i
~
'?f i
I I k D 'I i
.f i
I! f ' i i hF II 4 l 6 i If i , w l
.ki,'j i -
4_. 4.. ' _N ! A ,
!I i ! Q i l - gi l I !
6 ri A. G' o i M P-- 6 i *e y v --4ta rMEF -Z1
. !LF 1 '46-W.h. , ii
.D ! !" U Mi i W w
,, e- -
w, iu 4 u y *I .g ! m w t I ),
*sm! - I a ! (F IMI d N f* ! d .A j d N H-!: pNi 'Ln m i'c '
e I4 I _ A i.
,A
& %d 'C'
/ 1 ' . i <
plig "- y n [ & i %s i c -- N qILlsaj @! : 2 w to, A .. , l~ C_ W Ii t- W. . u. q E k -h . f "d
. b *'
h til 1 Q' I M V y %* , cd gg p y y, FCOT e t; 7-4
- .WV e* A p, a
'i M Fe_wf .
v -
.Lr
>< .ch .n . N El "'
.-4 E .Q l ! ! IC:
- , 5- M- i i
- Q . R( , - . -g__--- - -
o c -
- o. i 2 i x
" L I; !
~
_ R w. i E"4 i ! - l i i
. P-i, m
*h ,^
i-M~ l o tat3{; l 'Tl l p [. g
]
i
)
M re l ! . l .J c+ 9i L T i i I 1 2 M 3 dI /C I M (
- d 1i i
_j M l i l j..L I ;j ' L l b i ' I g
}f Ll3 f l w.s =n
!nal ' },
} . .
Y T.n d"' ( O WF M8
.M 3 i
! I .', ,.
l l d_ m w"' #
.ssi f y
. ma
~
=*3 i LI) i 4W
-~.-- -
I i I MQ M ..--. ' I a h ! ] i* I i l i 1 ' f
,L,,( I l l } l l I I w w rai i e- :ci .-- w i d' i l b 'h-c(- u -M Mb -1hd;[ h l I a i ! .
~~
.. J_ ._
I
.ag u u. ~ ' U. aa. ' at ELim <i o io o ei 4
.L L ' 53 9 sp GP l ANN. ?s'
. .. . M ;,' :::: M
J
,JJ,_h3122 2.. 2 J'C' ' '
'.2 l! H - .F+ :D 23 i l! I l' a 'l !! j En x (O. OiLF 3#%m. ' s 7 -
g5 4 $ [_.E+ EI'- ~ f S h[ A'* V I F "" _mwag,_-,gr % R w .g L. ._.2nt sh!s- :L.-<-<==<= %q w-;.y-g-- j d' y- ;w . ,, . -
.- 7.. - yygg-g F <
Jw . I
--f M Lt -- - *~ llC* I
~d i,.. M ! i k'-7ME~ l I g e 2:
'J
_=L N 615._A% e h -4 ,,, m, h( Q T~f- -~X G ' 2- I
" a I
-ot #4 ." M kd' ~~
] f Y c') n i WT~ , 1 x ,
,)
M i i 1
'l i fI I 1' N l T.
lyR.9 -X-G _I m iJ s J h I
-~W I '-
'. ,e r*-~.f ! . e 6 ,
, , _ % l1 m I!
n Y
~~Yrh h-h Y '?
~~
. m b I! J g __ A.h M '9 F (Ji # <
Q N [ -
.e ,
n'- a R g"& lr Q
... ll
. t yG?
. . n
}, ._
$ 'a Y l
- 6-'_$
~
=
at. Ln o r- 3 g c- , 4 j ~TYNWT'? 3 'i liph i' . n 1 l l Laf
.D- _(SC p I lt;@ ! N I __J _ M 3; . .J . < -'- " - i cy i pt-I C i- A m j
d 4k g h ;6; , g7 7% [%$ 5 % ,l
~ ~~~~
A il i \ ' gJ G If f Y w W L i
~.
__ n m m % e G
.a
=,
'_Gw T>' &, q~ + i 1 y 7' J I'4 EM r 4 m c I I
I 7 0st i 1 J f P3 3J 9- 8 N I I I r : 1 1 E 2 l 1 1 U 1 I j ,; qD il _ Ji I I al _
' _' i
_J 9 i. W i -
'{ 5 l}
L_I I sd il A j' W
/ . -
-]
LJ c l l. y in _y w _-.
. f. .' ',
__,J ( !- J / .j l' T G
-j 7! r "
!: 2 /
?_ _x' AV '
jur d ' i,m _' u # I . _# ,
.w? mkI a Yh-
-Ef p # I's m ~
.# . :l1
'_ 1"" i II JJ Q. _.J= l1 1 il . ,1 /
J;2' . 5
~
l !i J kI A
'I AJL4J i .
_1. pr: 7 z;ca ! i r i
. .i . 7 ii iI!
- w - I l l i i i i l i l! I 1 i i.l i 8P ';"; - -
!u i ik !
"} "{ . - , u,
.id Amm
>y i4__>w.. '
mwcrru l I I I I mm l i i i! 7 l ! I i ! ! I i ' ' .w i I . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3 ij k I k. .. _ $ i
! i LJl h l' 6 _" r; 1i.ll I i e i ! 'vJL3 r i l
I _La. .w w _u. w
!!.! E. 'M E 'J'
. L I II!! 2: 04 X X "
i i
!iii ' r-i A ru _L L_g-. - i l i i!II t l l ! T 1 ! l :CP !
T i 3 I I i i I ! i* ' ' i i m i
' iit iii ii i i i t i i 3: i W
I! , 1_ i i 1I I i I i I = I ( I i il l f- ,__ ,,
-sa d --
fc , l i
'I i m i L u i- ' i i
, ! ! I i Yt I i i ! '1 ! Il ' '
! l .' I r
i i i i
! il '_ i
, is ii i
! ;M! i i ! i 13 i I Ii . i i
! i i ! ; ! 1 ! ,u i n ! i il I ! .
!Ii i e1 I i l i is1 P i ii. i i t i .
Q-N,!I . sf- n
. 4 i 1JL.
, CD i it i , , itT j j ! ji'F;t s_ -7 1 A, _ $ _ .L ! i i t --
i i ; i j e- # v- i, ; -
,e w - v i i ii i ' +
" . -Q &: ' g 1; a f l 7 N
!q!
i i a- 1 I la i i
.! [ .Il fL p.g i i~t I. ! }l__._,) '
.5 ff 1 I II ' !
! !6. !. * :' ' - !!Ii '-~M l'
!i
- 03"MiIi .,+m
- C LJ w a
kJ w i w u. i oJ!! !
; t l' 1 y
'P= iMi M i 3
! ! i 3 1 f
, , 4
. ^ : M,S-%.. . L i- ,
Ay*g .
;: -; i ^ i i
M,,' ! fI ,r#
- I C s,tt Mem !,-
4 i- _._.._. P I l ;l {
! I
- mp.um ._g'iL.L ' e-! ! ! ! ' '
j i! i , a Awr:iw. W MW sn.25_- ! ! b i l'l 4-++4#6 7 -. ww+-+-
.i
-o
%m- .
u w p g u a.s ' < (s e %-etw L _.O tg g ..4 -! 't e5d {*
. _._. 2. LO _ D t.LE.3a.1 A. _ . . _.Sa r!--.L f
- vM w t' M' e .
ww x Lg_ ,j - I T ?
- El'F -' J M ,- _ ~ O'" lae ~ } D. a; v ,.H 1 .l; t- i i
-m , "_3
, m , - - - - ~ -, , u ,
i 9 @ . . . - k- ' '- A .to w - sc.- . MM.'.g r a n I . s I N./ 'h mna.7. _N E- -7' . i ! I i i ! i! ' i
!a 'L.
' .# i
( t '
> m . . ,- ;, ,f' _ o .
44.-+-;25 he. - i d :I I i - ,+- 7_.g.o - -
- sl 2
!!i
! I i
a__ 6
! i Il L
I
/
i'm 1 W ._ &_ hi
! . I
( r,. ct i i i i i i i i J' :
>i i
I 'r i 41.g , i .1]
- t. j l l i i
!!O i:p r
g
- .g,yy Ca: (1 n .i a -
. i i 11 1 i! i '
Ii i ! t i 1 f I _14 f I I f I
-t !
er LM! t I
! : i ! ! I I E. t-._ C4. e. .1 co i a i 1 i i ! !
t-d
'_ 1_
A T66 77 L4J [ j,
,,;;--h
-' I
- .a i *'**
4,d mwb b um ~; ci J w
.- r-ca z ce !t . %*, , ,
1 ' l [ .~1.g t-t g+.: g AA . 4 f II 1 w !
-Hube -ei l ' s .. i i lii M.l g
hw 'oi ! 3 ,.,Gl l ; - _alf ! ! l l ... l. 5
- il i l' L4 4 i
. i,!i d;i '
i t *C I ;! ! -6Lt!!!' '
---W !I',
i i ii i 1 ui-Tii! ! k;+i - E t A TT Ii i i
~10 i u gi, i 1 1. i i ir ,
p i' ' I
!' i ! s- i i ! ! ! ' 2+ 1 il 'l I ' I i e i i! i ! i LO . il . ---- i/ !
! ! } l '._ I !.
'u i i P - -
i M ~ it ! I I 'L _..
~~"*
i l i o l I m r
, i , . i -i 1,. ii :
! i C w. . i . i i ) -
i! I _ #T: CJ l i l
~
l i &ll"" ~ in F#*M!!' I # fj ll W i i i I 'i i il /' r _ _ Li . _ 4 j lj L=si=='*""'~! ___ l. : , y 3J l
~
g . I1 i I !i ! l . Q I5 7 . ' i ! ! il _ . I : . hEr
-e c
- f Mh--h! j !
j l 43 I , y_- _._.-- __.-- {f lI l l I j gg __._p
-. w; ,9 e,--___,%_ _3__- i 7 li ,i ,i i i , i
'r,*j i M
*+
ii 1 ii
'iW iiI
-. ' , +. l 1 , -iii i.
y i i ii 2 . i kb ~'1 d !, i j i ij ii 1 4 i i iiiiiii j,! ! iii Trq i! ' it?~.ii i i 7r *1 ;
- <! T' 4
-.'- e *- m -e- _ .-- = . e -.> - .- - ..-._ -... e .e -- .-u .. -i._.>.
*' *'" - - *- M'_..*
_,,,,, , ,,. .. ..._.i* e..mup==pe.e.-iie i_,_ -.e-I.. -. g--s eu .* e'. - '. - -'- *4 e.ieii-w H sm __ __ ._.. .__ _ .._ e p_g- q 7r .p x . .._ _ . . - - . _. -. ,p g _ _, . 9 _ - _ _ _ _ p.____.___._ .. __ _. _. g __. _ . ___ p . -_
. p. _.
p_-..-_g__ __ - -
. - .._q -{ . .
T
^
_._.p_ . __y_ _ y __ ._.. 1 n ..-i r- -e -
- <l $f-Tb I u , U f
- 7. I 22 ..__.______.. __..._.. ..____ .___ _. . .. _ ..____._._. _._ - . _. ._ _._ _.--.- _ --- _ .-_
._- 2$$2E
__.- r. ._.-
. _ .__._j ___ ____.____ . .__ _ ___._ . .. ____..__
. 7
-}._.- 7 . ____
T
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
~{ll-~lli._
~~"" ~
__. TZl l? Elli __ ___ -_____. _ _x_ __y x g<_._g4_p,__. p___v.__ ,
+;_
%g._....___ .
l
._7
_j _y_ . -_.. .-_. - __.. s, ._ .
.m.- y ._ - .-.--. --__ _ \
7
..__/ _h <
}
__-. _ . - _ . . -.. -- -. _7_y.. g
, --.. y
_ 7 y. _____ _
, 4 _
+. ,, ,_ _
iPhf.l%'-i3I. g._---- ,--q-r L ___ __.___ . _ .___..__4 [ _.. _ .. - ..____} _,__._.__..y I
-F__.' ]
y e y_ .f ; _7_- h38h_- , I j'y
-4
{
/ _--
_-\- _ / -__.,__ . __
- p. 7_-.g y
.g _-3
.__g- __
7.,._ _.__-- l -
- z. y pe_7. ,
y , __
! L___, j._ iTh +_ _
il _71-1 r4 4j !! ,( m__. _ma_ q 77 .-7 f. 1 i 4__a >-H !L 3 ..F L H -H. . +,
. . ._r_H r,p_
7_._ _4, '+y n. _ H3a ,H.-H
-___.____.n y_._. -t- - _+y_q.-i ,F 7t- = ._
g-y , _7 .
.' _.d__ 3- t- ,-t 3_4_-
---tT _
_.-~.p_Y-- . j_-_ + . . I M _..".4_ j ~ - ";-'-- 7
. 3, q _-
l 7jg_._ ,
.--t_-
M-F'-'
'-~
_ 3 _7 -. .y _- y ., , _7, _*y*C , _ , . - . n
-y 7.
._._ 7_ 7_ _._
..,__p g ._., ..pw_7 _
. g.
.._p_ ,. _p _p_
___ _ _ ____ __ _ . .__ . . t 4 _ .p _, p, _ ,7 , _,_, Q_ _Q. _. 7 rw
.__._.hM__ _p q
_.l . p+_L{_t.l_ M.tY- __.._____._;. j
! j .
7
- ~
a
.+__
.py_--_-t .
i
, p r,-- 7_ ___,_-.._- -__. __ .
-... u_ _ ___ _ __ _ _
n .._ .._p+ . ____. _ _
.y_. _
_ T_ __J
-_ . _.- . - . l. ._ _
. 7. ._.
_ r , }_ ; ,
.{ . .
_a.._ m, ,
,}.
_. -H, , --- _,p-- .p+. p. _rt_- .7 r _,_j ~_ _ py. _H; -q__-r_p . .pt- -- _ , -1_ _._p.. n m__p_-4.. . -
._7
_7_.4.. , _4_ __p 7 7 l W6( idbf$i$1 C TTIM. M 'pN 395 M,TT Th 7 4, j Th+
! +uquenocuaun ma .
o w a4a n :2+q_gg
- --# :W V)n:10d11 -. nFdanlt @H)34%i.&m33lMyyjlp; t_.p i .;! fig- gLtrggw-tr .____ , . -m+#8M--+L r T--4MAm veMH- H r---b - -lHF-i- w% -
c T2:1 '- !JUm1NI;NTIU MsIs0EU t-- !F i
- C T"_TE_
t-el
, ~C _ t
-a t-- _- ItiHe*dw31-eoeiea wfusFindino 4 q-i .T +4--- 1
+TTU. -a ' 4 -
"j f 7,.g g _ _
_,4 (jyggjIgainOd11jQs)#gq_}q4g, T_7py@T74 71,pff-~:ptN t un Hdvau J . . . . _. . _ ___ _ __ _ _____
g (-- i do dWM 7TO ~ - - '
$ ? . .,,. 0 J . -
3 _ _
.u. .u jo
. a u.
- :O 0 i .,. i - :v i9 i s? v i ij l4 ' g,M' M . f., ". .- .
&f "::: g; .,,__,, 5e !
1 ' t a ~ - c 1
, 5. : , ,,,3
-jF p _i_p .- 79_ - ag . . ,, .t.:f M
~
.. r t.>
w 1-p ; *; ; - Mv,;/ >t2 ., bw -t i "
- , i
~
e w a. i ^^i
,, J., &n w:.:.m w w
a? J'.. w. e i
,.- .._._p_ .
1 i
,G.,m f ;.~...; '.
1
, ..__.___.-._._._ _ i i i g ;. t ,. ;n * .
p.h I
, j ,1;. v ' g?
p r ; ! --tt Q.l[Q W
~
~ ~~
[L ._ ii
\ H"- i kf@f _
LL ___&ia_- % y '.6: *.. 12 ZIl g u@. s
- Ak-M iK1 AAL -
! -' __, __.. 1 V. . !e a
/ -fM-d a r, l
/ 1 !l .! ' i 1: _'-[. ; i .y
/
w.* !
. !1 !' A; _._ a.. e -
-d M -*"9 =! -t-f ii j r ,
i t---i-t-- "-{4- ' I . f ,' a N,. U .'-e.
/'/(s4-i uweh=+ Ed a $i-d sc5 5 x : a _4 ! i
%,--j j /l
,i , i 1
11 i !
.m:. *
..-~SS g t
r z A i %, ,, 1 J i
- , , , n -
i
-+
4~-+
;-m 7 -qi rA i
.. _ 1 I
! 4- PT .i i
!,r! , i i
- c. ,-q 4,4 .g,.y% g 1
e -
- u. e 1 pe ,
i 1 4
. Q,u.t. g kJ Q , E
-s a % 4e , -. h ,
ft-f. 1. .. 4_._ i!!i i! ! a .' i~ i
~ /d5 j ' . . e. .
I ! 7,,_
- DN i"iM ,f l .
. l "Y - ! . l ll! d d-'-ld--h . ' .g., * ,hd ,*. ,
t g5f
.iE g7 !j Wji l l --- 4- '
l' '
, - ai+..
,H3.-q_ !;.g :Q.. .A. fy/
a- gu .; y, , ,i r~ _' Tb i----- 11--
# y~--" t >
-}- ! !
3 ' d :' f T $ M( y% 4 lr#; - 4 c- 8+t - w tL_;r Tx iii.i -
---w- -.;: :
ac
- M Mi i
i siiii _J N i Y
! l ,' 4--
- $',c .
y 4.s
'P
_I% il h+i 1 . , 1 4- .2 i d! ! ! !% . ! i J. -i g,]PiP1U% .ir i l' Nt% i --- - Tl ll , 7('e a-'.,
. u. .g s e, a , ;
N -4
* :; !I '
- c . . :. .x,. _%
%.~-.n Nhr t- e a ' i !r
\% < - .
%. gf $g 7~T' -H "4^+-
- h,a f- , ,
___q, L -
.; __._, z : .i
- --=
.m 4LL: .t.
'y4 siw.J,
-1 1, d, mp-1%
___ 4__
- t > - +
r - 4g. M_ :. l
-d, , 4h
= .
r 1, - -} lI f l Nm i 1_ !-
'l -
! p. :e: V" .
a_ 4 .---w l ! '1 - - e . 1 , yr- o. i ' y< 3;1 1 I t i I i i il i. +_W+ ,t.' . i . J < y ; _._.__2_. __i_. I u, a i iI _, , ! . m-L !;I ; i p;. , ., g I; t_ ;_;,., g. vbr 3.. i r i!
._.1
-y ._-_-..
pj . 4_ _4 r ii 1 i :.
, _ .;g;;.h ;., r . >
-_-q
- ! .2_ w.t
]. -g:
~, j .. ___ .
i l! j L . __ x I N
,!i .1J_ j4 i ri.
l
.m -
1 L ! l ! - i;!'!'- gtv 2e t'. 4}.._ ---~~T-.J
. i
!l ,
IX i w. ii!44 j _.. !
!, ; j.J_. ..
4 _L 44_2 4_ _;' a'1_-1'-q 4. 'I i
- -_ __ ___ Lj_ ,
_--t~~~
. , ;,4.c* ~ -
l _t7. l ' rl
------j
. eh e T' 2 L uA %s**
5
-_[_
, I f- _
__-{. _[__ ' z _4._ . _ _ l: i r=& . ,4;; ,
-_-- __.- a. . y_. -_____-
,_4
- I
.! i 1 . _:_a i 3 s s._
. g. . ,.: , ..
./-g ,,. ..
0-I .--- -p _!_11 . 2_.__.ll i ! , Q g M, 'M l 7 l __.. _ . . . _._. _ l_ -f-4"4"gG
~~~
. _._f_ %_4_,_ _p. i j _- : _
l4 L'.. g _. q _ _n __J_.l_! __.___..04 - I cs - - 4 i a. ti 1 a.t__ t i rj g. , ._. __ . A. 4. _i. 3.___ _ m -----. .+~-+ .-+_-
-~*-i- .j--__I , f.rh-,' tt-'"-"-----
m ,,- :_._.__. py - _.d.d ' ? .4 -._ L s' 1_
-t+
a -..-- la ' ' '
; t-. i 1
._... ! _.,_4 .
_1_. 1i j1--**~~-
. _ __p-... a' ,~i; ~P
+
I - ;
._4_
4 [.__-
~~
h , o.i .j _.,_q it i hrII (( !
-1[UN i i l []r IO'l i i
; i - i i
I ' I l mL S Y N5R g A D 0 3 0
/
0 l p {o, c - l a .,. i S t 4 SY RA n e . ' 3 I I U m n 5 64 9 o 1 r / i 0 v a 5 i 2 c y a
\
orp L I 2
. S ss 4 R s/ 1I I 5
ol 5 la / c 0 fi 0 om 3 e nh oc i/ U) : 1 tm - aa M l e ut ms \ i 7S
.R I isy 5 t
9I I 7 b / r 0 T o) 2 fE 3 D eD l( i ft on 2S re L .R pv 1 s e I 6I e rs ui ss sa eb r pn
/g ei If 1S rs i
.R ue . 3I I tde 5 a r 0 1S
.R r) u 1 i 2I I eAp /
pC o 0 mop 4 1 . eLx 3
. i
.R I T( e lI e
if .. Q _ - 1
- _ _ - - i.
0 0 0 0 5 0 4 2 0 5 0 3 0 3 3 3 2 1 1 8P4ng c5 o$ m5. :juE5 2 aL2 3 O 5 7 z9_c9~$o, m _v0306x5P i
- 3 mg !
l ll
s J3
,, , , - r., a i' r ji p -
a
- 3 p , ;
!! N - : -
,3 i
___..:. 2_. m i r y . . .-
. , . __ , _ _ _L. _. _ ...-. -j- - - - - ~ --
-- g - -
r-
\y i
I I
. _ _[. .
g i, '% I % m i.
. , i_.__, ! -L 4 . . - .-
I y '
' , , t 1 _. ..._ --s ,
$ ; 7 i
_g
.. - ,.._ 4 _ _ ._f___
} - -- g ,
b s_. . .. . _ . . , j
; . -4 : !
2 _ , .
.,j,
, . . _ . IA -
^ ~~*
- .... k ... --
C w [ i
.g & %' a
- s. . .-
1-- --& 5 ' y I o-- - . y u . 5_._ .. .. . . g i .
.K
- a- ' '
s y e_. - -
. 4 a
q R 3__ 7 y I - 2N- . _ % .}}