ML20024E860
| ML20024E860 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1983 |
| From: | Dorsey J DORSEY, J.A., LIMERICK ECOLOGY ACTION, INC. |
| To: | Brenner L, Cole R, Morris P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024E861 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8309070144 | |
| Download: ML20024E860 (1) | |
Text
>
O' JUDITH A. DORSEY TNRC C
LAW OFFICES 1815 WALNUT ST SUITE 1632
~
PWTT. ADELPHIA. PA.19107 215 735.7200 0FFICE OF SECRETAN 00CKETING & SERVIL August 31, 18$ P 8
Lawrence Brenner, Chair Dr. Peter A.
Morris Administrative Judge Administrative Judge U.S. NRC U.S. NRC Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555 i
Dr. Richard F. Cole Administrative Judge U.S. NEC Washington, DC 20555 In the Matter of Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Units l' and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 Gentlemen, Please find enclosed Limerick Ecology Action's SARA /EROL section 7 contentions.
The filing does not include contentions drafted by the City of Philadelphia and coordinated for filing through LEA, due to the fact that the Applicant offered to obtain a 30-day extension for filing for the City (which the Board apparently granted).
I understand the purpose for obtaining the extension was to give the Applicant the opporturity to negotiate the City's contentions, in order to avoid litigation.
The Board should note that LEA's contentions 6 and 7 would have been filed jointly, had the City elected to file.
Thus LEA expects to participate in any negotiations on those contentions.
I recuest the Board to urge the Applicant to negotiate with LEA on its other SARA contentions as well.
I do not think it serves anyone's interests other than the Applicant's to put a wedge between parties with similar interests by treating them separately.
G cerelg,
\\
CA ldN 1
.d Ju ith A.
Dorsey C'unsel for LEA 8309070144 830831 gDRADOCK 05000352 i
--. g sp3j