ML20024E006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Rept of Significant Const Deficiency 72 Re Radiation Monitoring Sys RM-23 Control Modules Mfg by Ga Technologies, Inc.Nonconformance Rept W3-5744 Initiated & Modules Modified.Also Reported Per Part 21
ML20024E006
Person / Time
Site: Waterford 
Issue date: 07/28/1983
From: Drummond F
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Jay Collins
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
REF-PT21-83 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, W3I83-0248, W3I83-248, NUDOCS 8308090018
Download: ML20024E006 (2)


Text

4-s l OUISIANA P O W E R & L i G H T! P O BOX 6008

  • NEW OnLEANS. LOUISIANA 70174 242 OeLanONOe stater
  • (504) 366-2345 MlOOLE SOUTH uTiuriES SYSTEM July 28, 1983 W3183-0248 Q-3-A35.07.72

, -f_= &

t Mr. John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission tj

.L!0,1 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 AIS - 31983 1

hg Arlington, Texas 76012 as

SUBJECT:

Waterford SES Unit No. 3 Docket No. 50-382 Significant Construction Deficiency No. 72

" Radiation Monitoring System RM-23 Control Modules" Final Report

REFERENCE:

LP&L letter W3183-3225 dated July 5, 1983

Dear Mr. Collins:

In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e), we are hereby providing two copies of the Final Report of Significant Construction Deficiency No. 72,

" Radiation Monitoring System RM-23 Control Modules".

If you have any questions, please advise.

Very truly ours, V **'

F. J. Drummond Project Support Manager - Nuclear Attachment FJD/WAC/ MAL:keh cc:

1) Director 3)

Mr. E. L. Blake Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 (w/15 copies)

2) Director 4)

Mr. W. M. Stevenson Office of Management Information and Program Control U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 (w/1 copy)

F308090018 830728 PDR ADOCK 05000382 O

PDR

\\{

.t -

o-s FINAL REPORT OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION = DEFICIENCY NO. 72-

-, - RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEM RM 23 CONTROL MODULES"

~

INTRODUCTION Thisreportissubmittedpursuantto10CFR50.5$(e).. It describes deficiencies

~

which existed in the radiation monitoring system RM-23 modules. This deficiency fis considered reportable under the: requirements of'10CFR50.55(e).

. General Atomic Technologies, Inc. of San Diego, California has informed LP&L-

.that-this problem has been reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. pursuant' cto'10CFR21.

DESCRIPTION GA Technologies Inc.-(the vendor) informed us that1 uring start-up of a GA-d Radiation Monitoring: System at a nuclear' plant, an intermittent lock-up of the RM-23 display was observed. This lock-up apparently causes the " Channel Activity" display to freeze at the most recent activity value for each channel.

~

Initially it was thought that-this condition was an anomaly related to the.

specific castallation. However, as the RM-23 modules are safety related, further studies were conducted, and the results of these studies indicated that a. general-

-design. problem within the RM-23 modules did exist.

SAFETY IMPLICATIONS The main control board alarms for. safety-related radiation monitors are connected to the RM-23 alarm contacts, which are dependent on RM-23 processed data.- These monitors include the containment radiation monitors, the plant--

stack radiation monitors, the Fuel Handling Building radiation monitors, and other post-accident radiation monitors. Without operational RM-23 modules, the

~ control room. audible and visual alarms based on these monitors cannot be 1

i initiated. Although there are safety-related recorders which would provide L

. radiation level information from these monitors as well as other indirect indications of the alarm condition, the primary alarm would be lost-and s

therefore' plant' safety would be affected if this deficiency were left uncorrected.

CORRECTIVE ACTION

-Nonconformance Report W3-5744 was initiated to track and document corrective

. action.

The vendor modified'the RM-23 modules to provide them with more memory capacity which permits computer software changes to eliminate lock-ups.

1 All corrective action.is complete and Ebasco (Engineering and Quality Assurance)

has reviewed and accepted all the supporting documentation.

This report is submitted as the Final Report.

h 9-

-.q.

g

-4.1y--

q w-+gutu-g i er P

+w "4'

-*TPg*

'r4t'+*

y r"

    • +

P9-*-*--

97

--!M"'-vdu

--1

? ' g er g -

pg*p.9 ft

++

4+ wr e s'-

+g---

f--ww

-*P