ML20024D403
| ML20024D403 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000470 |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1983 |
| From: | Meyer G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Miraglia F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8308040722 | |
| Download: ML20024D403 (2) | |
Text
..
er d10 g0' J1Jt. 2 81%3 MEMORANDUM FOR: Frank J. Miraglia, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment Division of Licensing THRU:
Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization & Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing FROM:
Gary C. Meyer, Project Manager Standardization & Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF CESSAR REVIEW Supplement No.1 to the CESSAR SER was published in March 1983. In Supplement No. I we listed three remaining outstanding issues and eight confirmatory issues.
It has been our intention to resolve, as a minimum, all of the outstanding issues before publishing Supplement No. 2.
The CESSAR FDA could then be granted on the basis of the SER with Supplements Nos. I and 2.
To date, we have resolved two of three outstanding issues and six of eight confirmatory issues listed in Supplement No.1.
CE still has to submit on the docket some of the information we used in the resolution of one of the outstanding issues and one of the confirmatory issues.
The only remaining outstanding issue is "ICC instrumentation". At question here is, who has the responsibility for submitting modifications to the generic Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs) to incorporate changes resulting from CE's Heated Junction Thermocouple System. Core Performance Branch will not approve use of the hardware without the EPGs and is requiring CE to submit the EPGs as part of CESSAR. CE has claimed that procedural guidelines are an Owners Group activity and are not part of CESSAR. We are sending a letter to CE to, once again, formally state the staff's position.
I expect this letter' to result in a request for an Appeals meeting.
l 8308040722 830728 DR ADOCK 05000 omce) sunaus >
rue >
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usom asi m.,eo
dl1L 2 81990 Frank J. Miraglia Because of delays in the Palo Verde schedule, the problems in the CESSAR review have not yet had any adverse impactson the Palo Verde review. While I still believe that we can avoid any such impacts, our track record indicates that maybe I shouldn't be so optimistic. We will need the full cooperation of CE and Core Perfonnance Branch in order to resolve the last outstanding issue and clean up the remaining loose ends.
<)
Gary C. Meyer, Project Manager r.
Standardization & Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing DISTRIBUTION:
J cument Control NRC PDR PRC SSPB Reading G. Meyer DL:SSPB
..DL:SSPB OFFICE).....g.4........,..,.
..G..M..e. )..c..o..d....c...
.s........,
SURNAME)
..../.... /. 8 3.....
7 8 3.........
7 om>
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom e-meo NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 024o
,=
..