ML20024C824
| ML20024C824 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/1983 |
| From: | Troffer G METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-01, TASK-04, TASK-1, TASK-4, TASK-GB B&W-0883, B&W-883, NUDOCS 8307130378 | |
| Download: ML20024C824 (6) | |
Text
_
a i
9 9
1
- g. m.s2 4*ea.'w:4. m4 d L' t.
4410 r
1' b.J$
ku u.1M.
.C3U:IS CF SE0033 M CC MA3A Z:CT ACDU Z.6
{
/3_cl(.d [T"'l1T [O Ft1 M l
Attendees:
i e
- /;/#24 A.1
- ::'R I
- 3. 2. Boddan J. Rudolph g
- 3. M. r* *. - ~ =
G. J. Treffer G. F. Miller S. 3. Truskie J. G. Miller A. Tsaggaris (Fer Tra1=ing Partics) 1.
Area 0
" 5 1m b e Pudf=r No. 1 -
Chzeting frem the audit, "The quality of cperaticus person =e1 is on a cet**m 4:vnhill tre=1 due to lack of tra1=1=g." There was emphatic agressect en this, and it vna felt that the root cause its lack of ti=a for both trai=ars and trainees to ;roperly acccuplish traising requirunects. There was a causensus that moving ihm five to siz shifts would solve most of these problems:
Would permit trahees to attend scheduled trais1=g sessicas, taas a.
providiss ret:1 red class time and reduci=g vasted instr =ctor ti=a for i=dividual trais1=g and fallceup.
b.
This would reduce time vasted on supplementary traini=g package de<===atation because traising would be acccuplished in classrocas instead of vasting time for i=dividual traising.
e.
Itzch of the tra.hing responstility lies with th shift foremen, but ther vill act have time to meet this responsibility us*.11 ve so on at: 3h1.~...
(kasittee 3eccamandation: Make the commitment and hata11 six shifts en current target schedule June 1,1978 - Shift Su;ervisers and Shift Foreman Jt:171,1978 - C3c's and A*=7 cperaters Ptsties Te. 3 -
SFf femie? Liceese ?- e-tm Actics:
A. Tsags to obtais MA level IT a;;roval of list of trai=ees a=1,. A te.
Pregran to star. abou: 3-1-73.
?-st=ee "5bi r ?- r-s=.s m 2-Tr. hiivitt.a1 tra*** ! is
=c. tei 3 leveleped, but the trai=1=g is act tei=4 aggressively ;crs ed by either the e.giseers. cr traisers.
Schedules are ;roviied to superrisers fer a;pecirtate trai:1:3 sessi:cs, but these schedules are =ct readily available to all.
A -t s:
A. Tsaggaris vill i=ves-igate schedule iistributics a d take corrective actica as necessary.
W 45173 8307130378 830713 PDR ADOCK 05000289 p
HOL
l e
e O
l i
l
?
/
i 2
P efesstecal revel: =ent Et Assess =ent of the i=divihal is rPquired 13 Crder to egs4re traisi=g progras =ests needs.
C:t=1tsenti G. P. Miller stated that eve.ry SC engineer vill have been naspever assessed by *.he er.d of 19*$.
E1""/PT Sof eeber Cet:-se A. Tsaggaris vill i=restigate desirability /;rscticality of as after- -
hears Capital Camryss Professier.s1 Z=siseer Ref: esher (PIR) Course.
S. 3. T:askie stated that fi=an=ial su;;cr. for tuitica voulite,u..ded f=r this. Although it was agreed that is the =aj=r part the i=divihal is resicasible f=r his evn pr=fessissal devolm,_e=t, it is quite diffi= ult far the i=divitzal at TC because of cures =t veiking c=nditicus.
Mr Manage =ent to take acticus necessary to redu=e ex:essive over-time so that the engineers will have ti=e availabla for trai=ing and professional develo;nent.
Qualificati = P-c-as fer _. sineers v
It was felt that the progren as designed is adequate but that we =nst use what we have.
- e su;ervisars must see that emphasis and time available is given and then the faiividual =nst pursue his een q:.alifications.
Mr A. Tsaggaris and G. P. Millar to meet with supervisors and address specific acticas ;cesible to echa=ce tra1=1:s and gr.alificatics progrs=s.
Pt.=dise Yo. 3 " st= ins for other tha= C eratie s ?erse el Mat =t se e= ee A. Tsaggaris described the TPC t.a1=ing program scheduled to stars Aurast 1, 19*S.
He reycried the enthusiastic accepta=ce by maista=ance supervisory persen=el. It was ;cisted cut that five shifts vice the current fcur vill he ret: ired if trat=ing geals are to be ace:m;11shed.
Ped / Chem. Techs.
- e hist.rical questics of vtether to separate rsdistics asi a*- 'st:7 j:b classifics:1cas was discussed.
Agl;ig;gy A. Tsaggaris and C. P. Miller to discuss with R. hhial ami E. Frederick at the = ext t.ai=ing =esting.
Sitcatien *-si-int J. G. Miller noted that Penelse has devel:;ed a =aister.e==e truising progras that utilizes specific rs; air /overtaul situati:cs for focused
- 'i***8' W 451SO Action:
A. Tsaggs.ris to centact 3. Retri:k with res;ect to the s;ecifi:s of the Penelse situatics traini=g program.
~
3 Sumeretsen *-st=ist Trills A. Tsaggaris stated he vill,... de trai=1:4 to devel:3 such s' kills whenever a
- --t is =ade to attend and utilize such tr**
- g.
Findi=r Yo. k - !=e-rise-v Sevel-me=t P-er-tm This was discussed and it was =oted that the progran is well receive 1.
One day refresher c=urses will be develayed, pr=bably sert year.
?'-d*-5No.9-Tai.1:eCeseler?teilities
'l'ha c=rrent short-ters corrective efforts vers noted and there was a consenns that the lons-ca=ge facility requi.ezents abou14 de addressed by =anageme=1 en an urgent basis, (i.e. Service **? '*-e).
II.
- eb Classifien*ies vs. Amec=t of Over-ine tv. Cemeensatten J. Buds 1;h provided tabulated data that demonstrates certain c=spessati:n inequities between Unisa and Su;ervis=ry persennel. He stated that this data is being presented to the Persec=e1 C==;ensatics C:smittee is order to chtnis loca range soluti=ns. With respect to one-ti=a compensatian for these supervisers that have a history of excessive 0.T. is the recent ;ast, J. Eudolph will develop specific rectasesdaticas enc =spassing bcusses or
- aid time off.
- . Restensibility and Accountaht11**
This subject was c;e=ed again becense of serious interests is the matter, and it was requested that Prtbies No. 32, tras D. Estrick's 1975 Asdit Re;crt, te reed isto the mi=utes of the meeting:
There is a great deal of duplication of effer en verk requests.
reviewing same document 3 or 6 times sisce each verk recess must be reviewed. Many times too or acre pec;1e are assia=ed the sa=a
- rebles and verk is par 11al. The same memo is sent to several people indicati=g ther are to take actica so each goes to serk cn the problem. E=giseers are assig=ed to check on work that a fare.
aan has also been assia=ed to check. Probles re;cres filed net aMable so same problem is re;crted several times. Got nem to check esi;aent a=4 found that another e=gineer had teen assig=ed the same task a week earlier and the work was airseiy dene. llup.
11 cation of effort seen to be a planned th1=g at Met-Ed is Reading and at the site. Management sho*. guns ;rchlens, assig=ing tasks directly to ;eople three level.s tel=w. Precedu.es for work requests get assig=ed to several pee;1a. Ouplicatica cf of cri is the biggest and nest ti=e ccesum1=g ;rchlan we have. T=; supervisors are afraid to delegate resicasibility so they assign serreral ;ec;1e.o ;erfar=
same task.
The pre;csed state =ent ececer:1:g res;cesiti*ity, authority, accountability and chais of cc _asd that was attached to the Marth 16, 1973 =esti=g mi=utes has been red. rafted and is attached to these _'.=utes.
~.
W 451S1
)
k-
- 17. Ares to - ?etir !s*ablis'=e_t a.d hairatien Iach poi =t =m's in this area of the a:dit has alren# tee addressed by the review
- ttee.
7.
Area 11 - ?-ee e-tvi v a=d tende-shis Fi=di.s No. 1 - P=ata -ivi'v G. P. Miller reported that the =ight crier took f=r tack shift =ai=te=a==e superviscrs is being devel=;ed tr D. Sherlis e=4 vill, is effect, tell the persc==e1 what is az;ected fM s them en a given shift.
Fi= dins Yo 2 T= effective ?ar*:t-amee of a ?tv Ferce=
It was noted that the level I Ma=;crer Assess =e=t Cdttee,vith the CC Su;eri=ta=de=t, is taki=g effective actica i= this area a=4 additi =al acticus are =ot @ ed.
Findi-r No. 3 - ? eea-stie= fe? a=d Ce= duct of veeti=rs The ecmittee accepts this as a valid f*-'*M a=d reccmends that the CC Superi=tendent i=itiate action to femalize certai= aspects of the pre-paratics ami conduct of mee*.ings, i=a'-d**g advance,...lsics of agenda where a,ja late.
G. 7. Millar stated this is already being &c=a ter the weekly staff meeti=gs.
7.
Area 12 - Tecilit*es Findi t No.1
- =silere. Sa::itare ?acilities a=d F= =1*u o G. P. Miller stated that a detailed servey of ;r:ble=s in these areas are u=da-vay a=1 that reec=ecistiens f=r actics will be f:rthec=t=g. irith respect to the f==iture situatica the ccumittee strec. gly recc=ne=ded that f=r=1ture =ecessary f=r proper effice c;eratic=s he f::=ded a=1 purchased as scen as detailed rer:1rs=ents can he deter =i=ed.
As i=;cr a=* aspect of this is the large eacust of peerly stowed excess dec =e=tatics that results frca i=adegaate==bers of filing cati =ets, a=4 other stcrage facilities. A prepcsed solutica veuld to to ;reperly sort this =atarial, i=dex that which is to be retai=ed, =i=refilm a:d then discard d:c=e=tatics where ;rac.icable.
G. J. Treffer is to.*:rther i=vestigate this ave =ue.
?*=di-r to. 2 - Reusekeest-r G. P. Miller re;crted thats Il=;hasis is tei=g ;1 aced en ;reper housekee;1=g at CC.
a.
h.
Fore.e= are reesired to sis:-off at the e=d cf each vert reisest that the Jeb site has been cleased up.
c.
Specific area i=s;ectics assis==e=ts are bei=g ade to e=sure every area receives periedi: atta= tic = for =les=11=es s.
d.
All persc==e1 are to be held acccu= table fer cleasi=g u; af.er tha=selves.
W 45182
5-C.
Ar.s !?
vamever a:d v -=i=:e tevels a
Each ;oist made is this area of the audit has airesd7 heen add.ressed by the review ecunittee.
C.
- e next esting vill to held en April 24, 1978 at 9:30 a.s. is the 3ertshire 3c1111 g's l'rminiss Recs. Mr. 3aney a=1 Es. lapinski have been invited to discuss, specific stores ;rchless. Mr. Retrict has bees isvited to discuss the 19T5 2 C Nanagement Audit.
/'
O. J L criam/
GJ:l:tas Chai w.
Attact:aest cc: Atte::isee J. G. Earteis J. J. Colitz
%,Li;L *Aeriri D. E. Retrica W 45183 9
i A1 *ach:*.e=*
M MC C
- 4 Reseensitiliw/Au-he-tw/Aeeeu=talili--e a-d Chais of C::=and h the interes. of 1,.c ^. g overall ;erfor=ance of Ceneratien these policy state se=ts Eave *.een devel=;ed for use as a standard assi=st vtich t= c== pare masass=ent actic=s is the assig==est of res;casittlity, the delegatics of su*Mty, the hold 1=g of i= die.hals accou= table and the observasce of the chais of cen=a=d.
Sese are accepted as tread pri=ciples fer general applicatics is ordar to,..we a better u=dersta di=g of orgn=1:sti=nal relaticeships, i= prove i:ter:a1 eta =uu=i=sti:ns and e= hance the job ;erf:: ance of the 1 divihals. It is i= tended that the se=1er managers is the Oeseratica lll1visien cen=it *.o these ;ri==iples.
Res e sttiliw. Anthe-tw a=d Accetetatiliw faska vill te assis=ed, cbjectives vill te devel=;ed a=d i=divihals vill be held ta ac cunt for perfer=ance of tasks a=d attai==e=t of objectives such that res;cusitility, azztherity a=d accou=tability are all is cc= cert. Res;c=sibilities will be as az;1icit as the ci.mances regire and vill ner= ally to assig=ed to a specific i=dividual at a given level of supervisica, and the i=divihal vill te delegated an hcrit7 ccanansurate with that responsibility. The imiiv" *1 assig=ed a rosycesitilit7 vill be hali acccuntable for carrying it cut. Specifically, a given task will not te assig=ed several ;ecyle is the he;e that at least ene of theia vili carry it to a successf.11 cenclusion.
Chain of C ~ ^
h crder to clarify the tou=daries of res;c=sitility a=d e=therity a=d to hel; prevent misu=ders*=-d* gs, the chais of c=m=asd as defissd by the Generatics organizatics charts will nor=alir te observed is the issuance of oriars and directicas either across orgn=1sstional 11:es er by a se=icr to a ju=icr is the organizatten char.. *is vill i=clude the submissien of re; orts. Regarilass of the chais of c=m=a=d, free a=d direct exchange of i=for=atics as dee=ed practical and desirable 57 the more se=i=r persen=e1 vill he enc =urzged so as to a-ha-as the f1=v of 2=criedge a=d ideas.
W 45184 e.
l l
. _ _. _ _ _