ML20024C484
| ML20024C484 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1978 |
| From: | Taylor J BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| To: | Deddens J BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-03, TASK-3, TASK-GB GPU-0255, GPU-255, NUDOCS 8307120681 | |
| Download: ML20024C484 (5) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.h33 1. i 2 %C I i t' h i -u y a 9 5 4 j c I 8307120681 780414 DR ADOCK 05000289 p HOL
i s t .- ~ ~; i ~ a t 2 J. THE BASCCCX 4 'All.CCX CCMPANY PCWER SENERATION GRCUP M /, J. C. DCDINS - MANAGA. EN4INII21NG '~ i. J. a. hrr.on. Naan, uC:NsINa a NRD& MAL cu,p3 c st. m men mn v - .t- .m. er tet. PLANT INCIDENT' IVAI.UATICNS ApRII,14, 1373 i-be preSometime ago it was decided that a site probles report would days. pared for any incident on a 38W plant causing lost capacity it would sees appropriate for us to consider establishing aAs a systes might. otherwise require. routine practice of going further than the s into effect a sanagement policy which calls for a detailed -It is suggested that lacident report for every significant incident affecting a 34W....... _, plaat. The purpose of these incider:t je. p-the incident. to the point where what happened was thoroughlyreports would be to p understood and that corrective actions could be outlined sucia h that all ressonabit things had been done to minial possibility of the same or similar occurrences on o:e the i operating plants. ther 33W sore than opersting procedure recommendations, but,In some cases, th in others, f. - --it could i'avolve recommended hardware changes. ( If this were done, it wo61d seem that several benefits cVul'd' ~ ~ ~ accrue to 34W. 1. Cur aca11 ability record would be enhanced, 1. 4 If this policy of in-depth, follow-through evaluation were i t ande known to the NRC, it could be that they would persi: a plant e.tperiencing an incident to return to power more f '.l quickly if they knew an in. depth analysis was being done y and would be followed by a detailed, report. I. - 3. It could make points with the NRC *i*n tarms af mini =i:ing [E the effee: on other opersein: -14.. : h:casse of an incident g on cue plasc, p 4 It could lead to new business in terms of procedurs @4 revisions and hardware redesign, 3. It could p'rovide a better understanding of our plants and, specifically, i.e., it could lead to desirsble improvements.in the area of systems intera ? G.eu-7 r,- see;Ed.Forin 955 2 .. _..m ~...s.-:..~., 00Yle RehctSNg fr[c. 5$5llh[ c j 32s } o 5 3 9 l-p g 9 .p gm L = i. g
.. ;L_.. = Li [ J. C. ::eddens of * ."psge 2 April 1[,1973 ' s . r, \\ 9 i The recent letter that was written by Mr. Karrasch to Mr. e8 is cannection with the SHUD incident. It also appears as thou asce unde,r Mr. Mayo is also a 20o4 step in this direction .i would seem that the record of five iscidents of NaCH in ectica It on our plants is an example of isadequate follow throu . y1 In view of the above, , a complets follow through on every incident, and, as a result,I recom g-both It'd and our custcas s will benefit. JHT:dsf i l es: z. a. raae j, M/ i F. J. Levandoski G. E Clds i D. N. Ray ' t R. I. Wascher G. 3. Kalynych 4 *,' k r e* 2 C -l }- o J. i t ':n. ] ->e .,l i. k! 4; g-. j h n. 5: t:3: e.. b i 1 g" [ l' 17.'. f, i f:- -1 .L g i. t__ ... 1 b---
l \\ 4 t g. ~ .h (,k I' )p 42} ~ THE SA8cccx & WILcox c::MPANY J. H. Taylor !'.%ER GENERATION GRCUP ') AFR 2 01 / 1 ,u ,, p 1 J. L TayIst - Manager. I.la 'I Free u r F. L Fahland = R&B Manager. Essaarth & Develsoment Sess 4 .d l Cent 'Fil s 88.f /
- h'Q,)' *,
t/ / .e ssi. 3*8)+ /,, ' {f[ Date Plans Imatdant 2 valuations I April 19. 1973 '/f. g re. e Enferanset Tser letter, same subject, dated Apraf 14.1973 e 1. Yeme W==4-= P for complate follow through es evalmaties of I plans Lasidents ia ensallans. It seriza implamensatism. I II 1. Attashed is an indicaties that Cambesties Zag 1amertas already has a progran of skis natures P d 1 Se fast chas XPCB has es novaal process, to ammage (i.e., ta identi.*y, [ 45 eP to pswesesse review, and to elese-ees) evaluaties of cessly, ree.cative inasdents aeroes internal lines of responsibility sense that the Iow. the liho, and the 7tmeding asyests of as evaluattaa procese need considered ,7 soggestises. 4 As year conveniense. I iseuld like to disease wit.h you approaches es [ implemmatac1se of year sotaescias. y gA- - e l
- r. a. rahland g(psesd,.'
,s. --. t. /p.4 m4/
- a.,ez,.,.h a/
T h OMO.. hf;w,' t.u' ~~ Y ~ 9 T i L f f* /,M 6 I Y / s A. g
- E lT
's e i F 15,'9 2 9 7J 325 0440 t ~ l_ t ~ e- -4 m ___,---,.,we ._,.,y,,,.y, m.y...- ..,.,,.-.-7. ,9 y-_.-r.--, -., -, - - -. -., - - ---,.-.-.-_iy
[ i e j e __ t r.' _ _ '. _.. =r ~ . ~.. . g, ; -...,. - .s,-*-..- ., g ga*c g,
- ..i w
. p..... CJ 3 ras 111 to 31stributies Page > ,$eht,s AIT Ad Ese Cammittee es Systees lateracties - 10/11/*7 10/18/77 Itsettas 4 3 Q) AIF (Canady and $salay) will testaat 32C (Angelo and de Teess) to get a better feeling for their adniaistrative, pel.icisal, and teshaical problems and fseure plane. Assele and es T)ess will be invited to address the Ad -{ Ese Committee. 3e further cemenittes action is planned prior to thi,e time (empested sensact will b. La early.her) and the aest asettaa v11f. be enheduled asserdiagly. 4 Other itene of interest that were severed durias the discussies are as fellowes (1) Persteipeats sukuitted their vieve and pesi.d.one es Systems faseracties -.1' prior to the asettas. Capies are attached for your inferaaties. Of Partientar incarest.is the paper by Eeuotes Power & Light. Q) Only 3 alt appears're have a separata groep dedicated to the integrantes fanation and seus 1statest was empressed is this sensept. Bewever, all amabers fait that they adequately asesuplished these fues:1ees is other ways and felt that they could e.and vp to en Tts audit. This was partly borne ese by Angels and de Teust's review of stees & itekster's and 71aer. Pieness's systema for project design. C) All patrias agreed that the greatest ages of vulnerability la the future [' is electrisal. his wee attribosed to the elast.-ical discipliae's view ), that electrical is a systen este itself ra h r than a espport functies g end their refesal to get involved with other systems and 11aansing require = asses. i (4) 8*-Sch Edises has bees asked en ties to review all 121's ('.Leessee Importense 2eports) since 1869 to deternise veether plant changes are aseded. This is as estremely di!!1 cult feb due te (1) the large sim.ber ed 1.ER's (%13.300 stase 1249). (2) the !sraet and concent is vague and seafusing, and (3) the review can only be perfor=ad by very seleet, espefiesand people. 12 this effort ta to tentzaus. it was falt that we should sake arrancesants with ce staff te allow the first " ut" ts be "j dose only once se that each ayplicant seed =et i= dependently review all \\ 121'e. m (3) Comtesties descrited their pescess for revtee.sg prshlaas with their operating plaats (eqsivalaat to ser 3??.'s) and iscarporating them in their design. Teve people are assigned full time and Ladividuals is eneh of.the discipl1=e groups are dasignated to support t.9e effort. T.,
- hey publish a 2,3tindie ? der..ttich it.aludes a seary of renaris j
resolutions of eaes mates and starts of implacentasise es eacs contract. 1 M eve aur saiar. is tais ares skvald be expanded La lists of the l..s t eyetame interastias esseerns and would suggest the CE apersash and level 1 ed staffias. ., l. "} G)
- aitially the Staff (John Angel') proposed a couplete plaat ofmalatias s
L t ta address ce 3.1. questicas however. this was rejected by the divisies .. J. dissat=rs. 7 air p:5.ast :tatath :,n i :.su 9:.t.L4:. i.e.#.Ae m.4* M -[ estresse is tesespt Cout =st nesssaart.y detsils) of 2e divtsian tira:tyry,,, / j salis for the fallsvings /={8* j ;,., ;*O G-* M,.j
- ,. -,, g,9,,.eW #/
',,N J . Y, Q.a&. 4 j. .,,..w.->-- ~ ]
- g g g g" 9
325 10 5 /+ 4... t L j' l-.. f. ---n,
,--a,,,--,e-.-
- - - - - - -}}