ML20024C446

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards C-E Program for Plant Incident Evaluations,In Response to .Meetig Requested to Discuss Implementation of 780414 Recommendation
ML20024C446
Person / Time
Site: Crane  
Issue date: 04/19/1978
From: Fahland F
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
To: Taylor J
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
References
TASK-03, TASK-3, TASK-GB GPU-2601, NUDOCS 8307120633
Download: ML20024C446 (2)


Text

_ '

_3

~

f(). N yf

=

,-..e.

f,'y

, ~..,

e O

\\

=

.-.a..

g q,.:44 d' o

~

THE SA8C0CK & Wil.COX COMPANY f

J Tsyter I

,}WERGENERATIONGROUP

[/

Ng gg I

M J. L Taylor - Maasser. Lieg i. c.-/W" t

  1. 6 i

Free i

F. L Fakta=J - R&D Manager, tesearch & Developaest SecrW

. d zu eaa.a

e..

./-

w.

.p v,

/

er Ret.

4, SutJ.

Date

(/ fLP

!p "

Plant Iseident Evaluations i

April 19, 1978

)R '

4 gn e

l Esferences Tour letter, same subject, dated Apr11'14, 1978 1.

Year recessendaties for couplate follow through es evaluaties of I

plant incidents is esca11est. It merits implementaties.

l 2.

Attached is en indication that Combusties Engineering already has a program of this naturae l*

I 3.

The feat that NFCD has se normal process to manage (i.e., to identify, k

4!

$P to prosecute review, and to close-out) ovaluatian of castly, repetitive Lacidents across internal lines of responsibility seams that.the Iow,

' L t

the 1the, and the Funding aspects of an evaluation process need considered suggestians.

3 L

4 At your convenience. I would like to discuss with you approaches to i

implementatios of your suggesties.

5 a.

,aaa.d FIFicer At'tachment f.( 1.,bl.

di

/

es c. g. ratynych IV h

t,,,% -

  • * "' y r

(I,( p.C &lf 6

k s f,.

AM Y f

}1 y,

}

)

8307120633 780419 1

PDR ADOCK 05000289

.l.I.

P HOL.

~,

L -' : --

F 1 5 ' 9 2 9 7)

[

325 jo 5 4 9 L

4*.....

V..

l..,-.1-./.4.

1**

. _ ?_.

_:..2.

=

s l

  • = - -

=

.s, *. -= =.

. g.my s ggl=.,,-.i.w -,g

=g. ~.....

CJ3 ras 111toDistribuckea Fase the

  • Subj' A::T Ad Eoc Cosmittee es Systers Istaracties =

10/21/27 10/18/77 Meettag e

l (3) AIF (Canady and Stalay) will sentact 3tc (ingelo and de foung) to get a better feeling for their administrative, political, and technical problems and future plaas. Angelo and de Youas will he invited to addrese the Ad

{

Eos Comittee. No farther ceanittee acties is planned prise to this time (expected sentact will be is early Nevenber) and the mest meeting will be scheduled asserdingly.

t other 1:eas of interest that were severed during the discussion are as follows:

4 (1) Participants submitted their views and posittens en Systems Interastiam prior to the meeting. Copies are attached for your informaties. Of persicular interest.is the paper by Neustos Power & Light.

(2) Caly 3&lt appears'te have a separate grevp dedicated to the integraties functies and some interest was expressed f a this concept. Bewever, all naabers felt th4t they adequately accomplished these functions is other ways and felt that they could stand up to as NRC audit. This was partly borne est by Angelo and de Teung's review of Stese & Webster's and Fluer=

l Pisaeer's systems for project design.

(3) All parties agreed that the greatest area of vulnerability La the future is electrical. *his was attributed to the electrical discipline's viev that electrical is a systaa unto itself rather thaa a support functies M.

and their refusal to get invgived with other syntess and licensing require-

~

t meats.

t, (4) Cemenwesich Edises has been aske'd es ties to review all 1ER's (Licaceae Esperience Reports) since 1969 to deter =ise vbether plant changes are needed. This is an extremely difficult job due te (1) the large number ief LER's (S13.000 since 1969) (2) the for=at and content is vague and confweiss, and (3) the review can ecly be perfor:ed by very select.

experienced people. If this effort is to continue. it was felt that we should make arrangements with the 3taff te allow the first " cut" to be done only esce se that each applicant need set independently review all

\\

LER's.

(3) Combusties described their process for reviering proble.s with their operating plaats (equivalent to avr 57F.'s) and incorporating then La their design. Tour people are assigned full time and individuals is each of the disciplice groups are designated to support the effort.

Zhey publish a.p,3ti,gjd,1.f_IE22I.t which ittludes a su :.ary of gen,eg.g g

.":j resolutions of _each 3rebles and starts el 1:ple=entation en esca centract.

I Taf S e sur effort in tais area should be expanded is light of the j

systens interacties concerns and would suggest the CZ approach and level e

1 of staffias.

}

(6) Initial}y the Staff (John Angels) prepased s cc=plete plant simulaties t

' to address the 3.1. questiest however, this was rejected by the divisies t

l M

dirt.ctors. ? air pet.4:2 tutata. tatas t u 6.i: v*.ac~1.u.Aeev.=

1 surrence in =encept (' ut =ot actassar1Ay detsils) of the divisita dirs:ty;

[

7 a

I as11s for the followings

{

I

+ :e..;;u.w w

u.

.L

.,,p

/..

- +

'=s

^

F i s 79 2 9 s]

- ~-

32s lo 5 4 ;-4..

g.

--.=-

g _ _ _.- _ _ - _ _ _ - - -

L u