ML20024C353
| ML20024C353 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1983 |
| From: | Gleason J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| References | |
| 81-466-03-SP, 81-466-3-SP, ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8307120546 | |
| Download: ML20024C353 (5) | |
Text
._
%D
,6
/-
,/ 93_ ^ '
f\\
g.,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION U
SA i 11983 '- R ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD b
ce. c m osee.
\\!j og: & sy.
Before Administrative Judges:
James P. Gleason, Chairman P
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Frederick J. Shon In the Matter of
)
)
Docket Nos. 50,147 SP CONSOLIDATED EDIS0N COMPANY
)
)
)
ASLBP 81-466-03 SP (Indian Point, Unit No. 2)
)
)
POWER AUTHORITY.OF THE STATE
)
0F NEW YORK
)
)
(Indian Point, Unit No. 3)
)
July 8,1983 ORDER
~
(TranscriptCorrections)
On April 29, 1983, the Board requested that the parties file motions for transcript corrections by May 15, 1983 (Tr. 15224-25); and by Order dated May 13, 1983,. the Board extended to June 15 the date on which those motions were due. On June 15, the NRC Staff and the Licensees each filed transcript corrections. No other party has filed transcript corrections, and no party has opposed the Staff's or Licensees' motion.
The Board has reviewed Licensees' and Staff's motions, and con-cludes that, with a few exceptions, the proposed corrections are accurate. Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR 1 2.750(b), the Board approves the Staff's and Licensees' proposed corrections, except as follows:
8307120546 830708
{DRADOCK05000g 3 502
- c. A.
NRC Staff Transcript Corre;tions 1.
The Staff proposes a correction to the word " mode" on page 6583, line 9.
The word " mode" is used twice on that line, and only the second should be corrected.
2.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 6625, line 12, should read " Staff has under "
3.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 7195, line 1, should
~
be to page 7197, line 1.
4.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12886, lines 8,10, and 12, should be to page 12286, lines 8,10, and 12.
5.
In the Staff's proposed correction to page 12322, line 18,
" examination" should be " evacuation."
6.
The proposed correction to page 14641, line 20 is rejected.
g 7.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12498, line 22, should be to page 12498, line 21.
8.
The Staff's prop % ed correction to page 12528, line 17, should read " MARCH 1.1."
9.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12530, line 22, should read *106."
10.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12533, line 18, should only change "being" to "being condensed."
11.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 13563, lina 3, should be to page 12536, line 3.
That correction should only change "with Fracturing" to ", at Factory Mutual."
- 12. The Staff's proposed correction to page 125'29, line 8, should read "Battelle Columbus."
r w-
. 13. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12849, line 6, should be to page 12840, line 6.
- 14. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12868, line 7, should only change "After absolute" to "For an absolute"
- 15. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12880, line 17, should only delete the word "it" the last time that word occurs on the line.
- 16. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12886, line 8, I
should read "A. (Witness Rowsome) They"
- 17. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12886, line 9 is rejected.
Instead, on that line " release significantly well.
I"
~
should be changed to " releases. Significantly? Well, I"
- 18..The Staff's proposed correction to page 18993klines 20, 21, l
and 22, should be to page 12993, lines 20, 21, and 22.
19.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12917, line 24, should be to page 12917, line 25.
20.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12922, line 19, should change "than average site and" to "than the average site in" 21.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12926, line 5, should be to page 12926, line 6.
22.
The Staff's correction to page 12927, line 10, should read "A.
(Witness Rowsome) Yes."
23.
The Staff's proposed correction to page 12931, line 12, should read "A. (Witness Rowsome)". And on the next line, "A. (Witness Rowsome)" should be deleted.
+
- 4'-
- 24. The Staff's proposed correction to page 12939, line 8, is rejected.
4
- 25. 'The Staff's proposed correction to page 12954, line 14, is rejected; the words the Staff proposes to correct do not appear on that page and line.
- 26. The Staff's proposed correction to page 14132, line 10, should change "of- " to "of 61.6 percent" B.
Licensees' Transcript Corrections 1.
In Licensees' proposed correction to page 2028,.line 2, it is the name "0sining" that should be changed to "0ssining" 2.
Licensees' proposed correction to page 2125, line 24, should change "were previous" to "was no previously"
~
InadditiontoLicensees'proposedcorrectionh,'onpage6553, 3.
line 15, the words "a clearing" should be changed to "occuring" 4.
Licensees' proposed correction to page 7351, line 9, is
{
rejected.
5.
Licensees' second proposed correction to page 11718, line 2, i
is rejected.
e 6.
Licensees' proposed correction to page 12001, line 6, is rejected; instead "to proceed," should be changed to
",to pursue."
7.
Licensees' proposed correction to page 12002, line 1.-is rejected.
I
~ ~
~
, 8.
Licensees' proposed correction to page 12003, line 7, should change "Lecker its universal," to "(Witness Lecker)
Its universal" IT IS SO ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD W
0A
~
was,, war,e sig James P. Gleason, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Bethesda, Maryland July 8,1983 i.
4 l
l l
i
[.
l.
l b'
.. -.