ML20024C163
| ML20024C163 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/07/1983 |
| From: | Arnold R GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20024C161 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8307120347 | |
| Download: ML20024C163 (4) | |
Text
METROPOLITAN E0ISON COMPANY XRSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY GPU NUCLEAR TiflEE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION UNIT II Operating License No. OPR-73 Docket No. 50:320 Technical Specification Change Request No. 42 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of Licensee's request to change Operating License No. OPR-73 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2.
GPU NUCLEAR By
'h President Sworn a subscribed to me this 4 d day of
, 1983,
' fn, X $ -
(/~
4410 M Notaat P h KLTCE 5. R OU 55
. norm resuc or anr mm l
h C%Iot bites Marrt 7,1HE 8307120347 830707 DRADOCK05000g
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MTTER OF DOCKET NO. 50-320 LIENSE NO. DPR-73 GPU NtILEAR This is to certify that a copy of Technical Specification Change Request No.
42 to Operating License DPR-73 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2, has, on the date given below, been filed with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and been served on the chief executives of Londonderry Township, Datphin County, Pennsylvania and Datphin County, Pemsylvania by deposit in the United States mail, addressed as follows:
Mr. Jay H. Kopp, Chairman Mr. John E. Minnich, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Board of County Commissioners Londonderry Township of Dauphin County R. D. #1, Geyers Church Road Dauphin County Court House Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Mr. Thomas M. Gerusky, Director Bureau of Radiation Protection PA Department of Environmental Resources l
P. O. Box 2063 l
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 l
GPU NUCLEAR By
/f 8M President l.
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (TMI-2) 7 Operating License No. DPR-73 Docket No. 50-320 I.
Technical Specification Change Request No. 42 The licensee requests that the attached revised pages 2-1 through 2-16 replace the following pages of the existing Technical Specifications.
Appendix B replace 2-1 through 2-15.
II. Reason for Change The atta&ed change pages reflect changes to Appendix B Section 2, Limiting Conditions for Operation, to delete reference to requirements for Unit 1 monitoring, instrumentation, and valves that relate solely to the operation of lkilt 1.
'The changes only relate to deleting Unit 1 components while all Unit 2 requirements remain unchanged. The original reason for including Unit I requirements in the Unit 2 Te&nical Specifications was because the Unit 2 Te&nical Specifications provided a convenient vehicle to assemble both Unit 1 and Unit 2 environmental specifications in one location as station requirements. Because of the now separate organizations responsible for managing and operating the two TMI Units 1 and 2, and because the Unit 1 Te&nical Specifications have been modified to incorporate the appropriate requirements for Unit I within the Unit 1 Technical Specifications (See TMI-1 Licensee Amendment 72), it is no longer necessary to include the deleted Unit I requirements in the Unit 2 Te&nical Specifications.
l The changes in eadi case represent simple deletions of Unit 1 components and the language is unchanged with respect to lkilt 2 requirements. This change will avoid confusion between placement of requirements for Unit 1 in both thit 1 and lkilt 2 Technical Specifications.
III. Safety Evaluation Justifyina Chanaes This change does not involve any change in actual requirements for either Unit 1 or lkilt 2.
The requested Unit 1 deletions are already included in appropriate form in Unit 1 Technical Specification Section 3.21 and 3.22 and Section 4.21 and 4.22.
This change has been proposed primarily to avoid confusion between placement of requirements for ik11t 1 in both Unit 1 and lkilt 2 Te&nical Specifications.
l l
It has been determined that since this change is purely administrative involving no actual change in requirements:
l.
The probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety previously evaluated in the safety analysis report is not increased.
2.
The possibility of an accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the safety analysis report is not increased.
3.
The margin of safety defined in the basis of any Technical Specification is not reduced.
Therefore, the proposed change does not constitute an Unreviewed Safety Question, or a significant hazard consideration.
IV Amendment Classification (10CFR 170.22)
This change is administrative in nature, having no safety or environmental significance and is therefore considered a Class II License Amendment. Accordingly, a check for $1,200 is enclosed.
V Implementation It is requested that NRC approve these changes with implementation upon approvsl because it will have no material impact on operation.