ML20024B745
| ML20024B745 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1983 |
| From: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8307110305 | |
| Download: ML20024B745 (2) | |
Text
--__
f INCIPAL STAFF
'A MEMNF
/
.r V R 7/RA SCS V
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
$"^
43
~
g DRf4A RC P.O. Box 2325. BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 OPMSF DE ML OL l FILE W Mr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III June 30, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No.
14509 799 Roosevelt Road NRC File #83-06-30 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
SUBJECT:
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW (June 23,1983)
A copy of observations noted by CIO of the Management Review Committtee of the discussions relating to the Bulk Hanger Organization (BH0) is attached for your review and consideration. CIO has commented upon three subjects and have indicated conditional approval of BH0.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (517) 631-4286, extension 486.
Very truly yours, b'Kf S. W. Baranow Program Manager Enclosure SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, NRC Midland (site)
DBMiller, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APamaruso, S&W DESIGNATED ORIGIIIAL Co1~ tit $e3 gyf g,,, [,
O 5 BB3 8307110305 830630 P M A D D G 0 5 0 0 0 ig g Igg
l CIO OBSERVATIONS OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (MRC)
MEETING
SUBJECT:
BULK HANGER ORGANIZATION A meeting was convened by MRC on June 23, 1983 for discussion of the Release of Area and System Teams to start statusing. An agenda was distributed prior to the meeting.
All the members of the MRC were in attendance and actively participated in the proceedings. Key team members of CPCo, MPQAD and Bechtel were present. The handouts and the presentation covered the subject of discussion in definitive and understandable detail.
CIO reports the following observations:
1). Audit responses, once addressed should not be readdressed unless responses are inadequate.
In particular the question of all training requiring an examination or qualifying test was raised at an earlier MRC meeting and again, at this session.
There appears to be two schools of thought on requirements for exam'7ations. The audit group (CPCo) is taking the position that examinations are all encompassing while 3M0 favors examinations only for those personnel having accept / reject responsibilities. The position of across the board examinations or for the accept /
reject responsibility only should be clearly established.
2). Observations by the Review team should be presented to MRC, in one document, several days priorto meeting date. This would enable MRC to respond in full at the meeting and avoid " conditional" approval of the review subject.
3). Restraints require expeditious resolution.
The restraints presented to MRC at this session were of a minor nature and should have been cleared prior to the meeting or the meeting postponed until restraints are removed. As in (2) this would allow approval to be considered at the meeting. At present
" conditional" approval by MRC is discussed.
CIO considers that preperation for Status Assessment is essentially ready for implementation. Training all personnel to all procedures and waiting for all procedures to be issued is an unnecessary restraint.
If sufficient material is available, then a team should start implementation so that the results of that effort may be evaluated and fine tuned as necessary.
_