ML20024B482

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 790416 Meeting Re Operational Limits Which Should Govern Operator Actions to Secure or Terminate HPI
ML20024B482
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/18/1979
From: Cartin L
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
To: Brazill G, Dunn B, Elliott N
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
References
TASK-01, TASK-02, TASK-07, TASK-1, TASK-2, TASK-7, TASK-GB GPU-2707, NUDOCS 8307090007
Download: ML20024B482 (4)


Text

.a

_ = __

w-

=.

n.rm :_ -. -~ --

~ ^'M * **

dpcu-;orp s.

~ ".~

Tile BABCDCX & WILCOX COMPANY POWER GENERATION GROUP P.4 "l'"

To l

b h%

)

DISTRIBUTION

.g Q

  • g 4gp From sos m.s L. R. CARTIN. PLANT INTEGRATION (2835)

Cust.

File No.

or Ref.

..]

Subj.

Date

.'A MEETING MINUTES ON HPI OPERATION PROCEDURE -

APRIL 18,1979 8':10 a.m.

l

m. i,........

$d

'c-DISTRIBUTION

l

.m.-e

-NE G. J.' BRA'ZILL D. L.'HOWELL':

.. s.

--J-

8. M. DUNN E. W.'SWANSON

-N N. ELLIOTT R. O. VOSEURGH O

R. E. HAM R. W. WIhKS

$G

L A MEETItiG WAS HELD ON APRIL 16TH 'TO DISUCSS THE OPERATIONAL LIMITS WHICE

i ~

SHOULD GOVERN OPERATOR ACTIO!is TO SECURE OR TERMINATE HPI. THIS MEETING r

..v

'.M i.. '..'

W i

AS VIEWED AS THE FIRST. STEP TO EXPAND PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION ON THIS

. f ird.

4 ;;j SUBJECT TO COVER ALL POTENTIAL OPERATI0t:AL MODES AND TO ELIMINATE OR MODIFY

~.: ; :.%

.. ].

THE. IMPOSED TIME /SUBC00LIliG LIMITS.

t

'&..y 3 35

. ~~

~

3

Ly:-

T

- " '1 TABLE 1 PROVIDES A LIST OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BOTH IN THE 'LONG' AND t

d SHORT TERM. THE IDENTIFIED SCHEDULE. IN GENERAL, REFLECTS A COMBINATION f

-OF PRIORTIES AND PROBLEM COMPLEXITY.. ITEMS 1-4 WERE CONSIDERED TO SOME '

l EXTEtiT IN THIS FIRST MEETING,AND A

SUMMARY

OF THE DISCUSSIONS AND/OR CON-

. [j CLUSIONS FOR EACH IS' PROVIDED BELOW. ITEMS 6 & % WHICH RELATE TO LONG TERM j

RECOVERY FROM OPERATIONAL MODES WHICH RESULT IN A SOLID PRIMARY SYSTEM AND

-a.,

,,'. ".G. ;

THERMAL' SHOCK EFFECTS ON THE RV'At:D COLD LEG PIPING DUE TO THE INJECTION OF COLD'HPI WATER WILL'BE DISCUSSED AT A LATER DATt.

,. 3 n

y:T; U*h SOF SUCC00 LING LIMIT & INSTRUMENTATION LIMI'TS

.8 THE ESTABLIS'IMEriT AND MAINTENANCE OF A'50F SUBC00 LING LIMIT PRIOR TO TERMI-8307090007 790418 PDR ADOCK 05000289 P

HOL O M M Y 03'S.o JY I

ons

r

_ : m ' -~ -

  • _ ~' 7-'

q.

__=

.i

.l o

CARTIN TO DISTRIBUTION PAGE TWO a

MEETIliG HINUTES ON HPI OPERATIOfiAL PROCEDURE APRIL 18, 1979

[

U NATI0tl 0F HPI WAS ORIGIriALLY INTE!iDED' TO COVER BOTH THE REQUIRED THERMAL F

MARGIfiS AND AllTICIPATED. IllSTRUMENT ERROR. IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THE 50F J

-H WT" s.

SUBC00LIllG LIMIT SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH P-T CURVES TMft INCORPORATES A 20F i

A

~

L

./

SUCC00 LED l%RGI!! PLUS APPROPRIATE ItiSTRUMENATION ALLOWAliCES WHICH WILL RE-S-

.y t..

D FLECT ACTUAL EXPECTED.DEVIATIO!iS. CONSIDERATIONS CAft THEN BE GIVEN TO THE h

M-

.j ACTUALINSTRUMENTSAPIDREADOUTCAPABILITIESAVAILABLE(E.G.,NARROWRANGE 4

p VSWIDERAtiGEPRESSUREANDCOMPUTERVSINDICATIORSVSSTRIPCHARTRECORDERS).

.d b

]

a 20 MIN TIME LIMIT-IMPACT Ofi OVERC00 LING /DEPRESSURIZATION TRANSIENTS

[h x

THE 20 MINUTE TIME LIMIT PROVIDEC.IS T.:TET.EM E i WAS ORIGINALLY DEVELOP A 0

..M ENSURE THAT THE OPERATOR DOES !!OT BASE HIS DECISION TO TER!!!NATE HPI FLOW cc v.

.6 ON SYSTsl CONDITIO!!S EARLY IN THE TRAfiSIEriT WHICH WOULD NOT INDICATE LONG 21

~

h Gy TERM TRENDS. THIS TIME LIMIT HAS COME UNDER CRITICISM FROM WITHIN B&W AND

/

t.<

FROH SEVERAL CUST0*' IRS SECAUSE, UtiDER CERT'AIN CIRCIESTAfiCES. THIS " WAIT PERIOD" f.$

9

.MAY RESULT IN THE HPI'S PUMPING THE SYSTEM SGLID WITH WATER RELIEF OUT THE J

s

~

~ K CODE SAFETY VALVES.1 D. HOWELL PRESENTS RESULTS, FROM SOME SCOPING STUDIES i',

~ '

IITILIZING THE OFR SIMULATOR FOR NON-LOCA DEPRESSURIZATION EVENTS, WHICH CON-i.'

TF FIRMED THAT WATER RELIEF VIA THE SAFETY VALVE WAS A DISTIliCT POSSIBILITY IF A

(

20 MINUTE WAIT PERIOD'IS MANDATORY. THESE SIMULATIOriS ALSO EXAMINED THE 7

.p-

~

ABILITY OF THE OPERATOR TO CONTROL P&T WHEN THE PRESSURIZER HAS BEEN PUMPED

}.

' fl. 2 SOLID. SEVEP.AL ' ATTEMPTS TO C00LDOWN AfiD DEPRESSURIZE WERE MADE. A!!D IT WAS 7

%.] "

'.' J..[

FOUiD THAT PRESSURE SWINGS IN A SOLID PODE RESULTED IN V'IOLATION OF THE 50F

?-

u

.53 SUBC00 LING LI!!IT AllD FULL DECOMPRESSION LIMITS.

m

M IT WAS TEliTATIVELY CONCLUDED Tl!AT,THE 20 MIfiUTE WAIT PERIOD COULD BE ELIMINATED.

PROVIDED THAT ACTION TO TERMINATE HPI SE TAKEfi ONLY IF A SOLID PRESSURIZER 15 2

6

.-_w=-

w

!T3]3.0_.,7 011GNT.T_f 1

-.m

-...m.

7 - m. -.

-.. ~..... _ _ -

n_

=... _..

.,.,.,..-,,.-~..-

~

W u

CARTIN TO DISTRIBUTION PACE THREE h

MEETING MINUTES ON HPI OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE

-APRIL 18,1979 25 b.,.-

EMINENT (I.E.,PRESSURIZERLEVEL/PRESSUREINCREASING)'. THIS CHANGE WOULD

'l.

p ALLOW THE OPERATOR TO TERMINATE HPI DURING OVERC00 LING EVENTS (N0:1-LOCA)

R

,d AND TO PREVENT STEAM OR WATER RELIEF OUT THE PRES $URIZER CODE SAFETY OR l-%

a-RELIEF VALVES.

R. O. V05 BURGH INDICATED THAT THIS REVISED POSITION WOULD

.a g.

NOT IMPACT THE ACCIDENT ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR CHAPTER 15 EVENTS.

B. M. DUNN

'3-

.:J.

v i -'i WAS ASK.' HOWEVER, TO RE-EVALUATE THIS POSITION TO DETERMINE IF CORE COOLING 5

~

si:

...li

.f;j COULD BE COMPROMISED FOR ANY POTENTIAL LOCA'S (I.E. 50F SUBC00 LING ON 2

yi

.'n.4 RTD'S MAY NOT INDICATE A SOLID SYSTEM DURING A LOCA).

CONFIRMATION OF THIS M

e,o w

d '.'

.. ?

POSITI0ri IS THUS INDEPENDENT UPON COMPLETION CF ECCS'S ' REVIEW.

.s{

.i

'..f ff-w.

.-.,1 Q:s

'*e

.g=.,

y:.

.. -;2.,

n. :.

,:n

.: m

.: : 1

..e

..=;

~ '"Sa'*!

~.
..'-

./

7.:.

.. 9,,

.~

'i* ~.

..~

y

-[ p zm

. ~a._.'..

=

.- 5

.g... ;...

j;.%

_.T = ' :.

'N

.. }: l.

l

. ~.

LRc:rw 3

4 c,c.

y[.

ATTACHMENT J

7..

~

__ m

/-

~~

- ).g

~

q 4

t

~

..ry e'.

e

%f

'.9ed

( "*.

7.. ;

P-

-m

" :.l

.S..i.5

~

O-y I

'g g

.m.

OY b

.N a

L

_ l%

es 01
D 011s '.0 % 5.6 r.v;3

. }

y

~~

,,..g i

,, w 4;;-.

c

.,4.

s.

TABLE 1: REVIEW ITEMS FOR HPI TERMINATION CRITERIA-g 9._

1.

REASSESS REQUIREMEtiT FOR 50F SUBC00 LING LIMIT (BY APRIL 20TH).

. i ec,-

.c

. a r

n.o.

it.

2.

DEFINE INSTRUMENT ERROR IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE SOF SUEC00 LING 8.IMIT e..-

(BYAPRIL20TH)._

Q m

.: M.<

1.

7_

7 3.

DOCUMENT BASIS FOR OR ELIMINATE 20 HI!UTES OPERABILITY TIME PERIOD E'

?
.T Eh T

PRIORTOHPITERMINATION(BYAPRIL20TH)..

- n

.. 5

~ f

-4.

EVALUATE IMPACT OF OPERATING INSTRUCTION ON ALL ANTICIPATED EVENTS Id

.N ir T.,

'.'.g';

(BYAPRIL20TH).

o_

q,

.a t

E 5.

REFINE PROCEDURE TO INCLUDE SELECTIVE TRIPPING AND/0R THROTTLING OF -

R p

.a e.$[

HPI AND USE OF ALL AVAILABLE INSTRUMENTATI'ON (BY APRIL 20TH).

6 G

-W

~

y

.y LONG TERM RECOVERY FROM " SOLID SYSTEM".dPERATION

. k.i 6.

c..

v

??-

.c.:k

.c:

.p.

.. y.

g HPI-THER!%L SHOCK OF RC PIPING AND REACTOR VESSEL'( 1 MONTH).

F=:

-4 7.

r;n

,c: y.;

.. - ~ ~ -

~

p.'.-

.h F s

~

~

t-

~ }-i.fl

.c l,

?

~ ~.

,e

\\

m,<

x

=

h rg

....i

. ~.k g

a

.3

=..w...

g.

u w

s.__

w

- Q

~,

r'

,r.m

..., ** :t s

w

'". tr

~

~.

R.;

~

~

1:-~

i. H3J3..DM-

~

1 olie !o%$ h

=

t

+

4

-