ML20024B281

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info as to Any Similar Events at B&W Plants Previous to Davis-Besse Event Re Loss of Pressurizer Level
ML20024B281
Person / Time
Site: Crane  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/1979
From: Foster J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Taylor J
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
References
TASK-03, TASK-11, TASK-3, TASK-GB GPU-2417, NUDOCS 8307080231
Download: ML20024B281 (2)


Text

[..j,..........._.-.~~.-.~~-.:......

~.

t

(

. /, -~2 & y.Q._

..-.-----_..-h----='..-..'..'..-.(N

- ~......

.... = - -

J

..f s/Q. Hg.,S.

titi:TED 37/.if 3 nuctus s:aut,uc.w cc..e.muen him

T.,.i
rd( j,t ricosen m T[81 '/3 *4

,.2_

...... o

,.. na e wie..

.r e as su se sv~. swis m < osn

~.

-a

c. s:t /** /

g'"

3.. '.

}'

lj Jcausry 31, 1979 bi [ 9 '

8 j3, L

~

p [ f. p, "'"'.'3./

c; e

[

t t

Hr. J. H. Tsylor 3* IJ. Taylt.r

  • nset:Ye'r"of Licensing p

b $3

[

Babecch.ht.J !!11c0 F, 0, &)m 1250 I,ynchburg, R 2/505 7

Dear Sir:

As dieeussed with Mr. Ray T.ukan of your office on Jacuary 31, 197.9, I-I am perfuc slu; su i:avestiption regardi:3 the evaluation of loss of preswri:er Itvel indicatics at tha Davis-Lesse f:cility.,

2.8 4 ftGrt of this invsstigatica. I Ic,quir.i:d 49 to Wh4th.*P rhcra had beed CQ7 31 11Sr e*/ECC3 St P.Ii plants prevluc3 to t'au Davis-54 sac v.Wnt. tir.1.iAen ahlsed th.c ",0% cclicy di:ce. r:st. t.nc.t <!:scu::1:

b

'af auch le's:.stien '.'it".out cotifie:tica of the rer.;cative custe:er(s) inw1ved. 3,td s4>. 4 that see o.:nd ei written recuest. I*artially to Occt'erodMe this polic74 ve have re-scheduled cce ylsit tu yvut I.ycchtu:S fe:ill y f ar Patrus:7 ::,1*m. se t..n nuns i.:.tcten of E

t your cuaten+r(a) af =y in ;uiry ese be au cepligt.<d.

l e

'The.infor:st:ou 1 reque:t to be r.;4e ave.11sh1= is as folleva:

1.

What previouJ erreticaces of lois of pecesurizer 1=941 have f

occurredt 6

-i 2s the asse.of.th. e.involvs4 titili e7 fat. these. eve.nte l

(

C 3.

The facility' yhere the evertt(s) were c:yerivnced.

4.

The dSte9 of neettrrence'.

h 5,

whether the iGC vas infor:.e4 of the event. 'N w

J.

What evalitation of 1.te event ves performed?

l w:

r 4

l l

F i

~-

r

^A...

8307000231 790131 PDR ADOCK 05000289

-l P

.HOL

7 N

e r

- :.n -

g, J."

n

,wI i

'G1

'.L@

l171 I

2

' J2""2 #7 *H8 Iir. J. Ua T27 '#

,4 4

a ti bq cf G0013C4uct t ') ne duriua O'/ 1 A'!* 0 E10E l'33

  • j 11:13 idOTI1.a* *M c'.s tW C W D o gg -* gg.Iuust8 plus6u t

i If you ladVs e.ty qutS L10t:3 or c *:

  • cut 3 i

r f

(u,) fres to c.untact ce 2: Q u y -26c0.

O{5 Ataccre17.

g G 9 %.- :

I Ja::es z. Yt,ater Investipt.ica 2Puci21188-1 4

1 g

g.

l' I

6 I

g g

4 1

E t'

k i

f.

e

('

4 8

1 t

a g

P I

4,'

i t

[

t k

i i

L e

F g

c 9

e i

g 5

g L

e*

(

5 1

O l

t

\\

%l

\\

l e

r e

L.

I I

L'

_