ML20024B186
| ML20024B186 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1977 |
| From: | Goodman D METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | Geoffrey Miller, Seelinger J METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-01, TASK-1, TASK-10, TASK-GB GPU-2278, NUDOCS 8307070247 | |
| Download: ML20024B186 (4) | |
Text
-
d V lt h b-I $
4 METP.OPOI.lTAN EDISON CO M P A N Y G u,,, c...,,,s og...., c.,,,,,,,
\\.
U: lit II TPAI!;I!;G PROGRESS Leenia T!!! Tiuclear Station s,,g I:iddletown, PA Dm 1:ay 2,1977
.To G.P. !! ILLER J.L. SEELI!;;ER r
L.
The second Unit II Progress Examination was given to Unit II lipensing candidates on April 13 and 14. A sumary of the results and comparisons with the results of the first Progress Exam, OJT Progran and recent Unit I Requal Exas are shown in Attachr'. ant I.
I am concerned about the progress, or lack of it, of some of these employees.
I 1.
W.T. Brann - He has not yet passed an exas and consistently scores near tha botton. He is also behind on his GJT. *, e had a mutual problems session with hin after the first Progress Exan, and although he did 2
better on the se'cond Progress Exam he still failed.
?.+
2.
J.J. Ch.:astyk - He barely passed his Unit I Requal Exan (81.47. with 80%
7
(
required.), failed both Progress Exa.s a.d is behind on his OJT. His second Progress Exam score was the ic.est of the group. I don't know how we can apply for a cross license for him and state that he's
" satisfactorily" completed the Unit II Training Program, lie would be I-hardpressed to docucent it since he hasn't econstrated sufficient knowledge to pass any Unit II exam!
3.
0.A. l:ee. ann - I an extrc=ely concerned about him! He was at:ong the bottom three on both progress tests'. He has a stro :g background, no Unit I responsibilities, yet he's even behind on his OJT. Again, how can we docu ent to the fLRC that he's " satisfactorily" co.3pleted our Unit II Training Program?
4. J.R. Floyd - He barely passed his Unit I Requal Exam (81.4% with 80%
required) and failed both Unit II Progress Exa s.
I'm not concerned about his ability to pass the Unit II Crcss Licensing Exam. I am con-cerned about docu.enting the fact that he's " satisfactorily" completed the Unit II Training Program.
5.
R.R. Bocher - He did well on his first Unit II Progress Exam (80~.) but poorly on the second (62~.). What cor.cerr.s t'e is that the second exam was casier than the first. He is doing well in his OJT.
Additional testing doesn't seem to be the ansuar. The Shift fupervisors, Shift Foremen, and CR0's are each doing i:cIl as a smup; Chuastyk, ?!cumnn, and
(
Uest are not. This indicates that these three ren (3 different shif ts) have an attitude problem that is not cort.on with others in t'uir classification. In other n:ords, the problen is with these individaals, not the training program.
INTER-CFFICE f.iE?.*CR *J.TJ?.*
8307070247 770502 PDR ADOCK 05000289 HOL 1- -
11G 3i 0 7 3 c..:
nGl7.. g s9. _ ;.
- = --
t y,
i
r
\\,s I would re.' vest that you talk with Jin Flejd and 1. press on him the inportance of his people doin) cell in the Training Progecn. 1:e hve talled to him several tices, but we don't have the jurisdiction to dt 2nd i.Sprovc ent. People also tend to feel that tie're crying " wolf" when the Trcining Depar** ment says that people are duing poorly in training.
h 2^l Y[
yb%JM o
s Donald A. Gooitan Group Su;ervisor-Technical Training DAG:Lnr Attachment cc:
L.L. Lawyer L.
Tsaggaris R.W. Zecteun 2
e
(
l L
k i
(
~
~
~
1 1 s if 0 7 5' O.
em A
+mRs[Tb h i
=-
n'
+
AiiACH;t-sf 1 Ulit_T II TPAf:iitlG F
U:!!I I RE-1 U:11T 2 PF.0-U:ll i 2 P.>.0-U:o1i 2 OJf
\\.!
QUAL EXTJi CRESS EXA!! E GRESS EyA:1 #
iliuAt
~Eu~11:ic pat 1 (00'. Reg.)
2 (703 Req.)
3 (7C:1 P.cq.)
PR00RESS G9ESS AS OF P
GIVE*i 3/2/77 GI"E!! 2/16/77 CIVEfi 4/13/77 t./29/75 - %
L-C.D. ADA::S ft/A 93 94.3 29 59 c
- .L. BEERS 93.7 ES 91.5 32 59
't.R. 800HER
!!/A 80 62 40 59
!!.T. EPit:1 ft/A 38 63.6 42 59 J.J. Cil'!ASTYK
- 81.5 69.4
'46.7 37
"' 59 -
I 1.5. CCLC*Att f!/A ft/A 83.4 27 22
!!.T. CO lA'.:AY ft/A 71.8 80.8 38 59 I-J.R. CC:;CDd1 fl/A
!!/A 84.1 37 22
!!.R. dESH 81.4 83.6 78.5 32 59 C.C. FAUST
!!/A
!!/A 85.6 27 22 JR 81.4 60.9 63.9
!!/A
!!/A i. FLOYD E.R. FREDERICK 76 87.6 55 59 C.L. GUT!!RIE 79.6 79.6 82.8 24 59 F
H.tl. H/JIT! Mil
'l/A fi/A 86.2 17 22 i
G.R. HITZ 95.2
!!/A f;/A ft/A N/A J.R. H0YT ft/A 79.9 76.2 42 59 R.S. HUTCHIS0?1 ft/A
'71 84.7 44 59 T.F. ILLJES
!!/A 72.2 41 59 i.
P.f!. LY00?!
ft/A f!/A f:/A 17 22 i
_ t ti.J. ftARSHALL ft/A fl/A
!!/A
!!/A
!!/A B.A. f:EHLER' 88.5 80.8 77.5 31 59 A.tl. f:!LLER ft/A 96 97.1 55 59 l
D.A. f1EU:1Arll1 fl/A 45.4 52.8 21 i
59
(. ROSS 92.7 74 83.4 41
. 59 F.J. SC!!EllMil?!
!!/A 75.4 79.4 r.3 59 S.G. S!!ITtt 93 65 75.9 27 59 e-j{G. 7 0 6. G 1163l0 7 3 S,i
~
^~
.~
i l
L
-2' ti!!! r t i T P.' i.h *;G
~
U;n T I fa-U:llI 2 PF.0-UtilT 2 P?0-U:11 T 2 0.if 3
QUAL Ey.:1!
,GRESS EXA:t !
G".ESS EXA:i f TCiWL P.ttJi?.:0 PP..
(89:5 P.:q.)
2 (10; Req.)
3 (701 Req.)
P200RE55 CRESS AS OF GIVEi! 3/2/77 GIVEf! 2/16/77 GIVEri 4/13/77 4/29/75 G.E. Tlia:050:1 rt/A T /A '
f/A 12 22 g C.E. l!EST 45 73.3 46 59 L.O.1: RIG!!T 83.2 89.4 33 59 L^
U.H. ZEUE 91.6 76.6 89.1 40 59 a
e d>
e e
e a
a a
e e
M.
e e
l e
e r
l k
ye
-~.. aebe d em 5 m p
gg e
. ~ %
i
_.