ML20024B167

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Deposition of Eg Ward on 790828.Pp 42-43
ML20024B167
Person / Time
Site: Crane  
Issue date: 08/28/1979
From: Ward E
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
To:
References
TASK-*, TASK-GB GPU-6050, NUDOCS 8307070174
Download: ML20024B167 (3)


Text

e.

5.s (7 pct 60f0 I

g Designations from the President's Commission Deposition

'of Edwin G.

Ward, dated August 28, 1979:

I 42:14 - 43:2 i

l i

[

i s.

1 t

8307070174 790828 PDR ADOCK 05000289 T

HOL

.(

s e

c i

l t

- - - =

,.T '* O ' -

I a

s-

_,c

_.a.._

4,r;,__,. _

c

.;w,,,,

_]

x, 6,,

s.

P6( /.eOS~O l

Ward

}

Q So at that time is it fair to say no t

o 3

decision had been made by GPU that this facility 4

would be used for operator training?

5 A

I am sure they had not given that serious 6

consideration at this stage of the game.

7 Q

But would it be fair to say in your view

[

8 that Burns & Roe was fully cognizant of the fact that i:

for 9

the simulator was being designed and constructe d I

10 a&W for the purpose of training operators?

l 11 A

I believe that they were.

l 12 Q

And would the sane thing apply to GPU?

13 A

I believe so.

,l :

i ;

/ 14 Q

In your view, what is th e primary benefit f

15 of having a simulator of'this type?

.-9 16 A

To allow an operator an opportunity to gain 17 firsthand experience at a control console without 18 doing the things.

In other words, it would allow 1

transients and other unusual 19 him to experience 20 maneuvers which he must have ready access to, without on-21 running the risk of doing this in an actual power

- c 22 plant.

of simulator v.

23 It is very similar to the use 24 training in the aircraft industry, and I believe is J

k used quite extensively in nuclear power plant 25

. also

.I 6

SENJAMIN R EPORTING SERVICE Jaq

[,'

T h "N_'?"

8P8F g.gre w.

_3; a.w.

..Ac....

._J : %..... ; u.. ; a..~.L............,:

l-4.

o -

\\

Ward 43 2

work as'well, m

3 Q

30 would you say that the mero time that 4

the operator would use the facility for training, the 5

better?

6 A

I suppose there is some optimum amount of time.

7 I'm not sure I would say the more the better.

There 8

is some optimum amount of time that would be desirable.

9 Q

sut I take it that B&W did envision some 10 regular patterned use of the facility by operators 7 b

A That is correct.

12

'Q Was there discussi'on within B&W or with 13 GPU on locating the simulator, say, at TMI 27 14 A

I am not aware of any discussion regarding 2) 15 locating it at TMI 16 Q

Do you think that that idea might be a 17 good onc from the standpoint of assuring that there 18 is an adequate and regular training program?

19 A

If I were to indic' ate it would be a good idea 20 to have a simulator at TMI 2,

I would also have to 21 say at each and every nuclear plant installation.

22 I frankly have not determined i;. my own mind whether 23 that is the appropriate way to go or whether instead 24 to have training centers.

5 o

My belief right now is, without a lot of thought, S ENJAMIN R EPO RTIN G SERVICE

_