ML20024B016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Comments on Preliminary Bid Request for Nuclear Power Plant Issued by Met Ed,Covering Proposal to Build in PA
ML20024B016
Person / Time
Site: Crane  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/08/1966
From: Heller F
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
To: Favret L
BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
References
TASK-*, TASK-GB GPU-0175, GPU-175, NUDOCS 8307020021
Download: ML20024B016 (4)


Text

.

s.

~,,

T O.

Gray New York Sales r.E CEP/E9 D.&'d.!!.Y.("3P.

L. II. FAVRET NUCLEl.R PROPOSITION

'ELi."ZO H1 2: 9 50 3?a313 TON y p. - 3.-n q., pg dbb b

2.

F. C. HELLER PHILA. DISTRICT SALES OFFICE

- - - - -. g g;

r METSCPOLITAN EDISON COMPMir 4

READIl!G, PL'NSYLVANIA A4-7 PEELII'INARY BID REQUEST NUCLEAR PLANT FEBRUARY 8, 1966 You have roceived copics of the Preliminary Bid Request l'ucion: Power Plant issued by Metropolitan' Edi::on Co., Reading, Pa. covoring the plant they propose to build in the Reading area.

Based on a discussion with George F. Biernan, a nombor of the GPU Nuclear Stocring Committee, wo have the following comments tn the Eid Roquest:

1.1 P1nnt C m bilitv-The range of 600-750 101 is intended to give Eidders floxibility in solocting their cos.t economical size.

The naximun is 750 101 not olectrical capability, since this o is all that can be handlod by the transmission system..Any capacity in excess of this anount would actually bo penalized by the additional cost of the transmission equipmont.

1 3 Dasien a constructies ob3cetive_s_-You will note that this plant

. is to be for operation on ecoling towers and presumably is the first nuclear plant so designed.

Any cocments vo may

$esMY have with regard to the effect of the cooling tower plumo on NR the gaseous wasto disposal from the plant would bo most 35

'nelpful.

<g g

1.4.1.S_clection of Architect ~?ntincers - Gilbert Associates, Inc.

gg will be the Cuners Engineers and as such vill not be available u sa either for assistanco in proparation of proposals, or in g4 carrying out any work aftor the award of contract for the gg account of the contractors.

u n.a.

11.2 Contractors' Rosnonsibility - Uo will be expected to be complotel financially rosponsible for mooting all AEC and other Government roquirements i= posed prior to plant acceptanco.

This of revisionsinthoAECDesignCriterda.xpense,otc. duo,to course, ncans additional licensing e

Ir N Wo win also be expected Mt assuma financial responsibility for the cost of changes 4t. Exh' For 10 a Lhe balance of plant structure and equipsont, as a result-rm,,.,,

J changes or additions in the design concept, functional arles Shapiro CSR require =ent, and ongineering criteria provided by us if_such yle Reporting Inc.

changes prove necessary in order to assure compatibility dii[p(g,J vith equip =ent to be supplied by us or to coot AEC or other Governmentgkoqu.iroments, imposed prior to plant acceptance.

say y I u lcs sml m J su j sy-au f*d Un12sa

l MG.W dbf N' 2~"i m df rn mq m.ey

<. c..~

?;).i-I:R. L. M. FAVRET KUCLEAR P110 POSITION BAF5dTON k3. ?. C. HELLER PIIILA. DISTRICT SALES OFFICE IGT30PCLILW 3DISCH CO:IP/JE, RCA DING, PA.

A4-7

?RELIMINARY SID REQUEST NUCLEAR PLtdiT F E 5!JiY Os 1966

~2-1.4.3 f.1.t. $_ Nue)oor Isinnd UT.I. ).- L1 connection with the Nuclear I: land concept which also includoc a netching turbino-fren Valch the, Engincors, Gilbert Ascociatos, tho foundations for the turbine,sonerator. piping cnd interconnecting electricc1 cire.uits 1.4.4 Ot. ;&?_319.Lanr Recensibuity UT.L b Under this citernate to responsiblo for the decign for itens which effect thon license ability of the nuclear,pertion of tha work.

1 5 E'.to Informtion - Pickard & Lovo, Assoc. Nuclear Consultants for our use in evaluating tho sito.have prepared a detailed s

~

A:: you Ic.ov, wo have already nado a prolininary sito inspection and safety report covoral conth: ago.

3.2 their intcntion that thoso charEen be ccda for fuel c 33 will-havo a fuel cost of 17 conts por million BTU at

-bar.

5.1 INelenr Aten":

is a statencut with rogcrd to percent plant availability wit a loss of individual components and guarantoca as noted in Sect. ion 4.0.

Tr'c do not have this Soction, ac yet, hovover, Tablo I gives a prolininary outlino of the type of information required.

$.1.8 M cter Plant and Aux 111arv Systens aro required to provida linited access for nnintenanco of-Under this Scoti i

en:;incoring safo l

power oporation. guards within the contain=ent during full-l

?

l 1

l-l t

Uo1257 L

L

i j

EN! k].TMTjkj iMS'

h Mc Y

IM@'"

L. ::. FAVRET NUCLEAR PROPOSITION BARBERTON dbdh fly 5 7 '

6j F. C. HELLER PHILA. DISTRICT SALES OFFICE RETROPCLIT!di EDISON COMPANY READING, PA.

A4-7 PIELIMIL'ARY 3ID RL' QUEST NUCLEAR PLANT FEBRUARY 5.1.9 Rndi. etive 1.hsto Treatment nnd Disposal - It is noted hero that the treatment systo= nust havo sufficient capacity to handle vaste which would rosult if one percont of the fuel rods woro loating.

Gilbert Associatos feel that this number is tco high and vill result in excess tankage and storage c c.pacity.

If we have any thoughts on a more realistic number uo should bo prepared to discuss it.

In connection with the limits for liquid vaste disposal, they are thinking of reducing them below the present caximum allow-able li=its cf'the sa=e, paragraph vhoroin they state "Environmentalsom what on tho Exposure duo to Plant Affluent Shall Not Exceed One-Tenth of the Permissible Values under the Operating License and Applicable Regulations."

IIe understand that it will be much nore difficult to moet these = ore stringement requireccats with a BUR than a PWR.

5.1.1 _ Cort-intent

- This paragraph contains several require =cnts with regard to the method of testing required.

Ne understand that on so=o previous designs, such as Dresdon yl, the testing required for the containuent approximately twice the tino required after refueling, was to do the actual refueling.

Taay are anxious to explore the economic advantages of double containnont with the thought in mind that this may provide centinuous testing which would expedito the return to full pouer operation after a refueling cycle.

Any thoughts vo nay have on this iton would be of groat interest to the customer.

Copies of the preliminary bid request has been issued to three biddors (Babcock & Wilcox, Westinghouse and General Electric) and each has boon asked to comment on it in detail with a viou to elitinating all questionable items prior. to request for formal bids on April 1.

We have boon asked to noet uith the Nuclear Stoering

=

Cccaittee, whose na=os are being submittod separately by C. T.

S:dith's =eco of February 4 at o:30 en Thursday, February 24,.at Motropolitan Edison Co. 's o,ffice in Reading, Pa.

a

1*

L. M. FAVRET NUCLEAR PROPOSITION BARBERTON

?f

]."' " '

.dy,.yI'V2%

pmq y F. C. HELLER PHILA. DISTRICT SALES OFFICE zj METRCp0LITAN EDISON CO. READING. PA.

A-4-7 PRELIMINARY BID REQUEST NUCLEAR PLANT FEBRUARY 8, 1966

_4-In order to save time, we have already made reservations for eight peoplo at the Reading Motor Inn, the evening.of Wednesday, February 23, and lunchoon reservations for the entire group on Thursday, c

on the assumption that the meeting vill last all day.

This is intended to be a wide open meeting during which we vill be given every opportunity to display our nuclear know-hov.

Pickard & Lowe and GPU's legal counsel, G.. Fox Trowbridge, will be particularly interested in our experience and know-how of the licensing phase of the project.

All others vill be interested in the ability of our Company as an and construct, including start-up and testingorganization to engineer, fabricate, a plant of this magnitude by the concercial operation date the,y have specified.

In line with this nanpower, nuclear,know-hov and overall organization.we have been advised We have been advised repeatedly that they are most nnxious to have at least three or four contractors in the nuclear field and they expset to give us every possible opportunity to put our best foot forward.

Unofficially the same sentiments have been expressed by Gilbert Associates, Inc., the Consulting Engineers.

They do not expect to devote much time to the subject of fuel costs.

However a short discussion of the type of fuel contract we propose for,the Carolina Power & Light Co. job would be most helpful.

At the moment they appear to be interested in leasing the fuel rather than outright ownership.

FCH:M3L i

cc-?dGehr, NYSales l

Dr. J. Coughlin, Nuclear Specialist, Barb.

G. Gray NYSales J.W.Landis, Washington Operations S.T.Mackenzie, Vice-Pres. Natl Sales, Barb.

J.G. Martin, Gen. Mgr. Natl Sales, Barb.

D.W.Montgo=ery, Lynchburg, Va.

l UO1259 l

l u