ML20024B011
| ML20024B011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/23/1966 |
| From: | Favret L, Joan Olmstead BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| To: | BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-*, TASK-GB GPU-0170, GPU-170, NUDOCS 8307020008 | |
| Download: ML20024B011 (3) | |
Text
s,,'
i
.r ' '
R.k w
THE D/.BC0CK & WILCOX COMPANY G01LCR DIVISION
- 8. 4 i f g
Udh,]u id;,-[y]ij grg 9.f j
To l
DISTRIBUTION IS33 fM 25 pn 1 3g 9U q c.,
Udl. p {!"'M.q v.hI,y h,"
p.Q a
L. M.
FAVRET - NUCLEAR P0h'ER PLANT PROPOSITION eos 663-3 Cust.
File No.
or Ref.
METROPOLITAN EDISON A4-7 Subj.
Date UE&C'- B&W MIETING MAY 20, 1966 MAY 23, 1966 l in., ieu.e to u.cr one cu.twr em me buct mir.
A meeting was held in UI&C Philadelphia offices on May 20, 1966 to review Purchaser final specifications and their influence on engineering-estimating-bidding being done by UE&C (and J&M).
The following attended:
B&W UE&C
.1&M L. M. Favret W. Boland J. H. Crowley F. C. Heller F. Cook H. Vann J. B. Olmstead W.
Fonner G.
S. White G. A. Heckscher
'A review of the specifications showed that their has been negligible lost motion in the proposition work being done for us by UE&C-J&M.
A rough breakdown of the specification with UE&C comments follow:
1.2 Schedule - appears readow ule 13 Ob.Jectives - Purchaser wants an Indian Point 2 containment 1.4 Scope - financial responsibility for changes is burden to be faced by Company and to be defined in our Terms and Conditions.
Constiuction management for entire plant (not Nuclear Island alone) is a UE&C condition for bidding.
15 Site - hypothetical site will be basis of bid dependent t_
on timing of site celection (i.e. an announcement.of site tomorrow would permit review and bid revision, while a selection two weeks before bid would not permit complete evaluation of construction and transport costs).
2.2 Bid Alternates - permit turnkey bids C,-Po Uo124o
/. -
l M Exh. For ID l70 i m mll,l ;j I l
l fla;ywa f
nu c2,_ r..
ar[es Shiro CSRDll[d/
1 -
l * " f "l " l ffl' p
Doyle Reportinginc, pi 8d p
- T 8307020008 660523
-a
-~
r-r q
rw
PDR ADOCK 05000289 1
r P
[i P
HDL s
-. ~ _
- i..
f '
- .;J v -
w..r.n:h d. ~gs.-
t 30 Evaluations - that working capital charges exceed fixed rate charge rates was noted as unusual.
4.0. Scope - Mr. - Heller had opportunity to visit Purchaser,
t prior.to this meeting cnd determine that:
(1)
Supply by B&W of equipment integral to our auxiliary' systems and safety equipment would be acceptable despite minor terminology and scope definition differences given in the specification.
instruments and control valves in our systems shouldFor example,,
~l-be in our scope, including feedwater control.
7.0 Terr-s and Conditions - the Proposal must define timing of Furchaser approval of design work and establish-scheduling. responsibility.
Proposition Schedule
..(1)
J&M drawings are done except for minor revision and will be complete by the end of this week.
(2)
J&M proposition written material'will be complete
~
,by mid June.
(3)
UE&C estimate will be complete by June 21 (except for minor adjustments necessary after B&W review).
~
~
(4)
The proposal draft will be complete by mid July 9
(B&W responsibility).
Job Schedule T
(1)
UE&C emphasized that their bid would be contingent
~
on B&W meeting the enginebring schedule.
are not meeting schedule _and are facing ec(onomic Competitors losses due to use of labor overtime to overcome late supply of engineering input.)
B&W promised UE&C an engineering PERT schedule for use in the preparation of the UE&C bid to us.'
i
~
(2)
Delivery or field assembly of the reactor vessel on schedule is the responsibility of B&W.
Sales Presentation i
UE&C will furnish B&W samples of:
l l
' organization charts
.i personn.el resumes
.h schedules experience and qualification descriptions i
't t
U 1241 O
s g
~
Y..;.
y
-~
..f la p
p..y
- - - - - p -- -
.ri i-o.
mi
+ - - - - - -
t.**i.;h'g,f~".':m c I Ti-]-
?. l4 z,
These are to be reviewed by B&*1 and then UE&C will rework them into a form suitable for integrated sales effort that is to be under complete control and guidance of Bfdl Sales.
In other words, UE&C offered way B&W requests.
to supply sales assistance any ~
Exceptions to Specifications UE&C will draft a set of exceptions and clarifications to.
the bidding document for B&W use in proposa(l preparation. including technical clarifications)
Responsibility UE&C was frank and direct in stating that in the event of contract:
'(1)
B&W must supply engineering data on' time and deliver components on schedule.
(2)
Construction management for the ENTIRE PLANT will be a condition of the UE&C bid.
(3)
Purchasers engineering (by Gilbert) approval must be on schedule.
(4)
UE&C can work in accord with Gilbert as they know
'+
and respect each other.
(5)
Availability of labor :::ay be a problem and thus it is impossible to costs with accuracy. predict escalation of labor IJG
/. B. Olmstead d
J JBO:mr cc:
R. K. Behr J. Coughlin D. K. Davies N. S. Embrey F. C. Heller D. E. Heyburn A. H. Lazar J. H. MacMillan D, W. Montgomery
'W. H. Rowand 3
G. S. White D. R. Wilson UGI242 g
..._g. g._...... _
.g y.__.___._._
.7,
.