ML20024A938
| ML20024A938 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1967 |
| From: | JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-*, TASK-GB GPU-0195, GPU-195, NUDOCS 8307010206 | |
| Download: ML20024A938 (3) | |
Text
]
t
. ;,, 4.
.e v_.
.__._o'.....-
e o
4 - (.
\\
l.
t.4,'
....tj 1
...,w.....
3
Subject:
Not2s 0
=coting with L*.?* representatives recarding Jocesy Co=t:- 1 Muc1 car Plant.
Data:
naeting hclf -shruary 1,
'.DC7 T.aca:
Ocard noon, Jersey Central, "orristown General v._i e.
n>>
'~
...f
- ~ '
"'hosc present for 3LW:
-L.
1*.
7 vra'., G. Cray, J. Cimstead.
~
~
For Jersey Cantral Power & Licht:
J. E. Logan, G. E. Rittcr.
D. R. Roos, J. K. Pic'.=rd.
Sacueround
- -~
20'3 in a letter'dcted January 4,1337 to ':r. Neidig of
':st-Id agraad to supply a second nuclear steam supply
~
systa= essentially identical to that scquired by Set-Od for Three Mile Isla:d.
Also, OEW ngraad that Uet-Ed could ass,ign.this offar to Jersey Ce ral.
Jersey Cqntral prior to this meeting d in accordance with the termination date stated in the January 4 letter had givan ShW verbal co=mitmast.to purchase this USSS on the understanding that it was identical to the NSSS to be supplied Uet-2d.
The purpose of this seating vias, t.t aref ore, to offer ESW an opportunity to describe tho'NSSS to ba supplied Jersey Central and to identify differeness, if any, in the equipmen, and terms and conditions batraen -the Het-2d and Jersey Central offers.
S.' N 'oresentation
.i'_T shcred a saries of slidas co ::ining a very ganar:1 c'accription of the XESS of f ared.
Among othars the following fattures ware described:
1.
The NSSS will produca 35 7 suparheated sta =
with an Opt,in = throtti: 'rorsura of about 003 esig.
(,.eo.
BeM. Exh. For ID I q s
...4
,u
,,. o.
, c.
t u : s.< c = c
- 12.- zu.C af t'a tus::==
- m.. 1.,_...u.
. _,......_i Doyle Reporting Inc. gg($.........
v.t.
a._.
o.......
Charles Shapiro CSR Q'
9307010206 670201 PDR ADOCK 05000299 A
E
c3
.. - c,..
(i t
u 2-
%r. Eavect noted that the guarantacd output of the i*STS was to bc 55 1:ss than its maximum capability.
This difforcaca totwoon the guarcateed and =axi=um outputs was sciccted to jibe with the difference b:0 ween the guarantcod and maximum outputs custocarily offered by tha turbino suppliers.
3.
While DOW was anxious to place orders soon for the pressure vossal and sten = csnerators materials it recognized that wcrh on tha Jarsey Contral unit would not begin until September 1967.
'. ~ s _;
,4.
Responding to'questi'oEs'on load following ccp' ability 30W representativos noted that their reactor as compared to a Westinghouse reactor contained appre cichly = ora reactivity in control rods and therefore
_, had grotter load _following capabilities through use of control rods alona.
69 control rods would be
~
supplied which could easily follow rs=p changes up or down; over the life of the core, of 105 par minute.
It was further noted that some up ramps might be limited to 905 of capacity because of the possibility of overshooting.
This limitation, however, anut under study and might be alleviated with the automatic' equipment that SaW included in its offer.
Discussi*on of En7 Offer '
30W submitted a brief scope document, Proposal A5-91, dated' January 26, 19G7.
Jersey Central representatives noted that this was an inadequate description of the equipment, and terms and-conditions offered and requested.a detailed prop osal..,EEW, agreed to submit this on either February 17 or 20.
In discussing the BLW offer Jersey Central representatives c
noted that no detailed description of the equipment or 1 terms and conditions:had bean received and that Jersey Central understood it had been offered and had accepted identical' equipment, scrvices and tares and conditions which
,.e had been accepted by %et-Cd.-
Mr. Favrct agreed that this
{?I was the case and,noted that so=a o( the terms end conditions
- had not yet been negotiated but that as they were settled they would apply.to both %at-Ed-and Jersey Central.
He did note,.however, that t Jersey Central' site had-not been
~
solacted and that sono'diffarenec batwacn the Mat-d and-J rcay Cantral offcr would to dictated by'sita ccnditions.
20 alto noted th I tha Jerscy unit followed the Ect-2d
];
~
unit;by two years and tha
'it was reasonable for Sir to
(
P*
B B
e 9 m
i w
y g
1 t
~,% -
3-
/
l ash for prtco esca.lation for a trio year period to cover
{-
cost increases for this interval.
Cr. Favrot = Iso pointed out that.12C had changed its critoria rugarding core salting following the maximum cr dible accidc=t such that =0; no ccre r.elting was permitted whereas prior to Ea.-ter.:cer 100G ACC had allowed
ccco significant =elting".
(I nesu=cd that Favret's cc== cut c= this subject ref errsd to the item in the January
( letter cf 0300,000 fcr sdditional fuel handling and safe-gu:rds ecr 4...ct.)
..s. +,3
..m..
B".W a~ reed t. h.a.tit would.
~ ~ " *
~
.u w'...
Contral idan.tical. to tho..s.ubmit fuel proposals to Jersey se offeied Est-Id except that the
?- ; :.
,7 -
<-core offer wou.ld not contain a provision for SLt to supply the uranium for Cora II at a fi::ed price.
Tsen asked if JC' and ::et-2d could interchange fuel 217 agreed IJ :
that.it would use its best efforts to acco==odate any
~ ~ ~
reasonable scheme.
Eocaver, F4W notad that it may have a schaduling proble= in fral fabrict. tion if both the '.*at-3d and Jersey Contral units were refueled ct the same time and thus s=ggasted th:: an effort be made to refuel these enits on r % est schadu'es.
......c..
Original r.otes da.ted February' 1, '1967.
,-,9g7 A
~.
. u,..,
3.
.--a.c-c Ccpics to:.j C. J.
.., c,,,
w G. I~. T.rowbridgd - G. Charnoff
. ~. -
~..
w
'