ML20023C362

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Second Interim Significant Const Deficiency Rept Scd 71 Re Failure to Properly Review Condition Identification & Work Authorization for Reportability.Initially Reported on 830211.Forms Being Reviewed.Final Rept Expected by 830815
ML20023C362
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/11/1983
From: Maurin L
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Jay Collins
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, SCD-71, W3I83-0161, W3I83-161, NUDOCS 8305170265
Download: ML20023C362 (2)


Text

,O i

P O W E R & L I G H T! P O BOX 6008

  • NEW ORLEANS. LOUISIANA 70174 142 DELARONDE STREET
  • (504) 366-2345 i

YS A L. V. MAURIN Voce President Nuclear Operatens May 11, 1983 W3183-0161 Q-3-A35.07.71 Mr. John T. Collins

[h h h~~ }h; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[

Regional Administrator, Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 i L/

0 t il Arlington, Texas 76012 Ih,'

K ! ' N..

I

SUBJECT:

Waterford SES Unit humber 3 Docket Number 50-382 Significant Construction Deficiency Report No. 71

" Inadequate Review of CIWAs for Reportability" Second Interim Report

Reference:

LP&L letter W3I83-0084 dated March 15, 1983

Dear Mr. Collins:

SCD 71 as reported to the NRC on February 11, 1983, described a failure to properly review Condition Identification and Work Authorization (CIWA) forms for reportability.

To correct this condition, the Quality Assurance (QA) group has been assigned the responsibility of performing an initial screening of CIWAs (ongoing and historical) and forwarding those which could be reportable to the Onsite Licensing section for the final report-ability determination.

It has been determined that approximately 9550 historical CIWAs will require screening by QA.

Thus far, 6221 have been screened and 90 have been trans-mitted to Onsite Licensing for the reportability determination.

Of the 90 historical CIWAs reviewed by Onsite Licensing, 81 were determined to be not reportable, 5 were previously reported as SCDs, and 4 are still being eval-uated.

Approximately 150 ongoing CIWAs are being screened by QA daily. To date, 4813 ongoing CIWAs have been screened and 115 have been transmitted to Onsite Licensing for the reportability determination. Of the 115 ongoing CIWAs reviewed by Onsite Licensing, 107 were determined to be not reportable, 2 were reportable as SCDs (72, & 77), I as a PRD (115), and 5 are still under evaluation.

s

/(/

8305170265 830511 PDR ADOCK 05000382 S

PDR_

f 9E I

Mr. John T. Collins Page 2

]

CIWAs which are being generated daily are being screened and reviewed in accordance_with approved procedures. Per discussion with C. Oberg of your staff, historical CIWAs which are determined to be reportable will require i

a thirty day written report.but will not require the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> notification.

At present, it is estimated that the review of historical CIWAs will be completed by late July. ~A final report will therefore be submitted by August j

15, 1983.

Ver truly yours,

}

L. V. Maurin LVM/ MAL /cmk cc:

1) Director 3)

Mr. E. L. Blake 1

Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Washington, D. C.

20555 i

i j

2) Director 4)

Mr. W. M. Stevenson Office of Management Information and Program Control U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 l