ML20023B571

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program Insp Rept 99900323/83-01 on 830222-25. Noncompliance Noted:Records for All Lead Auditors Not Updated annually,10CFR21 & Procedures Not Posted & Testing for Brand-Rex Control Cables Not Performed
ML20023B571
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/07/1983
From: Phillips H, Alexandra Smith
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20023B553 List:
References
REF-QA-99900323 NUDOCS 8305050192
Download: ML20023B571 (18)


Text

_ - - _

ORGANIZATION: CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION NO.:

99903323/83-01 DATE(S) 2/22-25/83 ON-SITE HOURS:

58 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:

Conax Corporation ATTN: Mr. J. Adams President 2300 Walden Avenue Buffalo, New York 14225 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. R. L. Duroure, Manager of Quality Assurance TELEPHONE NUMBER:

(716)~684-4500 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:

Containment electrical penetrations and environmental qualification testing services.

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: Manufacture of electrical penetrations, electric conductor seal assemblies, adapter modules for other manufacturers' penetra-tions, heat sensing probes, and specialized cabling for nuclear power plants-Also provides environmental test facilities capable of loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) testing Class 1E equipment. Approximately 45% of the corporate activity is devoted to nuclear product manufacture and testing.

  1. 7//J ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:

o Alva L. Smith, Equipment Qualification Section Date (EQS)

OTHER INSPECTOR (S):

J. Hamilton, Reactive and Component Program Section E. Minor, Sandia National Laboratories APPROVED BY:

4

% '//'3 H. S. Fhillips, Chief, EQS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:

A.

BASES:

10 CFR Part 21 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.

B.

SCOPE: This inspection consisted of:

(1) a review of the 18 criteria or 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B described in the Conax Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual; (2) verification that the applicable criteria of the QA program had been implemented in compliance with the approved Conax manual; and (3) 10 CFR Part 21 inspection.

PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY:

DESIGNATED ORIGINAL o

en M ed.

Cortt#ied B7 lll1d &

8305050192 830413 PDR GA999 EMVCONAX 99900323 PDR

ORGANIZATION: CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION N0.:

99900323/83-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 2 of 7 A..

VIOLATIONS:

Contrary to Section 21.21 of 10 CFR Part 21, the Conax implementing procedure did not provide for the evaluation of deviations or a method to cause their evaluation by the licensee or purchaser.

B.

NONCONFORMANCES:

1.

Contrary to the requirements of Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 5.2 of the Conax Quality Assurance Instruction 18.1, records for all lead auditors had not been updated annually.

2.

Contrary to the requirements of Criterion V of Appendix B to Assurance Manual (NQAM) graph 18.1.5(a) of the Conax Nuclear Quality 10 CFR Part 50 and para

, written reports outlining corrective action to resolve noncompliances identified in the Conax internal audit report of June 10, 1982, and the reaudit report of August 10, 1982, were not submitted to the quality assurance manager within the required time period.

3.

Contrary to the requirements of Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 1.5.4 of the Conax NQAM, copies of Federal Regulation 10 CFR Part 21 and procedures were not posted within the company premises.

4.

Contrary to the requirements of Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, requirements contained in IPS-800 " Design Qualification Test Plan for Control and Instrumentation Cables for the Brand-Rex Company," and requirements contained in paragraphs 11.1.2 and 11.1.4(b) of the Conax NQAM, testing for the Brand-Rex control cables was not performed using a test procedure that had been revised and approved in accordance with established procedures.

C.

UNRESOLVED ITEMS:

None D.

STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:

1.

(0 pen) Violation (82-01): Conax Corporation failed to specify that the provisions of 10 CFR Part 21 applied in a procurement document issued for irradiation services to the Georgia Institute of Technology.

ORGANIZATION:

CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION

.N0.:

99900323/83-01 RESULTS:

) AGE 3 of 7 This item remains open pending Region IV evaluation of the Canax written response to the 82-01 inspection report.

2.

(0 pen) Nonconformance (82-01):

Exhibit A of NQA Procedure 14.1 was entitled " Operation and Inspection Record (traveler) Forms Nos. N-30 and N-30A" when in reality Exhibit A of NQA Procedure 14.1 was a table of "Conax inspection stamps."

l This item remains open for the same reason listed in D.1 above.

3.

(0 pen)Nonconformance(82-01):

Procedures had not been written or approved by the quality control manager for the calibration of the Veeco helium leak detectors and serial numbers of equipment calibrated had not been recorded in the MS90 calibration record logs.

This item remains open for the same reason listed in D.1 above.

4.

(0 pen) Nonconformance (82-01): A material disposition report was not prepared and affixed to Part No. 7769-20002-01, Unit 10-8 as required by paragraph 15.1.3 of the Conax NQAM after failure in the dielectric test.

This item remains open for the same reason listed in D.1 above.

E.

OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:

1.

Quality Assurance Manual: The NRC inspection team performed an indepth review / evaluation of the Conax NQAM to assure that the Conax written quality assurance procedures address and are consistent with all applicable regulatory requirements. The basic Conax NQAM, consisting of 19 sections, is written to comply with the requirements contained in Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, 10 CFR Part 21, ANSI N45.2, and Section III Division 1 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) boiler and pressure vessel code.

The Conax Quality Assurance Program has been reviewed by the ASME and Conax is currently manufacturing products under ASME Certificates of Authorization Nos. N-1849 and N-1850.

The NRC inspection team evaluated the Conax NQAM against all 18 criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the requirements contained in 10 CFR Part 21.

One violation (paragraph A. above) was identified.

ORGANIZ\\ TION: CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION N0.:

99900323/83-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 4 of 7 2.

Quality Assurance Program Implementation:

The NRC inspection team verified the implementation of the Conax NQAM by examining representative documents and records, personnel training and certificaiton records, interviewing inspection and test personnel, and by visual observations and inspections.

Comments concerning the implementation review keyed to each individual criterion of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the requirements contained in 10 CFR Part 21 are as follows:

a.

Organization:

The Conax organizational structure was reviewed as well as the organizational authorities and responsibilities.

The current staffing pattern was compared to the organization chart contained in the Section 2.1 of the NQAM. The quality assurance manager reports directly to the corporation president and has the authority to stop work or testing when he deems it necessary.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

b.

Quality Assurance Program:

The NRC inspection team evaluated this criterion by verifying the implementation of:

(1) the other 17 criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50; and (2) the requirements contained in 10 CFR Part 21. Training and indoctrination records for three individuals were reviewed to establish that the training program had been implemented in accordance with NQAM commitments.

l Four program implementation nonconformances were identified, each of which is discussed in Section B. above.

c.

Design Control:

The NRC inspector determined that Conax designs safety-related equipment test fixtures and translates applicable design requirements into test plans / procedures.

Three test plans were examined to determine that design requirements were translated in accordance with the Conax NQAM.

No nonconformances were identifed within this area.

d.

Procurement Document Control: The NRC inspector reviewed four Conax purchase requisitions and four Conax purchase orders all related to nuclear equipment to verify that Conax was processing procurement documents in accordance with the NQAM procedures.

l

ORGANIZATION:

CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION

.NO.-

99900323/83-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 5 of 7 No nonconformances were identified within this area.

e.

Instruction, Procedure, Drawing:

The NRC inspector verified implementation of the Conax written procedures as they relate to this criterion by reviewing three test plans / procedures and related testing reports and data.

No nonconformances were identified within this area, f.

Document Control: The NRC inspector reviewed two drawings and drawing record cards, one specification and revision record card, and two drawing changes to verify proper review and approval in accordance with the Conax NQAM.

Two drawings and one specification were selected in the work areas to verify that proper documents were available and being used.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

g.

Control of Purchased Marerial, Equipment and Services:

The NRC inspector verified the implementation of the Conax NQAM procedures for this criterion by evaluating two nuclear vendor files and the approved nuclear vendors list and applicable Certificates of Conformances.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

h.

Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components:

The NRC inspector verified the implementation of the Conax NQAM procedures by reviewing the receiving inspection reports for three tube headers designated as pressure boundary parts and by verifying the markings on this material.

In addition three specimens from the equipment qualification testing laboratory were selected and the identification and traceability of each specimen were verified.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

l i.

Control of Special Processes:

The NRC inspector determined that all special processes performed by Conax are in connection with their manufacturing effort and are not applicable to the equipment qualification area.

t ORGANIZATION: CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT INSPECTION

.NO.:

99900323/83-01 RESULTS:

PAGE 6 of 7 j.

Inspection: The NRC inspector verified the implementation of the Conax NQAM procedures by reviewing two travelers for signatures and stamps. Work was observed and one QC inspector for this work area was interviewed concerning use of inspection stamps.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

k.

Test Control: Conax is a manufacturer but also operates a testing laboratory which performs both Canax sponsored and customer requested testing.

The NRC inspector reviewed three test plans / procedures to verify applicable standards were included. The completed test report for one test program was reviewed to verify that required test prerequisites were met.

Within this area the nonconformance discussed in paragraph B.4 was identified.

1.

Control of Measuring and Test Equipment:

The NRC inspector evaluated the Conax NQAM procedures relative to this criterion to determine if the measuring and test equipment were being controlled.

Two electrical and one mechanical measuring devices were selected to verify status of calibration.

Five pieces of calibration equipment were selected to verify traceability to national standards.

Disposition and corrective action records were reviewed for one gage found out of calibration and the equipment calibration technician was interviewed to determine his familiarity with the Conax written procedures.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

m.

Handling, Storage, and Shipping: The NRC inspector verified that Conax was following their written procedures by examining one receiving inspection report for three test specimens and l

observing that each specimen was adequately identified and stored.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

n.

Inspection, Test, and Operating Status:

The NRC inspector verified that Conax was following their written procedures in this area by visually inspecting the testing and storage areas for testing status and status of nonconforming items.

ORGANIZATION:

CONAX CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK REPORT l INSPECTION N0.:

99900323/83-01 lRESULTS:

PAGE 7 of 7 No nonconformances were identified within this area.

o.

Nonconforming Material, Parts, or Components: The NRC inspector verified Conax compliance to its NQAM commitments by selecting three nonconformances to verify signatures and format.

One nonconforming gage was observed in the calibration area with the proper tag affixed. Two reports concerning 10 CFR Part 21 defects were reviewed.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

p.

Corrective Action:

The NRC inspector verified that Conax was following their written procedures in this area by determining that the requested corrective action for two selected nonconformances was accomplishea.

One deviatiun reported in accordance with 10 CFR Part 21 was reviewed to determine that the stated corrective action was accomplisited.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

q.

Quality Assurance Records:

The NRC inspector verified that Conax was complying with the procedures contained in the basic NQAM as well as supplemental Quality Assurance Instruction 17.1.1 by reviewing a sample of completed QA records and by a physical examination of the record storage facility.

No nonconformances were identified within this area.

i r.

Audits: The NRC inspector examined three audit reports, two l

reaudit reports, eight related reports / letters, and two lead I

auditor qualification folders to verify compliance to Conax written procedures.

Within this area the nonconformances discussed in paragraphs B.1 and B.2 above were identified.

3.

Implementation of 10 CFR Part 21:

The NRC inspector observed the physical posting to determine that Conax was in compliance with their written procedures.

In addition, two reports concerning 10 CFR Part 21 defects were reviewed.

l Within this area the nonconform&nce discussed in paragraph B.3 above was identified.

1 l

e S '.

F.ev. 3 75 2.T~END.GCE LIST c o M P. w y:

C OAIA %

CORP.

pCCXIT NO. 999 Do 3 23 Date: z/zz/s3

_;g :3 33pec:ica crierence i I Pas-Inspecnon co.-lerenc

p (Please NAM [(Ptesse Eint)

TITLE (F1. ease ?rint) i ORGA.NIZAT10N.%t)

A LVA L Sh CrIf ECuff. 00nL. $7EST E wA USNRG KI

,f W

h VA W\\

A*- /) 9 (*A%W l'

2Js JV(

Y h

,-R.L.IDMeou&E M&R OF C, ul-(TV, Amitkcra. O MA%

I A. E, Da L$}%;

/>1Av46 M ~ EAsd#e.c Te$7~ l C. o s sst.)( C.ogf e

I

! Pt.w r N0/Jnwl h

('ouny

$ceP

. 7 L /JMPMIM

-#A l' Ve e m i(%s= Ew #$/

Gooy &w i

r l

i Db1s fxir s//>gpr i

hAwx J.D.

l%rz Mfswerac/p/arn i l

uc 1 /A J,. C / % d i b E>. Mic L i.

0 l

l i

I i

i l

i i

t i

i l

i I

h l

l

^

l t

i I

inspector k SM IT k 79960523 """ No. Ps -

e g3.of Report Scope / Module OA PRoseAm DOCUMENTS EXAMINED n

i 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

.4

)

4 CohAX Co R P NM Ct.EA R Q VA LIT'Y A SSytANCi MAht/M L

/ l4.I e L E

7.

8 PeesonusL z u beerr.iw roco A Alb 7tM4/4 to-R ECOK b 2//G/?3

~

3 8

su so si gojzgjp u 4

8 9/s7le y S

9 A U'btTott.

GyAupacA rrou s=ol.bc oe.

A-st THl~rt.

t-/ A EFA>Est.

~~

~

C, P

K. L.

%veoutE

~

~

7 3

04A t i r y AssuRANCG WSTMWC T/en A/UCL SA L I f. l.

9lO)E t-O

q u A L t rIc AT l cAJ GF OUALITv A SStigAAscG At/ber PEK3DN4EL

8 5

CONA/

PutcHASE odbEK 9 39 3c /

/]6 /23 cd J-9 2

MEcusstTicAs 9 2.3 2 12/tzJr L 10 5

o KbEra.

73930

///t /P L II 5

69621 l}7 /P 2.-

IL 2

l' tze outstrica) o4237 t/s/r t-13 5

ei o,Cb e m.

739/3 eo/a7h z.

(CEQuts tTro As C 38//

10 /EN ff t.

14-8

~

IS 8

ConA)c IvTEx4AL.

.o+tib/T' KE/MT' fxcet bott 3* / (RE-Atibit)

Coun y 2.e PorLY wrctyA L A @ui oF THE QslALtT1 Asstimet j'ptinury Ib 8

9/zs/t t Cov7Re c PusscYsans,,

Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Numbt 2.

Speci fica tion 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document t

3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document l

4.

QA Manual 8.

Ollier (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applical

Inspector A.Sisstr)+

99900523' pp_of R epo r t No. 14, --

Scope / Module CA PgO(r(24m DOCUMENTS EXAMINED 6

1 2

TITLE / SUBJECT 3

.4 1)

/

CobAx iorexnA L Afb /'r 12Epose 7-b//0l? E-I?

9 r nAX LEPo <r Iv7EstNAt-Auhs7 />+~7WE A bArio/Syt4 rit!6' fo/Fff't o

~

< s DOA p iz.B c c b u s2 E S 19 4

Cou4y roa

'h. 'b u Ao u d.E To G. RHobs 3 Sfi61EcT: 'rvirun Aub/7 7 /MF l 7o G

C0AJAf /LE t>o n T 00d fL E C Ta v E A CTIO N REPO RT

G. RMo'k h 5 Nl'Tl[ L

?.- l 8

Co4Ay oegp6AT 3 AsTE 41 Ast\\ s.

Q E AuhtT

@//o}( t

~

~2 L L

IoM 'h.'htu? o un E 'To C. % E A/V

" CDME(nt/G ACTnCAV jD7EMt. 44byy' T/2 '))( L 23 rom

" m, sv aT r s, o f: 9 /t e /r L mee'rfac coocem uc. T+7s son 9 /t, /# t

^

A u'br T co e/ZEc'ro vE A C T I on

L A-G Io m D. blillt etKE 'r 0 L. B G A AI

247tstan t 10abir cost /EchvGisc7som "

l0/a f/( L ZS S

.To m

'%. 'bu A' n u n. E TO L. GEw 12}3 f f t zG g

7e n

.o e,

e

,jgg

'L ')

2 CCAa A )L R E 90 fLT

'C 4 T E t1 N A L AuhI'T CCHittcTo sfE Ath0A' /2EAWT '

t sy;cx

,/j9/['3" n

2A G

e eu 1 a v po n.r

.7nttitosu REAubur a e po re T' ' '

'h. 'D <t vinu KE i/z+ Je3

~2.9 9

AldPLEA/L s/EN'boe File " 'r,-EM A

/hsr/ruTC C/"

7ECN40c 06-Y

~

~

~

Bo 2

Aluc u AtL.

V 6' h e /L F;lL E -

SegrHkGrr 4Esmer/

ss/5777a 78-

~

v

  • ) l g

AttlCLEAl2 APPRot/EP VGA/ DOL US7/NG.

Z/)4/d5 Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Numbe 2.

Speci fi ca tion 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Le t.ter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applical

)1 b

a l

e l

m c

e u

i i.n

(

N l

tt p

' A "o

4 mnnp "N

eeea t mm "t

I uuf r

ccI

" o l oo(

p 3

ADD

" e 3

c i

n "R

tff o

/

l8 t

nooi L

/r/

e s

t 3

L

ueei 3

/

l/

sqpt v 3,

/

neyae 3

T-2 8 mSTDR g

u 2_

l 9,

$r o

s 9g n

C1234 e

a A

4 s

C-ri e

b N

/

c S

I o

s n

E 7

Y

-6 7 s

I A

C T 7

/

v t

C L

r A

t n

A b

U e

u P

E Q

u m

c t

tr b

/

v a f

m f

r c/

e e

A S

t A

o b

e v

r w

f m i

s A

f u

e r/

b c

h A

A D

o r

c

(

E r

E s

F i

s "7 N

T e

o O

, /r.

A y

I C

M E

p r

D y

A J

s N

c X

B o

1 u

E U

1 b

e h

i v

S L

~

S

/

n E n T

E s

/

s 4

u t

N L

w uM u

s u

2 E

T

)

t 7

y G

M I

u U

T A

M e

r t

u )., u e l a

C t

O s

D 4

o

^

f c

c s

u $

e P

n o

c f u r

t a s e

i t

n.

6-n nnc E

y er W

S A

u f

M a s

s i

e s

t t

7 4

s w

/

U 7

o y

/- n T

S t

ro f

i l

u C

y s r

em i

de c

w h y

o rM e

O p

F o

6-7 c

c t

l S

tE e

n o

g p

v y

u e+

sa

(

e C

i anr n

y G E

h rer i

A t

a P

cet e m

/

m rt th c

s u

unet T

n c PI LO s

e C

y h.

t s

E n

c a

/

s r 3 A

r S

i G

v x

5678 e

o N

o 4

o c f

I c

  • r o

C M

t 4

n A

o S

3 i

s t

A e

ael 2

'3 y gi uu p

cra A

O 2

T nfd n iiea t wccM e

naeo l

erprA u

mDSPQ r

d u

Y 3

c o

o

+

t M

o 3

D1 234 c

/

1 3

e e

p p

s o

n c

i S

~

PERSONS CONTACTED Ccmpany C0 AIM CoAP oazeg 2/e 2 - zs/p3 Docket / Report do. 999/o 323/#3-o/

Inspector 4 T4 / 7W' Page /'

of l

IAME(Please Print)

TIRE (Please print)

ORGANIZ.2 TION (Please 3rint) b.

bel 2outE

$A MAPAGE12-C04AJ R. Tu tsa

%,t-e s a rer r

Enspec2cr 2 WA Ait 7od 9990p323 Repori Ha. g3.o[

Scrpe/Hodule dA.' 94og-XA m DOCUMENTS EXNilliED

\\

3 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 ffG 5

0h MBA5 I ni)

\\

k z

.2.

, res-is z.

g

.3 1

7&k l-3002 o g

N' f, W

! FA)91aff do NG> drk Est. #(l57 5'

i 1N6s-t(e0 i(

E A>G j 0 f Od A'4 C8 t.t._.

M - 2 '/' I Y (o

/

\\

'7 I

d 3d' 09 (o

-)(-

?-

1

') l 7 V > 10 0 0 1 S

s 4

'L ifs

-7"J'2.

ft.

to 7/

(2 6 IDn w d L J - L 90 9 70 a 3 l\\

T Mh' Ade<M dd-G PS N 7 '1 % 3.

\\L

%wtt$1b kueN &

k k k Qcud*SS b *khn)* (,CIL

~

in

('

13 y'

/

v

<1'

,,y,4 d

I bas Ov4M 9&f 21 Moa R 197P da. : ( alk.c. % M b k.1 Ahe r, if 7r m

ti k'

$$u!A D furk : 19Y39.L9 V '3, 2.9 979 2 9 Yil lb T

(,ut Mh (64

g. -] O - t z. u o z.6

(,a aW 6 -f 2 - &

O t7 Y

b di(; & k ( W 4 p g s g Q g,, W f f{all lif. O h lg'3 Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential item Number 2.

Speci fica tion 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

l s

fi b

a m

c u

i N

l tt p b

4

~

mnnp eeea I

~

t mm t

I uuf r

ccI o

l oo(

p ADD e

i n

R tff o nooi e

s

~

~

ueei s q pt v 3

neyae mSTDR u

l o

C1234 k

4 D

It Y

2 t

o (w

4 D

Y a

p v

)

/s h

D E

T

/

s l

t.

l I

C 6

d k

+n M

E A

J X

B E

U m

S r

S

/

e T

E

r. J i

L Q-k l

E T

)

/

y M

I r

U T

0 u

C 0

a O

t

/

D s

D l

s i

0 l

e l

c 3

U 0

e n

l a

f c

f Q

3 y

m ro f

em t

f de c

rM e

O p

k f-l S

t Y &

L 9

sa

(

2 b

anr hrer cet e 4U rtth L

unet x

PI LO L

e (uI(

A8 O A 5678

& r no i

s t

T r 'L I e

ael p

cra 2

y gi uu Tnfd n it ea t wccM naeo erprA mDSPQ uc W

9 A

l o...

S D1234 I

1 7

g#

(

C g

l

PERSONS CONTAu :D Ccmpany CM'M CM P Dates 2/Z2-zS /2 3 Docket / Report No. QQ9 OO323}g3-o/

inspector

'T AIAnts.7w 1

Page l of LAME (Please Print)

TIT 1.E(Please Orint)

ORGANIZATION (? lease Print) b,'c k b oat b A. g y CM GwtS f RWMFM P6c ~ S OAM EM6A ~

iz..., cr. m m

~

o.c. m m c a

q. c. %, 4.

1 eTErYFWy O G N7WEiryAut3 0. C'.

fpr.sPfc 7~e8 (D. (. /)j^P f MalIm 6. R/mya o L rrA a c-- W 1

)

i

W ' " ' " '

QQ96032]

Report flo.ths sccpe/Hodule M 9/eoc,.e4 m DOCUMEllTS EXAHillED 1

2 TITLE /SUDJECT 3

4

/

4,

/) e a c, p %,,n

% o n,v g pA,,,, n u ll<//2 i G

2 7

T/5-779 l"nt:/OrG.ht. pad,Id li,,,.

[* el.fal insLL d t ccA le d'wl tL 1/n/92 4

3 7

705 9sJ '2)i.E,2.,etell.e1. $ % / 8h,, 1 4. L J

  • A A i O L h. 8.

YW$2 6

iPs-2 d ')):,J $.k YJhv,t2 * ',u n !' haej J % ;

n l'JL 1.,1 7/re/2z-A 4

2 0

h,u b+%L) ( J,L 8: b'/u. 2, '

/

7

-r f< - i n. v " :.

?.. :1 M. t,+fi,, ',~ V, it, e iCa,

L.... ) a'/<k.

2 != i n A

n

/,

[,..'

j <..) f j, l

.,, j ),

  • l f,4,0, gy, gj,,,3 3,,f.,) 7f',, f,)

jj/pq/f ff

/

p n:.6, +. ;4. '..ir:1,e n-wru A., >'s L.J L L/ / a.] L.LI o

I

)

l l

l l

l Document Types:

Columns:

l 1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential item Numbe 2.

Speci fica tion 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Hanual 8.

Other (Spect fy-1f necessary) 4.

Reviston (1f applicab

-a

~

PERSONS CONTACE"U Ccmpany 004'M COAP Cates 2./22 - a s/F3 Docket / Report No. 99900323/F 3-o /

Inspector E-4/+04 Page l of

!AME(Please Printi TIT 1.E(Please Drint)

ORGANIZATION (? lease :" int) r.e C/ Y O!.) V W 0 (+

lb r".,,

edAy ($, x y S 'lO

?

S.) t 3 e.

A0e, f - [s. : r % <

nA h AF) b']O fvt $,\\a r - T mc r

??')c fAmastc e

~ac l

1 l

l I

C t.

?.c ? 3 -C -75 AT5NDANCE LIST COMPANY: Con 41 cogr, DCCXET NO.9998032 3 z/zy) g 3 Date:

! Pre-hspec:ica C:riere::ce I y1 Post Espec::en Coriere.a.8 (Pies.se NAME INase ? int)

'I'TLE (?). ease ?rint) l ORGANIZATION ?-int) 4L VA L. ' $n }7H ESW, $ML.$7ts7 EA/GA f/5f/C A / U.

\\

T2 (C.4A 2O (.

f3 hec ou 0l h% 2 CoMdX y~

- b,1 e r> c W.s< i sesna + -- ns* c,w u klllPtM EDL%r1/

IU6 O2 V1519sJ O13M i EML b. $0 tGk

\\

l' P Q n T a 10 r tna Las f

e 4hv4 M Q h,gh.

b gaTTL,* 6 (D A e4 % (an FIR.

OON%

ed h6 D wf e

e g

' - hD r !r

t. {

t}M0MA%

Pt it r) Y MR7U A 6 f IL NAV r

l 5 /U$,5 b. hh/hk/)C*l fk W 5 /DNN r

/

l 1 /d/bu a C Saallo C < < V, V

't tlks$kmiU I did fra a,6xen,Wns\\ 4SMW t

i I

1 i

I I

I I

i I

i l

3 I

)

i l

l i

I I

i 1.

l i

i