ML20012D688
| ML20012D688 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/15/1990 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lewis M LEWIS, M. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9003280239 | |
| Download: ML20012D688 (1) | |
Text
p
~
F a
.jy
{
W t
L March 15, 1990 Distribution aGentre4J4pt.
ADSP Reading NRC PDR (w/ incoming)
LocalPDR,(w/ incoming)
DCrutchfield Mr. Marvin Lewis TQuay 7801 Roosevelt Blvd. # 62 DMossburg, PMAS
/
Philadelphia, PA 19152
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Dr.'Murley has referred your request to me for response. - To answer your question, as a result of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's)
_ investigation into restrictive language in settlement agreements, no non-written, verbal agreements (threats) were identified.
However,NRCregulations(10CFRPart50.7)providep(threatened)for rotection for individuals that believe that they are harassed and intimidated identification of safety issues.
Individuals who believe they have been discriminated against for raising safety questions may file a complaint with the Department of Labor (DOL). The NRC will pursue any safety issues identified as part of the complaint.
00L has a process in which resolution of the complaint is first sought.
If the complaint is not resolved, a hearing is conducted and a D0L ruling is reached. Review of the D0L ruling can be sought by both parties to the complaint.
Upon completion of the DOL process, the NRC-can and has in the past taken enforcement action against the employer for harassment and intimidation.
I thank you for the opportunity to respond to your question.
1 Sincerely, original signed by Dennis M. Crutchfield, Associate Director for Special Projects e
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation fpot y
p 0
9 p*
i CP 6
0FC :ADSP:TA
- AD JNAME:TQuay'h.....:@ :D ute field:
' LDATE :3//.//90
- 3//g/90 h
-0FFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
LEWIS LETTER 9003280239 900315 g
b.
PDR. ORG NRRB
.]j
.