ML20012B372
| ML20012B372 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/20/1990 |
| From: | Jordan E Committee To Review Generic Requirements |
| To: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, NUDOCS 9003140282 | |
| Download: ML20012B372 (14) | |
Text
- -.
9:
4 i hl, c
,; x
~.
i 00g{o DE e
4 i
g UNITED STATES Mb g e,
!/
c
,g NUCLEAR RCGULATORY COMMISSION O
4+
y:
wAsMiwoTow, o. c. 20sss
- k..... / '
February 20, 1990 MEMORANDUM FOR:
James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations FROM:
Edward L. Jordan, Chairman i
Committee to Review Generic Requirements
SUBJECT:
MINUTES OF CRGR MEETING NUMBER 178 1
The Committee to Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) met on Thursday, January 25,1990 from 1:00-5:30 p.m.
The following items were addressed at the meeting:
1.
'T. King (RES) and W. Beckner (RES) presented for CRGR review a proposed Commission paper and generic letter supplement on containment performance improvement as related to Individual Plant Examinations.
The Committee did not complete its. review of this matter.
The staff agreed to revise the Commission paper and generic. letter to identify dominant vulnerabili-ties obsqaved for various containment types with examples of measures to affect thne vulnerabilities rather than emphasis on " fixes" since the staff did not have cost beneficial generic fixes.
The revised documents would then be circulated to CRGR members on a negative consent basis, with no further meeting planned.
This matter is discussed in Enclosure 2.
l -
2.
T. King (RES) and M. Jamgochian (RES) presented for CRGR review a proposed rulemaking package (for public comment) entitled " Emergency Preparedness Rulemaking Relating to Part 52 Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants."
The Committee supported the staff's logic that the emergency decision but the exercise is not. preparedness plan and exercise criteria the package to the EDO subject to a number of revisions.The Committee re L
This matter is discussed in Enclosure 3.
3.
S. Newberry (NRR) and D. Lasher (NRR) presented for CRGR review a draft generic letter clarifying the staff position on the vendor interface issue (Generic Letter 83-28, Item 2.2.2).
The Committee recommended in favor of issuing the generic letter subject to some revisions, including
't revision of the generic letter to reflect two classes of treatment for vendors rather than.three and changing the time for response to 180 days.- This matter is discussed in Enclosure 4.
-In accordance with the ED0's July 18, 1983 t,
directive concerning " Feedback and L
Closure of CRGR Reviews," a written response is required from the cognizant n
office to report agreement or disagreement with the CRGR recommendations in
/
The response, which is required within five working days afte l
these minutes.
w h hO go031Q y
M s r w m, %n g Ne N
.m
D ~,.
-i n
,.d; Y si,;d ' > %,
i
_ g,,
i j
- ^
,.;..r.
9 l-receipt of these minutes, is to.be forwarded to the CRGR Chairman and if there p
is disagreement with CRGR recommendations, to the EDO for decisionmaking, i:
[
Questions concerning these meeting minutes should be referred to Dennis j
l:
A111 son'(492-4140).
Onginal Signed By: i l
C. J. Heltemes, Jr.
f-EdwardL. Jordan,Chakrman i
e Committee to Review Generic 7
Requirements p
Enclosures:
l
~As stated I
cc w/ enclosures:
Commission (5)
SECY J.'Lieberman i
P. Norry D. Williams Regional Administrators CRGR Members.
Distribution: w/o enclosures OgWNEUF8te %
PDR(NRC/CRGR)
S.LTreby W. Little
-M.
Lesar-P. Kadambi (w/ene.)
CRGR CF:(w/ enc. )
CRGR SF-(w/ enc.)
M. Taylor (w/ enc.)
W. Minners (w/ enc.)
W. Beckner (w/ enc.)
M.'Jamgochian (w/ enc.)
A. Thadani (w/ enc.)
S. Newberry (w/ enc.)
.R. W. Houston (w/ enc.)
,E.' Jordan (w/ enc.)
J. Heltemes'(w/ enc.)-
J. Conran (w/ enc.)-
p D. Allison (w/ enc.)
'o
. 0FC-- : - AE0D:C GR :
AE0D:00
- C/CRG AE00 :
m Q.
. NAME' : DAllifo : cg _ : CJ temes : E, rdan DATE $ 2/4 /90 2@/90 2 M /90 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY i
. -- - - - --- !