ML20011D468
| ML20011D468 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000128 |
| Issue date: | 12/18/1989 |
| From: | Collins S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Richardson H TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8912270293 | |
| Download: ML20011D468 (12) | |
Text
'
c i
nec is me i
~
Cw j
n l
3.
._ [
1 Reply Refer To:
4-f4 6et:
50-128 l
t Dr. Herbert H. Richardson, Director Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University 1
College Station. Texas 77843 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
' LICENSING EXAMINATIONS AT TAMU NSC TRIGA In a telephoae conversation between Mr. D. E. Feltz and Mr. J. L. pellet, Chief, Operator Licensing Section, arrangements were made for the administration
.of licensing examinations at the Nuclear Science Center TRIGA during the week c'/ March 5,1990.
To meet the above schedule, it will be necessary for you to furnish the reference material listed in Enclosure 1, " Reference Material Requirements for Reactor /
Senior Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations," to the extent applicable to your facility by December 30, 1989. Any delay in receiving approved, properly bound, and indexed reference material could result in a delay in administering tne examinations. Mr. D. E. Feltz has been advised of our reference material requirements ar,d where to send the material.
You are responsible for providing adequate spate and accommodations for administration of the seritten examinations. Enclosure 2, " Requirements for Administration of Written Examinations," describes our requirements for conducting these naaminations.
Pr. D. E. Feltz has also been informed of these requirements.
' Enclosure 3, " Procedures for the Administration of Written Examinations,"
contains the rules and guidelines that will be in effect during the.
administrr. tion of the written examinations. The facility management is responsibir for ensuring that all applicants are aware of these rules.
The facility staff review of the written examinations will be conducted in
- accordance with requirements specitied in Enclosure 4, " Requirements for
. Facility Review of Written Examinations." Mr. D. E. Feltz has been informed i
of these requirements.
'.All completed reactor operator and senior reactor operator license applications Tshould be submitted at least 30 days before the first examination date so that we shall be able to review the training and experience of the candidates,
- prkess-the medical certifications, and prepare final examiner assignments after applicant eligibility has been determined.
If the applications m
are not received at least 30 days before the examination date, it is likely P
that a postponement will be necessary, w
/3
- RIV:C:0LS U:DRS D:
JLPellet/lb.
LJCap Ss ellfns t/. /89 f89
, previously concurre 6912270293 691216 PDR ADOCK 0500 8
8 i v
i m
t l
l Texas A&M University This request is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number 3150-0101, which expires May 31, 1992. The estimated average burden is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per response, including gathering, copying, and mailing the required material. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Records and Reports Management Branch, Division of Information Support Services, Office of Information Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project (3150-0101), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding the examination procedures and requirements, please contact Mr. J. L. Pellet, Chief, Operator Licensing Section, at (817) 860-8159.
Sincerely, Signed 4
@ l J. Co4Rns Samue Samuel J. Collins, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
Reference Material Requirements for Reactor / Senior Reactor Operator Licensing Examinations 2.
Requirements for Administration of Written Examinations 3.
Procedures for Administracion of Written Examinationt 4.
Requirements for Facility Review of Written Examinations cc w/ enclosures:
Dr. William H. Mobley, President Department of Nuclear Engineering Texas A&M University
. College Station, Texas 77843 Dr. John W. Poston, Interim
. Department Head Department of Nuclear Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 M. E. McLain Radiation Safety Officer Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843
l
8.
A Texa A&M Unive.sity Mr. Feenan Jennings, Chairman Reactor Safety Board Texas A&M University College. Station, Texas 77843 Mr. Donald E. Feltz, Director Nuclear Science Center
- Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 Texas State Department of Health 1100 W. 49th Street Austin,-Texas. 18756 Texas Bureau of Radiation Control ATTH:
C. Dittman,. Region 6 1100 W. 49th Street Austin, Texas 78756 bectoDMB(IE42) bec:
R. Martin L. Miller, TTC C:RPSB-DRSS T. Michaels, NRR Project Manager
_ DRP E. Himes
' RIV File DRS.(J. L. Pellet Reading File)
J. L. Pellet J
B. Beach, DRSS C:FRPS-
- RPB-DRSS LFMB-Facilities Section R. Cooley, NRR-OLB B. Wetzel, NRR-OLB i
i i
1 g.
t i
ENCLOSURE I REFERENCE MATERIAL REQUIREMEtiTS FOR REACTOR / SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSIllG i
EXAMINATIONS
- 1..
Existing learning objectives, job performance measures, and lesson plans (including training manuals, plant orientation manual, system t
descriptions, reactor theory, thermodynamics, etc.).
Training materials should::nclude all substantive written material used for preparing applicants for initial R0 and SRO licensing. The written material should include learning objectives and the details
) resented L
during lectures, rather than outlines. Training materials siould be identified by plant and unit, bound, and indexed.
Failure to provide complete, properly bound, and indexed plant reference material may result in the cancellation of the examinations and the return of the material to the person who is the corporate officer responsible for plant operation (e.g., Vice President of Nuclear Operations).
If there are deficiencies in the licensee material, this should be explained in a cover letter accompanying the material. Training materials, which include the following, should be provided:
System descriptions including descriptions of all operationally relevant flow paths, components, controls, and instrumentation.
System training material should draw parallels to the actual procedures used for operating the applicable system.
f Complete and operationally useful descriptions of all safety-system interactions and, where available, B0P system interactions under emergency and abnormal conditions, including consequences of anticipated operator error, maintenance error, and equipment failure.
Training material used to clarify and strengthen understanding of emergency operating procedures.
Comprehensive theory material that includes fundamentals in the area of theory of reactor operation, thermodynamics, heat transfer, and-fluid flow, as well as specific application to actual in-plant components. - F0r example, mechanical theory material on pumps should include pump theory as well as descriptions of how these principles actually ap(ply to major plant pumps and the systems in which they are installed i.e., reactor coolant pumps, all ECCS pumps, recirculation pumps, feedwater pumps, and emergency feedwater pumps). Reactor theory material should include descriptions that draw explicit ties between the fundamentals and the actual operating limits followed in the plant (i.e., reactor theory material shculd contain explanations as to how principles relate to the actual curves used by operators to verify shutdown ECP nargin or calculate an ECP).
y (1
g-r
.y, l
V 2.
CompleteProcedureIndex(includingsurveillanceprocedures,etc.)
3.
All edministrative procedures (as applicable to reactor operation or safety)
[
4.
.Allintegratedplantprocedures(norrniorgeneraloperatingprocedures) p
[
.5.
Emergency procedures (emergency instructions, abnormal or special p
procedures)
I 6.
Standing orders (important orders that are safety-related and may l
b supersedetheregularprocedures) l i
7.
Surveillance procedures (procedures that are run frequently, i.e., weekly or that can be run on the simulator)
{
L 8.
Fuel-handling and core-loading procedures, (initial core-loading l
procedure,whenappropriate) 9.
Annunciator / alarm procedures
- 10. Radiation protection manual (radiation control manual or procedures) r
- 11. Emergency plan implementing procedures l
- 12. TechnicalSpecifications(andinterpretations,ifavailable)
- 13. System operating procedures
'14.
Piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical single-line diagrams, or flow diagrams
- 15. Technical Data Book, and/or plant curve information as used by operators and facility precautions,. limitations, and setpoints (PLS) for tie facility
~ 16. ' Questions and answers specific to the facility training program which may -
be used in the written or operatus examinations (voluntary by facility licensee) 8
- 17. The following material for the plant reference simulation facility:
a.
List of all preprogrammed initial conditions b.
List of all present malfunctions with a clear identification number.
The list should include cause and effect information. Specifically, for each malfunction a concise description of the expected result, or range of results, that will occur upon implementation should be provided. - Additionally, an indication of which annunciators are to be initially expected should be given.
]
u c.
A description of simulator failure capabilities for valves, breakers, indicators, and alarms 3
I d.
Where the capability exists, an explanation of the ability to vary the severity of a particular malfunction should be provided, i.e.,
ability to vary the size of a given LOCA or steam leak, or the ability to cause a slow failure of a component such as a feed pump, feedwater control valve)jor valve (e.g., drifting shut of a main turbine generator, or ma e.
An identification of modeling conditions / problems that may impact the examination f.
Identification of any known performance test discrepancies not yet corrected g.
Identification of differences between the simulator and the reference 4
plant's control room h.
Copies of facility generated scenarios that expose the applicants to capability (PWR and BWR) pressure control (PWR), degraded heat rem situations of decreased be provided (voluntary by licensee) 1.
Simulator instructor's manual (voluntary by licensee) j.
Description of the scenarios used for the training class (voluntary by licensee)
- 18. Additional material required by the examiners to develop examinations that meet the requirements of these Standards and the regulations.
The above reference material should be the approved, current issue, and it should be so marked.
If a plant has not finalized some of the material, the Chief Examiner shall verify with the facility that the most complete, up-to-date
-material is available and that agreement has been reached with the licensee for limiting changes before-the administration of the examination. All procedures and reference material should be bound in the form used by the control room operators, with appropriate indexes or tables of contents so that they can be used efficiently.
P
l t
ENCLOSURE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS 1.
A single room shall be provided for administration of the written examination.
The location of this room and supporting restroom facilities shall be such as to prevent contact with all other facility and/or contractor personnel during the written examination.
If necessary, the facility should make arrangements for the use of a suitable room at a local school, motel, or other building. Obtaining this room is the responsibility of the licensee.
2.
Minimum spacing is required to ensure examination integrity as determined by the Chief Examiner. Minimum spacing should be one applicant per table, with a 3-foot space between tables.
3.
Suitable arrangements shall be made by the facility if the applicants are to have lunch, coffee, or other refreshments. These arrangements shall comply with Item 1 above and shall be reviewed by the examiner and/or proctor.
4 The facility licensee shall arovide pads of 8 1/2-by 11-inch lined paper in unopened packages for eac1 applicant's use in completing the examination.
The examiner shall distribute these pads to the applicants.
5.
Applicants may bring pens, pencils, calculators, or slide rules into the examination room..Only black ink or dark pencils should be used for writing answers to questions.
6.
The licensee shall provide one set of steam tables for each applicant. When documents (y the Chief Examiner, the licensee shall prepare copies of large requested b e.g., Technical Specifications, Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures, or Emergency Operating Procedures) for use by the applicants.
Such request will normally be made to the licensee at least one working day prior to the written examination. The examiner shall distribute the steam tables to the applicants.
No wall charts, models, and/or other training materials shall be visible in the examination room. No other equipment or reference material shall be allowed unless provided by the examiner.
y 1
[
e ENCLOSURE 3 PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS i-The Chief Examiner or Proctor shall:
1.
CheckLidentification badges.
2.
Pass out examinations and all handouts. Remind applicants not to review examination until instructed to do so.
READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS VERBATIM:
"During the administration of this examination the following rules apply:
"1.
Cheating on the examination means an automatic denial of your application and could result in more severe penalties, t
"2.
After the examination has been completed, you must sign the statement _ on the cover sheet indicating that the work is your own and you have not received or given assistance in completing the examination. This must be done af ter you complete the examination."
READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
Restroom trips are to be limited and only one applicant at a time may
~1 eave. You must avoid all contacts with anyone outside the examination 1 room to avoid even the appearance or possibility of cheating.
2.
Use black ink or dark pencil only to facilitate legible reproductions.
3.
Print your name in the blank provided in the upper right-hand corner of i
L the examination cover sheet.
~ 4.
Fill in the date on the cover sheet of the examination (if necessary).-
5.
Use only the paper provided for your answers.
6.-
Print your name in the upper right-hand corner of the first page of'each section of the answer sheet and initial each succeeding page.
7.
Consecutively number each answer sheet.
8.
Write "End of Category _" at the end of your answers to a category.
9.
Start each category on a new page.
- 10. -Write on only one side of the paper.
- 11. Write "Last Page" on the last answer sheet.
7 L
l
. 1 L
- 12. Number each answer to correspond with the question, for example:
1.4, 6.3.
- 13. Skip at least three lines between each answer.
14 Separate completed answer sheets from the pad and place them face down on your desk or tabic.
- 15. Use abbreviations only if they are commonly used in facility literature.
Avoid using symbols such as less than or greater than signs to avoid a simple transposition error resulting in an incorrect answer. Write it out.
- 16. The point value for each question is indicated in parentheses after the question. The amount of blank space on an examination question page is NOT an indication of the depth of answer required.
- 17. Show all calculations, methods, or assumptions used to obtain an answer and justify your answer for any short answer or essay questions, whether indicated in the question or not.
- 18. Partial credit may be given. Therefore, ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE QUESTION AND DO NOT LEAVE ANY ANSWER BLANK.
- 19. Proportional grading M 11 be applied to short answer or essay questions requesting a list. ig additional wrong information that is provided may count against you. For example, if a question is worth one point and asks for four responses, each of which is worth 0.25 points, and you give five responses, each of your responses will be worth 0.20 points.
If one of your five responses is incorrect. 0.20 will be deducted and your total credit for that question will be 0.80 instead of 1.00 even though you got the four correct answers.
20..
If the intent of a question is unclear, ask questions of the examiner only.
- 21. When you complete your exsmination, you shall:
a.
Assemble your examination as follows:
(1) Examination questions on top.
(?) Examination aids - figures, tables, etc.
(3) Answer pages including figures which are part of the answer.
b.
Turn in your examination and all pages used to answer the examination questions.
c.
Turn in all scrap paper and the balance of the paper that you did not use for answering the questions, i
l
p ng,.
c
- ,a n<
0.,
T
~
,,f n-r n, _
. 3..-
ia
- i.
,\\-
L'O',
' +'
(t.,'.
'd. :
When you are'done and have tu'rned in 'your examination, leave;the -
i-j.,
examination area (DEFINE THE AREA)._ =If you are found.in this area 1 W
while.the txamination is still in progress, your. license may be-idenied or' revoked.
f 'i 7^
t 4
}
,-10; pg, gu m
p r
t.
r f
W
\\
p.,-.
fUi w.
n l
_g
,t.
,4-'
- e
.,.; s
.. _ f.l4
+
g 4
,3
') a i-c.
,.4.
3
't 4ji u
'?
r q
,-i b
7 g.
5
~
71
'-.f. '
l I.;
e
7 7
l i
i ENCLOSURE 4 i
REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITY REVIEW 0F KRITTEN EXAMINATIONS 1
1.
At the option of the Chief Examiner, the facility may review the written i
examination up to two weeks prior to its administration. This review may
[
take place at the facility or in the Regional office. The Chief Examiner will coordinate the details of the review with the facility.
l I
F Whenever this option of examination review is utilized, the facility reviewers shall sign the following statement prior to being allowed access to the examination:
h a.
Preexamination Security Agreement i-I,,
, agree that ! will not knowin any "information concerning the replacement (or initial) gly divulge e
examination L
scheduled for to 'any unauthorized persons.
I understand that I am not to participate in any instruction involving i
those reactor operttor or senior reactor operator applicants scheduledtobeadministeredtheabovereplacement(orinitial) l examination from now until after the examination has been administered.
i Signature /Date In addition, the facility staff reviewers will sign the following statement after the written examination has been administered:
b.
Postexamination Security Agreement knowledge, divulge any informatTo'n, did not, to the best of my I,
concerning the written examination administered on to any unauthorized persons.
t I did not participate in providing any instruction to those reactor.
operator and senior reactor operator applicants who were administered the examination from the time that I was allowed access to the examination.
51gnature/Date t
4
-?-
2.
Regardless vf whether the above examination review option is exercised, g
immediately following the administration of the written examination, the facility will be provided a copy of the examination with all changes that were made during the examination administration for their review.
If the facility did not review the examination prior to its administration, L
they will have five (5) working days from the day of the written examination L
to submit formal comments.
If the f acility reviewed the examination prior to its administration, any additional comments must be given to an examiner prior to his/her leaving the site at the end of the week of the written examination administration.
In either case, the coments will be addressed to the responsible Regional office by the highest level of corporate management for plant operations, e.g., Vice President for Nuclear Operations.
A copy of the submittal will be forwarded to the Chief Examiner, as appropriate. Comments not submitted within the required time frame will be considered for inclusion in the grading process on a case-by-case basis by the Regional Office Section Chief. Should the comment submittal deadline not be met, a long delay in grading the examinations may occur.
3.
The following format should be adhered to for submittal of specific comments:
a.
Listing of HRC que: tion, answer and reference b.
Facility comment / recommendation c.-
Reference (to support facility comment) c NOTES:
1.
No change to the examination will be made without submittal of a reference to support the facility comment. Any supporting documentation that was not previously suppliec', should be provided.
-2.
Coments made without a concise facility recommendation will not be addressed.
,