ML20011A271

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Evaluation of SEP Topic II-4.D,stability of Slopes
ML20011A271
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/1981
From: Vincent R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TASK-02-04.D, TASK-2-4.D, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8110080408
Download: ML20011A271 (3)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _. _ _ _ _ 4 ' Consumers Power Company General Offices: 212 West Michleen Avenue, Jackson, MI 49201 *(5171 788-0550 i [ October 5,1981 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation Att Mr Dennis M Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No 5 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 205 M DOCKET 50-155 - LICDiSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT - SEP TOPIC II-h.D, STABILITY OF SLOPES Attached is Consumers Power Company's evaluation of SEP Topic II-h.D for Big Rock Point. (jT Robert A Vincent Staff Licensing Er.gineer CC Director, Region III, USHRC NRC Resident Inspector - Big Rock Point o3f j S I( x 0110080408 811005 PDR ADOCK 05000155 p PDR i-

9.. ERC 20-81 <+ 9/23/81 Document Control Tho-99*12 BIG ROCK POINT' TOPIC II-h.D Stability of Slopes Introduction The objective of this topic is to assure that all safety-related structures, systems and components are adequately protected against the failure of natural or man-made slopes. Current Review Criteria l The current review criteria for this specific safety topic are: NAVFAC DM-7 SRP 2.5.5 Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 100 Letter, Crutchfield to SEP owners dated 8/5/81, Guidance for the Assessment of SEP Topics II h.D Stability of Slopes, etc. Related Safety Topics and Interfaces None Evaluation There are no significant natural or man-made slopes on this site. As shczn in the refe cences below, the site and the matching terrain surrounding the site for several miles contains gently sloping, partly vooded land with no significant topographic features. Conclusion Based on the information provided in the referencec and the evaluation stated above, we conclude that SEP safety Topic II-h.D needs no further consideration. References

1) Big Rock Point Plant Site Plan - Bechtel Drawing 3159 C-3 (CP Co Drawing O7h0G20003).
2) Final Hazards Su==ary Report for Big Rock Point Plant, Volume 1, November 1k,1961.

-(Section 2.2, Immediate Environs)

.s l a .m g[%. uII W f ..~g N l.' +.- y b . I p, \\ I, w ',...u. 5 .r u a <a, ig j P-i l *l N

3,.

1,

;g;[in, 3

./ 1 Et i lt f! g 7 t' 8 ~ ~ i 'ii

  • l
  1. f.:!!

,l* / , i. i 4.- \\ '. ? '.u.. 8 )E-g. s .7, :-

. - - $,.y

.,i g

  • g g ;,g

\\, g' ; ,' ;;T 3.csr:p.a.. r.i,'%1j a m '..r

j y

4 t-1 o [ i ji g i s t, .m a g i s i A, .: k.,.T.E.m.ii l %q, n. c. .j I -2 1 i 6 l I.l 'I h< j 8/i l..) r j-8,, .n. n ~ li i sh dt!.;3 h; p,ii'sg

y V

[ S'M : l@h..$[. i[!ll!!{ 11111 : g Ih .I a a{ u.. f p! I '/ i a t1 D G' / i h G. f; R li ,y: y/ e -9 1 l l i \\ N, ji .i I s 1 \\ s b .n \\ i., - i g i : j c g s 4 t. ,4 ,4 s p[ /if - i 3 l i s 5 ). '- s s , -2 I1 i I f i-f. if -1. : t !L t' d c; ', i,1 1 o ; e ( g'f . / f.h,y','l: i = r\\ &"g l 4 EI 1 %l l \\

ag:

s

y;

.\\ \\ i ~ \\ D' ! !I wl )NT sk'.. l 5 !' e \\ >1 L/ ..nM >g, v. i r i tr+ = i ex g O)/ l)I i. \\ $ .[ g j.. ' ' s. -1 / G } -. - \\ ... t' :. y. ~ g!c- - /, 'c E ',;, r,... N-1.y [L. l i Fi i s. ~ <: d' l Mq1-{o,%wy'~.gC'M 'il (T / .]' <, $d:it :.J...N. ~

i O-id i

r, .t ss s l..,\\ g

m "d b
p I! t 8r

- Q, I o A a;:gf- .. - opm 3 u !g<i,g ig %>j. s i. 7'.- x . \\. p' dij. f t 1 \\ ,i d i : 1..} .. G, ; j)f - irir ni M'f B~.,s.T i i ~ /. v.

s c t,.

3pg ,s< .,h,.mru: 7 1 iL e. i s.. ~. ... i iaq i N.. ~. '- N;) , < ~ s. i }

9

's s i 4 - i 4.et: s c. s

  • l!

Hll. /-~ t lI... l '*,,! I j s. l g I J i l ' l.' t: f -~..--. - l l j,,, r -. .i p. ./ l e ,/' ' / .t g ,,,.... " * " I y; .s.- I '. J././*** ~*,.. z.G'/ ...,-*.~~../

,/ l,

/ l. l : ,,./. ,n. y,! ll ~ - - a ./,. - -, .. ' 4.-8.~.. l .ef, (.....: '.. / i ? i /, .... - +

  • i 'i.. '.

'. t : ., t.

  • 7.

/, l p. l \\. ! ,I - y m _ _ _ _ _ _}}