ML20010J416
| ML20010J416 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1981 |
| From: | Williams J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | John Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8110050006 | |
| Download: ML20010J416 (6) | |
Text
.
,c O{ @
g3 SEP 2 31981 d
Docket Nos. 50-461/462
,Qt > D1(
,,\\
My MEMORANDUM FOR: James R. Miller, Chief I
Standardization & Special Projects Branch 4'
gEP3 0 g Division of Licensing, NRR 5
" D8 FROM:
J. H. Williams, Project Manager Standardization & Special Projects Branch f
Division of Licensing, NRR k
SUBJECT:
FORTHCOMING HEETING WITH ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY DATE & TIME:
September 29-October 1,1931 9:00 AM LOCATION:
September 29, 1981 - Visitors Center September 30-October 1,1981 - Illinois Power Offices in Decatur PURPOSE:
Review applicant's organization for nuclear plant operation PARTICIPANTS:
NRC IPC M. ;iolzmer G. Wuller, et. al.
K. Baker M G M SIGNgony, J. H. Williams, Project Mangger Standardization & Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Agenda cc: See next page 8110050006 810923' i
PDR ADOCK 05000461)
PDR lf [j/
I
]
l/
...S S,P,B,: 0,L,h<ch,P,B,j,h(,,,,,
or,,ce>
suR m e>.. JHW i.ll.i.ams.: g.a b,',g,R,Mjll,er
.. 91...#.La,1..,,,,,,,)/,,,3;/,8.1..,
j om>
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM Cao OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usom mi_u.. -
MEETING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION Docket File I&E Region I NRC PDR I&E Regina II Local PDR I&E Region III SSPB Rdg.
I&E Region IV TERA I&E Region V NSIC NRC Participants TIC Project Manager E. Case
- J. R. Miller D.- Eisenhut/R. Purple L. Tremper N. Hughes T. Novak S. Varga T. Ippolito R. A. Clark 4
J. Stol z R. Tedesco B. Youngblood A. Schwencer F. Miraglia E. Adensam G. Lainas D. Crutchfield B. Russell J. 01shinski R. Vollmer R. Mattson S. Hanauer T. Murley J. Knight W. Johnston D. Muller P. Check W. Kreger L. Rubenstein F. Schroeder M. Ernst ACRS (16)
I&E (3)
OSD (7)
OELD J. LeDoux V. Moore B. Grimes 3
m.
, - -.. ~. -
T ~
t-e
. ;2
... _.,_ _._a _... _.
_ ~.
a w. 4 :.. _ J,._
%;q%p
- i... ~
s MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY FOR THE CLINTON PLANT Overall Objective: Review the proposed organization for operation of the Clinton Plant from the level of the senior corporate officer who will be in overall charge of nuclear operations down to-the proposed operating staff at the plant.
To accomplish this objective the review team will wish to spend time at the plant and the corporate office.
Our past practice has beer. to start the review with a thorough briefing by the utility on the pr ed (or actual) organization, followed by in-depth s
discussions with selected f.ndividuals at the plant and in the corpcrate office, sufficient to gain a feeling for the qua)ifications and attitude of the individuals and an understanding of how they actually fit into the operation.
Our prime interest is to gain cssurance that the corporate management is involved with, informed about, and dedicated to the safe operation of the nuclear plant and that sufficient technical resources have been or will be provided to adequately support safe plant operation.
Specific Matters to be Covered:
1.
Overall corporate organization, showing how the nuclear portion fits in to the rest of the utility's operations. Relation of the senior
- corporate officer with nuclear responsibility to other corporate officials. Responsibility and authority of cenior corporate officer in charge of nuclear operations.
2.
Corporate level support to be provided to support plant operation.
Where located? If not under direct control of senior nuclear officer, how is support obtained? Number and qualifications of technical sup-port personnel? How organized? Relations between corporate support elements and' plant staff? Training of personnel? Experience of sup-port personnel with contemporary nuclear power plants.
Changes in staffing level with time.
3.
We will need to gain an understanding of how the proposed organization for operation compares with the organization that is and has been in effect during the plant construction, with emphasis on changes that have been cr will be made to strengthen the organization, and the provisions for maintaining and transferring the plant knowledge gain-ed in the design and construction phase to the operating organization (home office and plant staff).
4.
The involvement of the home office and plant staff in the preopera-tional testing and startup testing programs.
s g
r 3
+m w
n
,t
.,r 7..,
- q?..
5.
The experience level and manpower availability to implement the ini-tial test program. Their education, training and experience require-ments.
Initial test program procedure development, review, approval' and adherence.
6.
The Engineer in' charge, his fiscal and personnel budgets, hie level of independence, authority and responsibility, and collateral duties.
7.
The Corporate. Fire Protection' Engineer, Plant Fire Protection Offfcer, and Corporate Training Manager; their educational background, exper-ience, authority and responsibilities.
8..
For the plant staff, we need to determine the operating organization and how it interacts to assure safe plant operation. Number and qualifications of technical support personnel sad maintenance person-nel? What provisions will be made for security and the fire brigade?
. Proposed shift staffing? Numbers and qualifications per shift? How many shifts? Experience of plant personnel in the operation and main-tenance of contemporary nuclear power plants. Training provisions for.both licensed and unlicensed personnel? How many now in training?
Future intentions?
9.
Proposed QA organization for operation? Relation to-plant staff?
Where does it report? Access to corporate level personnel?
10.
Training program schedules for plant personnel; program reviews; course updates for design, procedure and facility changes; course description and requirements for training on mitigation of core dam-
, age, and STA training.
11.
Intent regarding safety review of plant operations? On-site review?
Corporate review and audit? Provisions for Independent Safety Engineer-ing Group?
12.
Plans for meeting (and procedures if aveilable) for meeting the following Task Action Plant Items:
a.
l.A.l.1 - Shift Technic.
Advisors Provisions to be made for Shift Technical Advisors. How ob-tained? Qualifications? Reporting channels? Relations to shift staff?
b.
l.A.l.2 - Shift Supervisor Administrative Duties Provisions for relieving the Shift Supervisor of administrative duties.
m~
<=.
4 _..
~
..;df '
v
- +' c.
- 1. A.l.3 - Shif t Mannit g See Item 8 above; numbers of operators in training programs at present and for the near future. Procedure to limit maximum working hours.
d.
l.A.2.1 - Training and Qualifications of Operating Personnel Provisions to be made for the immediate upgrading of Operator and Senior Operator training and qualifications.
k.
1.B.l.2 - Independent Safety Engineering Group Provisions for the Independent Safety Engineering Group, f.
1.C.2 - Shift Relief and Turnover Procedures Provisions for adequate shift relief and turnover.
g.
1.C.3 - Shift Supervisor Responsibilities Responsibilities and authority of shift supervisor. Plans for procedures delineating functions and authority, h.
1.C.4 - Control Room Access Procedure for limiting access to the control room.
- i.
1.C.5 - Procedure for Feedback of (ferating Experience to the Plant Staff Plans and procedures for evaluation and feedback of operating experience. How is information obtained? Whc,or which group performs evaluation? How is information disseminated? To whom?
Checks to assure it has reached appropriate parties at plant and corporate levels?
j.
1.C.6 - Guidance on Procedures for Verifying Correct Performance at Operating Activities k.
NUREG-0654 - Emergency Planning (organization aspects)
Preparation and guidelines for Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
1.
10'CFR 50.48 - Fire Protection Plan r
- 6
- ;
.g.. e '
t-c,.
.., =
~.r:.
s e
-4
. r-E Fire Protection Program onsite and Corporate Organizations, Fire Brigade Organization, Plant Staff and Fir Brigade Training, and Administrative Controls.
- $ ~
m J
n e
i e
i 7
L a
1 f
O h.-
,1 I
4 1
e
+
t 8
I
.-.-4
,%.m
-~,
e