ML20010J300
| ML20010J300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1981 |
| From: | Futter J, Latham S, Shulman H LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION, TWOMEY, LATHAM & SHEA |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 81-3044, NUDOCS 8109300279 | |
| Download: ML20010J300 (3) | |
Text
,. v a h h'.,5..^ N.
L
- n...
-n-., n : ~. -
2.;u w ";.
~.wa-uta fQ. ~ r m% e w y' - C2ir., k?.5K;:'ISS-E S 2l:*
- W&k5553h -
~ Yn" '
""n?
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEI.ATED CORRESPONDENC:'
I POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT U
tI-M PROD.& UTIL FAC.g j g
..---------x t
h i ( :
~
SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION, h /
t-
/. S y.,. ' I!
a 2
[5 A
" = +. -
5 Q%
Petitioner, STIPULATION FOR
-against-WITHDRAWAL OP THE PETITION THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, HAROLD DENTON AS THE DIRECTOR OF No.81-304 g. p6' h NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION, AND
' IM
^
THE LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, N"
Respondents.
f# (
SEP 1 b190I
( !...a h.., p-rf
x NifCONO ct.;cd >;
m IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned attorneys for the parties herein, that on July 22, 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a final order granting petiticrner a hearing, subject to petitioner advancing one litigable contention, under Section 189(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended on the application of the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) for an extension to the construction permit for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant; and that the Director i
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation issued a decision in response to l
petitioner's applications pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.206 on June 9.6, 1981, and that that decision became a final NRC order on August 6, 1981; l
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGFEED that the above described final NRC actions are among those which petitioner in this i
litigation $>
-to cornpel the NRC to take; M
f @R lecxoso '
/
C h
e%y (
SEP2 5198f Aq 0
EP29gggIU y:
p4 I
f0
\\
{e erw e e,w q }MW w
'%.,,, gm M
M N
0109300279 8109i'O M
PDR ADOCK 05000322 4/
4~ h w= n t*\\ \\
PDRr O
l l
9 r
3 ll
'.l El AND IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that petitioner may h
voluntarily withdraw its petition herein without prejudice and d
',5 without costs to any party.
5 0
'ft' 3
d rve ~
u man L
Spe al Assistant to the General Counsel 1
U.S.
Nuclear Regul'atcJ v Commission y
Washington, D.C. 20555 (202) 492-7000
,1 9AGM_
j Jef'frey IFutter Attorney for Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 (516) 228-2038
_[ -_..
+
Ob)%
'JL
~
S t eph en,'B. Latham
~
Twomey, Latham & Schmitt Attorneys for
.i Shoreham opponents Coalition P.O.
Box 398, 33 West Second Street Riverhead, New York 11901 (516) 727-2180
~5c M.%"O September 18, 1981 J'
N sL:
l x_J ' t-:
.iy.'s.r.r.
(A true copy, MtD GP>O m.-,
g3y2Nd'Y '.$$WifQ C y[.q;(f$ f.p h h~
~2.-)[i k d h h,7-I M Y
-.E
%[Affi[6Mf
~
't'~
y*S;;.yQry L-r;f 7
f.'
$
- f y & *%'; ' :
y
:smiGy" L.
?>; 2 y'
. &,. -.n n %.% v p'.. t d %y f q g ;,i'
's :
-mW
?.v*
d.%'f;~
f
,y jk >.;f
' ~* ' RNyy, Q h'PM wsq{dgiIlh _
b5$,$'
5?
h~'l&.$kbli.$^'
bkh
.N
\\
,,_ p<p_ fia ' ??rs*e,.2Og_.MM "
f iN.*
w'^
w i+ =
,m...
s f';.r>& T-s Y
_ M i;*C'Ti gg_wm pum :-tG.
g
'gggg
- i m
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
x
/^%
/ Q_
/
l' N, i,g /
SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COAL'.' TION, 3
/
7
'*. ~, ' '.
f Petitioner, STIPULATION FOR
-against-WITHDRAWAL OF THE PETITION THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, HAROLD DENTON AS THE DIRECTOR OF No.81-304 _ g gh p0F h NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION, AND
/ M.M YU 4'T THE LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY,
//M}
i
(
EP 1 O I901 d
I Respondents.
b.l.Q_~l
%Q.*lD C1&S
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned attorneys for the parties herein, that on July 22, 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a final order granting petitioner a hearing, subject to petitioner advancing one litigable contention, under Section 189(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended on the application ot the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) for an extension to the construction permit for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant; and that the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation issued a decision in response to petitioner's applications pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 2.206 on June 7.6, 1981, and that that decision became a final NRC order on August 6, 1981; IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above described final NRC actions are among those which petitioner in this litigation sought to compel the NRC to take; The mandate, consisting of the items checked below, has been received.
/ J opinion l
/\\/
order
/
/
statement of costs
-