ML20010G208
| ML20010G208 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1981 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8109150440 | |
| Download: ML20010G208 (2) | |
Text
). o u
g
($
- TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANoOG A TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street 'Ibwer II September 4, 1981 YCRD-50-566/81-02
=
~.
YCRD-50-567/81-02 mg 7
'T
{
Eb Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director
/ '9 f
W f4 Office of Inspection and Enforcement 2 S[p
.)
j iISS A -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission 6fJ u,g k g Region II - Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303
/
N
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
YELIG CREEX NUCLEAR PIRTP UNITS 1 AND 2 - SOURCE INSPECTION -
YCRD-50-566/81-02, YCRD-50-567/81-02
'nIIRD INTERIM REPORT
'Ihe subject deficiency was initially reported to NIC-OIE Inspector M. 'Ihamas on January 20, 1981 in accordm with 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) as ICR YCN QAB 8101. ' Itis was followed by our interim reports dated February 19, and June 23, 1981. Enclosed is our third interim report. We expect to subnit our next report by December 8,1981.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with D. L. Lanbert at FTS 857-2581.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AtmIORITI M.Mib.s, Manager Nucle &r Regulation and Safety h
Enclosure cc: Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Director (Enclosure)
Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccanission Washington, DC 20555 f
8109)50440 810904 II /
PDR ADOCK 05000566 I
S PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer
o e
e FNCIDSURE YEIEW CREEX NUCIEAR PIRFP UNITS 1 AND 2 SOUICE INSPECTICH YCRD-50-566/81-02, YCRD-50-567/81-02 10 CFR 50.55(e)
'IEIrT) INPERIM REPORP Description of Deficiency on four separate occasions between June and December 1980, employees of TVA's Division of Construction discovered defects in welds by visual enmination after the subject material had been released from the vendor shop by TVA's source inspectors.
L All of the four occasions were handled as individual nonconformance reports (NCR's). 'Ihe specific safety implication of each NCR will be addressed in that manner. However, this NCR was written to address the generic l
implications associated with a breakdcwn in the quality system at the source inspection level.
Interim Progress TVA is scheduling a special team of Quality Engineering Branch employees to survey each site for the purpose of:
1.
Reviewing weld defects associated with vendor-supplied equipment, 2.
Determining the cause or reason the defects were not discovered by source inspection, and 3.
Developing appropriate corrective actions.
ll 1
4 d
..--.~m,
., ~. _ _ _ -... -
...-._.,.._,_,,.m..___,..-__
._