ML20010G170
| ML20010G170 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | Lundvall A BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010G164 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8109150402 | |
| Download: ML20010G170 (4) | |
Text
u 4
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P.O. BOX 1475 BALTIMOPE, MARYLAND 21203 AmrHum E. LUNDVALL. JR.
ViCC PRESaDENT sumv August 31, 1981 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Pruse.ta, PA 19406 ATTENTION:
R. R. Keimig, Chief Projects Branch #2, Division of Resident and Project Inspection Gentlemen:
This refers to your Inspection Report 50-317/81-11; 50-318/81-11, which transmitted two items of apparent noncompliance with NRC requirements.
Enclosure (1) to this letter is a written state-ment in reply to those items. Additionally, the actions to improve our management control systems are the same as the measures identified in our response to Item A of Appendix A, inspection Report 50-317/81-11; 50-318/81-11.
Should you have further questions regarding this reply, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours, i
l
,, _ _ _/ w s _
7 Vice President - Supply
{
AEL/DWL/gla Enclesure (1) l l
t i
l 8109150402 810909 PDR ADOCK 05000317 l
O PDR L
a R. R. Keinig 2
August 31, 1981 STATE OF MARYLAND:
TO WIT:
CITY OF BALTIMORE:
Arthur E. Lundvall, Jr., being duly sworn states that he is Vice President of the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, a corporation of the State of Maryland; that he provides the toregoing response for the purposes therein set forth; that the statements made are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, informs, tion, and belief; and that he was authorized to provide the response on behalf of said Cor oration.
WITNESS my Hand and Notarial Seal.
Notary Public My Commission Expires:
.1,[4f /f )f,h,2,
.?
(pr Copy to:
J. A. Biddison, Esquire G. F. Trowbridge, Esaaire Director, Office of Inspection & Enforcement R. E. Architzel, NRC Resident Inspector
s l
e 1
ENCLOSURE (1) 4 REPLY TO APPENDIX A OF NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-317/81-11; 50-318/81-11 l
j ITEM A As stated in your Inspection Report, Technical Specification 3.3.3.6 3
j was amended cn May 27, 1981, to allow continued operation until i
June i, 1981, with one acoustic mr..itor inoperable. The inoperable accustic monitor was repaired and returned to service on May 29, 1981.
We have been in full compliance since Technical Specification 3.3.3.6 was amended.
In order to prevent similar occurrence in the future, we will implement the following:
1.
Issue a change to Calvert Cliffs Instruction-200, Maintenance Requests, making it mandatory to use deficiency tags to identify inoperable equipment.
2.
Develop a maintenance request status system such that the Shift Supervisor is able to obtain a listing of all inoperable equipment at any time.
3.
Formalize an administrative procedure to ensure appropriate implementation of approved Technical Specification changes.
Item 1 and 3 above will be completed by November 30, 1981.
Item 2 above is under development wich implementation expected by July 1,1982.
ITEM B As stated in your. Inspection Re? ort, the NRC Operations Center was notified two hours and thirty-five minutes after the discovery of extended inoper-ability of one acoustic monitor on May 27, 1981. This delay in notification was due to an oversight by the General Supervisor-Operations (GS-0),
who was attempting to establish contact with both the NRC Resident Inspector and the NRC Project Manager to resolve the question of monitor inoperability prior to the expiration of the time period allowed by Technical Specification 3.0.3.
Operating shift personnel were not notified of the acoustic monitor inoperability until approximately 1630 on May 27, 1981, at which time they were directed by the GS-0 to initiate shutdown and notify the NRC Operations Center. The Shift Supervisor initiated these actions within five minutes of the GS-O's direction.
A ENCLOSURE (1)
REPLY TO APPENDIX A 0F NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-317/81-11; 5G-318/81-11 ITE}! B gCONTINUED)
Existing administrative controls for insuring compliance with the require-ments of 10 CFR 50.72 have been reviewed and have been deternined to be adequate. This failure to report within the required tima period is considered to be an isolated case of oversight by a single indiv4. dual.
Therefore, no further corrective action to prevent recurrence is considered necessary.