ML20010F957

Application to Amend Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7 Supplementing 810701 Application to Change Tech Specs Re Inservice Surveillance Requirements for Snubbers.No Addl Amend Fee Required

ML20010F957
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	09/10/1981
From:	Leasburg R VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20010F958	List: ML20010F957 ML20010F959 ML20010F964
References
520, NUDOCS 8109150159
Download: ML20010F957 (4)

Text

r-e 4 g . \ .tts ,

[ f F k /

VINUINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY g*" .

1. !\

• i Ricuxoxn,VinotNEA 202G1 t SEP 15 Iggy :.g September 10, 1981

\

n. u. i.u . : v/

v... n - ...

m ... ......... , g@9 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 520 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N0/WRM:acm Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket Nos. 50-338 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 50-339 Division of Licensing License Nos. NPF-4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NPF-7 Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSES NPF-4 AND NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE By a letter dated July 1, 1981 (Seris?. No. 293), the Virginia Electric and Power Company requested an amendment te Operating Licenses NPF-4 and hrF-7 for North Anna Power Station, Units No. I and No. 2. The proposed changes enclosed supplement cur license amendment application dated July 1, 1981.

In a letter from Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut dated November 20, 1980, all power reactor licensees were requested to incorporate revised inservice surveillance requirements for snubbers into their Technical Specifications. Further review i

of snubber technical information has better defined the technical and opera-

. tional considerations upon which our July 1, 1981 license amendment applica-l tion was based. The supplemental changes to the Technical Specifications for l North Anna Unit I and Unit 2, which are the result of this additional review, j are provided in Attachment I and Attachment 2, respectively. A discussion of l the proposed supplemental changes for Unit I and Unit 2 is provided in Attach-ment 3.

This request has been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety end Operating Committee and by the Safety Evaluation and Control Staff. It has been determined that this request does not involve an unreviewed safety question.

We have evaluated this request in accordance with the criteria in 10 CFR 170.22. Since this request supplements our previously submitted license amendment application, no additiona? Ticense amendment fee is required.

Very trul ynurs, R. H. Leasburg

()O 8109150159 810910 DR ADOCK 05000 i

Via01MIA ELEctalC AND POWEn COMPANY TO Harold R. Denton Attachments:

1. Supplement to Proposed Technical Specification Change - Unit 1

2. Supplement to Proposed Technical Specification Change - Unit 2

3. Discussion of Proposed Supplemental Technical Specification Change cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region Il e

t C

t 4

C0!9fCNWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )

)

CITY OF RICHMOND )

The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the City and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by 2. H. Lea-burg, who is Vice President-Nuclear Operations, of the Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the 3 statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Acknowledged before me this /6 day of p[- , 19 2/ .

My Commission expires: ,7 J /- , 19 9 f .

l Notary Public l

l (SEAL)

4 i

ATTACHMENT 1 SUPPLEMENT TO PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHAtlGE UNIT 1 I

i l

l l

[

.