ML20010C571

First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Directed to Util.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence

ML20010C571
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	08/14/1981
From:	Reynolds J CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, JOINT INTERVENORS - DIABLO CANYON
To:	PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8108200203
Download: ML20010C571 (14)

Text

e a- ..

m 1 4; t .

4T Sw hhk Y as. a. - .< .< . a 4 .

{%

,/ v 1,\

h g, N'y

.:f <= \

UNITED STATES OF AMERF~A n g g 081 >, ,ajy.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O. h 4' '

.?

(U' BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD N,'5

'ggg- j

)

In the Matter of '

)

)

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-275 O L.-

(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power ) 323 0.L.

)

Plant, Units 1 and 2) )

)

')

a V k i-3.h JOINT INTERVENORS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIdS @b AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO g?')_ '

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY V/ '

~ '

~ d, I. Interrogatories i

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 82.740(b), the SAN LUIS OBISPO 4

MOTilERS FOR PEACE, SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INC., ECOLOGY ACTION CLUB, SANDRA SIL'IER, GORDON SILVER, t

ELIZABETH APPELBFPG, and JOHN J. FORSTER

(" Joint Intervenors") 1 hereby request that tua attached interrogatories ba. answered fully, in writing, and under oath by any officers or employees of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (" Applicant") who have 6 personal knowledge thereof.

The answer to each interrogatory I t

should contain the name(s) and identification of the person (s)

{

supplying the answer whether or not he or she has verified the answer.

po3

~

E

'.8108200203 81001'4, PDR ADOCK 05000275 l} 'T g PDR 5

s

i.. .

i-The term " document" as used herein means the original or copy of any kind of written, typewritten, printed or recorded material whatsoever, including, but not limited to, notes, transcriptions of notes, memoranda, letters, speeches, press releases, newspapers and magazine. articles, editorials, telegrams, or other correspondence, publications, work sheets, recordings, studies, analyses, supplements, opinions, books, reports, transcriptions of recordings, information retrievable from computers, pictures, drawings, photographs or other graphic representations, or other records, relating to or pertaining in any way to the subject matter to which each interrogatory refers.

Each question is to be answered in 4 parts as follous:

A. Provide the direct answer to the question.

B. Identify all documents and studies, and the partic-ulars thereof, relied upon by the Applicant now or in the past, which serve as the basis for the answer.

In lieu thereof, at Applicant's option, a copy of such document and study may be attached to the answer.

C. Explain whether the Applicant and/or any independent contractor are presently engaged in or intend to l

engage in further research or work which may bear l on the issues covered in the interrogatory. If so, i

please identify such research or work and the person (s) responsible therefor. ,

'L . - - .. . .

y..

.p p * '

D.. (1) _ Identify; the ~ expert (s) , : if . any, whom : the

' ~

Applicant! intends to have testify on the. subject:

i matter covered in the interrogatory. ." State the (qualifications of each such-expert. (2) Present

, a summary of each' expert's proposed testimony on 1 L

~

! Joint Intervenors' contention.l. (3) Identify all.

cases-in which any such expert'has previously testified and state.the' subject' matter'of such testimony. -

t

1. Explain the present Applicant position on Joint Intervenors' contention 1, regarding emergency response planning.

2. .Does the-current ~ position differ from the position

i. of the Applicant in any prior proceedings? If so, I

identify the proceeding (s) , explain the: prior position, and explain the basic for the change in I

position.

3. Identify any officers or employees of, or consultants to, the Applicant who dissent from the present-6 Applicant position on Joint Intervenors' contention 1.

Explain the reasons for which any such person dissents.

4. Identify the specific sections and page numbers of-the PSAR for Diablo Canyon and the NRC Staff's SER l- and SER Supplements for Diablo Canyon, which are relied upon in farmulating the Applicant ~ position on Joint Intervenors' contention 1.

b_.-

.g ___. -

~x.

L 6:

v .

'5.. IdentifyLall: sections.and page' numbers.of the FSAR, A. ..

SER,Tand.SER Supplements'which contain subject matter pertaining to Joint Intervenors' contention-1.

6.. Does the: Applicant contend that'the Applicant, state, andolocall emergency response plans for Diablo Canyon-

~

as they.are presently constituted. comply with the Commission's revised. emergency planning regulations, effective November 3,-1980 ("Finai Regulations on Emergency Plannir.g , "~ 4 5 Fed. Reg. 55402 (August 19,

~

i r

1980))?

7 If.the answ'er to interrogacory 6 is yes,Lspecify each.and every_ fact supporting that answer.

l- 8. If the answer to interrogatory 6 is no, doer the l Applicant = contend that the Commission's revised I.

L -emergency planning regulations need not be complied.

l.

with prior to issuance of a' full power license.at Diablo Canyon? Specify each and.every fact supporting the answer to this interrogatory.

9. If the answer to interrogatory 6 is no, using a section by section analysis explain how'and in what f-l sections the Applicant, state, and local emergency plans do not comply with the Cermission's revised.

emergency planning regulations.

10. Specify any and all revisions or changes to be made by the Applicant in the applicable emergency plans

~ referred to in Joint 1Intervenors' contention 1, and l

any and all actions which the Applicant intends to ,

I.

k. 1 ~, . _ j

i n. -

,j ,

~

bV[ v.

+

a::2

~take,zto' eliminate prior to;fullcpower_ operation =

-i a't'Diablo_ Canyon-anysdeficiencies in.those plans as theyfrelate to theLCommission's revised emergency planning regulations.

p -11. ~ Specify what, if any, deficiencies in.the Applicant, state and local,. emergency plans as they relate to -

the Commission's revised emergency-planning regulations will not be eliminated priorLto-full power-operation at DiabloLCanyor.. -

12. - With respect'to any of the deficiencies-specified in answer to interrogatory 11, explain'why they.are not significant1for Diablo Canyon and what interim actions-have been or will be taken to compensate for the deficiencies.

13. Specify precisely how, if at all, the Applicant, state, and local emergency plans for Diablo Canyon

~

[ consider, allow for, or~ describe the possible effects on the implementation of those emergency. plans of'a major earthquake which occurs simultaneously with, I or initiates, a radiological emergency ec Diablo-l l-Canyon.

14. If the answer to interrogatory 13 is no, will such.

consideration and informaticn be included in the relevant plans prior to full power operation at Diablo Canyon?

15 . . If the answer to interrogatory 13 is yes, .specify l

how such plans consider, allow - for, or ' describe ,

) _ _ _ .

m _ _ . - .

.pg -

- d 3

.g4; l

'the effects'on-the: implementation ofisuch plansLof

~

in_ earthquake greater than~the shutdosn earthquake

.("SSE") which-occurs simultaneously with,_or initiates, a radiclogica1' emergency at-Diablo 1 Canyon.-

16. 1Specify how and where, .if'at'all, the " Evacuation

~

Times Assessment for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant" (April 1980) (Voorhees and Assoc.) ' (1) .

~

considers-the complicating' effects of an earthquake'

~

on emergency evacuation and (2) describes precisely the extent of the increases in evacuation time which could result if such an' event were to occur.

I simultaneously with a. radiological emergency at.

Diablo Canyon.

17. Describe in detail what, if any, efforts the 4

Applicant has made or intends to.make prior to-full power operation to update and revisc (in accord with NUREG-0654) the letters of agreement i

set forth in Appendix 7 to its on site emergency plan. ,

18. Describe how the Applicant intendssto notify the public abcut appropriate protective actions which.

should L .aken:in the event of an emergency.

v Specify when-any proposed notification system'will-be fully operational and how long it will take to notify all persons within 10 miles of the reactor. ,

_4 , r- e m-. y - - . - . , - - - rr ,

m- m _

' I . < > q n; '

19. . Do'the: Applicant, state, and local' emergency-plans-

~[forlDiablo' Canyon contain the, actual w6rding.of emergency messagesfor.the standard format for

. detailed : initial and follow-up 1communicaticus?L HIf not,.why not?

.20. Describe.in detail the public information program or measures which-the Applicant intends to implement. >

~

to comply with 10 C.F.R. - 950.47 (o) (7) . When will that program or those measures be implemented?

21. Describe in detail how, if at all, the emergency.

~

response facilities for Diablo Canyon will not comply with the criteria set-forth in NUREG-0696, entitled " Functional Criteria-for Emergency Response Facilities, Final Report," prior to full power operation at Diablo Canyon.

22. Explain how the decision will be made whether to

order sheltering or evacuation during an atmospheric release of radioactivity. What factors will be considered in making the decision? What criteria 4

will be applied to decide when to evacuate as opposed to when to shelter?

23. Who will order the appropriate protective action for the public and on the basis of what information and criteria?

24. In endorsing the concept of EPZ planning guidance, Y I

the Commission stated "it is appropriate and' prudent d i

for emergency planning guidance to take into' ,

j i

f- )'

I l

l'

q

• - . ' , ~

.c; 'c ,

consideration-the' principal characteristics . ..

- of a spectrum'of design basis and core melt .

accidents." 044 Fed. Reg.:61123.(October 23,11979).

Explain how the-Diablo. Canyon emergency-response- '

~

plans ~in.cffect'at'the time of-full power operation will-consider the principal characteristics and t

effects;of a spectrum of core melt accidents'.

'2 5. Specify in detail what efforts, if any, the Applicant has made-to achievc coordination of its emergency. response organization with all officials renponsible for emergency-preparedness and response in. (a) Avila Beach, (b) Los Osos, (c) Montana de Oro State Park, -(d) Cayucos, (e) Pismo Beach, (f) Oceano, (g) Atascadero, (h) Arroyo Grande, (i) Morro Bay, (j) Nipomo, (k) Cambria, (1) Santa.

Maria, (m) Paso Robles , '(n) San Luis Obispo, and (o) local beaches and parks, including Pismo, '

Cayucos,-Morro Strand, and Atascadero.

26. Specify what efforts, if any, the Applicant has made l

to date to educate and inform the public within a 50 mile radius of Diablo Canyon regarding what medical facilities to contact in the event of radiation-related injury, what actions to take in the event of a radiological emergency, what'the risks-of operation of the reactor are, and wnat the evacuation routes are in the event of a radiological

- emergency. .

'k e r -

vn >- -m, w-v -<w -

• w -

- -y p .

~

27; l Describe._allicnergency_ preparedness drills and/or-;

Jexer'cises-!which1have been-conducted by the A'pplicant

'and/or local-andJstate officialscin which:the-northern evacuation route from the siteLhasLbeen utilized.

28.. Describe in detail'all available evacuation _ routes

'from Diablo1 Canyon in-the event both the main entrance to the plant'from-Avila Beach #and the northern ~ evacuation route through the Fiel'd' Ranch-are blocked.

II. Request for Production of Documen'ts-Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 62. 741, Joint: Intervenors hereby request that the documents described herein be produced for 7

inspection and copying at the' office of'the undersigned counsel, Center for Law in the Public Interest, 10203 Santa Monica Blvd.,

Los Angeles, California 90067, on or'before September 15,fl981',

unless another-time or location is agreed upon.

Each document is relevant to Joint Intervenor's- ,

- admitted contention 1,.regarding emergency response planning at Diablo Canyon. The term " document" as used herein is consistent with the definition set forth supra at 2.

1. All documents identified inLresponse to interroga-tories 1-28 supra.

2. -All documents in the possession, custody, or control of PG and E or its agents which relate to the December 16, 1980 letter from Tedesco to Furbush, Vi eA.t e + - . - , -ier n = % =

~

3}.c.; .

' 2 1;(:

entitled." Effects of Earthquakes ~on'Diablo: Canyon',

Units =1;and 27 Emergency Plans,",and'to the. request Econtaine'd therein.

3. .All-documents'in the possession, custody, or control-of1PGiand E or its agents which relaten to'the

~

November-3, 1980,NRC' memorandum from Grimes to McConnell entitled'" Request _for FEMA'AssistanceL to Review Effects of Earthquake land Volcanic Eruption on State / Local Emergency Plans," 'and to the request'

~

contained th'erein.

'4. All documents in the possession, custody, or control of PG and E or its age.:ts which : relate . to the subject -

of the possible effects of' earthquakes.on implemen-tation of the. Applicant,- state, and local emergency plans for Diablo Canyon, including, but not neces-sarily limited to, the effects on~~ communications,:

transportation routes, evacuation, provision of medical assistance, and notification'of PG and E personnel and the public generally.

5. All documents within the possession, custody, or control of PG and E or its agents which relate to establishment, development, or implementation of a public education and information program or other measures relevant to the requirement set forth at-10 C.F.R. 950.47 (b) (7) .

6. All correspondence andidocumente in the possession, custody,~or control of PG'and E or its agents ,

relating to efforts, if.hny, by PG and E orLits agents 2-

, , + . ~ . , . , , - - ,+ ,

-:m, to achieve c ' coordination with'allfofficials respon-

-siblejfor emergency preparedness'and response in the' cities,' areas,'and jurisdictionsflisted supra in-interrogatory-25.-

7. All documents.in the possession, custody, or control ^

of PG-and'Efor i.ts agents relating to off site preparedness at Diablo. Canyon, including all cor-L respondence and memoranda.between (1) PG and E er its agenta and FEMA and (2) PG and E or its agents-and the NRC, its staff, or its agents.

Dated: August 1 4 ,' 1981 Respectfully submitted, ,

JOllN R. PHILLIPS, ESQ.

JOEL R. REYNOLDS, ESQ.

Center for Law in the Public Interest 10203 Santa Monica Boulevard Fifth Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 (213) 879-5588 DAVID S. FLEISCllAKER , ESQ.

1735' Eye Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 638-6070 By p JOEL y KEYNOLDS Attorncys for Interuenors SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTliERS FOR PEACE SCENIC SHORELINE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE, INC.

ECOLOGY" ACTION CLUB SANDRA SILVER i --

GORDON SILVER ELIZABETil~APPELBERG JOllN J. FORSTER .

- - _ _ _ _ ~.

r. - - . . . . . - .

k ' s e

~ '

l'f 2 -ffn r j;.;; M y,,g, y g

' UNITED STA ES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR PEGULATORY-' COMMISSION-

~

BEFORE THE ATOMIC' SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD.

~

)-

In the Matter of )'.

)-

PACIFIC. GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY )- Docket Nos; ~ 50-275 cO.L. . -

)- 50-313,0,L.

(Diablo Canyon Nuclear. Power )

(Low Power Test. Proceeding).,

Plant, Units 1 and 2 )

)

)

-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 14th' day of-August, --

1981, I have' served copies of the foregoing JOINT-INTERVENORS? ,

FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQ' JEST FOR PRODUCTION OF.

DOCUMENTS TO PACIFIC - GAS AND EI.ECTRIC COMPANY, . mailing them through the U.S. mails, first class, postage prepaid. ,

~

G s

/

0  %,

13 \

U 'G: 71981 > $

'$o "

\ e:, t ::::.j [/-

. ,;.v:2 '

,- . ~t Y /

d D

=

i?

Docket & Service Branch Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 William Olmstead, Esq.

Richard S. Salzman, Marc R. Staenberg, Esq.

Chairman Edward G. Ketchen, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Office of the Executive Legal Appeal Board Director - BETH 042 7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. W. Reed Johnson Nancy Culver Atomic Safety & Licensing 192 Luneta Appeal Board San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Frederick Eissler

. Washington, D.C. 20555 Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.

Dr. John H. Buck 4623 More Mesa Drive

= Atomic Safety & Licensing Santa Barbara, CA 93105 h_ Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Sandra A. Silver Commission 1760 Alisal Street Washington, D.C. 20555 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Admin. Judge John F. Wolf, Gordon Silver Chairman 1760 Alisal Street Atomic Safety & Licensing San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory David S. Fleischaker, Esq.

Commission 1735 Eye Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20555 Hashington, D.C. 20006 Glcr.n O. Bright Bruce Norton, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing 3216 N. Third Street Board Suite 202 Y U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Phoenix, Arizona 85012 E Commission E Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Yale I. Jones, Esq.

100 Van Hess Avenue l$ Dr. Jerry R. Kline 19th Floor

_ Atomic Safety e. T,1 censing San Francisco, CA 94102 Bqard

.I U.S. Nuclear Begulatory Andrew Baldwin, Esq.

Commission Friends of the Ea;-th

= Washington, D.C. 20555 124 Spear Street San Francisco, CA 94105 m

f- ---

~

-Ilarry M. Willis, Esq.'

Mrs. Raye-Fleming Seymour and Willis: 1920 Mattie Road 601 California Street- 'Shell Beach',.CA 93449 Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94108' . MIIB Technical Associates'

.1723 Hamilton' Avenue Janice.E.-Kerr,'Esq.

Suite K'-

Lawrence Q. Garcia,'Esq. San.Jcse, CA.95125 J. Calvin Simpson, Esq.

California Public Utilities- Carl Nieburger_

Commission Telegram Tribune 5246 State Building P. O. Box-112 San Francisco,..CA 94102 San Luis Obispo, CA 93402 Malcolm H. Furbush, Esq. Byron Georgiu, Esq.

.Vice President and General Legal Affairs Secretary to

-Counsel the Governor -

Philip,A. Crane, Esq. State Capitol' Building Pacific Gas & Electric Company Sacramento,-CA 95814 P.O. Box 7442 San. Francisco, CA.94106 Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.

IIill, Christopher '& Phillips Arthur C. Gehr, Esq. -1900 M' Street,,N.W.

Snell & Wilmer Washington,'D.C. 20036

~ 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 w

)/'

OEL R./RDYNOLDS, ESQ.

_ . . _ . . - _