ML20010A336
| ML20010A336 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hartsville  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1981 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010A330 | List: |
| References | |
| HNP-SMR---9, HNP-SMR-9, NUDOCS 8108110328 | |
| Download: ML20010A336 (44) | |
Text
.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT RNP SMR - 9 September 30, 1980 Knoxville, Tennessee April 1981 S
8108110328 810730 PDR ADOCK 05000518 R
CONTENTS Page i
l Background and Highlights.
V l
I.
Cencral Status of Employment as of September 30, 1980..
1-II.
General Characteristics of Movers 3
III.
Secondary Employment 4
IV.
Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions 7
1 4
Tables J
Iable 1.
Estimates of Population and Population Change i
between April 30, 1976 - September 30, 1980.
6 Table 2.
School Systems' Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants Direct Impact Students 7
Table 3.
TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments 9
Table 4.
Traffic Evaluation 11 Table 5.
Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures as of September 30, 1980 15 Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results i
Table A-1.
Town of Current Residence.
19 Table A-2.
Source of Location of Construction Employees.
20 Table A-3.
Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community 22 Table A-4.
Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters.
23 Table A-5.
Mover Summary.
24 Table A-6.
Macon - Employees Living Within the County 25 Table A-7.
Smith - Employees Living Within the County 26 Table A-8.
Sumner - Employees Living Within the County 27 j
Table A-9.
Trousdale - Employees Living Within the County 28 Table A-10.
Wilson - Employees Living Within the County 29
[
t
,_m..
._...,m
l I
i CONTENTS (continued)
Table A-11.
Carthage - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
30 Table A-12.
Callatin - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
31 Table A-13.
Hartsville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
32 Table A-14.
Hendersonville - Employees Living Within 33 the City Limits.
Table A-15.
Lafayette - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
34 Table A-16.
Lebanon - Employees Living Within the City Limits.
35 Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Impact Monitoring of Hartsville Nuclear Plant Environmental Impact Area 36 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined 38 Appendix D - Employee Questionnaire.
39 Appendix E - Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle.
42 Exhibits Figure'l - Towns Containing Construction Employees 43 4
e
_HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT Background and Highlights In permits to construct the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Smith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVA agreed to undertake certain monitoring and mitigation actions co reduce the socioeconomic impact caused by the inmoving population for the construction project.
The impact area is defined as Irousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, and Wilson Counties, Tennessee. TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation I
actions taken to mitigate the impacts.
This is the ninth in a series of semiannual reports which TVA agreed to submit to the Nuclear Regulatory "ommission to report on the results of TVA's socioeconomic monitoring and mitigation efforcs for the Hartsville Nuclear Plants. This report is for the period April 1,1980, through Septemaer 30, 1980.
Employment dropped from 5,436 to 5,137 this period. Tha number of movers and population influx to Trousdale, Smith, and Wilson Counties l
was slightly lower than at the end of the previous reporting period.
Macon County gained 6 movers this period, with the total population influx increasing from 435 to 463. The mover rate was 33 percent for a total of 1,709 movers.
l TVA has made mitigation expenditures totaling approximately $7.7 million.
l Approxiuately $4 million of this amount was for employee transportation.
HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCI0 ECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT I.
General Status of Employment as of September 30, 1980 A survey of all TVA employees as of September 30, 1980, was conducted during January of 1981. The timelag between employment and survey enables employees who moved to make personal adjustments and should provide a better picture of employee distribution, family character-1 istics, and housing choice.
The employment had dropped to 5,137 employees, and information was available for 4,983 employees (97 percend.
Of those who provided information, 1,658 employees indicated they had novce Jor a mover rate of about 33 percent (table A-1).
Information on the family status and housing choice was obtained for those who moved (table A-5).
The data on movers have been extrapolated on a ratio basis to the total 5,137 employees which results in an estimated total number of movers of 1,709.
Of the total, 1,321 movers located in che five impact counties; and 388 moved to other counties. As shown in table A-1 and figure 1, local workers (nonmovers) are commuting to the project from a much more widespread area.
Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is found in tables A-1, A-2, and figure 1.
Additional information on the distribution and characteristics of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-18.
4 I Peak employment occurred the week of May 4, 1979, when total employment reached 6,996.
At one time a higher peak was expected af ter a substantial decline based on a revised schedule for Unit B.
Since that time Unit B has been indefinitely deferred; therefore, the likelihood of an ecployment level higher than the previous peak is unknown.
... Table A-1 lists the town of crirrent residence. This table is based on " Mailing Address" locations instead of jurisdictional locations.
All employees are asked to provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal limits.
Figure 1 is based on this table. Table A-3 provides the movers' distribution which is based on city limits for the five impact communities and any other communities to which at least 50 employees moved.
Table A-2 shows both the origin and location of all employees. The diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees.
For example, resident employees f rom Trousdale County would be found by locating Trousdale County in the "From" column and going across tae table to the "To" column which also reads Trousdale County.
In this survey 177 residents of Trousdale County were employed at the end of September 1980. Movers are shown by all other data in this table.
For example, seven employees moved from "Other Kentucky Counties" to Macon County.
Table A-4 of this report series contains a comparison of the survey results with the projections contained in the environmental impact statement (EIS).
For a work force of approximately 5,000 employees, 54 percent had been projected to be movers.
However, the survey found a mover rate of 33 percent.
Sumner County is still receiving the largest share of movers (30 percent) compared with the projected 20 percent. Macon County is receiving the smallest number of movers at 9 percent which is close to the projected 10 percent.
The mover rate to both Smith and TrousdaJe Counties is still much lower than projected. Smith County received only 11 percent
l 4 compared with the projected 20 percent, and Trousdale County received only 15 percent compared with the projected 30 percent..The mover rate to Wilson County renained low at 14 percent compared with the l
projected 20 percent. Although Sumner' County is'teceiving the 1
l largest number of movers, the survey shows that the number of movers dropped from 518 to 513 since the last report. The number of' movers to Sumner County is close to.that projected, but all other counties are receiving far fewer move'.s than expected. Mover l
projections were made only for the five impact counties, but 388 employees moved to other counties. These 388 movers are widely dispersed throughout numerous counties with no resultant, significant 1
adverse impacts, i
II.
General Characteristics of Movers Total Project--Table A-5 contains data on family status and charac-f teristics and housing choice for all movers. Table A-4 compares these results uith TVA's projections on the characteristic of 1amoving families. As of September 30, 1980, 77 percent of those l
employees who moved brought their families; and 23 percent moved without their families. School-age children per family averaged 0.9 compared with 'the projected 1.0, and the total average family. size I
was 3.4 compared with the projected 3.0.
The survey of housing 1
)
choice 'shows 58 percent are living in houses, 21 percent in mobile homes, 14 percent in apartments, 3 perceat in motel and sleeping l
rooms, and 5 pu cent in other accommodations. The "Other" cat'egory.
includes campers, motor homes, and vans.
, Impact Counties and Communities
~
Data on family status and characteristics and housing choice for movers into each impact county are contained in tables A-6 through A-10 and for movers within the city limits of each of the impact communities containing at least 50 movers in tables A-ll through A-16.
Other Counties and Communities TVA also accumulates data on counties and communities which are not part of the designated impact area.
Occe the construction-related inmoving population reaches a level of 50 inmovers for communities or 100 inmovers for counties, TVA begins monitoring and reporting impacts to ensure that no communities are inadvertently left out of the designated impact area. Hendersonville, with 71 inmovers as shown in table A-3, is a community outside the impact area which is being monitored. However, Hendersonville with an approximate popu-lation of 28,000 is not adversely affected by the influx of popula-tion it is servicing.
ihe level of movers into Nashville and Davidson County has dropped below the level which TVA monitors and reports during this reporting period.
III. Secondary Employment Secondary employment impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade-and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Hartsville project.
If the population increase in a county is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other primary employment increases, the possibility of secondary cmployment exists.
The survey results of September 30, 1980, revealed a decline in
_ project-related population in three of five impact area counties from
[
the March 31, 1980, survey. Macon County experienced a slight project-related increase of 28' persons to a total of 463 and Sumner County a i
very slight increase of 8 persons to a total of 1,533.
The peak popu-lation influx into both Macon and Sumner Counties was recorded in the
[
September 30, 1979, employee survey at 479 and 1,596 respectively.
Table 1 contains data for the period April 30, 1976, to September 30, 1980, covering the period from start of construction to the date of the most current survey. All counties have experienced population change which cannot be explained by other primary employment. We have incorporated 1980 census populacion data in our population estimates I
but do not have the corresponding employment data from the same census
[
data source. No firm judgement on secondary employment can be made at
~
this time because compatible resident employment data are not available.
IV.
Functional Area Impacts and Mitigatior Actions Education--Monitoring direct impact on education was conducted primarily through reports from the seven school districts and t.he Tennessee Department of Education. School districts and the depart-ment submit repot ts in October and May of each school year showing the names of students whose parents are employed at the Hartsville i
Nuclear Plants, the school previously attended, school and grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation informatien.
4 A summary of school districts reports is shown in table 3.
All school districts reported a smaller direct impact student enrollment than anticipated for school year 1979-80.
_ - ~ - _ -.
. _ _.~.
- - Table 1 ESTIMATES OF POPULATION AND POPUt ATI0's C%':GE FOR MACON, SMITH, SUMNER, TROUSDALE. AND W!LSON C0'3 TIES. TENtiESSEE FOR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF HARTSVill E NUCLEAR PLANT CONSTRUCTi0t APRIL 30, 1976 - SEPTEMt1ER 30,1980 Remainder of Change in Population Population Change in Change in Project
- Nonproject Pelated Population Possible Change in Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of.
From Other Populatice 4/30/76 9/30/80 4/30/76 - 9/30/80 4/30/76 - 9/30/80 9/30/80 Primary Erploystent Unexplai ed Macon County 13,602 15,984 2,382 463 1,919 87 1,822 Smith County 12,643 15,249 2,606 501 2,105 1,926 173 Sumner County 69,544 88,071 18,527 1,533 16,994 9,525 7,469 Trousdale County 5,232 6,261 1,029 616 413 237 17f
- Wilson County 45,709 57,513 11,804 692 11,112 6,066 5,046
- TVA Employee Surveys.
Population estimates by Community Economics, Co m nity Economics 4/23/81
~
l Table 2 SCHOOL SYSTEM REPORTS OF HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS DIRECT IMPACT STUDENTS June 1, 1980 Number of Children Number of Children School System of Local Residents of Movers Total Macon County 253 130 383 Smith County 278 68 346 Sumner County 435 353 788 Trousdale County 208 109 317 Wilson County 194 49 243 Lebanon City 88 48 136 Watertown City 12 4
16 TOTAL 1,468 761 2,229 TVA, the Tennessee Department of Education, and the seven local school districts in the impact area continue to operate under agree-ments for alleviatirg impacts on local school districts. Under these agreements, TVA provides funds for classrooms and schoolbuses.
However, due to the previous impact aid payments and the small increase in direct impact students, TVA made no fiscal expenditures during this reporting period.
According to the school systems in the impact counties and the State Department of Education, TVA is continuing to meet its commitments; and the school systems are able to serve the direct impact students associated with the construction of the Hartsville Nuclear Plants.
, Housing-The objective of the Hartsville Nuclear Plants' housing mitigation program has been to assist in the development of mobile home parks in Macon and Ttousdale Counties in order to provide temporary housing for TVA construction workers. One hundred sixty-nine mobile home spaces have been developed through this program.
The Shady Grove Mobile Home Park in Hartsville, Tennessee, has 93 spaces. At present there are 72 units occupied. The Hillsdale Mobile Home Park, located approximately seven miles from the con-struction site, has 45 of its 76 units presently occupied. The Upper Cumberland Housing Development..)rporation has experienced financial difficulty and is still in the planning stages of liquidation of the Hillsdale Mobile Home Park.
Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA is continuing to assist the local planning commissions affected by this project and has agreed to reimburse them for one-half of their cost in obtaining the services of Tennessee State Planning Office for a one-year period. The need for additional assistance to the local planning commissions is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as appropriate. A summary of these payments is shown on table 3.
I l
Table 3 TVA LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS Amount Paid Total Paid Planning Commissions This period to Date llartsville-Trousdale County
$ 1,000
$ 5,308 Smith County 5,313 Sumner County 2,375 8,500 Wilson County 3,000 9,750 Carthage 425 3,677 South Carthage 625 3,069 Gordonsville 313 789 Lafayette 1,221 Gallatin 2,700 8,956 Lebanon 2,975 9,700 Hendersonville 2,231 8,956 Tennessee State Pla ming Of fice 20,000 TOTAL
$15,644
$85,239 1:a_ter and Sewet--The recently completed eight-inch waterline installation between the junction of East Main Street and McMurray Boulevard and extending eastward along McMurray Boulevard to the now abandoned pumping station east of Goose Creek has relieved low pressures which occasionally occurred in the Shady Grove Mobile Home Park and the elementary school area on Lock Six Road.
It has also alleviated filling problems with the 150,000-gallon water tank which TVA provided and located near the nuclear plant construction site to furnish demand water to the plant and surrounding area.
l TVA continues to assess the water and sewage treatment systems in the impact counties to detect possible adverse mover impacts as they occur. However, these assessments have not indicated a need for additional water and sewer mitigation assistance.
Should any significant adverse impacts be observed, TVA will immediately follow through with corrective measures; but it is not anticipated that significant additional expenditures will be required.
Ilealth and Medical Services--TVA has continued to assess the health needs of the five-county 'empact area; however, these assessments have not indicated a need for additional health mitigation efforts.
It is not anticipated that significant additional expenditures will be required.
Intergenerational Child Care Program--Under e contract with Mid-Cumberland lluman Resource Agency to operate the Hartsville Inter-generational Child Care Program, TVA has paid $10,448 this period.
Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA and the Tennessee Department of Transportation, the department has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly basis beginning in October 1975. With approximately 5,100 employees, peak-hour traf fic on Highway 25 was 440 vehicles per hour (VPH) east of the site and 860 VPli west of the site.
Counts for other key highway segments are shown in the following table.
Peak-hour volumes at all these locations are within the limits of acceptable volumes for level of service D operation of these highways (see
=
i i -
i appendix C).
In an effort to mitigate the peak-hour traffic volumes, TVA is continuing the employee transportation program (commuter vans I
j and buses).
i i
Trble 4 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (October 1975
. September 1980) i Number of TVA l
Vehicles During Commuter Peak Hour
- Traffic j
197}
1980 Highway 25 East of Plant 120 440 300 Highway 25 West of Plant 120 860 730 i
Highway 25 West of Hartsville 290 760 460 Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 210 510 280 Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 270 120 i
Highway 231 North of Lebanon 150 280 100 1
- The peak. hour occurred during the 3-4 p.m. hour.
Employee Transportation--During this period eight buses were added i
to the employee transportation proFram. This brought the total number of buses operating to and from the Hartsville Nuclear Plants i
to 24, as follows: Nashville - 8 buses; Gallatin - 4 buses; Lebanon and Lafayette - 2 buses each; Portland, Hermitage, Mt.
Juliet, Murfreesboro, Hendersonville, Joelton, and Whitehouse, 4
a Tennessee, and Scottsville, Kentucky - 1 bus each. During this same period the number of vanpools operating to the plantsite j-dropped trom 131 to 56.
Although ridership figures are not avail-able for the privately owned vanpools, for the most part they have i
. - ~ _ _,.. _. _, - _. _, ~., -. _ _, _.,. - _,..,
__...m.,,
m_---, - _ _... - _.. _., -,. _...
kept their groups together and ere assisting in reducing the amount of vehicular traf fic on Highway 25.
Forty-one percent of the day shift work force commutes in Agency-owned buses or vanpools. This accounts for approximately 787 cars being kept off the road.
TVA's expenditures for employee transportation for this period was $622,322.
Local Government Budgets-.he impact on the budgets of local govern-ments in the impact area of the Hartsville construction project is measured on an annual basis. This measurement is made by projecting the pr; * *ct-related revenues to be received by the local governments.
The projected <evenues and expenditures are then compared to determine whether deficits will occur. TVA then negotiates and executes contracts with local governments to provide payments to cover the amounts of any projected deficits. Payments were not made to local governments during this period.
TVA continues to monitor local government impacts after the contracts l
are negotiated; and if additional impacts occur. TVA will negotiate l
with the local governments in order to remove the deficit.
1 Local Recruitment and Training--During the period April through September 1980, 338 apprentices were in training in 15 skilled craft 1
l programs at the Hartsville project.
During that period, 85 appren-tices satisfactorily completed LLe training requirements of their respective programs and were promoted to craft jcurneymen. Also, 12 apprentices were terminatad f rom their respective programs for various reasons during that period.
- Nearly all apprentices in training at the hartsville project were recruited from the established recruitment area for that project which included the designated impact area. A few TVA apprentices were transferred to the Hartsvil1.e project prior to the period to gain work experience.
To help meet the Valley-wide demand for craftsmen in skills deemed critical and necessary to the construction of nuclear plants and maintenance of fossil-fired plants and to reduce mover impact to communities adjacent to TVA's major construction sites, training programs for two of these crafts--steamfitters and boilermakers--
have been operated at the Hartsville Vocational School. This approach allows local residents to take advantage of training to qualify them to compete in the local and regional labor market, resulting in a more stable work force and lower demand for inmovers.
Seventy-three steamfitter program graduates are employed at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants. Seventy-nine graduates of the boiler-maker program are employed at TVA plants in the area. Thirty-two students began the one-year boilermaker program January 7, 1980.
All are f rom the local recruitment area.
Recreation--TVA staff continued to monitor impacts on community recreation during the reporting period. Substantial progress was made in implementing park improvement projects in the impact area.
Contracts were signed with the cities of Hartsville, Lebanon, and Callatin and Trousdale, Smith, and Macon Counties to provide $218,760 for recreation development projects. An additional $450,000 was provided through Federal grants, local revenues, and inkind services to supplement TVA's fincialal assistance.
Contracts implemented during the reporting period are as follows:
Total Committed Total Committed This Period To Date Hartsville/Trousdale County
$ 20,000
$ 35,520 Lebanoc 51,760 51,760 Gallatin 67,000 67,000 Smith County 48,000 48,000 Macon County 32,000 32,000
$218,760
$234,280 The level of TVA financial assistance for recreation mitigation is tracked to actual inmover rates in the impact area.
Other factors considerad in determining TVA's level of assistance include the existing recrcation service level, maximizing opportunities to combine several funding sources, evidence of local participation, and relative impacts considering communities' or counties' population and capability to absorb impacts.
TVA will continue to monitor community recreation impacts after contracts have been implemented to ensure the adequacy of the project and to determine if additional action is necessary.
Summary of Mitigation Expenditures--In the functional areas of mitigation, TVA has made payments totaling $7,650,894 as noted in table 5.
Table 5 SURERY OF TVA MITIGATION EXPENDITURES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1980 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date Education
$1,523,084 Ilousing 423,000a Local Planning and Coordination 40,644 334,771 b
Water and Sewer 380,000 Health 108,772 Intergenerational Child Care Program 10,448 10,448 Local Governments 764,939 Employee Transportation 622,322 3,967,005 Recreation 123,355 138,875C TOTAL
$796,769
$7,650,894 a.
Includes $60,000 interest-bearing loan.
b.
Includes $125,000 noninterest-bearing loan.
Includes $15,520 paid prior to reporting period, but not previously c.
reported.
t
u 3_L a.
u-W n--
n e-L
>-e u-
~*
s-
-4 w-~J-A
-w
+.- --
.aa.
^
t 4
9 e
L r
i d
i APPENDIXES
{
e n
1 I
4 4
4
\\
v.-
,--...m
- r
--n,,,x,--
e e_
-r.
-w.<
-p r e -
..c
--g.,
-.m.,
__m.,
. i Table A-1 FOLLOW UP SURVEY TOWN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 02/23/81 HAR TSVI LL E NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 103519 ACi:VE EMPL0 FEES 09-30-80 REPOAT 2
MOVED TO ALREADY TOWN TOWN IN TOWN TOTAL POPULATION ALEXANDRIA TN 11 33 44 680 BAXTER TN 7
49 56 1,314 CARTHAGE TN 61 117 178 2.491 COOKEVILLE TN 32 74 106 17,800 CR055VILLE TN 13 38 51 5,381 00wELLTOWN TN 6
16 22 329 GAINE5 BORO TN 9
37 46 1,101 GALLATIN TN 300 354 654 13.362 GDRDON5VILLE TN 12 32 44 601 HARTSVILLE TN 241 176 417 2,243 HENDERSONVILLE IN 77 131 20R 28,000 LAFAYETTE TN 125 182 70T 2,583 LE8 ANON TN 181 231 412 12,492 MANCHESTER TN 7
20 27 6,869 MURFREESBORO TN 19 38 57 28.700 N ASHVILLE TN 46 400 454 469.000 PORTLAND TN 17 46 63 3,081 e
RED BOILING SPRINGS TN 14 48 62 956 SMITHVILLE TN 9
94 103 3,762 SOUTH C AR THAGE TN 6
21 27 959 SPARTA TN 12 10 22 4.930 WESTMORELAND TN 20 63 83 1,423 BE THP A GE TN 19 44 63 40 0 CASTALIAN SPRINGS TN 52 42 94 150 C0 f f 0N TOWN TN 6
13 19 100 DIXON SPRINGS TN 51 30 81 100 G000LETT5VILLE TN 10 46 56 Te541 HERMITAGE TN 9
30 39 6.000 MADISON TN 12 82 94 21.500 MOUNT JULIET TN 32 75 107 1,568 OLO HICKORY TN 11 49 60 6.000 PLEASANT SHADE TN 15 26 41 150 RIDDLETON TN 12 to 28 100 WATERTOWN TN 7
25 32 1,061 WHITE HOUSE TN I6 7
23 1,305 GCOTTSVILLE KY 5
69 74 3,584 FOUNT AIN RUN KY 5
4 9
128 SUBTOTAL 1487 2T76 4263 ALC000 TN 2
5 7
1,917 CELINA TN 3
20 23 1,370 CHARLOTTE TN 2
6 8
610 CLARKSVILLE TM 1
8 9
44,900 e
...__y
. ~..._ -.,,,,_
i.
Table A-1, Page 2 FOLLOW UP $URVEY TOWN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 02/23/81 HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PL ANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 103519 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE 5 09-30-80 REPORT 2
MOVED TO ALREADY TOWN TOWN IA TOWN TOTAL POPULATEDN FRAMKLIN TN O
5 5
11,298 GREEN BR I ER TN 3
29 32 2,279 LA VERGNE TN 3
8 11 5,209 LIBERTY TN 1
20 21 332 MCMINNVILLE TN 3
8 11 11,610 RIDGETOP TN 2
5 7
810 SHEL8YvlLLE TN O
9 9
11,900 SMY RN A TN 4
8 12 5,698 SPRINGFIELD TN 3
19 22 9,T20 TULLAHOMA TN 2
6 8
15,577 wo008URY TN 4
11 15 2,087 ANTlqCH TN 1
14 15 900 ASHLAND CITt TN 4
12 16 2,027 BRUSH CREEK TN 3
16 19 230 BUFFALO VALLEY TN 2
to 12 100 CHESTNUT MOUND TN O
7 7
125 DONEL SON TN 1
11 12 25,500 ELMWOOD IN 3
12 15 100 GRANVILLE TN O
6 6
100 HICKMAN TN 3
19 22 200 JOELTON TN 1
19 20 900 LANCASTER TN 4
6 to 150 M055 TN 2
9 11 200 SILVER POINT TN 4
1T 21 150 WHITLEYVILLE TN 1
5 6
50 80Mt.ING GR EEN KY I
5 6
39,400 FRANKLIN KY 2
5
?
7,176 GAMALIEL KY 0
5 5
431 TOMPAINSVILLE KY 3
17 20 2,207 ADOLPHUS KY 1
7 8
250 SUBTOIAL 69 369 438 OTHEk 102 180 282 I
TOTAL RESPONSES 1658 3325 4983 HNP WORnFORCE TOTAL 5137 l
09-30-80 l
l
- ~
vv,,
-e r
. Table A-2 FOLLOW UP SURVEY SOURCE AND LOCATibN OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES AUN DATE 02/23/81 HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT RUN TIME 103558 i
ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-N-30 REPORT 4
OTHER OTHER OTHER
~ IMPACT COUNTIES REC.
TENN.
KENTUCKY FROM - TO TROUSDALE SMITH RACON SUMNER WILSON DAVIOSON COUNTIES COUNTIES COUNTIES OTr*ER I4B TOTAL TROUSDAL E (1) 177 9
8 25 4
4 3
230 SMITH til 10 322 8
3 10 2
9 2
1 367 M ACON til 3
3 2,3 8
6 1
2 268 SUMNER (1) 18 7
9 T28 8
13 11
?
2 799 blL50N Ill 8
8 1
16 336 8
11 6
394 CAVIDSON (18 12 19 4
86 36 670 26 19 872 i
OTHER RECRUITING COUN (2) 14 23 16 19 14 9
701 23 4
823 l
OTHER TN. COUNTIES (38 95 51 34 145 73 26 1?
235 2
9 709 CTHER FY. COUNTIES (31 4
7 8
4 2
13 38 ALA8AMA 22 12 5
57 24 7
6 1
16 150 ARKANSAS 1
1 2
4 1
9 GEORGIA 6
1 2
3 4
1 1
2 Ls MISSISSIPPI 2
1 4
1 1
9 NORTH CAROLINA 1
3 3
7 SOUTH CAROLINA 1
1 1
1 2
6 OTHER STATES 46 25 36 85 34 14 12 13 17 282
- TOT AL 419 482 3T9 1195 558 756 82 6 302 22 44 4983 i
NOTE 8 OATA ON DIAGONAL IN01CATE NONMOVERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MOVES WITHIN A COUNTY.
ALL OTHER DATA INDICATE MOVERS.
Ill RECRUITING COUNTY I28 TENNESSEE COUNTIES: CANNON. CLAYe DE K AL S.
JACKSON, PUTNAM, R08ERT50Ne RUTHERFORD KENTUCKY COUNTIES
- ALLEN MONROE. SIMP 5ON 833 ALL COUNTIES IN KENTUCKY ANO TENNESSEE OTHER THAN RECRUITING COUNTIEC I4) "0THER" INCLUDES NON-RESPONSES OR ERRONEOUS RESPONSES FOR CURRENT O%iSS.
Table A-3 Ilartsville Nuclear Plants Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community September 30, 1980 I
Percent Number I
of of Population Influx County Movers _
Movers School age Total Trousdale 15 250 145 616 Smith 11 180 121 501 Macon 9
148 130 463 Sumner 30 513 390 1.533 Wilson 14 230 193 692 Other Counties
_23 388 252
,1,052 2
Total 100 1,709 1,231 4,857 3
_ Community Carthage 3
46 13 96 Gallatin 11 192 121 536 Ilartsville 10 164 85 368 Ilendersonv111e 4
71 40 177 Lafayette 4
59 57 191 Lebanon
_4 64 37 163 Total 36 596 353 1,531 9
1.
Numbers extrapolated.
2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
3.
Within municipal limits.
Table A-4 Hartsville Nuclear Plsnts Comparison of Survey Resul's with Projections for Selected Par imeters Employment Level - 5,13)
I Projected Surveyed Number Movers 2,774 1,709 Percent Movers 54 33 School age Children 1,803 1,231 School age Children / Family 1.0 0.9 Total Population 6,380 4,857 Percent Number Percent
. Number Movers with Families 65 1,803 77 1,309 Movers without Families 35 971 23 400 Percent _
Number Percent Number Housing Choice:
Houses 31 860 58 995 l
Mobile Homes 47 1,304 21 358 Apartments 18 499 14 231 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4
111 3
47 Other J
0 5
78 Total 100 2,774 1002 1,709 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:
Trousdale 30 832 15 250 Smith 20 555 11 180 Macon 10 277 9
148 Sumner 20 555 30 513 Wilson 20 555 14 230 Other Counties 0
0 23 388 2
Total 100 2,774 100 1,709 1.
Num'oers extrapolated.
2., Percentages may not edd to 100 because of rounding.
. Table A-5 F OLL OW UP SURVEY WORMER 5 WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 017 AUN DATE 02/23/81 NOVER SUMM ARY REPDAT IF ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 RUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHI L DR EN NUM8ER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDR E N SCHDOL SCHDOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OdNED 239 142 356 183 66 14 253 6005E RENTED 45 13 42 15 6
12 57 APARTMENT RENTED 31 6
19 8
1 41 72 PCBILE HCME RENTED 6
6 7
8 0
5 11 MOBILE HOME OWNED 22 F
23 6
2 11 33 SLEEPING ROOM 2
2 5
4 0
3 5
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
GTHER 5
1 3
1 1
3 8
TOTAL 350 177 455 225 76 91 441 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNtD 363 22T 590 301 138 16 379 HOUSE RENTED 220 107 330 147 60 56 276 APARTMENT RENTED 87 28 81 24 12 65 152 POSILE HOME RENTED 64 30 91 47 to 52 116 POSILE HCME OWNED 148 75 192 96 37 39 187 SLEEPING RDOM 4
0 3
0 0
10 14 POTEL 5
3 7
4 0
20 25 GTHER 29 12 34 12 5
39 68 TOTAL 920 482 1328 631 262 297 1217 i
l ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 602 369 946 484 204 30 632 NOUSE RENTED 265 120 372 162 66 68 333 APARTMENT MENTED 118 34 100 32 13 106 224 POSILE HCME RENTED TO 36 98 55 to 57 127 POSILE HOME OWNED 170
-82 215 102 39 50 220 SLEEPING ROOM 6
2 8
4 0
13 19 I
MOTEL 5
3 7
4 0
22 27 CTHER 34 13 37 13 6
42 76 TOTAL 1270 659 1T83 856 338 388 1658 I
I t
- Ta'ule A-6 FOLLDW UP SURVEY WORRERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA P A GE 006 MACON RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHI LDRE N NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL Sr.400L FAMILY MOVERS ANf4UAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 9
7 13 9
1 0
9 HOUSE RENTED 5
2 9
2 2
3 8
APARTMENT RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
NCBILE HOME RENTED 2
2 2
2 0
1 3
MOBILE HOME OWNED 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
SLEEPING RDOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 18 11 24 13 3
5 23 HOURLY EMPL0 FEES HOUSE OWNED 50 29 76 39 18 2
52 POUSE RENTED 18 11 34 18 4
2 20 APARTMENT RENTED 3
2 5
3 0
0 3
NOBILE HOME RENTED 9
4 17 8
0 3
12 NOBILE HOME OWNED 21 10 24 11 6
3 24 SLEEPING RDOM o
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
OTHER 3
2 3
2 1
3 6
TOTAL 104 58 159 81 29 17 121 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 59 36 89 48 19 2
61 kDUSE RENTED 23 13 43 20 6
5 28 APAR TMENT RENTED 4
2 5
3 0
0 4
P081LE HCME RENTED 11 6
19 10 0
4 15 MOBILE HOME OWNED 22 10 24 11 6
4 26 SLEEPING RDOM 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
CTHER 3
2 3
2 1
3 6
TOTAL 122 69 183 94 32 22 144 e
-~
r
- Table A-7 i
FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKER $ WHO MOVEQ INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 007 SMITH RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TJT AL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-30 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HDOSE OWNED 9
6 17 10 4
1 10 HOUSE RENTED 8
2 1
1 2
10 APARTMENT RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
POBILE HOME RENTED 2
2 4
0 1
3 POSILE HOME OWNED 4
1 1
0 1
1 5
$LEEFING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL CTHER 1
1 2
1 1
0 1
TOTAL 24 12 28 16 7
8 32 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 31 22 57 26 20 1
32 HOU$E RENTED 25 10 36 13 4
3 23 APARTMENT RENTED s
0 3
0 0
7 10 POSILE HOME RENTE3 F
3 10 4
0 8
15 POSILE HOME OWNED 35 14 42 17 6
13 48 SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
4 4
MOTEL 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
OTHER 3
2 5
3 0
1 4
TOTAL 105 52 154 64 30 38 143 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 40 28 74 36 24 2
42 HOUSE RENTED 33 12 40 14 5
5 38 APARTMENT RENTED 3
0 3
0 0
9 12 MO8ILE HOME RENTED 9
5 14 8
0 9
18 FOBILE HOME OWNED 39 15 43 17 7
14 53
$LEEPl%G ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
5 5
MOTEL 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
OTHER 4
3 7
4 1
1 5
TOTAL 129 64 182 80 37 46 175 f
- Table A-8 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 008 SUMNER RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPDAT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOVEES 09-30-80 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHIL DREN MOVERS CHIL DREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHDOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVE RS ANNUAL E MP?.0YEES HOUSE OWNED 142 84 222 108 44 8
150 HOUSE RENTED 12 3
7 2
1 2
14 APARTMENT RENTED 18 2
12 3
1 23 41 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1
1 1
1 0
0 1
POBILE HOME OWNED 5
2 9
2 0
2 7
SLEEPING ROOM 1
1 3
2 0
1 2
MOTEL O TH ER 2
0 1
0 0
1 3
TOTAL 181 93 255 118 46 37 218 HDURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 102 63 162 90 34 4
106 HOUSE RENTED 54 25 90 36 14 16 70 APARTMENT RENTED 27 9
26 10 1
14 41 MOBILE HOME RENTED 7
2 7
2 0
13 20 MOBI LE HCME OWNED 28 15 38 17 8
6 34 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1
0 1
0 0
0 1
C THER 5
2 5
1 1
3 8
TOTAL 224 116 329 156 58 56 280 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 244 147 384 198 78 12 256 HOUSE RENTED 66 28 97 38 15 18 84 APARTMENT RENTED 45 11 38 13 2
37 82 MOBILE HOME RENTED 8
3 8
3 0
13 21 MC81LE HOME OWNED 33 17 47 19 8
8 41 SLEEPING ROOM 1
1 3
2 0
1 MOTEL 1
0 1
0 0
0 2
1 OTHER 7
2 6
1 1
4 11 TOTAL 405 209 584 274 104 93 498 O
. Table A-9 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLE AA PL ANT ARE A PAGE 009 TROUSDALE RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPDRT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE 5 09-30-80 RUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHIL DREN MOVER $ CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCH OOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVE RS A NNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 6
5 11 7
1 0
6 POUSE RENTED 4
2 5
3 2
1 5
APARTMENT RENTED 3
1 1
1 0
6 9
MOBILE HOME RENTED 1
1 0
1 0
2 3
MOSILE HOME OWNED 9
4 9
4 1
5 14 SLEEPING RDOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOT <L OTHER TOTAL 23 13 26 16 4
15 38 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 20 8
27 15 4
2 22 h0USE RENTED 33 20 52 22 13 7
40 APAR TMENT RENTED 12 4
10 1
3 12 24 MOBILE HOME RENTED 27 11 31 17 6
20 47 M081LE HOME OWNE0 34 20 42 24 12 11 45 SLEEPING ROOM 2
0 3
0 0
3 5
MOTEL 2
1 4
2 0
7 9
OTHER 2
2 5
2 0
to 12 TOTAL 132 66 174 83 38 72 204 A LL EMPLOYEES NOUSE OWNED 26 13 38 22 5
2 28 HDU$E RENTED 37 22 5?
25 15 8
45 APARTMENT RENTED 15 5
11 2
3 18 33 PO6ILE HOME RENTED 28 12 31 18 6
22 50
- 0 BILE HOME OWNE0 43 24 51 28 13 16 59 SLEEPING ROOM 2
0 3
0 0
4 6
MOTEL 2
1 4
2 0
7 9
GTHER 2
2 5
2 0
to 12 TOTAL 155 79 200 99 42 87 242 e
O
Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HART SVILL E NUCLE AR PLANT ARE A PAGE 010 WILSON RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT IS ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-3 D-80 AUN TI ME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCH OOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE Oh..ED 60 33 78 41 10 3
63 HOUSE RENTED 7
1 4
3 0
3 10 APARTMENT RENTED 4
2 2
2 0
3 7
POBILE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOBILE HOME OWNED 2
0 4
0 0
2 4
SLEEPING RDOM 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
CTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 74 37 90 48 10 14 88 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 50 35 79 44 22 0
50 HOUSE RENTED 20 13 35 18 12 8
28 APARTMENT RENTED 20 8
23 6
5 7
27 MOBILE HCME RENTED 3
3 5
5 0
3 6
MOBILE HOME OWNED 13 8
23 14 1
4 17 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
CTHER 6
1 7
1 1
0 6
TOTAL 112 68 1 72 88 4?
23 135 l
ALL EMPL OY E E S FOUSE OWNED 110 68 157 85 32 3
113 HOUSE RENTED 27 14 39 21 12 11 38 APAR TMENT RENTED 24 10 25 8
5 10 34 MOBILE HOME RENTED 3
3 5
5 0
4 7
MOBliE HOME OWNED 15 8
27 14 1
6 21 SLEEPING ROOM 1
1 2
2 0
0 1
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
OTHER 6
1 7
1 1
1 7
TOTAL 186 105 262 136 51 37 223 9
. Table A-11 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HAR T S VILL E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 001 t
CARTHAGE RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPL0rEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 RUN TIME 103501
~
WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHI L DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPL0rEES HOUSE OWNED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
HOUSE RENTED 2
1 2
0 1
1 3
APAR TMENT RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
8081LE HOME RENTED M081LE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 2
1 2
0 1
5 7
HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 4
2 4
2 2
0 4
HOUSE RENTED 3
1 T
4 0
1 4
APAR TMENT RENTED 2
0 1
0 0
4 6
MOBILE HOME RENTED 1
0 2
0 0
3 4
PO8ILE HOME OWNED 9
2 6
2 0
5 14 SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOTEL 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
OTHER 1
1 2
1 0
1 2
TOTAL 21 7
23 to 2
IT 38 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 4
2 4
2 2
1 5
HOUSE RENTED 5
2 9
4 1
2 7
l APARTMENT RENTED 2
0 1
0 0
6 8
POSILE HOME RENTED 1
0 2
0 0
3 4
M08tLE HOME OWNED 9
2 6
2 0
5 14 I
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
3 3
MOTEL 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
OTHER 1
1 2
1 0
1 2
TOTAL 23 8
25 10 3
22 45 O
1 l
- Table A-12 FOLLOW UP SUAVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAA PLANT AAE A PAGE U02 GALLATIN RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AEPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDAEN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVEAS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EM.'LOYEES HOUSE OWNED 42 22 ST 27 6
2 44 HOUSE RENTED 6
2 4
2 0
1 7
APARTMENT RENTED 7
1 6
2 0
12 19 POBILE HOME RENTED P0 BILE HOME OWNED 3
0 4
0 0
1 4
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MCT5L CTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 58 25 71 31 6
18 76 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 34 21 49 29 14 2
36 HOUSE RENTED 23 10 33 12 7
2 25 APARTMENT RENTED 15 6
to 5
1 6
21 MOBILE HOME RENTED 2
1 4
1 0
9 11 MOBILE HOME OWNED 10 6
13 6
4 1
11 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1
0 1
0 0
0 1
O TH ER 2
1 2
1 0
.1 5
TOTAL 87 45 118 54 26 23 110 ALL EMPLOY E E S house OWNED 76 43 106 56 20 4
80 NOUSE RENTED 29 12 37 14 7
3 32 APARTMENT RENTED 22 7
22 7
1 18 40
- CBILE HOME RENTED 2
1 4
1 0
9 11 MOBILE HOME OWNED 13 6
17 6
4 2
15 SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL 1
0 1
0 0
0 1
CTHER 2
1 2
1 0
4 6
TOTAL 145 70 189 85 32 41 186 O
. Table A-13 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 003 HARTSVILLE RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEE $ LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 0v-30-80 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILOREN NUM8ER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 3
2 5
3 1
0 3
HOUSE RENIED APARTMENT RENTED 3
1 1
1 0
6 9
MOSILE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOBILE HOME OWNED 3
2 3
3 0
4 7
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOTEL 0 THE R TOTAL 9
5 9
7 1
12 21 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 8
3 9
5 2
1 9
HOUSE RENTED 21 15 33 18 10 4
25 APARTMENT RENTED 12 4
10 1
3 12 24 MOBILE HOME RENTED 18 7
20 11 3
16 34 POSILE HOME OWNED 18 11 20 13 6
10 28 SLEEPING ROOM 2
0 3
0 0
3 5
MOTEL 2
1 4
2 0
4 6
OTHER 0
0 0
0 0
7 7
TOTAL 81 41 99 50 24 57 138 ALL E MPL OYE E S I
HOUSE OWNED 11 5
14 8
3 1
12 NOUSE RENTED 21 15 33 18 10 4
25 l
APAR TMENT RENTE0 15 5
11 2
3 18 33 MOBILE HOME RENTED 18 7
20 11 3
17 35 POSILE HOME OWNED 21 13 23 16 6
14 3G SLEEPING ROOM 2
0 3
0 0
4 6
MOTEL 2
1 4
2 0
4 6
OTHER C
0 0
0 0
7 7
TOTAL 90 46 108 57 25 69 159 l
l s
.,e
~.
33 Table A-14 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HAR T SV IL L E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 016 HENDE R SON VILL E RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMP10 VEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS REPORT 10 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-3 D-80 RUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHIL DREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUM8ER IN IN MOVE RS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 4
2 4
2 1
3 7
HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 8
1 4
1 1
9 17 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 12 3
8 3
2 12 24 HOUkLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 18 12 31 20 6
0 18 HOUSE RENTED 2
8 1
2 4
10 APARTMENT RENTED 9
3 9
5 0
6 15 PCBILE HOME RENTED POSILE HOME QWNED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
TOTAL 35 17 48 26 8
10 45 ALL E MPL OY E E S I
HOUSE OWNED 22 14 35 22 7
3 25 HOUSE RENTED 6
2 8
1 2
4 10 APARTMENT RENTED 17 4
13 6
1 15 32 MC8ILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
SLEEPING ROOM POTEL l
l CTHER 1
0 0
C 0
0 1
TOTAL 47 20 56 29 to 22 69 l
I
Table A-15 FGLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 004 LAFAYETTE RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPDAT 14 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 AUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRAD (
HIGH WITHOUT TOT AL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN S CH00t SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AP,NUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 3
2 4
3 1
0 3
HDUSE RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
3 3
APARTMENT RENTED 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
MOBILE HCHE RENTED 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
P08ILE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 5
3 5
4 1
4 9
HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 25 16 41 21 11 0
25 HOUSE RENTED 9
5 17 8
1 1
10 APARTMENT RENTED 3
2 5
3 0
0 3
MOBILE HOME RENTED 5
3 13 6
0 0
5 MOBILE HOME OWNED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
OTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 42 26 76 38 12 6
48 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 28 18 45 24 12 0
28 HOUSE RENTED 9
5 17 8
1 13 APARTMENT RENTED 4
2 5
3 0
0 4
POSILE HOME RENTE:n 6
4 14 7
0 1
7 MOBILE HOME OWNED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
SLEEPING A004 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
GTHER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 4T 29 81 42 13 10 57 O
,, - ~
-y-
Table A-16 FDLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTS VILL E NUCLE AR PL ANT ARE A PAGE 005 LE8 ANON RUN DATE 02/23/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPDAT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-80 RUN TIME 103501 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHI L DREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 8
4 9
4 1
0 8
HOUSE RENTED 1
1 3
3 0
0 1
APARTMENT RENTED 3
1 1
1 0
3 6
M38ILE HOME f.ENTED POSILE HOME OWNED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
SLEEPING RDOM MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
O TH ER 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
TOTAL 12 6
13 8
1 6
18 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 6
5 8
6 2
0 6
HCUSE RENTED 5
4 14 7
4 5
10 APARTMENT RENTED 13 4
12 3
2 6
19 POSILE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
POSILE HOME OWNED 4
2 8
2 1
2 6
SLEEPING RDOM MOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
CTHER 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
TOTAL 29 15 42 18 9
15 44 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 14 9
17 10 3
0 14 HOUSE RENTED 6
5 17 10 4
5 11 APARTMENT RENTED 16 5
13 4
2 9
25 POSILE HOME RENTED 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
MOBILE HOME OWNED 4
2 8
2 1
3 i
SLFEPING ROOM NOTEL 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
C THER 1
0 0
0 0
1 2
TOTAL 41 21 55 26 to 21 62
,.. ~.. -
I Appendix B SECC:II'ARY SO:ICECO?lct4IC IMPACT MO:lITORIllG OF HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS ENVIR02fENTAL IMPACT AREA Secondary impact is defined as a tem: >rary increase in the trade and service related resident population of the five-county area having an impact on community facilities and services which can be attributed to the Hartsville construction project.
TVA's monitoring program will consist of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for estimating and reconciling population changes for each of the impact area counties. Residential customars of power distributors and school enrollment will be used to provide independent estLnates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Populauton for the beginning of the first reporting period will be estimated by applying the procedure outlined in Step I below to the most current estimate of county population provided by U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reportr. Subsequent estimates of population for the
~
start of a reporting period will be the TVA estimate at the end of the previous reporting period and will be adjusted each time more current census estimates are available.
An estimate of secondary bnpact will be made using the following three-step process.
Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population will be calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for each of the bnpact area counties. These ratios wi31 be applied to the number of resi-dential customers and school enrollment at the end of the period. This yields two estimates of population change during the reporting period.
These two estimates ara averaged to produce a single estimate of population change f
each of the impact area counties.
Step II Project employment population, Laken from TVA employee surveys, will be subtracted from total adjusted population. If a residual population is derived, the analysis will continue to Step III.
Stco III This step comprises an analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining unexplained population change should not be attributed to the project.
An astimate of change in total employment in each of the impact area counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from the " CPS Labor Force Summary" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security.
In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment.
Change in nonproject related primary employment is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tennessee State Planning Office, Tennessee kieration. Population Families, Income, and Fhnpower Demand Projections to 1990 for Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of.65 will be applied to the change in nonproject related primary employment to determine that part of the change in secondary employment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment change is converted to population using an average family size of three and subtracted frem ary unexplained population remaining. [~If th;ere it no other explanation for the remaining population, then the possibility of it being the result of necondary employment dces exist. However, there may be a delay of undetermined duration between a change in employment and the resultant change in population. Therefore, the unexplained populatien in any particular county shoulu persist through more than one reporting period before it is termedassecondaryimpact.]
As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special census or census estimates are published, the population base of the impact area counties will be recalibrated. Residential customers, school enrollment, and total population vill be recorrelated. Essentially, a ne. population base will be estimated from which to measure change throughout the remainder of the monitoring period.
/[ Revised 3/16/78_7 Appendix C TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in cperating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops.n operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for chort periods of time.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual Highway Research Board Special Report 87, 1965.
e
t Appendix D-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - TRADES AND LABOR
- 2 NAME LOCIAL SECURITY NO.
LAST FIRST 3.
WHE RE DID YOU LtVE REFORE LEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT?
CITY COUNTY 2.
WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEMP STREET ADDRESS 5
CITY COU'JTY STATE 3.
DO YOU Live INS:0E THE CITY LIMITS?
YES NO 4 HOW DIO YOU OSTAIN MOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRACE OR TYPE OF WORKP (CHECK ONLY ONM
- 1. HIGH SCHOOL
- 4. ARMEO SERVICES
- 2. COLLEGE 1 ON THE JOB BUT NOT FORMAL
~
- 6. OTHER (PLIEASE SPEC!?Y) 5.
IMMf DI ATE LY B EFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECT WHAT WAS YOUR LAST 308 (SUCH A3 5TE AMF1TTING LAWORE R, F ARYING, MAINTENANCE, ETCJP j
6.
WH AT TYPE OF BUSl*.ESS WEHE YOL, IN (SUCH AS MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR l
OR M AINTENAtJCE SHOP, ETC.)?
t 7.
WHE RE WAS THl3 BUSINESS LOCATED?
l CITY STATE f
8.
CHECK WHICH TYPE OF RESICE NCE IN THE PROJECT ARE A WHE RE YOU NOW LIVE.
(
- 7. MOTEL
- 5. HOUSE
- l. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM
- 4. MO81tE HOME
- 3. APARTME NT
IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MORILE HOME ;"*,HE PROJECT ARE A,00 YOU OWN ITF YES NO 10.
IN THE PROJECT ARE A, CHECK WITH wHOM YOU LIVE.
l
- 2. WI TH MY F AMILY
~
- 3. WITH ROOYMe TES, I. BY MYSELF HOW f.? ANY ?
- 4. OTHER (PLE ASE LPLCIFY) l i
ll.
DeOW MANY CHILORFN LIVE 78TD' YOU 14 THE PROJECT AHC AP OF THESE, HOW U ANY GO TO GR ADE SCHOOLP OF THESE. HOW e
- ANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL'
[
VES NO TH AN< YOU FOR COOPF N ATaNG IN THIS SUR*>EY.
I HAH f'Vit t E NUCLE AR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY AppeHdix D-2 EMPLOYEE OUEST10NNAIRE - SA!.ARY POI.!Cl 3
NAPtE SOCIAL SECURITY NO.
LAST Fin 5T 1.
WHiRE DIO YOU Ltvt nE FOR E BECINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT 7 CITY COUNTY STATE 2.
WHE RE ARE YCU NOW LIVI?;G OURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRtSS CITY COUNTY STATE 2.
CO YOU LtVE tre5101 THI CITY LIMIT 5?
YES NO 4 HOW DIO YCU 03TAtN *. TOST OF THE TRAlte:teG THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PT.ESENT TR ADE OR TYPE OF *.vCRX' (CHECA O.%Y Cr.E OF THE FOLLOWING)
- 1. HtOH 5CHCOL
- 4. ARMED SERVICES
- 2. COLLEGO
- 5. CN THE JOB BUT NOT FORMAL
- 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 5.
IMMEOi4TELY BEFORE ACCEPTINC EMPLOY'/.ENT ON THIS PROJECT WHAT WAS YOIJR LAST JOB (SUCH AS CLEMICALs 51CTiETA RfAL. ENGINE E RING AIDE, LABORER, ETC.17 6.
WHAT TYPE OF EUS;r.ESS WE RE YOU IN (SUCH AS f,1ANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION, RETAIL, SALES. SE R VICES, ETC.)?
7.
WHE RE WAS THIS DU5aP;ESS LCCATED7 CITY STATE
- . CHE CK %HiCH TY'E C5 NES10ENCE IN THE PROJECT ARE A WHERE YOU NOW LtVE.
- 1. BOARO.NJ OR SLE E PING i'IOG'.1
- 4. MOstLk HOME
- 2. 90TEL
- 5. HOUSE
_ 3 aPARTME?af
- 6. OTHE H (PLCASE SPECIFY) 3.
IF YOU Livi IN A HOUSE Of. 'AUd LE HOME IN THE PHOJECT ARE A 00 YOU C'AN IT1 YES Pv0 10, IN THE PROJECT AHE A.CHE CK wtTH WHOM YOU LIVE.
- 1. SY f.tvSE L F
- 3. WITH HOON1st ATES.
- 2. we TH *AY F AuiLY HOW 94ANY?
- 4. Of fiE R (PL E ASL SPECIF Y)
~
13.
HOW ttANY CHILOCEta LevF We TH VCu lN THE PetOJECT AHE A7 OF THESE. HOW 9.1 ANY CO TO G1140E SCHOOL?
OF THE SE. HOW M AfeY CO TO HIGH SCHOOL' 37 HAVE YOU LAVED AT YOf)H PRESEPIT ADDRESS VORE THAN Six MONTHS 7 YES NO TH APaK T OU FO4 COO'E M ait*4G IN THe5 5UMvE Y.
H AH f 5viLLE.ia:Lf An et As T :.EW EurLCt EE SURVEY r
i l
I 1 l
Appendix D-3 FOLLOW UP QUESTIONNAIRE l
1.
Do you still live at (Emniovee's Address)
?
YES.
IF SO, SKIP TO OUESTION 2.
N O.
IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:
WHE RE ARE YOU NOW LivlNG DURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?
YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCEIN THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN 1.
- 2. MOTEL
- 3. A9ARTMENT 4.
MOBILE HOME 5.
HOUSE
- 6. OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIF Y) e 2.
IF YOU LtVE IN A HOUSE OR MOSILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA, DO YOU OWN IT?
YES NO 3.
IN THE PROJECT ARE A. CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:
1.
SY MYSELF
?. WITH MY F AMILY 3 WITH ROOMMATES. HOW MANY?
4.
OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIFY) m 4.
HOW M ANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?
OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?
OF THESC. HOW MANY CO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
5 HAVE YOU LIVED AT T OUR PRESENT ADORESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS?
YES NO 6
HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR F APilLY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY OlF FICULTY ODTAINING HE ALTH TREATMENT?
YES IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY OBTAINING:
DOCTOR INOT EMERGENCY)
DE N TIST
_ _EME RGENCY F.iE 0iCAL TREATMENT HOSPl T A LIZATION OTHER (f'LE ASE SFECIFY)
NO i
7.
H AVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING k..TH YOU IN THE PROJECT ARE A HAD TO TR AVEL l
OUTSIDE YCUR PRESENT COUNTY TO 087AIN HEALTH TREATVENT?
vES. Ir Sv. WH AT WAS THE SE RVICE AND WHERE DID YOU H AVE TO GO?
e NO 1
TH ANK YOU FOR COOPE R ATING IN THIS SURVEY.
M ARISVILLE NUCLE AR PL ANT FCLLCwuP I
1
_ Appendix E Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle Time Required from Official Survey Date*
Activity 2 weeks Allow for personnel paperwork 3 weeks Print address labels, survey forms and mail to project.
3 weeks Conduct aurvey and return forms.
2 weeks Code forms, update files, produce tables, and send tables to coordinator.
4 weeks Contingency time for reproduction, mail, or project site problems.
2 weeks Prepare first two sections of report and send to functional staff.i*
3 weeks Functional staffs draft sections and submit them.
4 weeks Prepare and dietribute draft report and receive comments.
2 weeks incorporate comments and send final report to reproduction.
2 weeks Printing.
2 weeks Contingency time for mail, typing, or other delays.
I week Distribute reports.
- The survey date for each project is the last day a person can be hired and still be surveyed.
- Functional staff are those dealing eith specitic areas such cs education or health.
A
-(
's M
/j g
p,g
- ' g y/g m
/j r Ih l /
(
8 W
.s4
' )b
'l, -7 f'(3 J J(k J^k '.g@.
/ h g
3 d
{
N.
,j g~p o.
Ei
- iJ g
a, x-
,_ 2 m
z.
i
, [s 9,,
~ 8 h ;yd *
!'I i
h t
g u
zW 1
af T$ o
"" )
/
f.r(Q. ;} Ql ' &._Q 4" 2
c r'k ' g j
- i..'
a ;.
i Qg g
a
,f A. y, j
m ;-pm s,=.su Q
.y
,.y N. g% k, S z, $
, E, m.
o
.o
'A[.r l.d;}
S I N,.
j
., s, t
~
f,' h(,
M I,'y 1.M o
,6
% -4 j
's
_._ga-g; la W at &
lI
',\\
0 I
i
/
m o
Q
.,y j
ps,(g4 ; 3.
kII
~
.j 1
N
(
- p.. \\
m z
.Yi
$2 l ' Q j'[ <' sg-i
~'
s s
-,,' ',F 3.. ' p,/,%,g,~
4 7V F-4 i/
[
. / ; 7,r
,z s
-w t-T F-e t 4Z o
. /-
3 p.
3, Ij :
- e
, ) l. > %.,qO h_. @y..
[ y.i U
t gb-O Io e-Y
{
{g [I M, 4 Wblij l
,f r'
1
$p" !%['I h g,l N y; 4,/@ g[ -} :, !
"+
F m
. hrw/
3 m, H:
/
z 3
N'y}?Di, i 3., 3 <s k - y} w l:p[., :
3,
n' vy rW.J o
_.s l}j '~s.), ' '
A
- [y
(
s o
g t
y
{3.s F% '
k.'
R l N, ;'{ M} A M y jLLE2f'j.l~ ()
l'-
l,'.
.r.D 9i VA:
{Q f(
5
's
/(
i f 6 V ; l. d ii'~l%: Mr f.g:r _( w s. u.VI %.. M M
'. 4 x w.2 V
./.p y
- i
- fA w
~I I W ~1 v. ' a +. '; 1 -
/
a r,.+pe,4 i
y 1
'9:
I ' - -h/
jj
/'k 7
F' 7 k,,[,m. k'!N)Nh. {hd;f h' he'j' ${h3
'g_
.e ;
- p. 2 m
ms w w m?- g y K - n p' V f l
a +/ y
- no.02 z
,,f L'L-~
- 3y x ; *
,q. -
x l j
.vj
/g
, es._- Fp4 r
s sg a- ? a x
i
~.:
n; l
1 N
I' s
pp\\ q g4g}7
,7,t.gog4. j
. g. jg-my 1
3
/_
9 y
l'y / j,3 %y' n.),g, e +j,,
!s e s
1 yy l
w, s
4.
Bu/. t j /r ' h p A t h.3) u
,1:
N I
g
/.
.1.
.u
..if mp. !
w...,,.x z#a i %,. m,s L _ s.
m s
s.<.,>
\\
' W.g-.,, (.
~ =, J n~ f,,.
c;q.g
~ %,
j:
g s,
w.
g~
1 e-i t
i t {k x) h
.. M., a y
, ~--
~ t ~jo a
. j-~. y n ' - ; };
{?'~
l E 'l)..
u
,W o
- g
, jY j
\\g l[
^ * '
p
/e l y
s k
n. b 4 L w',, n,x a, x'se,< y1 mn.R f
la ya-
,a
.i,- <.pt x
w e
M ;,. ipa,9,f g. y!
y
[q
. J.A 4 r, a
3 to :
WL \\Y U
'$A N
5,: db!
I a
al.
!An '
a$3 1
L
.